maricopa county department of transportation major streets

39
Maricopa County Department of Transportation MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES PLAN Adopted April 18, 2001 Revised September 2004 Revised June 2011 Policy Document and Street Classification Atlas

Upload: others

Post on 16-Oct-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Maricopa County Department of TransportationMAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES PLAN

Adopted April 18, 2001Revised September 2004

Revised June 2011

Policy Document and Street Classification Atlas

This version of the Major Streets and Routes Plan (MSRP) revises the original plan and the 2004 revisions. Looking ahead to pending updates to the classification systems of towns and cities in Maricopa County, the original MSRP stipulated a periodic review and modification of the street functional classification portion of the plan. This revision incorporates the following changes: (1) as anticipated, many of the communities in the County have updated either their general or transportation plans in the time since the adoption of the first MSRP; (2) a new roadway classification, the Arizona Parkway, has been added to the Maricopa County street classification system and the expressway classification has been removed; and (3) a series of regional framework studies have been conducted by the Maricopa Association of Governments to establish comprehensive roadway networks in parts of the West Valley.

Preface to 2011 Revision

1. Introduction........................................................................................................................1

2. Functional Classification Categorization.............................................................................1

3. Geometric Design Standards..............................................................................................4

4. Street Classification Atlas..................................................................................................5

Roadway Cross-Section Schematics......................................................................................10

Map Index.............................................................................................................................13

Table of Contents

Page 1 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

1. INTRODUCTIONThe Board of Supervisors adopted the latest edition of the Transportation System Plan (TSP) for Maricopa County on February 7, 2007. The TSP is the implementation component of the transportation element of the Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan. Earlier editions of the TSP identified the need for a Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan (MSRP).

The MSRP is an important tool for planning future development along County roads. It insures adequate visibility and access, protects property values and the neighborhood character, and enhances the unique qualities of County areas. It also minimizes unnecessary costs and impact to property owners and the public as designated roadways are improved.

The Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) Roadway Design Manual is the controlling document for all roadway specifications and requirements. Any references herein to the MCDOT Roadway Design Manual are to the edition adopted November 3, 1993 and revised April 2004. It is currently available online at: http://www.mcdot.maricopa.gov/manuals/eng_manuals/roadDesign/RoadwayCover_2004.pdf

2. FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION CATEGORIZATION

Functional classification is the process by which roads are grouped into classes according to the kind of service they provide. The basic functional classifications used in the MSRP are Arizona Parkway, Principal Arterial, Minor Arterial, Major Collector, and Minor Collector. Local Streets are included for reference only and are not part of the MSRP. Using national classification criteria, these

systems are classified based on the trips served and the operational characteristics of the streets or highways. Distinctions are made between rural and urban classifications, as discussed below and illustrated in Figures 1 through 9 on pages 10 to 12. For more detailed information please see the MCDOT Roadway Design Manual.

Level of Service and Roadway ClassificationsDefinitions of the desired Level of Service (LOS) designations for each roadway section referenced in the roadway function classifications is as follows:

A: Free flow, with low volumes and high speeds

B: Reasonably free flow, speeds beginning to be restricted by traffic conditions

C: Stable flow zone, most drivers restricted in freedom to select their own speed

D: Approaching unstable flow, drivers have little freedom to maneuver

E: Unstable flow, may be short stoppages

F: Forced or breakdown flow

Table 2.1: Urban and Rural Roadway Planning Level Traffic Volumes in Chapter 2 of the MCDOT Roadway Design Manual provides general ranges of traffic volumes that can be expected for various roadway types. Please consult the latest edition of the Roadway Design Manual for current traffic volumes. Also, please note that volumes shown in the above mentioned Table 2.1 are not used to determine roadway classifications in the MSRP. Roadway classifications are determined primarily by definition and supported by traffic analysis indicating the desired LOS.

Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan

Page 2 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

Rural Principal ArterialA rural principal arterial road includes the following service characteristics:

• Traffic movements with trip length and density suitable for substantial statewide travel

• Traffic movements between urban areas with populations over 25,000

• Traffic movements at high speeds• Divided four-lane roads• Desired LOS C

Rural Minor ArterialA rural minor arterial road includes the following service characteristics:

• Traffic movements with trip length and density suitable for integrated interstate or inter-county service

• Traffic movements between urban areas or other traffic generators with populations less than 25,000

• Traffic movements at high speeds• Undivided four-lane roads• Striped for one or two lanes in each direction

with auxiliary lanes at intersections as required by traffic volumes

• Desired LOS C

Rural Major CollectorA rural major collector road includes the following service characteristics:

• Traffic movements with trip length and density suitable for inter-county service

• Traffic movements between traffic generators, between traffic generators and larger cities, and between traffic generators and routes of a higher classification

• Traffic movements subject to a low level of side friction

• Development may front directly on the road • Controlled intersection spacing of 2 miles or

greater • Striped for one lane in each direction with a

continuous left turn lane• Desired LOS C

Rural Minor CollectorA rural minor collector road includes the following service characteristics:

• Traffic movements between local roads and collector roads

• Traffic movements between smaller communities and developed areas

• Traffic movements between locally important traffic generators within their remote regions

• Two-lane undivided roads with intersections at grade, and designed to take a minimum interference of traffic from driveways appropriate to a rural setting

• Striped for one lane in each direction• Desired LOS B

Rural Local RoadA rural local road includes the following service characteristics:

• Two-lane undivided roads with intersections at grade

• Traffic movements between collectors and adjacent lands

• Traffic movements involving relatively short distances

• Desired LOS A

Urban Principal ArterialAn urban principal arterial road includes the following service characteristics:

• Traffic movements in urban areas consisting

2. Functional Classification Categorization

Page 3 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

of through movements and major circulation movements in these areas

• Traffic movements involving a large portion of the total urban area travel on a minimum of mileage

