maqasid shariah and fiat money

8/9/2019 Maqasid Shariah and Fiat Money

1/17

Unattainablenesof the maqasi

1

HumanomVol. 22 No. 1, 2

pp. 1# Emerald Group Publishing Lim

0828-8DOI 10.1108/08288660610647

Part I: Seigniorage of fiat moneyand the maqasid al-Shari’ah: the

unattainableness of the maqasidAhamed Kameel Mydin Meera and Moussa Larbani

Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Management Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan

Gombak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Abstract

Purpose – To reason whether the interest-based fiat monetary system is compatible with theobjectives of the Islamic law or the Shariah.Design/methodology/approach – This is a theoretical paper that uses the quantity theory of money and the objectives or maqasid al-Shariah as expounded by scholars as basis for logical

deductions therefrom.Findings – The socio-economic implications of fiat monetary system imply that the maqasidal-Shariah cannot be attained. Indeed, the system is likely to cause a move away from the maqasid.Research limitations/implications – The paper is based primarily on theoretical deductions.Further empirical investigation would shed further light.Practical implications – Practical implications are numerous. The definition of what is money isthen crucial to address the socio-economic implications caused by the fiat monetary system. ForIslamic economics, this would imply that the process of Islamization of knowledge/disciplines is futilewithout addressing this issue first. Accordingly, the establishment of Islamic economics, banking andfinance warrants a serious look into the current definition of money and monetary systems.Originality/value – It calls for a definition of Shariah-compatible money. This is beneficial to theresearchers, proponents and practitioners of Islamic economics, banking and finance.

Keywords Islam, Finance, Socio-economic regions, Interest

Paper type Conceptual paper

Introduction and objectives of paperThe 1970s saw the beginning of Islamic resurgence with works on Islamic economics,banking and finance mushrooming. Yet till today, these merely exist only in writingsand academic works. In the real world, a truly working model of an Islamic economicsystem is yet to be seen. Islamic banking first seemed the best practical aspect of Islamic economics, but nonetheless, evidences show, but even that is now convergingback to its conventional counterpart Meera and Larbani (2004). Contrary to its glorioustimes, the present Muslim world is characterized by economic backwardness, withincreasing disparity in income distribution, poverty, etc.

The history of money in Islam started with the use of the Roman Byzantine gold

coins, i.e. denarius or known as the dinar among the Arabs and the Persian silver coins,i.e. drachma or known as the dirham. The Arabs did not mint their own coin during thetimes the Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) preached the message of Islam. The Prophet (peace be upon him) brought about sweeping socialtransformations and changes that included business matters, but nonetheless, theProphet (peace be upon him) accepted the Roman denarius and the Persian drachma asthe monetary units for Muslims, i.e. as the Shari’ah money[1]. Prominent Muslimscholars of the past, like al-Ghazzali, Ibn Taymiyyah, Qudama Ibn Jaafar, Ibn Khaldunand al-Maqrizi have asserted that Allah SWT had created the two metals, gold andsilver, as a medium of exchange and a measure for all things Sanusi (2002). Gold played

The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at

www.emeraldinsight.com/0828-8666.htm


2/17


3/17


1

With this in background, the following section discusses the maqasid al-Shari’ahand the socio-economic effects of fiat money, and thereafter reasons why it isimpossible to attain the maqasid al- Shari’ah in a fiat monetary environment.

The Maqasid al-Shari’ahAl-Ghazzali states that the very objective of Shari’ah is to promote the welfare of thepeople, which encompasses the safeguarding of faith, life, intellect, posterity andwealth. Anything that protects or promotes these is considered as serving themaslahah and hence desirable Chapra (1992, p. 1). Similarly, Ibn al-Qayyim al-

Jawziyyah states that the basis of the Shari’ah is wisdom and welfare of the people inthis world and the hereafter; and welfare is said to lie in justice, mercy, well-being andwisdom Chapra (1992, p. 1). Abu Ishaq al-Shatibi too contends that the Shari’ah aims atthe welfare of the people in this life and in the life hereafter by protecting its objectivesor maqasid, which can be classified as follows Khan and Ghifari (1992): (1) Daruriyyah(necessities), (2) Hajiyyah (requirements) and (3) Tahsiniyyah (beautification).

