marketi ng changes in federal milk marketing orders: … · 2011. 2. 9. · mr. myron r. mckinley...
TRANSCRIPT
MARKETI NG CHANGES IN FEDERAL MILK MARKETING ORDERS:
A Farm-Level Analysis of Milk Diversion Program
Participants and Non-Participants
Part II: January 1984-March 1985 April-June 1985 Preliminary
Federal Milk Market Administrators Research Paper No. 2
October 1985
PREFACE
The information in this report was compiled and analyzed at the Of fice
of the Market Administrator, New York-New Jersey Milk Marketing Area, in
cooperation with the Dairy Division, Agricultural Marketing Service, United
States Department of Agriculture (AMS-USDA).
All Federal Milk Market Administrators provided information for this
study.
Copies of this report may be obtained from the Market Administrators
or the Dairy Division, AMS-USDA (see next page for addresses).
Mr. W. Joe Albright Market Administrator 5501 N. 19th Avenue, Suite 230 Phoenix, AZ 85015
Mr. Richard E. Arnold Market Administrator P.O. Box 470563 Tulsa, OK 74147
Mr. Marvin A. Baumer Market Administrator 2684 W. Eleven Mile Road Berkley, MI 48072
Mr. Chapman E. Dunham Market Administrator P.O. Box 29529 Dallas, TX 75229
Mr. C. Mack Endsley Market Administrator P.O. Box 29226 Columbus, OH 43229
Mr. Paul W. Halnon Market Administrator P.O. Box 4790 Winter Park, FL 32793
Mr. Myron R. McKinley Market Administrator 800 Roosevelt Road Building A, Suite 200 Glen Ellyn, IL 60137
Mr. Dormal Newberry Market Administrator P.O. Box 49025 Atlanta, GA 30359
Dr. Donald R. Nicholson Market Administrator P.O. Box 1485 Maryland Heights, MO 63043
- 2 -
Mr. Aaron L. Reeves Market Administrator 4570 W. 77th Street, Suite 210 Minneapolis, MN 55435
Mr. Frank Sheckarski Market Administrator P.O. Box 23606 Portland, OR 97223
Mr. Joseph D. Shine Market Administrator P.O. Box 710 Alexandria, VA 22313
Mr. Arnold M. Stallings Market Administrator P.O. Box 18030 Louisville, KY 40218
Mr. Thomas A. Wilson Market Administrator 708 Third Avenue New York, NY 10017
Mr. Robert D. \vright Market Administrator P.O. Box 4606 Overland Park, KS 66204
Mr. Herbert E. Shepard Market Administrator P.O. Box 1478 Boston, MA 02205
Mr. Joel L. Blum Deputy Director Dairy Division Agricultural Marketing Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Washington, DC 20250
- 3 -
ABSTRACT
Market Administrators in Federal milk marketing orders combined their
records with Milk Diversion Program (MDP) information provided by the
Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service in order to analyze
marketing changes on individual dairy farms. This report, the second in a
series, contains information for the five quarters of the program (January
1984-March 1985) and preliminary information for the first post-diversion
quarter (April-June 1985).
Monthly Federal order marketing records for over one hundred thousand
farms, representing approximately 60 percent of total United States milk
marketings, were compiled and analyzed for this study. ASCS diversion
contracts were used to divide farms into two groups: farms with a signed
diversion contract to reduce marketings (MDP participants) and farms which
chose not to participate (non-participants). Three comparisons were done:
1983 marketings versus the base period (1981/82) marketings; 1984/85 versus
the base period; and 1984/85 versus 1983/84.
Prior to the Milk Diversion Program, MDP participants had a much
greater tendency to reduce marketings. Between the base period and 1983,
approximately two-thirds of participants decreased marketings. The
inverse was true for non-participants; apppoximately two-thirds of this
group increased marketings in 1983 relative to the base period.
Many farms chose not to participate despite incurring 1983 marketing
declines of 5 percent or more, i.e., declines sufficient to qualify them
for diversion payments with no additional declines needed. Approximately
18,000 farms in the study had decreased marketings more than 5 percent in
1983 relative to their base period. However, only one-third of this group
(6,326 farms) chose to participate in the program. The participation rate
of the MDP-qualifying group was especially low in the northern Federal
Orders.
During the 15 months of the program, MDP participants decr eased
marketings an average of 25.8 percent below their base-period levels.
It is estimated that about 98 percent of all participants had marketings
within contract levels.
Large numbers of non-participants also reduced marketings between the
base period and the 1984/85 MDP period. During each quarterly period, in
fact, the number of non-participants with marketing declines of five
- 4 -
percent or more ("qualifying non-participants") exceeded the number of
participants for all Orders combined. These qualifying non-participants
lost out on substantial payments by not participating. For the Orders
examined, 15,533 qualifying non-participants had 2.1 billion pounds of
qualifying declines with a potential MDP payment value of $211 mil l ion.
This represents an average loss of $13,600 per farm. Extrapolating on a
national basis, payments to qualifying non-participants could have cos t the
government an additional 400-500 million dollars in MDP costs without any
additional marketing declines being incurred.
MDP participants decreased marketings substantially during each
quarter of the program relative to the same quarter a year earlier.
However, because of marketing declines incurred by this group in 1983, the
rate of decline in most quarters was 3 to 6 percentage points below the
ra te of decline experienced relative to the base period. In the final
quarter of the program (January-March 1985), participants decreased
marketings only 9.1.percent because this quarter was being compared with
the ·same quarter a year earlier (January-March 1~84), a quarter in which
participants had already attained significant marketing declines.
Non-participants played a surprisingly large role in year-to-year
declines in U.S. marketings incurred during the last four quarters of the
MDP period. Non-part!cipants increased marketings one percent or less in
the second and fifth quarters of the program and actually decreased
marketings during the third and fourth quarters. In all MDP quarters but
the first, the majority of non-participants decreased marketings compared
to the previous year and in every quarter, the marketing decliIles for
"decreasing" non-participants were larger in volume than the declines for
all participants.
Preliminary data for the first quarter of the post-diversion period
(April-June 1985) indicates that most MDP participants (almost
three-fourths) began to increase marketings after the program. For all
participants, the average increase relative to April-June 1984 was 15.1
percent.
Non-participants as a group increased marketings 4.3 percent in the
April-June 1985 period relative to last year. During this first
post-diversion quarter, nop.-participants were responsible for substan t ially
greater marketing increases (volume basis) than were participants.
~
- 5 -
INTRODUCTION
After five consecutive years of increases, United States (U.S.) milk
marketings decreased 3.6 percent in 1984. U. S. marketings continued to
decline during the first quarter of 1985, although the rate of decline fell
to 1.0 percent. This period of decline coincides with, and has often been
attributed to, the Milk Diversion Program (MDP) which was authorized by the
"Dairy and Tobacco Adjustment Act of 1983." Under this program, dairy
farmers could contract with the government to reduce their milk marke t ings
for the period January 1, 1984-March 31, 1985 by at least five percent , but
not more than thirty percent, from their marketing level in a comparable
period of 1981 and/or 1982 (the base period). They would receive payment
for the amount of reduction on the basis of $10 per hundredweight provided
their contract requirement was fulfilled.
While 37,757 dairy farmers did contract to reduce production (MDP
participants), they only represented about twenty percent of all commercial
dairy farms. The remaining eighty percent chose not to participate
(non-participants).
I t is important to analyze the changes in marke tings which occurred
for each of these groups of dairy farmers during the 15 months of the
, diversion program and thereafter. This study attempts such an analysis
using monthly marketing records of farms delivering milk to handlers
regulated under Federal milk marketing orders. Part I of the study was
released in February 1985 and compared the first three quarterly periods
(and the nine-month period) of 1984 with the same periods in 1983 and the
base period (1981/82). This report (Part II) includes an overall
comparison of the five MDP quarters relative to the same quarters in the
previous year and the same quarters in the base period. Selected
cumulative data for annual 1984 and the fifteen-month 11DP period (January
1984-March 1985) is also presented. In addition, preliminary data for the
first quarter of the post-diversion period (April-June 1985) is presented.
Since Part I of the study was released, some additional data
concerning the January-September 1984 period has become available. This
updated information is presented in the Appendix tables.
A further analysis of the twelve-month period (April 1, 1985-March 31,
1986) following the end of the diversion program is planned.
- 6 -
METHODOLOGY
The methodology used in this report is the same as that which was used
in Part I. The study examined marketing changes (for individual producers)
that occurred between a recent quarterly (three-month) time period and two
comparison periods: same quarter a year earlier and same quarter during the
base period. The five quarterly periods during which the Milk Diversion
Program was in effect constituted the study period. These quarterly
periods cover the four quarters of 1984 (January-March, April-June,
July-September, and October-December) and· the first quarter of 1985
(January-March).
The first report also considered
January-September 1984. This report
the nine-month cumulative period,
does limited comparisons for the
twelve-month cumulative period, January-December 1984,
fifteen-month cumulative period January 1984-March 1985.
and the
As discussed in the earlier report, there were specific criteria to
determine which producers could be included in the study group. These were
developed because of the nature of Federal milk marketing order producer
data. If a producer ceased marketing milk under a specific order sometime
during the study period, it could not be assumed that the producer ceased
production. In ·order to be included in a quarterly analysis, the producer
had to market milk in the order during at least one month in that quarter.
In order to be included in the cumulative fifteen-month analysis, the ·
producer had to have production in the last month of the cumulative period
(March 1985).
Another criterion established for including a producer in the study
was that the producer had to have Federal order marketings in at least one
of the comparison periods as well as some time during the five-quarter
1984/85 MDP period. This resulted in the · exclusion of producers who had
short marketing histories under a specific order. However, a producer did
not have to have marketing records for the entire period (1981/82 through
1984/1985) to be included in the study. Producers with 1983 information
but no base information were included in the 1983 versus 1984 comparisons
but excluded from the base period versus 1984 comparisons. In some cases
involving MDP participants, marketings reported by producers on their ASCS
contract forms were used if Federal order data was incomplete.
[
-- 7 -
ANALYSIS
The number of farms and the total milk marketings included in the
study differ according to the time period and comparison period b eing
considered. These statistics, along with the percentage of U.S. marketings
and total Federal order marketings represented by the study, are shown in
Table 1. There were 80-100 thousand commercial dairy farms represented and
they marketed, in most quarters, more than half the milk in the country. II Every significant milk production region in the United States was
represented in the study with the exception of California. There a r e no
Federal orders in that state.
The marketing history of producers prior to the implementation of the
milk diversion program appeared to be a significant factor in producers'
decisions to participate in the program. Marketing records from
approximately 13,000 participants and 57,000 non-participants, marketing 55
billion pounds of milk during 1983, were used in Table 2. Participants as
a group decreased marketings by 5.0 percent prior to the beginning of the
program, while non-participants increased marketings 6.5 percent.
Approximately two-thirds of all participants registered a decrease and the
remaining one-thfrd registered an increase. In contrast, only about
one-third of all non-participants registered a decrease while two-thirds
increased marketings.
A more detailed analysis is shown in Tables 3 and 4. Approximately
18,000 producers, or 25 percent of all producers considered, decreased
marketings more than 5 percent in 1983 relative to their base period. As
shown in Table 4, only one-third of these producers (6,326) actually
participated in the program despite marketing levels that would have
qualified them for diversion payments with no additional marketing declines
needed.
The distribution of the producers with marketing declines of over 5
percent shows that the majority of such producers in southern marketing
orders (Gecrgia, St. Louis-Ozarks, Southwest Plains, Central Arkansas,
II The numbers in Table 1 may differ from those reported in the first report because additional data has become available since that report was published.
rJ
Table 1. Number of Farms and Their Milk Marketings in Study, by Comparison Period, January 1984-March 1985
1st. Quart.er 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 5t.h Quarter 12-months 15-months (Jan-Mar) (Apr-Jun) (Jul-Sep) (Oct.-Dec) (Jan-Mar 8~) (Jan-Dec 84) (Jan 84-Mar 85)
NUfTlber of farfTlS 1981/82-1984/85 COfTlparison
Participants 18,797 18,687 18,609 18,403 16,559 17,361 16,398 Non-participants 67,626 67,993 68,222 70,735 65,060 66,975 65,371
A 11 Farms 86,423 86,680 86,831 89,138 81,619 84,336 81,769
1983/84-1984/85 Comparison Part.icipant.s 18,473 18,391 18,341 18,179 16,607 17,157 N.A. Non-participants 83,132 83,882 83,895 82,212 77,188 78,390 N.A.
A 11 Farms 101,605 102,273 102,236 100,391 93,795 95,547 N.A.
Marketings (fTlillion pounds) 1981/82-1984/85 COfTlparison
Participants 3,593 3,402 3,082 3,031 2,872 12,894 14,908 Non-participants 13,213 13,520 12,474 13,658 13,484 55,623 65,339
All Farms 16,806 16,922 15,556 16,689 16,356 68,517 80,247
1983/84-1984/85 Comparison Participants 3,486 3,304 3,005 2,954 2,886 12,569 N.A. 00
Non-participants 16,368 16,907 15,723 15,385 15,513 63,745 N.A. All FarfTlS 19,854 20,211 18,728 18,339 18,399 76,314 N.A.
Total U.S. marketings (mil. lbs.) 33,189 34,845 32,695 31,641 32,847 132,370 165,217
1981/82-1984/85 as % of U.S. 50.6 48.6 47.6 52.7 49.8 51.8 48.6
1983/84-1984/85 as % of U.S. 59.8 58.0 57.3 58.0 56.0 57.7 N.A.
Total Federal Order marketi ngs (rni l. 1 bs. ) 23,353 24,016 22,298 22,012 23,127 91,679 114,806
1981/82-1984/85 as % of total Federal Order 72.0 70.5 69.8 75.8 70.7 74.7 69.9
1983/84-1984/85 as % of tot.al Federal Order 85.0 84.2 84.0 83.3 79.6 83.2 N.A.
i'I l1 r-=:t
Table 2. MDP Participants and Non-Participants, By Change in Marketings Between the Base Period (1981/82) and 1983, Selected Federal Orders
Percentage of Farms Average Percent Change Federal Order ParticiEants Non-ParticiEants in Marketings
Decreasing Increasing Decreasing Increasing All All Non-Name No. Marketings Marketings Marketings Marketings ParticiEants Participants
New England 1 74.0 26.0 39.4 60.6 - 6.3 5.0
New York-New Jersey 2 74.2 25.8 34.3 65.7 - 6.1 8.0
Georgia 7 78.5 21.5 40.2 59.8 -10.3 13.1
Chicago Regional 30 73.1 26.9 40.0 60.0 - 5.7 2.7
Southern Michigan 40 66.3 33.7 32.8 67.2 - 5.0 6.3
Indiana 49 66.4 33.6 30.2 69.8 - 5.8 6.7
St. Louis-Ozarks 62 61. 2 38.8 27.9 72.1 - 2.6 8.4
Upper Midwest 68 68.4 31.6 38.9 61.1 - 4.3 3.1
N. Orleans-Miss. 94 81. 5 18.5 54.4 45.6 -12.6 - 1. 0
Southwest Plains 106 67.2 32.8 31.2 68.8 6.0 11.4
Central Arkansas lOB 66.5 33.5 33.1 66.9 - 5.6 12.3
Texas 126 54.0 l.6.0 19.5 80.5 + 1.8 2B.2
Rio Grande Valley 138 73.5 26.5 14.B 85.2 - 9.5 22.1
Selected Orders 69.2 30.8 36.B 63.2 - 5.0 6.5
-0
Table 3. Number of Producers and Their Milk Marketings, By Selected Changes in Marketings Between the Base Period (1981/82) and 1983, Selected Federal Orders
Market.ings Federal Order Decrease of over 5.0% Change within +/- 5.0% Increase of 5.0% or greater
No. of Total mil k No. of % of all Milk No. of % of all Milk No. of % of all Mi 1 k Name No. ~roducers volUflle ~roducers ~roducers volume ~roducers ~roducers volume E!roducers ~roducers volulfle
mi I. I bs. mil. lbs. mi 1. lbs. mi I. Ibs.
New England 6,177 4,958.8 1,682 27.2 895.7 2,195 35.6 1,948.1 2,300 37.2 2,115.0
New York-New Jersey 2 16,097 11,331 .9 3,718 23.1 1,805.1 5,347 33.2 3,869.5 7,032 43.7 5,657.3
Georgia 7 1,394 1,699.5 531 38.1 558.5 369 26.5 525.0 494 35.4 616.0
Chicago Regional 30 16,449 12,267.5 4,104 25.0 2,547.6 6,765 41.1 5,237.8 5,580 33.9 4,482.1
Southern Michigan 40 5,663 4,621.3 1,326 23.4 763.0 ' 1,895 33.5 1,626.7 2,442 43.1 2,231.6
Indiana 49 2,338 1,614.3 577 24.7 321.5 651 27.8 480.5 1 ,110 47.5 812.3
St. Louis-Ozarks 62 3,480 2,586.6 867 24.9 506.2 1,080 31.0 852.5 1,533 44.1 1,227.9
Upper Midwest 68 13,178 8,694.6 3,337 25.3 1,871.6 5,213 39.6 3,603.3 4,628 35.1 3,219.7
N. Orleans-Miss. 94 1 ,231 1,269.6 613 49.8 527.4 261 21.2 323.5 357 29.0 418.7
Southwest Plains 106 1,294 1,198.3 434 33.5 302.2 369 28.5 385.3 491 38.0 510.8
Central Arkansas 108 707 532.6 226 32.0 135.3 175 24.7 137.8 306 43.3 259.5
Texas 126 2,230 3,409.1 486 21.8 521.7 511 22.9 750.6 1,233 55.3 2,136.8
Rio Grande Valley 138 115 884.8 27 23.5 70.2 31 26.9 285.3 57 49.6 529.3
Selected Orders 70,353 55,068.9 17,928 25.5 10,826.0 24,862 35.3 20,025 . 9 27,563 39.2 24,217.0
...... 0
Table 4. Number of Milk Diversion Program Participants and Their Milk Marketings, by Selected Changes in Marketings Between the Base Period (1981/82) and 1983, Selected Federal Orders
Marketings Federal Order Decrease of over 5.0% Change within +/- 5.0% Increase of 5.0% or greater
Volume of % of all % of all % of all No. of mi lk by No. of producers No. of producers No. of producers
partici- % of all partici- partici- decreasing Milk partici- changing Milk partici- increasing Milk Name No. ~ants ~roducers ~ants ~ants b): over 5% volume ~ants within +/-5% volume ~ants b): 5% or more volume
mi 1. lbs. mi 1. 1 bs. mi 1. lbs. mi 1. 1 bs.
New England 924 15.0 885.6 497 29.5 371.0 331 15.1 411.7 96 4.2 102.9
New York-New Jersey 2 1,553 9.6 1,175.9 872 23.5 528.9 500 9.4 452.1 181 2.6 194.9
Georgia 7 456 32.7 571.4 285 53.7 337.0 116 31.4 165.9 55 11. 1 68.5
Chicago Regional 30 2,446 14.9 1,840.9 1,229 29.9 823.6 946 14.0 788.4 271 4.9 228.9
Southern Michigan 40 995 17.6 828.8 472 35.6 307.4 373 19.7 370.0 150 6.1 151.4
Indiana 49 462 19.8 343.7 228 39.5 140.3 140 21.5 126.1 94 8.5 77 .3
St. Louis-Ozarks 62 1,235 35.S. 986.9 495 57.1 313.8 459 42.5 409.4 281 18.3 263.7
Upper Midwest 68 2,740 20.8 1,840.8 1,233 36.9 728.1 1,115 21.4 835.6 392 8.5 277 .1
N. Orleans-Miss. 94 339 27.S 360.1 240 39.2 220.4 64 24.5 86.2 3S 9.8 53.5
Southwest Plains 106 S74 44.4 S2S.1 293 67.S 215.8 172 46.6 188.4 109 22.2 120.9
Central Arkansas 108 269 38.0 200.4 138 61.1 81.9 69 39.4 60.0 62 20.3 58.S
Texas 126 817 36.6 1,214.0 323 66.S 362.0 221 43.2 348.2 273 22.1 503.8
Rio Grande Vall ey 138 34 29 .6 114 . 7 21 77 .8 59.6 8 25.8 31.9 5 8.8 23.2
Selected Orders 12,844 18.3 10,888.3 6,326 35.3 4,489.8 4,514 18.2 4,273.9 2,004 7.3 2,124.6
~
~
o
- 12 -
Texas, and Rio Grande Valley) signed diversion contracts. Approxima tely
one-third (or less) of the producers in this category in the nor t hern
marketing orders (New England, New York-New Jersey, Chicago Regional,
Southern Michigan, and Upper Midwest) participated in the program.