• Posted speeds less than or equal to 45 mph• Divided four-lane or six-lane roads• Striped for two or three lanes in each direction

with a median and exclusive turn lanes where applicable

• Desired LOS D

Urban Minor ArterialAn urban minor arterial road includes the following service characteristics:

• Traffic movements in urban areas consisting of major circulation movements within these areas, with more emphasis on land access than major roads

• Traffic movements do not penetrate residential neighborhoods

• Traffic movements at moderate speeds with partially controlled access facilities

• Undivided four-lane with intersections at grade• Striped for two lanes in each direction with a

center left turn lane• Desired LOS C

Urban Major and Minor CollectorUrban major and minor collector roads include the following service characteristics:

• Traffic movements in urban areas consisting of both land access service and traffic circulation

• Traffic movements subject to high levels of median and side friction

• Traffic movements penetrate local areas• Development may front directly on the road• Has more than 10 uncontrolled access points

per mile on one side

• Local areas include residential neighborhoods, commercial, and industrial areas

• Traffic capacity for an urban major collector road is limited not by the typical capacity of the road section, but instead by the desirability of maintaining acceptable traffic levels by the use of continuous center left turn lanes rather than intermittent left-turn lanes

• An urban minor collector road maintains acceptable traffic levels that will not affect residential neighborhoods adversely

• Urban “major” or “minor” classifications shall be made at MCDOT’s discretion

• Desired LOS C (major collector) and LOS B (minor collector)

Urban Local RoadAn urban local road includes the following service characteristics:

• Two-lane undivided roads with intersections at grade with frequent driveway access

• Traffic movements between adjacent lands and collectors or other roads of higher classification

• Traffic movements over relatively short distances, less than 8 blocks long in most cases

• Desired LOS A

Arizona ParkwayAn Arizona Parkway includes the following service characteristics:

• Divided roadway with access to abutting land generally limited to right in – right out

• Higher vehicle capacity • Faster travel times • Better gas mileage due to fewer stops and less

idling at intersections • Less potential for accidents at intersections due

to elimination of left turns• Grade separated intersections or at-grade,

2. Functional Classification Categorization

Page 4 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

signalized intersections no less than one mile apart

• Typically four or more lanes in width constructed on 200 feet of right-of-way

Special Circumstances ClassificationThere are road classifications used by cities and occasionally in Maricopa County that do not fit conveniently in any of the functional classifications defined in the MSRP. These special roads either do not occur often enough to warrant their own classification or they combine characteristics in such a way that they cannot be classified as a typical parkway, arterial, collector, or local street.

In these instances, the County Engineer, or his or her designee, will make the decision as to when and where these cross-sections will be applied. This can be based on approved general plans, capacity requirements, or other circumstances requiring an alternative cross-section. These special circumstances may require additional right-of-way, number of lanes, urban or rural designation, or other unique design requirements.

3. GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS

The previous section presented the functional classifications used by Maricopa County to classify County streets. Presented in this section are the general geometric design standards associated with each classification.

The latest edition of the MCDOT Roadway Design Manual should be consulted for specific design guidance.

Roadway Cross-SectionsThe typical urban roadway width, right-of-way requirements, and number of lanes are provided in Table 1 (in feet). The cross-sections for parkway, principal arterial, minor arterial, major collector, minor collector, and local street classifications are shown graphically in Figures 1 through 9 on pages 10 to 12.

Table 1. Typical Urban Roadway Cross-Sections

ClassificationStreet Width (feet)

ROW Width (feet)

Number of Lanes (typical)

Arizona Parkway 162 200 6

Principal Arterial 101 130* 6

Minor Arterial 73 130 5

Major Collector 49 80 3

Minor Collector 40 60 2

Local 31 50 2*Rural Principal Arterial requires 150 feet of right-of-way.

It is generally anticipated that right-of way will be preserved as follows: 130’ for section line roadways; 80’ for mid-section line roadways; and 60’ for quarter-section line roadways.

Bicycle LanesBicycle lanes are included in the standard cross-sections for all principal arterial, minor arterial, and major collector streets. Bicycles are accommodated on minor collector and local streets with wide outside lanes, possibly sharing a parking lane. For an Arizona Parkway, a shoulder is recommended to accommodate bicycles. Curb opening catch basins should be used rather than grated inlets due to the potential for bicycles adjacent to the gutter pan.

The minimum bicycle lane width on an urban street with curb-and-gutter shall be four feet, measured from the edge of the vehicle lane to the edge of the

3. Geometric Design Standards

Page 5 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

gutter pan. The minimum bicycle lane width on non-curbed rural streets shall be five feet.

PedestriansA five foot (minimum) sidewalk is required for all urban cross-sections, except the Arizona Parkway. For an Arizona Parkway in urban areas, a six foot (minimum) sidewalk is recommended to accommodate pedestrians.

Bus PulloutsRight-of-way for bus pullouts and shelters should be preserved at all intersections of all principal arterial/principal arterial, principal arterial/minor arterial, and minor arterial/minor arterial intersections. See the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) Uniform Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction for details.

Access ManagementAccess management is defined as the regulation of vehicular access to public roadways from adjoining property. This is provided through legal, administrative, and technical strategies available to a political jurisdiction under its police powers in order to maintain the health, safety, and welfare of the jurisdiction’s residents. Access management regulates the level of access control on roadways and is needed to help retain the capacity of public highways, maintain public safety, and retain access to private land. Typically, access management decisions are made during a corridor study or design of roadway improvements.

AZTech™AZTech™ is partnership between MCDOT, the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), MAG, and cities and towns in the Phoenix metropolitan area that brings together decision makers and practitioners with a consensus-based

approach to integrating and operating a multimodal regional transportation system. Through the application of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) technology, AZTech™ fosters integration of local traffic management and traveler information services on a cross-jurisdictional, regional basis to promote seamless transportation service for the traveling public.

