maricopa county department of transportation major streets
TRANSCRIPT
Maricopa County Department of TransportationMAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES PLAN
Adopted April 18, 2001Revised September 2004
Revised June 2011
Policy Document and Street Classification Atlas
This version of the Major Streets and Routes Plan (MSRP) revises the original plan and the 2004 revisions. Looking ahead to pending updates to the classification systems of towns and cities in Maricopa County, the original MSRP stipulated a periodic review and modification of the street functional classification portion of the plan. This revision incorporates the following changes: (1) as anticipated, many of the communities in the County have updated either their general or transportation plans in the time since the adoption of the first MSRP; (2) a new roadway classification, the Arizona Parkway, has been added to the Maricopa County street classification system and the expressway classification has been removed; and (3) a series of regional framework studies have been conducted by the Maricopa Association of Governments to establish comprehensive roadway networks in parts of the West Valley.
Preface to 2011 Revision
1. Introduction........................................................................................................................1
2. Functional Classification Categorization.............................................................................1
3. Geometric Design Standards..............................................................................................4
4. Street Classification Atlas..................................................................................................5
Roadway Cross-Section Schematics......................................................................................10
Map Index.............................................................................................................................13
Table of Contents
Page 1 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
1. INTRODUCTIONThe Board of Supervisors adopted the latest edition of the Transportation System Plan (TSP) for Maricopa County on February 7, 2007. The TSP is the implementation component of the transportation element of the Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan. Earlier editions of the TSP identified the need for a Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan (MSRP).
The MSRP is an important tool for planning future development along County roads. It insures adequate visibility and access, protects property values and the neighborhood character, and enhances the unique qualities of County areas. It also minimizes unnecessary costs and impact to property owners and the public as designated roadways are improved.
The Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) Roadway Design Manual is the controlling document for all roadway specifications and requirements. Any references herein to the MCDOT Roadway Design Manual are to the edition adopted November 3, 1993 and revised April 2004. It is currently available online at: http://www.mcdot.maricopa.gov/manuals/eng_manuals/roadDesign/RoadwayCover_2004.pdf
2. FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION CATEGORIZATION
Functional classification is the process by which roads are grouped into classes according to the kind of service they provide. The basic functional classifications used in the MSRP are Arizona Parkway, Principal Arterial, Minor Arterial, Major Collector, and Minor Collector. Local Streets are included for reference only and are not part of the MSRP. Using national classification criteria, these
systems are classified based on the trips served and the operational characteristics of the streets or highways. Distinctions are made between rural and urban classifications, as discussed below and illustrated in Figures 1 through 9 on pages 10 to 12. For more detailed information please see the MCDOT Roadway Design Manual.
Level of Service and Roadway ClassificationsDefinitions of the desired Level of Service (LOS) designations for each roadway section referenced in the roadway function classifications is as follows:
A: Free flow, with low volumes and high speeds
B: Reasonably free flow, speeds beginning to be restricted by traffic conditions
C: Stable flow zone, most drivers restricted in freedom to select their own speed
D: Approaching unstable flow, drivers have little freedom to maneuver
E: Unstable flow, may be short stoppages
F: Forced or breakdown flow
Table 2.1: Urban and Rural Roadway Planning Level Traffic Volumes in Chapter 2 of the MCDOT Roadway Design Manual provides general ranges of traffic volumes that can be expected for various roadway types. Please consult the latest edition of the Roadway Design Manual for current traffic volumes. Also, please note that volumes shown in the above mentioned Table 2.1 are not used to determine roadway classifications in the MSRP. Roadway classifications are determined primarily by definition and supported by traffic analysis indicating the desired LOS.
Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan
Page 2 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
Rural Principal ArterialA rural principal arterial road includes the following service characteristics:
• Traffic movements with trip length and density suitable for substantial statewide travel
• Traffic movements between urban areas with populations over 25,000
• Traffic movements at high speeds• Divided four-lane roads• Desired LOS C
Rural Minor ArterialA rural minor arterial road includes the following service characteristics:
• Traffic movements with trip length and density suitable for integrated interstate or inter-county service
• Traffic movements between urban areas or other traffic generators with populations less than 25,000
• Traffic movements at high speeds• Undivided four-lane roads• Striped for one or two lanes in each direction
with auxiliary lanes at intersections as required by traffic volumes
• Desired LOS C
Rural Major CollectorA rural major collector road includes the following service characteristics:
• Traffic movements with trip length and density suitable for inter-county service
• Traffic movements between traffic generators, between traffic generators and larger cities, and between traffic generators and routes of a higher classification
• Traffic movements subject to a low level of side friction
• Development may front directly on the road • Controlled intersection spacing of 2 miles or
greater • Striped for one lane in each direction with a
continuous left turn lane• Desired LOS C
Rural Minor CollectorA rural minor collector road includes the following service characteristics:
• Traffic movements between local roads and collector roads
• Traffic movements between smaller communities and developed areas
• Traffic movements between locally important traffic generators within their remote regions
• Two-lane undivided roads with intersections at grade, and designed to take a minimum interference of traffic from driveways appropriate to a rural setting
• Striped for one lane in each direction• Desired LOS B
Rural Local RoadA rural local road includes the following service characteristics:
• Two-lane undivided roads with intersections at grade
• Traffic movements between collectors and adjacent lands