Approximately 25,000 producers (35 percent) had 1983 marketing levels
that were within 5 percentage points of their base-period marketings; less
than one-fifth of these producers (4,514) contracted under the diversion
program. The remaining 27,500 producers (39 percent) had increased t heir
1983 marketings 5.0% or more above their base period level. Only 2,004
producers (7 percent) in this group participated in the program.
Base Period Comparisons
Milk marketing changes by participants that occurred between the base
period (1981/82) and the 1984/85 diversion period are shown in Appendix II
tables. Over ninety percent of all participants decreased marketings in
each of the five quarters. (See Table 5.) The first quarter of . the milk
diversion program appeared to be one of major adjustment for most
participants. The percentage of participants decreasing marketings was 91
percent in that quarter of the program and then rose to more tha n 95
percent in the second quarter; it stayed at, or close to, that level for
the remainder of the program. The average percentage decrease in
marketings by participants was approximately 22 percent in the first
quarter; it then escalated to more than 27 percent, the general level for
the remainder of the program.
As shown in Table 6, the majority of pa!ticipants had marketing levels
which were at, . or below, their contract level during all quarters of the
diversion program. By the second quarter of the program 80 percent of
participants were reducing marketings by at least that percentage which
would fulfill their contracts. This proportion fell slightly in the third
and fourth quarters. During the fifth quarter of the program, 75 percent
of participants were reducing marketings at contract-fulfilling levels.
Over the cumulative fifteen months of the program (January 1,
1984-March 31, 1985), 93.6 percent of the participants reduced their
marketings sufficiently. This percentage, which is much higher than that
recorded in any of the individual quarters, shows that many participants
did not consistently satisfy their contract in all quarters. Instead , they
[
- 13 -
Table 5. Average Percentage Change in Marketings for MDP Participants and the Percentage of Participants Increasing or Decreasing Marketings From the Base Period to 1984/85, By Comparison Period, Combined Orders
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
Average Percentage Change for All Participants -21.7 -27.4 -28.5 -27.5 -27.9
Percentage of Farms
Increasing Marketings 8.9 4.4 4.8 6.0 4.7
Decreasing Marketings 91.1 95.6 95.2 94.0 95.3
All Participants 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Table 6. Participants' Actual Marketing Level Relative To Their Contract Level, by Comparison Period, Combined Orders
Actual Actual greater Actual less
Comparison than at t han Eeriod contract contract contract
Eercent of all EarticiEants
First Quarter 1984 34.9 29.7 35 . 4
Second Quarter 1984 19.8 24.3 55.9
Third Quarter 1984 22.0 20.2 57.8
Fourth Quarter 1984 26.4 18.8 54.8
Fifth Quarter 1984 24.9 17.6 57.5
lS-Month Cumulative 6.4 45.8 47.8
- 14 -
decreased their marketings beyond their contract levels in some quarters so
that they could have contract-ex ceeding levels in other quarters and still
satisfy their contracts.
An important point to note is that Federal Order data suggests that
6.4 percent of all participants were in violation of their contract. This
is not necessarily the case for the following reasons. Firstly, the
computer-generated statistical tables were initially designed so that any
producer with a marketing level exactly 3.000 percent greater than his
contract would be included in a category defined as "marketings 3 to 4
percent above contract level". Once the study was underway, it was not
possible to divide this group into those participants who were exactly
3.000 percent above contract and those who were over that amount but less
than 4.0 percent. Therefore, all participants in that category were
deemed, for study purposes, to be in violation of their contract. This was
not a significant ·problem during any of the quart~rly periods. For the
cumulative fifteen-month period, however, the +3 to +4 percent category
represented almost 2 percent of all participants and a sample analysis
showed that many of these producers were exactly 3.000 percent above their
contract level. Secondly, there is probably an error factor (involving two
to three percent of all participants) resulting from the fact that some . Orders used Federal order records to determine base period marketings and
these marketings did not agree with those reported on the . contract.
Additional errors could have occurred when ASCS contract information was
coordinated with Federal order data. Producers whose base-period
marketings used in the study were slightly off could have fallen ou tside
the tight contract-satisfying requirement. Furthermore, any
non-participant who was mistakenly identified as a participant would also
probably appear to be in violation of contract under ASCS guidelines.
A cursory estimate shows that probably only about 2 percent of all
participants were actually in violation of their contract under ASCS
guidelines.
There was a large group of non-participants who decreased their
marketings 5 percent or more during the fifteen months. If -these producers
had anticipated their declines, they could have participated i n the
program. Table 7 shows the number of qualifying non-participants
(non-participants with marketing declines of five percent or greater ) and
the total number of participants for those Federal Orders where da t a for
- 15 -
all study periods was available. Qualifying non-participants exceeded
total participants in each quarter. Numerically, they ranged from 17,612
in the first quarter to 22,837 in the third quarter. For the fifteen-month
cumulative period, there were 14,610 qualifying non-participants; they
exceeded the total number of participants by over 1,000 producers.
Although the number of non-participants with marketing decline s of
five percent or greater exceeded the total number of participants, this was
not necessarily the case for the orders on an individual basis. In many of
the northern orders (including New England, New York-New Jersey, Middle
Atlantic, Chicago Regional, and Southern Michigan), qualifying
non-participants did exceed total participants. In the more southern
orders (including Georgia, Florida, Southwest Plains, Central Arkansas,
Texas. and Central Arizona), however, total participants exceeded
qualifying non-participants.
In many Orders, non-participants lost out on substantial potential
income by not participating. Table 8 shows the number of qual ifying
non-participants and the MDP payments they would have received if they had
agreed to participate. For the Orders shown, 15,533 qual i f y ing
non-participants had 2.1 billion pounds of qualifying marketing dec l ines.
These farms would have received $211 million dollars if they had agreed to
participate. No marketing declines in addition to those actually incurred
would have been needed in order to receive this payment. While these farms
could have benefited had they signed up· for the program, the gove r nment
would have suffered in terms of higher program costs. Since the farms
under the Federal Orders shown in Table 8 represented slightly less than
one-half the milk marketed in the country during the IS-month MDP period,
it would be reasonable to assume that on a national basis, potential
additional program costs could have been 400-500 million dollars more than
what was actually spent.
Lost payments averaged $13,600 per farm and ranged from $10,215 in the
New York-New Jersey area to $141,809 per farm in the Florida Orders. On a
regional basis, non-participants in the three northeast Orders (Orders Nos.
1, 2, and 4) lost $72 million in potential income and non-participants in
two midwest Orders (Orders Nos. 30 and 68) lost $62 million.
Table 7. Number of Non-Participants With Marketing Declines of Five Percent or Greater From Base Period and Total Number of MDP Participants, By Comparison Period, Selected Federal Orders
Federal Order
Name No.
New England 1 New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlantic 4 Georgia 1 7 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Southern Michigan 40 Indiana 2 49 Kansas Cit.y, e t. al. Upper Mid~est Nashville
4 Sout.hwest. Plains Centr~l Arkansas Texas
68 98
106 108 126
Central Arizona 131
Selected Orders
1st Quarter January-March 1984
Non-Participants Participants
1,148 956 3,556 1,480 1,732 702
321 446 117 173
3,806 2,446 1,023 1,014
469 459 1,406 2,368 3,058 2,740
216 422 243 578 134 254 370 790
13 45
17,612 14,873
2nd Quarter April-June 1984
Non-Participants Participants
number
1,868 956 4,159 1,443 2,142 684
347 449 110 172
4,626 2,446 1,268 1,014
622 459 1,493 2,287 3,225 2,740
292 422 256 578 144 254 310 804
8 45
20,870 14,753
(Continued on next page)
3rd Quart.er July-Sept.ember 1984
Non-Participants Participants
2,046 956 4,249 1,405 2,166 667
454 461 106 173
5,027 2,446 1,385 1,014
685 459 1,613 2,245 3,975 2,740
295 422 261 578 183 254 362 812 30 45
22,837 14,677
....... 0'
Table 7. (Continued) Number of Non-Participants With Marketing Declines of Five Percent or Greater From Base Period and Total Number of MDP Participants, By Comparison Period, Selected Federal Orders
4th Quarter 5t.h Quarter 15-Month Cumulative Federal Order October-December 1984 Januar~-March 1985 January 1984-March 1985
Non- Non- Non-Name No. Participants Participants Participants Participants Participants Participants
number
New England 1,958 956 1,808 956 1,502 956 New York-New Jersey 2 4,302 1,368 4,126 1,334 3,107 1,310 Middle Atlantic II 1,958 668 1,620 659 1,455 658
Georgia. 1 7 539 452 287 379 289 362 SE. FlorIda, et al. 106 172 27 154 25 153 Chicago Regional 30 4,649 2,446 3,715 2,306 2,835 2,283 Southern Michigan 40 1,470 1,014 1,212 909 922 892 Indiana 2 49 678 462 4Ti 383 366 374 Kansas City, et al. 1,314 2,172 1,199 2,123 1,059 2,075 Upper Mid~est 68 3,760 2,740 3,256 2,540 2,404 2,535 Nashville 98 275 422 244 422 235 422
4 578 188 Southwest Plains 106 303 525 156 519
Centr~l Arkansas 108 177 269 112 250 98 245 Texas 126 479 821 244 696 148 713 Central Arizona 131 19 45 12 45 9 45
Selected Orders 21,987 14,585 18,527 13,681 14,610 13 ,542
Data for Florida producers in the following orders: Southeastern Florida (13); Tampa Bay (12); and Upper Florida (6). 2 Data for producers in the following orders: Greater Kansas City (64); Nebraska-Western Iowa (65); Black Hills (75); Eastern South Dakota (76);
and Iowa (79). 3 Data for Kentucky and Tennessee producers in the following orders: Tennessee Valley (#11); louisville-lexington-Evansville (#46); and
Nashville (#98). 4 Exc ludes data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the order .
..... -....J
- 18 -
Table 8. Number of Non-Participants with Marketing Declines of 5 Percent or Greater and the MOP PaYI!lents They Would Have Received, Selected Orders
Federal Order Marketing MOP Payments Name No. Farms declines Total Per farm
number mil. lbs. mil. dol. dollars
New England 1 1,502 203.0 20.3 13,516 New York-New Jersey 2 3,107 317.4 31.7 10,215 Middle Atlantic 4 1,455 200.8 20.1 13,798 Georgia 1 7 289 68.8 6.9 23,810 SEe Florida, et al. 25 35.4 3.5 141,809 Chicago Regional 30 2,835 357.8 35.8 12,622 Southern Michigan 40 922 100.9 10.1 10,941 Indiana 2 49 366 48.4 4.8 13,227 St. Louis-Ozarks 62 496 66.1 6.6 13,317 Greater Kansas City 64 202 32.0 3.2 15,820 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 264 46.7 4.7 17,690 Upper Midwest 68 2,404 267.1 26.7 11,109 Black Hills 75 20 4.2 0.4 20,764 E. South Dakota 76 61 7.9 0.8 13,010 Iowa 3 79 512 67.0 6.7 13,084 Nashville
4 98 235 32.4 3.2 13,780 Southwest Plains 106 156 24.9 2.5 15,958 Central Arkansas 108 98 14.0 1.4 14,303 Oregon-Washington 124 153 56.6 5.7 37,022 Puget 4Sound-Inland 125 237 93.9 9.4 39,624 Texas 126 148 39.4 3.9 26,681 Central Arizona 131 9 6.7 0.7 74 ,435 SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135 37 21.0 2.1 56 ,744
Selected Orders 15,533 2,112.4 211. 2 13,600
1 Data for Florida producers in the following orders: . Southeastern Florida (13); Tampa Bay (12); and Upper Florida (6).
2 Data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the following or ders: Southern Illinois (32); St. Louis-Ozarks (62); Central Illinois (50); Paducah (99); Southwest Plains (106); and Texas (126). Excludes data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the Chicago Regional Orde r (30) and Greater Kansas City Order (64).
3 Data for Kentucky and Tennessee producers in the following orders: Tennessee Valley (#11); Louisville-Lexington-Evansville (#46) ; and Nashville (1198).
4 Excludes data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the order.
- 19 -
Previous-Year Comparisons
Comparisons were made -between each quarter of the program and the same
quarter one year earlier. MDP participants decreased marketings an average
of 19.0 percent between the first quarter of 1983 and the first quarter of
1984. (See Table 9 and tables in Appendix III.) The decrease escalated in
the next two quarters to 23.9 and 24.7 percent, respectively. It fe l l to
21.6 percent in the fourth quarter and then plummeted to 9.1 percent i n the
final quarter. The fifth-quarter decrease was low because this final
quarter (January-March 1985) was being compared with the same quarter a
year earlier (January-March 1984), a quarter in which participants had
already attained significant decreases in marketings.
A fifteen-month cumulative comparison using previous-year time periods
was not done because of overlapping quarters. That is, marketings i n the
first quarter of 1984 would have been used as both a current time period
and a previous-year time period; this would have effectively eliminated
that quarter's marketings from the analysis.
Table 9 also shows the participants' average percentage change in
marketings between the base period and the diversion program period.
Except for the fifth quarter, declines from the base period were three to
six percentage points larger than the corresponding quarterly declines from
1983. This reflects the fact that participants had reduced marketings
after the base period but before the MDP began.
Marketing changes for non-participants during each MDP quarter
compared to the same quarter in the previous year are shown in Table 10.
In all quarterly periods but the first, the majority of non-participants
were decreasing marketings. The non-participants with decreases incurred
an average decrease of nearly l3 percent in each of the five quar ters.
Non-participants who increased marketings did so at a rate of 16 percent
during the first quarter and approximately 14 percent in the succeeding
four quarters.
The entire group of non-participants increased their marketings by an
average of 4.1 and 1.0 percent, respectively, during the first two
quarters. Their marketings change was reversed during the third and f ourth
quarters when they registered decrea.ses of 0.4 and 0.1 pe r cent,
respectively. In the fifth quarter, an increase of 0.6 percent was
recorded.
u
- 20 -
Table 9. Average Percentage Change in Marketings for MDP Participants From the Base Period to 1984/85 and From 1983/84 to 1984/85, By Comparison Period, Combined Orders
Comparison Period Base Period-1984/85 1983/1984-1984/85
First Quarter 1984
Second Quarter 1984
Third Quarter 1984
Fourth Quarter 1984
First Quarter 1985
IS-Month Cumulative
-21. 7
-27.4
-28.5
-27.5
-27.9
-25.8
percentage change
-19.0
-23.9
-24.7
-21.6
- 9.1
N.A.
Table 10. Non-Participants Increasing and Decreasing Marketings and Their Average Percentage Change in Marketings Between 1983/84 and 1984/85, by Comparison Period, Combined Orders
Percent of farms Percent change in marke tings Comparison Period Increasing Decreasing Increasing Decreasing All
First Quarter 1984 57.1 42.9 16.1 -12.5 4.1
Second Quarter 1984 49.9 50.1 14.6 -13.3 1.0
Third Quarter 1984 45.6 54.4 14.6 -13.9 -0.4
Fourth Quarter 1984 47.2 52.8 13.9 -13.8 -0.1
First Quarter 1985 49.2 50.8 13.7 -12.9 0.6
Second Quarter 1985* 61.0 39.0 15.7 -12.9 4.3
* Orders for which data was available are listed in Appendix Table IV-7.
- 21 -
Table 11 compares non-participants with marketing declines to all
participants. In most comparison periods, "decreasing" non-participants
outnumbered total participants by more than a two-to-one ratio. However,
MDP participants decreased marketings to a much greater degree than
non-participants in the first four quarters of the program (e.g., 19.0
percent for participants in the first quarter relative to only 12.5 percent
for non-participants). Once again, due to the overlapping quarters of the
MDP, participants only decreased 9.1 percent in the last quarter o f the
program (January-March 1985) relative to the first quarter (January-March
1984) . This change was less than that incurred by "decreasing"
non-participants.
The decreasing group of non-participants accounted for actual volume
declines in marketings that were greater than the volume declines for
participants in all five quarters. During the first quarter of 1985,
"decreasing" non-participants accounted for a reduction of almost one
billion pounds in marketings compared with the first quarter of 1984. All
participants reduced marketings by less than 300 million pounds during the
January-March 1985 quarter.
Post-MOP
Preliminary data for the first quarter of the post-diversion period
(April-June 1985) indicates that most MOP participants began to increase
marketings after the program ended. However, about one-third of the
participants continued at, or below, the level they originally contracted
for; these participants tended to be smaller-volume producers as they
represented only about one-quarter of the milk involved.
The preliminary April-June 1985 information, available from Federal
Orders representing more than 70,000 producers, is shown in Appendix Tables
11-8, 111-7, and IV-7.
As seen in Appendix Table 11-8, 23.1 percent of participants re t urned
their marketings to levels above their pre-program (base-period) volumes in
the second quarter of 1985. The average increase above the base-period
volume was 14.4 percent for this group. The ' remaining participants
continued their marketing at levels which averaged 23.8 percent below their
base-period volumes. As a group, the volume of milk marketed by all
participants in the second quarter was 15.7 percent below base-period
levels.
- 22 -
Table 1l. .Marketing Changes From 1983/84 to 1984/85 for All MDP Participants and for Selected Non-Participants, By Comparison Period, Combined Orders
All MDP Part.icieants Selp.cted Non-Particieant.s* Number of 1983/84-1984/85 change NUlT'ber of 1983/84-1984/85 change
Comearison Period farms Mil. 1 bs. Percent farms Mi 1. 1 bs. Percent
Jan-Mar '84 (1st Qtr.) 18,473 818 -19.0 35,623 819 -12.5
Apr-Jun '84 (2nd Qtr.) 18,391 1,038 -23.9 42,053 1,084 -13 .3
Jul-Sep '84 (3rd Qtr . ) 18,341 986 -24.7 45,608 1 ,152 -13.9
Oct-Dec '84 (4th Qtr.) 18,179 814 -21.6 43,425 1,070 -13.8
Jan-Mar '85 (5th Qtr.) 16,607 289 - 9.1 39,205 979 -12.9
* Non-participants with 1983/84-1984/85 marketing decreases.
- 23 -
When compared with the same quarter in 1984, MDP participants
increased their marketings significantly during the second quarter of 1985.
As seen in Appendix Table 111-7, almost three-fourths of all participants
had marketings above last year's levels. The average increase for this
group was 26.6 percent. The remaining participants decreased marketings an
average of 16.9 percent. As a group, all participants incurred an average
increase of 15.1 percent.
Non-participants also increased their marketings in the second quarter
of 1985 relative to the previous year. For the group as a whole , the
increase was 4.3 percent. As seen in Table 10 and Appendix Table 1V-7, 61
percent of all non-participants increased marketings while 39 percent
decreased. This was a shift from the previous four quarters when the
majority of non-participants were decreasing their marketings.
Although participants played a major role in the year-to-year increase
in marketings reported for the second quarter of 1985, non-participants
played an equally important role. The non-participants increased
marketings by 488 million pounds whereas the participants increased
marketings 338 million pounds.
APPENDIX I
Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings
and Previous Period Marketings
[
The tables in this Appendix contain data from the following Federal Orders unless otherwise indicated.
