making a difference through co-teaching southington high school september 13, 2011 25 industrial...
TRANSCRIPT
Making A Difference through Co-Teaching
Southington High SchoolSeptember 13, 2011
25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT 06457-1520 · (860) 632-1485
Connecticut State Department of Education · Division of Educational Programs and Services
Welcome! Please make a Name Tent.
Total # teaching years A word that describes combined your partnership
Your NamePosition
Grade and course you # of years you havecurrently co-teach co-taught together
Group Norms
• Participate actively:– Ask questions– Share connections– Listen with “all of you”
• Use time wisely.• Take care of each other.• Have fun!• •
? Essential Questions ? What is co-teaching? How does effective co-teaching lead
to greater student achievement? How does co-teaching allow for
meeting the needs of all students in a general classroom, including students with disabilities?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
• two (or more) educators or other certified staff,
• contract to share instructional responsibility,• for a single group of students,• primarily in a single classroom workspace,• for specific content (objectives),• with mutual ownership, pooled resources, and
joint accountability,• although each individual’s level of
participation may vary.
Co-teaching is a service delivery system in which:
Marilyn Friend, Ph.D.
Continuum of Services Hospital or Institution
Homebound Instruction
Residential School
Special Day School
Full-Time Sp. Ed. Classroom
Sp. Ed. Classroom w/part-time in Gen. Ed.
Gen. Ed. Classroom Placement w/Resource Support
Gen. Ed. Classroom Placement with Co-teaching
Gen. Ed. Classroom Placement with Collaborative Consultation
Gen. Ed. Classroom Placement with Few or No Supportive Services
Most
Restric
tive
Least
Restric
tive
Ed
ucatio
nal P
lacem
en
t
Responsible Inclusive Practice means… Students with disabilities attend the neighborhood school they would attend if they were not disabled.
Each child is in an age-appropriate general education classroom.
Every student is regarded as a full and valued member of the class/school community.
Special education supports are provided within the context of the general education classroom.
No child is excluded on the basis of type and degree of disability.
The school promotes cooperative/collaborative teaching arrangements.
Responsible Inclusive Practice does not mean… “Dumping” students with disabilities in the general
education classroom without careful planning and adequate support
Reducing services or funding for special education services
Overloading any one classroom with students with disabilities
Isolating students with disabilities socially, physically, or academically within the general education classroom
Jeopardizing the achievement of general education students through slower instruction or less challenging curriculum
Relegating special education teachers or support services professionals to the role of assistant in the general education classroom
Benefits of Co-Teaching
Students with IEPs• Reduces stigma• Improved instruction• Continuity of instruction• Higher expectations
Students without IEPs• Increases understanding and respect for students with special needs• Improved instruction• Continuity of instruction
Teachers• Support• New sense of expertise• Combination of strengths and resources• Allows more time to reflect, monitor, assess, and adapt instruction• Classroom management
Other• Builds a heterogeneously-based classroom community• Meeting individual student needs• Lowers student/teacher ratio
(Friend)
• Strategies are integrated into classroom routines
• Skills are generalized to authentic task
• Immediate application of strategies• Opportunity for daily practice• Strategies used across the
curriculum• Problem-solving is built into lessons
Instructional Benefits
Our Questions 9/13• How to differentiate within levels/scaffold supports for students whose gaps are
significant?• What types of accommodations can assist students in accessing reading
material?• How to maintain rigor for all students?• How to acclimate students to tasks on summative/performance assessments?• What teaming structures are needed to support vertical alignment of
instruction?• How to differentiate for extreme range of abilities and interests when experience
change in levels?• How will we assess and/or grade accordingly? Will we be able to modify
common assessments based on students IEP?• Will we have both names on Power School/reporting? Will special education
teachers have access to Power School by first progress report?• What will planning time look like?
Our Questions (5/3)
• How do we differentiate our content for our students with ID and not interrupt the learning process for the rest of the class?
• How do we differentiate for all levels including higher order thinking skills?
• How do I construct lessons that include re-teaching skills and moving on with other students?
• Will block scheduling help in doing co-teaching?