• Traffic movements involving relatively short distances
• Desired LOS A
Urban Principal ArterialAn urban principal arterial road includes the following service characteristics:
• Traffic movements in urban areas consisting
2. Functional Classification Categorization
Page 3 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
of through movements and major circulation movements in these areas
• Traffic movements involving a large portion of the total urban area travel on a minimum of mileage
• Posted speeds less than or equal to 45 mph• Divided four-lane or six-lane roads• Striped for two or three lanes in each direction
with a median and exclusive turn lanes where applicable
• Desired LOS D
Urban Minor ArterialAn urban minor arterial road includes the following service characteristics:
• Traffic movements in urban areas consisting of major circulation movements within these areas, with more emphasis on land access than major roads
• Traffic movements do not penetrate residential neighborhoods
• Traffic movements at moderate speeds with partially controlled access facilities
• Undivided four-lane with intersections at grade• Striped for two lanes in each direction with a
center left turn lane• Desired LOS C
Urban Major and Minor CollectorUrban major and minor collector roads include the following service characteristics:
• Traffic movements in urban areas consisting of both land access service and traffic circulation
• Traffic movements subject to high levels of median and side friction
• Traffic movements penetrate local areas• Development may front directly on the road• Has more than 10 uncontrolled access points
per mile on one side
• Local areas include residential neighborhoods, commercial, and industrial areas
• Traffic capacity for an urban major collector road is limited not by the typical capacity of the road section, but instead by the desirability of maintaining acceptable traffic levels by the use of continuous center left turn lanes rather than intermittent left-turn lanes
• An urban minor collector road maintains acceptable traffic levels that will not affect residential neighborhoods adversely
• Urban “major” or “minor” classifications shall be made at MCDOT’s discretion
• Desired LOS C (major collector) and LOS B (minor collector)
Urban Local RoadAn urban local road includes the following service characteristics:
• Two-lane undivided roads with intersections at grade with frequent driveway access
• Traffic movements between adjacent lands and collectors or other roads of higher classification
• Traffic movements over relatively short distances, less than 8 blocks long in most cases
• Desired LOS A
Arizona ParkwayAn Arizona Parkway includes the following service characteristics:
• Divided roadway with access to abutting land generally limited to right in – right out
• Higher vehicle capacity • Faster travel times • Better gas mileage due to fewer stops and less
idling at intersections • Less potential for accidents at intersections due
to elimination of left turns• Grade separated intersections or at-grade,
2. Functional Classification Categorization
Page 4 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
signalized intersections no less than one mile apart
• Typically four or more lanes in width constructed on 200 feet of right-of-way
Special Circumstances ClassificationThere are road classifications used by cities and occasionally in Maricopa County that do not fit conveniently in any of the functional classifications defined in the MSRP. These special roads either do not occur often enough to warrant their own classification or they combine characteristics in such a way that they cannot be classified as a typical parkway, arterial, collector, or local street.
In these instances, the County Engineer, or his or her designee, will make the decision as to when and where these cross-sections will be applied. This can be based on approved general plans, capacity requirements, or other circumstances requiring an alternative cross-section. These special circumstances may require additional right-of-way, number of lanes, urban or rural designation, or other unique design requirements.
3. GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS
The previous section presented the functional classifications used by Maricopa County to classify County streets. Presented in this section are the general geometric design standards associated with each classification.
The latest edition of the MCDOT Roadway Design Manual should be consulted for specific design guidance.
Roadway Cross-SectionsThe typical urban roadway width, right-of-way requirements, and number of lanes are provided in Table 1 (in feet). The cross-sections for parkway, principal arterial, minor arterial, major collector, minor collector, and local street classifications are shown graphically in Figures 1 through 9 on pages 10 to 12.
Table 1. Typical Urban Roadway Cross-Sections
ClassificationStreet Width (feet)
ROW Width (feet)
Number of Lanes (typical)
Arizona Parkway 162 200 6
Principal Arterial 101 130* 6
Minor Arterial 73 130 5
Major Collector 49 80 3
Minor Collector 40 60 2
Local 31 50 2*Rural Principal Arterial requires 150 feet of right-of-way.
It is generally anticipated that right-of way will be preserved as follows: 130’ for section line roadways; 80’ for mid-section line roadways; and 60’ for quarter-section line roadways.
Bicycle LanesBicycle lanes are included in the standard cross-sections for all principal arterial, minor arterial, and major collector streets. Bicycles are accommodated on minor collector and local streets with wide outside lanes, possibly sharing a parking lane. For an Arizona Parkway, a shoulder is recommended to accommodate bicycles. Curb opening catch basins should be used rather than grated inlets due to the potential for bicycles adjacent to the gutter pan.
The minimum bicycle lane width on an urban street with curb-and-gutter shall be four feet, measured from the edge of the vehicle lane to the edge of the
3. Geometric Design Standards
Page 5 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
gutter pan. The minimum bicycle lane width on non-curbed rural streets shall be five feet.
PedestriansA five foot (minimum) sidewalk is required for all urban cross-sections, except the Arizona Parkway. For an Arizona Parkway in urban areas, a six foot (minimum) sidewalk is recommended to accommodate pedestrians.
Bus PulloutsRight-of-way for bus pullouts and shelters should be preserved at all intersections of all principal arterial/principal arterial, principal arterial/minor arterial, and minor arterial/minor arterial intersections. See the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) Uniform Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction for details.
Access ManagementAccess management is defined as the regulation of vehicular access to public roadways from adjoining property. This is provided through legal, administrative, and technical strategies available to a political jurisdiction under its police powers in order to maintain the health, safety, and welfare of the jurisdiction’s residents. Access management regulates the level of access control on roadways and is needed to help retain the capacity of public highways, maintain public safety, and retain access to private land. Typically, access management decisions are made during a corridor study or design of roadway improvements.
