managing the hyperglycemia of diabetes:...

43
MANAGING THE HYPERGLYCEMIA OF DIABETES: SHOULD CVOTs IMPACT MEDICATIONS? Ralph A. DeFronzo, M.D. Professor of Medicine Chief, Diabetes Division University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, Texas

Upload: ledung

Post on 05-Jul-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

MANAGING THE HYPERGLYCEMIA OF

DIABETES: SHOULD CVOTs IMPACT MEDICATIONS?

Ralph A. DeFronzo, M.D.Professor of Medicine

Chief, Diabetes DivisionUniversity of Texas Health

Science CenterSan Antonio, Texas

HYPERGLYCEMIA AND MICROVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS

Retinopathy Nephropathy

Neuropathy

UKPDS: EPIDEMIOLOGIC ANALYSIS –MICROVASCULAR ENDPOINTS

Stratton et al, BMJ 321:405-412, 2000

HbA1C (%)

Haz

ard

Rat

io

1

1037% decrease per 1% reduction in HbA1C

P<0.0001

5 6 7 8 9 10

adjusted for age, sex, smoking,albuminuria, BP, LDL, HDL, TG

5

MACROVASCULAR DISEASE*

Heart attack

Stroke

PVD (Amputation)*accounts for ~80% of all mortality in T2DM

NDDG; Diabetes in America, 1995

WHAT ROLE DOES HYPERGLYCEMIA PLAY IN THE PATHOGENESIS OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS

IN T2DM?

Stratton et al, BMJ 321:405-412, 2000

UKPDS: EPIDEMIOLOGIC ANALYSIS –CARDIOVASCULAR ENDPOINTS

HbA1C (%)

Haz

ard

Rat

io

MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

1

1014% decrease per 1%

reduction in HbA1C

P<0.0001

5 6 7 8 9 10

5 2.2

STROKE

1

1012% decrease per 1%

reduction in HbA1C

P<0.035

5 6 7 8 9 10

5 1.8

UKPDS, Lancet 352:837-853, 1998

MI

-14% -12%

STROKE

UKPDS: RISK REDUCTION IN DIABETES-RELATED COMPLICATIONS FOR 1%

DECLINE IN HbA1C

Micro-vascular

-37%**-40

-30

-20

-10

0

Ris

k R

educ

tion

(%)

P=NS

If hyperglycemia does not play a major role in the

development of ASCVD in T2DM, what factors are

responsible for the accelerated atherogenesis?

INSULIN RESISTANCE SYNDROMEObesity (visceral)

Diabetes/IGTHypertensionDyslipidemia

Increased PAI-1Endothelial Dysfunction

LipotoxicityNAFLD/NASHInflammation

ASCVDHyperinsulinemia

INSULIN RESISTANCE

INSULIN SENSITIVITY IN THE IRS

CON

Glu

cose

Upt

ake

(mg/

m2 -m

in)

HTNObeseNGT

LeanT2DM

0

300

200

100

Hyper-Trigly

Bressler & DeFronzo, Diabetologia 39:1345-50, 1996

* p < 0.001 vs CON** p < 0.01 vs CON

* * * ***

CAD

*

PREDICTIVE (%) VALUE OF FRAMINGHAM CARDIOVASCULAR RISK ENGINE IN MEN

D’Agostino RB et al, JAMA 286:180-87, 2001

MEAN

69%

0

25

50

75

100

FHS ARIC ARIC FHS HHP PR SHS CHS

PER

CEN

T (%

)

Japa

nese

Am

er

His

pani

c

Nat

ive

Am

er

Whi

te (M

)

Whi

te

Whi

te (F

)

Whi

te

Bla

ckUNEXPLAINED RISK=31%

ALL CAUSE MORTALITY AND CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN T2DM (N=2,287,362) AND MATCHED CONTROLS (N=457,473) IN SWEDISH

