marija pejcinovic buric, institutional framework and coordination, croatia case study, ankara 24 may...

29
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Transposition of EU Legislation into the Legal System of Turkey Institutional Framework and Coordination – challenges, experiences: case study - Croatia Marija Pejčinović Burić, Croatia Ankara, 24th and 25th May 2016

Category:

Government & Nonprofit


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

© OECD

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

Transposition of EU Legislation into the Legal System of Turkey

Institutional Framework and Coordination – challenges, experiences: case study - Croatia

Marija Pejčinović Burić, Croatia

Ankara, 24th and 25th May 2016

Page 2: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

Content

• The roles of different institutions • Co-ordination of EU Affairs/Harmonisation• NPAA or NPAEU or National Action Plan for EU Accession

(NPEUA) – the strategic document that evolves over the time A tool for co-ordination of harmonisation and over time

overall accession preparations linked with negotiations A tool for monitoring and stearing of the EU related

affairs

2

Page 3: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

The Role of Different Institutions in the Harmonisation Process

• The Government The coordinator – MEI/MFEA The line ministries The Ministry of Finance The Office for Legislation

• The Parliament The European Integration Committee Other related committeesOther Stakeholders

3

Page 4: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

The Co-ordination Body: MEI

• Co-ordination of all activities related to EU Integration Phase I

• Implementation of the SAA• Harmonisation• Translation• Pre-accesion funds management• Training• Communication/Information

4

Page 5: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

The co-ordination body: MFEA

• Co-ordination of all activities related to EU Integration Phase II

• Negotiations• Implementation of the SAA• Harmonisation• Translation• Training• Communication/Information

5

Page 6: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

Roles of other Gvt. Institutions in Legal Harmonisation Process

• The line ministries Checking for financial impact of the draft legal acts (all

line institutions are obliged to draft a Financial Impact Assessment of the legal act – in a format of the Standardised FIA form, from 2005)

EU co-ordinators (reporting/co-ordination) Sector specific civil servants (drafting legislation and

preparing other relevant documents, such as FIA /Financial Impact Assessment/, and later, after 2011, RIA /Regulatory Impact Assessment/etc.)

Legal departments (checking draft legislation, co-drafting legislation)

6

Page 7: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

Roles of other Gvt. Institutions in Legal Harmonisation Process (cont.)

• The Ministry of Finance Checking for Finacial Impact Assessment (FIA)

• The Office for Legislation Checking constitutionality of the draft legislation, cross-

checking with other related national legislation in force

7

Page 8: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

The Role the Parliament in Legal Harmonisation Process

• The Parliament The European Integration CommitteeLegal proposals that are harmonized with the EU acquis, labeled with “P.Z.E.” marking are discussed and voted at the EI Committee

Other related committeesLegal proposals that are harmonized with the EU acquis are also discussed and voted by the respective parliamentary Committee not only for issues related to harmonisation.

8

Page 9: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

Rules of procedure of the Croatian Parliament

Article 136. – a distinction has been made between draft law harmonizing with the EU acquis and other “national” legal proposals

Legal proposals that harmonize with the EU acquis are labeled with a special “P.Z.E.” marking

Article 161. – provides for urgent adoption procedure in case of laws harmonizing with the EU acquis, if so demanded by the proponent of the law

Page 10: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

The National Program for Accession to the EU: case Croatia

• The main strategic document of the Government of Croatia for approximation with the EU acquis and meeting the EU membership criteria

• An annual comprehensive document – adopted by the Government

• The Parliament – document presented by the Government and Legislative activity plan adopted

Page 11: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

The Croatian NPAEU and Accession Negotiations

• Dual purpose: towards EU – harmonization of legislation, meeting the

SAA obligations + obligations taken on during negotiations (screening; documents for meeting benchmarks; negotiation positions)

strategic planning of all activities and measures on a national level; involvement of all public administration bodies; networking; consistency; effective monitoring of implementation of adopted obligations at the Government level

11

Page 12: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

Annex A – Acquis implementation

Political criteria

NPAEU

Economic criteria

Legal criteria Admin capacity

Annex B – Budgetary expenditure

NPPAA STRUCTUREN

PAEU

Page 13: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

NPAEU Drafting– legislative part

Legal criteria: ability to take on the EU membership obligations: - Accomplished during the previous year – short overview

of the achievements - Key priorities (short-term and mid-term priorities in earlier stages) - legislative activities + implementation measures - Annex A – table overview

13

Page 14: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

NPAEU Drafting Instructions

•All legal measures and by-laws whose adoption Croatia has announced for 2007, during bilateral screening or in negotiation positions, or the ones that refer to negotiation opening benchmarks must be cited and elaborated on in detail in the NPAEU.