AZTech™AZTech™ is partnership between MCDOT, the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), MAG, and cities and towns in the Phoenix metropolitan area that brings together decision makers and practitioners with a consensus-based
approach to integrating and operating a multimodal regional transportation system. Through the application of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) technology, AZTech™ fosters integration of local traffic management and traveler information services on a cross-jurisdictional, regional basis to promote seamless transportation service for the traveling public.
AZTech™ began in 1996, on the strength of a model demonstration grant won by MCDOT and ADOT. The award’s objective was to exhibit the strengths and benefits of ITS and regional cooperation in both traffic management and the distribution of traveler information. After successfully completing the initial award, AZTech™ continues today as a voluntary, thriving, beneficial partnership for the region.
The partnership provides many benefits for both travelers and traffic managers. For the traveling public, the AZTech™ program delivers traffic coordination, traffic information and incident management from a regional perspective. Methods include motorist message signs, coordinated traffic signals, travel time information via phone and website, and incident and congestion information relayed through television and radio. For the professional traffic manager, AZTech™ has been able to integrate the many individual local and state government management systems into a regional system of traffic monitoring and control. Project specific decisions are made during roadway improvement design.
4. STREET CLASSIFICATION ATLAS
This section includes the functional classification maps that designate the future classification for the Arizona Parkways, arterial roadways, and collector roadways portion of the 2,478 miles of roads that
4. Street Classification Atlas
Page 6 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
are in the Maricopa County Road Inventory System. The following are assumptions and guidelines that were utilized in coding these maps. Please note that no distinction is made between rural and urban classifications.
Primary Purpose The primary purpose of the MSRP is to identify future roadway classifications for county roads. Identification of roadway classifications for roadways within cities or towns is included for the purpose of showing continuity with county roadways. Generally the classification for the county roadway is matched to the adjacent city or town roadway. A primary objective is to facilitate right-of-way preservation for future roadways. However, assignment of a roadway to a particular functional classification is not a guarantee that roadway improvements will be constructed in the future.
Municipal Functional Classification ResourcesA roadway’s classification is identified as shown on the most recently updated and adopted/accepted planning document. In many cases this is a municipality’s general plan. In other cases, it might constitute a regional transportation framework study.
The municipal functional classification documents referenced include:
• City of Avondale General Plan Update (2002)• Town of Buckeye Transportation Master Plan
(Draft, 2010)• Town of Carefree General Plan (2002)• Town of Cave Creek General Plan (2005)• City of Chandler Transportation Master Plan
Update (2010)• City of El Mirage – staff designation (2010)
• Town of Fountain Hills General Plan (2010)• Town of Gila Bend General Plan Update (2006)• Town of Gilbert General Plan (2010)• City of Glendale Transportation Plan (2009)• City of Goodyear General Plan (2010)• City of Litchfield Park General Plan Update
(2010)• City of Mesa Transportation Plan (2002)• Town of Paradise Valley General Plan (2003)• City of Peoria General Plan (2010)• City of Phoenix Street Classification Map (2010)• Town of Queen Creek General Plan Update
(2008)• City of Scottsdale Street Classification Map
(2008)• City of Surprise General Plan (2010)• City of Tempe General Plan (2003)• City of Tolleson General Plan (2005)• Town of Youngtown General Plan (2003)
Municipal functional classification designations, as they relate to the county’s categorization, are summarized in Table 2.
The Town of Guadalupe is not included in this list because it does not have a functional classification map. The arterials within Guadalupe are included in the City of Tempe’s General Plan.
The Town of Wickenburg is not included in this list because its 2003 General Plan illustrates only existing and future roadways, not roadway classifications. The MAG Hassayampa Valley Framework Study for the Wickenburg Area (November 2010) is used instead, as cited in Table 2 and confirmed by municipal staff.
The City of El Mirage is included in the list, but not in the table, as no functional classification map yet exists for the city; however, city staff clarified intended classification categories for the purpose of this publication.
4. Street Classification Atlas
Page 7 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
4. Street Classification Atlas
Table 2. County/Municipal Functional Classification System Comparison
JurisdictionMCDOT Functional Classification Categories
Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector
Avondale Arterial; RRS Major Collector N/A N/A
Buckeye Arterial N/A N/A N/A
Carefree Arterial N/A Collector Minor Collector
Cave Creek Principal Arterial N/A Major Collector Minor Collector
Chandler Major Arterial Minor Arterial N/A N/A
Fountain Hills Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Major Collector Limited Collector; Minor Collector
Gila Bend Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Collector N/A
Gilbert Major Arterial; RRS Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector
Glendale Major Arterial; Superstreet
Arterial Collector N/A
Goodyear Scenic Arterial; Major Arterial; Arterial
City Center Arterial N/A N/A
Litchfield Park Arterial N/A Collector N/A
Mesa Arterial (6 lanes); Parkway
Arterial (4 lanes) N/A N/A
Paradise Valley Major Arterial N/A Minor Arterial Collector
Peoria Principal Arterial; Major Arterial
Minor Arterial Major Collector Collector
Phoenix Major Arterial Arterial Collector Minor Collector
Queen Creek Principal Arterial Arterial Collector N/A
Scottsdale Major Arterial Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector
Surprise Major Arterial Minor Arterial N/A N/A
Tempe Arterial N/A N/A N/A
Tolleson Major Street N/A N/A N/A
Youngtown Arterial; RRS N/A Major Collector N/A
Page 8 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
4. Street Classification Atlas
Municipal functional classifications are assigned according to the best match of the county’s functional classification system. For example, if a municipality classifies a minor arterial as a six-lane roadway with 130 feet of right-of-way, it is depicted as a principal arterial roadway, as it best matches this classification within the county’s system. However, if a municipality classifies a minor arterial as having 80 feet of right-of-way and only two lanes, it would most closely match the county’s major collector category.
