mark pederson application engineer acrp may 10 th 2012

46
Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Upload: martin-shoulders

Post on 14-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Mark Pederson

•Application Engineer•ACRP May 10th 2012

Page 2: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Overview

• Lifting Sling Testing> Introduction to Effect of D:d ratio> Single leg tests> Grommet tests> Basket tests> Choker tests> Published Spec Sheet

• Inspection Retirement Criteria> Sources for Guidelines> Mechanisms that Cause Damage> Inspection Items

• Hardware> Class1 Rope Hardware > Class2 Rope Hardware> Synthetic Rope Specific Hardware

Page 3: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Intro to Effect of D/d on Efficiency

• The Tighter the Bend the greater the stress Concentration• With High Modulus fibers this effect is more dramatic

Sling on a Pin:

Page 4: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Intro to Effect of D/d on Efficiency

Sling on a Pin:

Page 5: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Intro to Effect of D/d on Efficiency

Sling on a Pin:

• Parallel Core Is effected in a bend

Page 6: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Intro to Effect of D/d on Efficiency

Sling on a Pin:

• Braided Construction is beneficial

Page 7: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Single Leg Testing

> Single Leg• Weakest at base of splice

• 2:1 D/d recommended

• Efficiency > 1x Rope Strength

Page 8: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Single Leg Testing

> Single Leg

• Single leg slings are used to baseline most rope strengths

• Theoretical load distributions

• There is a true loss in bend around pin but each leg around pin only carries ~½ T

Page 9: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Single Leg Testing

> Single Leg Testing

• Straight Pull

• D:d = 8 , 4 , 1

• D/d = 1 did not show significant strength loss, however break occurred at the back of the eye (on the pin)

Page 10: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Grommet Testing

• Grommet strength is actually <2x rope strength

• Current industry recommendations range from 1.6-1.8x entered

Page 11: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Grommet Testing

• Grommet configuration highlights bending losses

Page 12: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Grommet Testing• D/d Grommet Strength, Bearing size is

critical for assuring proper design and maintaining grommet efficiency

Page 13: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Grommet Testing• D/d Grommet Strength, Bearing size is

critical for assuring proper design and maintaining grommet efficiency

Page 14: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Grommet Testing

• Splice Placement on D:d >4 :> Splice area centered on the pin

allows the legs to more evenly adjust upon loading.

> Two splices do not produce a more efficient sling.

> Testing has proven that the splice is more efficient with lower D:d ratios

A 1.6-1.8xB 1.7-1.9xC 1.7xD 1.75x

Page 15: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Grommet Testing

> Grommet• Weakest on the back of pin

• 8:1 D/d recommended

• Efficiency ≤ 1.6x Rope Strength

Page 16: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Basket Testing

• Basket

Page 17: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Choker Testing

• Current recommendations:> ASME B30.9 80% (PET

roundslings)

> Flory/Richards* 60% (HMPE slings)

• Test Results*:• 12-strand, HMPE fiber

> Ranged from 60% - 75% (varied by manufacturer)

• Choke Angle is critical> Choker strength

Page 18: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Choker Testing

• Single leg and Grommet in Choker• 3/8” and ¾”

Page 19: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Lifting Sling Table

> Layout• Similar to ANSI table layout

• 5:1 Safety Factor built in

• Common horizontal angles rated for basket lifts

• Minimum D/d recommended

• Reductions for lower basket D/d

• Inspection and retirement Criteria included

Page 20: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Sling Table

Page 21: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

> Updated Sling Table• Choker Slings• Adjustable Slings

Page 22: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Large Diameter Sling Testing

• Tested slings in a large range of sizes

• Developed a model that is used to design project specific lifts

Page 23: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Overview

• Lifting Sling Testing> Single leg > Grommet> Basket> Choker> Published Spec Sheet

• Inspection Retirement Criteria> Sources for Guidelines> Mechanisms that Cause Damage> Inspection Items

• Hardware> Class1 Rope Hardware > Class2 Rope Hardware> Synthetic Rope Specific Hardware

Page 24: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Inspection Retirement Criteria

• Inspection Retirement Criteria> Sources for Guidelines

• Cordage Institute - International association of rope twine and related manufactures/Suppliers .