Daruriyyah are objectives which are must and basic for the establishment of

people’s welfare in this world and the hereafter; the ignoring of which can cause fasad (conflict) to prevail. Daruriyyah basically relates to the protection of the following fivecrucial matters as stated by al-Ghazzali: (1) faith ( Deen ), (2) life ( Nafs ), (3) posterity( Nasl ), (4) property ( Mal ) and (5) reason ( Aql ). These are necessary or daruriyyah forthe establishment of welfare in this world, as well as in the hereafter. In other words,these are daruriyyah for the establishment of Islam itself on earth. The renownedMuslim economist, M. Umer Chapra states Chapra (1992, p. 7):

The maqasid al-Shari’ah is everything that is needed to realize falah (well-being) and hayat tayyibah (fulfilling life), and faith is the most important ingredient for human well-being. Itputs human relations on a proper foundation, enabling human beings to interact with eachother in a balanced and mutually caring manner to help ensure the well-being of all. It alsoprovides a moral filter for allocation and distribution of resources in accordance with thedictates of brotherhood and socio-economic justice, and a motivating system that bringsbiting power to the goals of need-fulfillment and equitable distribution of income and wealth.Without injecting the dimension of faith into all human decisions, . . . it may not be possible torealize efficiency and equity in the allocation and distribution of resources, to minimizemacroeconomic imbalances and economic instability, or to overcome crime, strife, tensionsand the different symptoms of anomie.

Hajiyyah are Shari’ah provisions that remove hardship and thereby facilitate life whiletahsiniyyah are provisions that bring comfort and beauty to life. Unlike these two,daruriyyah is essential; and Shatibi puts it that daruriyyah is fundamental to hajiyyahand tahsiniyyah. Deficiency in daruriyyah brings deficiency to hajiyyah andtahsiniyyah, but not vice versa Khan and Ghifari (1992).

The following section discusses the socio-economic effects of the seigniorage of fiatmoney, and how it negates the attainment of the daruriyyah category of the maqasidal-Shari’ah.

Seigniorage of fiat money and the continuous growth ofmoney supply and debtSeigniorage[8] is the gain to the one who issues fiat money. It is the benefit onederives from the first use of fiat money. In today’s interest-based fiat money system,the bankers create money through multiple credit creation and lend this out atinterest. Money created through this fractional reserve banking system and the


4/17

H22,1

20

interest charges thereupon are basically also seigniorage. Most governments get thebenefit of seigniorage from the issuance of their respective national currencies (papernotes and coins) but the seigniorage of credit money and interest charges go to thebank.

In this regard, three main features of the current monetary system that have beenmuch criticized by Muslim scholars and pertinent to our discussion are:

(1) fiat money includes paper money and bank money (demand deposits includingelectronic money);

(2) interest and

(3) fractional reserve banking.

These three features are fundamental to the process of money creation by the bankingsector[9]. The banking sector gives birth to most money, by means of the fractionalreserve system, i.e. through multiple credit creation. The bank creates money for thefirst time when it extends loans. Hence money in most part takes the form of

accounting entries or computer electronic records. This simple accounting entry thatcarries with it purchasing power created out of nothing is the seigniorage of fiat money.An important fact to note is that all this new money is introduced into the economy,predominantly as loans[10]. It is important to note here that the Islamic banks,operating within the fractional reserve banking system, also do create money in thisform, but focuses on the use of this newly created money according to Shari’ahprinciples.