Framework StudiesThe framework studies referenced include:
• MAG I-10/Hassayampa Valley Transportation Framework Study (September 2007)
• MAG I-8 and I-10/Hidden Valley Transportation Framework Study (October 2009)
• ADOT Statewide Transportation Planning Framework Study (March 2010)
• MAG Hassayampa Valley Framework Study - Wickenburg Area (November 2010)
MCDOT Corridor StudiesThe MSRP incorporates the recommended roadway alignments identified in Corridor Feasibility Studies and Corridor Improvement Studies conducted by MCDOT. A summary of these studies can be found on the MCDOT website (http://www.mcdot.maricopa.gov).
Roadway NamesRoadway names are identified as shown on municipal general plans, transportation master plans, and/or regional transportation framework studies.
Functional Classification DistinctionsMany local jurisdictions do not distinguish between major and minor arterials or between major and minor collectors in their transportation plans. These include:
• City of Avondale• Town of Buckeye• Town of Carefree• Town of Cave Creek• City of El Mirage• City of Glendale• City of Litchfield Park• City of Peoria• City of Tempe• City of Tolleson• Town of Youngtown
In order to preserve the maximum required right-of-way, roadways in these jurisdictions are classified as major arterials and major collectors.
It should also be noted that many local jurisdictions do not distinguish between current and future roadways in their transportation plans, as the plan is a snapshot of the intended roadway network. Thus, roadways illustrated as future in the street classification maps are: (1) specifically classified as “future” in the municipal transportation plan or framework study, (2) illustrated in a transportation plan, but non-existent in the Streetnet file (comprehensive county roadway network compilation updated on a weekly basis), thus implying that they do not exist today, or (3) classified as future in the county RoadRunner file (inventory of roadways and their classifications in non-incorporated areas).
Page 9 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
Major and Minor Collectors All collectors in the unincorporated areas are shown. However, only collectors in incorporated areas that complete the grid on the periphery of cities and towns or provide connectivity between major and minor arterials are shown.
Municipal Planning Areas (MPA)Roadways planned in unincorporated areas as part of a town or city MPA are classified according to the municipal network functional categorization, as opposed to the county’s, as the roadway will likely ultimately be built and maintained by the town or city jurisdiction.
Shared RoadwaysSimilarly, when a roadway is shared by a city or town and the county (north-south or east-west side divisions), ownership is categorized as a county roadway, however classified according to the town or city’s functional classification plan.
High Capacity RoadwaysMaricopa County does not own or operate any freeways or expressways. High capacity and access controlled roadways (metropolitan state routes/freeways) are depicted separate from the local roadway system to provide regional context. They are categorized in three ways: Existing; Planned (e.g., adopted alignment, funding available for some degree of improvement over existing conditions); or Proposed (e.g., accepted corridor, no funding for improvements, preliminary design only). U.S. highways and state routes that are limited access and/or rural in nature are depicted as “Highways.” U.S. highways and state routes that traverse incorporated areas and function as part of the local roadway network (e.g., principal arterial) are classified according to each jurisdiction’s functional classification plan.
Indian Community RoadwaysRoadway corridors within an Indian Community are illustrated as “other” to provide regional connectivity context. Those roadways that are maintained by the county, however, due to their regional significance, are classified per the RoadRunner file.
Adjacent CountiesRoadways in adjacent counties are simply depicted with a solid line representing existing, and dashed line for future; however, no functional classification designations are assigned. Roadway network information for adjacent counties was pulled from a variety of sources, including:
• ADOT Statewide Transportation Planning Framework Study (March 2010), which includes principal arterial and higher network information statewide
• MAG Hassayampa Valley Framework Study for the Wickenburg Area (November 2010), which includes some network information for Yavapai County
• La Paz County Comprehensive Plan (2010)• Yuma County Comprehensive Plan (2010)• Pima County 2040 Regional Transportation Plan
(2010)• Pinal County Comprehensive Plan (2009)• Yavapai County Road Centerlines and Routes GIS
shapefile (2010)• MAG I-8 and I-10/Hidden Valley Transportation
Framework Study (October 2009), which includes the Pinal County Regionally Significant Routes for Safety and Mobility network
• Yavapai County Comprehensive Plan (2003)
4. Street Classification Atlas
Page 10 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
Figure 1. Parkway Cross-Section
Figure 2. Urban Principal Arterial Cross-Section
Figure 3. Rural Principal Arterial Cross-Section
Roadway Cross-Sections
Page 11 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
Figure 4. Urban Minor Arterial Cross-Section
Figure 5. Rural Minor Arterial Cross-Section
Figure 6. Urban Major Collector Cross-Section
Roadway Cross-Sections
Page 12 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
Figure 7. Rural Major Collector Cross-Section
Figure 8. Urban Minor Collector Cross-Section
Figure 9. Rural Minor Collector Cross-Section
Roadway Cross-Sections
Page 13 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan Map Index
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
Page 14 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan Municipalities Index
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
Wickenburg
Buckeye
Gila Bend
Surprise
Goodyear
Avondale
TollesonLitchfield
Park
Glendale
Phoenix
ParadiseValley
Scottsdale
FountainHills
Peoria
Tempe Mesa
Chandler
Gilbert
QueenCreek
Guadalupe
CaveCreek Carefree
Youngtown
El Mirage
Page 15 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
Eagl
e Ey
e Rd
Aguila Rd
Blac
k M
ount
ain
Pkw
y
BNSF Railway
Eagl
e Ey
e Pa
rkw
ay
W. Wickenburg Way
W. Caballeros Rd
Cherokee Ln
Fore
paug
h Pe
ak R
d
YAVAPAI COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
LA P
AZ
COU
NTY
Twin
Pea
ks R
dHarquahala Mountains
Wilderness Area
Tres AlamosWilderness Area
Mar
icop
a Co
unty
Maj
or S
tree
ts a
nd R
oute
s Pl
anM
ap 1
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.
