mark gibson - compliance presentation
TRANSCRIPT
Can we come up with proposals to increase fisher
compliance?
BehavFish WorkshopICES, CopenhagenOctober 22, 2014
Fisheries Management is People Management Diverse Actors
Diverse Motivations
Diverse Methods
Diverse Fishery Structures
Compliance
“the degree to which the actions of an individual, or group of individuals, accord with the rights and rules to which they are bound”
Common Rule Types Access
Area
Gear
Capacity
Time
Catch
Effort
Reporting
Prevalence
Illegal and unreported fishing accounts for between 11 and 26 million tonnes annually.
The total value estimated to be between $10 bn and $23.5bn annually
Agnew, D.J., J. Pearce, G. Pramod, T. Peatman, R. Watson, J.R. Beddington, and T.J. Pitcher. 2009. Estimating the worldwide extent of illegal fishing. PLOS ONE, 4 (2):e4570
Compliance Theory
Rational Choice
E.g. Gary Becker (1968)
Right Realism E.g., Situational Crime Prevention
Behavioral Economics
E.g. Dan Ariely (2013)
Irrational Realism?
“Everybody Cheats”
Self-Concept Maintenance Theory
It would suggest that:
Most illegal fishing is conducted not by specialized, economically rational criminals, but by ordinary fishers that cheat by just a little.
Fisheries managers should begin to consider the “irrational” or non-economic factors affecting illegal fishing to better preserve their resources.
Fishers Cheat More?
Non-monetary Assets
Organization
Revenge
Mental Depletion
Opportunities
Revenge
Mental Depletion
In-Group Contagion/Desistance
Out-Group Desistance
Snowballing/Slippery Slope
Measuring Effectiveness
Direct
Observer program/EMS – costly
At-sea Inspections – Nonrandom, costly
Dockside Inspections – Limited detection, nonrandom
AIS/VMS – Limited detection of offenses
Indirect
Logbooks & Catch Reports – Potentially Biased
Supply Chain Audits – institutionally limited
Noncompliance Risk Perception? Contagion
False Consensus Effect
Case Study
Australian Fisheries Management Agency’s “show cause” model for closed areas
“Since its commencement, in June 2010, the program has resulted in a reduction in the number of suspected closure breaches of 87% over the first three months and an overall reduction of over 94%”
Arguably no new costs/risks were imposed on fishing operations
The Supervision Effect?