In addition to fiat money created through the fractional reserve system, interestrates given and charged by banks also increase money supply, all through mereaccounting Meera (2002). In time, therefore, the banking system would be forced tocontinually increase fiat money so that the reserve requirement can be met and,thereby, sustain the system[11]. The implication of this is that the existence of interest

rates would themselves, ceteris paribus, force a continuous increase in money supply,both state money (currency notes) and bank money (loans).

On top of that, the credit card system also increases the money supply. This isbecause in every credit card transaction one account gets debited while anothercredited. The credit entry is, nevertheless, interpreted as a deposit, and thus, thatmakes possible further money creation through the fractional reserve system.Furthermore, if a cardholder fails to settle his or her credit card balance, then aninterest charge on the balance and a late payment fee are likely to be imposed![12].

Since most money is created through multiple credit creation, money and debt are,therefore, balance sheet counterparts. This debt would show up in the aggregateeconomy in the form of private sector and public sector debt. In most countries,

bank money (loans) is the dominant money supply that comprises simply accountingentries. A much smaller portion is paper money and coins issued by the government.Table I provides the monetary aggregate statistics for sixty-two countries. On average,state money (hard currency and coins) is only about 34 per cent of the broad money,M2. Sixty-six per cent money is predominantly being created by banks as loans.The average annual growth rate of M1 (narrow money) and M2 (broad money) is astaggering 36.92 per cent and 41.40 per cent, respectively. Credit money, nevertheless,has a number of serious economic implications. An important implication is thatloans are non-repayable in aggregate and that makes loan defaults as a systemdefault in the current monetary structure. A mathematical derivation of why loans are


5/17


2

TableCountry moneta

aggregate proportioand growth rates for t

period 1986-19

Country

State money (M0) asa proportion of broadmoney (M2) in 1996

Average annual growth rate 1986-1996RealGDP

Narrowmoney (M1)

Broadmoney (M2)

Argentina 0.23 2.49 179.09 181.80Bahrain 0.14 6.15 4.72 5.65Bangladesh 0.23 4.23 10.98 13.92Belize 0.20 8.34 8.73 11.39Bolivia 0.24 3.86 23.54 35.58Botswana 0.14 7.82 14.60 18.06Brazil 0.23 2.57 591.80 677.76Burkina Faso 0.52 2.66 10.35 10.12Burundi 0.43 0.47 8.53 11.81Cameroon 0.31 2.36 3.57 3.53Chile 0.88 7.89 25.06 24.68China, P.R.: Mainland 0.35 9.99 23.03 28.19Costa Rica 0.47 3.98 15.37 24.22Ecuador 0.21 2.62 40.81 53.45

Egypt 0.30 4.20 10.79 17.13El Salvador 0.36 4.11 13.90 19.31Ethiopia 0.42 3.90 10.98 13.59Fiji 0.17 2.78 10.24 9.98Ghana 0.50 4.64 36.25 38.56Guatemala 0.27 3.88 18.55 20.11Honduras 0.32 3.63 21.24 22.07India 0.31 5.94 16.20 16.74Indonesia 0.13 10.76 16.08 25.97Iran, I.R. 0.44 3.65 23.61 25.48 Jamaica 0.35 2.66 31.68 30.50 Jordan 0.46 2.36 5.50 8.61Kenya 0.33 3.30 16.25 21.70Kuwait 0.06 2.95 1.94 3.67

Lesotho 0.25 28.04 15.13 14.17Madagascar 0.57 1.22 22.30 23.55Malawi 0.56 2.94 28.65 28.04Malaysia 0.30 8.50 17.71 15.74Maldives 0.63 8.45 18.82 20.26Malta 0.26 5.83 4.24 10.50Mauritius 0.20 5.84 14.99 18.67Mexico 0.15 2.50 42.94 41.90Mozambique 0.37 4.29 42.99 49.40Myanmar 0.66 2.52 26.24 26.56Nepal 0.36 4.52 17.73 19.75Niger 0.51 1.60 0.89 0.32Nigeria 0.52 4.23 33.87 31.64Oman 0.20 4.43 4.87 6.46Pakistan 0.33 5.26 13.78 15.92Paraguay 0.38 3.69 26.88 32.71Peru 0.40 1.15 240.04 271.95Philippines 0.22 3.68 18.37 21.93Poland 0.25 1.10 68.76 74.15Rwanda 0.49 2.39 10.19 9.96Saudi Arabia 0.21 2.92 4.43 4.90Sierra Leone 0.51 2.90 39.91 43.75

(continued)


6/17

H22,1

22

non-repayable in aggregate, i.e. why default on loan is a sure thing to take place followsin the following section.

