marianne talbot's talk at ux brighton

39
1

Upload: talbotm2

Post on 02-Jul-2015

569 views

Category:

Presentations & Public Speaking


1 download

DESCRIPTION

The slides for Marianne Talbot's talk on Action Theory at UX Brighton

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

1

Page 2: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

Thank you for inviting me to speak

2

Page 3: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

In designing a website one of your aims is

to stimulate action

This is almost certainly the main aim of

your employer

3

Page 4: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

There are all sorts of different actions you might want to

stimulate

• buying

• following

• liking

• clicking through

• recommending

• reviewing

often you’ll want to stimulate several actions

4

Page 5: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

Well action is something that philosophers

know a lot about

5

Page 6: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

Distinguish tripping over a carpet and

pretending to trip over a carpet – which is

an action and why?

6

Page 7: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

Pretending to trip over a carpet is an

action because:

• it is chosen

• it is performed intentionally

• it is performed for reasons

7

Page 8: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

When human beings act they make

choices

When human beings make choices they do

so for reasons

8

Page 9: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

If we want to understand action,

therefore, and how to stimulate it, it

is necessary to understand reason

9

Page 10: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

To be rational is to be such that some of your behaviour is reason-driven

Most rational things are such that most of their behaviour is non-rational

To be rational is to be capable of being irrational

Non-rational things are neither rational nor irrational

10

Page 11: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

What is a reason?

11

Page 12: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

A reason-driven behaviour (an

action)…

… is a behaviour caused by a

combination of desires and beliefs

12

Page 13: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

Desires and beliefs are both mental

states…

… but they differ from each other

quite radically

13

Page 14: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

Desires and beliefs play different

roles in the production of action

Desires and beliefs have a different

relation to reason

14

Page 15: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

Desires motivate action

Beliefs guide action towards its goal

15

Page 16: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

It is not possible to reason anyone

into a desire

It is only beliefs that we can be

reasoned into

16

Page 17: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

I understand that ‘UX’ stands for ‘User

Experience’…

… and that it was born because your

main aim in designing a website…

… is to provide the user with

whatever he or she wants

17

Page 18: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

Unless you are offering something the

user wants you’ll never get anywhere

But the user’s wants – desires – are only

half the picture

The user’s beliefs about how to fulfil his

desires are the other half

18

Page 19: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

In fact given that there is little you can do

about your users’ desires…

… your main aim (I respectfully

submit!)…

… should be to give your user the

belief that…

…by using your website he can fulfil

(some of) his desires 19

Page 20: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

So let’s consider the nature of beliefs

20

Page 21: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

• all beliefs have contents

• the contents of beliefs are constituted of

concepts

• every belief is related to every other belief

• beliefs admit truth and falsehood

• beliefs are expressed in sentences

• human beings care (to some extent) about

the truth of their beliefs21

Page 22: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

Relations between beliefs can be:

• rational

• irrational

• non-rational

22

Page 23: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

A rational relation between beliefs:

Belief one: Marianne always wears jeans on a Friday

Belief two: It is Friday

Belief three: Marianne is wearing jeans

The rational relation between these beliefs is entailment

If beliefs one and two are true, belief three must be true

23

Page 24: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

These beliefs amount to a deductive

argument

Premise one: Marianne always

wears jeans on a Friday

Premise two: It is Friday

Conclusion: Marianne is wearing

jeans

24

Page 25: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

All arguments are relations between beliefs such that…

…one belief is the conclusion…

… and the other beliefs are its premises …

…(the reasons given for the conclusion)

25

Page 26: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

There are two types of argument:

• deductive arguments

• inductive arguments

26

Page 27: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

Deductive arguments give us certainty

(conditionally on the truth of the

premises)

Valid deductive arguments are conclusive

Valid deductive arguments can be

evaluated a priori

27

Page 28: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

P1: All doodahs are whotsits

P2: All whotsits are green

C: This doodah is……

28

Page 29: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

Irrational relations between beliefs:

Premise one: Marianne always

wears jeans on a

Friday

Premise two: Marianne is wearing

jeans

Conclusion: It is Friday

29

Page 30: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

Non-rational relations between

beliefs:

Premise one: I want my spouse

to be faithful

Conclusion: My spouse IS

faithful

30

Page 31: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

Inductive reasoning takes us from observations of the past to predictions about the future:

P1: I have seen the sun rise every day in the

history of the universe

C: I expect the sun to rise tomorrow

Inductive reasoning is hugely important to human beings

Inductive argument is central to science

31

Page 32: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

Huge philosophical controversy: is

induction rational?

32

Page 33: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

The Scottish Philosopher David

Hume noted that…

… every inductive argument

contains a hidden premise…

… that nature is uniform (the

future will be like the past)

33

Page 34: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

This premise cannot be justified

• deductively (it generates no

contradiction to believe that nature is

not uniform)

• inductively (we’d be arguing in a

circle)

34

Page 35: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

Hume argued that induction is non-

rational

35

Page 36: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

But it is clear that we can distinguish between good inductive arguments and badinductive arguments:

Women who drink this brand of vodka are beautiful, rich and attract the most handsome men

If I drink this vodka I will become beautiful, rich and start attracting the most handsome men

36

Page 37: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

Philosophers live in hope of finding a

systematic way to distinguish

between good and bad inductions

37

Page 38: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

Summary:

• actions are reason-driven

• for an action to be reason-driven is for it to be:

• motivated by desire

• guided by belief

• it is not possible to argue anyone into a desire

• if you want to satisfy users’ desires it is their beliefs you need to address

• users’ beliefs can be changed and brought into being rationally, irrationally or non-rationally

38

Page 39: Marianne Talbot's talk at UX Brighton

If you want to inspire trust it is

always better to change someone’s

beliefs by rational means!

39