NATIONAL DIABETES REGISTRYRawshani et al, NEJM 376:1407-18, 2017

Inci

denc

e R

ate

(per

10,

000

pers

on-y

r)

T2DM

- - - -

300 -

350 -

250 -

-

400 -

- -Death from any Cause

Controls200 -0 -

Death from Cardiovascular Disease

150 -

200 -

100 -

250 -

50 -

0 - - --- -

T2DM

ControlsInci

denc

e R

ate

(per

10,

000

pers

on-y

r)

- - - - - -

ANTIDIABETIC MEDICATIONS WITH DOCUMENTED CARDIOVASCULAR

BENEFIT

Pioglitazone

GLP-1 RAs

SGLT2 INHIBITORS

EFFECT OF THIAZOLIDINEDIONES ON INSULIN-MEDIATED GLUCOSE DISPOSAL

mg/

kg F

FM•m

in

Before PIO ROSI0

4

6

8

10* *

Miyazaki & DeFronzo, Diabetologia 44: 2210, 2001Diabetes Care 24: 710, 2001

GLYSYNTH

GOX

EFFECT OF TZD AND PLACEBO TREATMENT ON ISR IN RELATIONSHIP TO INSULIN RESISTANCE

IS

R (A

UC

)

Glu

cose

(AU

C)

1 IRx

*

**

Before RxAfter Rx

2500

0

2000

1500

1000

500

Gastaldelli, DeFronzo et al, AJP 292:E871-83, 2007

PROACTIVE

In high risk type 2 diabetics:

● To examine whether pioglitazone reduces total mortality and macrovascular morbidity

19 European Countries

5238 Type 2 Diabetics

TIME (months)

PROACTIVE (n=5238):TIME TO DEATH, MI, OR STROKE

LANCET 366:1279-89,2005

Placebo

Pioglitazone

Kap

lan-

Mei

er E

vent

Rat

e 0.15

0.10

0.05

00 12 24 36

PlcPIO

358301

14.4%12.3%

# Events 3 YearEstimate

P=0.027

HR =0.84

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

40 80 120 160

Comparator

Pioglitazone

0TIME (weeks)

CI = 0.55-1.02

HR=0.75

(n = 5,203)

(n = 5,944)

CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES FROM PIOGLITAZONE META-ANALYSIS OF

CLINICAL TRIALS FDA and Center for Drug Evaluation &Research; July 30,2007

PIOGLITAZONE REDUCES CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS

HR = 0.7695% CI = 0.62 – 0.93

P = 0.007

EFFECT OF PIOGLITAZONE VERSUS PLACEBO ON RECURRENT STROKE / MI IN IRIS STUDY

0.95 -

0.90 - -

100 -

1 2 3

0.85 -

Years since Randomization

Placebo

0 - 4

Pioglitazone

0.80 -Cum

ulat

ive

Prob

abili

ty

of E

vent

s-fr

ee S

urvi

val

5Number at risk

0

1939 1793 1701 1491 1196481

1937 1778 1690 1476 1182459

Placebo

Pioglitazone

Kernan et al, NEJM, February 17, 20016

N = 3,876

ANTIDIABETIC MEDICATIONS WITH DOCUMENTED CARDIOVASCULAR

BENEFIT

Pioglitazone

GLP-1 RAs

SGLT2 INHIBITORS

Glucagon-like Peptide 1 (GLP-1)and

Glucose-Dependent Insulinotrophic Polypeptide (GIP)

account for ~90% of the incretin effect and 60-70% of insulin

secreted during a meal

INCRETINSIn response to equivalent hyperglycemic stimuli, ORAL glucose elicits a greater

insulin response than IV glucose

GLP-1 ANALOGUES● Exenatide BID● Liraglutide● Exenatide QW● Albiglutide QW● Dulaglutide QW● Lixisenatide● Semaglutide QW● Intarcia 650● Semaglutide - oral

