mars or bust preliminary design review

148
Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review 12/8/03

Upload: gage

Post on 13-Jan-2016

53 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review. 12/8/03. Mission Description. Based on the Design Reference Mission from NASA ( Hoffman and Kaplan, 1997; Drake, 1998 ) Modified to narrow scope of project. Key Assumptions for Design. Only first uncrewed Habitat Focusing on surface operations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

12/8/03

Page 2: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Mission Description

• Based on the Design Reference Mission from NASA (Hoffman and Kaplan, 1997; Drake, 1998)

• Modified to narrow scope of project

Page 3: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review
Page 4: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Key Assumptions for Design

• Only first uncrewed Habitat

• Focusing on surface operations– Launch, transit, Mars entry not designed

• Interfaces with external equipment– Rovers, power supply, ISRU unit

• Crew will use Habitat on arrival

Page 5: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Overall Project Goal

• Establish a Martian Habitat capable of supporting humans

Page 6: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Overall - Level 1 Requirements

• Support crew of 6

• Support 600 day stay without re-supply

• Maintain health and safety of crew

• Minimize dependency on Earth

Page 7: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Launch and Deployment Requirements

• 80 metric ton launch vehicle• Recommended Total Habitat Mass < 34,000

kg (includes payload)• Deploys 2 years before first crew• Land, deploy, operate, maintain all systems• Setup and check-out before crew arrives• Standby mode for 10 months between crews• Operational lifetime of greater than 15 years

Page 8: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Redundancy Requirements

• Mission critical: 2-level redundancy• Life critical: 3-level redundancy• Auto fault detection and correction• Modular• Easily repairable• Electronic and mechanical equipment

– Highly autonomous– Self-maintained or crew maintained– If possible self-repairing

• All systems in Habitat must have low failure rates

Page 9: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Operations Requirements

• Gather information about Mars

• Ease of learning– System similarity

– Common software and hardware

• Real time science activity planning

• Integrate In-Situ Resource Utilization System

Page 10: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Mission Architecture

• Systems Engineering and Integration• Structures• Command, Control, and Communications (C3)• Power Distribution and Allocation• Environment Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS)• Mission Operations and Crew Accommodations• Automation and Robotic Interfaces• Extra Vehicular Activity Systems (EVAS) • Thermal Control• In-situ Resource Utilization Unit (ISRU) and Mars

Environment

Page 11: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Organizational Chart

Project Manager

Systems Engineering and Integration

Structures CCC ECLSS EVASRobotics

and Automation

Power Thermal

Mission OperationsCrew Accommodations

ISRU

Page 12: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Systems Engineering and Integration Team

• Primary:– Juniper Jairala– Tim Lloyd– Tyman Stephens

• Support:– Meridee Silbaugh– Jeff Fehring– Keith Morris

Page 13: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Systems Engineering and Integration Responsibilities

• Establish habitat system requirements

• Delegate top-level subsystem requirements

• Review and reconcile all subsystem design specifications

• Ensure that all habitat subsystem requirements are met

• Ensure proper subsystem interfaces

Page 14: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review
Page 15: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

DRM Mass Recommendations

Subsystem Mass Estimate [kg]

Structure 20,744

Power 3250

ECLSS 4661

Thermal 550

Crew Accommodations 5000

C3 320

EVAS 1629

Total 34,000

Page 16: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Mars Environment and In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU)

Primary

• Heather Chluda

Support

• Keagan Rowley

• Keric Hill

Page 17: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Mars Environment Summary

• Responsible for collecting data on the Mars Environment

• Provides a consistent data set on the Mars Environment for the Habitat design group to use.

• Thermal, Radiation, Pressure, Atmosphere, Wind, etc.

Page 18: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Mars Environment Characteristics

Parameters Maximum Minimum AverageGravity (m/s2) 3.758 3.711 3.735Atmosphere Pressure (millibars) 10 4 8Temperature (C) 27 -143 -63Radiation Skin dose (BFO) (cSv/day) 24.7 (22.3) 21.2 (19.7)Wind Speeds (kph) 36 0Wind Storms Speeds (kph) 127

Environmental Characteristic Ranges on Mars

The Habitat will encounter a wide range of environment characteristics during its surface stay on Mars

Page 19: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Temperatures

• Diurnal variation at Viking Lander sites• Seasonal variation: -107 to -18°C winter to summer

lows

Page 20: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Radiation

• GCR BFO dose equivalent for solar min and max vs. altitude

SPE Dose:5 cSv/yr

GCR BFO Dose:22.3 cSv/yr

GCR Skin Dose:24.7 cSv/yr

LEO BFO Limit:50 cSv/yr

LEO Skin Limit:300 cSv/yr

Page 21: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Martian Atmospheric Constituents

Atmospheric Composition Gas Abundance (%)

Carbon Dioxide 95.32

Nitrogen 2.7

Argon 1.6

Oxygen 0.13

Carbon Monoxide 0.08

Water Vapor 0.03

Neon 0.00025

Krypton 0.00003

Xenon 0.000008

Ozone 0.000004

Page 22: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Future Considerations

• More detailed temperature and radiation data for specific landing site

• Determination of topography of landing site and exploration area

• More detailed information from upcoming Mars missions

Page 23: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

ISRU Subsystem Summary

• Responsible for interface between habitat and ISRU plant

• ISRU will provide additional oxygen, nitrogen, and water for habitat use

• Non-critical system, demonstration for future mission use

Page 24: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

ISRU Level 2 Requirements

• Provide additional nitrogen, water and oxygen• Byproducts of propellant production used as backup oxygen,

nitrogen, and water• Storage tanks and pipes for the ISRU shall tolerate leaks within

limits• Propellant production shall be automated• Acceptable temperatures shall be maintained in storage tanks

and piping• Storage interfaces must be compatible with habitat• Pumping systems shall have adequate power to transport

oxygen, nitrogen and water to the habitat• Piping and storage tanks must be shielded from Mars

Environment• Connections to storage tanks and ISRU tanks must be

performed using robots or humans

Page 25: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

ISRU I/O Diagram

Page 26: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

ISRU Functional Diagram

Page 27: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

ISRU Interface Technologies

Component #Mass (kg)

Add. Mass (kg)

