major crossmatch versus typescreen
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen
1/13
1
Major Crossmatch versusType&Screen : Why to choose for
Type&Screen
Major Vandenvelde Christian, PhysicianBiologist, Head of Military Service for
Blood Transfusion, Head of BrugmannU.H.C. / Queen Fabiola Children U.H.C. /C.T.R. / Heysel R.C. Immuno -
Haematology Laboratory
-
7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen
2/13
2
What is a Major Crossmatch ?
Compatible RBC Bag(s) request
Patient RBC ABO-D(-CcEe)(-K) Typing
Typing-compatible RBC Bag(s) selection
Bag(s) RBC crossmatching with Patient plasma
Bag(s) RBC compatible with Patient plasma
RBC Bag(s) reservation for Patient
What if positive Major Crossmatch ?
-
7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen
3/13
3
What is a Type&Screen ?
Compatible RBC Bag(s) request
Patient RBC ABO-D(-CcEe)(-K) Typing+ Patient plasma Screening for Irregular
anti-RBC Ab by crossmatching withcommercially available selected 3-RBC-panel(s)
Patient plasma negative IAT Typing-compatible RBC Bag(s) selectionwhen needed
What if positive IAT ?
-
7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen
4/13
4
What if positive MXM / IAT ?
Positive MXM Either : further Bag(s) RBC Crossmatching with
Patient plasma
Or : Patient plasma Screening for Irregular anti-
RBC Ab Positive IAT
Irregular anti-RBC Ab Identification withcommercially available 11-RBC-panel(s)
Typing- & Identification-compatible RBC Bag(s)selection when needed
What if available Bag(s) RBC were not phenotyped forconcerned Ag ?
What if Patient anti-RBC Ab remain(s) unidentified ?
-
7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen
5/13
5
What if unidentified Patient Ab /
non-phenotyped Bag(s) RBC Ag ?
Available Typing-compatible Bags RBCCrossmatching with Patient plasma
Available Typing-compatible Bags RBC
phenotyping for concerned AgTyping- / Identification-compatible RBC
Bag(s) searching by B.T.C. in :
national BTI RBC Bags stocks international BTI Frozen-Phenotyped-RBC
Bags stocks
-
7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen
6/13
6
PRELIMINARY CONCLUSION
Most of the time the right question will be :Why to choose either for MXM or for T&S asFIRST RBC compatibility test ?
4 Ways to go :
MXM only Example : Q.A.M.H. Blood Bank
T&S only Example : Military Ops Support
First T&S, then MXM Example : BrugmannU.H.C. (Laeken + Schaerbeek + Jette sites) / Queen
Fabiola Children U.H.C. / Centre for Traumatology& Rehabilitation / Heysel Rehabilitation CentreBlood Bank
First MXM, then T&S Example(s) : cfr previous
presentation
-
7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen
7/13
7
Type&Screen resources constraints
Reagents : commercially available ScreeningRBC-panels are expensive but
Technologists : Screening procedures are easyto automate but
Equipments : Screening automates areexpensive but
RBC Bags stock : Screening allows
an average RBC Bags stock reduction of +/- 33% an average RBC Bags expiry rate reduction of +/-
95%, especially when a M.S.B.O.S. has beensuccessfully implemented, but
-
7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen
8/13
8
Type&Screen Patient risks
Screening misses 1 allo-Ab per 3000 RBCcompatibility tests but
Screening misses 1 weakly-reactive potentiallyclinically significant allo-Ab per 30000 RBCcompatibility tests but
Screening-missed allo-Ab likely would not result inlife-threatening reactions but
Screening misses clerical ABO-compatibility RBCBags selection / labelling errors but
Screening is mandatory followed by an ABO-compatibility check but
Screening misses allo-Ab present in residual plasmaof RBC Bags but
National BTIs have to warrant the absence of
clinically significant allo-Ab in produced L.B.C.
-
7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen
9/13
9
MXM only : Burn Unit Q.A.M.H.
Blood Bank support
Reagents & Equipments : no de novo allo-Ab in 13 years
3 allo-Ab at admission in 13 years
+/- 66% of requested RBC Bags are transfused
Technologists : no experience in allo-Ab identification
1 MXM for 2 RBC Bags from same apheresis donor
presence required for other lab tasks
RBC Bags stock : 2 times the average numberof transfused RBC Bags
Patients risks : ABO-D-CcEe-Kk-compatibleRBC Bags are electronically selected
-
7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen
10/13
10
T&S only : Military Ops Q.A.M.H.
Blood Bank support
Reagents, Technologists & Equipments : Screening before departure makes field-lab
compatibility testing useless
Screening-positive soldiers remain in Belgium(0.01%)
RBC Bags stock : 20 refrigerated + 1200frozen O Rh/K-negative RBC Bags arecontinuously available
Patients risks : O Rh/K-negative RBC Bags are universal
RBC Bags are systematically tested for auto- & allo-Ab
Donor Typing occurs at least 2 times before first
donation
-
7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen
11/13
11
First T&S, then MXM : Brugmann
Blood Bank resources constraints
Reagents : unusually high frequency of allo-immunised, polytransfused & multipregnancypatients
Technologists : important experience in allo-Ab identification 4 years ago, 15% of requested RBC Bags were
transfused
Equipments : 4 years ago, unusually high
frequency of RBC Bags requestsRBC Bags stock : after 4 years, RBC Bags
needs & expiry rates have already beenreduced by 33% & 85%, respectively
-
7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen
12/13
12
First T&S, then MXM : Brugmann
Blood Bank risks management
Extended phenotyping of haematology /oncology patients at first admission
As extended as possible electronic-crossmatch
for haematology / oncology / childbearingpatients
Maximal use of ABO-D-CcEe-Kk-DAT-IATscreened RBC Bags
Maximal availability of extendedly phenotypedRBC Bags
ABO-compatibility check at patients bed
-
7/30/2019 Major Crossmatch Versus TypeScreen
13/13
13
FINAL CONCLUSION
QUESTION :Why to choose either for Major
Crossmatch or for Type & Screen as
(FIRST) RBC compatibility test ?
ANSWER :
It only depends on hospital blood
bank human and material resources andpatients risks management capabilities