managing the deteriorating patient from a nurse practitioner led rapid response team perspective

37
Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response Team perspective Anna Green Manager ICU Liaison service Critical Care Nurse Practitioner

Upload: informa-australia

Post on 07-May-2015

1.512 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


9 download

DESCRIPTION

Anna Green, Manager – ICU Liaison Team, Western Health delivered this presentation at the 2013 Managing the Deteriorating Patient conference. The management of patients in clinical deterioration has become a chief concern for Australian hospitals, with a patient’s potential for deterioration existing in every hospital ward and health service across the country. This annual event focusses on improving education for staff caring for these patients, and improving the policies and protocols in place to maintain patient safety. For more information, please visit the event website: www.healthcareconferences.com.au/deterioratingpatients

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Nurse Practitioner

led Rapid Response

Team perspective

Anna Green

Manager ICU Liaison service

Critical Care Nurse Practitioner

Page 2: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

2013 ICU Liaison Team

• Gary Blackburn

– Lead Deteriorating Patient Rounding

• Grace Campbell

– Lead Sustainable ISBAR

• Nicola Donohoe

– Lead ICU Discharge and follow up guideline

• Michelle Kreusel

– Lead Join the Dots and RRT survey

• Greg Millsom

• Rom Binuya

Page 3: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Chameleon

• Highly specialised

• Colour changing abilities

• Three dimensional vision

• Specialised feet

• Long tongue

Page 4: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

In the beginning....

• High demand for ICU beds

• Ward patients with complex care

• Admitted to ICU with preventable causes

• Delay in treating deteriorating patients

• High transfer rate over the weekend

Solution

• Case manage

patients post ICU

discharge

• To prevent

readmissions

Page 5: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Non Stop Small Challenges

• Complex care course

• Pager

• Grants – computer

• Office – store room

• Title change

• Reporting change

Page 6: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Non Stop Big Challengers: 3 months post commencement

• Ward referrals for deteriorating patients

• Ramp up calls – closed door culture

• Ordering diagnostic tests

• Prescribing medications

Nurse Practitioner journey started in 1998 through to endorsement in 2004

RAT

Page 7: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

1. 1999 Leadership Development • All RRTs have calling criteria

• Usually based on deranged vital signs

– Difficulty breathing

– RR > 30

– SpO2 < 90% despite high flow oxygen

– HR > 120 bpm

– Systolic BP < 90 mmHg

– UO < 60mL over 2 hours

• Staff “worried” about the patient

Page 8: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

2. Nurse Practitioner –phase 2 external evaluation: La Trobe University (MDS)

Patient Activities

• Health assessment

• Referral – future planning

• Intervention

• Diagnostic tests

• Prescribing

• Decision

Non Patient Activities

• Education of staff

• Consultation with health professionals

• Documenting visits

Page 9: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

External evaluation continued

Consumer focus group • Role confusion • Education provided • Need 24hr service • Comparisons made with

junior doctors – Better understanding of

nursing care – Better rapport with nurses – In some cases more

knowledgeable than doctors

Stakeholder focus group • Anticipation of some

conflict of role definition • They would be more

credible with education qualifications

• Robust analysis of outcome data relating to implementation of the service

Page 10: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

2012 Nurse Practitioners in Australia

128

12

179

185

27

94

18

67

Total = 714 (0.21%) nurse practitioners

Page 11: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Footer Text 11

Improvement projects along the way

Patient at risk scoring tool

Colour alerts in medical records

ISBAR communication

Join the dots

Riskman rapid response entries

Page 12: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

ICU Liaison Patient at Risk Scoring Tool

• RFD from ICU

• ICU follow up

• Repeat reviews

• Discharge from caseload

• Preventable readmissions

Page 13: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective
Page 14: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Footer Text 14

ISBAR Communication

1. VMIA – lead agency

Sessions >42 Participants >350

2. Sustainability

Orientation (monthly) Incorporated into handover/clinical skills/medical

education sessions 3. ISBAR A3 Improvement Project

Audit / education Improved compliance of using ISBAR form

Page 15: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Footer Text 15

Documentation Documentation

14:25 Nursing notes on the ward

15:30 Admitted to ICU with APO secondary to severe MR

Page 16: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective
Page 17: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Footer Text 17

Issues:

1. Use of numbers vs joining dots

2. Incorrect recording in wrong space

3. Confusion where to put dot in square

4. Tds observations

5. Escalation protocol not followed

6. Reportable vital signs not recognised

7. Failure to recognise deterioration

Page 18: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

18

Page 19: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

And the story continues...