14

Page 15: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

NPAEU Drafting Instructions

• National program (NPAEU) must fully reflect the course of the negotiation process at all its stages.•There can be no deviations or differences between the negotiation process and obligations taken, and the NPAEU, as the National program ensures and maintains the course of undertaken obligations during the negotiation process. •The same goes for all the implementing measures officially presented during the negotiation process (institutional, administrative, analytical…)

15

Page 16: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

Croatian National Programme

• Measures planned Laws By-laws Implementing measures (strategies, action plans,

establishment of new institutions, establishment of new departments within existing institutions, employment, education and trainings, new equipment/IT systems)

Relation with the implementation of a specific acquisThe deadlines set quarterly

16

Page 17: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

1 FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS

Redni broj Zakonodavna mjera Odgovorna

institucija EU acquis s kojim se mjera usklađuje Upućivanje uproceduru VRH

1. Zakon o tehničkim zahtjevima za proizvode i ocjeni sukladnosti MGRIP

Rezolucija Vijeća ministara od 7. svibnja 1985. g. o Novome pristupu tehničkom usklađivanju i normama 31985Y0604(01)

I. kvartal 2007.

LEGAL MEASURES

Redni broj Podzakonski akt Odgovorna

institucijaZakonska osnova za donošenje

podzakonskog akta EU acquis s kojim se mjera usklađuje Upućivanje uproceduru VRH

1.

Uredba o načinu i postupku službenog obavješćivanja i suradnje sa Svjetskom trgovinskom organizacijom i Europskom Unijom u području norma, tehničkih propisa i postupaka ocjene sukladnosti

MGRIP Zakon o tehničkim zahtjevima za proizvode i ocjeni sukladnosti

Direktiva 98/48/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 20. srpnja 1998. kojom se izmjenjuje i dopunjuje Direktiva 98/34/EZ koja utvrđuje postupak pribavljanja informacija na području tehničkih standarda i propisa 31998L0048

III. kvartal 2007.

b) Podzakonski akti

Opis mjere Faze procesa Odgovorna institucija Rok usvajanja / provedbe

STRATEGIJE

Strategija za cjelokupno područje slobodnog kretanja roba a) održati sastanke sa sektorima iz područja Slobode kretanja roba MGRIP

I. kvartal 2007.

b) dostaviti nacrt strategije nadležnim tijelima državne uprave na očitovanje MGRIP

II. kvartal 2007.(travanj 2007.)

c) dostaviti prijedlog nacrta strategije na očitovanje Europskoj komisiji MGRIP

II. kvartal 2007.(svibanj 2007.)

d) dostaviti strategiju Vladi RH na usvajanje MGRIP III. kvartal 2007.PLANOVI

Akcijski plan za usklađivanje s člancima 28.-30. Ugovora o EZ MGRIP III. kvartal 2007

PROVEDBENE MJERE

Page 18: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

Gradual Evolution of the National Programme for EU Integration

2003 13 priority areas + JHA

2004

2005

SAA Implementation PlanAll chapters (29), AVIS, European Partnership

2006

2007

2008

2009

33 chapters, Screening results, Progress Report, Accession Partnership,

Benchmarks, Negotiation results

Page 19: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

2010., 2011. i 2012. – Process Continues

• Program for adoption and implementation of the EU acquis

– new acquis – moving target

• Transitional period instrument and preparation for adoption of the EU acquis-a in the environment of full EU membership

Page 20: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

Monitoring Implementation of the NPAEU

Line ministries – responsible for the transposition of EU acquis in their competence

EU coordinators in the state administration bodies – responsible for EU portfolio within the framework of their institutions

EU departments – focal points for the communication with MFEA and other sectorial departments

20

Page 21: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

Monitoring the NPAEU implementation

EU coordination - all EU coordinators, Assistant Minister of Foreign and European Affairs is presiding Regular meetings

• Executive – regular working bodies of the Government and Government sessions

• MFEA – submits reports to the Government + detailed overview of upcoming activities; in the case of open issues – a special non –paper for discussion and decision making on the highest level drafted