Total Mass (kg)

Power (kW)

Total Power (kW)

Volume (m3)

Total Volume

(m3)

Water Pump 1 70.50   70.50 70.50 70.50    

Oxygen Pump 1 0.94   0.94 1.50 1.50    

Nitrogen Pump 1 0.94   0.94 1.50 1.50    

Water Pipe 1 70.00 10.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.65

Oxygen Pipe 1 70.00   70.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.65

Nitrogen Pipe 1 70.00   70.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.65

Hydrogen Pipe 1 70.00   70.00 1.50 1.50 0.65 0.65

Valves and Connections 9 42.00   42.00 5.00 5.00   0.00

Grand Totals       404.38   80.00   2.60

Page 28: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

ISRU Requirement Verification

Requirement Description Design

Provide additional nitrogen, water and oxygen Extract N2, O2, and H2O from the Martian atmosphereByproducts of propellant production used as backup oxygen, nitrogen, and water Use In-Situ Resource Propellant Production to provide Storage tanks and pipes for the ISRU shall tolerate leaks within limits

Estimated .1 kg/day N2 and .03 kg/day O2 leakage, will purge pipes when not transfering to Habitat

Propellant production shall be automatedCommands and telemetry sent to ISPP plant when extra consumables are needed

Acceptable temperatures shall be maintained in storage tanks and piping Heaters will be supplied to the water pipe line to ensure no freezing

Storage interfaces must be compatible with habitat Proper connections on the pipes will be usedPumping systems shall have adequate power to transport oxygen, nitrogen and water to the habitat

.5 KW provided to the ISRU subsystem is adequate for the low mass flowrate pumping needs

Piping and storage tanks must be shielded from Mars Environment

Insulation coating on pipes or as a future task, bury the pipes underneath the surface for radiation protection

Connections to storage tanks and ISRU tanks must be performed using robots or humans

robots are capable or connecting pipe lines, connection by humans requires an EVA

Page 29: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

ISRU Plant Trade Study

ISRU Plant Type

W/kg of product

Products Advantages Disadvantages

Zirconia Electrolysis

1710 O2 Simple operation

Many fragile tubes required

Sabatier Electrolysis

307 CH4

O2 (H2O)

High Isp Requires H2

Cryogenic Storage

Non-ideal mixture ratio

RWGS Methane

307 CH4

O2 (H2O)

Ideal mixture ratio

Requires H2

Cryogenic Storage

RWGS Ethylene

120 C2H4

O2 (H2O)

Non-cryogenic

High Isp

Requires ½ x H2

RWGS Methanol

120 CH3OH

O2 (H2O)

Non-cryogenic

Low flame Temp.

Requires 2 x H2

Lower Isp

Page 30: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Future Considerations

• Radiation shielding effects of Martian soil– Safe haven soil shelter designs

• Mass benefits of using ISRU plant for consumables on future missions

Page 31: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Structures Subsystem Team

• Primary:– Jeff Fehring– Eric Schleicher

• Support:– Jen Uchida– Sam Baker

Page 32: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Structures Subsystem

• Overall layout

• Volume allocation

• Pressurized volume

• Physically support all subsystems

• Radiation shielding

• Micro-meteoroid shielding

• Withstand all loading environments

Page 33: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Level 2 Requirements

• Fit within the dynamic envelope of the launch vehicle– Launch Shroud Diameter = 7.5 m– Length = 27.7 m

• Structurally sound in all load environments – Acceleration– Vibration– Pressure

• Easily repairable• Stably support all other systems• Interface with other systems• Structures Mass < 20744 kg

Page 34: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Structures Inputs and Outputs

• Heat escapes through the structure

• Cabin air escapes through the structure

• Trace contaminants from the structure

• Telemetry data collected by CCC

Page 35: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Structures Overview

• Pressure Shell• Trusses• Leg Supports• Chassis and Wheels• Radiation Shielding

– Safe haven• Supports for other subsystem components• Other Structures

– Hatches– Vents– Windows– Seals

Page 36: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Overall Layout

Airlocks (3)

Top Floor: personal space, crew

accommodations

Bottom Floor: lab, equipment, storage,

safe haven

ECLSS Tanks

Radiator Panels

Chassis, wheels, and leg supports

underneath habitat

Page 37: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Volume Allocation

Subsystem Volume (m3)Structure 150.00

ECLSS 65.00

Thermal 40.00

EVAS 40.00

Robotics 15.00

Power 30.00

ISRU Interface 4.00

CCC 5.00

Crew Accommodations 50.00

Empty 216.75

Totals 615.75216

Page 38: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Pressure Shell

• Assume aluminum shell• Assume a hollow cylinder, radius 3.5 m• Thickness t = P*r/fy = 1.7 mm for 10.2

psi• Assume pressure shell holds 34 tonnes• Assume launch forces similar to Atlas V• Minimum thickness = 3 mm for stability• Internal trusses carry part of the load

Page 39: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Supports

• Assume 6 hollow tube leg supports• Support entire mass of Habitat on Mars

– Mars gravity = 3.758 m/s2

– Weight = 128 kN• Maintain stability in Martian wind storm

– Maximum wind speed = 127 kph– Maximum wind force = 17 kN

• Maximum compressive force = 54.5 kN/leg• Dimensions of leg to minimize mass:

– Length = 2 m– Radius = 13 cm– Thickness = 1 mm

Page 40: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Mass, Power, and Volume Estimates

Component # Mass (kg)Add.