Mathematical model: why loans are non-repayable in aggregate (i.e. whydefaults are sure to take place)Let us introduce the following notations:

X = the initial amount of money lent to the players.

I = {1, 2, . . . , n} is the set of players.

i = the initial debt of player i , i =1, 2, . . . , n.W i = the real asset of player i or his wealth or the maximum level of debt that hecan bear.

= the rate of interest, 2 ]0, 1[.

i = the amount by which the debt increases at the end of the period (for

example 1 year).

I 1 = the set of players who reimburse at the end of period.

I 2 = the set of players who didn’t reimburse at the end of period.

D = total debt of all players (or aggregate debt) generated by interest.

G = the global (or aggregate) debt of all players.

R = the global amount of money reimbursed at the end of period by all players.

Now let us give some relations between the defined above quantities.

Table I.

South Africa 0.09 1.56 20.33 15.15

Country

State money (M0) asa proportion of broadmoney (M2) in 1996

Average annual growth rate 1986-1996RealGDP

Narrowmoney (M1)

Broadmoney (M2)

Sri Lanka 0.34 4.31 14.02 16.99Syrian Arab Republic 0.56 5.62 14.84 16.74Thailand 0.12 9.43 15.26 18.69Trinidad and Tobago 0.22 0.27 5.84 6.82Tunisia 0.26 4.34 6.88 10.30Turkey 0.18 4.38 67.55 80.88Uganda 0.50 7.04 54.20 57.42Uruguay 0.31 3.59 59.82 62.51Venezuela, Rep. Bol. 0.42 2.60 40.81 39.85Zambia 0.25 1.25 61.09 67.28Zimbabwe 0.28 3.13 28.54 25.54

Average 0.34 4.25 36.92 41.40

Notes: Computed using data from IMF Financial Statistics Yearbook 2000. The growth rates aregeometric means for the decade 1986-1996, avoiding the 1997 East Asian economic crisis period.Source: Meera (2004)


7/17


8/17

H22,1

24

ConclusionHaving said that money is primarily introduced in the form of loan with interestcharges attached, it is important to recognize that total debt (principal plus the interest)is, therefore, not repayable in aggregate. Accordingly, in the aggregate analysis,

default is for sure by the mere design of the system. This is fundamentally due to thefact that the interest portion that needs to be repaid together with the principal doesnot exist in the form of money. As mentioned earlier, this fact is very crucial as it has anumber of serious consequences and implications.

For example, assume that there is a total of RM10 billion money supply in the formof loan given out at an interest rate of 10 per cent. At the end of the period RM11 billion(i.e. 10 billion plus interest of 1 billion) need to be repaid. However, only RM10 billionactually exists in the form of money. The money needed for the interest portion doesnot exist. If additional money to the amount of RM1 billion is not created andintroduced into the system, then some borrowers are bound to default on the loan.Therefore, in this system three things may take place in order to sustain itdynamically[14]: (1) Additional money in the form of loans be created and given out to

the defaulting units (i.e. rescheduling loans). This, of course, would increase further theindebtedness of the borrower. (2) Additional paper money and coins can be introducedby the government to the extent of the interest money. (3) The bank confiscates realwealth (e.g. collateral and others) from the defaulting borrower. The first two wouldcause money supply in the economy to grow further. The last one transfers real wealthfrom the borrower to the banker.