AZTech™ began in 1996, on the strength of a model demonstration grant won by MCDOT and ADOT. The award’s objective was to exhibit the strengths and benefits of ITS and regional cooperation in both traffic management and the distribution of traveler information. After successfully completing the initial award, AZTech™ continues today as a voluntary, thriving, beneficial partnership for the region.

The partnership provides many benefits for both travelers and traffic managers. For the traveling public, the AZTech™ program delivers traffic coordination, traffic information and incident management from a regional perspective. Methods include motorist message signs, coordinated traffic signals, travel time information via phone and website, and incident and congestion information relayed through television and radio. For the professional traffic manager, AZTech™ has been able to integrate the many individual local and state government management systems into a regional system of traffic monitoring and control. Project specific decisions are made during roadway improvement design.

4. STREET CLASSIFICATION ATLAS

This section includes the functional classification maps that designate the future classification for the Arizona Parkways, arterial roadways, and collector roadways portion of the 2,478 miles of roads that

4. Street Classification Atlas

Page 6 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

are in the Maricopa County Road Inventory System. The following are assumptions and guidelines that were utilized in coding these maps. Please note that no distinction is made between rural and urban classifications.

Primary Purpose The primary purpose of the MSRP is to identify future roadway classifications for county roads. Identification of roadway classifications for roadways within cities or towns is included for the purpose of showing continuity with county roadways. Generally the classification for the county roadway is matched to the adjacent city or town roadway. A primary objective is to facilitate right-of-way preservation for future roadways. However, assignment of a roadway to a particular functional classification is not a guarantee that roadway improvements will be constructed in the future.

Municipal Functional Classification ResourcesA roadway’s classification is identified as shown on the most recently updated and adopted/accepted planning document. In many cases this is a municipality’s general plan. In other cases, it might constitute a regional transportation framework study.

The municipal functional classification documents referenced include:

• City of Avondale General Plan Update (2002)• Town of Buckeye Transportation Master Plan

(Draft, 2010)• Town of Carefree General Plan (2002)• Town of Cave Creek General Plan (2005)• City of Chandler Transportation Master Plan

Update (2010)• City of El Mirage – staff designation (2010)

• Town of Fountain Hills General Plan (2010)• Town of Gila Bend General Plan Update (2006)• Town of Gilbert General Plan (2010)• City of Glendale Transportation Plan (2009)• City of Goodyear General Plan (2010)• City of Litchfield Park General Plan Update

(2010)• City of Mesa Transportation Plan (2002)• Town of Paradise Valley General Plan (2003)• City of Peoria General Plan (2010)• City of Phoenix Street Classification Map (2010)• Town of Queen Creek General Plan Update

(2008)• City of Scottsdale Street Classification Map

(2008)• City of Surprise General Plan (2010)• City of Tempe General Plan (2003)• City of Tolleson General Plan (2005)• Town of Youngtown General Plan (2003)

Municipal functional classification designations, as they relate to the county’s categorization, are summarized in Table 2.

The Town of Guadalupe is not included in this list because it does not have a functional classification map. The arterials within Guadalupe are included in the City of Tempe’s General Plan.

The Town of Wickenburg is not included in this list because its 2003 General Plan illustrates only existing and future roadways, not roadway classifications. The MAG Hassayampa Valley Framework Study for the Wickenburg Area (November 2010) is used instead, as cited in Table 2 and confirmed by municipal staff.

The City of El Mirage is included in the list, but not in the table, as no functional classification map yet exists for the city; however, city staff clarified intended classification categories for the purpose of this publication.

4. Street Classification Atlas

Page 7 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

4. Street Classification Atlas

Table 2. County/Municipal Functional Classification System Comparison

JurisdictionMCDOT Functional Classification Categories

Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector

Avondale Arterial; RRS Major Collector N/A N/A

Buckeye Arterial N/A N/A N/A

Carefree Arterial N/A Collector Minor Collector

Cave Creek Principal Arterial N/A Major Collector Minor Collector

Chandler Major Arterial Minor Arterial N/A N/A

Fountain Hills Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Major Collector Limited Collector; Minor Collector

Gila Bend Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Collector N/A

Gilbert Major Arterial; RRS Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector

Glendale Major Arterial; Superstreet

Arterial Collector N/A

Goodyear Scenic Arterial; Major Arterial; Arterial

City Center Arterial N/A N/A

Litchfield Park Arterial N/A Collector N/A

Mesa Arterial (6 lanes); Parkway

Arterial (4 lanes) N/A N/A

Paradise Valley Major Arterial N/A Minor Arterial Collector

Peoria Principal Arterial; Major Arterial

Minor Arterial Major Collector Collector

Phoenix Major Arterial Arterial Collector Minor Collector

Queen Creek Principal Arterial Arterial Collector N/A

Scottsdale Major Arterial Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector

Surprise Major Arterial Minor Arterial N/A N/A

Tempe Arterial N/A N/A N/A

Tolleson Major Street N/A N/A N/A

Youngtown Arterial; RRS N/A Major Collector N/A

Page 8 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

4. Street Classification Atlas

Municipal functional classifications are assigned according to the best match of the county’s functional classification system. For example, if a municipality classifies a minor arterial as a six-lane roadway with 130 feet of right-of-way, it is depicted as a principal arterial roadway, as it best matches this classification within the county’s system. However, if a municipality classifies a minor arterial as having 80 feet of right-of-way and only two lanes, it would most closely match the county’s major collector category.

