mariners(coalitionsubcommittee( meetingofoctober17,2012 · 5" "...

16
1 MARINERS COALITION SUBCOMMITTEE Meeting of October 17, 2012 ATTENDEES : Jim Acheson, Acheson Ventures Steve Blair, Supt., Canada Border Services Agency Jeff Bohm, St. Clair County Commissioner Dave Brown, Acheson Ventures Karen Czernel, District Director, House of Representatives Dave Dusellier, U. S. Customs & Border Protection Larry Krabach, Port Huron Power Squadron Gerald Little, U.S. Customs & Border Protection Bob Mattson, Port Huron Power Squadron Dennis J. Maurey, St. Clair County Sheriff Dept. – Marine Division Tom Rankin, Canadian Chief of Operations – Canada Border Services Agency Terry Ruff, U.S. Customs & Border Protection Kevin Stryker, Officer in Charge, U.S. Coast Guard Station, Port Huron MEMBERS ABSENT : John Borkovich – Michigan DNR, Law Enforcement Division Gary Calhoun U.S. Customs & Border Protection Tim Donnellon St. Clair County Sheriff Rodney Forbes, Desmond Marine Brian Hawkins XPO, U. S. Coast Guard Station, Port Huron Adrian Palomeque – Lt., Waterways Mgmt. Division Chief, USCGDet GUESTS : Josh Sparling, Candice Miller’s office Brad Dunham, U.S. Customs & Border Protection (in Gary Calhoun’s absence) Sandie DeHem, Mariners Coalition, Recording Secretary DAVE BROWN INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS Josh Sparling, Candice Miller’s office, Port Huron native, currently finishing Criminal Justice degree Brad Dunham – Active Assistant Port Director, U.S. Customs & Border Protection (replacing Gary Calhoun who is on extended TDY in London, England) #1 – APPROVAL OF MINUTES BROWN: Asked for any comments or changes to the minutes for the meeting held on May 17, 2012. The minutes were accepted without change.

Upload: others

Post on 04-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MARINERS(COALITIONSUBCOMMITTEE( MeetingofOctober17,2012 · 5" " MAUREY:(We"also"had"noproblems"–itwasagoodday.The"Coast"Guardwas"the"lead"agency"on"this"event,"and"we"assisted."""

1    

MARINERS  COALITION  SUBCOMMITTEE  Meeting  of  October  17,  2012  

                     ATTENDEES:  

Jim  Acheson,  Acheson  Ventures  Steve  Blair,  Supt.,  Canada  Border  Services  Agency  Jeff  Bohm,  St.  Clair  County  Commissioner  Dave  Brown,  Acheson  Ventures  Karen  Czernel,  District  Director,  House  of  Representatives  Dave  Dusellier,  U.  S.  Customs  &  Border  Protection  Larry  Krabach,  Port  Huron  Power  Squadron  Gerald  Little,  U.S.  Customs  &  Border  Protection    Bob  Mattson,  Port  Huron  Power  Squadron  Dennis  J.  Maurey,  St.  Clair  County  Sheriff  Dept.  –  Marine  Division  Tom  Rankin,  Canadian  Chief  of  Operations  –  Canada  Border  Services  Agency    Terry  Ruff,  U.S.  Customs  &  Border  Protection  Kevin  Stryker,  Officer  in  Charge,  U.S.  Coast  Guard  Station,  Port  Huron      

MEMBERS  ABSENT:     John  Borkovich  –  Michigan  DNR,  Law  Enforcement  Division  

Gary  Calhoun  -­‐  U.S.  Customs  &  Border  Protection    Tim  Donnellon  -­‐  St.  Clair  County  Sheriff    

  Rodney  Forbes,  Desmond  Marine      Brian  Hawkins  -­‐  XPO,  U.  S.  Coast  Guard  Station,  Port  Huron    Adrian  Palomeque  –  Lt.,  Waterways  Mgmt.  Division  Chief,  USCG-­‐Det  

 GUESTS:       Josh  Sparling,  Candice  Miller’s  office     Brad  Dunham,  U.S.  Customs  &  Border  Protection  (in  Gary  Calhoun’s  absence)  

 Sandie  DeHem,  Mariners  Coalition,  Recording  Secretary  

   DAVE  BROWN-­‐  INTRODUCTION  OF  GUESTS  

Josh  Sparling,  Candice  Miller’s  office,  Port  Huron  native,  currently  finishing  Criminal  Justice  degree    Brad  Dunham  –  Active  Assistant  Port  Director,  U.S.  Customs  &  Border  Protection  (replacing  Gary  Calhoun  who  is  on  extended  TDY  in  London,  England)          

#1  –  APPROVAL  OF  MINUTES      BROWN:    Asked  for  any  comments  or  changes  to  the  minutes  for  the  meeting  held  on  May  17,  2012.    The  minutes  were  accepted  without  change.        