Mass (kg)Total Mass

(kg)Volume

(m3)

Add. Volume

(m3)

Total Volume

(m3)

Pressure Shell 1 3123.28 1561.64 4684.91 1.15 0.29 1.44Raidiation Shielding 1 3903.43 1951.71 5855.14 3.90 0.98 4.88Top Floor floor structure 1 362.76 181.38 544.15 26.00 6.50 32.50Bottom Floor floor structure 1 362.76 181.38 544.15 26.00 6.50 32.50Primary load bearing center truss 1 209.29 104.65 313.94 15.00 3.75 18.75Chassis 1 69.76 34.88 104.64 5.00 1.25 6.25Wheels 6 212.06 106.03 318.09 0.24 0.06 1.77Leg supports 6 25.41 12.70 38.11 0.11 0.03 0.80Radiator supports 4 80.00 40.00 120.00 0.50 0.13 2.50Secondary floors 2 78.00 39.00 117.00 0.52 0.13 1.30Secondary walls 30 168.75 84.38 253.13 0.08 0.02 2.81Supports for other subsystem components 1 500.00 250.00 750.00 10.00 2.50 12.50

Totals 13643.25 118.00

Page 41: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Requirements Verification

Requirement Description DesignFit within the dynamic envelope of the launch vehicle

0.25 m between undeployed Habitat and launch shroud

Launch Shroud Diameter = 7.5 m Habitat Diameter = 7 m Length = 16.3 m Length = 16 mStructurally sound in all load environments

All loads are supported with a 1.4 factor of safety

Acceleration Internal trusses, chassis, and leg supports on Mars

Vibration Internal trusses and pressure shell during launch

Pressure Pressure Shell holds a differential pressure of 10.2 psi

Easily repairable Not within scope of projectStably support all other systems Airlock, radiator, and ECLSS tank

supports designedStructures Mass < 20744 kg Predicted structure mass = 13477 kg

Page 42: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Future Considerations

• Design for launch loads from Magnum vehicle

• Optimize truss structure

• Fully design supports for all components

Page 43: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Power Distribution and Allocation Subsystem Team

• Primary:– Tom White– Jen Uchida

• Support:– Nancy Kungsakawin– Eric Dekruif

Page 44: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Power

• Interface with the nuclear power source and other external equipment

• Safely manage and distribute power throughout Martian habitat

Page 45: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Level 2 Requirements

• Supply sufficient power with 3-level redundancy• Supply power while reactors are being put online• Transfer power from reactor to habitat• Distribute power on a multi-bus system• Provide storage and interfaces for rovers/EVA suits• Interface with transit vehicle power sources• Regulate voltage to a usable level• Include a fault protection system• Provide an emergency power cutoff• Mass must not exceed 3249 kg (including in-transit

power)

Page 46: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Input/Output

• Input:– Power from reactor– Info/control from

CCC

• Output:– Power to habitat– Heat to thermal

All SubsystemsThermal

CCC

EPDS

PS

Cargo Lander

Heat Power

Power

Power

Info/control

Info/control

Habitat

Page 47: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Mars Surface Power Allocation

•Allotted ~25kW

•Potential to use power allocated to other systems (DRM)

Page 48: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Overview of SystemPower Profile

Page 49: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

System Schematic

Reactor

ChargeControl

Storage

ConditioningRegulation

Distribution

ECLSS ThermalEVAS

Robotics

StructuresMission

OpsCCC

Life/Mission Critical Sys.

Reactor

Bus 3

Bus 2

Bus 1

Page 50: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Mass/Volume

Page 51: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Level 2 Requirements Verification

Page 52: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Future Considerations

• More detailed power profile

• Specified hardware

• Decrease system mass

• Electromagnetic interference

Page 53: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

ECLSS Team

• Primary– Teresa Ellis – Nancy Kungsakawin– Meridee Silbaugh

• Support– Bronson Duenas– Juniper Jairala– Christie Sauers

Page 54: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

ECLSS Responsibilities

• Provide a physiologically acceptable environment for humans to survive and maintain health

• Provide and manage the following:• Environmental conditions• Food• Water• Waste

Page 55: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Level 2 Requirements for ECLSS

• Provide adequate atmosphere, gas composition, and pressure control for human health

• Must have necessary gas storage for mission duration

• Provide Trace Contaminant Control• Provide Temperature and Humidity Control• Must have Fire Detection and Suppression• Must supply entire crew with adequate sources

and amounts of potable water for 600 days on Mars

Page 56: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Level 2 Requirements (Continued)

• Supply entire crew with adequate sources and amounts of food for 600 days on Mars.

• Collect and store liquid, solid, and concentrated wastes for immediate and/or delayed resource recovery.

• Provide adequate supply of hygiene water.

• Mass must not exceed 4661 kg.

Page 57: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Human Inputs and Outputs

O2

Potable H2O

Food

Hygiene H2O

N2

Heat

CO2

Respired & Perspired H2O

Sweat Solids

Urine (solids & liquids)

Feces (solids & liquids)

Atmosphere SystemWater SystemWaste SystemFood System

Page 58: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Atmosphere System

crew cabin

cabinleakage

N2 & O2

O2

N2 storagetanks

EDC*2

N2

FDS

To: hygiene water tank

T&Hcontrol

H2 O

To: vent CO2

To: trash compactor

SPWE TCCA

To: vent H2

H2 & O

2

From: H2O tank

Page 59: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Water System

Page 60: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Food System

To: trash compactor

trash

potablewater

microwave water

food preparation

food & drinkfood

waste &packaging

foodstorage

H2O

refrigerator

Page 61: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Waste System

To: waste water tank

feces

CommodeUrinal

compactor

From: TCCA food trash microfiltration VCD

trash

fecalstorage

solid wastestorage

compactor

urine

H2O

Page 62: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Waste System Schematic

Fecal matter Storage outside

the habitat ( for future usage)

Crew member dumps

non-fecal trashAir Lock

Commode withbuilt-in Fecal

Genie Compactor

Feces inUV-biodegradable bags

Feces in Storage bags

EVA dump

UV

Compactor Compacted Trash

Trash in Storagebags

Crew member is taking out the trash

Non-Fecal matter Storage Structure outside the

habitat

Page 63: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

ECLSS Integrated Design

Atmosphere System

WasteSystem

FoodSystem

WaterSystem

AtmosphericCondenser

Urine

CompactorSolid Waste

Storage

TCCA

FoodTrash

Crew Accommodations (shower, washer, etc.)

& EVA (EMU cooling)

FoodPreparation

FecalSPWE

Vent to

Mars Atm.