Framework StudiesThe framework studies referenced include:

• MAG I-10/Hassayampa Valley Transportation Framework Study (September 2007)

• MAG I-8 and I-10/Hidden Valley Transportation Framework Study (October 2009)

• ADOT Statewide Transportation Planning Framework Study (March 2010)

• MAG Hassayampa Valley Framework Study - Wickenburg Area (November 2010)

MCDOT Corridor StudiesThe MSRP incorporates the recommended roadway alignments identified in Corridor Feasibility Studies and Corridor Improvement Studies conducted by MCDOT. A summary of these studies can be found on the MCDOT website (http://www.mcdot.maricopa.gov).

Roadway NamesRoadway names are identified as shown on municipal general plans, transportation master plans, and/or regional transportation framework studies.

Functional Classification DistinctionsMany local jurisdictions do not distinguish between major and minor arterials or between major and minor collectors in their transportation plans. These include:

• City of Avondale• Town of Buckeye• Town of Carefree• Town of Cave Creek• City of El Mirage• City of Glendale• City of Litchfield Park• City of Peoria• City of Tempe• City of Tolleson• Town of Youngtown

In order to preserve the maximum required right-of-way, roadways in these jurisdictions are classified as major arterials and major collectors.

It should also be noted that many local jurisdictions do not distinguish between current and future roadways in their transportation plans, as the plan is a snapshot of the intended roadway network. Thus, roadways illustrated as future in the street classification maps are: (1) specifically classified as “future” in the municipal transportation plan or framework study, (2) illustrated in a transportation plan, but non-existent in the Streetnet file (comprehensive county roadway network compilation updated on a weekly basis), thus implying that they do not exist today, or (3) classified as future in the county RoadRunner file (inventory of roadways and their classifications in non-incorporated areas).

Page 9 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

Major and Minor Collectors All collectors in the unincorporated areas are shown. However, only collectors in incorporated areas that complete the grid on the periphery of cities and towns or provide connectivity between major and minor arterials are shown.

Municipal Planning Areas (MPA)Roadways planned in unincorporated areas as part of a town or city MPA are classified according to the municipal network functional categorization, as opposed to the county’s, as the roadway will likely ultimately be built and maintained by the town or city jurisdiction.

Shared RoadwaysSimilarly, when a roadway is shared by a city or town and the county (north-south or east-west side divisions), ownership is categorized as a county roadway, however classified according to the town or city’s functional classification plan.

High Capacity RoadwaysMaricopa County does not own or operate any freeways or expressways. High capacity and access controlled roadways (metropolitan state routes/freeways) are depicted separate from the local roadway system to provide regional context. They are categorized in three ways: Existing; Planned (e.g., adopted alignment, funding available for some degree of improvement over existing conditions); or Proposed (e.g., accepted corridor, no funding for improvements, preliminary design only). U.S. highways and state routes that are limited access and/or rural in nature are depicted as “Highways.” U.S. highways and state routes that traverse incorporated areas and function as part of the local roadway network (e.g., principal arterial) are classified according to each jurisdiction’s functional classification plan.

Indian Community RoadwaysRoadway corridors within an Indian Community are illustrated as “other” to provide regional connectivity context. Those roadways that are maintained by the county, however, due to their regional significance, are classified per the RoadRunner file.

Adjacent CountiesRoadways in adjacent counties are simply depicted with a solid line representing existing, and dashed line for future; however, no functional classification designations are assigned. Roadway network information for adjacent counties was pulled from a variety of sources, including:

• ADOT Statewide Transportation Planning Framework Study (March 2010), which includes principal arterial and higher network information statewide

• MAG Hassayampa Valley Framework Study for the Wickenburg Area (November 2010), which includes some network information for Yavapai County

• La Paz County Comprehensive Plan (2010)• Yuma County Comprehensive Plan (2010)• Pima County 2040 Regional Transportation Plan

(2010)• Pinal County Comprehensive Plan (2009)• Yavapai County Road Centerlines and Routes GIS

shapefile (2010)• MAG I-8 and I-10/Hidden Valley Transportation

Framework Study (October 2009), which includes the Pinal County Regionally Significant Routes for Safety and Mobility network

• Yavapai County Comprehensive Plan (2003)

4. Street Classification Atlas

Page 10 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

Figure 1. Parkway Cross-Section

Figure 2. Urban Principal Arterial Cross-Section

Figure 3. Rural Principal Arterial Cross-Section

Roadway Cross-Sections

Page 11 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

Figure 4. Urban Minor Arterial Cross-Section

Figure 5. Rural Minor Arterial Cross-Section

Figure 6. Urban Major Collector Cross-Section

Roadway Cross-Sections

Page 12 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

Figure 7. Rural Major Collector Cross-Section

Figure 8. Urban Minor Collector Cross-Section

Figure 9. Rural Minor Collector Cross-Section

Roadway Cross-Sections

Page 13 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan Map Index

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

Page 14 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

Maricopa County Major Streets and Routes Plan Municipalities Index

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

Wickenburg

Buckeye

Gila Bend

Surprise

Goodyear

Avondale

TollesonLitchfield

Park

Glendale

Phoenix

ParadiseValley

Scottsdale

FountainHills

Peoria

Tempe Mesa

Chandler

Gilbert

QueenCreek

Guadalupe

CaveCreek Carefree

Youngtown

El Mirage

Page 15 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

Eagl

e Ey

e Rd

Aguila Rd

Blac

k M

ount

ain

Pkw

y

BNSF Railway

Eagl

e Ey

e Pa

rkw

ay

W. Wickenburg Way

W. Caballeros Rd

Cherokee Ln

Fore

paug

h Pe

ak R

d

YAVAPAI COUNTY

MARICOPA COUNTY

LA P

AZ

COU

NTY

Twin

Pea

ks R

dHarquahala Mountains

Wilderness Area

Tres AlamosWilderness Area

Mar

icop

a Co

unty

Maj

or S

tree

ts a

nd R

oute

s Pl

anM

ap 1

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.