Federal Order Name No.
New England 1 New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlantic 4 Georgia 1 7 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33 E. Ohio-W. Penn. 36 Southern Michigan 40 Indiana 2 49 St. Louis-Ozarks 62 Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest 68 Black Hills 75 E. South Dakota 76 Iowa 79 New Orlea~s-Miss. 94 Nashville 4 98 Southwest Plains 106 Central Arkansas 108 Oregon-Washington 124 Puget
4Sound-Inland 125
Texas 126 Central Arizona 131 SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135 Colorado 137 Rio Grande Valley 138
1 Data for Florida producers in the following orders: Southeastern Florida (13); Tampa Bay (12); and Upper Florida (6).
2 Data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the following orders : Southern Illinois (32); St. Louis-Ozarks (62); Central Illinois (50) ; Paducah (99); Southwest Plains (106); and Texas (126). Excludes data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the Chicago Regional Order (30) and Greater Kansas City Order (64).
3 Data for Kentucky and Tennessee producers in the following orders : Tennessee Valley (#11); Louisville-Lexington-Evansville (#46); and Nashville (1198).
4 Excludes data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the order.
Table I-IA. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings
Current Time Period: January-March 1984 Previous Time Period: January-March 1981/82 Base Period Diversion Program Status: Participants
[ Percentage Difference Current
Greater than Less period or eg,ual to than Farms marketings*
number mil. lbs.
50 214 50.4 25 50 175 40.5
[ 20 25 67 i3.7 15 20 137 26.3 12 15 119 25.S 10 12 93 20.2 9 10 47 12.9 8 9 56 14.5 7 8 52 13.0 6 7 65 17.2 5 6 78 17.9 4 5 79 15.3 3 4 89 18.7 2 3 123 29.2 1 2 145 32;0 0 1 130 29.6
Subtotal 1,669 376.9
- 1 0 126 27.7 - 2 - 1 153 40.9 - 3 - 2 167 42.8 - 4 - 3 217 57.1 - 5 - 4 182 43.4 - 6 - 5 275 60.1 - 7 - 6 249 59.1 - 8 - 7 305 74.7 - 9 - 8 316 77.7 -10 - 9 370 93.1 -12 -10 793 188.3 -15 -12 1,297 304.4 -20 -15 2,301 528.6 -30 -20 5,044 960.4
-30 5,333 657.8
Subtotal 17,128 3,216.1
TOTAL 18,797 3,593.0
* Totals may not add due t.o rounding.
[
Table I-lB. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings
Current Time Period: January-March 1984 Previous Time Period: January-March 1981/82 Base Period Diversion Program Status: Participants Adjusted by Contract
Percentage Difference Current Greater than Less period or esual to than Farms marketings*
number mil. lbs.
50 230 64.4 25 50 709 171. 0 20 25 442 100.7 15 . 20 651 157.4
·12 15 600 149.4 10 12 470 118.9
9 10 264 60.2 8 9 299 75.0 7 8 290 65.5 6 7 349 88.5 5 6 342 74.6 4 5 348 79.1 3 4 369 93.2 2 3 947 206.7 1 2 756 176.3 0 1 698 150.8
Subtotal 7,764 1,831. 6
- 1 0 846 172.3 - 2 - 1 684 137.0 - 3 - 2 632 124.8 - 4 - 3 507 102.4 - 5 - 4 444 80.9 - 6 - 5 378 64.2 - 7 - 6 356 57.9 - 8 - 7 312 53.7 - 9 - 8 265 42.8 -10 - 9 256 40.2 -12 -10 456 63.7 -15 -12 506 67.8 -20 -15 529 62.4 -30 -20 626 58.9
-30 814 33.9
Subtotal 7,611 1,163.0
TOTAL 15,375 2,994.5
§ Data from Federal Orders Nos. 4, 64, 65, 75, 76, 79, and 137 not included.
* Totals may not add due to rounding.
·[ Table I-IC.
[
[
Number of Farms and Milk Harketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Harketings
Current Time Period: January-March 1984 Previous Time Period: January-March 1981/82 Base Period Diversion Program Status: Non-Participants
Percentage Difference Current Greater than Less period or egual to than Farms marketings*
number mil. lbs.
50 5,059 1,154.1 25 50 8,663 2,025.7 20 25 3,693 874 . 1 15 20 4,783 1,136.0 12 15 3,344 781. 7 10 12 2,418 559.7
9 10 1,263 290.8 8 9 1,242 284.2 7 8 1,381 307.9 6 7 1,298 275.2 5 6 1,374 317.4 4 5 1,341 294.6 3 4 1,413 292.7 2 3 1,395 306.9 1 2 1,311 . 273.7 0 1 1,316 275.4
Subtotal 41,294 9,450.2
- 1 0 1,299 269.0 - 2 - 1 1,250 250.8 - 3 - 2 1,250 253.9 - 4 - 3 1,204 232.2 - 5 - 4 1,162 220.4 - 6 - 5 1,156 217.0 - 7 - 6 1,077 185.2 - 8 - 7 1,029 180.8 - 9 - 8 953 166.6 -10 - 9 961 160.9 -12 -10 1,607 267.3 -15 -12 2,179 337.8 -20 -15 2,618 373.7 -30 -20 3,109 381. 9
-30 5,478 265.3
Subtotal 26,332 3,763.0
TOTAL 67,626 13,213.0
§ Data from Federal Orders Nos. 33, 36, 62, 124, 125, 135, and 137 not included.
* Totals may not add due to rounding.
Table I-lD.
[
[
[
Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings Previous Period Marketings
Current Time Period: January-March 1984 Previous Time Period: January-March 1983 Diversion Program Status: Participants
Percentage Difference Current Greater than Less period or eg,ual to than Farms marketinBs*
number mil. Ibs.
50 167 28.1 25 50 258 52.3 20 25 126 20.0 15 20 204 37.3 12 15 177 29.6 10 12 170 35.4
9 10 93 15.5 8 9 90 17.4 7 8 115 29.4 6 7 95 18.6 5 6 133 27.7 4 5 143 30.1 3 4 126 29.8 2 3 157 37.9 1 2 167 36.4 0 1 199 47.8
.Subtotal 2,420 493.5
- 1 0 202 41.6 - 2 - 1 236 55.7 - 3 - 2 272 66.2 - 4 - 3 281 55.4 - 5 - 4 304 72.2 - 6 - 5 322 64.0 - 7 - 6 309 68.7 - 8 - 7 347 64.4 - 9 - 8 373 104.5 -10 - 9 399 82.7 -12 -10 864 187.2 -15 -12 1,359 306.9 -20 -15 2,385 498.5 -30 -20 4,253 810.3
-30 4,147 514.1
Subtotal 16,053 2,992.2
TOTAL 18,473 3,485.7
§ Data from Federal Order No. 131 not included. * Totals may not add due to rounding.
the and
[
[
[
Table I-lE. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings Previous Period Marketings
Current Time Period: january-March 1984 Previous Time Period: January-March 1983 Diversion Program Status: Non-Participants
Percenta~e Difference Current Greater than Less period or eg,ual to than Farms marketin~s*
number mil. lbs.
50 3,372 654.7 25 50 7,820 1,594.1 20 25 4,008 909.8 15 20 5,497 1,253.3 12 15 4,223 986.8 10 12 3,281 757.0
9 10 1,719 421. 2 8 9 1,839 429.8 7 8 1,841 446.5 6 7 1,935 448.7 5 6 1,928 446.8 4 5 1,984 461.0 3 4 1,960 452.2 2 3 2,037 460.3 1 2 2,079 469.7 0 1 1,986 444.8
Subtotal 47,509 10,636.6
- 1 0 2,078 451. 7 - 2 - 1 2,025 422.2 - 3 -" 2 1,894 415.8 - 4 - 3 1,852 384.3 - 5 - 4 1,782 368.6 - 6 - 5 1,781 367.0 - 7 - 6 1,586 320.6 - 8 - 7 1,464 276.2 - 9 - 8 1,480 284.6 -10 - 9 1,354 240.4 -12 -10 2,421 416.5 -15 -12 2,949 486.2 -20 -15 3,544 524.8 -30 -20 3,721 494.2
-30 5,692 278.3
Subtotal 35,623 5,731.2
TOTAL 83,132 16,367.8
§ Data from Federal Order No. 131 not included. * Totals may not add due to rounding.
the and
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
Table 1-2B. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings
Current Time Period: Previous Time Period: Diversion Program Status:
Percenta8e Difference Greater than Less or eg,ual to than
50 25 50 20 25 15 20 12 15 10 12
9 10 8 9 7 8 6 7 5 6 4 5 3 4 2 3 1 2 0 1
Subtotal
- 1 0 - 2 - 1 - 3 - 2 - 4 - 3 - 5 - 4 - 6 - 5 - 7 - 6 - 8 - 7 - 9 - 8 -10 - 9 -12 -10 -15 -12 -20 -15 -30 -20
-30
Subtotal
TOTAL
April-June 1984 April-June 1981/82 Base Period Participants Adjusted by Contract
Current period
Farms marketings* number mil. lbs.
125 49.5 320 83.7 173 38.8 286 61.1 270 62.8 266 66.9 143 33.0 163 27.8 201 44.3 225 46.7 233 51.9 282 68.3 347 84.8 554 123.6 556 127.4 575 113.8
4,719 1,084.4
710 139.6 701 148.3 6"41 152.4 660 129.5 641 128.9 573 116.6 565 110.6 501 94.0 506 93.7 443 76.5 786 130.4 935 153.1 952 132.2 876 94.9
1,155 40.0
10,645 1,740.8
15,364 2,825.2
§ Data from Federal Order No. 137 not included.
* Totals may not add due to rounding.
[
Table I-2C. Number of Farms and Milk ~~rketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings
Current Time Period: April-June 1984 Previous Time Period: April-June 1981/82 Base Period Diversion Program Status: Non-Participants
Percentage Difference Current Greater than Less period or egual to than Farms marketings*
number mil. lbs.
50 3,854 1,072.4 25 50 7,052 1,705.6 20 25 3,145 796.1 15 20 4,246 1,024.6 12 15 3,092 731. 6 10 12 2,308 568.3 9 10 1,250 301.0 8 9 1,286 287.3 7 8 1,277 303.0 6 7 1,356 303.3 5 6 1,399 315.9 4 5 1,402 327.1 3 4 1,438 310.3 2 3 1,412 320.2 1 2 1,380 304.0 0 1 1,457 303.2
Subtotal 37,354 8,973.7
- 1 0 1,413 308.1 - 2 - 1 1,408 294.0 - 3 - 2 1,381 287.9 - 4 - 3 1,301 254.5 - 5 - 4 1,291 261.3 - 6 - 5 1,271 258.2 - 7 - 6 1,219 239.0 - 8 - 7 1,114 202.5 - 9 - 8 1,164 216.8 -10 - 9 998 185.0 -12 -10 1,912 326.9 -15 -12 2,426 416.9 -20 -15 3,151 476.6 -30 -20 3,615 494.0
-30 6,975 324.3
Subtotal 30,639 4,546.1
TOTAL 67,993 13,519.7
§ Data from Federal Orders Nos. 33, 36, 62, 124, 125, 135, and 137 not included.
* Totals may not add due to rounding.
[
Table 1-2D. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings
Current Time Period: April-June 1984 Previous Time Period: April-June 1983 Diversion Program Status: Participants
Percentage Difference Current Greater than Less period or egual to than Farms marketings*
number mil. lbs.
50 150 35.9 25 50 187 39.3 20 25 70 14.6 15 20 122 22.2 12 15 103 19.2 10 12 95 15.1 9 10 53 9.2 8 9 6.2 11.0 7 8 71 12.9 6 7 77 15.1 5 6 83 18.2 4 5 88 16.8 3 4 105 23.9 2 3 107 22.6 1 2 124 30.6 0 1 162 30.9
Subtotal 1,659 337.6
- 1 0 149 29.7 - 2 - 1 152 31.9 - 3 - 2 193 35.5 - 4 - 3 174 Zi1.6 - 5 - 4 195 31.6 - 6 - 5 231 51.8 - 7 - 6 254 50.3 - 8 - 7 311 71.0 - 9 - 8 272 57.6 -10 - 9 293 62.3 -12 -10 678 138.7 -15 -12 1,178 236.6 -20 -15 2,057 400.9 -30 -20 4,498 868.0
-30 6,097 849.5
Subtotal 16,732 2,966.8
TOTAL 18,391 3,304.4
§ Data from Federal Order No. 131 not included.
* Totals may not add due to rounding.
[
0 Table I-2E. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and
[ Previous Period Marketings
Current Time Period: April-June 1984 Previous Time Period: April-June 1983
[ Diversion Program Status: Non-Participants
[ Percentage Difference Current
Greater than Less period or egual to than Farms marketings*
number mil. lbs.
[ 50 2,330 567.1 25 50 5,699 1,267.6 20 25 3,102 714.0 15 20 4,697 1,086.3 12 15 3,659 876.8 10 12 3.,012 723.5 9 10 1> 577 374.6 8 9 1> 730 413.0 7 8 1,768 430.8
[ 6 7 1,808 423.5 5 6 1,983 481. 1 4 5 2,023 460.8 3 4 2,095 490.0
[ 2 3 2,104 485.1 1 2 2,156 529.8 0 1 2,086 513.7
[ Subtotal 41,829 '9,837.6
[ - 1 0 2,118 482.4 - 2 - 1 2,108 475.8 - 3 - 2 2,209 513.7 - 4 - 3 2,072 452.7 - 5 - 4 2,011 444.6 - 6 - 5 1,932 410.2 - 7 - 6 1,867 387.5
[ - 8 - 7 1. 747 357.8 - 9 - 8 1,739 350.1 -10 - 9 1,574 303.6 -12 -10 2,833 548.3
[ -15 -12 3,504 624.1 -20 -15 4,232 702.4 -30 -20 4,518 641.0
[ -30 7,589 374.6
Subtotal 42,053 7,068.9
[ TOTAL 83,882 16,906.5
[ § Data from Federal Order No. 131 not included. * Totals may not add due to rounding.
[
Table 1-3A. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings
Current Time Period: Previous Time Period: Diversion Program Status:
Percentage Difference Greater than Less or equal to than
50 25 20 15 12 10
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o
Subtotal
- 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30
Subtotal
TOTAL
50 25 20 15 12 10
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
o - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30
July-September 1984 July-September 1981/82 Base Period Participants
Farms number
119 109
55 65 54 41 37 31 36 40 31 38 50 60 55 76
897
89 99
115 125 126 166 168 191 204 207 535 845
1,740 4,690 8,412
17,712
18,609
Current period
marketings* mil. lbs.
28.7 26.4 9.9
12.4 9.4 6.0 9.2 5.5 4.9
10.0 6.1 7.8 8.3
10.5 14.1 14.3
183.6
18.4 17.0 19.3 26.9 24.8 31.3 34.8 35.7 42.8 39.0
130.9 172.4 349.7 866.6
1,088.4
2,898.1
3,081.6
* Totals may not add due to rounding.
[
[
[
[
Table 1-3B. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings
Current Time Period: Previous Time Period: Diversion Program Status:
Percentage Difference Greater than Less or equal to than
50 25 20 15 12 10
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o
Subtotal
- 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30
Subtotal
TOTAL
50 25 20 15 12 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
o - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30
July-September 1984 July-September 1981/82 Base Period Participants Adjusted by Contract
Farms number
130 336 218 341 334 292 197 209 206 . 242 291 350 383 558 491 5ll
5,089
587 519 569 525 529 473 494 465 458 442 797 973
1,176 1,264 1,652
10,923
16,012
Current period
marketings* mil. lbs.
40.5 60.3 39.8 65.0 59.0 50.5 52.2 47.7 37.4 51.5 56.6 76.7 74.5
104.0 94.0
108.0
1,017.8
ll1.3 106.2 109.2 ll5.6 105.0 89.1 92.4 87.3 85.6 84.3
140.8 161. 2 158.7 140.0 65.0
1,651.6
2,669.4
§ Data from Federal Orders Nos. 64, 65, 75, 76, 79, and 137 not included.
* Totals may not add due to rounding.
[
[
Table 1-3C. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings
Current Time Period: July-September 1984 Previous Time Period: July-September 1981/82 Base Period Diversion Program Status: Non-Participants
Percentage Difference Greater than Less or equal to than
50 25 20 15 12 10
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o
Subtotal
1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30
Subtotal
TOTAL
50 25 20 15 12 10
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
o - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30
Farms number
3,825 7,179 3,250 4,069 2,946 2,134 1,140 1,160 1,256 1,199 1,253 1,242 1,296 1,333 1,409 1,364
36,055
1,273 1,267 1,246 1,235 1,209 1,217 1,166 1,164 1,154 1,075 1,977 2,598 3,390 3,966 8,230
32,167
68,222
Current period
marketings* mil. lbs.
910.5 1,653.2
747.3 938.8 641. 2 470.9 257.0 254.6 283.4 258.3 297.9 266.8 277 .8 271. 8 285.8 276.0
8,091. 0
264.8 254.7 250.7 243.9 232.7 220.2 215.9 211. 6 200.4 183.3 324.7 404.9 503.5 508.1 363.9
4,383.4
12,474.4
§ Data from Federal Orders Nos. 33, 36, 62, 124, 125, 135, and 137 not included.
* Totals may not add due to rounding.
Table I-3D.
[
Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings Previous Period Marketings
Current Time Period: July-September 1984 Previous Time Period: July-September 1983 Diversion Program Status: Participants
Percentage Difference Current Greater than Less period or e9.ual to than Farms marketings*
number miL lbs.
50 168 29.4 25 50 201 37.5 20 25 91 14.1 15 20 141 24.9 12 15 121 18.1 10 12 121 18.2 9 10 57 8.4 8 9 56 8.6 7 8 88 16.3 6 7 80 13.2 5 6 99 20.1 4 5 96 17.3 3 4 105 19.4 2 3 100 21.1 1 2 124 21.0 0 1 149 26.2
Subtotal 1,797 313.9
- 1 0 152 26.9 - 2 - 1 148 26.7 - 3 - 2 176 30.5 - 4 - 3 198 33.4 - 5 - 4 224 41.4 - 6 - 5 229 44.4 - 7 - 6 251 55.0
8 7 261 50.6 - 9 - 8 291 58.7 -10 - 9 295 79.8 -12 -10 629 120.8 -15 -12 1,089 211. 7 -20 -15 1,901 348.5 -30 -20 4,193 746.5
-30 6,507 816.2
Subtotal 16,544 2,691. 2
TOTAL 18,341 3,005.1
§ Data from Federal Order No. 131 not included. * Totals may not add due to rounding.
the and
L [ Table 1-3E. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the
Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings
[ Current Time Period: July-September 1984 Previous Time Period: July-September 1983
[ Diversion Program Status: Non-Participants
Percentage Difference Current
[ Greater than Less period or eg,ual to than Farms marketings*
number mil. lbs.
50 2,157 480.0 25 50 5,415 1,162.2 20 25 2,894 617.0
[ 15 20 4,156 920.3 12 15 3,324 725.3 10 12 2,679 631. 6
[ 9 10 1,502 346.1 8 9 1,520 354.7 7 8 1,617 372 .1
[ 6 7 1,688 395.3 5 6 1,739 391. 2 4 5 1,869 431.3 3 4 1,875 423.6
[ 2 3 1,902 443.8 1 2 2,023 442.3 0 1 1,927 450.5
[ Subtotal 38,287 8,587.3
1 0 2,033 446.2
[ - 2 - 1 2,062 455.1 - 3 - 2 2,037 444.3 - 4 - 3 2,079 451.2
[ - 5 - 4 2,004 395.9 - 6 - 5 2,031 405.9 - 7 - 6 1,898 364.5 - 8 - 7 1,853 354.4
[ 9 8 1,772 336.5 -10 - 9 1,614 305.9 -12 -10 3,123 560.7 ,... , -15 -12 3,940 671. 2 -20 -15 4,890 778.9 -30 -20 5,265 721.3
-30 9,007 443.6
[ Subtotal 45,608 7,135.4
l TOTAL 83,895 15,722.8
§ Data from Federal Order No. 131 not included. r * Totals may not add due to rounding.
l
r
r L Table 1-4A. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders), by the
Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and
r Previous Period Marketings
l Current Time Period: October-December 1984
r Previous Time Period: October-December 1981/82 Base Period
Diversion Program Status: Participants
[ Percentage Difference Current Greater than Less period
r or eg,ual to than Farms marketings* number mil. lbs.