H2

EDC

Compactor

Pretreatment Oxone, Sulfuricacid

Pretreated Urine

VCD

AES Brine water

Ultra Filtration

RO

Milli Q

MCV Iodine

Monitoring

Hygiene Water

Iodine Removal Bed

ISE Monitoring

Potable Water

Page 64: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

ECLSS Total M,P,V Estimates

Subsystem

Mass technology

(kg)

Mass consumable

(kg)

Volume technology

(m^3)

Volume consumable

(m^3)Power (kW)

Atmosphere 3335.97 4892.74 16.588 5.589 3.533

Water 890.935 9607.42 3.255 19.0087 2.01

Food 327.91 11088 2.42 31.68 3.8

Waste 277.765 828 2.063 2.88 0.22

Total 4832.58 26415.88 24.326 59.157 9.563

Page 65: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review
Page 66: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Verification of Level 2 Requirements – key design drivers

Requirement Description Design

Shall provide adequate atmosphere, gas composition, and pressure control for human health.

Ptotal: 10.2 psia, ppO2: 2.83-3.35 psia (normoxic) provided via SPWE, EDC removes CO2 at sufficient rate to offset 0.85 kg/person/day generated by crew

Must have necessary Gas Storage for mission duration.Total water supplied to produce oxygen: 4314 kg, O2 tank: 3867.97 kg, N2 tank: 1024 kg

Must provide Trace Contaminant Control.

TCCA ensures SMAC levels of 7 mg/m3 ammonia, 0.9 mg/m3 nitric oxide, 3800 mg/m3 methane, 340 mg/m3 ethylene, and 0.2 mg/m3 benzene

Shall provide Temperature and Humidity Control.Temperature maintained at 18.3C – 26.7C; Humidity maintained at 25%-70%

Must have Fire Detection and Suppression.FDS operates quickly and reliably to avoid both direct (life and limb) and indirect (oxygen consumption) hazards

Must supply entire crew with adequate sources and amounts of potable water for 600 days on Mars. Total water potable water supplied: 1584 kgMust supply entire crew with adequate sources and amounts of food for 600 days on Mars. Total food supplied: 11,088 kg

Shall be able to collect and store liquid, solid, and concentrated wastes for immediate and/or delayed resource recovery.

Liquid wastes pass from urinal/food prep and processed by water system, fecal wastes collected from commode and stored outside for future fertilizer, solid wastes collected from compactors and stored outside

Must provide adequate supply of hygiene water. Total hygiene water supplied: 7811.1 kg

Mass must not exceed 4661 kg.Requirement not met - Total consumables mass: 26,034 kg; Total technologies mass: 6611 kg

Page 67: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Future Considerations

• More detailed calculations of consumables• Consider other technologies that currently have low

TRL• More research on information about the technologies

(M,P,V, FMEA, safety etc.)• Optimize the integrated design• Minimize power, mass , volume• Consider other psychological effects which will factor

into the design of the ECLSS subsystem (type of food, location of each subsystem and waste processing procedure etc.)

Page 68: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Thermal Control Subsystem Team

• Primary– Keagan Rowley– Sam Baker

• Support– Heather Chluda– Heather Howard

Page 69: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Thermal Subsystem Summary

• Responsible for maintaining heat balance

• Collects, transfers, and rejects heat to Mars environment

• Thermal capacity estimated from Power usage of habitat

• Mass, Power, and Volume estimated from equations in Larson and Pranke, 2000

Page 70: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Thermal System Requirements

• Maintain a heat balance with all subsystems over all Martian temperature extremes

• Keep equipment within operating limits• Must be autonomous.• Accommodate transit to Mars.• Auto-deploy and activate if it is inactive during transit• Report status for communication to Earth at all times

(for safety concerns).• Mass shall not exceed 5000 kg.• Thermal Protections System shall be provided by the

launch shroud system.

Page 71: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Thermal I/O Diagram

Page 72: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Overview

• Cool each subsystem’s electronics• Cold plates to collect heat• Fluid loops to transfer heat• Radiators to reject heat• Subsystem capacity sized for hot-hot

scenario• Lowest operating limits from cold-cold

scenario

Page 73: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Thermal Schematic

Page 74: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Example Calculations

• Thermal Load

• Area of Radiators

• Mass of Radiators

• Volume of Radiators

Page 75: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Thermal Load

Est. Heat Load = Power Load + Human Load

Heat Load = 1.15*Est. Heat Load (Degradation)

Total Heat Load = 1.1*Heat Load (Safety Factor)

Est. Heat Load = 25 KW + 3.5 KW = 28.5 KWHeat Load = 28.5*1.15 = 32.8 KWTotal Heat Load = 32.8*1.1 = 36.1 KW

Page 76: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Area of Radiators

AQ

(Tr4 Te

4 )

Where Q is the Total Heat Load, is the Stefan-Boltzmann Constant, is the emissivity, is the raditator efficiency, Tr is the radiator temperature and Te is the environment temperature.

Q = 36100 W

= 5.67e-8 W/(m2K4)

= 0.9, = 0.85

Tr = 290 K, Te = 263 K

A = 364.2 m2

Human Spaceflight pp 519 - 524

Page 77: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Mass and Vol. of Radiators

8.5 kg/m2 for two sided deployable0.06 m3/m2 for two sided deployable

Mass = 8.5 * Area = 8.5 * 364.2Mass = 3087.2 kg

Volume = 0.06*Area = 0.06*364.2Volume = 21.79 m3

Human Spaceflight pp 519 - 524

Page 78: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Thermal Components HOT

Design Total Watts Watt/PanelHOT/HOT 36053 9013.1

Item #Power (W)

Surface Area (m^2)

Volume (m^3)

Mass (kg)

Radiators 4.0 0.0 363.2 21.79 3087.2Heat Exchangers 3.0 0.0 n/a 0.18 78.0Pumps External 12.0 829.2 n/a 1.84 519.2Pumps Internal 3.0 829.2 n/a 0.46 519.2ECLSS Cold Plates 1.0 9100.0 n/a 0.25 109.20ECLSS Air/Heat Exchanger 1.0 5000.0 n/a 0.14 60.00CCC Cold Plates 1.0 1909.0 n/a 0.05 22.91EVAS Cold Plates 1.0 6000.0 n/a 0.17 72.00Robotic & Auto Cold Plates 1.0 3000.0 n/a 0.08 36.00Mission Ops Cold Plates 1.0 6000.0 n/a 0.17 72.00Thermal Cold Plates 1.0 1658.4 n/a 0.05 19.90Instruments n/a n/a 229.8Plumbing and Valves n/a n/a 689.3Fluids n/a n/a 229.8Heat Pumps n/a n/a