The first option causes money in the economy to grow in the form of debt – privatesector debt and public sector debt, thereby causing these sectors to becomeincreasingly indebted to the banking sector and in aggregate, actually deferring ahigher default amount to a later date. The banking sector, having the power to giveadditional loans, effectively controls the life-line of the private and public sectors sinceit can decide which defaulting unit (for some units are sure to default by the design of the system) it would save (by giving additional loans) and which it would let fail.

While the present system can be sustained only dynamically by a continuousincrease in money, it is bound to collapse ultimately because debt has financialimplications on the capital structure of the economy.

While debt financing is attractive to firms because generally it is cheaper, interestpayments are tax deductible and it, therefore, increases the return on equity, theproblem with debt financing is the cashflow commitment one has to give to service thedebt – the constant periodic repayment, but the cashflow from normal businessoperations is rather risky. How much debt a firm can go for, therefore, depends on itsbusiness risk, with businesses having good cashflows being able to go for higher debtlevels. Nevertheless, it is important to observe that, on average, businesses bear risks

higher than the debt itself (that demands a riskless payback).Since money grows in the form of debt in the current monetary system, businessesand governments would, therefore, increasingly become indebted until a level isreached that it cannot be borne any longer. When firms in the economy cannot bear itany further, they would collapse[15]. The effects of such collapse are that real wealthand sovereignty would gradually shift to those who create fiat money, i.e. those whodirectly benefit from its seigniorage. The stakes in the current interest-based fiatmonetary system is summarized in Figure 1[16]. It is not difficult to see that a seriousdefect of the current monetary system is where fiat money is introduced primarily asdebt into the economy with interest charges attached, that brings about further


9/17


10/17


11/17


2

the mathematical model of Section 4 is also valid at the international level. This isbecause, for example, say a country A takes a loan denominated in dollars from aninternational financial institution. In aggregate then, the system must create additionaldollars for otherwise the loan is not repayable (note that other existing dollars have

also been loaned into existence, thus putting other debtor countries in a similarposition). Since the borrower countries have no power to create dollars[20], theborrower countries must compete for the existing dollars circulating worldwide.Competition for dollars is, therefore, tough since there are not many countriesanyway[21]. Hence such borrowing can be deadly for developing nations since theirglobal competitiveness is generally not that good. In this way, developing nations tendto become heavily indebted and thereby lose their wealth and sovereignty easily tothese international financial institutions.

While both the Islamic bank and the conventional bank create the original principal amountsof loans through fractional reserve banking system (i.e. loans given out do not really reducethe deposits of the depositors), a customer owes more money in the Islamic mode than theconventional mode at any time thereafter until the loan is settled. This fact alone is veryattractive for even conventional bankers to provide Islamic mode financing. But, nonetheless,considering the serious negative socio-economic implications of fiat money-based fractionalreserve banking, we regretfully conclude that Islamic banking under fractional reservesystem is likely to accelerate the said effects – the default rates, the transfer of wealth andsovereignty, etc.

In the present global monetary system with some currencies playing the role of international reserve currencies, developing nations including almost all Muslimnations lose tremendously due to this seigniorage. Resources of the developing nationsare being plundered through this system, i.e. through the magic of seigniorage. Aninternational currency like the dollar, therefore, enjoys immense advantage throughseigniorage. Since it has purchasing power outside the United States, additional money

can be created for use outside the country without placing undue inflationary pressuredomestically. In this era of globalization and neo-liberalization, therefore, interest-based fiat money systems no longer work to the advantage of developing nations. Theentire process occurs subtly and gradually since interest is based on time. The systembasically enslaves the masses[22]. The entire system is akin to slavery wheredevelopment would still be observed, but the ownership of assets and sovereigntygradually gets eroded and transferred away. Therefore, the seigniorage of fiat moneyhas implications for ownership of assets in the economy.

