mahler symphony no. 5 | program notes
DESCRIPTION
Shostakovich’s Violin Concerto No. 1 is an intense, alluring work that is at times sublime and haunting. Music Director Andrew Litton is joined by Nadja Salerno-Sonnenberg, often regarded as the champion of this great work. The program closes with one of Mahler’s most popular symphonies creating an experience that is simultaneously powerful and emotional.TRANSCRIPT
SOUNDINGS 2014/15 | COLORADOSYMPHONY.ORG PROGRAM 5
MASTERWORKS • 2014/15
MAHLER SYMPHONY NO. 5
COLORADO SYMPHONY
ANDREW LITTON, conductor
NADJA SALERNOSONNENBERG, violin
Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 7:30 pm
Friday, May 1, 2015 at 7:30 pm
Sunday, May 3, 2015 at 1:00 pm
Boettcher Concert Hall
SHOSTAKOVICH Violin Concerto No. 1 in A minor, Op. 99
Nocturne: Moderato
Scherzo: Allegro
Passacaglia: Andante
Burlesca: Allegro con brio
INTERMISSION
MAHLER Symphony No. 5 in C-sharp minor
Part I
Trauermarsch: In gemessenem Schritt. Streng.
Wie ein Kondukt
Stürmisch bewegt, mit grösster Vehemenz
Part II
Scherzo: Kräftig, nicht zu schnell
Part III
Adagietto: Sehr langsam
Rondo – Finale: Allegro
THIS WEEKEND OF CONCERTS IS GRATEFULLY DEDICATED TO MERLE CHAMBERS AND HUGH GRANT
FRIDAY’S CONCERT IS GRATEFULLY DEDICATED TO MR. AND MRS. EDWARD H. BOCK
SUNDAY’S CONCERT IS GRATEFULLY DEDICATED TO MR. AND MRS. JACK GRYNBERG
PROGRAM 6 SOUNDINGS 2014/15 | COLORADOSYMPHONY.ORG
ANDREW LITTON, conductor
Andrew Litton currently serves as Music Director of the Colorado Symphony,
Norway’s Bergen Philharmonic Orchestra, the New York City Ballet, Artistic
Director of the Minnesota Orchestra’s Sommerfest and Conductor Laureate
of Britain’s Bournemouth Symphony. He was also Music Director of the
Dallas Symphony from 1994-2006. He guest conducts the world’s leading
orchestras and has a discography of over 120 recordings with awards
including America’s Grammy®, France’s Diapason d’Or, and many British and
other honours. Litton has also conducted many of the world’s finest opera
companies, such as the Metropolitan Opera, Royal Opera Covent Garden, Deutsche Oper Berlin
and the Australian Opera. Besides his Grammy®-winning Walton’s Belshazzar’s Feast with Bryn
Terfel and the Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra, he also recorded the complete symphonies
by Tchaikovsky and Rachmaninov, a Dallas Mahler cycle, and many Gershwin recordings, as both
conductor and pianist. For Hyperion Andrew Litton’s recordings include piano concertos by
Rachmaninov, Liszt and Grieg with Stephen Hough; by Shostakovich, Shchedrin and Brahms with
Marc-André Hamelin; and by Alnæs and Sinding with Piers Lane; Prokofiev’s Cello Concerto and
Symphony-Concerto with Alban Gerhardt; Viola Concertos by Bartók and Rózsa with Lawrence
Power; the complete symphonies by Charles Ives and orchestral works by Joseph Schwantner.
Andrew Litton received his bachelor’s and master’s degrees from Juilliard in piano and conducting.
He is an accomplished pianist, and often conducts from the keyboard and enjoys performing
chamber music with his orchestra colleagues. For further information, visit www.andrewlitton.com.
NADJA SALERNO-SONNENBERG, violin
“One of the few classical artists who must be experienced in person.”
—The Washington Post
Passion, excitement, and innovation are the hallmarks of internationally
acclaimed soloist and chamber musician Nadja Salerno-Sonnenberg’s
artistry. Praised for her compelling performances, daring interpretations
and dedication to her craft, she is one of today’s leading violinists,
renowned for her work on the concert stage, in the recording studio,
and highly respected for her vision and guidance as music director of
the San Francisco-based New Century Chamber Orchestra, which she joined in January 2008.