MCDOT Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Parkway

Principal Arterial

Minor Arterial

Municipal Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Parkway

Other Roadway

Canal

Railroad

Park Area

High Capacity Roadway

Planned Freeway

Freeway

Highway

Proposed Freeway

Page 16 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

Mar

icop

a Co

unty

Maj

or S

tree

ts a

nd R

oute

s Pl

anM

ap 2

Blac

k M

ount

ain

Pkw

y

211t

h Av

e

Wild

Ros

ePk

wy

Hid

den

Wat

ers

Pkw

y

Vultu

re M

ine

Rd

Castle Hot S

prings R

d

Vultu

re M

ine

Rd

BNSF Railway

Black Mountain Rd

BNSF Railway

Twin

Pea

ks R

d

Turn

er P

kwy

Cherokee Ln

W. Caballeros Rd

W. Wickenburg Way

Joy Ranch Pkwy

Has

saya

mpa

Frw

y

SR 74 ExtensionLake Pleasant Frwy

YAVAPAI COUNTYMARICOPA COUNTY

ConstellationPark

Hassayampa RiverCanyon Wilderness

Area

NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.

MCDOT Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Parkway

Principal Arterial

Minor Arterial

Municipal Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Parkway

Other Roadway

Canal

Railroad

Park Area

High Capacity Roadway

Planned Freeway

Freeway

Highway

Proposed Freeway

Page 17 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

211t

h Av

e

Jack

rabb

it Tr

163r

d Av

e Cloud Rd

Joy Ranch Rd

Desert Hills Dr

Honda Bow Rd

New

Riv

er R

d

Carefree Hwy

Jenny Lin Rd

Anthem Way

Lake Pleasant Frwy

MARICOPA COUNTY

YAVAPAI COUNTY

Cast

le H

ot S

prin

gs R

d

Prescott National Forest

Lake PleasantRegional Park

Hell's CanyonWilderness Area

Mar

icop

a Co

unty

Maj

or S

tree

ts a

nd R

oute

s Pl

anM

ap 3

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.

MCDOT Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Parkway

Principal Arterial

Minor Arterial

Municipal Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Parkway

Other Roadway

Canal

Railroad

Park Area

High Capacity Roadway

Planned Freeway

Freeway

Highway

Proposed Freeway

Page 18 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

Mar

icop

a Co

unty

Maj

or S

tree

ts a

nd R

oute

s Pl

anM

ap 4

Scho

ol H

ouse

Rd

Cave

Cre

ek R

d

32nd

St

24th

St

16th

St

7th

St

7th

Ave

Pim

a Rd

Tom

Dar

lingt

on D

r

136t

h St

Desert Hills Dr

Honda Bow Rd

Joy Ranch Rd

Bartlett Dam Rd

Seve

n Sp

rings

Rd

MARICOPA COUNTY

YAVAPAI COUNTY

GILA COUNTY

YAVAPAI COUNTY

Circle Mountain Rd

New River Rd

Tonto National Forest

Cave CreekRegional

Park

NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.

MCDOT Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Parkway

Principal Arterial

Minor Arterial

Municipal Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Parkway

Other Roadway

Canal

Railroad

Park Area

High Capacity Roadway

Planned Freeway

Freeway

Highway

Proposed Freeway

Page 19 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

Mar

icop

a Co

unty

Maj

or S

tree

ts a

nd R

oute

s Pl

anM

ap 5

Bartlett Dam Rd

MARICOPA COUNTY

YAVAPAI COUNTY

YAVAPAI COUNTY

GILA COUNTY

MARICOPA CO

U

NTY

GILA COU

NTY

Tonto National Forest

NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.

MCDOT Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Parkway

Principal Arterial

Minor Arterial

Municipal Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Parkway

Other Roadway

Canal

Railroad

Park Area

High Capacity Roadway

Planned Freeway

Freeway

Highway

Proposed Freeway

Page 20 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

Mar

icop

a Co

unty

Maj

or S

tree

ts a

nd R

oute

s Pl

anM

ap 6

Camelback Pkwy

Glendale Ave

Northern Pkwy

Baseline Rd

Southern Ave

Broadway Rd

Lower Buckeye Rd

Yuma Rd

Van Buren St

McDowell Rd

Thomas Rd

Indian School Rd

Eagl

e Ey

e Rd

Salome Hwy

Aguila Rd

483r

d Av

e

491s

t Ave

499t

h Av

e

507t

h Av

e

Har

quah

ala

Valle

y Rd

523r

d Av

e

531s

t Ave

539t

h Av

e

547t

h Av

e

Olive AveCAP Canal

MAR

ICO

PA C

OU

NTY

LA P

AZ

COU

NTY

Centennial Rd Courthouse Rd

Buckeye Rd

Dove Valley Rd

Tonopah Pkwy

Eagletail MountainsWilderness Area

Big Horn MountainsWilderness Area

Hummingbird SpringsWilderness Area

NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.