Our Questions (5/4)• At what point do we keep kids in large group instruction vs. breaking
into smaller groups to provide the direct instruction that is needed?• How to manage multiple small groups (i.e., noise level, student pairing)?• Should we be pulling students/small groups out of the classroom?• What materials will be available to us that lend themselves to small
group instruction (e.g., flip charts, vocab cards, story board, technology)?
• How to manage discipline issues/class disruptions?• How to balance student needs in co-taught classes (incl. core classes
being scheduled at end of day)?• How to differentiate given range of ability in Health classes?• How to determine essential understandings that all students must
master?• How to differentiate assessments based on students’ ability level?
Our Questions (5/5)• What are the specific strategies we should be using?• What are ways to adapt curriculum, instruction, and
assessments for lower level students?• Who is responsible for making
adjustments/modifications?• How to integrate students with disabilities in general
education curriculum that may be too difficult?• What is the role of the paraprofessional in a co-
taught class (e.g., side by side/whole class, overassistance/helping)?
I. The Cornerstone: A Philosophical Basis
The members of successful co-teaching teams share several common beliefs that constitute a philosophy or a system of principles that guide their practice.
Adams, L., Cessna, K., & Friend, M. (1993). Effectiveness indicators of collaboration in special education/general education co-teaching:
Final report. Denver: Colorado department of Education.
II. Individual Prerequisites
Individual teachers voluntarily bring certain characteristics, knowledge, and skills to the co-teaching situation. – Able to work with another adult– Common sets of knowledge and skills– Discipline specific knowledge and skills– Voluntary***
III. The Professional Relationship
Co-teachers have unique professional relationships– Parity, communication, respect, and trust– Make a commitment to building and maintaining
their professional relationship
IV. Classroom Dynamics
The interactions in a co-taught classroom are unique to this teaching arrangement.
– Clearly define roles & responsibilities– Instructional interactions reflect professional
relationship– Maintain the instructional flow of the whole class by
supporting students– Curriculum explicitly addresses academic,
developmental, compensatory, and life skills and reflects the needs of students in class.
– Monitor their efforts.
V. External supports
External supports facilitate successful co-teaching.– Administrators– Appropriate professional development
Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM)
Three Components of Change
• Stages of Concern• Level of Use• Innovation Configurations
Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) Stages of Concern
6 Refocusing I have some ideas about co-teaching that would work even better.
5 Collaboration I am concerned about relating what I am doing to what other educators are doing.
4 Consequence How is my co-teaching affecting kids?
3 Management I seem to be spending all my time getting material ready.
2 Personal How will co-teaching affect me?
1 Informational I would like to know more about co-teaching.
0 Awareness I am not concerned about co-teaching (the proposed innovation).
Hall & Hord (2001)
Levels of UseVI Renewal How can I modify to make it work
even better?
V Integration How can I collaborate with others in using the innovation?
IVB Refinement How is my use affecting kids?
IVA Routine Why should I change? My way is working just fine.
III Mechanical How can I fit this into the classroom? What impact on management of materials and time?
III0
PreparationOrientationNonuse
Intention and start-up time indicated.Actively looking for information.No knowledge or interest Hall &
Hord (2001)
Storming
Infighting• Controlling conflicts• Confronting people• Opting out• Difficulties• Feeling stuck
Norming
Getting Organized• Developing skills• Establishing procedures• Giving feedback• Confronting issues
Questions to Think About…• How willing am I to let a colleague observe me teaching
content with which I am not particularly familiar?• How willing am I to consider and experiment with different
ways of teaching?• Am I willing to let someone else take responsibility for tasks at
which I am particularly skilled?• What is my level of comfort about relying on someone else in
a joint project?• How ready am I to raise instructional issues with my co-
teaching partner, even if I am uncomfortable doing so?• How prepared am I to listen and respond to instructional
issues that my co-teaching partner may raise with me?
Friend
Parity, Parity, Parity
• Both teachers’ names are on the board.
• Both teachers’ names are on report cards.
• Both teachers have space for personal belongings.
• Both teachers have adult-size furniture.
• Both teachers take a lead role in the classroom.
• Both teachers talk during instruction.
• Both teachers give directions or permission without checking with the other teacher.
• Both teachers work with all students.
• Both teachers are considered teachers by the students, parents, administrators and other staff.