   

Page 2: MARINERS(COALITIONSUBCOMMITTEE( MeetingofOctober17,2012 · 5" " MAUREY:(We"also"had"noproblems"–itwasagoodday.The"Coast"Guardwas"the"lead"agency"on"this"event,"and"we"assisted."""

2    

#2  -­‐  OUTREACH  FOR  CANADIAN  BOATERS  REPORTING  IN  TO  CBSA  UPON  RETURN  FROM  TRIPS  TO  U.S.  -­‐  CBSA  REPORTING  ISSUES  REGARDING  U.S.  BOATERS    

 RANKIN:    This  past  year  we  ran  some  surveys  on  weekends  to  see  what  percentages  of  Canadian  and  American  boaters  report  in.    We  found  that  U.S.  boaters  were  reporting  in  to  the  Telephone  Report  Center  at  a  high  rate.    However,  only  one-­‐third  of  Canadian  boaters  who  reported  in  to  USCBP  on  the  U.S.  side  reported  in  to  CBSA  when  returning  to  the  Canadian  side.    These  surveys  were  done  locally  for  a  couple  of  weekends  over  this  past  summer.    They  indicate  that  the  majority  of  Canadian  boaters  are  not  complying  with  the  rules,  and  we  would  like  some  feedback  from  the  stakeholder  marinas  to  see  if  perhaps  there  is  a  problem  with  our  reporting  system,  and  if  there  is  a  way  we  can  jointly  educate  the  boating  community.    This  issue  will  be  of  concern  to  the  marinas,  as  clients  may  become  a  problem  involved  in  enforcement  penalty  situations.    These  incidents  could  become  difficult  for  marina  operators  as  well,  if  this  situation  occurs  on  your  property.    We  don’t  want  that.    We  want  to  educate  these  folks,  and  we  are  looking  for  marina  operators  to  assist  us  in  promoting  compliance,  specifically  on  the  Canadian  side,  to  avoid  these  difficult  situations  that  we  could  be  running  into  next  summer.      BROWN:    This  information  is  not  encouraging,  and  I  am  actually  very  surprised  at  the  number  because  the  majority  of  boaters  have  Nexus  and  I-­‐68’s.    I’m  not  sure  why  they  would  not  be  reporting  back  in  on  their  return.      Sarnia  Bay  and  Bridgeview  Marina  operations  have  a  newsletter  that  will  be  going  out  shortly  to  our  Canadian  marina  operations.    We  have  approximately  850  boaters  now.    I  will  make  sure  that  is  clear  in  the  newsletter  that  the  results  of  your  survey  indicate  only  one-­‐third  of  the  boaters  are  reporting  back  in,  and  that  the  ramifications  of  not  reporting  back  in  could  be  severe  beginning  next  summer.      RANKIN:    Not  all  of  these  folks  are  your  clients.    Some  are  residents  using  their  personal  slips.    We  will  focus  on  those  as  well,  but  if  you  could  assist  us  with  your  clients,  it  would  be  greatly  appreciated.      BROWN:    It’s  interesting  that  if  they  are  reporting  on  the  U.S.  side  they  should  know  they  have  to  report  back  in  on  the  other  side.    There  is  obviously  communication  between  authorities.    RANKIN:    Our  goal  is  education.    We  want  to  let  people  know  we  will  be  attacking  this  situation  more  aggressively  next  year  and  expect  to  see  compliance.      ACHESON:    Just  a  comment,  not  a  solution  –  as  one  who  goes  to  Canada  several  times  during  the  summer,  my  biggest  problem  with  Canadian  Customs  is  in  how  to  report  the  liquor.    I  also  see  that  with  my  colleagues.    We  don’t  have  that  problem  coming  back  this  way.    I  have  a  fully  stocked  bar,  and  know  there  are  customs  rules.    Every  time  I  call  or  go  over  it  is  stressful.    I  am  tense  about  what  I  will  be  asked.    Will  I  have  to  do  an  inventory?    Will  there  be  a  fee  involved?      RANKIN:    I  understand  that.    Those  are  the  laws.    A  visitor  to  Canada  is  allowed  to  bring  in  40  ounces  duty  free  per  person  per  trip.    If  there  is  more  than  that,  it  is  subject  to  duties  and  taxes.    If  you  explain  it  is  in  your  boat  all  the  time  and  that  you  will  not  be  consuming  it,  the  officer  may  use  some  discretion  in  that  regard,  but  I  can  see  that  it  might  be  an  issue.      

