man op tugas 1 ex business process reengineering
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Man op tugas 1 ex business process reengineering](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022100803/5a65ee597f8b9aaf638b6117/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Example ofBusiness Process
ImprovementBy Martin Smith
Contact Martin Smith at [email protected].
Abstract: This project is an example of business processimprovement, or re-engineering as it is sometimes called. Thecorporation was not radically re-structured; instead, onedepartment achieved significant gains in efficiency andquality of service by re-designing several processes. A smallteam of front-line supervisors and managers did the designwork and then carried out the implementation of the newprocess design. Two internal consultants supported the team.The project was characterized by a disciplined approach,strong executive support and quantified results.
![Page 2: Man op tugas 1 ex business process reengineering](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022100803/5a65ee597f8b9aaf638b6117/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Situation: The setting was the Accounting Department of a local telephone company.The department had about 500 employees. Most were assigned to two work centers. 3.5million bills were issued each month to business and residence customers.
Critical Business Issue: Reduce expenses by 8-10% in each of the next five years.
Intervention: Re-design the CASH PROCESS. This process involves receipt of thecustomer’s payment, crediting the customer’s account and depositing the amount in thecompany’s account.
Exhibit 1. Relationship Map Specific to Cash Process
RevenueAccounting
Office
Customers
PaymentAgents
Bank
CorporateData
Center
InformationSystemsSupportGroup
PublicCommuni-
cations
CustomerServiceCenters
CentralCash Unit
Corporatebooks
Treasury
Regional Telephone Company
Local Telephone Company
Accounting Department
Refunds
Refund DataBalanceSheet Data
Coin Collections
Dishonored Checks
UnidentifiedPayments
InvestigationRequestsInvestigation
Requests
Investigation Requests
Inquiries
Payments
Payments
Dishonored Checks
UnidentifiedPayments
DishonoredChecks
Inquiries
DataCorrections
CashSummary
ErrorReports
Notify of Outof Balance
Proof forCashSummary
![Page 3: Man op tugas 1 ex business process reengineering](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022100803/5a65ee597f8b9aaf638b6117/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Exhibit 2. Schedule for Design Phase
Project Activity
1. Train the Team
2. Plan the Project
3. Prepare Relationship Map
4. Build IS Map
5. Identify Disconnects
6. Patch or Re-design?
7. Define Attributes
8. Build SHOULD Map
9. Specify Measures
10. Stakeholder Review
12. Revise
13. Formulate Recommendations
14. Decide What to Implement
���������������������������
���������������������������
������������������������
������������������������������������������������������
������������������������������
������������������������������������
��������������������������������������������������������������������
���������������������������������
������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
������������������������������������������������
���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
Week
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Start: Sept 17
End: Dec 15
17
NOTE: The Project Team worked full time for 4 weeks and part time for 10 weeks.
![Page 4: Man op tugas 1 ex business process reengineering](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022100803/5a65ee597f8b9aaf638b6117/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Exhibit 3. Flowchart for Sub-Process, Dishonored Checks, BEFORE the Re-design
NOTE. Do not try to read the content of the process steps but rather understand the diagramming conventions.Rows represent work groups or computer systems. Boxes indicate steps where work is performed. Diamonds aredecision points. Lines crossing the boundaries between rows represent hand-offs from one function to another.Compare Exhibit 7 to Exhibit 3. The old design had 50 steps compared to the 24 steps in the new design.
Bank
CentralCash Unit
Ca shO pe ration
Da ta EntryGroup
Com pute rRoo m
Custome rser viceCente r
Systems
Di shonored CheckRec eived from
Customer's Bank
1
End3 Bank Fi les
Updated
24
Correct 32 Process
Payment
47
OurCus tomer
?
2
Residentof XYZState?
4PrepareForm toRe-bil l
Cus tomer
6 PrepareForm toAdjust
Customer'sAccount
7Enter
Adjus tmenti nto Busi nessOffice Support
System
12
SystemCorrectlyUpdated?
14
CorrectError
16 AlertService
Rep
17Dai ly Cash
Sheets (Form508) Prepared
to ReflectDi shonored
Checks
19
Mai l Copy20 Fi le
di shonoredChecks
21 Bal anceDai lyBank
Statement
30
Bal ance?
31
End33
Pul lCheck andCal l Bank
41Funds
Available?
43Enter Note in
Busi nessOffice Support
System
44Enter Notein BOSS
andPrepareMemoCard
45
Mai lCheck toCus tomer
46
PrepareTransactionForm 770
5
Re-bal anceForm 508's
26Batch508's
27 Veri fyPrintout
29PrintoutCorrect?
34CorrectErrors
35
Key Data8
DataKeyed
28Transmit
BatchLi st ing
36
Execute9
ExecuteRun 1
37
ContactCus tomer
18Re-
deposit?
38 CheckReturned
?