With successful careers in both the solo and chamber music worlds, Nadja continues to enthrall
audiences of all ages. A powerful and creative presence on the recording scene, Nadja Salerno-
Sonnenberg continues to enrich the collection of her record label, NSS Music, and in May 2014
released the label’s eleventh CD, an all-New Century Chamber Orchestra commissions CD
featuring works by Clarice Assad, William Bolcom, Michael Daugherty, and Ellen Taaffe Zwilich.
Nadja also has over twenty releases on the EMI and Nonesuch labels. Salerno-Sonnenberg’s
professional career began in 1981 when she won the Walter W. Naumburg International Violin
Competition. She is the recipient of an Avery Fisher Career Grant, and the prestigious Avery
Fisher Prize, awarded to instrumentalists who have demonstrated “outstanding achievement
and excellence in music.” An American citizen, Salerno-Sonnenberg was born in Rome and
emigrated to the United States at the age of eight to study at The Curtis Institute of Music. She
later studied with Dorothy DeLay at The Juilliard School.
MASTERWORKS BIOGRAPHIESJE
FF
WH
EE
LE
RC
HR
IST
IAN
ST
EIN
ER
SOUNDINGS 2014/15 | COLORADOSYMPHONY.ORG PROGRAM 7
MASTERWORKS PROGRAM NOTESDmitri Shostakovich: Violin Concerto No. 1 in A minor, Op. 99
Dmitri Shostakovich was born on September 25, 1906, in St. Petersburg and died on August 9,
1975, in Moscow. The Violin Concerto was composed in 1947-1948. Its duration is approximately 36
minutes; it is scored for solo violin, three flutes (3rd doubling piccolo), three oboes (3rd doubling English
horn), three clarinets (3rd doubling bass clarinet), three bassoons (3rd doubling contrabassoon), four
horns, tuba, timpani, percussion, harp, celesta, and strings. The last performance by the orchestra
was on January 13-15, 2012, with Karen Gomyo as the violin soloist and Pietari Inkinen conducting.
On no other major recent composer has more ink been spilt attempting to understand
what thought processes and motivations reveal the true self than that on Shostakovich. The
evidence is fought over, sifted, and re-sifted to build the case that he was a musically-gifted,
but incredibly naïve, tool of the worst instincts of Stalinism. Or, on the other hand, that he was a
musically-gifted, but wondrously deceptive, resident critic of the terrors of Soviet Communism.
Even — something of both, for Shostakovich left a maddeningly ambiguous record of his inner
thoughts.
His artistic life is a case study in the tragic difficulty of being true to one’s own sense of artistic
integrity and vision, while balancing that with the practical necessity of having any opportunity
to exist at all--both as an artist, or even as a human being--in an oppressive totalitarian society.
Accordingly, his compositions varied in their styles over the decades. Those of his early maturity
were composed under the daily fear of his vanishing in Stalin’s purges of the 1930s; during the
“Great Patriotic War” with the Nazi government, the national effort allowed artists a bit more
latitude in their expressions. But the clamp down after the war produced understandable, but
confusingly coöperative “artistic confessions” of his lack of sufficient sensitivity to collectivist
politics. Thus, his long line of fifteen symphonies is marked by a few embarrassingly “populist”
potboilers, as well as by his immortal masterpieces.
Shostakovich was equally capable of writing satirical compositions that scathingly excoriate
the excesses and flaws of Western Democracies, as well as works of dark and profound passion
that lament the fundamental tragedies of universal human experience. It is tempting for those
who enjoy easy freedoms of artistic expression to hold others from other times to a high moral
standard and to adjure them to not “sell out” their integrity. But few major composers have
endured such political and artistic oppression, as did Shostakovich.
Which brings us to his first violin concerto. The impressive gifts of the great Russian violinist,
David Oistrakh, led Shostakovich to begin the composition of the concerto in Summer 1947,
while in the meantime, epic political events were brewing. Andrey Zhdanov, head of state affairs
for the arts, was orchestrating a campaign to repress those artists who were not sufficiently
toeing the Stalinist line for accessible music for the proletariat. The storm erupted in January
1945, when Shostakovich, Prokofiev, and others more or less had their non-conformist
compositions proscribed. Consequently, the violin concerto went into what Shostakovich called
“the drawer” – a metaphor for works that were dangerously out of political fashion, and which
he kept to himself. After Stalin’s death in March 1953, the concerto and other great works came
out of “the drawer,” and musical posterity is much the richer. The violin concerto is dedicated
to Oistrakh; he collaborated with some revisions and played the première with the Leningrad
Philharmonic in October 1955.
