march 21, ‘06 comp. may 5, ‘06 comp summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference up to 9%...
DESCRIPTION
Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference over clouds Differences correlate with snow/ice maps Known issue in OMTO3: O 3 underestimation by up to 3% at large SZAs due to straylight at 313 nm.TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
March 21, ‘06 comp
![Page 2: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
May 5, ‘06 comp
![Page 3: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Summary
• ~4% swath angle dependent difference• Up to 9% difference over clouds• Differences correlate with snow/ice maps• Known issue in OMTO3: O3 underestimation by up to 3%
at large SZAs due to straylight at 313 nm.
![Page 4: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Comparison of OMTO3 v1, OMDOAO3 v0.9.42 and
OMDOAO3 v1 Zonal Means
Er-Woon ChiouAnd
Daniel KahnSSAI
![Page 5: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Monthly Gridded Map Criteria
1 degree x 1 degree grid using all 60 pixels• OMTO3 screening criteria
(1) Total ozone > 0(2) Error flag = 1, 1, 2
• OMDOAO3 screening criteria(1) Total ozone > 20(2) Precision ÷ (total ozone) < 90%(3) Ascending part of the orbit
![Page 6: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
January 2005 Gridded Maps
![Page 7: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
March 2005 Gridded Maps
![Page 8: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
May 2005 Gridded Maps
![Page 9: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
July 2005 Gridded Maps
![Page 10: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
September 2005 Gridded Maps
![Page 11: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
November 2005 Gridded Maps
![Page 12: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
8-Weekly Zonal Means• Uses the nadir pixel only• 5-degree zones• 8-week period
– Week 1: 3/19 – 3/25– Week 8: 5/13 – 5/17
• OMTO3 screening criteria:1. 50 < total ozone < 7002. Error flag 0, 1, 2, 8, 9, 10
• OMDOAO3 screening criteria both versions:1. 50 < total ozone < 700
![Page 13: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
� DOAS v0.942 DOAS v1.01 OMTO3
![Page 14: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
� DOAS v0.942 DOAS v1.01 OMTO3
![Page 15: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
� DOAS v0.942 DOAS v1.01 OMTO3
![Page 16: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Summary
• For 60 S through 60 N, OMDOAO3 v0.9.42 is larger than OMTO3 by about 8 ~ 9 DU
• For 50 S through 50 N, OMDOAO3 v1 is very close to OMTO3 for all 8 weeks with differences of 1 ~ 2 DU
• Differences between OMDOAO3 v1 and OMTO3 are larger during the first 4 weeks at 60 N and the last 2 weeks at 60 S
• For 30 S to 30 N, OMDOAO3 v1 is always slightly less than OMTO3
![Page 17: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Cloud-top pressure climatology assumed by OMI Total O3 Products
OMTO3 January (R>0.6)
OMDOAS January ‘05 (fc>0.75)
Cloud hts are lower
![Page 18: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Comparison of Cloud-top Pressures
Raman clouds are higher than O2-O2, but similar to THIR except in downwelling areas of the tropics.
THIR
O2-O2 Raman
![Page 19: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Comparison of IR Cloud Heights
Nimbus-7 THIR (R>0.6) Note: color scales are different
Aqua MODIS Jan ‘05 (all R)
MODIS clouds are somewhat lower, particularly over water. Similar features were seen in THIR without R cutoff.
![Page 20: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Summary
• O2-O2 derived cloud hts are generally too low compared to both IR and Raman.
• Raman values are similar to IR (after removing low reflecting clouds from the IR climatology) except in the downwelling areas of the tropics.
![Page 21: March 21, ‘06 comp. May 5, ‘06 comp Summary ~4% swath angle dependent difference Up to 9% difference…](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022020216/5a4d1bc97f8b9ab0599d644a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Possible Improvements to OMTO3
• Replace cloud climatology with OMI-”measured” cloud-top pressures.
• Fix (apparent) straylight related problem at large SZAs.• Improve O3 climatology using MLS data.• Improve Raman scattering table.• Improve profile correction scheme.
– optimal estimation using several wavelengths?• Degrade OMI resolution to 1-2 nm before doing retrieval.
– To reduce noise and Ring signal• Replace Bass & Paur (1981) with Malicet, Daumont et al. (1995)
O3 cross-section.