39
End40
ContactCus tomerto Resol ve
50
ServiceOrder
System
10Busi ness
Office SupportSystem
15Busi ness
Off iceSupportSystem
48Busi ness
Off iceSupportSystem
49Cash
System
51
No
Check
Yes No
Yes
Form
Transact ion Ticket
Electroni c Tran smission
Electroni c Tran smission
Acco untDebi t
No
Yes
Correct ion
Upda ted Custom erAccount Data
Form 508
B atchedForms
Daily Bank Stat ement
No
Yes
No
Yes
Printout
Corrections
No
Yes
No
Mem o Card
No
Yes
Yes
ElectronicMe ssage
Noti ficatio n to Return Custom er Check
![Page 5: Man op tugas 1 ex business process reengineering](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022100803/5a65ee597f8b9aaf638b6117/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Exhibit 7. Flowchart for Sub-Process, Dishonored Checks, AFTER the Re-design
Cycle Time
Ba nk,Payment
Proce ssingAgent, orEle ctronic
FundsTransfe r
CashOperation
Data EntryGroup
Compute rRoom
Treasury
Systems
DishonoredCheck
Received
1 CheckPresented
Second Timefor Payment
2
ReturnedAgain?
3Can
Check BeAuto-
debited?
4
DebitsListed
5 Checks &Listing
Forwarded
6
End7
CustomerAccountDebited
9Total
Entered onDai ly
Worksheet
12Data Enteredinto BusinessOffice Support
System
13Dai lyBank
StatementBalanced
17
StatementsFiled
18 Res identof XYZState?
19$5 ChargeDebited toCustomer's
Account
20
End21
Run 1Executed
10 Batch ListingTransmitted
22
Run AB01Executed
23
BalancePosted toTreasury
Dai lyReport
14
End15
CashSystem
11 BusinessOffice
SupportSystem
16CustomerRecord
InfoSystem
24
No
Yes
No
Yes
Check
ElectronicTransaction
Data
ListList andCheck s
Work sheetData
No
Yes
List
Batch
(7 Days) (1 Day) (1 Day)
![Page 6: Man op tugas 1 ex business process reengineering](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022100803/5a65ee597f8b9aaf638b6117/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Exhibit 4. Categories of Disconnects (total of 62)
• Duplication of effort• Steps that should be performed by other departments• Discrepancies between the two processing centers• Unnecessary steps• Cycle time delays• Opportunities for automation.
Exhibit 5. Categories of Recommendations (total of 32)
• Automation of manual activities• Work elimination• Transfer of responsibilities and personnel from one department to another• Job redesign• Measurement plan for tracking process performance• Documentation of work procedures• Training to cover the new procedures• Re-arrangement of the work force
Exhibit 6. Design Attributes for “Dishonored Checks” Sub-process
Element Attributes
Inputs • Automatic check debiting• All checks processed twice by the bank• Non-company check volume reduced
Processing • No re-depositing of checks• Fewer hand-offs• Manual forms eliminated
Outputs • Debit reflected ASAP• “Uncollectables” reduced
![Page 7: Man op tugas 1 ex business process reengineering](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022100803/5a65ee597f8b9aaf638b6117/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Implementation: 29 of the 32 recommendations were implemented within 12months of the executive decision to proceed. A year-to-year comparison yieldedthe following results.
Exhibit 8. Results
Measure Result
Process Steps • 44% Reduction from 422 to237 steps
Manually Processed Payments • 90% reduction from 42,000 to4,000 per month
Unplaced cash (payment cannotbe credited to an account)
• 43% reduction
Customer Queries aboutprocessing of payment
• 44% reduction
Force • 45% fewer employees assignedto Cash process
Operating Expense • $930,000 reduction in annualexpense
Postscript: the General Manager commissioned another project at the time thisproject entered the implementation phase. Over the next two years, two additionalprojects were undertaken. Together, these projects encompassed about 75% of thedepartment’s work activity.
![Page 8: Man op tugas 1 ex business process reengineering](https://reader038.vdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022100803/5a65ee597f8b9aaf638b6117/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Exhibit 9. Lessons According to the Project Team
• Start with a small process, something that can be done in a short timeframe.• Set clear time lines. Keep them firm. Keep short intervals between target dates.
This policy reinforces accountabilities and maintains momentum of the project.• Don’t dissipate resources over too many projects. Limit the organization to
two projects at one time, one in design and the other in implementation.• Include key stakeholders on the project team. Work units responsible for the
process must be represented on the team. The staff who maintain the supportingcomputer systems should also be represented.
• Focus on short term pay-offs. Pay-offs should be quantified in terms offinancial, cycle time and customer service results.
• Use a PC for all flowcharting and documentation. Capture entries on the PCwhile the team is working out the design on the easel. Edit the draft off-line.
• Manage the on-going process immediately. Don’t wait for all the changes tobe implemented. Collect measurement data as soon as practical. Scheduleprocess reviews as part of the GM’s staff meeting at least once a month.
Exhibit 10. Lessons According to the Author
• The support of the General Manager and the senior management team wasessential. They enforced strict adherence to the project schedule. They attendedthe same training as the team. They met at decision points with the projectteam. The GM initiated quarterly sessions with all management andrepresentative non-management personnel to review the status of each ofseveral processes. Measurement trends and improvement plans were reviewedfor each process.
• Any given change effort requires coordination with other change efforts toensure adequate resources.
• Another alignment issue was the coordination of the process change withdepartmental strategy on one hand, and job-level design on the other hand.
Further Information:
Bisson, B., Folk, V. and Smith, M.E. (2000). Case study: How to do a businessprocess improvement. Quality and Participation, 23 (1), pp. 58-63.
www.stractics.com