Rad 03/20/00

GLP-1 RECEPTOR AGONISTSGLP-1 RECEPTOR AGONISTS● Effectively reduce HbA1c

● Preserve beta cell function● Promote weight loss● Correct known pathophysiologic

defects in T2DM● Do not cause hypoglycemia● Have an excellent safety profile● Reduce cardiovascular events

Triplitt & DeFronzo, Expert Rev Endo Metab 1:329-41, 2006

Open-Label Extension

Baseline HbA1C=8.3%

TIME COURSE OF EFFECT OF EXENATIDEON HbA1c

Time (weeks)

H

bA1c

(%)

0 20 40 60 80 156

-2.0

-1.0

0

0.5

Placebo-ControlledTrials

Exenatide-10 g bid

Placebo

Klonoff et al, Curr Med Res Opin 24:275-285, 2008

Exenatide-10 g bid

DeFronzo et al, Diabetes Care28:1092-1100, 2005

MOLECULAR ACTIONS OF GLP-1 ON BETA CELL

● increased GLUT2 and Glucokinase● restores glucose responsitivity to resistant beta cells

● replenishes beta cell insulin stores● prevents beta cell exhaustion

INSULIN SECRETION – Glucose Dependent

INSULIN GENE TRANSCRIPTION – Pdx-1

BETA CELL GLUCOSE SENSITIVITY

cAMPPKA

Epac2

IC Ca++

PI-3KInsulin

Secretion

● PI-3K/Akt inhibition of caspase activation

BETA CELL APOPTOSIS

Increa sedHG P

Hype rglyc emia

ETI OLO GY O F T2 DM

DEFN7 5-3/99 Decrea sed G lucoseU ptake

Imp aired Insul inSecre tion Inc rease d Lip olysis

HYPERGLYCEMIAHYPERGLYCEMIA

DecreasedIncretin Effect

DecreasedIncretin Effect

Decreased InsulinSecretion

IncreasedHGP

Islet–cellIslet–cell

IncreasedGlucagonSecretion

OMINOUS OCTET

IncreasedLipolysis

IncreasedGlucose

Reabsorption

NeurotransmitterDysfunction

Decreased GlucoseUptake

Diabetes 58:773-795, 2009

GLP-1

GLP-1

GLP-1GLP-1

GLP-1

GLP-1

Placebo

Liraglutide

Years

Patie

nts

with

Eve

nts

(%)

10 -

15 -

5 -

-

12

-

24

-

0

- - - -

20 -

0

36

-

54

-

N = 9,340HR = 0.8795% Cl, 0.78-0.97P=0.01

Weeks

Semaglutide

2

N = 14,752HR = 0.9195% CI =0.83-1.00P=0.06

6 -

0 -

12 -

18 -

-

- - -- -

0 1 3 4 5

Exenatide

Placebo

320 64 96 109

8 -

6 -

4 -

0

2 -

Placebo

10 - N = 3297 HR = 0.7495% Cl, 0.58-0.95P = 0.02

- - - - - - - -

EFFECT OF ONCE WEEKLY EXENATIDE ON MACE IN EXSCEL

Years

EFFECT OF SEMAGLUTIDE

ON MACE IN SUSTAIN-6

Marso et al, NEJM, Sept 16, 2016

EFFECT OF LIRAGLUTIDE ON MACE IN LEADER

Marso et al, NEJM June 13, 2016 Holman et al, NEJM, Sept 13, 2017

DPP-4 INHIBITORS

EFFECT OF SAXAGLIPTIN ON HbA1c: CHANGE FROM PLACEBO (BASELINE HbA1c ≈ 8.0%)

Int J Clin Prac 63:1395, 2009; Diab Ob Metab 10:376, 2008Diab Care 32:1649, 2009; JCEM 94:4810, 2009

-1

-0.5

0

DRUG NAIVE METFORMIN

ADDITION OF SAXAGLIPTIN TO:GLYBURIDE PIO/ROSI

H

bA1c

(%)