Page 3: MARINERS(COALITIONSUBCOMMITTEE( MeetingofOctober17,2012 · 5" " MAUREY:(We"also"had"noproblems"–itwasagoodday.The"Coast"Guardwas"the"lead"agency"on"this"event,"and"we"assisted."""

3    

This  issue  I  am  describing  is  with  our  own  citizens.    The  compliance  is  fine  with  Americans  and  other  visitors.    The  problem  is  more  our  own  people  who  have  left  the  country  and  are  coming  back.      BROWN:    Back  to  Jim’s  comment,  in  all  the  years  I  have  been  boating  here,  I  don’t  think  I  know  of  anyone  getting  being  fined  for  additional  liquor  on  their  boat,  especially  one  like  Jim’s  with  a  full  bar.      BLAIR:    Not  once  this  year  was  this  an  issue.    If  it’s  your  bar  stock,  it  is  not  an  issue.  We  understand  it  is  not  coming  in  to  be  left  here.    We  have  never  made  an  issue  of  it.    We  examined  a  lot  of  boats  this  year,  and  we  have  never  made  an  issue  of  the  liquor.      ACHESON:    When  I  talk  to  Hamilton,  it  is  a  different  story.      BLAIR:    They  have  to  ask  you.    All  we  are  asking  is  for  your  honest  declaration,  and  make  a  determination  from  there.    If  it  is  bar  stock,  it  shouldn’t  be  a  problem.        RANKIN:      If  you  declare  it  up  front,  it  is  unlikely  to  be  a  problem.    When  folks  don’t  declare  it,  they  could  have  a  problem.    When  declared,  there  is  no  penalty  applied.    The  client  has  the  option  to  take  the  alcohol  back  to  the  U.S.  instead  of  entering.        DUSELLIER:    When  we  are  down  in  Marine  City,  we  see  large  quantities  of  beer  being  transported  back,  as  many  as  eight  and  ten  cases  in  every  trunk.    If  a  Canadian  is  going  back  with  it  on  their  boats,  they  will  have  to  pay,  which  they  might  not  be  reporting.    We  are  supposed  to  collect  duty  too.    We  have  an  in-­‐house  rule,  if  it  is  less  than  $10,  it  isn’t  worth  our  time.    BROWN:    As  a  sign  of  cooperation,  in  addition  to  the  newsletter,  we  will  put  notices  in  marinas  both  in  Sarnia  and  Port  Huron  to  remind  boaters  that  they  have  to  report  back  in.      RANKIN:    Maybe  we  can  prepare  something  for  you  to  post.    BLAIR:      We  have  a  fact  sheet  for  boaters.    It  was  distributed  at  our  last  meeting.    I  can  provide  that  again.    It  includes  good  information  on  do’s  and  don’ts  for  boaters.      KRABACH:    How  much  alcohol  are  you  allowed  to  take  in  as  an  American  citizen?    I  may  be  there  for  a  week,  and  I  can’t  get  to  an  LCBO  because  we  are  on  an  island.  How  much,  and  does  it  have  an  effect  on  how  long  you  are  staying?      RANKIN:    The  amount  is  40  ounces  per  person.    If  you  need  more  than  that,  you  would  have  to  go  to  LCBO.    In  general,  the  length  of  time  is  generally  24  hours.    We  allow  a  visitor  to  bring  in  the  40  ounces  or  a  case  of  24  beers.    It  is  supposed  to  be  for  your  own  personal  consumption.    As  long  as  you  are  here  for  the  length  of  time  necessary  for  you  to  consume  the  alcohol,  which  is  considered  to  be  24  hours.      DUSELLIER:    On  the  U.S.  side,  each  time  you  cross  the  border  you  can  bring  a  bottle,  not  by  day,  but  for  each  crossing.    Some  people  get  caught  in  our  laws  on  both  sides  just  because  of  ignorance.    Unless  it  is  something  extremely  violating,  we  are  most  likely  to  just  say  don’t  do  that  again.    