TOTALS: 32667.4 363.2 25.18 5744.5

Page 79: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Thermal Components COLD

Design Total Watts Watt/PanelCOLD/COLD 26988.0 6747

Item #Power (W)

Surface Area (m^2)

Volume (m^3)

Mass (kg)

Radiators 4.0 0.0 363.2 21.79 3087.2Heat Exchanger 2.0 0.0 n/a 0.18 78.0Pumps External 12.0 620.7 n/a 1.38 388.6Pumps Internal 3.0 620.7 n/a 0.34 388.6ECLSS Cold Plates 1.0 9100.0 n/a 0.25 109.20ECLSS Air/Heat Exchanger 1.0 1500.0 n/a 0.04 18.00CCC Cold Plates 1.0 1388.0 n/a 0.04 16.66EVAS Cold Plates 1.0 6000.0 n/a 0.17 72.00Robotic & Auto Cold Plates 1.0 3000.0 n/a 0.08 36.00Mission Ops Cold Plates 1.0 6000.0 n/a 0.17 72.00Thermal Cold Plates 1.0 1241.4 n/a 0.03 14.90Instruments n/a n/a 214.1Plumbing and Valves n/a n/a 642.2Fluids n/a n/a 214.1Heat Pumps n/a n/a

TOTALS: 28229.4 363.2 24.48 5351.6

Page 80: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Verification of Requirements

Requirement:• Must maintain a heat

balance with all subsystems over all Martian temperature extremes.

• Must keep equipment within operating limits.

• Must be autonomous.• Must accommodate transit to

Mars.

Verification:• Sized for max anticipated

heat load plus safety factor. • Cold plates provided to cool

each subsystem. • Operates autonomously

except for periodic maintenance.

• Collect heat during transit and transfer to transit vehicle for dissipation.

Page 81: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Verification of Requirements

Requirement:• Must auto-deploy and

activate if it is inactive during transit

• Must report is status for communication to Earth at all times (for safety concerns).

• Mass shall not exceed 5000 kg.

• Thermal Protections System shall be provided by the launch shroud system.

Verification:• Radiators will auto-

deploy. Rest of subsystem active during transit.

• Sensors interface with C3 for status monitoring and transmission to Earth.

• 5,700 kg mass• TPS not included in

design.

Page 82: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Future Considerations

• Determination of detailed Thermal Loads

• Optimization of scenarios

Page 83: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Mission Operations and Crew Accommodations Team

• Primary:• Christie Sauers

• Support:• Tim Lloyd• Tyman Stephens

Page 84: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Mission Ops Responsibilities

• Identify and coordinate crew operations• Create and modify the operations schedule• Support the mission objectives through crew

activities• Establish clear hardware operational

requirements and facilitate changes• Identify and deliver relevant system status data

to onboard crew• Develop procedures for failure scenarios• Respond to unexpected off-nominal conditions

Page 85: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Mission Ops Level 2 Requirements

• Operate & maintain surface systems• Support crew operations for full mission• Ease of learning/similar subsystems• Create and maintain computer/video library• Encourage smart habitat/automation• Support programmatic activities• Support planning, long-term and real-time• Minimize dependence on Earth• Utilize auto fault detection and correction

Page 86: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Operations:

Mission Ops Specific

Item # Operation Description Duration Frequency Earth Control

Auto-mated

# of Crew

Mission Ops/Crew AccommodationsOPS 3.1 Publicity events – 1

st and last weeks of

mission

20 min to 1 hr

1x/day - - 2 to 6

OPS 3.2 Publicity events – other than 1st

and last weeks of mission

20 min to 1 hr

1x/week - - 2 to 6

OPS 3.3 Mission updates from Earth (A/V & text) 1 hr 1x/day X - 1

OPS 3.4 Mission updates from Mars (A/V & text) 1 hr 1x/day X - 1

OPS 3.5 Activity planning 2 hr 1x/week - - 1OPS 3.6 Food and drink consumption 0.5 hr 3x/day - - 6OPS 3.7 Socialization during meals 5 min 3x/day - - 6OPS 3.8 Recreation 2 hr 1x/day - - 6OPS 3.9 Clean-up following meals 10 min 3x/day - - 2OPS 3.10 Crew preparation at start of day 30 min 1x/day - - 6OPS 3.11 Straighten personal quarters 5 min 1x/day - - 6OPS 3.12 Break-time 15 min 2x/day - - 6OPS 3.13 Collect trash and deliver to waste

processing systems3 min 2x/week - - 6

OPS 3.14 General Housekeeping (vacuum, dust, bathroom etc.)

2 hr 1x/week - - 2

OPS 3.15 Optimization of integrated Hab systems to increase efficiency and function

4 hr 1x/mo X - 3

OPS 3.16 Daily Crew Briefing 10 min 1x/day - - 6OPS 3.17 Weekly Crew Briefing 1 hr 1x/week - - 6OPS 3.18 Pre-sleep 0.5 hr 1x/day - - 6OPS 3.19 Sleep 7.5 hr 1x/day - - 6OPS 3.20 Holiday time off 8 hr 1 day/mo - - 6OPS 3.21 Personal text and photo downlink secs/mins 2x/day - X -OPS 3.22 Personal text and photo uplink secs/mins 2x/day X X -OPS 3.23 Personal video downlink secs/mins 1x/week - X -OPS 3.24 Personal video uplink secs/mins 1x/week X X -OPS 3.25 Programmatic text and audio downlink secs/mins 3x/day - X -OPS 3.26 Programmatic text and audio uplink secs/mins 3x/day X X -OPS 3.27 Programmatic video downlink secs/mins 1x/week - X -OPS 3.28 Programmatic video uplink secs/mins 1x/week X X -

Page 87: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Operations:

Mission Ops Specific(continued)

Item # Operation Description Duration Frequency Earth Control

Auto-mated

# of Crew

OPS 3.29 All Habitat health telemetry downlink secs/mins every 3 hrs - X -OPS 3.30 Habitat health overview telemetry

downlinksecs/mins continuously - X -

OPS 3.31 Habitat emergency situation: all associated data (< ¼ of all hab data) downlinked