MCDOT Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Parkway

Principal Arterial

Minor Arterial

Municipal Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Parkway

Other Roadway

Canal

Railroad

Park Area

High Capacity Roadway

Planned Freeway

Freeway

Highway

Proposed Freeway

Page 21 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

Mar

icop

a Co

unty

Maj

or S

tree

ts a

nd R

oute

s Pl

anM

ap 7

Rain

bow

Rd

Wat

son

Rd

Apac

he R

d

Mill

er R

d

Rook

s Rd

Turn

er R

d

Wils

on R

d

Palo

Ver

de R

d

Brun

er R

d

John

son

Rd

Win

ters

burg

Rd

387t

h Av

e

395t

h Av

e

315t

h Av

e

323r

d Av

e

331s

t Ave

339t

h Av

e

347t

h Av

e

355t

h Av

e

363r

d Av

e

371s

t Ave

Tono

pah

Rd

411t

h Av

e

Camelback Pkwy

Bethany Home Rd

Glendale Ave

Northern Pkwy

Olive Ave

Peoria Ave

Cactus Rd

Greenway Rd

Bell Rd

Sun Valley Pkwy

MC-85

Southern Ave

Broadway Rd

Lower Buckeye Rd

Yuma Rd

Van Buren St

McDowell Rd

Thomas Rd

Indian School Rd

Deer Valley Rd

Pinnacle Peak Rd

Jomax Rd

Patton Rd

Dixileta Dr

Lone Mountain Rd

Dove Valley Rd

Wintersburg Pkwy

Turn

er P

kwy

Hid

den

Wat

ers

Pkw

y

Tono

pah

Pkw

y

Vultu

re M

ine

Rd

Wic

kenb

urg

Rd

BNSF Railway

CAP Canal

Sun

Valle

y Pk

wy

Wild

Ros

e Pk

wy

RID Canal

Has

saya

mpa

Frw

y

White Tanks Frwy

Has

saya

mpa

Frw

y

White Tank MountainRegional Park

NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.

MCDOT Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Parkway

Principal Arterial

Minor Arterial

Municipal Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Parkway

Other Roadway

Canal

Railroad

Park Area

High Capacity Roadway

Planned Freeway

Freeway

Highway

Proposed Freeway

Page 22 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

Mar

icop

a Co

unty

Maj

or S

tree

ts a

nd R

oute

s Pl

anM

ap 8

Camelback Rd

Bethany Home Rd

Glendale Ave

Northern Ave

Dunlap/Olive Ave

Peoria Ave

Cactus Rd

Thunderbird/Waddell Rd

Greenway Rd

Bell Rd

Union Hills Dr

Beardsley Rd

Baseline Rd

Southern Ave

Broadway Rd

Lower Buckeye Rd

Yuma/Buckeye Rd

Van Buren St

McDowell Rd

Thomas Rd

Indian School Rd

Deer Valley Rd

Pinnacle Peak Rd

Happy Valley Rd

Jomax Rd

99th

Ave

107t

h Av

e

Avon

dale

Blv

d

El M

irage

Rd

Dys

art R

d

Litc

hfie

ld R

d

Bulla

rd A

ve

Estr

ella

Pkw

y/Re

ems

Rd

Sariv

al R

d

Cott

on L

n

Citr

us R

d

Perr

yvill

e Rd

27th

Ave

35th

Ave

43rd

Ave

51st

Ave

59th

Ave

67th

Ave

75th

Ave

83rd

Ave

91st

Ave

Jack

rabb

it Tr

Airp

ort R

d

Dea

n Rd

Patton Rd

Dixileta Dr

Lone Mountain Rd

Dove Valley Rd

Lake

Ple

asan

t Pkw

y

Union Pacific Railroad

BNSF Railway

Bear

dsle

y Ca

nal

CAP Canal

RID Canal

Grand Canal

Arizona Canal

30

WhiteTank

MountainRegional

Park

Adobe DamRegional

Park

NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.

MCDOT Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Parkway

Principal Arterial

Minor Arterial

Municipal Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Parkway

Other Roadway

Canal

Railroad

Park Area

High Capacity Roadway

Planned Freeway

Freeway

Highway

Proposed Freeway

Page 23 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

Mar

icop

a Co

unty

Maj

or S

tree

ts a

nd R

oute

s Pl

anM

ap 9

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

Camelback Rd

Bethany Home Rd

Glendale Ave

Northern Ave

Dunlap/Olive Ave

Peoria Ave

Cactus Rd

Thunderbird/Waddell Rd

Greenway Rd

Bell Rd

Union Hills Dr

Beardsley Rd

Baseline Rd

Southern Ave

Broadway Rd

University Dr

Brown Rd

McKellips Rd

McDowell Rd

Thomas Rd

Indian School Rd

Deer Valley Rd

Pinnacle Peak Rd

Happy Valley Rd

Jomax Rd

Dob

son

Rd

Pric

e Rd

McC

linto

ck D

r

Rura

l Rd

Kyre

ne R

d

Prie

st D

r

48th

St

40th

St

32nd

St

24th

St

16th

St

7th

St

Hig

ley

Rd

Gre

enfie

ld R

d

Val V

ista

Dr

Lind

say

Rd

Gilb

ert R

d

Stap

ley

Rd

Mes

a D

r

Coun

try

Club

Dr

Alm

a Sc

hool

Rd

7th

Ave

19th

Ave

Dynamite Blvd

Dixileta Dr

Lone Mountain Rd

Sonoran Blvd

Cave

Cre

ek R

d

27th

Ave

Rio Verde Dr

McD

owel

l Mou

ntai

n Rd

56th

St

Tatu

m B

lvd

104t

h St

96th

St

Pim

a Rd

Hay

den

Rd

Scot

tsda

le R

d

64th

St

CAP Canal

Arizona Canal

Union Pacific Railroad

Carefree Hwy

Cloud Rd Stagecoach Pass

Mus

tang

Way

Blac

k M

ount

ain

Blvd

McDowell Rd

Thomas Rd

Shea Blvd

144t

h St

136t

h St

168t

h St

160t

h St

152n

d St

176t

h St

McDowell MountainRegional Park

Tonto National Forest

PhoenixMountainsPreserve

PapagoPark

TontoN.F.

NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.