Page 4: MARINERS(COALITIONSUBCOMMITTEE( MeetingofOctober17,2012 · 5" " MAUREY:(We"also"had"noproblems"–itwasagoodday.The"Coast"Guardwas"the"lead"agency"on"this"event,"and"we"assisted."""

4    

 

CANADIAN  RESTRICTIONS  ON  INNOCENT  PASSAGE      BROWN:    With  regard  to  another  matter,  I  would  like  discuss  reporting  issues  as  it  relates  to  U.S.  boaters.    We  understand  it  is  your  responsibility  to  uphold  this  law.    It  is  not  my  intention  to  “shoot  the  messenger”  here.    We  want  to  get  this  law  changed,  and  to  that  end,  we  have  initiated  a  petition.      The  petition  basically  argues  that  once  a  boater  crosses  the  “imaginary  line”,  it  is  necessary  to  report  in  to  customs.        It  is  my  understanding  that  this  law  was  apparently  generated  because  of  the  1,000  Islands  in  Kingston  area.    Apparently,  a  bureaucrat  got  involved  and  amended  it.    My  objective  is  to  get  this  law  overturned  or  at  least  amended  so  it  makes  some  common  sense.      Jim  has  also  approached  diplomats  on  the  U.S.  side  to  address  this  issue.    RANKIN:    There  were  no  instances  of  concern  in  our  area  this  year.    KRABACH:    I  have  a  question  about  transit.    Because  the  freighters  keep  moving,  there  is  some  confusion  about  crossing  the  “imaginary  line”  going  back  and  forth.    Do  I  have  to  report  every  time  I  cross  that  line?      RANKIN:    If  you  are  in  transit  and  you  cross  the  “imaginary  line”,  but  do  not  land  on  Canadian  soil,  you  do  not  have  to  report  in.      We  understand  it  is  a  big  concern  for  boaters  that  the  law  will  be  enforced.    We  don’t  police  the  waterways  other  than  at  designated  reporting  stations,  those  places  where  boats  have  called  us  from  to  report  back  in.    In  between  those  places,  back  on  the  water,  is  the  responsibility  of  the  RCMP.    At  times  we  join  forces  with  them,  but  they  would  have  to  speak  to  this  issue.      Since  there  were  no  incidents  this  summer,  I  would  interpret  that  as  an  area  that  is  not  of  major  concern  to  Canadian  authorities.      BROWN:    It  is  my  experience  the  RCMP  also  agreed  with  us  on  this  issue.    It’s  good  to  hear  there  have  been  no  incidents  or  concerns  from  you  with  regard  to  this  issue.        

#3  -­‐  PORT  HURON/SARNIA  INTERNATIONAL  OFFSHORE  POWER  BOAT  RACE  –      SATURDAY,  8/11  &  SUNDAY,  8/12/2012    BROWN:    Asked  Kevin  Stryker  for  his  comments  regarding  the  race.        STRYKER:    The  race  went  very  well  this  year.    One  thing  that  did  happen  was  that  because  of  freighter  traffic,  the  last  race  went  over  the  time  allotted  on  the  permit  by  about  twenty  minutes,  and  that  upset  some  boaters.    Next  year  we  will  adjust  the  time  on  the  permit  to  avoid  this  problem.    Other  than  that,  the  race  went  very  well.    We  had  great  support  from  all  agencies.      BROWN:    Thank  you.    You  had  the  ability  to  shut  the  race  down  and  chose  not  to.    Thank  you  very  much  on  behalf  of  both  communities.    We  agree  that  lengthening  the  time  on  the  permit  will  avoid  any  problem  next  year.    Again,  thank  you,  we  appreciate  that  you  did  not  shut  down  the  event.      

Page 5: MARINERS(COALITIONSUBCOMMITTEE( MeetingofOctober17,2012 · 5" " MAUREY:(We"also"had"noproblems"–itwasagoodday.The"Coast"Guardwas"the"lead"agency"on"this"event,"and"we"assisted."""