As needed continuously during

emergency

- X 2

OPS 3.32 Crew health data collection 5 min Daily, morning &

evening

- X 6

OPS 3.33 Crew health data ‘real time’ downlink 5 min Daily, morning &

evening

- X -

OPS 3.34 Crew health data collection during EVA 8 hr 1x/week, continuously

- - 2

OPS 3.35 Crew EVA health data ‘real time’ downlink

8 hr 1x/week, continuously

- X -

OPS 3.36 Crew exercise (includes prep & data collection)

1 hr (unless EVA)

1x/day, morning

- - 6

OPS 3.37 Crew exercise medical data ‘real time’ downlink

1 hr 1x/day, during exercise

- X -

OPS 3.38 Medical emergency situation: all related medical data downlinked

As needed continuously during

emergency

- X 2

OPS 3.39 Thorough medical check-up 45 min 1x/week - X 6OPS 3.40 Thorough medical check-up data

downlinksecs/mins 1x/week - X -

OPS 3.41 Science (analysis, reporting, etc…) 5 hr 1x/day (6 days of week)

- - 6

OPS 3.42 Science Video downlink mins 1x/week - X 2OPS 3.43 Science Data downlink (text data and

photos) mins 1x/day - X 2

OPS 3.44 Crew Accommodations equipment telemetry downlink (pressure, temperature, voltage, current, etc.)

secs/mins 1x/day - X -

OPS 3.45 Proficiency Training (med equip, photo equip...)

4 hr 1x/mo - X 6

Page 88: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Operations: MOB Subsystems

Page 89: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Mission OpsRepresentative Timelines

MONTH

Day 1 of Week Day 2 of Week Day 3 of Week Day 4 of Week Day 5 of Week Day 6 of Week Day 7 of Week

1

Science

2

EVA/Science

3

Science

4Tele Rover/Science

5

EVA/Science

6

Science

7

Off-Duty8

Science

9

EVA/Science

10

Science

11Tele Rover/Science

12

EVA/Science

13

Science

14

Off-Duty15

Science

16

EVA/Science

17

Holiday

18Tele Rover/Science

19

EVA/Science

20

Science

21

Off-Duty22

Science

23Press Rover/Science

24Press Rover/Science

25Press Rover/Science

26Press Rover/Science

27

Science

28

Off-Duty29Training DayEmerg Drills

30

Training Day

31

Science

Page 90: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Mission OpsRepresentative Daily Timelines

Proficiency Training Day 1

Crewmember 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 24:00 25:00 to 25:40 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00

CREW MC

CREW SIC

CREW MS1

CREW MS2

CREW MS3

CREW MS4

Proficiency Training Day 2

Crewmember 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 24:00 25:00 to 25:40 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00

CREW MC

CREW SIC

CREW MS1

CREW MS2

CREW MS3

CREW MS4

Wa

ke-U

p&

Exe

rcis

eW

ake

-Up

& E

xerc

ise

Wa

ke-U

p&

Exe

rcis

eP

rep

& c

ln q

trs

Bre

akf

ast

Bre

akf

ast

Bre

akf

ast

Pre

p &

cln

qtr

sP

rep

& c

ln q

trs

Ea

rth

mis

sio

n

up

da

te &

pla

n

SLEEP

SLEEP

SLEEP

Sle

ep

Sle

ep

Pre

-Sle

ep

Pre

-Sle

ep

Pre

-Sle

ep

Rec

reat

ion

Rec

reat

ion

Rec

reat

ion

ECLSSProficiency

Training Lu

nch

Mis

sio

n u

pd

ate

to

Ea

rth

Lu

nch

Din

ne

r P

rep

Din

ne

r &

cl

ea

n-u

pD

inn

er

Din

ne

r

Ha

b

Ma

inte

na

nce

Hab

Mai

nt.

Hab

Mai

nt.

Con

tinge

ncy

Ops

Con

tinge

ncy

Ops

ECLSSProficiency

Training

ECLSSProficiency

Training

ECLSSProficiency

Training

ECLSSProficiency

Training

ECLSSProficiency

TrainingM

ed

ica

l p

rofic

ien

cy

tra

inin

g

Me

dic

al

pro

ficie

ncy

tr

ain

ing

Me

dic

al

tra

inin

g

Wa

ke-U

p&

Exe

rcis

eW

ake

-Up

& E

xerc

ise

Wa

ke-U

p&

Exe

rcis

eP

rep

& c

ln q

trs

Bre

akf

ast

Bre

akf

ast

Bre

akf

ast

Pre

p &

cln

qtr

sP

rep

& c

ln q

trs

Ear

th m

issi

on

upda

te SLEEP

SLEEP

SLEEP

Sle

ep

Sle

ep

Pre

-Sle

ep

Pre

-Sle

ep

Pre

-Sle

ep

Rec

reat

ion

Rec

reat

ion

Rec

reat

ion

Mission OpsProficiency

Training Lu

nch

Mis

sio

n u

pd

ate

to

Ea

rth

Lu

nch

Din

ne

r P

rep

Din

ne

r &

cl

ea

n-u

pD

inn

er

Din

ne

r

Hab

Mai

nt.

Hab

Mai

nt.

Hab

Mai

nt.

cont

inge

ncy

ops

C3Proficiency

Training

C3Proficiency

Training

C3Proficiency

Training

C3

p

rofic

ien

cy

tra

inin

g

C3

p

rofic

ien

cy

tra

inin

g

C3

Pro

ficie

ncy

trai

ning

Mission OpsProficiency

Training

Mission OpsProficiency

Training

cont

inge

ncy

ops

cont

inge

ncy

ops

cont

inge

ncy

ops

cont

inge

ncy

ops

cont

inge

ncy

ops

cont

inge

ncy

ops

cont

inge

ncy

ops

fire/

emer

g dr

illsfir

e/em

erg

drills

fire/

emer

g dr

ills

Science/Hab Maintenance Day

Crewmember 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 24:00 25:00 to 25:40 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00