50 95 24.0
[ 25 50 120 24.4 20 25 44 10.9 15 20 77 15.9
[ 12 15 70 12.1 10 12 56 9.6
9 10 33 10.0 8 9 43 6.5
[ 7 8 43 6.4 6 7 48 9.3 5 6 52 9.6
[ 4 5 59 11.4 3 4 66 13.5 2 3 83 20.8 1 2 86 16.9
[ 0 1 122 28.8 .
Subtotal 1,097 230.2
[ - 1 0 99 17.2 - 2 - 1 III 21.6 - 3 - 2 117 24.3
[ - 4 - 3 146 30.0 - 5 - 4 172 30.5 - 6 - 5 177 37.2
[ - 7 - 6 190 37.2 - 8 - 7 211 46.6
9 8 215 45.8
[ -10 - 9 224 46.6 -12 -10 539 109.3 -15 -12 887 172.3 -20 -15 1,756 342.2
[ -30 -20 4,443 848.5 -30 8,019 991. 1
l Subtotal 17,306 2,800.3
TOTAL 18,403 3,030.5
[ * Totals may not add due to rounding.
r
r-
l
-[ Table 1-4B.
[
[
[
[
[
r. r· ~
[
[
[
r [
[
[
[
[
r
Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings
Current Time Period: October-December 1984 Previous Time Period: October-December 1981/82 Base
Period Diversion Program Status: Participants Adjusted by Contract
Percentage Difference Greater than Less or equal to than .
50 25 20 15 12 10
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o
Subtotal
- 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30
Subtotal
TOTAL
50 25 20 15 12 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
o - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30
Current period
Farms marketings* number mil. lbs.
170 44.0 493 90.4 290 48.3 553 92.9 496 97.7 451 83.0 268 55.4 279 51.0 258 53.7 367 80.6 364 71.2 359 66.1 415 82.6 532 101. 4 548 99.2 571 117.2
6,414 1,234.9
587 109.2 579 110.8 574 132.2 538 105.0 573 115.0 541 98.1 502 96.4 489 81.0 480 94.9 448 72.9 813 130.9
1,009 159.0 1.236 174.6 1,370 153.0 1,898 70.0
11,637 1,703.3
18,051 2,938.2
§ Data from Federal Order No. 137 not included. * Totals may not add due to rounding.
I 'I
-[ Table 1-4C. §
the Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders ), by Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings
[ Current Time Period: October-December 1984 Previous Time Period: October-December 1981/82 Base
[ Period
Diversion Program Status: Non-Participants
[ Percentage Difference Current Greater than Less period or eg,ual to than Farms marketings*
[ number mil. lbs.
50 4,046 1,008.8 25 50 8,064 1,946.0
[ 20 25 3,581 857.4 15 20 4,714 1,126.1 12 15 3,189 754.1
[ 10 12 2,435 579.9 9 10 1,269 291.2 8 9 1,259 293.8 7 8 1,224 268.0
[ 6 7 1,318 294.8 5 6 1,368 315.9 4 5 1,423 323.9
[ 3 4 1,381 323.2 2 3 1,365 316.1 1 2 1,341 295.9 0 1 1.,367 278.9
[ Subtotal 39,344 9,274.1
[ - 1 0 1,351 282.9 - 2 - 1 1,365 288.7 - 3 - 2 1,282 276.4
[ - 4 - 3 1.,277 243.4 - 5 - 4 1,223 236.6 - 6 - 5 1,194 233.0 - 7 - 6 1,152 212.6
l - 8 - 7 1,132 206.3 - 9 - 8 1,101 185;7 -10 - 9 1,105 187.4
[ -12 -10 1,882 325.7 -15 -12 2,454 373.6 -20 -15 3,187 483.5 -30 -20 3,876 477.5
l -30 7,810 370.8
Subtotal 31,391 4,384.2
r TOTAL 70,735 13,658.3 l
[ § Data from Federal Orders Nos. 33, 36, and 137 not included.
* Totals may not add due to rounding.
l I I -
[
L [
[
r L
[
[
[
[
l [
[
l [
[
r [ r L
Table 1-4D. Number of Farms and Nilk Narketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings
Current Time Period: October-December 1984 Previous Time Period: October-December 1983 Diversion Program Status: Participants
Percentage Difference Greater than Less or equal to than
50 25 20 15 12 10
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o
Subtotal
- 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30
Subtotal
TOTAL
50 25 20 15 12 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
o - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30
Farms number
213 299 133 209 158 127
91 99 83
105 117 114 132 145 154 156
2,335
198 190 221 219 256 265 283 305 291 299 651
1,100 1.978 3,809 5,779
15,844
18,179
Current period
marketings* mil. lbs.
37.9 51.2 22.0 37.0 30.2 26.8 15.5 15.7 14.7 18.9 20.8 19.2 21.8 28.4 29.9 31.0
420.8
38.6 42.1 44.1 40.6 48.5 48.9 55.1 57.4 54.5 62.2
122.5 209.0 381.1 668.6 660.4
2,533.6
2,954.4
§ Data from Federal Order No. 131 not included. * Totals may not add due to rounding.
I '\ •
.----.. -- -. ------ '-- ~ ---. - - . .. . r-
L r L
Table 1-4E. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the
[ Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings
[ Current Time Period: October-December 1984 Previous Time Period: October-December 1983 Diversion Program Status: Non-Participants
r l Percentage Difference Current
Greater than Less period r or eg,ual to than Farms marketings*
l number mil. lbs.
[ 50 2,078 429.2 25 50 5,308 1,106.4 20 25 2,789 592.1 15 20 4,256 951. 8
r 12 15 3,439 762.8 10 12 2,745 633.0
9 10 1,473 340.9
[ 8 9 1,610 380.8 7 8 1,710 419.6 6 7 1,780 414.8 5 6 1,778 421.0
[ 4 5 1,847 415.2 3 4 1,883 454.0 2 3 2,051 477 .1
[ 1 2 1,983 449.7
° 1 2,057 451.1
Subtotal 38,787 8,699.6
[ - 1 0 2,108 497.1 - 2 - 1 2,077 445.9
l 3 2 2,091 454.6 - 4 - 3 1,964 412.8 - 5 - 4 1,878 379.9
[ - 6 - 5 1,864 365.5 - 7 - 6 1,778 338.1 - 8 - 7 1,799 348.9 - 9 - 8 1,635 305.6
[ -10 - 9 1,620 292.9 -12 -10 2,963 518.4 -15 -12 3,690 592.3
l -20 -15 4,663 693.6 -30 -20 5,050 648.2
-30 8,245 391.9
L Subtotal 43,425 6,685.6
TOTAL 82,212 15,385.2
L § Data from Federal Order No. 131 not included. * Totals may not add due to rounding.
l ! 'I t
l
L Table I-SA.
[
[
[
[
[
r l [
r '-
[
[
t [
[
[
[ ,.... )
Number of Farms and Milk Harketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings
Current Time Period: January-March 1985 Previous Time Period: January-March 1981/82 Base Period Divp.rsion Program Status: Participants
Percentage Difference Greater than Less or equal to than
50 25 20 15 12 10
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o
Subtotal
- 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30
Subtotal
TOTAL
50 25 20 15 12 10
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
o - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30
Farms number
106 86 33 54 43 39 22 29 21 35 38 47 44 46 51 81
775
94 91 98
ll7 129 171 169 176 186 210 452 823
1,643 4,104 7,321
15,784
16 .• 559
Current period
marketings* mil. lbs.
25.0 20.3 5.4
11.7 14.3 7.6 5.1 6.2 3.3 7.8 7.9
15.8 9.0
13.3 9.4
18.0
180.3
17.4 18.5 19.1 24.1 25.0 33.5 33.8 39.9 41.3 42.2
100.8 185.5 356.9 824.8 928.9
2,691. 7
2,872.0
§ Data from Federal Orders Nos. 94, 137, and 138 not included.
* Totals may not add due to rounding.
1 'I '
l
l [
[
[
l [
r [
[
r [
[
l [
[
r
Table 1-5B. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings
Current Time Period: January-March 1985 Previous Time Period: January-March 1981/82 Base Period Diversion Program Status: Participants Adjusted by Contract
Percentage Difference Greater than Less or equal to than
50 25 20 15 12 10
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o
Subtotal
- 1 - 2
3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30
Subtotal
TOTAL
50 25 20 15 12 10
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
o - 1
2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -2.0 -30
Farms number
174 319 230 389 424 375 221 227 298 316 352 375 422 468 447 477
5,514
490 517 508 526 507 559 461 466 489 398 810
1,051 1,330 1,565 1,368
11,045
16,559
Current period
marketings* mil. lbs.
40.2 74.9 42.2 75.5 94.1 74.2 56.1 49.4 67.6 64.9 68.9 79.6 90.6 93.0
102.3 96.5
1,169.8
105.0 110.0 101.5 114.2 106.7 111.0 98.9 81.5 87.3 71.1
138.6 160.6 179.4 162.1 74.2
1,702.2
2,872.0
§ Data from Federal Orders Nos. 94, 137, and 138 not included.
* Totals may not add due to rounding.
! ' I f
.[
[
[
r [
[
[
[
[
[
l [
[
Table 1-5C. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings
Current Time Period: Previous Time Period: Diversion Program Status:
Percentage Difference Greater than Less or equal to than
50 25 20 15 12 10
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o
Subtotal
- 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30
Subtotal
TOTAL
50 25 20 15 12 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
° - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30
January-March 1985 January-March 1981/82 Base Period Non-Participants
Farms number
6,222 9,511 3,483 4,321 2,928 2, ll6 1,125 1,149 1,155 1,203 1,148 1,216 1,133 1,153 1, ll7 1,171
40,151
1,109 1,126 1,040 1,078
978 1,003
987 939 911 824
1,520 1,987 2. ,796 3,636 4,975
24,909
65,060
Current period
marketings'" mil. lbs.
1,611.8 2,503.4
908.7 1,088.8
706.0 513.9 252.5 251.4 257.4 268.2 251. 8 259.2 238.3 259.0 232.8 238.4
9,841. 6
233.6 219.0 204.0 204.9 173.2 177.6 183.2 168.6 163.6 139.7 246.2 308.9 404.7 457.9 357.9
3,642.8
13,484.4
§ Data from Federal Orders Nos. 33, 36, 94, 137, and 138 not included.
* Totals may not add due to rounding.
I f' ..
[
[ Table 1-5D.
[
[
r l
[
[
r L l L L [
L L [ r
Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings Previous Period Marketings
Current Time Period: January-March 1985 Previous Time Period: January-March 1984 Diversion Program Status: Participants
Percentage Difference Current Greater than Less period or eg,ual to than Farms marketings*
number mil. lbs.
50 350 54.1 25 50 650 110.0 20 25 339 71.3 15 20 495 88.7 12 15 427 86.2 10 12 301 67.0 9 10 212 43.3 8 9 224 45.5 7 8 222 45.8 6 7 262 55.1 5 6 241 47.4 4 5 257 53.8 3 4 308 59.5 2 3 312 62.3 1 2 339 69.7 0 1 363 84.0
Subtotal 5,302 1,043.9
- 1 0 383 76.2 - 2 - 1 382 79.9 - 3 - 2 378 73.4 - 4 - 3 400 73.7 - 5 - 4 383 74.3 - 6 - 5 363 74.2 - 7 - 6 376 67.7 - 8 - 7 370 69.4 - 9 - 8 386 86.0 -10 - 9 372 74.1 -12 -10 716 162.6 -15 -12 1,041 202.7 -20 -15 1,462 241. 8 -30 -20 1,993 283.1
-30 2,300 202.5
Subtotal 11,305 1,841. 7
TOTAL 16,607 2,885.7
§ Data from Federal Orders Nos. 94, 137, and 138 not included.
* Totals may not add due to rounding.
the and
[
l Table 1-5E. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the
r Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings
Current Time Period: January-March 1985
[ Previous Time Period: January-March 1984 Diversion Program Status: Non-Participants
[ Percentage Difference Current Greater than Less period or eg,ual to than Farms marketings*
[ number mil. Ibs.
50 2,026 408.9
[ 25 50 5,053 1,082.9 20 25 2,829 640.1 15 20 4,185 988.1 12 15 3,348 813.5
[ 10 12 2,653 668.1 9 10 1,435 347.2 8 9 1,536 376.3
[ 7 8 1,652 411. 9 6 7 1,673 405.1 5 6 1,789 428.2 4 5 1,812 435.0
[ 3 4 1,953 463.9 2 3 1,995 484.7 1 2 1,985 471.3
[ 0 1 2,059 476.3
Subtotal 37,983 8,901.4
r - 1 0 2,046 479.1 - 2 - 1 2,019 449.2 - 3 - 2 2,012 443.4
[ - 4 - 3 1,983 424.2 - 5 - 4 1,957 427.0 - 6 - 5 1,931 403.6
[ - 7 - 6 1,855 376.3 - 8 - 7 1,796 346.1 - 9 - 8 1,718 323.5 -10 - 9 1,559 289.2
L -12 -10 2,840 503.5 -15 -12 3,635 607.5 -20 -15 4,401 648.0
[ -30 -20 4,558 566.1
-30 4,895 324.7
Subtotal 39,205 6,611.3
[ TOTAL 77 ,188 15,512.7
l § Data from Federal Orders Nos. 94, 137, and 138 not included.
* r Totals may not add due to rounding.
I ' I •
r L.
[
r [
[
[
[
[ [
[
[
[ [
[
[ [
APPENDIX II
Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, 1984/85 Versus Base Period
\
1 ' I
--, ,.--- .., ~ r-, .-, ~ rJ r ~-, r-, ,1 11 r-l r-l r-, 11 r, r-J
Table II-i. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MOP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, First Quarter i984 Versus First Quarter Base Period
Increasing Marketings Decreasing~arketings All Farms Farms Marketings Farms Marketings
Average Average Average Federa 1 Order Mi 11 i on change Hi 11 i on change Mi 11 i on change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)
New England New York-New Jersey Middle Atlantic Georgia 1 SE. Fl or i da, et a 1 . Chicago Regional Ohio Valley E. Ohio-W. Penn. Southern Michigan
Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks
1 2 4 7
30 33 36 40 49 62
Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest Black Hi lls E. South Dakota Iowa New Orlea~s-Miss. Nashville 4 Southwest Plains Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget
4Sound-lnland
Texas
68 75 76 79 94 98
106 108 124 125 126
Central Arizona 131 SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135 Colorado 137 Rio Grande Valley 138 '
Orders Combined*
72 126
25 20 22
203 68 50 95 54 88 51 96
235 o
23 158
35 411
33 8
10 9
126 3
3
10 2
1,669
* May not add due to rounding.
7.5 8.5 3.6 4.5
12.7 8.3 8.0 7.9 9.4
11.8 7.1 9.2
13.2 8.6 0.0
18.3 16.8 8.3
10.4 5.7 3 . 1 5.4 5.6
15.9 6.7 6.3 2.8 5.9
8.9
See footnotes at end of Table 11-8.
14 25
6
8 38 39 10
7
16 8
16 9
17 38 o 4
23 17
7
8
4
4
48 6
2 2
377
7.5 10.7 4.2 7.0
14.7 10.1 7.9 7.5 9.6
11.9 8.1
10.6 15.2 9.8 0.0
19.9 17.6 21.2 12.3 7.5 3.7 5.1 6.1
19.7 6.7 6.8 2.1
10.9
10.5
7 .0 13.1 5.8
20 . 0 16.0 11.0 9.9
11.3 B.9
10.9 9.0
11.6 35.9 10.1 0.0
35.8 40.2 23.5 11. 1
9.8 25.8 12.0
2.1 36.8 6.0
10.9 12.6 5.8
17.1
884 1,354
677 426 151
2,243 785 584 919 405
1 ,147 505 630
2,505 19
103 783 388 378 545 246 174 152 664
42 45
342 32
17,128
92.5 91.5 96.4 95.5 87.3 91.7 92.0 92.1 90.6 88.2 92.9 90.8 86.8 91.4
100.0 81.7 83.2 91.7 89.6 94.3 96.9 94.6 94.4 84.1 93.3 93.8 97.2 94.1
91. 1
176 206 143 109 218 345 118
81 151
61 180
74 94
356 4
15 110
62 52 98 35 70 54
195 78 16 99 20
3,216
92.5 89.3 95.8 93.0 85.3 89.9 92.,1 92.5 90.4 88.1 91.9 89.4 84.8 90.2
100.0 80.1 82.4 78.8 87.7 92.5 96.3 94.9 93.9 80.3 93.3 93.2 97.9 89.1
89.5
-22.0 -26.4 -25.6 -31.9 -20.9 -21.5 -23.0 -22.9 -22.8 -24.2 -23.8 -25.6 -28.4 -22.0 -21.8 -26.1 -22.8 -37.2 -24.3 -26.8 -30.4 -24.7 -28.1 -27.7 -20.2 -30.6 -29.0 -25.6
-24.7
956 191 -20.4 1,480 230 -23.6
702 149 -24.6 446 117 -29.7 173 256 -17.0
2,446 383 -19.1 853 128 -21.1 634 88 -21.1
1,014 167 -20.6 459 69 -21.2
1,235 195 -21.9 556 83 -22.9 726 110 -22.9
2,740 394 -19.7 19 4 -21.8
126 18 -18.8 941 133 -16.2 423 78 -29.9 422 59 -21.2 578 106 -24.9 254 36 -29.2 184 74 -23.5 161 58 -26.8 790 242 -20.3
45 83 -18.8 48 18 -28.8
352 101 -28.4 34 22 -23.1
18,797 3,593 -21.7
--, II r-l II r -, II r-, iJ rJ 11 11 ~ r---"] II rj r, ,.-, II i1
Table II-2. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Second Quarter 1984 Versus Second Quarter Base Period
Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings All Farms Farms Marketings Farms Marketings
Average Average Average Federal Order Million change Million change Million change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)
New England 1 New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlantic 4 Georgi a 7
1 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33 E. Ohio-W. Penn. 36 Southern Michigan Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks
40 49 62
Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest 68 Black Hills 75 E. South Dakota 76 Iowa 79 New Orlea~s-Miss. 94 Nashville 4 98 Southwest Plains 106 Central Arkansas 108 Oregon-Washington 124 Puget
4Sound-lnland 125
Texas 126 Central Arizona 131 SW. , I daho-E. Oregon 135 Colorado 137 Rio Grande Valley 138
Orders Combined*
16 66 9
12 12 81 25 18 30 12 38 19 63
126 2
11
89 21
6
14 7
5
2
124 1
2
7
o
818
* May not add due to rounding.
1.7 4.6 1 .3
2.7 7.0 3.3 2.9 2.8 3.0 2.6 3.1 3.5 9.1 4.6
10.5 8.8 9.8 4.9 1.4 2.4 2.8 2.7 1.2
15.4 2.2 4.2 2.0 0.0
4.4
See footnotes at end of Table 11-8.