• A – Rules and Routines (Irene)• B – Non-negotiables (Michelle)• C – Teacher Working Style (independent)
Stations
What Are My Non-Negotiables?
All of us have beliefs (rules, concepts, procedures) that are not subject to compromise…our non-negotiables. These exist in both our personal and professional lives. To build open, honest, and effective teams, begin by reviewing these beliefs.
1. List your professional non-negotiables.2. As a team, discuss similarities and differences.3. Reach a compromise on those you have voiced.
Stetson and Associates, Inc.
Teacher Working Style Guide
• Complete the worksheets.• As some point, compare
with your co-teaching partner.
Cypress Fairbanks I.S.D.
“Collaboration cannot exist in a vacuum. It will flourish only in schools in which
professionals believe that instruction is most effective in an environment
characterized by the norms of collegiality and continuous improvement.”
Marilyn Friend, Ph.D.
Use of Approaches
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Start of Year End of Year
OneTeach/ Observe
One Teach/ Drift
Stations
Parallel
Alternative
Team
Teams are encouraged to use all six approaches but a focus should be on the three with the greatest instructional time provided to students.
Basis for Selecting a Co-Teaching Approach
• Student characteristics and needs
• Teacher characteristics and needs
• Curriculum, including content and instructional strategies
• Pragmatic considerations
Why?• To gather data• To analyze data• To check student
progress• To compare
target students to others
When?• In new co-
teaching situations
• After questions arise about students
• As a deliberate part of a lesson
One Teach/One Observe
Planning for One Teach/One Observe
Determine:• who is doing the observing• which student(s) to observe• what objective/behavior• when, how often
Why?• To provide unobtrusive
assistance to all students as needed
• One teacher has a particular area of expertise
When?• In new co-teaching
situations• The lesson lends itself
to delivery by one person
• As a deliberate part of a lesson when students need close monitoring
One Teach/One Assist
Planning for One Teach/One Assist
Determine:• who is doing the “assisting”• which student(s) to assist• what objective/behavior• when, how often
Planning Worksheet for Assisting or Observing
Large Group – Teacher ____________Objective/concept:
Materials:
Assisting/Observing – Teacher ____________
SERC
Student(s) What Time Frame
Why?• To lower
student/teacher ratio• To teach several topics
at once• To teach complex
material that is not hierarchical
When?• Students need to work
in smaller groups• As a deliberate part of
a lesson
Station Teaching
Planning for Stations
Determine:• what objective/concept• who is doing which station
(prep)• how you will group students • how long at each station
Planning Worksheet for Stations
Station ATeacher _______
Station BTeacher _______
Station C(Independent)
Activity:
Students:
SERC
SERC 2010
Flexible Grouping• Use flexible grouping in tandem with constant, on-going
assessment to move students when necessary– benchmark assessments, CFAs, running records, interest inventories,
spelling inventories, observation, conversation, anecdotal notes, parent input, etc.
• Continually review groups and move students based on analysis of assessment data
• Plan groups with differentiated learning opportunities by assigning groups around specific learning goals versus ALWAYS using ability to group students
• Effective grouping means students receive the instruction that they most need next to meet the standards
57
SERC 2010
Flexible Grouping:Should be purposeful: May be based on student interest, learning profile and/or readiness May be based on needs observed during learning times
Implementation: Purposefully plan using information collected – interest surveys, learning
profile inventories, exit cards, quick writes, observations, etc. List groups on an overhead; place in folders or mailboxes “On the fly” as invitational groups
Cautions: Avoid turning groups into tracking situations Provide opportunities for students to work within a variety of groups Practice moving into group situations and assuming roles within the group
58
SERC 2010
Some Guiding Questions:• Is the focus on meaningful instruction vs. tasks in isolation?• Do the activities selected reinforce/extend current
knowledge? Are the activities related to the learning goal? • Will students enjoy? Will students be successful? Can
students do independently? Do students understand the management procedures?
• Are options available to accommodate interests/ abilities of all students? Are there increasing levels of challenge?
• Does the environment allow for easy transitioning?• Can student work be documented?