CREW MC

CREW SIC

CREW MS1

CREW MS2

CREW MS3

CREW MS4

Wa

ke-U

p&

Exe

rcis

eW

ake

-Up

& E

xerc

ise

Wa

ke-U

p&

Exe

rcis

eP

rep

& c

ln q

trs

Bre

akf

ast

Bre

akf

ast

Bre

akf

ast

Pre

p &

cln

qtr

sP

rep

& c

ln q

trs

Ea

rth

mis

sio

n

up

da

te &

pla

n

SLEEP

SLEEP

SLEEP

Sle

ep

Sle

ep

Pre

-Sle

ep

Pre

-Sle

ep

Pre

-Sle

ep

Rec

reat

ion

Rec

reat

ion

Rec

reat

ion

SCIENCE SCIENCE

Lu

nch

SCIENCE/Telerobotic

Rover

SCIENCE SCIENCE

Mis

sio

n u

pd

ate

to

Ea

rth

Lu

nch

Din

ne

r P

rep

Din

ne

r &

cl

ea

n-u

pD

inn

er

Din

ne

r

Ha

b

Ma

inte

na

nce

Ha

b

Ma

inte

na

nce

Hab

M

aint

enan

ce

Con

tinge

ncy

Ops

Con

tinge

ncy

Ops

Con

tinge

ncy

Ops

Con

tinge

ncy

Ops

Con

tinge

ncy

Ops

SCIENCE/Telerobotic

Rover

Page 91: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Crew Timeline Details

• Crew time requested by Subsystems for Hab maintenance

49.25 man-hrs/week + 56 man-hrs/mo = 62.18 man-hours/week (52 wks/12 mo)

• Time allocated in timelines for Hab maintenance 61 man-hrs/week

• Contingency Ops time allocated in timelines[ 6.75 man-hrs/std-day * 14 std-days/mo / (52 wks/12 mo) ] +[ 6.45 man-hrs/EVA day * 10 EVA days/mo / (52 wks/12 mo) ] +[ 2.25 man-hrs/pt-day * 2 pt-days/mo / (52 wks/12 mo) ]

= 37.8 man-hrs/week

Page 92: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

MO Verification of Requirements

Requirement Met? Notes

Operate & maintain surface systems YES

Support crew operations for full mission YES

Ease of learning/similar subsystems N/A Not at this level of design

Computer/video library YES

Smart habitat/automation SOME Automation subsystem

Programmatic activities YES

Planning, long-term and real-time YES

Minimize dependence on Earth SOME Little detail at this level

Auto fault detection and correction YES C3 subsystem + FMEA

Page 93: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Mission Ops Future Considerations

• Alternate Implementations– Increase Automation– Distribute Proficiency Training throughout each month

• Develop Documentation– Proficiency Training Tools– Operational Procedures– System Manuals/Tutorials – Troubleshooting Library– Malfunction Procedures– Flight Data File Templates

• Training– Crew– Earth support team

• Continue Iterations

Page 94: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

CREW ACCOMMODATIONS

(CA)

Page 95: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

CA Level 2 Requirements

• Maintain appropriate levels of hygiene cleanliness

• Maintain appropriate levels of Hab cleanliness

• Provide crewmember psychological support

• Maintain crew physical health through exercise & monitoring

• Perform routine and emergency medical services

• Habitat must encourage efficient, comfortable crew operations

Page 96: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

CA Level 2 Requirements

• Schedule must accommodate crew physical & psychological health ops

– eating, sleeping, recreation, e-mail, exercise, housekeeping, hygiene, vacation time, and medical procedures

• Crew clothing must be refreshed regularly

• Cleansing of entire crewmember body

• Housekeeping provisions

• Exercise equipment to maintain physical health

• Medical diagnostic and surgical tools

• Provide equipment for recreation

• Personal space for sleep & stowage

• Workstation designs must consider human reach profiles

• Adequate lighting for the crew members

Page 97: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

CA Interfaces with MOB Subsystems

Page 98: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Crew Accommodations Equipment(1 of 2)

• Galley and Food System– Kitchen cleaning supplies– Dishwasher– Cooking/eating supplies

• Waste Collection System– WCS supplies (toilet paper, sanitary napkins, etc... )– Contingency fecal and urine collection bags

• Personal Hygiene– Shower– Hand wash/mouthwash faucet– Personal Hygiene kits– Hygiene supplies

• Clothing– Clothing– Washing Machine– Clothes Dryer

• Recreational Equipment and Personal Stowage– Personal stowage/closet space– DVD player and DVDs

Page 99: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Crew Accommodations Equipment(2 of 2)

• Housekeeping– Vacuum (prime + 2 spares)– Disposable Wipes– Trash bags

• Operational Supplies & Restraints– Supplies (diskettes, Velcro, Ziplocs, tape)– Restraints and Mobility aids

• Maintenance: All repairs in habitable areas– Hand tools and accessories– Test equipment (oscilloscopes, gauges, etc…)– Fixtures, large machine tools, glove boxes, etc…

• Photography (All Digital)– Equipment (still and video cameras, lenses, memory, etc)

• Sleep Accommodations– Personal quarters with sleep accommodations– Stowage space for personal equipment– Sleep restraints

• Crew Health Care– Exercise Equipment– Medical/Surgical/Dental suite– Medical/Surgical/Dental consumables

Page 100: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

CrewAccommodations

Active Equipment

Page 101: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

CA Trade Study

• Clothes Refresh Options:– Bring enough clean clothes for mission– Hand wash clothes– Washer

• Trade-offs:

• Decision: Washing Machine

Bring all Clothes/Linens Hand Wash Clothes/Linens Washing MachinePros/Cons Pros/Cons Pros/Cons

Pro: No cleaning Ops Con: Ops Demanding - 10 man-hrs/mo Pro: Minimal Ops - 1 man-hrs/moCon: Large Clothing Mass - 2210 kg Pro: Lower Clothing Mass - 594 kg Pro: Lower Clothing Mass - 594 kgPro: Least complex Pro: Minimal complexity Con: Most complexPro: No additional equipment Pro: No additional equipment Con: Washer equip - 100 kgEqual: soap Equal: soap Equal: soapPro: no water needed Con: Water loss - 960 kg Con: Water loss - 910 kg

Total Mass: 2250 kg Total Mass: 1554 kg Total Mass: 1604 kgWashing Ops: 0 hrs Washing Ops: 12 hrs Washing Ops: 1 hr

