mapping magnetic field structure in star-forming regions 賴詩萍 oct 4, 2006, nthu phys colloquium
Post on 19-Dec-2015
219 views
TRANSCRIPT
Mapping Magnetic Field Structure in Star-forming Regions
賴詩萍
Oct 4, 2006, NTHU Phys Colloquium
康德 - 拉普拉斯 星雲假說
康德 (1755 年 ) - 原始星雲是由大小不等的固體微粒組成的 “﹐ 天體在吸引最強的地方開始形成”﹐萬有引力使得微粒相互接近。
拉普拉斯 (1796 年 ) - 形成太陽系的雲是一團巨大的﹑灼熱的﹑轉動著的氣體﹐大致呈球狀。由於冷卻﹐星雲逐漸收縮 , 星雲的中心部分凝聚成太陽 。
Star formation standard model
Shu et al. 1987
Shu et al. (1987)
Star formation standard model
P. Andre
Starless Cores – Barnard 68
Simplest Star Formation TheorySimplest Star Formation Theory
Thermal pressure supportThermal pressure support - Jeans Mass (1928)
GravitationThermal Pressure
Why B is important in star formation?
Regulating star formation efficiency Observed star formation efficiency is low
Theoritical 200 M/year >> Observed 3 M/year B provides support in
Static fields MHD waves (turbulence)
Facilitating gravitational collapse Angular momentum problem – magnetic braking Magnetic flux problem - ambipolar diffusion
Magnetic support theoriesMagnetic support theories
MHD simulationsMHD simulations (Ostriker, Gammie, & Stone 1999)
Morphology EvolutionMorphology Evolution
2
2
A
s
V
c large -> random
morphology
How to measure B?How to measure B?
Zeeman Effect – Too Difficult!!Polarization of Dust Emission: PBp
Polarized Molecular Line Emission (the Goldreich-Kylafis Effect): PBp or PBp
BV
Polarization Observations with Polarization Observations with Berkeley-Illinois-Maryland Array Berkeley-Illinois-Maryland Array
(BIMA)(BIMA)
Dust Polarization observations with BIMA
Magnetic Field MorphologyMagnetic Field Morphology – W51 e1/e2JCMT JCMT 14” at 850 14” at 850 mm BIMA BIMA 2” at 1.3 mm 2” at 1.3 mm
Lai et al. (2001)Chrysostomou et al. (2002)
NGC 2024NGC 2024
Matthews et al. (2002)
JCMT JCMT 14” at 850 14” at 850 mm BIMA BIMA 2” at 1.3 mm 2” at 1.3 mm
Lai et al. (2002)
DR21(OH) – JCMT vs. BIMA
(B map)
Lai et al. (2003)
NGC1333 IRAS4A
NGC1333 IRAS4A
Twisted hour-Twisted hour-glass glass geometrygeometry
NGC1333 IRAS4A
BIMA BIMA 2” at 1.3 mm 2” at 1.3 mm SMA SMA 1” at 850 1” at 850 mm
Lai (2002) Girart, Rao, Marrone (2006)
Physical quantitiesPhysical quantities
Dispersion of Polarization Angle (Dispersion of Polarization Angle ())1. Field Strengths (the Chandrasekhar-Fermi Method)
2. Mass-to-magnetic-flux Ratios
3. Turbulent-to-magnetic-energy Ratios
Dispersion of Polarization Angle (Dispersion of Polarization Angle ())
⇒ Field Strengths in the plane of sky
• Uniform fields perturbed by MHD turbulence -
• Incompressible fluid - invariant
• Small perturbation -
• Isotropic turbulence -
Chandrasekhar-Fermi MethodChandrasekhar-Fermi Method
B
B
4
B
losp
Ostriker, Stone, & Gammie 2001
Results Bp ~ 0.8 – 3.5 mG
M/ΦΦB,p ~ 0.1 – 4.9 critical mass-to-flux ratio
turb ~ 0.03 – 0.4
⇒ BBpp, M/, M/ΦΦB,pB,p, , turbturb
Future Work – More observations!!Future Work – More observations!!
Current/Future instrumentsCurrent/Future instrumentsSMA (the only working interferometer for now)CARMA = BIMA + OVRO (?)ALMA!! (wait at least 7 years)
3D Magnetic Field Structure3D Magnetic Field StructureZeeman measurements
High density (106 cm-3) - CNYoung Cores – CCS
Line polarization
ALMA in 7 years
廣告時間
“Star and Planet formation” Journal Club時間 : 隔週週二中午 12:10-1:00 pm地點 : 502A目的
輪流報告最新的研究結果培養學生對這個研究主題的興趣
參與老師 : 江瑛貴 , 陳惠茹 , 呂聖元 , 賴詩萍