major crossmatch versus typescreen

Upload: avi-verma

Post on 14-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen

    1/13

    1

    Major Crossmatch versusType&Screen : Why to choose for

    Type&Screen

    Major Vandenvelde Christian, PhysicianBiologist, Head of Military Service for

    Blood Transfusion, Head of BrugmannU.H.C. / Queen Fabiola Children U.H.C. /C.T.R. / Heysel R.C. Immuno -

    Haematology Laboratory

  • 7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen

    2/13

    2

    What is a Major Crossmatch ?

    Compatible RBC Bag(s) request

    Patient RBC ABO-D(-CcEe)(-K) Typing

    Typing-compatible RBC Bag(s) selection

    Bag(s) RBC crossmatching with Patient plasma

    Bag(s) RBC compatible with Patient plasma

    RBC Bag(s) reservation for Patient

    What if positive Major Crossmatch ?

  • 7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen

    3/13

    3

    What is a Type&Screen ?

    Compatible RBC Bag(s) request

    Patient RBC ABO-D(-CcEe)(-K) Typing+ Patient plasma Screening for Irregular

    anti-RBC Ab by crossmatching withcommercially available selected 3-RBC-panel(s)

    Patient plasma negative IAT Typing-compatible RBC Bag(s) selectionwhen needed

    What if positive IAT ?

  • 7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen

    4/13

    4

    What if positive MXM / IAT ?

    Positive MXM Either : further Bag(s) RBC Crossmatching with

    Patient plasma

    Or : Patient plasma Screening for Irregular anti-

    RBC Ab Positive IAT

    Irregular anti-RBC Ab Identification withcommercially available 11-RBC-panel(s)

    Typing- & Identification-compatible RBC Bag(s)selection when needed

    What if available Bag(s) RBC were not phenotyped forconcerned Ag ?

    What if Patient anti-RBC Ab remain(s) unidentified ?

  • 7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen

    5/13

    5

    What if unidentified Patient Ab /

    non-phenotyped Bag(s) RBC Ag ?

    Available Typing-compatible Bags RBCCrossmatching with Patient plasma

    Available Typing-compatible Bags RBC

    phenotyping for concerned AgTyping- / Identification-compatible RBC

    Bag(s) searching by B.T.C. in :

    national BTI RBC Bags stocks international BTI Frozen-Phenotyped-RBC

    Bags stocks

  • 7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen

    6/13

    6

    PRELIMINARY CONCLUSION

    Most of the time the right question will be :Why to choose either for MXM or for T&S asFIRST RBC compatibility test ?

    4 Ways to go :

    MXM only Example : Q.A.M.H. Blood Bank

    T&S only Example : Military Ops Support

    First T&S, then MXM Example : BrugmannU.H.C. (Laeken + Schaerbeek + Jette sites) / Queen

    Fabiola Children U.H.C. / Centre for Traumatology& Rehabilitation / Heysel Rehabilitation CentreBlood Bank

    First MXM, then T&S Example(s) : cfr previous

    presentation

  • 7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen

    7/13

    7

    Type&Screen resources constraints

    Reagents : commercially available ScreeningRBC-panels are expensive but

    Technologists : Screening procedures are easyto automate but

    Equipments : Screening automates areexpensive but

    RBC Bags stock : Screening allows

    an average RBC Bags stock reduction of +/- 33% an average RBC Bags expiry rate reduction of +/-

    95%, especially when a M.S.B.O.S. has beensuccessfully implemented, but

  • 7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen

    8/13

    8

    Type&Screen Patient risks

    Screening misses 1 allo-Ab per 3000 RBCcompatibility tests but

    Screening misses 1 weakly-reactive potentiallyclinically significant allo-Ab per 30000 RBCcompatibility tests but

    Screening-missed allo-Ab likely would not result inlife-threatening reactions but

    Screening misses clerical ABO-compatibility RBCBags selection / labelling errors but

    Screening is mandatory followed by an ABO-compatibility check but

    Screening misses allo-Ab present in residual plasmaof RBC Bags but

    National BTIs have to warrant the absence of

    clinically significant allo-Ab in produced L.B.C.

  • 7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen

    9/13

    9

    MXM only : Burn Unit Q.A.M.H.

    Blood Bank support

    Reagents & Equipments : no de novo allo-Ab in 13 years

    3 allo-Ab at admission in 13 years

    +/- 66% of requested RBC Bags are transfused

    Technologists : no experience in allo-Ab identification

    1 MXM for 2 RBC Bags from same apheresis donor

    presence required for other lab tasks

    RBC Bags stock : 2 times the average numberof transfused RBC Bags

    Patients risks : ABO-D-CcEe-Kk-compatibleRBC Bags are electronically selected

  • 7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen

    10/13

    10

    T&S only : Military Ops Q.A.M.H.

    Blood Bank support

    Reagents, Technologists & Equipments : Screening before departure makes field-lab

    compatibility testing useless

    Screening-positive soldiers remain in Belgium(0.01%)

    RBC Bags stock : 20 refrigerated + 1200frozen O Rh/K-negative RBC Bags arecontinuously available

    Patients risks : O Rh/K-negative RBC Bags are universal

    RBC Bags are systematically tested for auto- & allo-Ab

    Donor Typing occurs at least 2 times before first

    donation

  • 7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen

    11/13

    11

    First T&S, then MXM : Brugmann

    Blood Bank resources constraints

    Reagents : unusually high frequency of allo-immunised, polytransfused & multipregnancypatients

    Technologists : important experience in allo-Ab identification 4 years ago, 15% of requested RBC Bags were

    transfused

    Equipments : 4 years ago, unusually high

    frequency of RBC Bags requestsRBC Bags stock : after 4 years, RBC Bags

    needs & expiry rates have already beenreduced by 33% & 85%, respectively

  • 7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen

    12/13

    12

    First T&S, then MXM : Brugmann

    Blood Bank risks management

    Extended phenotyping of haematology /oncology patients at first admission

    As extended as possible electronic-crossmatch

    for haematology / oncology / childbearingpatients

    Maximal use of ABO-D-CcEe-Kk-DAT-IATscreened RBC Bags

    Maximal availability of extendedly phenotypedRBC Bags

    ABO-compatibility check at patients bed

  • 7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen

    13/13

    13

    FINAL CONCLUSION

    QUESTION :Why to choose either for Major

    Crossmatch or for Type & Screen as

    (FIRST) RBC compatibility test ?

    ANSWER :

    It only depends on hospital blood

    bank human and material resources andpatients risks management capabilities