5    

MAUREY:    We  also  had  no  problems  –  it  was  a  good  day.    The  Coast  Guard  was  the  lead  agency  on  this  event,  and  we  assisted.        BOHM:    I’d  like  to  mention  that  the  St.  Clair  race  will  be  televised  on  Fox  Sports  on  October  24th  at  5  p.m.,  and  the  international  race  will  be  aired  on  Fox  Sports  October  31st  also  at  5  p.m.    We  did  a  press  release  on  this  today.    This  will  be  nationally  televised.      BROWN:    We  sponsored  and  agreed  to  that  filming  by  Fox  Network.    There  will  be  about  a  40-­‐minute  session  and  shows  both  communities.    This  should  be  a  nice  highlight  for  both  communities  as  well  as  the  race  community.        I  also  want  to  take  this  opportunity  to  thank  Steve  and  his  team  on  the  Canadian  side,  and  Terry  Ruff  on  the  U.S.  side  of  the  border.      You  did  an  excellent  job  in  getting  drivers  and  guests  from  Point  A  to  Point  B.    This  was  coordinated  in  an  excellent  and  professional  manner.        BLAIR:    You  gave  us  the  information  we  requested  ahead  of  time  which  assisted  us  in  doing  a  good  job  in  dealing  with  issues  as  they  arose.    Having  that  information  made  our  job  much  easier  to  do.    BROWN:    This  was  one  of  the  main  hurdles  we  had  last  year,  clearing  in  advance  who  was  coming  over  and  when.      Ed  Smith  and  Julie  from  St.  Clair  orchestrated  all  the  paperwork  to  announce  who  was  coming  back  and  forth.    They  did  this  in  a  fine  fashion  this  year,  and  then  we  had  Steve  and  his  group  who  coordinated  it  so  well.    Once  again,  gentlemen,  thank  you.    This  is  such  an  important  factor  to  the  race  itself.        

#4  –  2012  FLOAT  DOWN    BROWN:    Are  there  any  comments  regarding  the  Float  Down?    MAUREY:    This  went  well.    The  wind  cooperated  this  year  and  everybody  stayed  on  this  side.    There  were  not  as  many  incidents.    There  were  no  problems  on  the  shore  either  according  to  the  police.    A  lot  of  people  made  it  all  the  way  down  to  Marysville.    There  were  a  lot  of  people.    STRYKER:    This  is  the  first  year  the  river  was  completely  shut  down  on  both  sides.    Going  forward  we  will  continue  to  ask  for  this  as  it  eliminates  many  problems.    We  only  stopped  about  3  vessels  from  participating  due  to  their  makeup.    We  removed  less  than  10  people  from  the  river  because  of  hypothermia.    There  were  a  lot  of  people  in  the  water  that  day,  but  we  had  very  few  problems.    There  was  great  support  from  numerous  agencies.        RUFF:    There  were  several  rafters  on  the  Canadian  side  joining  in.    We  are  not  sure  if  they  came  all  the  way  over,  but  we  were  watching  them.    This  is  something  to  keep  an  eye  on.    In  this  case  we  are  not  sure  if  they  just  happened  to  be  out  rafting  that  day.        BLAIR:    A  few  people  jumped  in  from  under  the  bridge  on  the  Port  Huron  side,  but  there  were  no  incidents  of  anyone  coming  ashore  on  our  side.          

Page 6: MARINERS(COALITIONSUBCOMMITTEE( MeetingofOctober17,2012 · 5" " MAUREY:(We"also"had"noproblems"–itwasagoodday.The"Coast"Guardwas"the"lead"agency"on"this"event,"and"we"assisted."""

6    

     

#5  -­‐  NEW  MICHIGAN  BOATING  LAWS      BROWN:    The  next  item  on  our  agenda  is  in  regard  to  the  new  Michigan  boating  laws.    We  distributed  a  five-­‐page  summary  of  those  amended  laws  to  you  which  touches  on  the  new  laws  that  will  be  enacted  on  November  1st  of  this  year.    Dennis,  could  you  comment  on  the  material.    (Attachment  1)    MAUREY:    I  need  to  qualify  this  does  not  affect  the  federal  agencies,  these  are  Michigan  laws.           HOUSE  BILL  4845  (H-­‐2)  

   I  have  highlighted  the  pertinent  changes  to  the  current  law  in  my  handout.    The  highlighted  area  of  that  handout  reads  in  part:        

“The  bill  would  amend  Part  801  (Marine  Safety)  of  NREPA  to  allow  a  child  less  than  12  years    of  age  to  operate  a  motorboat  provided  he  or  she  has  been  issued  and  is  in  possession    of  a  boating  safety  certificate,  and  meets  all  of  the  other  conditions  as  specified  in  the  act.      