Cast in four movements, rather than the typical three, it is a dark, serious, and weighty
affair, and clearly symphonic in both scope and composition. Bearing little resemblance to
PROGRAM 8 SOUNDINGS 2014/15 | COLORADOSYMPHONY.ORG
MASTERWORKS PROGRAM NOTESviolin concertos that feature memorable melodies and an emphasis upon showy virtuosity,
Shostakovich’s work is a formidable intellectual challenge as well a musical one — and for the
soloist, it must be said, a physical one, as well. The first movement, “Nocturne,” is, of course,
an unusual way to begin a concerto, and the mood is more than crepuscular--it is a study
in pessimistic reflections at midnight. The orchestra stays well out of the way, yet provides
a backdrop of somber dark, rich colors as the soloist relentlessly weaves a weft of tentative,
searching melodic lines that pose questions, but no answers. Some have aptly compared it
with the sad, elegiac first movement of Elgar’s Cello Concerto — a reflection of the death and
destruction of WWI.
Most symphonies have a scherzo as an inner movement, and in this concerto Shostakovich
has written one that is obviously related to the common trope of a “dæmonic,” “satanic,” or
“devil’s” violin. This image goes back to the Middle Ages, and has been common coin in musical
compositions since the nineteenth century. The strings mostly retire here, as the soloist engages
with the unusual colors in the threatening woodwinds. Here, as in the last movement, there is a
hint of Jewish scales and melody — but only a hint. Shostakovich about this time had composed
other compositions on specifically Jewish themes as a counter to anti-Semitism, and that
interest surfaces here, as well. The composer’s famed mastery of musical sarcasm pervades the
frenetic virtuosity.
The third movement — clearly a dirge--is a case in point as a target for Stalin’s apparatchiks,
ever vigilant for the artistic sin of “formalism” — that is abstract music without palpable
reference to the glories of collectivism. It is a passacaglia, a centuries old technique that uses
a repeating bass line (think of the Pachelbel canon) to generate structure. Here, the bass
line is seventeen bars long, repeated nine times, with Shostakovich’s skill as an imaginative
orchestrator coming to the fore. Each repetition of the bass theme is clothed in new orchestra
colors, building into heart-rending intensity with each iteration. Finally, when there seems to
be nowhere else to go in this stress and passion, the soloist plunges into a challenging cadenza
of unprecedented power, length, and drama. It practically takes on the significance of a fifth
movement, and eventually takes us right into the last movement, Burlesca.
It’s a riotous, wild affair, threatening to careen out of control, with familiar elements of
Shostakovich’s style propelling us along: Russian dancing and drinking, Jewish folksongs,
vicious social parody, among others. As this vital composition drives to a smashing conclusion,
the audience will perhaps be as exhausted as the orchestra and soloist. Notwithstanding his
putative, occasional acquiescence to the oppressive Soviet state, the Violin Concerto, along with
its peers, is eloquent testimony to the genius of the real Dimitri Shostakovich.
o
SOUNDINGS 2014/15 | COLORADOSYMPHONY.ORG PROGRAM 9
MASTERWORKS PROGRAM NOTESGustav Mahler: Symphony No. 5 in C-sharp minor
Gustav Mahler was born on July 7, 1860, in Kalischt, Bohemia and died on May 18, 1911, in Vienna.
His Fifth Symphony was composed in 1901-1902. Its large orchestration calls for four flutes (3rd and 4th
doubling piccolo), three oboes (3rd doubling English horn), three clarinets (3rd doubling bass clarinet
and E-flat clarinet), three bassoons (3rd doubling contrabassoon), six horns, four trumpets, three
trombones, tuba, timpani, percussion, and harp. Duration is approximately 72 minutes. The last
performance by the orchestra was on June 4-6, 2010, with Jeffrey Kahane on the podium.