59
Why?• To lower
student/teacher ratio• To foster participation
in discussions• To monitor students
more closely
When?• As new topics are
introduced• To review for tests,
drill and practice, or re-teaching a topic
Parallel Teaching
Planning for Parallel Teaching
Determine:• what objective/concept• what materials (same/different)• how students will be grouped• how much time for the lesson• will there be large group sharing• what sponge or backup activity will
be used if groups don’t finish at same time
Parallel Planning Worksheet
GROUP AObjective/concept:
Materials:
Students:
GROUP BObjective/concept:
Materials:
Students:
Sharing activity: Sponge: SERC
Why?• If a small group of
students needs remediation
• For enrichment• For assessment
purposes• If mastery of a
concept varies
When?• “Flu” group• Friday review• Pre-teaching
Alternative Teaching
Planning for Alternative
Determine:• why there is a need • which students need to be in the
small group
• what objective/concept will be covered in each group
• when, how long
Alternative Planning Worksheet
Large GroupObjective/concept:
Materials:
Students:
Alternative Group
Objective/concept:
Materials:
Students:
Sponge: SERC
Why?• To demonstrate
interaction to students (role playing, modeling)
When?• Teachers have a high
sense of comfort working together
Teaming
Planning for Team Teaching
Determine:• what objective/concept • what impact from “Power of 2”• when, how long
A Definition for Differentiation
In the context of education, wedefine differentiation as ateacher’s reacting responsively to a learner’s needs…The goal of a differentiated classroom is maximum student growth and individual success.
Tomlinson & Allan, 2002
4 Corners
Corners: • Station Teaching• Parallel Teaching• Alternative Teaching• Teaming
Now, choose a corner.
4 Corners
In groups, discuss these questions: • How does this approach look in practice?• How do you currently differentiate to meet students
needs when using this co-teaching approach?
Teams Review:Share the main ideas of your conversations and
post them on chart paper..
Topics for Co-Teachers to Discuss
• Instructional content and expectations for students
• Planning, including time to do it and who does which part
• Instructional format, including who will do which part of the instructional delivery
• Parity, or how it will be clear that both educators have the same status in the classroom
• Space, related to both students and teachers
More Topics to Discuss
• Noise and each educator’s tolerance for it
• Instructional routines• Organizational routines• The definition of “help”• Discipline procedures for the
classroom• Safety matters (e.g., for students
with hearing impairments)• Feedback, including when and how to
discuss issues with each other
And More Topics
• Student evaluation, including grading• Teacher chores such as grading,
duplicating, assignment preparation, and so on
• Responsibilities and procedures for substitutes
• Confidentiality• Pet Peeves
Lessons Learned
• The goals of planning should shift from focusing on covering the curriculum to focusing on student learning the curriculum.
• Adaptation for students with disabilities should be considered as part of the broader challenge of responding to the academic diversity within a class.
Lessons Learned
• Administrative support is essential.• Alignment of special education and general
education begins with the planning process. It is the combination of the two perspectives that enriches the instructional environment for all.
Co-Planning
• Use a template for planning• Have regularly scheduled meetings,
rather than “fitting it in.”• Stay focused• Review content in advance of meeting• Set Goals – Learners – Strategies • Make plans for instruction, establish timelines
and priorities, assign preparation tasks
Weekly Scheduling Co-Planning Time
• Co-teaching teams should have a minimum of one scheduling/planning period (45–60 minutes) per week.
• Experienced teams should spend10 minutes to plan each lesson.
Dieker, 2001; Walther-Thomas, Bryant, & Land, 1996
All students can learn, however not all students should be expected to learn everything and not at the same time.
Unit Planning
What are the essential
understandings that all students need to know?
What content should
most students know?
What content could
some students know?KU-CRL
BLOOM’S REVISED TAXONOMY
CreatingGenerating new ideas, products, or ways of viewing things
Designing, constructing, planning, producing, inventing.
EvaluatingJustifying a decision or course of action
Checking, hypothesising, critiquing, experimenting, judging
AnalyzingBreaking information into parts to explore understandings and relationships
Comparing, organizing, deconstructing, interrogating, finding
ApplyingUsing information in another familiar situationImplementing, carrying out, using, executing
UnderstandingExplaining ideas or concepts
Interpreting, summarizing, paraphrasing, classifying, explaining
RememberingRecalling information
Recognizing, listing, describing, retrieving, naming, finding
Knowledge CategoriesCategory Definition and Examples
Fact A specific detail; verifiable information or data e.g. The capital of New York is Albany.