 The  bill  would  require  anyone  born  on  or  after  July  1,  1996,  to  have  been  issued  and  to    be  in  possession  of  a  water  safety  certificate  while  operating  a  motorboat  on  the  waters    in  Michigan.    This  provision  would  go  into  effect  on  July  1,  2012.”        (This  actually  takes  effect  November  1,  2012.)  

 Another  change  is  you  have  to  be  16  to  operate  a  PWC.    Previously  the  age  was  14,  and  now  it  is  16  years.    Because  of  a  jet  ski  accident  that  resulted  in  the  death  of  a  young  woman  who  borrowed  a  jet  ski  and  was  unfamiliar  with  how  to  operate  it  and  ran  into  a  dock,  the  age  has  now  been  raised  to  16  years  of  age.         HOUSE  BILL  4846  (H-­‐1)            

“Currently,  individuals  are  not  allowed  to  operate  a  vessel  on  Michigan  waters  if  they    are  towing  or  otherwise  assisting  a  person  on  water  skis,  etc.,  unless  a  person  capable  of  communicating  to  the  vessel  operator  the  condition  of  the  needs  of  the  person  being    towed  is  on  board  and  positioned  to  observe  the  person  being  towed.    The  bill  would  amend  Part  801  (Marine  Safety)  of  NREPA  to  add  an  additional  condition  to  individuals  towing  an  individual  on  water  skis,  etc.  by  requiring  an  individual  to  wear  the  proper  type  I,  type  II,    or  type  III  personal  flotation  devices.    Wearing  an  inflatable  personal  flotation  device    does  not  satisfy  this  requirement.”  

 It  used  to  be  that  kids  had  to  wear  type  I  lifejackets,  now  it  is  a  type  III.    I  would  prefer  to  see  they  wear  a  type  I  because  kids  would  be  face  up  in  the  water.    ACHESON:    Why  are  inflatables  not  included?        

Page 7: MARINERS(COALITIONSUBCOMMITTEE( MeetingofOctober17,2012 · 5" " MAUREY:(We"also"had"noproblems"–itwasagoodday.The"Coast"Guardwas"the"lead"agency"on"this"event,"and"we"assisted."""

7    

MAUREY:    Inflatables  are  impractical  for  wear  on  PWC’s  because  they  are  designed  to  inflate  when  wet,  a  frequent  condition  when  using  those  watercraft.      

BARGE  AREA    This  section  doesn’t  affect  us  too  much  here.    There  have  been  a  lot  of  problems  downriver,  and  they  are  affected  by  this.    There  was  a  situation  in  Algonac  in  Anchor  Bay  three  years  ago,  one  of  the  barges  was  not  lit  and  an  accident  occurred.         HOUSE  BILL  4848  (H-­‐1)    Basically,  before  we  could  only  arrest  for  reckless  operation.    This  gives  us  the  authority  to  write  a  charge  which  will  be  enhanced  by  any  previous  violation.           HOUSE  BILL  5110    We  have  talked  about  this  before.    An  officer  is  not  allowed  to  stop  for  safety  inspections  any  more  unless  we  see  a  violation.    We  don’t  think  this  will  affect  us  a  lot.    Most  of  the  time,  when  we  stop  someone,  we  check  the  life  jackets  anyway.      The  Sheriff’s  Department  no  longer  provides  free  vessel  safety  inspections.    Only  the  Power  Squadron  and  the  Coast  Guard  Auxiliary  now  do  that.          BOHM:    Will  there  be  any  boating  classes  offered  by  the  Sheriff’s  Department  or  anyone  else?        MAUREY:    Not  this  year.    Unfortunately,  there  is  just  no  money  in  the  budget.    We  spent  all  our  money  on  patrols  this  year.    I  will  try  to  do  something  in  the  afternoon,  after  school,  but  as  far  as  putting  deputies  into  the  schools,  there  just  is  no  money  for  that  this  year.    We  are  supposed  to  have  five  hours  of  instruction.    Sometimes  in  the  past  I  could  put  four  deputies  into  the  schools.    Instead,  I  will  put  out  a  memo  to  the  kids  and  offer  to  have  them  come  in  for  an  hour  and  a  half  at  school  for  a  couple  of  nights  a  week.    There  are  other  options,  for  instance,  they  can  self-­‐study  with  the  book,  or  take  the  test  on-­‐line.          BROWN:    Thank  you,  Dennis.    Well  done.  Thanks  for  bringing  this  to  our  attention.      I’d  like  to  say  that  we  did  a  quick  survey  on  both  sides  of  the  border  of  the  146  new  members  from  Canadian  and  U.S.  operations.    Out  of  that  number,  46%  have  utilized  the  website  for  the  Mariners  Coalition  group.    This  is  good  news.    We  promote  our  staff  and  give  out  our  Mariner  Coalition  cards,  and  boaters  access  our  website.    Their  comments  indicate  we  have  cleared  up  a  lot  of  the  misinformation,  and  that  we  assist  boaters  greatly  in  the  Nexus  process.      In  terms  of  any  significant  complaints,  we  have  had  very  few.    We  can  count  them  on  literally  one  hand.    We  are  achieving  our  objective  when  we  started  this  coalition,  which  was  to  assist  boaters  on  both  sides  of  the  river  by  providing  a  method  of  clarification  of  the  ambiguity  of  the  rules.      Gerald  and  David,  thanks,  it  is  good  to  have  you  report  back  that  it  is  working.      KRABACH:    Has  the  website  now  been  updated?    BROWN:    I’ve  spoken  to  Chris  in  IT,  and  I  believe  it  is  updated  currently.    As  a  result  of  this  Mariners  Coalition  meeting,  there  are  necessary  updated  changes  required  to  our  website  as  per  the  recent  reflection  from  Tom  Rankin.    Therefore,  these  amended  changes  will  be  completed  as  soon  as  possible  