MCDOT Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Parkway
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Municipal Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial
Parkway
Other Roadway
Canal
Railroad
Park Area
High Capacity Roadway
Planned Freeway
Freeway
Highway
Proposed Freeway
Page 16 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
Mar
icop
a Co
unty
Maj
or S
tree
ts a
nd R
oute
s Pl
anM
ap 2
Blac
k M
ount
ain
Pkw
y
211t
h Av
e
Wild
Ros
ePk
wy
Hid
den
Wat
ers
Pkw
y
Vultu
re M
ine
Rd
Castle Hot S
prings R
d
Vultu
re M
ine
Rd
BNSF Railway
Black Mountain Rd
BNSF Railway
Twin
Pea
ks R
d
Turn
er P
kwy
Cherokee Ln
W. Caballeros Rd
W. Wickenburg Way
Joy Ranch Pkwy
Has
saya
mpa
Frw
y
SR 74 ExtensionLake Pleasant Frwy
YAVAPAI COUNTYMARICOPA COUNTY
ConstellationPark
Hassayampa RiverCanyon Wilderness
Area
NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.
MCDOT Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Parkway
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Municipal Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial
Parkway
Other Roadway
Canal
Railroad
Park Area
High Capacity Roadway
Planned Freeway
Freeway
Highway
Proposed Freeway
Page 17 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
211t
h Av
e
Jack
rabb
it Tr
163r
d Av
e Cloud Rd
Joy Ranch Rd
Desert Hills Dr
Honda Bow Rd
New
Riv
er R
d
Carefree Hwy
Jenny Lin Rd
Anthem Way
Lake Pleasant Frwy
MARICOPA COUNTY
YAVAPAI COUNTY
Cast
le H
ot S
prin
gs R
d
Prescott National Forest
Lake PleasantRegional Park
Hell's CanyonWilderness Area
Mar
icop
a Co
unty
Maj
or S
tree
ts a
nd R
oute
s Pl
anM
ap 3
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.
MCDOT Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Parkway
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Municipal Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial
Parkway
Other Roadway
Canal
Railroad
Park Area
High Capacity Roadway
Planned Freeway
Freeway
Highway
Proposed Freeway
Page 18 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
Mar
icop
a Co
unty
Maj
or S
tree
ts a
nd R
oute
s Pl
anM
ap 4
Scho
ol H
ouse
Rd
Cave
Cre
ek R
d
32nd
St
24th
St
16th
St
7th
St
7th
Ave
Pim
a Rd
Tom
Dar
lingt
on D
r
136t
h St
Desert Hills Dr
Honda Bow Rd
Joy Ranch Rd
Bartlett Dam Rd
Seve
n Sp
rings
Rd
MARICOPA COUNTY
YAVAPAI COUNTY
GILA COUNTY
YAVAPAI COUNTY
Circle Mountain Rd
New River Rd
Tonto National Forest
Cave CreekRegional
Park
NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.
MCDOT Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Parkway
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Municipal Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial
Parkway
Other Roadway
Canal
Railroad
Park Area
High Capacity Roadway
Planned Freeway
Freeway
Highway
Proposed Freeway
Page 19 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
Mar
icop
a Co
unty
Maj
or S
tree
ts a
nd R
oute
s Pl
anM
ap 5
Bartlett Dam Rd
MARICOPA COUNTY
YAVAPAI COUNTY
YAVAPAI COUNTY
GILA COUNTY
MARICOPA CO
U
NTY
GILA COU
NTY
Tonto National Forest
NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.
MCDOT Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Parkway
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Municipal Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial
Parkway
Other Roadway
Canal
Railroad
Park Area
High Capacity Roadway
Planned Freeway
Freeway
Highway
Proposed Freeway
Page 20 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
Mar
icop
a Co
unty
Maj
or S
tree
ts a
nd R
oute
s Pl
anM
ap 6
Camelback Pkwy
Glendale Ave
Northern Pkwy
Baseline Rd
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
Lower Buckeye Rd
Yuma Rd
Van Buren St
McDowell Rd
Thomas Rd
Indian School Rd
Eagl
e Ey
e Rd
Salome Hwy
Aguila Rd
483r
d Av
e
491s
t Ave
499t
h Av
e
507t
h Av
e
Har
quah
ala
Valle
y Rd
523r
d Av
e
531s
t Ave
539t
h Av
e
547t
h Av
e
Olive AveCAP Canal
MAR
ICO
PA C
OU
NTY
LA P
AZ
COU
NTY
Centennial Rd Courthouse Rd
Buckeye Rd
Dove Valley Rd
Tonopah Pkwy
Eagletail MountainsWilderness Area
Big Horn MountainsWilderness Area
Hummingbird SpringsWilderness Area
NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.