3 13
6 27 15
4 2 5 2 7
3
11 21
2
13 2
3
1
53 2
1
3 o
203
1.4 5.8 1.0 5.7
12.0 3.8 3.7 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.6 3.5
10.0 5.4
15.2 8.3
10.3 14.1 1.4 2.5 3.7 1.9 1.0
22.4 3.2 4.2 2.5 0.0
6.0
9.4 16.8 15.4 34.9 28.0 9.7 6.0
13.7 8.5
16.6 11. 1 14.9 58.3 9.6 7.8
54.8 46.8 24.3 5.9
12.0 21.1 20.3 0.9
28.7 18.8 17.3 3.8 0.0
22.7
940 1,377
675 437 160
2,365 829 617 984 447
1 ,197 522 628
2,614 17
114 822 410 416 564 247 179 159 680
44 46
345 34
17,869
98.3 95.4 98.7 97.3 93.0 96.7 97.1 97.2 97.0 97.4 96.9 96.5 90.9 95.4 89.5 91.2 90.2 95.1 98.6 97.6 97.2 97.3 98.8 84.6 97.8 95.8 98.0
100.0
95.6
171 217 138 94
198 376 118 83
157 64
184 76 95
364 3
17 116
15 52
101 34 72 57
183 75 17 99 21
3,199
98.6 94.2 99.0 94.3 88.0 96.2 96.3 97.4 97.1 96.8 96.4 96.5 90.0 94.6 84.8 91.7 89.7 85.9 98.6 97.5 96.3 98.1 99.0 77 .6 96.8
, 95.8
97.5 100.0
94.0
-29.5 -30.1 -29.8 -37.2 -24.2 -25.1 -28.4 -28.9 -28.1 -29.6 -28.8 -30.7 -32.2 -26.1 -25.5 -30.3 -27.8 -41.0 -32.8 -29.6 -34.0 -36.5 -36.5 -28.6 -24.4 -43.9 -35.1 -35.7
-29.2
956 1,443
684 449 172
2,446 854 635
174 231 139 100 224 391 123 85
1,014 162 459 66
1,235 191 541 78 691 106
2,740 385 19 4
125 18 911 129 431 17 422 53 578 104 254 35 184 74 161 58 804 236
45 77 48 17
352 102 34 21
18,687 3,402
-29.1 -28.4 -29.5 -35.2 -20.3 -24.2 - 27.6 -28.2 -27.4 -28.7 -27.9 -29.7 -28.1 -24.8 -21.9 -27.0 -23.8 -36.3 -32.4 -28.9 -32.8 -36.0 -36.2 -20.6 -23.5 -42.6 -34.4 -35.7
-27.4
.-., r-J ~ rJ 11 11 r 1 ,- 1 r , r , 11 11 ·n -, r --, r--1 ~ -, r-,
Table 11-3. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Third Quarter 1984 Versus Third Quarter Base Period
Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings All Farms Farms Marketings Farms Marketings
Average Average Average Federal Order Million change Million change Million change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)
New England 1 New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlantic 4 Georgi a 1 7 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33 E. Ohio-W. P~nn. 36 Southern Michigan 40 Indiana 2 49 St. Louis-Oz~rks 62 greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest 68 Black Hills 75 E. South Dakota 76 Iowa 79 New Orlea~s-Miss. 94 Nashville 4 98 Southwest Plains 106 Central Arkansas 108 Oregon-Washington 124 Puget
4Sound-lnland 125
Texas 126 Central Arizona 131 SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135 Colorado 137 Rio Grande Valley 138
Orders Combined*
23 84 18 16 9
87 35 22 40 16 48 29 66
149 1
12 83 20 14 23 9 2 4
80 o
6
o
897
* May not add due to rounding. Less than 0.5 million pounds.
2.4 6.0 2.7 3.5 5.2 3.6 4.1 3.5 3.9 3.5 3.9 5.5 9.8 5.4 5.3 9.7 9.2 4.7 3.3 4.0 3.5 1.1 2.5 9.9 0.0 2.1 1.7 0.0
4.8
See foot.notes at end of Table 11-8.
4 15
4
3
15 15
6
3 8
3 10
4
11 18
O§
1
11 7
2
5 2
1
31 o O§
2 o
184
2.7 7.3 2.9 4.8 8.8 4.3 5.2 3.6 5.2 5.0 5.7 5.3
10.8 5.6 5.9 8.9 9.4
12.0 3.5 5.0 5.5 0.7 1.7
15.6 0.0 2.1 2.4 0.0
6.0
9.3 15.9 5.8
28.0 27.5 10.3 11. 1 5.4
10.6 16.2 11.6 17.7 42.9 11.5 1.2
21.2 36.8 29.8 11.5 9.6
13.8 30.1 9.2
25.4 0.0
11.0
10.7 0.0
18.9
933 1,321
649 445 164
2,359 819 613 974 443 .
1,187 503 606
2,591 18
112 815 409 408 555 245 182 157 732
45 47
346 34
17,712
97.6 94.0 97.3 96.5 94.8 96.4 95.9 96.5 96.1 96.5 96.1 94.5 90.2 94.6 94.7 90.3 90.8 95.3 96.7 96.0 96.5 98.9 97.5 90.1
100.0 97.9 98.3
100.0
95.2
158 188 132
64 160 347 106 76
151 54
165 70 90
309 3
15 106
48 49 91 30 71 56
170 57 17 99 20
2,898
97.3 92.7 97.1 95.2 91.2 95.7 94.8 96.4 94.8 95.0 94.3 94.7 89.2 94.4 94.1 91.1 90.6 88.0 96.5 95.0 94.5 99.3 98.3 84.4
100.0 97.9 97.6
100.0
94.0
-29.8 -30.6 -27.4 -41.4 -26.7 -26.6 -27.9 -28.7 -28.9 -29.8 -29.8 -28.8 -31.1 -28.4 -26.4 -33.3 . -30.2 -40.6 -32.7 -28.8 -32.7 -35.2 -37.7 -29.0 -33.5 -43.7 -35.4 -36.7
-30.3
956 162 -29.1 1,405 203 -28.5
667 136 -26.7 461 67 -39.8 173 175 -23.9
2,446 363 -25.5 854 112 -26.5 635 78 -27.9
1,014 159 -27.5 459 57 -28.4
1,235 175 -28.3 532 74 -27.3 672 101 -27.0
2,740 327 -27.0 19 4 -25.2
124 16 -30.6 898 117 -26.8 429 54 -36.5 422 51 -31. 7 578 95 -27,5 254 31 -31.2 184 72 -35.0 161 57 -37.2 812 202 -23.9
45 57 -33.5 48 17 -43.1
352 101 -34.8 34 20 -36.7
18,609 3,082 -28.5
-) r----, r-, ., 11 r ., r-, rJ r----, r-1 rJ rJ r, r, r-} ,---, ---, r,
Table II-4. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Fourth Quarter 1984 Versus Fourth Quarter Base Period
Increasing Market.ings Farms Marketings
Average Federal Order Million change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number
New England New York-New Jersey Midd.le Atlantic Georgia 1 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional Ohio Valley E. Ohio-W. Penn.
2 4
7
30 33 36
Southern Michigan 40 I ndi ana ') 49 St. Louis-Ozarks~ 62 Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest 68 Black Hills 75 E. South Dakot.a Iowa New Orlea~s-Miss. Nashville . 4 Sout.hwest Plalns Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget
4Sound-lnland
Texas ·Central Arizona SW. Idaho-E. Oregon Colorado Rio Grande Valley
Orders Combined*
76 79 94 98
106 108 124 125 126 131
135 137 138
50 92 49 19 14
161 47 37 34 21 56 24 51
185 o
11 82 18 32 21 7
5 4
65
10 o
1,097
* May not add due to rounding.
5.2 6.7 7.3 4.2 8.1 6.6
5.5 5.8 3.4 4.5 4.5 4.6 7.7 6.8 0.0 9.2 9.6 5.7 7.6 3.6 2.6 2.7 2.5 7.9 2.2 2.1 2.8 0.0
6.0
See footnotes at end of Table 11-8.
8 15 13
6
29 26
9
4 7
3 9
4 8
27 o 2
12 5 4 4
25 1
o 4 o
230
5.0 7.7 9.5 6.5
15.4 7.8 8.2 5.4 4.4
5.9 5.3 5.9 8.7 8.4 0.0
13.8
10.8 9.2 8.3 4.6 2.7 1.6 2.7
12.3 2.2 1.0 4.3 0.0
7.6
12.8 16.1 8.9
20.2 15.6 10.6
8.2 10.3 13.9 9 . 1
10. "3
13.8 13.1 10.2 0.0 7.3
20.7 82.3 9.7
11.9 10.9 17.9 9.3
32.5 1.9 3.7
11. 1 0.0
15.3
906 1,276
619 433 158
2,285 807 598 980 441
1,179 495 608
2,555 19
108 774 297 390 557 262 179 157 756
44
47 342 34
17,306
Decreasing Marketings A 11 Farms Farms Marketings
Average Average Million change Million change
Percent pounds _____ Per~e~ (percent) Number pounds* (percent)
94.8 93.3 92.7 95.8 91.9 93.4 94.5 94.2 96.6 95.5 95.5 95.4 92.3 93.2
100.0 90.8 90.4 94.3 92.4 96.4 97.4 97.3 97.5
92.1 97.8
97.9
97.2 100.0
94.0
160 175 126
89 160 307
99 71
144 51
162 68 88
293 3
14 98 47 50 87 31 66 51
178 63 15 88 18
2,800
95.0 92.3 90.5 93.5 84.6 92.2 91.8 94.6 95.6 94.1 94.7 94.1 91.3 91.6
100.0 86.2 89.2 90.8 91.7 95.4 97.3 98.4 97.3 87.7 97.8 99.0 95.7
100.0
92.4
-26.0 -30.1 -26.9 -37.2 -32.0 . -25.5 -28.5 -28.6 -28.3 -29.3 -29.2 -28.9 -29.3 -27.6 -27.1 -28.7 -27.2 -41.4 -28.8 -31. 7
-33.2 -29.5 -32.9 -30.3 -32.5 -35.1 -34.8 -37.1
-29.6
956 1,368
668 452 172
2,446 854 635
168 189 140 95
190 334 108 75
1,014 150 462 54
1,235 171 519 72 659 97
2,740 320 19 3
119 16 856 110 315 52 422 54 578 91 269 32 184 67 161 52 821 203
45 64 48 15
352 92 34 18
18,403 3,031
-24.7 -27.9 -24.6 -35.1 -27.4 -23.6 -26.4 -27.2 -27.1 -27.8 -27.9 -27.3 -26.9 -25.5 -27.1 -25.2 -23.9 -37.5 -26.7 -30.4 -32.4 -29.0 -32.1 -25.9 -32.0 -34.8 -33.7 -37;1
-27.5
,
;--, r--, 11
Table II-5.
rJ r -, f'"J" r-l r-, r--., ,--, rJ 11 r-, r, .--, ,.---,
Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, First Quarter 1985 Versus First Quarter Base Period
Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings Farms Marketings Farms Marketings
Average Average
'--1 rJ r-1
All Farms
Average Federal Order Million change Million change Million change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)
New England New York-New Jersey Middle Atlantic Georgia 1 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional Ohio Valley E. Ohio-W. Penn. Sout.hern Michigan
1 2
4
7
30 33 36 40 49 Indiana 2
St. Louis-Ozarks 62 Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa Upper Midwest Black Hills E. South Dakota Iowa Nashville
3 4
Southwest Plains Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget.
4Sound-lnland
Texas
65 68 75 76 79 98
106 108 124 125 126
Central Arizona 131 SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135
Orders Combined*
33 64 21 18 14
114
21 20 34 18 38 14
54 119
o 12 60 15 10
5 4 2
83 " 1
775
* May not add due to rounding. § Less than 0.5 million pounds.
3.5 4.8 3.2 4.7 9.1 4.9 2.8 3.5 3.7 4.7 3.3 2.8 8.3 4.7 0.0
10.1
7.2 3.6 1.9 2.0 2.2 1.2
11.9 2.2 2.1
4.7
See footnotes at end of Table 11-8.
7 14
6
6 28 21
4
3 5
3 6
3
9 23 o 2 9
2 2
1
O§ 24
2
180
4.4 7.1 4.6 6.3
13.0 6.0 3.3 3.4 3.7 5.1 3.5 3.7 9.5 6.7 0.0 9.7 8.0 4.8 2.4 2.0 1.1 0.9
17.2 2.7 3.6
6.3
5.4 21. 1
9.9 25 . 4 22.5 10.7 10.7 8.3 9.6 7.8
15.0 7.4
34.5 9.5 0.0
66.0 75.9 14.6 6.4
37.9 7.5 5.3
30.9 0.6
2.3 "
19.1
923 1,270
638 361 140
2,192 718 559 875 365
1 ,129 491 594
2,421 18
107 773 407 515 245 180 159 613 44 47
15,784
96.5 95.2 96.8 95.3 90.9 95.1 97.2 96.5 96.3 95.3 96.7 97.2 91.7 95.3
100.0 89.9 92.8 96.4 98 . 1 98.0 97.8 98.8 88.1 97.8 97.9
95.3
163 184 132
91 186 326 102 72
140 50
167 67 88
315 3
14 99 49 88 33
66 51
114 73 16
2,692
95.6 92.9 95.4 93.7 87.0 94.0 96.7 96.6 96.3 94.9 96.5 96.3 90.5 93.3
100.0 90.3 92.0 95.2 97.6 98.0 98.9 99.1 82.8 97.3 96.4
93.7
-25.5 -31.5 -28.3 -36.6 -31.4 -25.5 -29.9 -29.9 -29.1 -30.3 -29.9 -31.0 -29.7 -29.1 -26.0 -29.2 -28.8 -32.3 -32.3 -33.8 -29.3 -31.9 -36.2 -26.0 -31.3
-29.8
956 1,334
659 379 154
2,306 739 579 909 383
1,167 505 648
2,540 18
119 833 422 525 250 184 161 696 45 48
16,559
171 198 138 97
214 347 106 75
145 52
173 70 98
338 3
16 108 52 90 34 67 52
138 75 16
2,872
-24.5 -29.3 -27.1 -34.5 -27.2 -24.0 -29.0 -29.0 -28.2 -29.1 -29.0 -30.1 -26.4 -27.4 -26.0 -25.0 -25.2 -30.9 -31.7 -33.2 -29.1 -31. 7
-30.1 -25.5 -30.5
-27.9
-, 11 r--, --, r-, r--, rJ rJ r-t 'J rJ ;-, ,---, ~ r-,
Table 1I-6. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, January-December 1984 Versus January-December Base Period
Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings Farms Marketings Farms Marketings
r--, ;-- 1 ,....,
All Farms
Average Average Average Federal Order Million change Million change Million change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)
New England New York-New Jersey Middle Atlantic Georgia 1 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional Ohi 0 Vall ey E. Ohio-W. Penn. Southern Michigan Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks
1 2 4 7
30 33 36 40 49 62
Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest 68 Black Hills 75 E. South Dakota Iowa New Orlea~s-Miss. Nashville . 4 Southwest Plalns Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget Sound-Inland
4 Texas
76 79 94 98
106 108 124 125 126
Central Arizona 131 SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135 Colorado 137 Rio Grande Valley 138
Orders Combined* 82
3 27 o
11
9 13
4 3 8 6 9
3 29 31 o 6
43 16
2
2
o 82
2
o
313
* May not add due to rounding.
0.3 2.0 0.0 2.8 5.4 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.9 1.6 0.8 0.6 4.5 .1.2 0.0 5.1 5.1 5.3 0.5 0.2 0.4 1.1 0.0
11.4 2.2 2.1 0.6 0.0
1.8
See footnotes at end of Table 11-8.
2 27 o
16 67 12
2 2
10 5 8
2 19 21 o 5
25 19
1
2
o 147
8
5 o
407
0.3 3.2 0.0 4.3 8.2 0.8 0.5 0.6 1.7 2.3 1.1 0.6 4.7 1.5 0.0 7.4 5.4 7.4 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.0
16.7 2.7 2.2 1.2 0.0
3.2
S.2 23.7 0 . 0
30.6 22.3 24.3 7.0 4.6 8.3 8.7
15.6 16.4 43.8 13.1 0.0
17.6 49.5 42.2 3.9 0.7
92.1 40.3 0.0
25.4 8.1 4.8
15.2 0.0
24.8
953 1,312
668 379 157
2,298 734 578 921 378
1,156 506 619
2,518 19
112 802 288 420 529 250 182 161 638
44 47
350 29
17 ,048
99.7 98.0
100.0 97.2 94.6 99.4 99.5 99.5 99.1 98.4 99.2 99.4 95.5 98.8
100.0 94.9 94.9 94.7 99.5 99.8 99.6 98.9
100.0 88.6 97.8 97.9 99.4
100.0
98.2
693 803 554 347 753
1,432 448 318 621 223 714 296 378
1,369 14 63
441 232 216 382 138 284 224 731 275 66
392 77
12,488
99.7 96.8
100.0 95.7 91.8 99.2 99.5 99.4 98.3 97.7 98.9 99.4 95.3 98.5
100.0 . 92.6 94.6 92.6 99.5 99.7 99.5 99.3
100.0 83.3 97.3 97.8 98.8
100.0
96.8
-27.2 -26.9 -27.0 -34.9 -24.2 -23.1 -25.1 -25.7 -25.6 -26.7 -26.3 -26.2 -28.5 -23.9 -23.9 -27.0 -24.6 -36.9 -28.2 -27.1 -31.1 -27.8 -29.9 -26.4 -27.4 -33.0 -34.1 -31.8
-26.7
956 1,339
668 390 166
2,311 738 581 929 384
1,165 509 648
2,549 19
118 845 304 422 530 251 184 161
720 45 48
352 29
695 830 554 363 821
1,445 451 320 632 228 722 298 397
1,391 14 68
466 251 217 383 139 286 224
878 283 67
397 77
17,361 12,894
-27.1 -25.9 -27.0 -33.5 -21.8 -22.9 -25.0 -25.5 -25.2 -26.2 -26.0 -26.0 -26.8 -23.6 -23.9 -24.9 -22.6 -34.2 -28.1 -27.1 -30.9 -27.6 -29.9 -21.0 -26.7 -32.5 -33.8 -31.8
-25.8
r-
:. r---, r-J
Table II-7.
r-1 ,-, -, r, r-1 r-) rI ' ,1 r--J 11 ..--,. rJ 11
Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, IS-Month Cumulative 1984/85 Versus IS-Month Base Period
Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings Farms Marketings Farms Marketings
;-, -, ,-: - "
All Farms
Average Average Average Federal Order Million change Million change Million change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent. (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)
New England New York-New Jersey Middle Atlantic Georgia 1 SE. Florida , et al. Chicago Regional Ohio Vall ey E. Ohio-W. Penn. Southern Michigan Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks
2 4 7
30 33 36 40 49 62
Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest 81 ack Hill s E. South Dakota
Iowa 3 Nashville
4 Southwest Plain s Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget
4Sound-lnland
Texas Central Arizona SW. I daho-E. Oregon
Orders Combined*
68 75 76 79 98
106 108 124 125 126 131 135
82
o 25 o
11 8
13 2
5 3 5
26 29 o 7
41 o o 1
o o
81 1
o
260
* May not add due to rounding.
0.0 1.9 0.0 3.0 5.2 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.8 0.4 0.2 4.1 1.1 0.0 6.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0
11.4 2.2 0.0
1.6
See footnotes at. end of Table I I-B.
o 32 o
20 71 14
1 O§
4 3 7
O§
25 25 o 5
28 o o 1
o o
156 10 o
403
0.0 3.2 0.0 4.4 6.9 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.6 1.0 0.7 0.1 5.1 1.4 0.0 6.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0
15.4 2.7 0.0
2.7
0.0 24.3 0.0 .