MCDOT Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Parkway

Principal Arterial

Minor Arterial

Municipal Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Parkway

Other Roadway

Canal

Railroad

Park Area

High Capacity Roadway

Planned Freeway

Freeway

Highway

Proposed Freeway

Page 24 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

Mar

icop

a Co

unty

Maj

or S

tree

ts a

nd R

oute

s Pl

anM

ap 1

0

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

Baseline Rd

Southern Ave

Broadway Rd

University Dr

Brown Rd

McKellips

McDowell Rd

Thomas Rd

Haw

es R

d

Mou

ntai

n V

iew

Rd

Gol

dfie

ld R

d

Tom

ahaw

k Rd

Idah

o Rd

Ironw

ood

Dr

Mer

idia

n Rd

Sign

al B

utte

Rd

Cris

mon

Rd

Ells

wor

th R

d

Bush Hwy

Use

ry P

ass

Rd

Rio Verde Dr

McD

owel

l Mou

ntai

n Rd

Mus

tang

Way

BIA

51

For t M

cDo

wel

l Rd

MARICOPA COUNTY

PINAL COUNTY

GILA COUNTY

MARICOPA COUNTY

Tonto National Forest

NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.

MCDOT Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Parkway

Principal Arterial

Minor Arterial

Municipal Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Parkway

Other Roadway

Canal

Railroad

Park Area

High Capacity Roadway

Planned Freeway

Freeway

Highway

Proposed Freeway

Page 25 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

Mar

icop

a Co

unty

Maj

or S

tree

ts a

nd R

oute

s Pl

anM

ap 1

1

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

MARICOPA COUNTY

PINAL COUNTY

GILA COU

NTY

Tonto National Forest

NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.

MCDOT Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Parkway

Principal Arterial

Minor Arterial

Municipal Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Parkway

Other Roadway

Canal

Railroad

Park Area

High Capacity Roadway

Planned Freeway

Freeway

Highway

Proposed Freeway

Page 26 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

Mar

icop

a Co

unty

Maj

or S

tree

ts a

nd R

oute

s Pl

anM

ap 1

2

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

Tono

pah

Rd

411t

h Av

e

477t

h Av

e

491s

t Ave

507t

h Av

e

Har

quah

ala

Valle

y Rd

523r

d Av

e

531s

t Ave

539t

h Av

e

547t

h Av

e

Narramore Rd

Elliot Rd

Dobbins Rd

Willams Field Rd

Lahman Rd

Highline Rd

Rhodes Ave

Butterfield Stage Rd

571s

t Ave

Hyder Rd

Union Pacific

Railroad

Oat

man

Rd

Painted Rock Dam

Rd

MAR

ICO

PA C

OU

NTY

YUM

A C

OU

NTY

Ray Rd

Eagletail MountainsWilderness Area

Signal MountainWilderness Area

Woolsey PeakWilderness Area

NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.

MCDOT Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Parkway

Principal Arterial

Minor Arterial

Municipal Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Parkway

Other Roadway

Canal

Railroad

Park Area

High Capacity Roadway

Planned Freeway

Freeway

Highway

Proposed Freeway

Page 27 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

Mar

icop

a Co

unty

Maj

or S

tree

ts a

nd R

oute

s Pl

anM

ap 1

3

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

Germann Rd

Williams Field Rd

Ray Rd

Narramore Rd

Elliot Rd

Hazen Rd

Riggs Rd

Patterson Rd

Pecos Rd

Woods Rd

Pierpoint Rd

Fornes Rd

Watermelon Rd

Powerline Rd

Maricopa Rd

Rain

bow

Rd

Wat

son

Rd

Apac

he R

d

Mill

er R

d

Rook

s Rd

Turn

er R

d

Wils

on R

d

Palo

Ver

de R

d

Brun

er R

d

John

son

Rd

Win

ters

burg

Rd

331s

t Ave

351s

t Ave

355t

h Av

e

Tono

pah

Rd

411t

h Av

e

Citr

us V

alle

y Rd

Gila

Blv

d

Stou

t Rd

Palo

ma

RdUnion Pacific Railroad

Union Pacific Railroad

Arlington Canal

Enterprise Canal

Gila Bend Canal

Old US 80

Hid

den

Wat

ers

Pkw

y

30

Woolsey PeakWilderness Area

BuckeyeHills

RegionalPark

Sonoran DesertNational

Monument

North Maricopa MountainsWilderness Area

NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.

MCDOT Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Parkway

Principal Arterial

Minor Arterial

Municipal Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Parkway

Other Roadway

Canal

Railroad

Park Area

High Capacity Roadway

Planned Freeway

Freeway

Highway

Proposed Freeway

Page 28 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

Mar

icop

a Co

unty

Maj

or S

tree

ts a

nd R

oute

s Pl

anM

ap 1

4

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

Pecos Rd

Williams Field Rd

Ray Rd

Narramore Rd

Elliot Rd

Dobbins Rd

Sonoran Valley Pkwy

Schumacher Rd

Farrell Rd

Mahalia Rd

Kinney Rd

Amaranth Blvd

99th

Ave

107t

h Av

e

115t

h Av

e

123r

d Av

e

Dys

art R

d

Litc

hfie

ld R

d

Bulla

rd A

ve

Pebb

le C

reek

Pkw

y/Es

trel

la P

kwy

Sariv

al R

d

Estr

ella

Pkw

y/Co

tton

Ln

Citr

us R

d/Ra

inbo

w V

alle

y Rd

Perr

yvill

e Rd

51st

Ave

59th

Ave

67th

Ave

75th

Ave

83rd

Ave

91st

Ave

Jack

rabb

it Tr

Airp

ort R

d

27th

Ave

35th

Ave

43rd

Ave

99th

Ave

107t

h Av

e

115t

h Av

e

75th

Ave

83rd

Ave

91st

AveUnion Pacific

Railroad

Hassayampa Frwy

Hassayampa Frwy

MAR

ICO

PA C

OU

NTY

PIN

AL C

OU

NTY

de Anza Scenic Way

Queen Creek Rd

Germann Rd

Hunt Rd

Riggs Rd

Ocotillo Rd

Chandler Heights Rd

Patterson Rd

North MaricopaMountains

Wilderness Area

South MaricopaMountains

Wilderness Area

Sonoran DesertNational Monument

Estrella MountainRegional Park

SierraEstrella

WildernessArea

NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.

