mapping key dimensions of industrial relations - 2016
TRANSCRIPT
Mapping Key Dimensions of Industrial Relations
Dr. Christian Welz
University of Arkansas, Dublin, 08 June 2016
2
Varieties of IR
Research questions
Key dimensions
Views of stakeholders
IR cluster perspective
Indicators
2
3
4
Outline of the presentation
6
5
1
3
Varieties of IR1
2
3
4
Outline of the presentation
65
Definition of industrial relations
industrial relations (IR) – “the focal point of the field (…) is the employee-employer
relationship.” (US Social Science Research Council 1928)
– “(…) the consecrated euphemism for the permanent conflict, now acute, now subdued, between capital and labour.”(Miliband,1969, 80, cited by Blyton/Turnbull, 2004, 9)
– “The central concern of IR is the collective regulation (governance) of work and employment.” (Sisson 2010)
Industrial relations regimes
• Liberal market vs. coordinated market economies
– Peter Hall and David A. Soskice, 2001,
Varieties of Capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage,
Oxford University Press.
Liberal Msarket Economies
• UK– corporate governance: shareholder dominated; performance
represented by current earnings and share prices – employee relations: short term, market relations between employee
and employer; top management has unilateral control of the firm– industrial relations: employer organisations and unions relatively
weak; decentralised wage setting; insecure employment (“hire and fire”; fluid labour markets)
– vocational training / education: vocational education offered on market; labour force has high general skills
– inter-firm relations: market relations, competition; use of formal contracting and subcontracting relationships.
Coordinated Market Economies
• GERMANY– corporate governance: long-term bank-dominated insider systems;
cross-directorships; cross-shareholding; – employee relations: long term, formalised participation of
employees; consensus decision-making with management– industrial relations: trade unions and employers organised;
industry-wide collective bargaining and pay determination; employment relatively secure
– vocational training: elaborate industry-based training schemes; labour force has high industry-specific and firm-specific skills
– inter-firm relations: development of collaborative networks; cooperation among firms in diffusing technologies
Industrial relations regimes
• 5 geographical clusters
– Jelle Visser, 2008, in: EC, Industrial Relations in Europe Report, Brussels, DG EMP.
9
Centre-East
South
Centre-West
North
West
5 IR clusters
10
5 IR clustersNorth Centre–West South West Centre–East
IR regime Nordic corporatism social partnership polarised
pluralismliberal
pluralismtransition economies
role of SPs in public policy institutionalised irregular/
politicised rare/event-driven irregular/politicised
role of State limited ‘shadow’ of hierarchy frequent intervention non-intervention organiser of
transition
power balance labour-oriented balanced alternating employer-oriented state
bargaining style integrative distributive/conflict-oriented acquiescent
employee representation
union based/high coverage
dual channel/high coverage variable/ mixed union based/
small coverage
predominant level of CB
sector sector/company company
Trade Unions
Intersectoral level
Government
Employers
Intersectoral level
Sectoral level Sectoral level
Company level
Levels of CB
Company level
BelgiumFinland
AustriaDenmark1France1GermanyGreeceIreland1ItalyLuxembourg1NetherlandsPortugal1Spain1Sweden1
Denmark2France2Ireland2Luxembourg2 Portugal2Spain2Sweden2UK
Trade Unions
Intersectoral level
Government
Employers
Intersectoral level
Sectoral level Sectoral level
Company level
Levels of CB
Company level
Slovenia 1
Bulagaria1Cyprus 1Slovakia 1Slovenia 2
Bulgaria2CroatiaCyprus 2Czech Rep.EstoniaHungaryLatviaLithuaniaMaltaPolandRomaniaSlovakia 2
Trade Union density rate(ESDE 2015)
Employer density rate(ESDE 2015)
Collective bargaining coverage and dominant level of CB (ESDE 2015)
Days not worked due to industrial action – 2009-2013 (ESDE 2015)
Monthly minimum wage _ 2011 v 2016 EIRO 2013/14
BGRO LV EE LT HU CZ PL SK HR PT EL ES SI MTEU CY DE IE FR BE NL UK LU0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500EUR 2011 2016
Average hourly labour costs (2012) EIRO 2014
BG LV PL SK CZ GR CY UK IT DE FI SE LU DK0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45EUR
Real labour productivty (2012) EIRO 2014
EE SI LV LT PL CZ MT CY EU IT BE AT FI DE SE FR NL IE0
10
20
30
40
50
60EUR per h worked
20
Research questions
1
2
3
4
Outline of the presentation
65
21
Research questions
1. Which elements can be identified as the key dimensions and sub-dimensions of a comparative framework for industrial relations?
2. Which indicators and which data sources can be used for measuring these dimensions?
22
Key dimensions
2
3
4
Outline of the presentation
6
5
1
23
Key dimensions
INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACY
JOB & EMPLOYMENT
QUALITY
INDUSTRIAL COMPETITVENESSSOCIAL JUSTICE
Industrial democracy
participation
influence
autonomy
representation
26
Views of stakeholders
1
2
3
4
Outline of the presentation
65
27
Employers
28
Trade Unions
29
Governments
30
IR cluster perspective
1
2
3
4
Outline of the presentation
65
31
5 IR clusters
Centre-East
South
Centre-West
North
West
32
33
Indicators
1
2
3
4
Outline of the presentation
65
Industrial democracy
participation
influence
autonomy
representation
35
indicators: selection criteria- Relevance: Can the indicator be brought into strong association with one or
several issues of one of the four key dimensions? Will the indicator be able to detect and display a variation that is important enough to warrant further investigation? Due to its importance, this criterion was double-weighted.
- Validity & embeddedness: Does the indicator indeed measure what it claims to
measure? Is it not confounded by other factors? I.e. does the measure adequately represent all facets of a concept? How well is it embedded in the overall concept?
- Availability and accessibility of data: Is time-series data available? In which
intervals? Is data accessible in the first place? The higher the interval, the more useful the data!
- Comparability: Is aggregated comparable across all EU member states plus
Norway? I.e. are all countries in the EU covered by the indicator?
36
draft indicators: industrial democracysub-dimension indicator source score
government intervention in wage bargaining
ICTWSS
min wage setting mechanisms ICTWSStime resources for employee reps ECS 2013
wage driftEurWORK/Eurostat (own calculation)
working time driftEurWORK/Eurostat (own calculation)
collectively agreed pay changes EurWORKcollectively agreed working hours EurWORK# working days lost through industrial action
ILO (>2006), ECS 2013, ETUI
level of employee involvement in decision-making ECS 2013indirect employee participation ECS 2013direct employee participation ECS 2013predominant level of wage bargaining ICTWSSemployee representation at the workplace (any form) ECS 2013trade union density OECDemployer organisation density ECS 2013collective bargaining coverage SES or ECS
representation
influence
participation
autonomy
37
indicators: industrial democracy
any proposals for other indicators ???-------