-0.63-0.76

-0.83

-0.64

KAPLAN-MEIER PLOT TO TIME OF OCCURRENCE OF PRIMARY (MACE) ENDPOINT WITH

SAXAGLIPTIN (N=16,492)

HR = 1.00 (95% CI, 0.89-1.12)P<0.001 for non-inferiorityP=0.99 for superiority

Scirica et al, NEJM 369:1317-26, 2013

2 – yr Kaplan-Meier rate:Saxagliptin, 7.3%Placebo, 7.2%

12 -

8 -

4 -

09007205403501800

- - - - -

Days

Placebo

SAXA increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure and hypoglycemia

Saxagliptin

Patie

nts

with

End

Poi

nt (%

)

ANTIDIABETIC MEDICATIONS WITH DOCUMENTED CARDIOVASCULAR

BENEFIT

Pioglitazone

GLP-1 RAs

SGLT2 INHIBITORS

SGLT2 INHIBITION:A NOVEL TREATMENT

STRATEGY FOR TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

Dapagliflozin Canagliflozin Empagliflozin

SGLT 2 INHIBITION: MEETING UNMETNEEDS IN DIABETES CARE

Corrects a Novel Pathophysiologic

Defect

ReducesHbA1c

Promotes Weight Loss

ComplementsAction of Other

AntidiabeticAgents

Reduces Blood

Pressure NoHypoglycemia

Improves GlycemicControl

and CVRFs

Reversal ofGlucotoxicity

Hazard ratio=0.86 (95% CI, 0.74- 0.99)p=0.004

Placebo

Empagliflozin

Months

10 -

15 -

5 -

-

12

-

24

-

0 48

- - - -

20

036

-

N = 7,020

4 -

6 -

0

8 -

-

-

2 -

-

- - - - - - - -0 12 24 36 48

Months

Hazard ratio = 0.62(95% Cl, 0.49-0.77)P<0.00l

Placebo

Empagliflozin

-

-

Hazard ratio = 0.65 (95% Cl, 0.50- 0.85)P=0.002

Placebo

Empagliflozin

Months

4 -

3 -

5 -

2 -

1 -

-

12

-

24

-

0 48

- - - -

6 -

7

036

-

EFFECT OF EMPAGLIFLOZIN ON

HOSPITALIZATION FOR HEART FAILURE

Zinman et al, NEJM, Sept 20, 2015

EFFECT OF EMPAGLIFLOZIN ON CV

DEATH IN EMPA-REG

EFFECT OF Empagliflozin ON MACE

IN EMPA-REG

Zinman et al, NEJM, Sept 20, 2015

Patie

nts

with

Eve

nts

(%)

KEY OUTCOMES IN CANVAS AND EMPA REG OUTCOME

CV death, nonfataI MI, nonfatal stroke

CV death

Nonfatal myocardial infarction

Hospitalization for heart failure

CV death or hospitalization for heart failure

All-cause mortality

Progression to macroalbuminuria*

Renal composite

Nonfatal stroke

Hazard ratio (95% CI)

*CANVAS Program endpoints comparable withEMPA-REG OUTCOME.

CANVAS Program EMPA-REG OUTCOME

0.25 0.5 1.0 2.0Favors SGLT2i Favors placebo

Zinman B et al. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373:2117-2128Wanner K et al. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375:323-334

CONTRIBUTION OF SGLT-2 INHIBITORS TOALL-CAUSE DEATH AND HHF IN CVD-REAL

(N=309,046)