When Gustav Mahler died in 1911, at the age of fifty-one, his years cut short by heart disease,
by most measures he had enjoyed an enviable life and career. He was respected as one of the
most effective and innovative of opera conductors; his leadership of some of the world’s most
admired symphony orchestras had set new artistic standards; his songs and his symphonies
were beginning to enjoy a modicum of success in respected artistic circles; and he was married
to one of the most attractive, talented, and vivacious women in Europe. But, that is a sadly
incomplete picture. In point of fact, after ten years of leading the musical life of the world’s
most important musical city, he was hounded out of his tenure as conductor of the court opera
and the Vienna Philharmonic by an unrelenting anti-Semiticism of unprecedented virulence.
The Viennese press attacked him without mercy, lampooning his conducting gestures and
attributing every ostensible weakness to his Jewish background. His subsequent, brief career at
the Metropolitan Opera and the New York Philharmonic had soon grown stale as he succumbed
to his fatal illness. Those who did not appreciate and understand his music held the majority,
and he was roundly ridiculed for its general incomprehensibility, eccentricity, and wildly
personal nature. His beloved little daughter, Maria, had died at the age of four from diphtheria.
And, the passion of his life Alma Schindler Mahler, had repeatedly betrayed him in more
than one deeply wounding incident. Taken altogether, his life was a series of contradictions:
profound successes, abysmal disappointments, and little in between.
Symphony No. 5, the first of three symphonies often grouped together as “middle-period” works,
was begun during the summer of 1901. It was finished the next summer, right after his marriage
to the beautiful Alma. A marriage from Hell — psychological, that is — if there ever was one.
But at that time, he was beside himself with joy. However, as we shall see, that joy comes to
expression in this symphony only in one well-known movement.
The first movement opens with a solo trumpet fanfare, one of the most famous in the
literature, and revered by trumpet players everywhere. But it is not the inspiring call to noble
deeds that most presume it to be. Rather it is perhaps one of his most characteristic uses of the
commonplace to set up a parody of everyday existence, for a funeral march is what follows.
Think of it as a pedestrian bugle call. This is a decidedly unusual way to begin a symphony —
complete slow movements rarely do so, much less one conceived as a funeral march. After
some dark brass chords from the abyss, the march tune proper begins — a solemn affair, but
the careful ear will hear in the violins an occasional snatch of a bit here and there of maudlin
Viennese dance hall allusions. Here again, is the typical Mahlerian juxtaposition of radically
different cultural experiences. Then, soon there arrives a justly famous galvanizing moment:
in Mahler’s score indications — “Suddenly faster, impassioned, wild.” Wild it is; commentators
and performers alike have heard it as “hysterical screaming,” and as the voice of murderers and
victims, no less. This cosmic terror — not unusual in the composer’s music — soon subsides and
a bit of the opening fanfare takes us back to the sentimental salon music disguised as a funeral
PROGRAM 10 SOUNDINGS 2014/15 | COLORADOSYMPHONY.ORG
march. The movement proceeds to its dissolution, with the “bugle calls” marking the end.
Mahler marks the second movement as “Stormy,” and it palpably begins as such. But, typically,
there soon arrives a genial broad melody in the strings, accompanied by a gentle chirping in the
woodwinds. The alternation of storm and sentimental reflection continues—with the occasional
little march--as Mahler, in his words, “kneads” the myriad musical possibilities of his material. And
then, a magical Mahler moment, as the brass section luminously peals forth a radiant, affirmative
chorale. The sonorous warmth doesn’t last long—they hardly have a chance to finish — before
the storm returns. It winds down quickly, though, as various sections and soloists play the short
little motive that has been so important. As quiet, isolated “rain drops” fall, the solo tuba gets the
last word and the storm is over.
The third movement in symphonies is usually a dance, or dancelike one — going all the way
back to the days of Haydn — and Mahler doesn’t disappoint us. This one is a graceful (mostly)
waltz, and why not? It’s Vienna, after all. But, it’s a really long one, beginning cheerfully, and
moving from one interesting idea to another, all of the time affording the composer ample
opportunity to engage in contrapuntal textures. Unlike much of the rest of the symphony,
however, the textures are often spare and open, giving us plenty of space to really hear the
exposed lines. There are serious moments as it proceeds to move through lengthy musical
territory, but they’re not dark, stormy, or terror filled — just intense exploration of contrapuntal
ideas where almost everyone gets an exposed opportunity to solo a bit. Finally, a recitative-like
passage for various solo brasses — especially the first horn — signals the end, followed by a rush
to the cadence by the whole orchestra.