Since the collapse of the Ottoman caliphate in 1924 and the triumphant entry of fiatmoney and interest, Muslim nations must have lost huge amounts of wealth throughthe seigniorage of fiat money, particularly to the colonial masters, and the bankerswhom they had placed, before they left.

The unattainableness of the maqasid al-Shari’ah: protection of wealth(Mal ) – the first of the Maqasid to sufferTherefore, it is obvious that in the interest-based fiat money system, the protection of wealth, which is one of the maqasid al-Shari’ah suffers. Individuals and sovereigngovernments are, therefore, likely to suffer particularly in this era of globalization andneo-liberalization. As wealth accumulates in the hands of fiat money creators,sovereignty would also be lost. Sovereignty is indeed linked to the other maqasid,i.e. the protection of faith, life, intellect and progeny and these would also be affected.


12/17

H22,1

28

This is because when sovereignty is lost in a land, then the new rulers may impose

things that directly or indirectly affect the other maqasid. History has a number of

evidences for this. When sovereignty was lost in Muslim lands, the education system

was changed, i.e. affecting the intellect ( Aql ). Today foreign forces are even asking

Muslim nations to change their education curriculum, while some are even closing

down religious schools. Muslim women and children are even prohibited to wear the

hijab. Even the athan, the call to prayers using loudspeakers have been prohibited in

some cases. Of course, affecting the education and interfering in the practice of the

religion can in turn affect faith itself. Also the inability to protect wealth could also lead

to the lack of faith.

Such an important link between wealth and preservation of faith can also be

deduced from the following sayings of the Prophet (peace be upon him):

Poverty, in all probability, leads to unbelief ( kufr , Baihaqi and Tabarani).

There are also attempts to limiting the population growth of Muslims, citing the reasonthat per capita income would be better with smaller populations. In some countries,

even birth contraceptives are being distributed free in order to curb Muslim population

growth. This of course affects the maqasid, i.e. the protection of life and progeny.

From these, it is obvious that in the interest-based fiat money system, firstly

Muslims will not be able to protect their wealth. Thereafter, they are likely to lose

sovereignty and thereby lose the other maqasid of al-Shari’ah (see Figure 3).

Fiqh, Business,

Family,

Inheritance,

Crime etc.

ShariahRulings

Maqasid al-Shari’ah

Note: Shari’ah rulings that encompass fiqh, business, family, inheritance, crime etc.

are meant to achieve the maqasid al-Shari’ah that bring about welfare in this world

and the hereafter. Nonetheless, fiat money negates the attainment of one of the

daruriyyah elements of the maqasid al-Shari’ah, i.e. the protection of wealth,

thereby, causing the loss of sovereignty which, in turn, causes the loss of the other

Figure 3.Fiat money and theunattainableness of themaqasid al-Shari’ah


13/17


2

The ‘‘hidden tax’’ and other socio-economic effects of seigniorageSince the initial effect of money creation is an increase of money supply relative to thereal economy, it therefore, entails a hidden tax on the entire economy, the rich andthe poor alike (in the form of inflation). Nonetheless, the poor are likely to suffer more

since they generally have low savings. Also the newly created money is likely to go tothe rich first[23]. In Islam, wealth transfer is always from the rich to the poor in theform of zakat, charity etc. But seigniorage of fiat money taxes the poor and transferswealth from the poor to the rich. Additionally, interest charges concentrate wealth inthe hands of a small minority by taxing the majority[24]. Such concentration andcirculation of wealth among the rich is discouraged in Islam.

In order that it (wealth) may not (merely) make a circuit between the wealthy among you . . .Qur’an (Al-Hashr 59:7).

This concentration of wealth, in turn, would cause less and less money to circulate inthe economy thereby bringing about numerous socio-economic problems associated

with low circulation of money that includes unemployment. The society would thentend to compete for money whose circulation keeps decreasing.This effect, taken together with inflationary nature of fiat money, would cause a

section of the economy to experience falling real income, thereby bringing aboutincreased disparity in income distribution, creating relative and absolute poverty. Thisdisparity in income distribution is something to be concerned about for it brings aboutwith it a host of socio-economic problems. Using the equation of exchange, Meera(2002) argued that such problems include inflation, unemployment, widening incomedistribution gap, housing for the low-income group, agriculture, poverty, crime, etc.

