managing and reporting unanticipated problems including … · 2017. 5. 15. · managing and...

34
Managing and Reporting Unanticipated Problems Including Adverse Events Elizabeth L. Hohmann MD Chair, and Physician Director, Partners IRBs Sarah A. White MPH Director, Partners QI Program 1

Upload: others

Post on 20-Feb-2021

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Managing and Reporting Unanticipated Problems Including

    Adverse Events

    Elizabeth L. Hohmann MDChair, and Physician Director, Partners IRBs

    Sarah A. White MPHDirector, Partners QI Program

    1

  • Today’s objectives

    • Unanticipated Events

    – Definition

    – Reporting Timeline

    • What do you tell the IRB, including changes to your protocol?

    • Cases/examples

    – Is the event reportable?

    – How and to whom should it be reported?

    2

  • What are ‘Other Events’?

    • New information that occurs during the conduct of the research study.

    – Adverse events

    – Interim analysis, DSMB report

    – Investigational Drug/Device Brochure

    – New package Insert or FDA notice

    – Protocol Exception

    – Unanticipated Problem (UAP’s)

    – Other information (not a UAP)3

  • 4

  • Adverse Event (AE)

    vs.

    Unanticipated Problem (UAP)

    5

  • • Adverse Event:

    – Untoward or unfavorable medical

    occurrence

    – Can be physical or psychological

    • Serious Adverse Event:

    – Death

    – Hospitalization

    – Prolonged hospitalization

    – Disability/permanent damage

    – Congenital anomaly/birth defect

    – “Other impt medical event” • Drug addiction, Seizures, Serious blood dyscrasia, Bronchospasm

    necessitating ED visit or ICU admit 6

  • What are Unanticipated Problems?

    • Something that happens in your research study that you didn’t expect

    – In nature, frequency, or severity

    • Is related to the research

    • Places subjects or others at increased risk than was previously known

    – Risk = Physical, Psychological, Economic, Legal, Social

    7

  • AE vs. UAP

    http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/advevntguid.html 8

  • Is it related to your study drug, device, or intervention?

    • Temporally related

    • More likely than not

    • No other reasonable explanation

    • Physician believes it to be related

    • Outside of expected disease progression

    • “Can’t rule out” an association is probably too soft a call!

    • Make a “Clinical Global Impression!”

    9

  • General examples of UAPs• Breech of confidentiality

    • Serious subject complaint

    • Medication or laboratory error (even if no harm)

    • DSMB report or publication that indicates new risks or less benefit

    • Change in FDA status (e.g. recall, warning, black box)

    • Incarceration of subject

    • Noncompliance with federal law (483, FDA Warning letter)

    • Suspension of the research study

    • Scientific misconduct

    • Deviation from protocol (WITH harm, or needed to prevent harm)

    • Any other problem that indicates the research places subjects at increased risk

    10

  • Is the event reportable?

    • 3 questions:

    – Is the event unexpected?

    – Is it related/possibly related to participation in research?

    – Does the event suggest that the research places subjects/others at greater risk of harm than previously known/suspected?

    11

    Reminder: external SAEs

  • Why do you have to report UAPs to the IRB?

    • Unexpected problems or new information may indicate that the research places subjects (or others) at increased risk of harm– Are risks still reasonable in relation to benefit?

    – Are changes warranted in order to protect subjects or others

    • We have a policy because the feds say we have to (45 CFR 46, 21 CFR 56)– In cases where UAP is of very serious nature: If the study is federally

    funded or FDA regulated, the IRB is required to report UAPs to appropriate federal agency

    12

  • When are UAPs reported?

    • Report within 5 working days/7 calendar days of investigator being notified

    • Report problems that occur:

    – During conduct of study

    – After study completion

    – After subject withdrawal/completion

    • Insight: reported as an ‘other event’

    Within reasonable medical timeframe

  • What do you need to report to the IRB?

    • A detailed description of the event

    • Basis for determining:

    – The event was unexpected in nature, severity, or frequency

    – The event was related

    – The research places subjects at an increased risk

    • Corrective action/Preventive measures

    • What changes need to be made as a result

    – Note: an amendment can be noted as “planned.”

    14

  • What might you consider changing?

    • Inclusion/exclusion criteria

    • Safety follow up timeframe and/or procedures

    – i.e. additional clinical or lab monitoring needed?

    • Information regarding new risks to previously enrolled subjects (e.g. information sheet)

    • How you might inform new subjects

    • Suspension of enrollment of new subjects

    • Stop drug dosing in all

    • Suspension of overall study

    15

  • Best practices: identifying and reporting UAPs

    • Ensure staff is adequately trained

    • Ensure subjects are well informed of what they are getting into

    • Adequate subject follow up

    • Routine monitoring

    • If a UAP occurs:– Meet IRB reporting timelines, even if it means

    submitting a preliminary report followed by F/U report

    – Ensure documentation in subject files can be understood from a 3rd party perspective

    16

  • Cases/Examples

    Actual submissions/issues brought to the Partners IRBs.

    17

  • Case 1.

    • You’re writing a letter to a subject to reschedule their Echo because of a snow storm

    • Neither you nor they were in that day. • They will be 2 days outside of the study visit

    window.

    Do NOT send this in to us as an other event!Keep a copy in your file, and record as a minor

    deviation. Minor deviations reported in tabular format at CR

    18

  • Case 2.