And now, what is perhaps Mahler’s most well known music, the famous “Adagietto.” It is the
added movement in the symphony, and gained worldwide fame for its constant use in the
film, “Death in Venice” (1971). Simply put, it’s an intense love offering to Alma, written in the
summer of 1902, right after their marriage. He worshiped her, and it shows eloquently here,
almost painfully so. Especially considering the checkered relationship that plagued them almost
from beginning to end. He met her while she was having an affair with her music composition
teacher, Alexander Zemlinsky, and he died while she was in a notorious, semi-public affair
with Walter Gropius, later one of the founding fathers of modern architecture (the Bauhaus
School). Mahler’s letters to her, his anguished notations in his musical scores — they’re almost
embarrassing — are a testimony to his long-suffering devotion to her. But, in the moment
there was happiness, even if he exaggerated it in his mind. Not only newlywed bliss, but also
incredible beauty — all in the music. After his death she blithely went on to collect serially other
geniuses as her lovers. If the purity of the love he expressed was only in his mind, well, irony was
Mahler’s middle name.
After all the turmoil, stormy passions, and terror, the last movement finally arrives, and it is
a cheerful affair — much to the relief of many. However, from the work’s première, this very
upbeat mood has been the target of not a few critics — starting with Alma, herself — who have
felt that it was a somewhat forced, and uncharacteristic way to follow all that had gone before.
“How can all of that lead to a cheerful ending? It’s got to be insincere.” Be that as it may, most
enjoy it that way, and after a few little bucolic solos from both the woodwinds and brass, the
bustling, happy finale begins. Mahler chose a very traditional form for this last movement, a
rondo — its use goes back to the early days of the symphony — and it’s merely the alternation
between material that comes back from time to time in recognizable fashion and episodes
MASTERWORKS PROGRAM NOTES
SOUNDINGS 2014/15 | COLORADOSYMPHONY.ORG PROGRAM 11
of new material. What is most likely welcome, as well, for the audience is that Mahler’s tunes
and motifs are usually easy to remember and recognize. The texture is not so dense, and we
can follow the composer’s counterpoint, as the main melodic elements intertwine rather like a
very long, and fragmented fugue. The drive to the end is mostly constant, with sudden, short
outbursts in the brass and timpani that signal brief changes in the musical territory. There’s a
lot of ground to cover, but gradually we sense the growing tension underlying the end. A short,
peaceful interlude of repose, featuring the woodwinds, provides a break before the serious
final drive. A rhythmic sea of overlapping melodies builds, posing the question: what possible
conclusion can top all this off? Mahler’s answer — and, as noted above, it was controversial
from the outset — is to bring back the aborted brass chorale from the second movement. This
time, over sizzling string activity, he allows it to soar out in a truly magnificent and inspiring
fulfillment. After this glorious moment, nothing else is possible but a short frenzied drive home.
Craftsman to the end, even in this quicksilver crash to the conclusion, Mahler ends with allusions
to the little outbursts from earlier on, and to the main ideas.
Along with moments of transcendent beauty, there is also much that challenges, perhaps
perplexes, or even offends, here. Nevertheless, it provides a convincing representation of
Mahler, the man, as much as Mahler, the composer. Famously, when compared with the easy,
widespread approval of the music of his friend — and rival — Richard Strauss, he simply
remarked, “One day people will separate the wheat from the chaff — and when his day has
passed, then my time will come.”
— Wm. E. Runyan©William E. Runyan
MASTERWORKS PROGRAM NOTES
COLORADOSYMPHONY.ORG | 303.623.7876 BOX OFFICE MON-FRI 10 AM - 6 PM SAT 12 PM - 6 PM
Bronfman Plays BeethovenMAY 22-24 FRI-SAT 7:30 SUN 1:00Andrew Litton, conductor
Yefim Bronfman, piano
Alan Opie, baritone
Colorado Symphony Chorus; Duain Wolfe, director
VAUGHAN WILLIAMS Overture to The Wasps
BEETHOVEN Piano Concerto No. 4 in G major, Op. 58
WALTON Belshazzar’s Feast