Since the property sector is one of the sectors that absorb the increasing moneysupply, the price of homes can thus be expected to grow at a rate higher than theaverage income growth. This can pose some housing issue problems[25].

The struggle to survive in the economy, particularly by those at the lower strata,may cause them to resort to corruption, crime, etc. Therefore as the system createspoverty, it is also likely to bring about social evils including anomie (i.e. erosion of traditional values). Hence crime is likely to become part and parcel of the interest-basedfiat monetary system.

With all the negative effects of fiat money we truly assert that the creation of fiatmoney is a serious form of riba. It is, therefore, not surprising to note some of theobservations made by prominent economists. Consider the following. Chapra statesChapra (1992, p. 9):

The Islamic economic system does not prevail in any part of the Muslim world. The Muslimcountries have been trying to solve their economic problems through policies developed

within the secularist perspective of the prevailing systems. Their problems have becomeaggravated and they have moved farther and farther from the realization of the maqasid [26].Despite a rise in gross domestic product, poverty has not declined; rather it has risen.Inequalities of income and wealth have also worsened, and the basic needs of their peopleremain unsatisfied. The public sector budgetary deficits have risen, as have balance of payments deficits and external debt, and the threat of inflation persists.

While the World Bank was established more than half a century ago (in 1944), with themotto Our dream is a world without poverty, its former chief economist, Nobel Laureate,

Joseph Stiglitz wrote the following Stiglitz (2002, p. 5):


14/17


15/17


3

7. Counterfeiting is illegal particularly due to this free purchasing power from the first useof the money. Subsequent circulation of the money would not provide any more benefitto the counterfeiter.

8. Seigniorage is the value given to fiat money (that practically costs nothing to produce

and has negligible intrinsic value).9. A process that is least understood by the masses, including even many who are trained

in economics, banking and finance. For the interested reader Meera (2002) illustrates themoney creation process.

10. The formula for multiple credit creation can be written as follows:

D ¼1

r R

where D is the change in total checkable deposits, r the required reserve ratio and R thechange in reserves. Hence if the reserve requirement is 4 per cent, as in Malaysiacurrently, an initial deposit of RM1,000,000 can bring about a total deposit of RM25,000,000, i.e. an additional RM24,000,000 being created in the form of loans.

11. Historically, in most countries the public and private sector debts have continuouslygrown to sustain the system.

12. Though the bank did not pay anything tangible in the first place.

13. Nonetheless, such aggregate default is ‘‘camouflaged’’ when players repay loanspiecemeal in installment basis and as bankers spend back the money into the system.

14. This section draws from the author’s book, Meera (2004).

15. We attribute the failure of large firms like Enron and Xerox to this. In Japan lately, forexample, while the government suggested the buy back of bad debts with M0, i.e. statemoney, the bankers opposed and proposed the monetization of shares instead (i.e.effectively confiscating real wealth). When governments get into such trouble, they toocan collapse, i.e. likely to get replaced. There are many examples for this – Argentina isa recent example.

16. Reproduced from Meera (2004).

17. This statement is without prejudice towards our Shari’ah scholars who have contributedgreatly towards the development and monitoring of Shari’ah compliant financialinstruments.

18. The Islamic bank may give some rebate for the early repayment, but the amount of rebate is determined at the discretion of the bank.

19. While Meera and Larbani (2004) argued that both Islamic and conventional bankingsystems would ultimately converge due to arbitraging between both the bankingsystems, Islamic banking would continue to exist, or even further popularized by thefinance industry at least for the above reason.