Simulation scenarios Colour alerts

Page 20: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Footer Text 20

RRT entry

Page 21: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Footer Text 21

Odd one out

Page 22: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Victorian Travelling Fellowship Program

Victorian

Travelling

Fellowship

Program

Page 23: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Footer Text 23

Methodology

England (10)

Pre survey sent to hospitals in England

Site visits to the hospitals in England

Research reports returned for verification

Australia (10)

Preliminary survey sent to hospitals in Victoria

Hello is anyone else out there!

Page 24: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Comparison of Hospital demographics

England Victoria

Hospital bed size 772 315

ICU bed size 19 15

ICU admissions / year 1137 1243

Pts assessed / day 10 7

• 80% of the hospitals visited in England had designated high dependency beds on the general wards that are not managed by the ICU compared to 12% of the hospitals in Victoria.

• One hospital in Victoria had established an ICU LN service in a metropolitan hospital without an ICU.

Page 25: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Footer Text 25

Key findings

All nurse led rapid response teams vs 1

65% used weighted score model

Average number of staff = 7 vs 1.8

90% worked 50% clinical & 50% non-clinical

65% covered 24hrs per day

100% ordered diagnostic tests

Majority had standing orders

Page 26: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Footer Text 26

What has been the biggest impact

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Page 27: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

ACCCN SIG – ICU Liaison

• Support

• Communication

• Meetings

• Research

• Sharing information

• Position statement

Page 28: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Secondment to DoH

• 3 month secondment

• Sent to CEOs

• Every hospital with an ICU in Victoria has an ICU liaison role!

Page 29: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Footer Text 29

Marked increase in ICU LN services from 2004

More than 120,000 patients were reviewed, most commonly after ICU

discharge

Little increase in the EFT for ICU LN services

Many hospitals revealed increased ICU LN workload with time.

Considerable differences in all measured variables between hospitals.

Page 30: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Footer Text 30

Rounding Project

1. 2hrly rounding to each ward at both Western and Sunshine hospitals

2. Developed an audit tool

3. Education provided re clinical marker criteria. Inform NUMs of the

rounding project

4. Commenced rounding in the emergency departments

5. Energize and motivate ICU liaison nurse consultants

Page 31: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Footer Text 31

Average 51 / 42 increase in referrals

APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR

Rounding 46 59 50 39 21 32

RRT calls 36 41 38 47 28 42 11 15 23 23 19 28

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70A

xis

Titl

e

Sunshine RRT / Rounding referrals

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

Rounding 70 61 67 44 28 38

RRT calls 56 88 58 64 75 69 67 74 88 95 95 96

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Axi

s Ti

tle

Western RRT / Rounding referrals

Decreased ICU ward

admissions

Decreased mortality from

unplanned ward admissions

Decreased code blue calls

Page 32: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Footer Text 32

ICU Discharge Follow up Criteria

Page 33: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Footer Text 33 33

ICU Liaison Nurse Role

1. Assess patients in the ICU prior to discharge and write a

comprehensive assessment using patient at risk score.

2. Provide follow up service for patients leaving ICU who meet ICU

follow up discharge criteria

3. Provide a nurse-led rapid response team review for

deteriorating patients

4. Minimum daily rounding to emergency departments and all

clinical areas at WH and SH

Page 34: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Footer Text 34

2012 ICU Liaison service review

Follow up

Deteriorating Patient

Referrals

Extensions to practice Nurse

Practitioner

Travelling Fellowship

Patient Rounding

Page 35: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Footer Text 35

What's left to do?

Position statement

National KPIs

National database

National reporting

Outpatient service

Page 36: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective

Nearly there!

24 Hour coverage business case

Page 37: Managing the Deteriorating Patient from a Nurse Practitioner led Rapid Response team perspective