MCDOT Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Parkway

Principal Arterial

Minor Arterial

Municipal Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Parkway

Other Roadway

Canal

Railroad

Park Area

High Capacity Roadway

Planned Freeway

Freeway

Highway

Proposed Freeway

Page 29 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

Mar

icop

a Co

unty

Maj

or S

tree

ts a

nd R

oute

s Pl

anM

ap 1

5

Queen Creek Rd

Germann Rd

Pecos Rd

Williams Field Rd

Ray Rd

Warner Rd

Elliot Rd

Guadalupe Rd

Hunt Hwy

Riggs Rd

Ocotillo Rd

Sesame Rd

Chandler Heights Rd

Casa Blanca Rd

Nelson Rd

Hor

sesh

oe R

d

Mur

phy

Rd

Dob

son

Rd

Pric

e Rd

McC

linto

ck D

r

Rura

l Rd

Kyre

ne R

d

Prie

st D

r

48th

St

40th

St

32nd

St

24th

St

16th

St

7th

St

Hig

ley

Rd

Gre

enfie

ld R

d

Val V

ista

Dr

Lind

say

Rd

Gilb

ert R

d

Coop

er R

d

McQ

ueen

Rd

7th

Ave

19th

Ave

Alm

a Sc

hool

Rd

Cons

olid

ated

Can

al

East

ern

Cana

l

RWCD

Can

al

Union Pacific Railroad

Hassayampa Frwy

Tem

pe C

analKy

rene

Can

al

Union Pacific Railroad

Hig

hlin

e Ca

nal

MARICOPA COUNTY

PINAL COUNTY

Phoenix South Mountain Park

Hohokam PimaNational Monument

NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.

MCDOT Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Parkway

Principal Arterial

Minor Arterial

Municipal Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Parkway

Other Roadway

Canal

Railroad

Park Area

High Capacity Roadway

Planned Freeway

Freeway

Highway

Proposed Freeway

Page 30 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

Mar

icop

a Co

unty

Maj

or S

tree

ts a

nd R

oute

s Pl

anM

ap 1

6

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

Queen Creek Rd

Germann Rd

Pecos Rd

Williams Field Rd

Ray Rd

Warner Rd

Elliot Rd

Guadalupe Rd

Hunt Hwy

Riggs Rd

Chandler Heights Rd

Ocotillo Rd

Skyline Dr

Hunt Hwy

Florence Kelvin Hwy

Schn

epf R

d

Gol

dfie

ld R

d

Tom

ahaw

k Rd

Idah

o Rd

Vine

yard

Rd

Ironw

ood

Dr

Mer

idia

n Rd

Sign

al B

utte

Rd

Cris

mon

Rd

Ells

wor

th R

d

Rittenhouse Rd

Union Pacific Railroad

Magma Arizona Railro

ad

Union Pacific Railroad

Uni

on P

acifi

c Ra

ilroa

d

Williams Gateway Frwy

Nor

th-S

outh

Frw

y

802

MARICOPA COUNTY

PINAL COUNTY

TontoN.F.

NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.

MCDOT Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Parkway

Principal Arterial

Minor Arterial

Municipal Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Parkway

Other Roadway

Canal

Railroad

Park Area

High Capacity Roadway

Planned Freeway

Freeway

Highway

Proposed Freeway

Page 31 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

Mar

icop

a Co

unty

Maj

or S

tree

ts a

nd R

oute

s Pl

anM

ap 1

7

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

Agua Caliente Rd

Oat

man

Rd

Painted RockD

am Rd

Union Pacific Railroad

Gila Bend Canal

YUM

A C

OU

NTY

MAR

ICO

PA C

OU

NTY

MARICOPA COUNTY

PIMA COUNTY

NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.

MCDOT Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Parkway

Principal Arterial

Minor Arterial

Municipal Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Parkway

Other Roadway

Canal

Railroad

Park Area

High Capacity Roadway

Planned Freeway

Freeway

Highway

Proposed Freeway

Page 32 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

Mar

icop

a Co

unty

Maj

or S

tree

ts a

nd R

oute

s Pl

anM

ap 1

8

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

Pota

toe

Rd

Palo

ma

Rd

Citr

us V

alle

y Rd

Tucs

on, C

orne

lia, a

nd G

ila B

end

Railr

oad

Gila Bend Canal

Union Pacific Railroad

MARICOPA COUNTYPIMA COUNTY

Sonoran DesertNational Monument

NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.

MCDOT Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Parkway

Principal Arterial

Minor Arterial

Municipal Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Parkway

Other Roadway

Canal

Railroad

Park Area

High Capacity Roadway

Planned Freeway

Freeway

Highway

Proposed Freeway

Page 33 MCDOT Major Streets and Routes Plan

Mar

icop

a Co

unty

Maj

or S

tree

ts a

nd R

oute

s Pl

anM

ap 1

9

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19

Vekol Valley Rd

MAR

ICO

PA C

OU

NTY

PIN

AL C

OU

NTY

MARICOPA COUNTY

PIMA COUNTY

Sonoran DesertNational Monument

South Maricopa MountainsWilderness Area

Table TopWilderness Area

NOTES: (1) Dashed roadways represent future corridors, identified in a municipal general or transportation plan, or regional framework study. (2) MCDOT classification matches right-of-way width of adjoining municipal streets. Classification may differ because right-of-way widths vary between municipalities.

MCDOT Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Parkway

Principal Arterial

Minor Arterial

Municipal Classification

Major Collector

Minor Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Parkway

Other Roadway

Canal

Railroad

Park Area

High Capacity Roadway

Planned Freeway

Freeway

Highway

Proposed Freeway