20. Unlike gold, for example, where no country enjoys the monopoly over its production.

21. Thereby increasing the probability of default.22. Slave-based economies would depict faster economic growth and development because

slaves are generally overworked to produce goods and services. But the problem withslave-based economies is that the slaves are not the beneficiaries of the development, i.e.they are not the owners of what they produce. Ownership goes to their masters.Similarly, the enslavement of the masses by the riba-based economies would also bringabout faster development, but again it is a question of ownership and justice. Significantportion of the efforts and production of the people goes to the creators of fiat money.

23. The rich are more likely to get a loan from the bank since they are socially andeconomically closer to the bankers.


16/17

H22,1

32

24. See Lietaer (2001) for arguments and evidence for this.

25. The housing issues include: (a) Housing for low- and middle-income group. If the price of housing is not controlled, the money-creating system would place a burden on the low-income group. (b) Size of homes shrinks gradually. Property developers build smaller

and smaller sized homes so as to make them affordable. (c) Duration of loans extended.The banking sector ‘‘helps’’ by giving longer durations to settle housing loans.

26. Emphasis ours.

27. Asad (1980), commentary to the verse al-Rum (30:39). f.n. 35.

References

Asad, M. (1980), The Message of the Qur’an, Dar al-Andalus, Gibraltar.

Chapra, U. (1992), Islam and the Economic Challenge, The Islamic Foundation, United Kingdom.

Khan, F.M. and Ghifari, N.M. (1992), ‘‘Shatibi’s objectives of Shari’ah and some implications forconsumer theory’’, in Sadeq, A.H. and Ghazali, A. (Eds), Readings in Islamic Economic

Thought , Longman, Petaling Jayap, Malaysia, p. 176.Lietaer, B. (2001), The Future of Money. Century.

Meera, A.K.M. (2002), The Islamic Gold Dinar , Pelanduk Publications, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.

Meera, A.K.M. (2004), The Theft of Nations. Pelanduk Publications, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.

Meera, A.K.M. and Larbani, M. (2004), ‘‘The gold dinar: the next component in Islamic bankingand finance’’, Review of Islamic Economics, Vol. 15, October.

Mohammed, M.O. (1998), ‘‘al-Asfahani’s Economic Ideas: Explanation and Analysis’’, Mastersthesis (unpublished). International Islamic University Malaysia, July.

Sanusi, M.M. (2002), ‘‘Gold dinar, paper currency and monetary stability: an islamic view’’,‘‘Proceeding of the 2002 International Conference on Stable and Just Global MonetarySystem’’, Kuala Lumpur, 19-20 August, pp. 73-89.

Stiglitz, J.E. (2002), Globalization and its Discontents, Penguin Books, London.

Further reading

Bernstein, P.L. (2000), The Power of Gold , John Wiley.

Choudhury, M.A. (1997), Money in Islam: A Study in Islamic Political Economy, Routledge,London.

Duncan, R. (2003), The Dollar Crisis, John Wiley, Singapore.

Hassan, M.K. and Choudhury, M.A. (2002), ‘‘Micro-money and real economic relationship in the100 per cent reserve requirement monetary system’’, Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Stable and Just Global Monetary System, Kuala Lumpur , 19-20 August ,

2002 , pp. 47-71. Jastram, R.W. (1977), The Golden Constant , John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.

Kennedy, M. (1995), Interest and Inflation Free Money, Sava International, Michigan.

Meera, A.K.M. (2002a), ‘‘Hedging with gold dinar’’, EDGE Businessdaily, 19-26 August, p. 58.

Meera, A.K.M. (2002b), ‘‘Gold dinar in multilateral trade’’, paper presented at the InternationalSeminar on Gold Dinar in Multilateral Trade, organized by the Institute of IslamicUnderstanding Malaysia, 22-23 October, Kuala Lumpur.

Mundell, R.A. (1997), Could Gold Make a Comeback? University of Columbia,www.robertmundell.net/default.asp


17/17

maqasid shariah and fiat money

Documents