MCDOT Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Parkway
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Municipal Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial
Parkway
Other Roadway
Canal
Railroad
Park Area
High Capacity Roadway
Planned Freeway
Freeway
Highway
Proposed Freeway
Page 21 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
Mar
icop
a Co
unty
Maj
or S
tree
ts a
nd R
oute
s Pl
anM
ap 7
Rain
bow
Rd
Wat
son
Rd
Apac
he R
d
Mill
er R
d
Rook
s Rd
Turn
er R
d
Wils
on R
d
Palo
Ver
de R
d
Brun
er R
d
John
son
Rd
Win
ters
burg
Rd
387t
h Av
e
395t
h Av
e
315t
h Av
e
323r
d Av
e
331s
t Ave
339t
h Av
e
347t
h Av
e
355t
h Av
e
363r
d Av
e
371s
t Ave
Tono
pah
Rd
411t
h Av
e
Camelback Pkwy
Bethany Home Rd
Glendale Ave
Northern Pkwy
Olive Ave
Peoria Ave
Cactus Rd
Greenway Rd
Bell Rd
Sun Valley Pkwy
MC-85
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
Lower Buckeye Rd
Yuma Rd
Van Buren St
McDowell Rd
Thomas Rd
Indian School Rd
Deer Valley Rd
Pinnacle Peak Rd
Jomax Rd
Patton Rd
Dixileta Dr
Lone Mountain Rd
Dove Valley Rd
Wintersburg Pkwy
Turn
er P
kwy
Hid
den
Wat
ers
Pkw
y
Tono
pah
Pkw
y
Vultu
re M
ine
Rd
Wic
kenb
urg
Rd
BNSF Railway
CAP Canal
Sun
Valle
y Pk
wy
Wild
Ros
e Pk
wy
RID Canal
Has
saya
mpa
Frw
y
White Tanks Frwy
Has
saya
mpa
Frw
y
White Tank MountainRegional Park
NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.
MCDOT Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Parkway
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Municipal Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial
Parkway
Other Roadway
Canal
Railroad
Park Area
High Capacity Roadway
Planned Freeway
Freeway
Highway
Proposed Freeway
Page 22 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
Mar
icop
a Co
unty
Maj
or S
tree
ts a
nd R
oute
s Pl
anM
ap 8
Camelback Rd
Bethany Home Rd
Glendale Ave
Northern Ave
Dunlap/Olive Ave
Peoria Ave
Cactus Rd
Thunderbird/Waddell Rd
Greenway Rd
Bell Rd
Union Hills Dr
Beardsley Rd
Baseline Rd
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
Lower Buckeye Rd
Yuma/Buckeye Rd
Van Buren St
McDowell Rd
Thomas Rd
Indian School Rd
Deer Valley Rd
Pinnacle Peak Rd
Happy Valley Rd
Jomax Rd
99th
Ave
107t
h Av
e
Avon
dale
Blv
d
El M
irage
Rd
Dys
art R
d
Litc
hfie
ld R
d
Bulla
rd A
ve
Estr
ella
Pkw
y/Re
ems
Rd
Sariv
al R
d
Cott
on L
n
Citr
us R
d
Perr
yvill
e Rd
27th
Ave
35th
Ave
43rd
Ave
51st
Ave
59th
Ave
67th
Ave
75th
Ave
83rd
Ave
91st
Ave
Jack
rabb
it Tr
Airp
ort R
d
Dea
n Rd
Patton Rd
Dixileta Dr
Lone Mountain Rd
Dove Valley Rd
Lake
Ple
asan
t Pkw
y
Union Pacific Railroad
BNSF Railway
Bear
dsle
y Ca
nal
CAP Canal
RID Canal
Grand Canal
Arizona Canal
30
WhiteTank
MountainRegional
Park
Adobe DamRegional
Park
NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.
MCDOT Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Parkway
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Municipal Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial
Parkway
Other Roadway
Canal
Railroad
Park Area
High Capacity Roadway
Planned Freeway
Freeway
Highway
Proposed Freeway
Page 23 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
Mar
icop
a Co
unty
Maj
or S
tree
ts a
nd R
oute
s Pl
anM
ap 9
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
Camelback Rd
Bethany Home Rd
Glendale Ave
Northern Ave
Dunlap/Olive Ave
Peoria Ave
Cactus Rd
Thunderbird/Waddell Rd
Greenway Rd
Bell Rd
Union Hills Dr
Beardsley Rd
Baseline Rd
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
University Dr
Brown Rd
McKellips Rd
McDowell Rd
Thomas Rd
Indian School Rd
Deer Valley Rd
Pinnacle Peak Rd
Happy Valley Rd
Jomax Rd
Dob
son
Rd
Pric
e Rd
McC
linto
ck D
r
Rura
l Rd
Kyre
ne R
d
Prie
st D
r
48th
St
40th
St
32nd
St
24th
St
16th
St
7th
St
Hig
ley
Rd
Gre
enfie
ld R
d
Val V
ista
Dr
Lind
say
Rd
Gilb
ert R
d
Stap
ley
Rd
Mes
a D
r
Coun
try
Club
Dr
Alm
a Sc
hool
Rd
7th
Ave
19th
Ave
Dynamite Blvd
Dixileta Dr
Lone Mountain Rd
Sonoran Blvd
Cave
Cre
ek R
d
27th
Ave
Rio Verde Dr
McD
owel
l Mou
ntai
n Rd
56th
St
Tatu
m B
lvd
104t
h St
96th
St
Pim
a Rd
Hay
den
Rd
Scot
tsda
le R
d
64th
St
CAP Canal
Arizona Canal
Union Pacific Railroad
Carefree Hwy
Cloud Rd Stagecoach Pass
Mus
tang
Way
Blac
k M
ount
ain
Blvd
McDowell Rd
Thomas Rd
Shea Blvd
144t
h St
136t
h St
168t
h St
160t
h St
152n
d St
176t
h St
McDowell MountainRegional Park
Tonto National Forest
PhoenixMountainsPreserve
PapagoPark
TontoN.F.
NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.