    • Subject has significant allergy to iodinated CT contrast and you wish to do an MRA with gadolinium instead. The sponsor has agreed to this.

    • This is a prospective exception request. • You should get IRB and sponsor approval,

    prospectively. • Renal function? MRI screen criteria? • Reporting this after the fact as a deviation is NOT

    advised. • Consent needs to be considered/discussed.

    19

  • Case 3.

    • You’ve lost a video with a psychotherapy visit discussing depression and sexual orientation.

    • Unanticipated problem – potential risks to subject.• Notify the IRB AND the Privacy Office, ASAP.• MGH: Erika Barber JD, Privacy Office.• BWH: Privacy Office

    – Katherine Li Greene or Christopher McAllister – Also: Jackie Raymond, Exec. Director of Health Info

    Email: [email protected] Call: (617) 582-5214

    • We’ll ask you how you’ll avoid this going forward• NB: Privacy breaches may trigger HIPAA monetary fines

    and timelines. 20

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Case 4.

    • Patient becomes pregnant on an investigational drug with teratogenic potential.

    – Uncovered on study-mandated hCG testing

    – Double contraception needs clearly spelled out

    • ? Unanticipated?

    – Sponsor needs to know

    – Action needs be planned

    – Follow-up of child, if applicable?

    – Resolution of situation must be made

    21

  • Case 5

    • Computer algorithm error has erroneously sent patients assigned to active drug placebo on month 2 of the study!

    • Clearly a UAP.

    • Risks to subjects – probably not but could be

    • Risks to study data – major

    • How will study be “fixed”

    • What will subjects be told???

    22

  • Case 6

    • John Scott and John Smith are scheduled to come in on the same day for your study.

    • Mr. Smith calls from New Hampshire after the visit to say he’s got a pill bottle that says John Scott! What should he do?

    • Clearly a UAP.

    • Risks to subjects? – potentially.

    • Risks to study data – minor, he caught it for you….

    • How will you prevent this from happening again?

    • Analysis and corrective action plan is needed!

    • Contact Pharmacy.

    • Submit a hospital safety report?

  • Case 7

    • Subject with heart failure on orthopedic study related to knee OA is hospitalized for MI and dies.

    • Not related to arthrocentesis 3 mo ago!

    • Insight won’t let me report but sponsor is insisting I do!

    • Reportable event per protocol/sponsor!

    • Explain in detail why unrelated

    24

  • Case 8.

    • You receive a call from an employer who witnessed phlebotomy in the back seat of a car in “his” parking lot.

    • Employee reluctantly gave your name and contact information when pressed.

    • Complaint that can’t be resolved?

    • This person may have contacted IRB already.

    25

  • Case 9.

    • Post op ketimine study – drug bag found to be running at thrice the rate prescribed in study.

    • IRB notified by hospital when Safety Report submitted by RN.

    • “Near Miss” situation

    • Timeliness of reporting.

    • Look back/root cause analysis/fix going forward

    • Hospital Safety AND the IRB need to be involved.

    26

  • Case 10.

    • DVT in study of bariatric surgery.• ICF clearly describes DVT as possible risk, high

    risk population.• Out pt eval and sent home with LMW heparin

    • Did it prolong hospitalization? • Did it require another hospitalization?• What about ED Obs overnight? • Trackable event, but may not be SAE. • Review protocol. Ask sponsor. Your call!

    27

  • Case 11

    • New catheter based valve study

    • Patient has small arterial lac, but bleeds 2 units on the table – all’s well that ends well…

    • Pt confesses he forgot to stop coumadin

    • Yes it’s a UAP.

    • Check definition of bleed/serious bleed

    • Can you document that you reminded him?

    • Was there any pre-procedure testing?

    28

  • Case 12.

    • Dr. was away at meetings/vacation in Europe for 2 weeks. Returns, and is reviewing study files and finds apparently forged signature and date when she was out of the country.

    • Needs IRB report.

    • Needs scientific misconduct investigation!

    • Needs report to FDA, OHRP, NIH (if applicable) if substantiated. Prelim report likely will be made.

    29

  • Case 13

    • BWH is a coordinating center for study of a nutritional supplement in a neurological ds.

    • East Overshoe Hospital can’t get it together and enrollment is being stopped at the site.

    • Investigator reports this to the IRB, FDA, and OHRP.

    Nastygram arrives from NIH – program officer left off the CC list!

    TRIUMVIRATE of federal reporting is OHRP, NIH and FDA – include them all. More is better.

  • Direct complaints to IRB

    • TNTC recruitment matters• Privacy concerns• Unprofessional behaviors• Enrolled demented persons• Unapproved documents• Parent is a scientist and….• Not aware of some key component of study• Hospital safety reports/colleagues concerns

    – Trainees?

    • Funder’s concerns/requirements – NIH either via program or DSMBs

    31

  • Don’t forget to send us:

    • Safety pause to enrollment

    • Results of planned interim analyses

    • DSMB reports/findings

    • Follow-up reporting on actions taken to protect a subject, if not clearly described in protocol already.

    – Potassium is 6 and no plan for that

    – Do what you need to do, but report after

    32

  • Thank you for attending! Questions?

    Please tell us what worked and what didn’t!

    33

  • 34