CANA42.3%

CANA75.4%

CANA1.5

DAPA51.0%

DAPA19.3%

DAPA90.1%

EMPA 6.7% EMPA 5.3% EMPA 8.3%

0

20

40

60

80

100

All countriescombined

US only Europeancountriescombined

Prop

ortio

n of

Expo

sure

Tim

e (%

)Kosiborad et al, Circulation 136:249-259, 2017

ALL-CAUSE DEATH IN CVD-REAL

US

Norway

Denmark

Sweden

UK

# of Events

250

364

323

317

80

Number

143,264

25,050

18,468

18,378

10,462

HR

0.38

0.55

0.46

0.47

0.73

Total 215,622 1334 0.49 (P<0.001)

Favor SGLT2i Favor OGLD

Hazard Ratio: 0.05 0.25 0.5 1.0 2.0

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐‐

HOSPITALIZATION FOR HEART FAILURE IN CVD REAL

US

Norway

Denmark

Sweden

UK

Germany

# of Events

298

278

167

191

16

11

Number

233,798

25,050 191

18,468

18,378

10,462

2900

HR

0.55

0.62

0.77

0.61

0.36

0.14Total 309,056 961 0.61 (P<0.001)

Favor SGLT2i Favor OGLD

Hazard Ratio: 0.05 0.25 0.5 1.0 2.0

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

‐‐

KAPLAN–MEIER CURVES FOR MACE AND HHF IN CV-REAL NORDIC

Persson F et al, Diab Ob Metab, 2017HR=0.79P=0.006

1.0 2.01.50.5

Dapagliflozin (n=10,227)

DPP4i (n=30,681)

4 -

0 -

2 -

0Years

Cum

Inci

denc

e (%

)

- ----

HEART FAILURE HOSPITALIZATIONHR=0.62P<0.001

-

1.0

-

2.01.5

-

0.5

- Dapagliflozin

DPP4i

-

0

4 -

0 -

2 -

Cum

Inci

denc

e (%

)

Years

MACE

DECLARE-TIMI58 TRIAL: CURRENTLY THE LARGEST OUTCOME TRIAL ONGOING INVOLVING SGLT-2 INHIBITORS

Study is well powered to answer the question as to whether DAPAGLIFLOZIN COULD OFFER CV BENEFITS,

as well as addressing other safety related questions.1

Primary Outcome Measures: [ Time Frame: up to 6 years ].• Time to first event included in the composite endpoint of

CV death, MI or ischemic stroke

THE MUCH LARGER

DECLARE-TIMI58:

EXPECTED TO REPORT IN 2018.

Plans to include 17,150 individuals with T2DM and has indicated a target

of 1390 3-point MACE

Secondary Outcome Measures: [ Time Frame: up to 6 years ]. • Time to first event of Hospitalization for Congestive Heart Failure• Time to first event included in the composite endpoint of CV

death, MI, ischemic stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, hospitalization for unstable angina pectoris, or hospitalization for any revascularization

• Time to All cause mortality• Body weight change from baseline

SGLT2 Inhibitors and Potential CV Impact

Weight loss and reduced visceral fat

Uric acid

Na+H+

Inflammation & Oxidative stress

SNS activity

Arterial stiffnessGlucoseGlucose

Blood pressure &

Heart rate Plasma Volume

Ang 1-7AT2 receptor

Insulin Resistance

Insulin Resistance

Ketones

GLP-1 RAs SGLT2i

Glycemic control (A1c)

GLP-1 RA/SGLT2i

Insulin sensitivity

Beta cell function

Atherogenesis

Hemodynamic benefit

MACE

COMBINATION THERAPY WITH SGLT2 INHIBITOR AND GLP-1 RECEPTOR AGONIST

DeFronzo RA, Diab Obes Metab 19:1353-1362, 2017

Weight

CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTION TRIALS

● GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

● Pioglitazone

● SGLT-2 Inhibitor

LEADER, SUSTAIN-6EXSCEL (P=0.06)

PROactive, IRIS, FDAPeriscope, Chicago

EMPA-REG OUTCOMECANVASCV REAL

● Metformin

UKPDS (n=342)

THE FAB FOUR

GLP-1 RAs

PIOGLITAZONESGLT2i METFORMIN