MCDOT Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Parkway
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Municipal Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial
Parkway
Other Roadway
Canal
Railroad
Park Area
High Capacity Roadway
Planned Freeway
Freeway
Highway
Proposed Freeway
Page 24 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
Mar
icop
a Co
unty
Maj
or S
tree
ts a
nd R
oute
s Pl
anM
ap 1
0
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
Baseline Rd
Southern Ave
Broadway Rd
University Dr
Brown Rd
McKellips
McDowell Rd
Thomas Rd
Haw
es R
d
Mou
ntai
n V
iew
Rd
Gol
dfie
ld R
d
Tom
ahaw
k Rd
Idah
o Rd
Ironw
ood
Dr
Mer
idia
n Rd
Sign
al B
utte
Rd
Cris
mon
Rd
Ells
wor
th R
d
Bush Hwy
Use
ry P
ass
Rd
Rio Verde Dr
McD
owel
l Mou
ntai
n Rd
Mus
tang
Way
BIA
51
For t M
cDo
wel
l Rd
MARICOPA COUNTY
PINAL COUNTY
GILA COUNTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
Tonto National Forest
NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.
MCDOT Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Parkway
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Municipal Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial
Parkway
Other Roadway
Canal
Railroad
Park Area
High Capacity Roadway
Planned Freeway
Freeway
Highway
Proposed Freeway
Page 25 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
Mar
icop
a Co
unty
Maj
or S
tree
ts a
nd R
oute
s Pl
anM
ap 1
1
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
MARICOPA COUNTY
PINAL COUNTY
GILA COU
NTY
Tonto National Forest
NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.
MCDOT Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Parkway
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Municipal Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial
Parkway
Other Roadway
Canal
Railroad
Park Area
High Capacity Roadway
Planned Freeway
Freeway
Highway
Proposed Freeway
Page 26 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
Mar
icop
a Co
unty
Maj
or S
tree
ts a
nd R
oute
s Pl
anM
ap 1
2
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
Tono
pah
Rd
411t
h Av
e
477t
h Av
e
491s
t Ave
507t
h Av
e
Har
quah
ala
Valle
y Rd
523r
d Av
e
531s
t Ave
539t
h Av
e
547t
h Av
e
Narramore Rd
Elliot Rd
Dobbins Rd
Willams Field Rd
Lahman Rd
Highline Rd
Rhodes Ave
Butterfield Stage Rd
571s
t Ave
Hyder Rd
Union Pacific
Railroad
Oat
man
Rd
Painted Rock Dam
Rd
MAR
ICO
PA C
OU
NTY
YUM
A C
OU
NTY
Ray Rd
Eagletail MountainsWilderness Area
Signal MountainWilderness Area
Woolsey PeakWilderness Area
NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.
MCDOT Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Parkway
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Municipal Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial
Parkway
Other Roadway
Canal
Railroad
Park Area
High Capacity Roadway
Planned Freeway
Freeway
Highway
Proposed Freeway
Page 27 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
Mar
icop
a Co
unty
Maj
or S
tree
ts a
nd R
oute
s Pl
anM
ap 1
3
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
Germann Rd
Williams Field Rd
Ray Rd
Narramore Rd
Elliot Rd
Hazen Rd
Riggs Rd
Patterson Rd
Pecos Rd
Woods Rd
Pierpoint Rd
Fornes Rd
Watermelon Rd
Powerline Rd
Maricopa Rd
Rain
bow
Rd
Wat
son
Rd
Apac
he R
d
Mill
er R
d
Rook
s Rd
Turn
er R
d
Wils
on R
d
Palo
Ver
de R
d
Brun
er R
d
John
son
Rd
Win
ters
burg
Rd
331s
t Ave
351s
t Ave
355t
h Av
e
Tono
pah
Rd
411t
h Av
e
Citr
us V
alle
y Rd
Gila
Blv
d
Stou
t Rd
Palo
ma
RdUnion Pacific Railroad
Union Pacific Railroad
Arlington Canal
Enterprise Canal
Gila Bend Canal
Old US 80
Hid
den
Wat
ers
Pkw
y
30
Woolsey PeakWilderness Area
BuckeyeHills
RegionalPark
Sonoran DesertNational
Monument
North Maricopa MountainsWilderness Area
NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.
MCDOT Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Parkway
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Municipal Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial
Parkway
Other Roadway
Canal
Railroad
Park Area
High Capacity Roadway
Planned Freeway
Freeway
Highway
Proposed Freeway
Page 28 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
Mar
icop
a Co
unty
Maj
or S
tree
ts a
nd R
oute
s Pl
anM
ap 1
4
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
Pecos Rd
Williams Field Rd
Ray Rd
Narramore Rd
Elliot Rd
Dobbins Rd
Sonoran Valley Pkwy
Schumacher Rd
Farrell Rd
Mahalia Rd
Kinney Rd
Amaranth Blvd
99th
Ave
107t
h Av
e
115t
h Av
e
123r
d Av
e
Dys
art R
d
Litc
hfie
ld R
d
Bulla
rd A
ve
Pebb
le C
reek
Pkw
y/Es
trel
la P
kwy
Sariv
al R
d
Estr
ella
Pkw
y/Co
tton
Ln
Citr
us R
d/Ra
inbo
w V
alle
y Rd
Perr
yvill
e Rd
51st
Ave
59th
Ave
67th
Ave
75th
Ave
83rd
Ave
91st
Ave
Jack
rabb
it Tr
Airp
ort R
d
27th
Ave
35th
Ave
43rd
Ave
99th
Ave
107t
h Av
e
115t
h Av
e
75th
Ave
83rd
Ave
91st
AveUnion Pacific
Railroad
Hassayampa Frwy
Hassayampa Frwy
MAR
ICO
PA C
OU
NTY
PIN
AL C
OU
NTY
de Anza Scenic Way
Queen Creek Rd
Germann Rd
Hunt Rd
Riggs Rd
Ocotillo Rd
Chandler Heights Rd
Patterson Rd
North MaricopaMountains
Wilderness Area
South MaricopaMountains
Wilderness Area
Sonoran DesertNational Monument
Estrella MountainRegional Park
SierraEstrella
WildernessArea
NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.