21

Page 22: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

Monitoring Implementation of the NPAEU

First point of the Agenda of standing Government bodies, Government meetings, and narrow cabinet Weekly

European Integration Committee of the CP

22

Page 23: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

Monitoring Implementation of the NPAEU

23

for social affairs and

human rights

for economy and EU funds

for internal affairs

for foreign and european

affairs

for social affairs and

human rights

for economy and EU funds

for internal affairs

for foreign and european

affairs

Governmentsession

Expert working groups Coordinations

Mondays Tuesdays

Thursdays

Innercabinet

Page 24: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

Implementation of the NPAAEU

Implementation coordination by MFEAWeekly updates of statistics on made progress Responsibility of each line ministry and of other public administration bodies

OVERVIEW OF THE LEGAL PROPOSALS FOR ADOPTION OF THE EU ACQUIS IN 2011 – REPUBLIC OF CROATIA I. QUARTER

  LEGAL MEASURES GOVERNMENT STATUSTHE MINISTRY OF INTERIOR

11 The Law on amendments to the Law on witness protection 10.01.2011.  OJ 18/11

12 The Law on changes and amendments to the Law on Foreigners 21.03.2011. 

14.01.11. sent to EC 23.02. EC provided opinion

MINISTRY OF FINANCE

13 The Law on special tax on coffee 07.02.2011. 

07.02.2011. The Law passed on the Gvt session; sent to the Parliament

MINISTRY OF SEE, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE

14 The Law on changes and amendments of the Law on Maritime Code  31.03.2011.

MINISTRY OF SCIENCE, EDUCATION AND SPORT

15 The Law on changes and amendments to the Law on Regulated Professions and recognition of professional qualifications

 15.03.2011. 

16The Law on ratification of the Memorandum of Understanding between the RC and the EU on participation of RC in the programmes Youth in Action and the Action Programme in the field of Life Long Learning (2007.-2013.)

 15.02.2011. 27.01.11. The law passed on the Gvt. Session and sent to the Parliament

MINISTRY OF THE FAMILY, VETERANS AND INTER-GENERATIONAL SOLIDARITY

17 The Law on changes and amendments of the Law on Maternity and Familiy aid

31.01.2011. 

28.02. on the agenda of the standing Gvt. working bodies

Page 25: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

NPAEU and preparation and monitoring of negotiating documents

• NPAEU – strategic framework• Take into account measures planned in the NPAEU• Preparation of sectoral strategic documents – broader

aspect in relation to the NPAEU• Need to have coherence with other strategic

documents• Financial implications – budget and projections for

next period• Public Administration Recruitment plan

Page 26: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EUNPAEU and preparation and monitoring of

negotiating documents

NPAA - instrument for the monitoring of obligations steaming from the accession negotiations – requires flexibility

Inclusion of additional measures in the NPAEU during the year (monthly/every three months/right after upon the obligation is established)

Prolongation of deadlines – consultations with EU or other stakeholders

Negotiating team – active participation in the preparation of the reports on the NPAEU implementation for the Government

26

Page 27: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

NPAEU – Do’s and Dont’s

NPAEU must fully reflect the course of the accession negotiation process in all its stages

No discrepancies and differences between the obligations taken within accession negotiation process and NPAEU - NPAEU ensures and reflects the course of commitments taken during negotiating process

Laws and by-laws which represent opening benchmarks or which adoption is announced in the negotiating position must be included in the NPAEU

The same goes for all implementing measures officially presented in the course of the negotiating process (institutional, administrative, analytical…)

27

Page 28: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

NPAEU – Do’s and Dont’s

Avoid introduction of new reporting mechanisms

Avoid creation of parallel/double channels for the reporting and monitoring of the NPAA obligations and negotiating obligations

Use regular procedure for the adoption on the level of the Government and the Parliament

Choose the most efficient model

The same decision makers on national level

Ensure regular monitoring

28

Page 29: Marija Pejcinovic Buric, Institutional framework and coordination, Croatia case study, Ankara 24 May 2016

A jo

int

initi

ativ

e of

the

OEC

D a

nd th

e Eu

rope

an U

nion

,pr

inci

pally

fina

nced

by

the

EU

Conclusion

• Challenging process, as it needs:

- establishment of an effective coordination system that will enable clear definition of national interests and priorities- adjustment of procedural rules- avoidance of double coordination mechanisms (EU affairs are regular affairs)- establishment of cooperation mechanisms with stakeholders (businesses, trade unions, universities, civil society)

29