27.1 28.4 28.0 7.9
17.0 17.9 14.3 24.5 97 . 1 45.8 15.1 0.0
26.1 69.8 0.0 0.0
108.3 0.0 0.0
29.9 6.4 0.0
29.8
956 1,285
658 351 145
2,270 728 570 887 371
1 ,157 496 610
2,506 18
109 767 422 519 244 184 161 632
44 48
16,138
100.0 98.1
100.0 97.0 94.8 99.4 99.7 99.8 99.4 99.2 99.6 99 . 8 95.9 98.9
100.0 94.0 94.9
100.0 100.0 99.6
100.0 100.0 88.6 97.8
100.0
98.4
865 985 685 429 960
1,761 552 392 757 273 886 362 464
1,696 17
75 527 268 467 169 354 276 854 348
83
14,506
100.0 96.8
100.0 95 . 6 93.1 99.2 99.8 99.9 99.4 99.0 99.3 99.9 94.9 98.6
100.0 94.0 95.0
100.0 100.0 99.4
100.0 100.0 84.6 97.3
100.0
97.3
-27 . 4 -27.4 -26.9 -34.6 -25.1 -23.2 -25.9 -26.2 -25.7 -26.6 -27.0 -26.7 -28.6 -24.7 -25.0 -27.7 -24.9 -28.6 -27.9 -31.5 -27.8 -30.3 -28.6 -27.4 -32.1
-26.7
956 1,310
658 362 153
2,283 730 571 892 374
1,162 497 636
2,535 18
116 808 422 519 245 184 161 713 45 48
16,398
865 1,018
685 449
1,031 1,774
553 392 762 276 893 362 489
1,721 17 80
555 268 467 170 354 276
1,010 358 83
14,908
-27.4 -26.4 -26.9 -33.2 -22.9 -23.0 -25.8 -26.2 -25.5 -26.3 -26.8 -26.6 -26.7 -24.3 -25.0 -25.8 -22.8 -28.6 -27.9 -31.3 -27.8 -30.3 -23.3 -26.8 -32.1
-25.8
" r-, ,..---,
Table II-8.
11 rJ ,---, r'" r, rl r1 r-, 11 rJ 11 ,---~ ;--,
Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Second Quarter 1985 Versus Second Quarter Base Period
rl r~ h
Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings All Farms Farms Marketings Farms Marketings
Average Average Average Federal Order Mi 11 i on change Mi 11 i on change Mi 11 i on change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (~cent) Number Percent pounds Perce~ Jperceilt~ Number pounds* (percent)
New England New York-New Jersey Georgia Chicago Regional Ohio Valley Indiana
2 St. Louis-Ozarks
1
2 7
30 33 49 62
Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa Upper Midwest Black Hills E. South Dakota Iowa
4 Southwest Plains Centr~l Arkansas Texas
Orders Combined*
65 68 75 76 79
106 108 126
150 251 67
568 124
67 238 107 163 731
4
25 193 90 63
198
3,039
* May not add due to rounding.
15.7 19.0 19.0 24.9 16.6 18.2 20.5 21.8 25.8 28.9 25.0 24.8 25.6 17.5 25.6 28.7
23.1
39 59 26
130 27 14 57 21 40
151 1
5 39 24 111
91
740
19.5 24.2 25.4 30.4 21.4 22.3 26.7 24.4 32.5 35.1 28.3 27.4 30.9 22.9 32.6 37.9
28.9
11.2 15.4 15.7 11.5 11.5 8.6
12.4 14.0 23.6 11.6 8.8
15.7 20.8 10.0 15.3 22.9
14.4
806 1,069
286 1,709
623 302 922 383 468
1,795 12 76
561 424 183 491
10,110
84.3 81.0 81.0 75.1 83.4 81.8 79.5 78.2 74.2 71.1 75.0 75.2 74.4 82.5 74.4 71.3
76.9
161 184
77 299 101 49
158 66 82
278 3
13 87 82 29
149
1,819
80.5 75.8 74.6 69.6 78.6 77.7
73.3 75.6 67.5 64.9 71.7
72.6 69.1 77 .1 67.4 62.1
71.1
-23.8 -26.3 -28.7 -21.0 -25.9 ,25.4 -23.9 -21.9 -23.0 -21.0 -19.8 -16.5 -21.3 -26.4 -29.0 -27.0
-23.8
Data for Florida producers in the following orders: Southeastern Florida (13); Tampa Bay (12); and Upper Florida (6).
956 200 -18.8 1,320 243 -19.3
353 103 -21.0 2,277 429 -13.3
747 128 -20 . 2 369 63 -19.8
1 ,160 215 -16.7 490 87 -15.4 631 122 -12.2
2,526 429 -12.0 16 4 -13.4
101 18 - 9.6 754 126 -11.8 514 107 -20.4 246 43 -18.8 689 240 -13.7
13,149 2,558 -15.7
2 Data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the following orders: Southern Illinois (32); St. Louis-Ozarks (62); Central Illinois (50); Paducah (99); Southwest Plains (106); and Texas (126). Excludes data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the Chicago Regional Order (30) and Greater Kansas City Order (64).
3 Data for Kentucky and Tennessee producers in the following orders: Tennessee Valley (#11); Louisvi11e-Lexington-Evansville (#46); and Nashville (#98).
4 Excludes data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the order.
[
r [
r l
[
[
[
r [ [ r
[
l [ [
l
APPENDIX III
Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, 1984/85 Versus 1983/84
I 'I •
~ 11 .--, r-, r -1 ;---, ,-....-, r-l r-, ,-, r-, 11 rJ II .----, ,-....-, 11 ,...-, r-,
Table III-I. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings(MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, First Quarter 1984 Versus First Quarter 1983 .
Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings All Farms Farms Marketings Farms Marketings
Average Average Average Federal Order Million change Million change Million change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)
New England 1 New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlant.ic 4 Georgi a 1 7 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33 E. Ohio-W. Penn. 36 Southern Michigan Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks
40 49 62
Great.er Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest. 68 Black Hills 75 E. South Dakota Iowa New Orlea~s-MiSs. Nashville . 4 Southwest Plalns Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget
4Sound-lnland
Texas SW. Idaho-E. Oregon Colorado
76 79 94 98
106 108 124 125 126 135 137
Rio Grande Valley 138
Orders Combined*
120 242
70 47 36
371 110
87 95 85
114 78
116 338
5 20
176 66 31 58 16 15 10 76
8 26
4
2,420
* May not. add due to rounding.
12.6 16.8 10.2 10.4 21. 1
15.2 13.2 14.4 9.4
18.5 9.2
14.0 16.0 12.3 26.3 15.9 18.7 15.5 13.7
10.1 6.3 8.4 6.4 9.3
16.7 7.4
11.8
13.1
See footnotes at end of Table 111-7.
23 40 12 17 63 62· 16 12 16 13 19 12 20 49
3
26 20
4
11 3 5
4
27 3 9 3
493
12.0 17.9 8.2
14.3 24.1 16.1 12.8 14.1 9.6
18.2 9.8
14.5 17.8 12.5 38.0 16.8 19.5 25.5 12.6 10.3 7.4 7.3 7.2
10.7 17.7 8.7
14.0
14.2
10.8 12.0 12.8 17.8 11.4 9.4
12.5 14.5 8.9
10.8 7.6
16.4 13.6 11. 1
16.5 17.1 17.8 19.2 17.3 12.0 18.1 8.2 9.1
17.1 6.5
18.0 10.2
12.5
836 1,199
617 404 135
2,075 726
519
87.4 83.2 89.8 89.6 78.9 84.8 86.8 85.6
919 90.6 374 81.5
1,121 90.8 478 86.0 610 84.0
2,402 87.7 14 - 73.7
106 84.1 765 81.3 361 84.5 196 86.3 517 89.9 236 93.7 163 91.6 147 93.6 737 90.7
40 83.3 326 92.6
30 88.2
16,053 86.9
168 186 136 102 199 322 110 73
151 56
176 71 91
345 2
15 107
59 27 95 33
68 53
223 14 93 19
2,992
88.0 82.1 91.8 85.7 75.9 83.9 87.2 85.9 90.4 81.8 90.2 85.5 82.2 87.5 62.0 83.2 80.5 74.5 87.4 89.7 92.6 92.7 92.8 89.3 82.3 91.3 86.0
85.8
-20.6 -22.7 -20.6 -27.3 -18.6 -19.2 -22.1 -20.9 -22 .8 -23.6 -23.5 -22.8 -23.7 -20.6 -18.4 -23.0 -20.7 -26.1 -28.8 -23.0 -28.5 -23.4 -29.7 -25.3 -25.8 -29.8 -23.2
-22.6
956 1,441
687 451 171
2,446 836 606
1,014 459
1,235 556 726
2,740 19
126 941 427 227 575 252 178 157 813
48 352
34
191 226 148 119 263 383 126 85
167 69
195 83
110 394
4 18
133 79 31
106 36 73 57
249 18
101 22
18,473 3,486
-17.8 -18.2 -18.6 -23.1 -12.9 -15.6 -18.9 -17.3 -20.6 -19.0 -21 ;2 -18.8 -18.9 -17.6 - 7.9 -18.3 -15.3 -18.1 -25.0 -20.5 -26.4 -21.7 -27.8 -22.2 -21.6 -27.2 -19.8
-19.0
.---, II 11 :--J r, r--"1 11 r-,. 11 r-, r--J '-'. r--, 11 r---l
Table 111-2. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Second Quarter 1984 Versus Second Quarter 1983
Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings Farms Marketings Farms Marketings
rJ iJ r-,
A 11 Farms
Average Average Average Federal Order Million change Million change Million change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)
New England 1 New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlantic 4 Georgi a 1 7 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Vall ey 33 E. Ohio-W. Penn. 36 Southern Michigan 40 Indiana 2 49 St. Louis-Ozarks 62 Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa Upper Mi dwes t Black Hills E. South Dakota Iowa New Orleass-Miss. Nashville 4 Southwest Plains Central Arkansas Or egon-Washington Puget
4Sound-lnland
Texa s
65 68 75 76 79 94 98
106 108 124 125 126
SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135 Colorado 137 Rio Grande Valley 138
Orders Combined*
63 163 39 32 17
262 74 50 86 44 72
60 63
213 5
10 130
32 21 56 16
13 10 93
4
31 o
1,659
* May not add due t o rounding.
6.6 11.4
5 . 8 7.0 9.9
10.7 8.8 8.1 8.5 9.6 5 .8
11. 1 9.1 7.8
26.3 8.0
14.3 7.5 9.9 9.7 6.3 7.2 6.4
11.3 8.3 8.8 0.0
9 . 0
See f ootnot es at end of Table 111-7.
12 29 7
10 37 46 12
6 12
7
12 .9 9
32 2 2
19 2 3
10 2 4 3
41 1
9
o
338
6.9 12.5 5.1 9.9
15.9 11. 7 9.7 7.5 7.6
10.2 6.2
11. 1
8.4 8.4
45.5 8.7
14.9 10.1 11. 1
9.5 7.1 5.6 5.2
17.2 8.3 8.5 0.0
10 . 2
9.4 12.7 10.3 22.5 22.1 9.0
17.7 10 .5 11.4 10.4 13.1 14.7 12.7 9.9 5.8
38.4 22 .8 25.1 20.8 11. 7 17.0
7.3 15.3 22.6 9.8
13.8 0.0
14.9
893 1,268
633 422 155
2,184 771
565 927 415
1,163 481 628
2,527 14
115 781 397 192 520 236 168 147 731
44 321 34
16,732
93.4 88.6 94.2 93.0 90.1 89.3 91.2 91.9 91.5 90.4 94.2 88.9 90.9 92.2 73.7 92.0 85.7 92.5 90.1 90.3 93 . 7 92.8 93. 6 88.7 91.7 91.2
100.0
91.0
162 201 131
92 195 345 110
77
150 60
179 70 97
353 2
17 110
15 24 94 33 69 54
199 16 93 21
2,967
93.1 87.5 94.9 90.1 84.1 88.3 90.3 92.5 92.4 89.8 93.8 88.9 91.6 91.6 54.5 91.3 85.1 89.9 88.9 90.5 92.9 94.4 94.8 82.8 91.7 91.5
100.0
89.8
-25.7 -25.9 -25.1 -31 . 8 -24 . 2 -22.2 -26 . 6 -25.9 -25 . 4 -26.5 -28.5 -28.5 -27.2 -24.9 -27.9 -27.5 -25.0 -33.4 -33.1 -26.5 -32.6 -32.8 -35.2 -28.6 -37.0 -30.3 -29.5
-26.7
956 1,431
672
454 172
174 230 138 102 232
2,446 391 845 121 615 83
1,013 162 459 66
1,235 191 541 78 691 106
2,740 385 19 4
125 18 911 129 429 17 213 26 576 103 252 35 181 73 157 57 824 241
48 17 352 102
34 21
18,391 3,304
-24.0 -22.6 -23.9 -28.6 -19.4 -19.5 -23.8 -24.0 -23.5 -23.9 -26.9 -25.4 -25.0 -22.8 -15.7 -24.4 -20.4 -30.0 -29.6 -24.0 -30 . 5 -31.3 -33.7 -23.1 -34.7 -27.9 -29.5
-23.9
.-, ., r-l ~ ,., 11 r,rr r-l r-, rJ r---'l .. ,--.,. r-, .& r-, ,--, ,.--, ;--]
Table 111-3. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Third Quarter 1984 Versus Third Quarter 1983
Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings All Farms Farms Marketings Farms Marketings
Average Average Average Federal Order Million change Million change Million change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)
New England New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlantic 4 Georgia 1 7 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33 E. Ohio-W. Penn. Southern Michigan Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks
36 40 49 62
Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest 68 Black Hills 75 E. South Dakota Iowa New Orlea~s-Miss. Nashville
. 4 Southwest Plalns Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget
4Sound-lnland
Texas SW. Idaho-E. Oregon Colorado Rio Grande Valley
Orders Combined*
76 79 94 98
106 108 124 125
126 135 137 138
84 153 56 43 15
260 98 75 88 49
113 49 66
266
8 92 40 23 53 15 19 15 76
3 37 o
1,797
* May not add due to rounding. § Less than 0.5 million pounds.
8.8 11.0 8.5 9.4 8.9
10.6 11.5 12.1 8.7
10.7 9.1 9.2 9.8 9.7 5.3 6.5
10.2 9.4
10.2 9.2 5.9
10.4 9.4 9.1 6.3
10.5 0.0
9.8
See footnotes at end of Table I I 1-7.
14 22 11
7
18 41 15 8
13 7
19 6 9
33 O§
12 8 3
10 2 6
4
30 1
10 o
314
8.8 10.7 8.4
10.7 10.3 11.3 13.3 10.9
8.2 13.2 10.6 8.8 9.4
10.2 5.0 6.7
10.7 14.3 12.4 10.6 7.3 8.9 7.6
14.3 5.3
10.2 0.0
10.4
10.0 21.4 12.7 22.8 18.1 10.2 11.5 10.0 11.3 12.4 15.8 15.3 18.1 9.8
10.3 9.0
32.1 17.2 16.~
21.0 25.4 14.5 10.5 29.3 16.6 10.9 0.0
15.7
872 1,243
606 416 154
2,186 753 545 925 410
1,122 483 606
2,474 18
116 806 387 203 524 238 163 . 144 755
45 315
34
16,544
91.2 89.0 91.5 90.6 91.1 89.4 88.5 87.9 91.3 89.~
90.9 90.8 90.2 90.3 94.7 93.5 89.8 90.6 89.8 90.8 94.1 89.6 90.6 90.9 93.8
· 89.5 100.0
90.2
148 180 124
59 161 322
97 68
146 49
157 67 91
294 3
15 104
47 23 85 29 65 52
177 16 91 20
2,691
91.2 89.3 91.6 89.3 89.7 88.7 86.7 89.1 91.8 86.8 89.4 91.2 90.6 89.8 95.0 93.3 89.3 85.7 87.6 89.4 92.7 91.1 92.4 85.7 94.7 89.8
100.0
89.6
-25.6 -26.8 -23.9 -35.1 -29.1 -23.2 -26.1 -26.3 -26.4 -27.1 -29.1 -28.4 -28.1 -25.4 -24.8 -29.8 -28.7 -32.8 -31. 9 -27.9 -30.1 -32.8 -36.3 -29.5 -38.2 -30.6 -30.7
-27.7
956 1,396
662 459 169
2,446 851
162 202 135
67 179 363 111
620 77
1,013 159 459 57
1 ,235 175 532 74 672 101
2,740 327 19 4
124 16 898 117 427 55 226 27 577 95 253 31 182 72 159 56 831 207
48 17 352 101
34 20
18,341 3,005
-23.5 -23.6 -21.8 -31.7 -26.0 -20.5 -22.7 -23.6 -24.3 -23.5 -26.1 -25.9 -25.4 -22.9 -23.6 -28.1 -25.0 -28.5 -28.2 -24.7 -27.8 -30.2 -34.1 -24.6 -36.6 -27.8 -30.7
-24.7
~ r-J rr 11 r--, r-J. ,.., 11 rJ r -, r-, 11 · rJr---"J :1
Table 1II-4. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Fourth Quarter 1984 Versus Fourth Quarter 1983
Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings Farms Marketings Farms Marketings
11 r-, r--"'
All Farms
Average Average Average Federal Order Million change Million change Million change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)
New England New York-New Jersey Middle Atlantic Georgia 1 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional Ohio Valley E. Ohio-W. Penn. Southern Michigan Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks
1
2 4 7
30 33 36 40 49 62
Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest 68 Black Hil Is 75 E. South Dakota Iowa New Orlea~s-Miss. Nashville 4 Southwest Plains Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget
4Sound-lnland
Texas SW. Idaho-E. Oregon Colorado Rio Grnnde Valley
Orders Combined*
76 79 94 98
106 108 124 125 126 135 137 138
129 207 118
72
21 306 117
79 94 51
113 54 91
385 3
18 112
49 31 61 34 18 20 99
7
45 1
2,335
* May not add due to rounding. § Less than 0.5 million pounds.
13.5 15.1 17.9 15.6 11.8 12.5 13.7 12.4 9.3
11.0 9.1
10.4 13.8 14.1 15.8 15.1 13 .1 16.1 13.8 10.6 12.6 9.9
12.4 11.7 14.6 12.8 2.9
12.8
See footnotes at end of Table I I 1-7.
22 29 28 17 40 44 19
8 13
8 16
7
13 49
O§
3 16
9
4 10
4
5 7
35 2
12
~§
421
13.3 15.3 20.4 18.0 20.1 13.2 17.8 11.0 9.0
14.4 9.5 9.8
13.4 15.3 14.7 16.8 14.5 17.2 13.7 11.6 13 .1
8.1 12.8 16.4 10.1 12.7 0.7
14.2
12.7 17.5 11.6 25.8 16.6 10.4 16.2 15.5 16.1 12.9 15.6 17.9 10.0 11.4 4.0
10.7 19.5 20.2 15.0 11.8 19.1 13.6 14.6 24.4 9.5
12.8 9.8
15.2
827 1,161
540 390 157
2,140 737
556 918 411
1,122 465 568
2,355 16
101 744 255 193 517 235 16~
141 748
41 307
33
15,644
86.5 64 . 9 62.1 84.4 68.2 87.5 86.3 87.6 90.7 69.0 90.9 69.6 66.2 85.9 84.2· 64.9 66.9 83.9 86.2 69.4 67.4 90.1 87.6
68.3 85.4 87.2 97.1
67.2
146 161 111
78 156 289
89 66
137 46
155 65 84
271 3
13 94 42 22 80 28 61 45
177 14 81 17
2,534
86.7 84.7 79.6 82.0 79.9 86.8 82.2 69.0 91.0 85.6 90.5 90.2 86.6 84.7 85.3 83.2 65.5 82.8 86.3 68.4 86.9 91. 9 87.2 63.6 69.9 87.3 99.3
85.8
-22.3 -25.3 -19.9 -27.1 -26.9 -21.5 -25.1 -24.7 -24.4 -25.6 -26.8 -26.4 -25.9 -23.8 -27.0 -28.0 -25.0 -34.2 -35.6 -28.1 -29.2 -27.0 -28.9 -27.2 -31.6 -28.6 -27.3
-25.5
956 168 -19.0 1,368 190 -20.9
658 139 -15.0 462 95 -21.2 178 198 -22.8
2,446 334 -18.4 854 108 -20.1 635 75 -21.7
1,012 150 -21.9 462 54 -21.9
1,235 171 -24.1 519 72 -23.6 659 97 -22.5
2,740 320 -19.9 19 3 -23.7
119 16 -23.5 856 110 -20.7 304 51 -28.7 224 26 -31.5 578 91 -25.0 269 32 -25.2 182 66 -24.8 161 52 -25.3 847 211 -21.9
48 15 -26.9 352 92 -25.1
34 18 -27.1
18,179 2,954 -21.6
,---
~ rJ ,....-., r---'} r-, ,. ;-, r---, r-, ,--, ,..., ,..., . 11 r-, -, 11
Table 1II-5. Number of Farms and Milk Harketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, First Quarter 1985 Versus First Quarter 1984
Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings Farms Marketings Farms Marketings
r-1 1 r-l
All Farms
Average Average Average Federal Order Million change Million change Million change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)
New England New York-New Jersey Middle Atlantic Georgia 1 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional Ohio Valley E. Ohio-W. Penn. Southern Michigan Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks
2 4 7
30 33 36 40 49 62
Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest Black Hills E. Sout.h Dakota
Iowa 3 Nashvi11 e
4 Southwest Plains
68 75 76 79 98
106 Central Arkansas 108 Oregon-Washington 124 Puget Sound-Inland 1~5
4 . Texas 126 Central Arizona 131 SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135
Orders Combined*
324 426 269 147
52 786 203 166 264 108 351 158 269 722
9
36 253 135 161
91 60 47
245 8
12
5,302
* May not add due to rounding.