MCDOT Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Parkway
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Municipal Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial
Parkway
Other Roadway
Canal
Railroad
Park Area
High Capacity Roadway
Planned Freeway
Freeway
Highway
Proposed Freeway
Page 29 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
Mar
icop
a Co
unty
Maj
or S
tree
ts a
nd R
oute
s Pl
anM
ap 1
5
Queen Creek Rd
Germann Rd
Pecos Rd
Williams Field Rd
Ray Rd
Warner Rd
Elliot Rd
Guadalupe Rd
Hunt Hwy
Riggs Rd
Ocotillo Rd
Sesame Rd
Chandler Heights Rd
Casa Blanca Rd
Nelson Rd
Hor
sesh
oe R
d
Mur
phy
Rd
Dob
son
Rd
Pric
e Rd
McC
linto
ck D
r
Rura
l Rd
Kyre
ne R
d
Prie
st D
r
48th
St
40th
St
32nd
St
24th
St
16th
St
7th
St
Hig
ley
Rd
Gre
enfie
ld R
d
Val V
ista
Dr
Lind
say
Rd
Gilb
ert R
d
Coop
er R
d
McQ
ueen
Rd
7th
Ave
19th
Ave
Alm
a Sc
hool
Rd
Cons
olid
ated
Can
al
East
ern
Cana
l
RWCD
Can
al
Union Pacific Railroad
Hassayampa Frwy
Tem
pe C
analKy
rene
Can
al
Union Pacific Railroad
Hig
hlin
e Ca
nal
MARICOPA COUNTY
PINAL COUNTY
Phoenix South Mountain Park
Hohokam PimaNational Monument
NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.
MCDOT Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Parkway
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Municipal Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial
Parkway
Other Roadway
Canal
Railroad
Park Area
High Capacity Roadway
Planned Freeway
Freeway
Highway
Proposed Freeway
Page 30 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
Mar
icop
a Co
unty
Maj
or S
tree
ts a
nd R
oute
s Pl
anM
ap 1
6
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
Queen Creek Rd
Germann Rd
Pecos Rd
Williams Field Rd
Ray Rd
Warner Rd
Elliot Rd
Guadalupe Rd
Hunt Hwy
Riggs Rd
Chandler Heights Rd
Ocotillo Rd
Skyline Dr
Hunt Hwy
Florence Kelvin Hwy
Schn
epf R
d
Gol
dfie
ld R
d
Tom
ahaw
k Rd
Idah
o Rd
Vine
yard
Rd
Ironw
ood
Dr
Mer
idia
n Rd
Sign
al B
utte
Rd
Cris
mon
Rd
Ells
wor
th R
d
Rittenhouse Rd
Union Pacific Railroad
Magma Arizona Railro
ad
Union Pacific Railroad
Uni
on P
acifi
c Ra
ilroa
d
Williams Gateway Frwy
Nor
th-S
outh
Frw
y
802
MARICOPA COUNTY
PINAL COUNTY
TontoN.F.
NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.
MCDOT Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Parkway
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Municipal Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial
Parkway
Other Roadway
Canal
Railroad
Park Area
High Capacity Roadway
Planned Freeway
Freeway
Highway
Proposed Freeway
Page 31 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
Mar
icop
a Co
unty
Maj
or S
tree
ts a
nd R
oute
s Pl
anM
ap 1
7
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
Agua Caliente Rd
Oat
man
Rd
Painted RockD
am Rd
Union Pacific Railroad
Gila Bend Canal
YUM
A C
OU
NTY
MAR
ICO
PA C
OU
NTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
PIMA COUNTY
NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.
MCDOT Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Parkway
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Municipal Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial
Parkway
Other Roadway
Canal
Railroad
Park Area
High Capacity Roadway
Planned Freeway
Freeway
Highway
Proposed Freeway
Page 32 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
Mar
icop
a Co
unty
Maj
or S
tree
ts a
nd R
oute
s Pl
anM
ap 1
8
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
Pota
toe
Rd
Palo
ma
Rd
Citr
us V
alle
y Rd
Tucs
on, C
orne
lia, a
nd G
ila B
end
Railr
oad
Gila Bend Canal
Union Pacific Railroad
MARICOPA COUNTYPIMA COUNTY
Sonoran DesertNational Monument
NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.
MCDOT Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Parkway
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Municipal Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial
Parkway
Other Roadway
Canal
Railroad
Park Area
High Capacity Roadway
Planned Freeway
Freeway
Highway
Proposed Freeway
Page 33 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan
Mar
icop
a Co
unty
Maj
or S
tree
ts a
nd R
oute
s Pl
anM
ap 1
9
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19
Vekol Valley Rd
MAR
ICO
PA C
OU
NTY
PIN
AL C
OU
NTY
MARICOPA COUNTY
PIMA COUNTY
Sonoran DesertNational Monument
South Maricopa MountainsWilderness Area
Table TopWilderness Area
NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.
MCDOT Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Parkway
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Municipal Classification
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Principal Arterial
Parkway
Other Roadway
Canal
Railroad
Park Area
High Capacity Roadway
Planned Freeway
Freeway
Highway
Proposed Freeway