Concept A class of things; a category with common elements e.g. capital, city, nation
Principle A fundamental truth, law , rule, or doctrine that explains the relationship between 2 or more conceptse.g. Social, political, and geographic factors influence the location of a capital city.
Skill A proficiency, ability or technique; strategy, method or tool e.g. Locate capital cities using longitude & latitude.
Attitude A belief, disposition, appreciation, or value e.g. Develop an appreciation for the cultural heritage of selected capital cities.
Problem Solving, Transfer and Application
The ability to use knowledge to address a goal that may not be immediately understandable. e.g. Examination of issues that might arise when a capital needs to be relocated
Hilda Taba
Levels of Learning
Facts - Monet was an ImpressionistConcepts - perspectivePrinciples - objects can be viewed through a variety of perspectivesAttitudes - I prefer realism to abstractSkills - Present realistic and impressionistic views of an object.
“If you want to find out what students know and can apply, complex performances are required.” Alan November
Please call if you have any questions:(860) 632-1485
Michelle LeBrun-Griffin X321 [email protected] H. Zytka X363 [email protected]
Thank You!
PLANNING TOOLS
25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT 06457-1520 · (860) 632-1485
Connecticut State Department of Education · Division of Educational Programs and Services
National Professional Resources, Inc.2006 Third Edition$19.95
http://www.nprinc.com/co-teach/ctlp.htm
CO-TEACHING DAILY LESSON PLANS Teachers ________________________________ Subjects __________________________
Date What are you going to teach?
Which co-teaching technique will you use?
What are the tasks of both teachers?
What materials are needed?
How will you evaluate learning?
Information about students who need follow-up work
Vaughn
What Is Backward Design?• Backward Design is a process of lesson planning created by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe and
introduced in Understanding by Design (1998).
• This lesson design process concentrates on developing the lesson in a different order than in traditional lesson planning.
TraditionalTopicsActivitiesAssessments
Backward Design THREE STAGESGoals & objectivesAssessmentsActivities
Identify desired results.
Determine acceptable evidence.
Plan learning experiences and instruction.
Wiggins, G & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/198199/chapter1.html
3 Stages of “Backward” Design
• Stage 1: IDENTIFY DESIRED RESULTS. (What are the big ideas?)
• Stage 2: DETERMINE ACCEPTABLE EVIDENCE.(How do you know that students have mastered the objectives and goals? What’s the evidence?)
• Stage 3: PLAN LEARNING EXPERIENCES AND INSTRUCTION.
(How will we get there?)
How can I use numbers, lists, classifications, logic, scientific inquiry?
How can I use language (stories, poems, readers’ theater)?
How can I use partners or cooperative group activities?
How can I use elements of the natural world (flora, fauna, etc)?
How can I use movement or hands-on activities?
How can I use music, rhythm, songs, raps, chants, or instruments?
How can I provide choices or involve personal memories or feelings?
How can I use visualization, art, colors, or metaphors?
Multiple Intelligences Unit Planning Guide
Mathematical-Logical
Spati
al
Intrapersonal
MusicalLinguistic
Bodily/KinestheticInterpersonal N
aturalist
4MAT Cycle of Learning
Connect
Imagine
Inform
Practice
Extend
Perform
Refine
Refl
ectio
nA
cti
on
Introductions and Brainstorm on Decisions
Realities of Planning
Variety of Planning Tools
Design and implement a learning experience using one of the formats from tonight; reflect and assess impact on teaching
Round Table &
Stand and Share
Story
Complete a web, 4MAT cycle, and Unit Organizer
Read sections of books (First Day and DI)
Explore given web sites and answer questions on WebCT Attend
Bernice McCarthy, Ph.D.
NAMEDATEThe Unit Organizer BIGGER PICTURE
LAST UNIT /Experience CURRENT UNIT NEXT UNIT /Experience U
NIT
SEL
F-TE
ST
QU
ESTI
ON
S
is about...
UN
IT
RELATION
SHIPS
UNIT SCHEDULE UNIT MAP
CURRENT UNIT1 32
4
5
6
7
8
KU-CRL