• Educating on the proper use of products through standardsCI 2001-04“Fiber Rope Inspection and Retirement Criteria

• Rope Type, Damage Description, Reference Txt, Reference Picture, Repair , Downgrade , Retire

Page 25: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Inspection Retirement Criteria

• Inspection Retirement Criteria> Sources for Guidelines

• Handbook of fibre rope technology [Book] by Henry A. McKenna, J. W. S. Hearle, Nick O'Hear, Textile Institute (Manchester, England) in Books

• Very similar to the Cordage Institute

Page 26: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Inspection Retirement Criteria

• Inspection Retirement Criteria> Sources for Guidelines

• Samson Rope

Page 27: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Inspection Retirement Criteria

> Mechanisms that Cause Damage

Excessive Tension / Shock Loading Cyclic Tension WearExternal AbrasionCuttingPulled Strands and YarnsFlex Fatigue or Bending FatigueTerminationsKnotsAxial Compression and Kink BandsHockle, Twist , Kink or CorkscrewSunlight DegradationChemical and Heat DegradationDirt or Grit Particulate

Page 28: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Inspection Retirement Criteria

Initial Inspection

• IF > Rope Displays Moderate Wear> No history of use> Potential injury or damage to equipment

= Downgrade or Retire the rope

Samson / Cordage Institute / Handbook of fibre rope technology

Page 29: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Inspection Retirement Criteria

• Cyclic Tension Wear• IF:

> Broken Internal Filaments over Length> Matted Filaments at strand rub areas=Downgrade / Retire

Samson / Cordage Institute / Handbook of fibre rope technology

Page 30: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Inspection Retirement CriteriaExternal Abrasion• IF:

> Rope Cross Section reduced by 10% in whole rope=Downgrade / Retire

• IF:> Rope Cross Section reduced by 25% =Repair/ Retire

Samson / Cordage Institute / Handbook of fibre rope technology

Page 31: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Inspection Retirement CriteriaCutting• IF:

> Rope Cross Section reduced by 10% in whole rope=Downgrade / Retire

• IF:> Rope Cross Section reduced by greater than 10% =Repair/ Retire

Samson / Cordage Institute / Handbook of fibre rope technology

Page 32: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Inspection Retirement Criteria

• Pulled Strand

> Less than 15% of strands are pulled out a repair can be made.> Greater than 20% of strands are pulled out a repair should not be

made. Downgrade the rope and retire

Samson / Cordage Institute / Handbook of fibre rope technology

Page 33: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Inspection Retirement CriteriaFlex Wear on Pulleys/ Rollers• IF:

> Internal Fusion> Wear on strand crowns> Broken filaments at strand rub points =Downgrade / Retire

Samson / Cordage Institute / Handbook of fibre rope technology

Page 34: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Inspection Retirement CriteriaFlex Wear on Pulleys/ Rollers

Page 35: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Inspection Retirement CriteriaSpliced Eye• IF:

> Cuts> Splice Pulling out> Incorrect Splice> Damaged Thimble=Repair

Page 36: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Inspection Retirement CriteriaCreep • IF:

> Rope Exceeds limits set by manufacture> History of the rope indicates it is a concern=Retire

Page 37: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Inspection Retirement CriteriaCompression

Page 38: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Inspection Retirement Criteria

Sunlight Degradation• IF:

> Polypropolene, Brittle and broken outer fibers= Retire> Ropes less than 1” diameter, 1yr plus exposure, aramid, nylon,

polypro=Retire/ Downgrade

Page 39: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Inspection Retirement Criteria

Chemical And Heat Degradation

• IF:> Known exposure= Retire> Discoloration, Brittle Fibers, Stiff,=Retire

Page 40: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Inspection Retirement Criteria

Dirt or Grit

• IF:> Dirt or Grit is found internally> Broken an powdery fiber present= Retire

Page 41: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Overview

• Lifting Sling Testing> Single leg > Grommet> Basket> Choker> Published Spec Sheet

• Inspection Retirement Criteria> Sources for Guidelines> Mechanisms that Cause Damage> Inspection Items

• Hardware> Class1 Rope Hardware > Class2 Rope Hardware> Synthetic Rope Specific Hardware

Page 42: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Hardware

• Hardware> Class1 Rope Hardware Lower Strength , Higher Elongation FibersPlastic Thimbles , Non Reinforced Thimbles , Plastic Spools

Page 43: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Hardware

• Hardware

> Class2 Rope HardwareHigh Strength , Low Elongation FibersTubular Thimbles, Reinforced Thimbles, Aluminum Spools

Page 44: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Hardware

• Hardware> Synthetic Rope Specific Hardware / Shackles> Wide body shackle> Crosby Sling Saver Spool

Page 45: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

Hardware

> Shackles

• Standard and Wide Body

• Small D/d for Grommets

• Quick Easy and readily available

Page 46: Mark Pederson Application Engineer ACRP May 10 th 2012

• Thank you!

• Questions