33.9 31.9 41.1 37.4 33.8 34.2 27.7 28.7 29.2 28.2 30.2 31.3 41.5 28.5 50.0 30.3 30.4 32.0 30.7 36.4 32.6 29.2 32.4 17.8 25.0
31.9
See footnotes at end of Table 111-7.
68 73 64 41 83
134 32 23 47 15 57 26 45
111 2 6
38 20 32 14 24 14 52 18
6
1,044
39.7 36.3 46.7 41.2 38.9 38.7 30.7 30.4 32.2 29.5 32.9 36.8 46.5 32.9 46.1 37.0 35.5 37.8 35.6 41.3 35.5 27.4 34.9 23.5 35.2
36.2
10.3 16.9 13.8 21.8 10.0 11.9 11. 1
12.3 11.3 12.0 12.9 12.1 16.7 12.2 6.6
18.7 11.8 14.0 11.7 13~0
10.1 14.5 16.8 12.8 19.9
13.0
632 911 386 246 102
1 ,512 529 413 640 275 813 347 379
1,815 9
83 580 287 364 159 124 114 512 37 36
11,305
66.1 .68.1 58.9 62.6 66.2 65.8 72.3 71.3 70.8 71.8 69.8 68.7 58.5 71.5 50.0 69.7 69.6 68.0 69 . 3 63.6 67 . 4 70.8 67.6 82.2 75.0
68.1
103 127 73 59
131 212
73 52 98 37
116 44 52
227 2
10 70 32 58 20 43 38 98 57 11
1,842
60.3 63.7 53.3 58.8 61.1 61.3 69.3 69.6 67.8 70.5 67.1 63.2 53.5 67.1 53.9 63.0 64.5 62.2 64.4 58.7 64.5 72.6 65.1 76.5 64.8
63.8
-14.9 -18.3 -14.9 -21.7 -23.4 -15.5 -18.6 -18.6 -18.0 -18.4 -17.5 -19.7 -17.6 -18.4 -13.0 -18.2 -21.3 -23.1 -19.0 -18.2 -14.9 -13.1 -20.5 -13.9 -17.8
-18.2
956 1,337
655 393 154
2,290 732 579 904 383
1,164 505 648
2,537 18
119 833 422 525 250 184 161 757 45 48
171 200 138 100 214 345 105 75
145 52
173 70 98
338 3
16 108 52 90 34 67 52
150 75 16
16,607 2,886
- 6.4 - 8.3 - 3.5
8.2 -13.1 - 6.7 -11.3 -11.1 -10.4 -11 .3 - 9.5 -10.3 - 4.5 -10.4 - 4.9 - 7.6 -12.0 -12.3 -10.2 - 7.7 - 7.4 - 7.0 -10.5 - 8.9 - 7.6
- 9.1
.--., ~ r-, ,---, r-, r., r-, -, r-l r--, ,,--, rJ h ~ r ., ;-, rJ r--, r--,
Table III-6. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, 1984 Versus 1983
Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings A 11 Farms Farms Marketings Farms Marketings
Average Average Average Federal Order Mi 11 i on change Mi 11 i on change Mi 11 i on change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent.)
New England New York-New Jersey Middle Atlantic Georgia 1 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional Ohio Valley E. Ohio-W. Penn. Southern Michigan
2
4 7
30 33 36 40 49 Indiana 2
St. Louis-Ozarks 62 Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa Upper Midwest Bl ack Hi 11 s E. South Dakota Iowa New Orlea~s-Miss. Nashville 4 Southwest Plains Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington
65 68 75 76 79 94 98
106 108 124
Puget4Sound-lnland 125
Texas 126 SW. I daho-E. Oregon 135 Colorado 137 Rio Grande Valley 138
Orders Combined*
41 111 37 25 11
116 51 46 44 27 32 29 29
102 2 6
78 31 18 27 11 13 9
53 2
16
968
* May not add due to rounding.
4.3 8.3 5.6 6.4 6.4 5.0 6 . 9 7.9 4.7 7.0 2.7 5.7 4.5 4.0
10.5 5.1 9.2
10.1 7.6 5'.1 4.4 7.1 5.6 7.1 4.2 4.5 3.4
5.6
See footnotes at end of Table 111-7.
29 67 24 25 87 73 26 18 28 17 20 17 16 57
2
4
45 24 8
17 6
16 11 89
3
20 2
752
4.1 8.1 4.4 6.8
10.2 5.0 5.9 5.7 4.5 7.5 2.8 5.8 4.0 4.1
12.9 5.6 9.6 9.5 7.1 4 . 5 4.2 5.5 4.9 9.9 4.0 5.1 3.2
6.0
6.3 12.3 17.6 19.0 14.7 7.0
11.3 11.1
9.1 6.4
14.6 14.6 8.0 7.6 2.6
11.3 15.9 16.8 25.3 12 . 5 25.4 9.0
48.6 24.7 4.2
15.9 0.7
13.7
915 1,231
6'23 366 161
2,195 687 535 884 357
1 ,133 480 619
2,447 17
112 767 276 220 503 240 169 152 690
46 336
28
16,189
95.7 91.7 94.4 93.6 93.6 95.0 93.1 92.1 95.3 93.0 97.3 94.3 95.5 96.0 89.5 94.9 90.8 89.9 92.4 94.9 95.6 92.9 94.4 92.9 95.8 95.5 96.6
94.4
666 765 528 339 766
1,372 424 302 602 211 702 281 381
1,333 12 64
422 229 108 365 133 270 214 813
64 377
75
11 ,817
95.9 91.9 95.6 93.2 89.8 95.0 94.1 94.3 95.5 92.5 97.2 94.2 96.0 95.9 87.1 94.4 90.4 90.5 92.9 95.5 95.8 94.5 95.1 90.1 96.0 94.9 96.8
94.0
-23.2 -21.8 -20.6 -28.0 -22.6 -19.3 -21.9 -21.5 -22.3 -23.3 -24.9 -23.9 -23.4 -21.2 -20.3 -24.2 -22.2 -26.2 -34.8 -23.8 -28.4 -25.1 -27.9 -24.3 -28.7 -28.1 -25.7
-23.1
956 1,342
660 391 172
2,311 738 581 928 384
1,165 509 648
2,549 19
118 845 307 238 530 251 182 161 743
1t8
352 29
17,157
695 832 553 363 853
1,445 451 320 631 228 722 298 397
1,391 14 68
466 253 116 383 139 286 224 902
67 397
77
12,569
-22.3 -19.9 -19.4 -26.0 -19.9 -18.3 -20.6 -20.2 -21.3 -21.7 -24.1 -22.3 -22.5 -20.3 -17.9 -22.8 -19.7 -23.6 -32.5 -22.7 -27.0 -23.7 -26.1 -21.3 -27.8 -26.7 -25.1
-21.6
---, r--l 11 ('""J ...--, r--'J' r, 11 r-, r-j r 1 ,.., , 11 r - 1
Table 111-7. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Second Quarter 1985 Versus Second Quarter 1984
Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings Farms Marketings Farms Marketings
r-, 11 1
All Farms
Average Average Average Federal Order Mi 11 i on change Mi 11 i on change Mi 11 i on change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)
New England 1 New York-New Jersey 2 Georgi a 7 Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33 Indiana 2 49 St. Louis-Ozarks 62 Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa Upper Midwest Bl ack Hi 11 s E. South Dakota
Iowa 4 Southwest Plains Centr~l Arkansas Texas
Orders Combined*
65 68 75 76 79
106 108 126
650 935 265
1,687 497 253 849 374 513
1,938 14 84
562 355 176 456
9,608
* May not add due to rounding.
70.3 70.8 72.8 74.3 67.3 69.1 73.3 76,3 81.3 77 .0 87.5 83.2 74.5 69.2 71.5 61.6
73.1
159 191 87
353 98 50
176 73
107 362
3 17
103 85 35
186
2,085
81.2 78.2 81.:3 82.3 77 .0 80.7 81.9 83.7 87.3 84.6 78.0 91.2 81.4 79.4 82.1 71.8
81.0
26.5 25.5 30.8 24.2 23.3 22.8 26.8 27.2 32.8 27.1 20.1 30.3 27.3 24.3 36.5 27.1
26.6
275 385 99
584 241 113 310 116 118 580
2
17 192 158
70 284
3,544
29.7 29.2 27.2 25.7 32.7 30.9 26.7 23.7 18.7 23.0 12.5 16.8 25.5 30.8 28.5 38.4
26.9
37 53 20 76 29 12 39 14 15 66
2 23 22 8
73
490
18.8 21.8 18.7 17.7 23.0 19.3 18.1 16.3 12.7 15.4 22.0 8.8
18.6 20.6 17.9 28.2
19.0
-15.8 -18.2 -18.7 -12.6 -15.9 -17.8 -19.9 -15.3 -16.8 -16.4 - 9.6 -14.0 -15.1 -18.1 -14.9 -19.9
-16.9
1 Data for Florida producers in the following orders: Southeastern Florida (13); Tampa Bay (12); and Upper Florida (6).
925 196 1,320 245
364 106 2,271 429
738 127 366 62
1,159 215 490 87 631 122
2,518 428 16 4
101 18 754 126 513 107 246 43 740 259
13,152 2,575
15.6 12.4 17.4 15.6 11.3 12.1 14.7 17.6 23.5 17 .. 6
12.0 24.7 16.4 12.3 23.2 9.0
15.1
2 Datil for Missouri and Illinois producers in the following orders: Southern Illinois (32); St. Louis-Ozarks (62); Central Illinois (50); Paducah (99); Southwest Plains (106); and Texas (126). Excludes data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the Chicago Regional Order (30) and Greater Kansas City Order (64).
3 Data for Kentucky and Tennessee producers in the following orders: Tennessee Valley (#11); Louisville-Lexington-Evansvil1e (#46); and Nashville (#98).
4 Excludes data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the order.
r--J
l
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
l [
[
[
[
~..PPENDIX IV
Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Non-Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, 1984/85 Versus 1983/84
I tl '
-, ..--, 11
Table IV-I.
11 rJ 11 r 1 :- 1 r- 1 r-, ,--, 'rJ ,---, ,-, r-,
Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Non-Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, First Quarter 1984 Versus First Quarter 1983
Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings Farms Marketings Farms Marketings
Average Average
r"'J rJ 11
All Farms
Average Federal Order Million change Million change Million change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (per cent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)
New England New York-New Jersey t~iddle Atlantic Georgia 1 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional Ohio Vall ey E. Ohio-W. Penn. Southern Michigan
2
4
7
30 33 36 40 49 Indiana , 2
St. LOuls - 0zarks 62 Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa Upper Midwest Black Hills E. South Dakota Iowa New Orleass-Miss. Nashville 4 Southwest Plains Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget
4Sound-lnland
Texas SW. Idaho-E. Oregon Colorado Rio Grande Valley
Order s Combined*
65 68 75 76 79 94 98
106 108 124 125 126 135 137 138
3,239 9,108 3,263
495 88
8,402 1,988 3,187 3,259 1,095 1,223
372 593
5,615 29
156 1,556
401 225 403 236 427 788 864
97 341
59
47,509
* May not add due to roundjng.
58.9 63.9 54.5 50.8 44.4 60.0 46.5 60.2 69.8 58.3 54.5 52 . 3 55.9 53.8 51.8 59 . 3 59 . 8 15 . 8 48.6 53 . 7 50.9 59.0 65.2 56.1 49.5 45.3 69.4
57.1
See foo tnotes at end of Table IV-7.
727 1,824
765 188 171
1,681 343 519 742 200 233
71 120
1,028 6
32 285 131
34 107 48
231 423 387
53 144 144
10,637
64.1 70.4 58.2 63.4 79.7 64.8 58.2 66.0 78.1 64.2 59.8 57.4 61.5 58.1 50.9 66.5 64.7 56.1 54.5 62.5 55.0 69.3 71.7 66.1 58.4 54.3 75.2
65.0
16.3 15.9 13.4 20.1 16.0 13.4 16.9 17.0 21.7 17.1 16.6 17.5 17.0 12.7 48.1 16.7 19.2 23.3 20.1 19 . 8 25.5 15.0 14.1 22.9 20.5 13.0 18.2
16.1
2,259 5,145 2,719
480 110
5,601 2,288 2,108 1,409
784 1,023
339 468
4,831 27
107 1,044 2,134
238 348 228 297 421 676
99 412
26
35,623
41.1 36.1 45.5 49.2 55.6 40.0 53.5 39.8 30.2 41.7 45.5 47.7 44.1 46.2 48.2 40.7 40.2 84.2 51.4 46.3 49.1 41.0 34.8 43.9 50.5 54.7 30.6
42.9
408 765 549 108
44 913 ,246 267 208 111 157
53 75
741 6
16 155 102
28 64 39
102 167 198 38
121 47
5,731
35.9 29.6 41.8 36.6 20.3 35.2 41.8 34.0 21.9 35.8 40.2 42.6 38.5 41.9 49.1 33.5 35.3 43.9 45.5 37.5 45.0 30.7 28.3 33.9 41.6 45.7 24.8
35.0
-10.9 -11.6 -10.5 -20.1 -20.3 -11.1 -15.0 -12 . 9 -11 .7 -14.7 -14.3 -14.7 -16.3 -11.4 -12.7 -20.3 -13.7 -20.2 -16.7 -14.4 -17.7 -11. 6 -10.8 -13.4 -18.1 -14.2 -10.7
-12.5
5,498 14,253 5,982
975 198
14,003 4,276 5,295 4,668 1,879 2,246
711
1 ,061 10,446
56 263
2,600 2,535
463 751 464 724
1,209 1,540
196 753
85
83,132
1 ,1 36 2,590 1,314
296 214
2,594 589 785 950 311 390 124 196
1,769 12 48
440 233 62
171 87
334 • 590
585 91
265 191
16,368
4.8 6.1 2.0 1.4 6.2 3.4 1.0 4.8
12.4 .3.3 1.9 1.2 1.5 1.2
10.4 1.0 5.0
- 0.5 0.0 4.2 1.5 5 .. 3 5.8 7.7 0.7
- 1.3 9.4
4.1
rJ
r -1 rJ r-l r--, r ~ 1 11 rJ .-, rJ r , '-, ,--, .---, , r 1
Table IV-2. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Non-Participants.), by Their Change in Marketings, Second Quarter 1984 Versus Second Quarter 1983
Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings Farms Marketings Farms Marketings
:J \I 11
All Farms
Average Average Average Federal Order Million change Million change Million change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent . pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)
New England New York-New Jersey Middle Atlantic Georgi a . 1 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional Ohio Valley E. Ohio-W. Penn. Southern Michigan Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks
2
4
7
30 33 36 40 49 62
Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest Black Hills E. South Dakota Iowa New Orlea~s-Miss. Nashvill e
4 Southwest Plains Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget
4Sound-lnland
Texas SW. Idaho-E. Oregon Colorado Rio Grande Valley
Orders Combin~d*
68 75 76 79 94 98
106 108 124 125 126 135 137 138
2,732 7,812 2,774
435 96
7,335 1,825 2,921 2,697
930 1,054
328 484
5,217 30
125 1,368
263 166 406 216 423 711 991
92 341
57
41,829
* May not add due to rounding.
48.9 54.9 46.8 43.5 49 . 0 52.4 38.6 53.2 57.8 49.5 46.9 47.1 46.6 49.9 53.6 48.4 53.8 10.0 36.2 52.1 46.3 57.6 58.2 63.4 46.7 45.8 64.0
49.9
See footnotes at end of Table IV-7.
602 1,654
656 153 159
1,571 329 499 608 176
220 · 68 107 991
8
26 262
24 26
117 49
245 416 509
64 160 141
9,838
53.5 60.9 50.4 54.5 75.9 57.4 50.4 59.5 61.6 55.3 53.8 53.4 52.1 54.3 5~.5
50.9 57.5 42.8 40.2 64.5 52.8 67.3 66.6 76.0 59.1 56.4 66.1
58.2
13.7 13.8 11.9 20.2 17.0 12.2 17.9 15.2 13.6 15.0 15 . 6 16.5 16.1 11.8 25.6 14.4 16.7 17.8 15.1 20.2 23.9 13.9 12.7 31.3 17.6 13.6 14.7
14.6
2,860 6,430 3,155
565 100
6,668 2,903 2,572 1,967
949 1,192
368 555
5,229 26
133 1,175 2,357
292 3}3 251 312 510 571 105 403
32
42,053
51.1 45.1 53.2 56.5 51.0 47.6 61.4 46.8 42.2 50.5 53.1 52.9 53.4 50.1 46.4 51.6 46.2 90.0 63.8 47.9 53.7 42.4 41.8 36.6 53.3 54.2 36.0
50.1
523 1,060
646 127
51 1,164
324 340 379 142 189 59 98
833 7
25 194
32 38 65 44
119 209 160
44 124
72
7,069
46.5 39.1 49.6 45.5 24.1 42.6 49.6 40.5 38.4 44.7 46.2 46.6 47.9 45.7 45.5 49.1 42.5 57.2 59.8 35.5 47.2 32.7 33.4 24.0 40.9 43.6 33.9
41.8
-11.8 -12.3 -11.3 -21.0 -14.6 -12.0 -18.9 -14.0 -11.4 -15.6 -15.9 -17.2 -17.1 -12.6 -15.1 -16.9 -14.4 -21.3 -17.2 -16.9 -19.5 -11 .1
-13.4 -13.3 -17.7 -14.7 - 9.9
-13.3
5,592 14,242 5,929 1,000
196 14,003 4,728 5,493 4,664 1,879 2,246
696 1,039
10,446 56
258 2,543 2,620
458 779 467 735
1 ,221 1,562
197 744
89
83,882
1,125 2,714 1,302
280 210
2,735 653 839 986 318
• 409 128 205
1,824 14 51
456 57 63
182 94
364 624 669 108 284 213
16,907
0.2 1.9
- 0.9 - 2.8
7.4 0.4
- 3.8 1.3 2.5
- 1.0 - 1.5 - 2.0 - 2.6 - 0.8
3. i - 3.5
1.1 - 8.3 - 6.7
3.8 - 1.3
4.3 2.4
16.9 0.1
- 0.7 5.0
1.0
II
,.., ,---,
Table IV-3.