Page 8: MARINERS(COALITIONSUBCOMMITTEE( MeetingofOctober17,2012 · 5" " MAUREY:(We"also"had"noproblems"–itwasagoodday.The"Coast"Guardwas"the"lead"agency"on"this"event,"and"we"assisted."""

8    

on  our  website.    If  you  find  anything  when  you  are  looking  at  it  that  needs  to  be  addressed,  please  let  us  know.          Even  though  we  only  get  together  twice  a  year,  it  is  good  to  know  we  have  this  type  of  a  group,  and  that  we  are  going  in  the  right  direction.    It  is  because  of  this  team  that  we  are  able  to  do  so.        

#6  -­‐  NEW  AGENDA  ITEM  –  ATTACHMENT  2    STRYKER:    (Passed  out  USCG  Flyer  –  Attachment  2).    This  information  has  just  been  passed  out  to  me.    It  discusses  the  new  Shiprider  program  that  was  just  passed.    You  will  see  more  information  on  this  program  next  spring  and  summer.    We  will  be  riding  along  with  Canadian  vessels,  working  with  RCMP  and  other  agencies.    They  will  also  be  on  our  boats  and  working  in  conjunction  with  us.    It  helps  with  working  against  the  criminals  when  they  are  in  hiding.    During  the  winter  months  the  education  will  be  happening.    I  currently  have  six  guys  trained.        RANKIN:    This  topic  is  getting  a  fair  bit  of  press  on  the  Canadian  side,  both  locally  and  in  the  national  papers.      STRYKER:    I  just  got  this  information  this  week.    If  you  have  any  questions,  please  send  them  my  way.        DUSELLIER:      Is  this  going  to  incorporate  our  air  and  marine?    STRYKER:    It  is  not  just  Coast  Guard  and  RMCP,  there  are  a  couple  of  other  agencies.    There  are  a  couple  of  guys  in  Marysville  that  are  already  trained.    Everyone  is  going  to  a  training  facility  in  Charleston  for  a  few  weeks.    I  believe  there  is  one  marine  agent  that  is  trained  now.    This  will  be  built  upon.      RANKIN:    There  is  good  surveillance  on  both  sides  of  the  waters.    You  have  a  surveillance  monitor  at  Selfridge.    We  have  a  similar  office  based  in  Niagara  Falls  near  St.  Catherines,  and  an  intelligence  officer  attached  to  Selfridge.    DUSELLIER:    As  you  now  know  those  cameras  are  working  for  both  sides.          ACHESON:    Most  of  us  probably  know,  but  the  Michigan  DNR  now  has  two  new  inflatables.    Unlike  the  Coast  Guard  and  the  Sheriff’s  Department,  the  DNR  is  perceived  by  boaters  to  be  the  Gestapo.    We  have  to  get  the  DNR  here  to  get  them  on  the  same  mindset  with  us.    I  think  it  is  important  to  get  them  on  board  with  our  organization.    We  want  to  minimize  the  hassling  of  boaters.      The  reason  we  started  the  Mariners  Coalition  is  to  encourage  people  to  boat  in  our  area.    MAUREY:    John  Borkovich  just  retired.      BROWN:    Dennis  can  you  provide  us  with  the  new  contact  name?    Perhaps  if  you  don’t  mind,  you  could  communicate  directly  with  Sandie,  and  we  will  send  him  minutes  from  this  meeting.    I  will  make  contact  with  him  to  get  him  to  join  us,  and  to  get  him  on  the  same  wavelength  as  this  group.      MATTSON:    About  the  Coalition  and  the  cards  you  have;  we  have  made  an  effort  that  those  are  given  out  all  our  classes,  even  the  advanced  classes,  and  also,  our  vessel  safety  program  that  we  do  every  

Page 9: MARINERS(COALITIONSUBCOMMITTEE( MeetingofOctober17,2012 · 5" " MAUREY:(We"also"had"noproblems"–itwasagoodday.The"Coast"Guardwas"the"lead"agency"on"this"event,"and"we"assisted."""

9    

year.    We  had  about  160  participate  this  year.    The  cards  are  given  out  at  that  a  time  as  well.    By  giving  these  cards  out,  we  find  that  this  helps  them.      BROWN:    As  part  of  our  welcome  package  at  all  the  marinas,  I  hear  from  both  sides  that  our  staff  explains  to  our  members  what  the  Mariners  Coalition  is  and  why  it  exists.    It  is  amazing  how  many  people  are  taking  advantage  of  this.    It’s  definitely  working.    That’s  excellent  news  from  you.      Thank  you  for  scheduling  time  on  behalf  of  Jim  and  myself.    We  appreciate  you  taking  time  from  your  busy  schedules  to  join  us  here  to  sustain  the  mission  of  the  Mariners  Coalition.      Meeting  adjourned  at  12:25  p.m.      Sandie  DeHem  Recording  Secretary    Attachments:  

1. Five  Page  Summary  –  New  Michigan  Boating  Laws    2. USCG  Handout  -­‐    Shiprider  Program    

     

Page 10: MARINERS(COALITIONSUBCOMMITTEE( MeetingofOctober17,2012 · 5" " MAUREY:(We"also"had"noproblems"–itwasagoodday.The"Coast"Guardwas"the"lead"agency"on"this"event,"and"we"assisted."""
Page 11: MARINERS(COALITIONSUBCOMMITTEE( MeetingofOctober17,2012 · 5" " MAUREY:(We"also"had"noproblems"–itwasagoodday.The"Coast"Guardwas"the"lead"agency"on"this"event,"and"we"assisted."""
Page 12: MARINERS(COALITIONSUBCOMMITTEE( MeetingofOctober17,2012 · 5" " MAUREY:(We"also"had"noproblems"–itwasagoodday.The"Coast"Guardwas"the"lead"agency"on"this"event,"and"we"assisted."""
Page 13: MARINERS(COALITIONSUBCOMMITTEE( MeetingofOctober17,2012 · 5" " MAUREY:(We"also"had"noproblems"–itwasagoodday.The"Coast"Guardwas"the"lead"agency"on"this"event,"and"we"assisted."""
Page 14: MARINERS(COALITIONSUBCOMMITTEE( MeetingofOctober17,2012 · 5" " MAUREY:(We"also"had"noproblems"–itwasagoodday.The"Coast"Guardwas"the"lead"agency"on"this"event,"and"we"assisted."""
Page 15: MARINERS(COALITIONSUBCOMMITTEE( MeetingofOctober17,2012 · 5" " MAUREY:(We"also"had"noproblems"–itwasagoodday.The"Coast"Guardwas"the"lead"agency"on"this"event,"and"we"assisted."""
Page 16: MARINERS(COALITIONSUBCOMMITTEE( MeetingofOctober17,2012 · 5" " MAUREY:(We"also"had"noproblems"–itwasagoodday.The"Coast"Guardwas"the"lead"agency"on"this"event,"and"we"assisted."""