.---, r--l 11 ,.-, , r-, ;--, 11 r-J , r - 1 , ,. 1
Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Non-Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Third Quarter 1984 Versus Third Quarter 1983
Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings Farms Marketings Farms Marketings
r--1 11 ,--,
All Farms
Average Average Average Federal Order Million change Million change Million change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds~ (percent)
New England New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlantic 4 beorgia 1 7 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33 E. Ohio-W. Penn. ~6
Southern Michigan 40 Indiana 2 49 St. Louis-Ozarks 62 Great.er Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest. 68 Black Hills 75 E. South Dakot.a 76 Iowa New Orlea~s-Miss. Nashville ~
Southwest Plains ' Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget
4Sound-lnland
Texas SW. I daho- E. Oregon Colorado Rio Grande Valley
Orders Combined*
79 94 98
106 108 124 125 126 135 137 138
2,581 6,738 2,413
481 84
6,649 1,934 2,638 2,354
835 1,008
296 428
4,977 20 98
1,020 357 211 373 216
432 707 905 107 377
48
38,287
* May not add due to rounding.
45.2 47.6 41.3 45.1 45.7 47.5 41.9 47.3 50.5 44.4 44.9 42.7 42.3 47.6 35.7 38.7 40.6 13.8 46.1 46.8 44.5 57.4 57 . 4 56.0 51.9 50.4 53.3
45.6
See footnotes at end of Table IV-7.
550 1,283
559 109 116
1,370 329 422 560 159 202 58 92
844 5
19 178
99 31 99 44
254 423 405
76 186 115
8,587
52.2 52.8 44.8 57.5 67.4 53.6 54.3 53.8 57.0 53 . 3 52.9 47.6 46.5 54.2 37.1 39.8 44.2 54.4 50.9 58.3 54.1 69.8 67.9 69.6 64.6 64.5 53.9
54.6
13.8 13.5 12.3 i 8.1 19.2 12.5 17.2 14.5 12.6 15.2 15.9 14.1 15.7 13.2 18.0 18.0 17.4 21.4 16.6 20.4 24.2 13.5 14.5 24.5 21.6 14.1 17.0
14.6
3,128 7,425 3,423
585 100
7,354 2,677 2,935 2,309 1,044 1,237
398 584
5,469 36
155 1,493 2,239
247 424 269 320 524 711
99 371
42
45 , 608
54.8 52.4 58.7 54.9 54.3
. 52.5 58.1 52.7 49.5 55.6 55.1 57.3 57.7 52.4 64.3 61.3 59.4 86.2 53.9 53.2 55.5 42.6 42.6 44.0 48.1 49.6 46.7
54.4
503 1,147
689 81 56
1,185 277 362 423 139 180
64 105 713
9
29 224 83 30 71 37
110 200
177 41
102 98
7,135
47.8 47.2 55.2 42.5 32.6 46.4 45.7 46.2 43.0 46.7 47.1 52.4 53.5 45.8 62.9 60.2 55.8 45.6 49.1 41. 7 45.9 30.2 32.1 30.4 35.4 35.5 46.1
45.4
-12.5 -13.0 -12.0 -21.5 -13 .6 -12.5 -19.0 -13.6 -12.4 -15.7 -16.3 -17.6 -17.0 -13 .1
-17 .6
-13.8 -18.5 -29.3 -18.4 -15.1 -19.5 -13.7 -12.9 -15.0 -15 . 7 -16.0 - 8.5
-13.9
5,709 14,163 5,836 1,066
184 14,003 4,611 5,573 4,663 1,879 2,245
694 1 ,012
10,446 56
253 2,513 2,596
458 797 485 752
1,231 1,616
206 748
90
1,053 2,430 1,248
190 171
2,556 606 784 982 298 381 123 197
1,557 14 48
402 181
61 171
81 365 623 582 117
289 214
83,895 15,723
- 0.4 - 0.8 - 2.6 - 2.7
6.1 - 0.6 - 2.6 - 0.4
0.3 - 1.6 - 1.9 - 5.0 - 4.4 - 0.5 - 7.2 - 3.4 - 5.8 - 8.5 - 3.7
2.5 - 0.6
3.6 4.0 9.1 5.1 1.2 3.7
- 0.4
r,
,-, .--, r-l rJ r 1 :- , rJ , ;, r-J ;---, -, r-l --, r-,
Table IV-4. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Non-Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Fourth Quarter 1984 Versus Fourth Quarter 1983
Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings Farms Marketings Farms Marketings
r-J rJ r-l
All Farms
Average Average Average Federa 1 Order Mill i on change Mi 11 i on change Mi 11 i on change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)
New England New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlantic 4 Georgia. 1 7 SE. Florlda, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33 E. Ohio-W. Penn. 36 Southern Michigan 40 Indi ana 49 St. Louis-Ozarks
2 62
Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest. 68 Black Hills 75 E. South Dakota 76 Iowa 79 New Orlea~s-Miss. 94 Nashville 4 98 Southwest Plains 106 Central Arkansas 108 Oregon-Washington 124 Puget
4Sound-lnland 125
Texas 126 SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135 Colorado 137 Rio Grande Valley 138
Orders Combined*
2,643 6,360 2,838
427 82
6,827 2,018 2,682 2,226
830 986 283 453
5,276 21
127 1,137
320 219 368 226 433 693 842 116 312
42
38,787
* May not add due to rounding.
45.1 45.4 48.9 39.5 45.3 48.8 42.4 46.6 47.7 44.2 43.9 41.3 45.9 50.5 37.5 50.6
. 50.5 40.3 48.1 45.6 46.2 56.7 55.6 50.3 55.5 41.7 45.7
47.2
See footnotes at end of Table IV-7.
610 1,188
696 136 144
1,360 337 431 524 157 199
61 101 916
6 28
201 83 34
101 45
223 416 371
80 144 110
8,700
55.8 50.9 54.5 50.9 67.7 57.0 57.0 55.9 55.9 54.1 53.7 50.1 53.5 58.8 45.0 59.2 56.2 48.4 54.8 59 . 1 55.4 65.7 70.1 64.9 68.5 54.4 54.0
56.5
13.0 12.8 10.9 22.2 19.7 12.1 17.0 14.8 11.6 13.8 14.9 14.3 15.1 12.8 11. 1 17.9 15.5 19.9 17 .2 17.5 21.0 13.7 14.3 21.9 18.1 15.7 17.0
13.9
3,219 7,658 2,961
655 99
7,176 2,746 3,073 2,442 1,046 1,259
403 535
5,170 35
124 1 ,115
474 236 439 263 330 554 831
93 437
50
43,425
54.9 54.6 51.1 60.5 54.7 51.2 57.6 53.4 52 . 3 55.8 56.1 58.7 54.1 49.5 62.5 49.4 49.5 59.7 51.9 54.4 53.8 43.3 44.4 49.7 44.5 58.3 54.3
52.8
483 1,145
580 132 68
1,024 255 340 413 133 172
61 88
642 7
19 157
89 28 70 36
116 177 201 37
120 93
6,686
44.2 49.1 45.5 49.1 32.3 43.0 43.0 44.1 44.1 45.9
. 46.3 49.9 46.5 41.2 55.0 40.8 43.8 51.6 45.2 40.9 44.6 34.3 29.9 35.1 31.5 45.6 46.0
43 .5
-12.3 -13.4 -11.5 -21.3 -14.2 -11.9 -17.7 -13.9 -12.5 -15.4 -16.2 -17.5 -17.8 -12.8 -18.7 -13.1 -14.3 -29.3 -21 . 2 -16.4 -18.9 -11.0 -13.6 -15.8 -14.6 -15.1 - 8.1
-13.8
5,862 14,018 5,799 1,082
181 14,003 4,764 5,755 4,668 1,876 2,245
686 988
10,446 56
251 2,252
794 455 807 489 763
1,247 1,673
209 749
92
1,093 2,334 1,276
268 212
2,384 591 771 936 290 371 122 188
1,558 12 47
358 172
62 170
81 339 593 573 117 264 203
82,212 15,385
0.2 - 1.8 - 0.6 - 3.9
6.1 0.3
- 1.0 0 . 1
- 0.5 - 1.8 - 2.0 - 4.1 - 3.0
0.6 7.5 2.9 0.2
-11.8 - 4.0
0.8 - 0.8
3.8 4.3 5.3 5.4
- 0.7 3.9
- 0.1
r-J
--, 11 r-J rJ 11 r--, ,--, rJ :1 r--, ;---, rJ r-J ,--., rl ,., r--)
Table IV-5. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Non-Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, First Quarter 1985 Versus First Quarter 1984
Federal Order Name No.
New England 1 New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlantic 4 Georgia 1 7 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33 E. Ohio-W. Penn. 36 Southern Michigan 40
49 Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks 62 Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa Upper Midwest
65 68
Black Hills 75 E. South Dakota 76 Iowa 79 Nashvi1le
3 4 98
Southwest Plains 106 Central Arkansas 108 Oregon-Washington 124 Puget
4Sound-lnland 125
Texas 126 Central Arizona 131 SW. I daho-E. Oregon 135
Orders Combined*
Number
2,637 6,098 3,199
470 114
6,667 2,070 2,469 2,149
826 1,109
366 583
4,687 36
149 1,197
399 394 239 447 709 793 59
117
37,983
* May not add due to rounding.
Increasing Marke~~s Farms Marketings
Mill ion Average change
Percent pounds Percent (percent)
44.6 44.2 54.5 50.5 65.5 50.8 49.7 46.6 47.7 48.9 52.6 54.0 59.9 47.8 63.2 59.4 54.4 50.6 55.7 54.3 59.0 56.9 55.8 57.8 59.7
49.2
621 1,240
806 165 184
1,398 354 429 520 158 226 76
129 912
10 35
229 71
111 53
239 424 256 175
81
8,901
55.5 49.8 61.0' 58.6 67.1 56.0 58.1 53.9 55.9 55.1 59.6 62.5 66.5 53.8 72.0
68.9 60.6 58.8 64.9 62.2 69.4 70.4 63.6 70.4 78.1
57.4
13.0 12.6 14.2 21. 1 16.2 11.5 17.1 13.5 12.1 13.8 14.6 17.1 14.0 12.0 15.5 20.5 14.5 17.4 16.4 19.6 13.7 13.7 19.5 15.5 19 . 8
13.7
See footnotes at end of Table IV-7.
Number
3,269 7,683 2,674
460 60
6,457 2,095
- 2,830 2,356
863 999 312 391
5,128 21
102 1,004
390 313 201 310 536 629 43 79
39,205
Decreasing Marketings All Farms Farms Marketings
Average Average Mi 11 i on change Mi 11 i on change
Percent pound_s_ Percent _ ~cent_) _ Num~r pouDds* (percent)
55.4 55.8 45.5 49.5 34.5 49.2 50.3 53.4 52.3 51.1 47.4 46.0 40.1 52.2 36.8 40.6 45.6 49.4 44.3 45.7 41.0 43.1. 44.2 42.2 40.3
50.8
499 1,248
516 117 90
1,100 255 367 409 129 153
46 65
781 4
16 149 50 60 32
105 178 147 74 23
6,611
44.5 50.2 39.0 41.4 32.9 44.0 41.9 46.1 44.1 44.9 40.4 37.5 33.5 46.2 28.0 31.1 39.4 41.2 35.1 37.8 30.6 29.6 36.4 29.6 21.9
42.6
-11.8 -13.1 -11.8 -18.3 -12.0 -11.0 -15.7 -13.7 -12.6 -14.8 -14.1 -16.1 -18.0 -12.0 -10.9 -12.5 -16.4 -14.5 -15.3 -19.3 -11.3 -11.0 -15.9 -14.4 -12.5
-12.9
5,906 13,781 5,873
930 174
13,124 4,165 5,299 4,505 1,689 2,108
678 974
9,815 57
251 2,201
789 707 440 757
1,245 1,422
102 196
1,120 2,488 1,323
281 274
2,498 609 795 929 287 379 122 194
1,693 13 51
378 120 170
85 344 602 403 249 104
77,188 15,513
0.4 - 2.0
2.4 0.9 5.1 0.3 0.7
- 0.9 - 0.3 - 1. 1
1.0 2.0 0.8
- 0.5 6.6 7.8 0.0
1.8 2.9 1.2 4.7 5.1 3.7 4.7
10.8
0.6
II I
--. r, .--, ,--, 11' r., ~--, ,-, . ;-, r--J r-J r • .. r--J ---., ' r-1 r-- r-, -r--) :
Table IV-6. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Non-Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, 1984 Versus 1983
Federal Order Name
New England New York-New Jersey Middle Atlantic Georgia 1 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional Ohio Valley E. Ohio-W. Penn. Southern Michigan Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks
No.
2 4 7
30 33 36 40 49 62
Greater Kansas Cit.y 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest 61 ack Hi 11 s E. South Dakota Iowa New Orlea~s-Miss. Nashville 4 Southwest Plains Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington
68 75 76
79 94 98
106 108 124
Puget4Sound-lnland 125
Texas 126 SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135 Colorado 137 Rio Grande Valley 138
Orders Combined*
Number
2,976 7,759 2,753
452 93
7,413 1,957 3,053 2,635
922 1,055
299 463
5,311 26
116 1,198
349 202 404 238 470 778
966 107 318
53
42,366
* May not add due to rounding.
Increasing Marketings Farms Marketings
Mill ion Average change
Percent pounds Percent (percent)
50.9 55.8 47.3 50.8 47.7 56.2 49.2 57.3 57.8 54.1 50.4 44.3 47.9 54.0 46.4 46.6 54.3 43.5 43.4 56.5 53.2 61.6 62.4 69.1 51.2 42.0 63.9
54.0
2,553 6,116 2,598
572 620
6,079 1,338 1,985 2,395
688 833 238 401
3,806 25
102 840 397 121 443 191
1,012 1,794 1,752
277 615 545
38,335
56.9 61.4 51.0 58.2 74.7 60.4 55.6 61.7 62.7 58.4 55.2 49.1 53.2 57.9 46.6 54.0 56.8 49.9 48.0 64 . 6 56.1 71. 2 73.0 74.3 62.0 56.2 66.8
60.1
11.4 11. 1 10.2 15.9 16.7 8.7
13.2 11.3 9.5
10.9 11.2 11.7
11.2 8.5
18.0 11.6 12.9 18.0 11.6
16.8 19.6 14.5 12.9 23.7 22.9 11 .5 13.9
11 .6 .
See footnotes at end of Table IV-7.
Number
2,869 6,146 3,069
438 102
5,784 2,023 2,271 1,927
781 1,039
376 504
4,524 30
133 1,007
453 263 311 209 293 469 432 102 439
30
36,024
Decreasing Marketings All Farms Farms Market.ings
Average Average Mi 11 i on change Mi 11 i on change
Percent pounds Percent (per~e~Number pouncjs* (percent)
49.1 44.2 52.7 49.2 52.3 43.8 50.8 42.7 42.2 45.9 49.6 55.7 52.1 46.0 53.6 53.4 45.7 56.5 56.6 43.5 46.8 38.4 37.6 30.9 48.8 58.0 36.1
46.0
1,935 3,845 2,492
412 209
3,984 1,069 1,233 1,423
490 676 247 353
2,765 28 87
639 399 131 243 149 409 664 606 169 479 271
25,409
43.1 38.6 49.0 41.8 25.3 39.6 44.4 38.3 37.3 41.6 44.8 50.9 46.8 42.1 53.4 46.0 43.2 50.1 52.0 35.4 43.9 28.8 27.0 25.7 38.0 43.8 33.2
39.9
-10.6 - 8.4 - 8.4 -15.3 - 9.7 - 8.2 -11.9 - 9.8 - 8.4 -11 .6 -11 .4 -11.9 -12.9 - 8.5 -13.0 -11.5 - 9.9 -18.3 -14.0 -11.9 -11.7 -12.6 -15.6 - 9.5 -19.3 -13.4 - 8.3
- 9.9
5,845 13,905 5,822
890 195
4,488 9,961 5,091
984 830
13 ,197 10,062 3,980 2,406 5,324 3,218 4,562 3,818 1,703 1,178 2,094
675 967
9,835 56
249 2,205
802 465 715 447 763
1,247 1,398
209 757
83
1,510 486 754
6,572 53
188 1,479
796 251 686 340
1,421 2,459 2,358
446 1,094
817
78,390 63,745
0.7 2.7 0.2 0.4 8.7 1.3 0.5 2.2 2.1 0.3
- 0.2 - 1.7 - 1.6
0.7 - 0.9
0.4 1.8
- 3.5 - 3.4
4.7 3.5 5.1 3.5
13.0 2.5
- 1.0 5.4
1.9
-. r--1 .--, r--1 r-J iJ ' r-l r r-, :~ : ' r-, ,r-1 , r-1 r ~ 1 " r-, r--J " - '. --...~ "'> ',1 . . • :"_ ... ..;, ;,
'~~4 _ , ~ : , . : :
........ ...: ...:..:. .. -"'- -.... -
Table IV-7. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Non-Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Second Quarter 1985 Versus Second Quarter 1984
-_. '-- -"'--"'-':"
Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings All Farms Farms Marketings Farms Marketings
Average Average Average Federal Order Million change Million change Million change
Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)
New England 1 New York-New Jersey 2 Georgia 7 Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33
49 Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks 62 Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa Upper Midwest Black Hills E. South Dakota Iowa 4 Southwest Plains Centr~l Arkansas Texas
Orders Combined*
65 68 75 76 79
106 108 126
3,376 7,890
570 8,155 2,645
982 1,257
444 698
6,001 39
178 1,307
424 250 656
34,872
* May not add due to rounding.
57.7 57.9 64.2 63.0 64.6 61.6 60.8 68.2 73.6 61.9 70.9 79.1 65.6 61.2 58.7 45.7
61.0
789 1,718
196 1,877
487 202 276 101 169
1,235 12 43
273 124 62
333
7,897
66.2 63.4 71.6 68.5 72.4 68.4 67.6 76.2 78.7 67.4 79.0 81.8 72.2 67.7 66.5 52.1
66.7
16.8 14.1 23.9 13.5 19.7 16.3 16.8 19.7 21.7 13.8 16.7 24.3 18.0 19.1 19.7 20.0
15.7
2,479 5,742
318 4,789 1,448
613 812 207 251
3,698 16 47
684 269 176
779
22,328
42.3 42.1 35.8 37.0 35.4 38.4 39.2 31.8 26.4 38.1 29.1 20.9 34.4 38.8 41.3 54.3
39.0
403 992
78 863 185 94
132 31 46
597 3
10 105 59 31
306
3,936
33.8 36.6 28.4 31.5 27.6 31.6 32.4 23.8 21.3 32.6 21.0 18.2 27.8 32.3 33.5 47.9
33.3
-12.3 -12.0 -16.6 -10.7 -15.2 ~14.4
-16.3 -15.0 -13.4 -10.7 -13.9 - 7.2 -13.7 -14.8 -16.5 -20.2
-12.9
Data for Florida producers in the following orders: Southeastern Florida (13); Tampa Bay (12); and Upper Florida (6).
5,855 13,632
888 12,944 4,093 1,595 2,069
651 949
9,699 55
225 1,991
693 426
~
1 ,192 2,710
274 2,740
672 296 408 132 215
1,832 16 53
379 183 93
639
57,200 11,834
5.0 2.9 8 . 9 4.6 7.5 4.5 3.5 9.1
12.0 4.5 8.6
17.1 7.1 5.6 4.5 3.3
4.3
2 Data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the following orders: Southern Illinois (32); St. Louis-Ozarks (62); Central Illinois (50); Paducah (99); Southwest Plains (106); and Texas (126). Excludes data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the Chicago Regional Order (30) and Greater Kansas City Order (64).
3 Data for Kentucky and Tennessee producers in the following orders: Tennessee Valley (#11); Louisvi11e-Lexington-Evansvi11e (#46); and Nashville (#98).
4 Excludes data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the order.