Page 102: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Crew Accommodations

Mass, Power, and Volume

Estimates

Crew Accommodations

#

Weight (kg)

Total Weight

(kg)

Total Power (kW)

Volume (m3)

Total Volume

(m3)

Galley and Food System

Kitchen cleaning supplies (per day) 600 0.25 150.00 0.0018 1.08

Dishwasher 1 40 40.00 1.20 0.5600 0.56

Cooking/eating supplies (per person) 6 5 30.00 0.0140 0.08

Waste Collection System

WCS supplies (toilet paper, etc... ~ per person per day) 3600 0.05 180.00 0.0013 4.68

Contingency fecal and urine collection bags (per person) 6 3 18.00 0.0120 0.07

Personal Hygiene

Shower 1 75 75.00 1.00 1.4100 1.41

Handwash/mouthwash faucet 1 8 8.00 0.0100 0.01

Personal Hygiene kit (1 per person) 6 1.8 10.80 0.0050 0.03

Hygiene supplies (per person per day) 3600 0.075 270.00 0.0015 5.40

Clothing

Clothing (per person) 6 99 594.00 0.3360 2.02

Washing Machine 1 100 100.00 1.50 0.7500 0.75

Clothes Dryer 1 60 60.00 2.50 0.7500 0.75

Recreational Equipment and Personal Stowage

Personal stowage/closet space (per person) 6 50 300.00 0.70 0.7500 4.50

DVD player and DVDs (per person) 6 2 12.00 0.40 0.0010 0.0060

Housekeeping

Vacuum (prime + 2 spares) 3 4.333 13.00 0.40 0.0233 0.0700

Disposable Wipes (per person per day) 3600 0.05 180.00 0.0015 5.4000

Trash bags (per person per day) 3600 0.03 108.00 0.0010 3.6000

Operational Supplies & Restraints

Supplies(diskettes, velcro, ziplocks, tape ~ per person) 6 20.00 120.00 0.0200 0.1200

Restraints and Mobility aids 1 100.00 100.00 0.5400 0.5400

Maintenance: All repairs in habitable areas

Hand tools and accessories 1 300.00 300.00 1.00 1.0000

Test equipment (oscilloscopes, gauges, etc…) 1 500.00 500.00 1.00 1.50 1.5000

Fixtures, large machine tools, gloveboxes, etc… 1 1000.00 1000.00 1.00 5.00 5.0000

Photography (All Digital)

Equipment (still and video cameras, lenses, memory, etc) 1 120.00 120.00 0.40 0.50 0.5000

Sleep Accommodations

Personal quarters with sleep accommodations (per person) 6 1.5 9

Stowage space for personal equipment (per person) 6 0.63 3.78

Sleep restraints (per person) 6 9.00 54.00 0.10 0.6000

Crew Health Care

Exercise Equipment 1 145.00 145.00 0.15 0.19 0.1900

Medical/Surgical/Dental suite 1 1000.00 1000.00 1.50 4.00 4.0000

Medical/Surgical/Dental consumables 1 500.00 500.00 2.50 2.5000

Totals 5987.799 11.75 59.15

• Total Mass: 5,988 kg• Total Power: 11.75 kW• Total Min. Volume: 60 m3

Page 103: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

CA Verification of RequirementsBrief Description of Requirement Verified

Crew Accommodations Scheduling to support Crew physicallyand psychologically: eating, sleeping, recreation, e-mail, exercise, housekeeping, hygiene, vacation time, public affairs, and medical procedures

yes - Mission Ops

Crew Clothing: Supply Refresh

yesyes - washer & dryer

Cleansing of Crewmember Body: Body Cleansing Nails, Teeth, Hair, etc…

yes - shower, faucetyes - hygiene kit

Housekeeping yes - vacuum, wipes, trash bagsExercise equipment to maintain physical health yes - exact hardware needs to be

selected/designedMedical Support: Routine medical exams Passive crew health sensors Diagnostic and surgical equipment Training and procedures Troubleshooting (Crew & Earth)

yes - Mission Opssome - needs better definitionyes - exact hardware to be selectedyes - Mission Opsyes - Mission Ops

Provide equipment for recreation some - DVD player, laptop, cameras

Personal space for sleep & stowage: Provisions for sleep and stowage Control environment through light, temp, sound, odor

yes - beds, restraints, storage, deskssome - needs better definition

Workstation designs: Comfortable and consider human reach profiles no - haven't reached that level

of design

Adequate lighting for crew members some - mass estimate not included

Page 104: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

CA Future Considerations

• Equipment Design and Operation in Mars Gravity– Washing Machine– Clothes Dryer– Shower– Dishwasher

• Continue incorporation of human factors considerations into subsystem designs

• Incorporate CA FMEA into Hab Design– Improve Redundancy– Modify Hardware Designs

Page 105: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Command, Communications, and Control (C3) Subsystem Team

• Primary:– Heather Howard– Keric Hill

• Support:– Tom White

Page 106: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

C3 Subsystem Summary

• C3 supports and manages data flows required to achieve mission objectives and maintain habitat and crew health and safety

• Design based on qualitative data flows and level 2 requirements derived from the DRM

• C3 architecture, mass, power and volume are addressed by our subsystem design

Page 107: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

C3 Level 2 Requirements

• Support checkout of surface infrastructure pre-crew arrival.

• Include a computer-based library.• Support a "smart" automated habitat.• Support audio/visual caution and warning alarms.• Support Earth-based control and monitoring for the

habitat’s subsystems.• Provide communication with crewmembers working

outside the habitat and rovers.• Mass must not exceed 320 kg.

Page 108: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

ISRU ISRU PlantPlant

Nuclear Nuclear ReactorReactor

Mars Mars Env’mtEnv’mt

EVASEVAS

ISRUISRU

PowerPower ECLSSECLSS

ThermalThermal

CCCCCC

Robotics & Robotics & AutomationAutomation StructureStructure

CrewCrew

Crew Crew AccommodationsAccommodations

LegendENERGY

Packetized DataTelemetry/DataCommand/Data

VoiceVideo

Electrical powerHeat

Earth

MarsComSatC3 I/O

Diagram

Page 109: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

C3 Design Overview

• Command and control subsystem• Based on ISS C3 subsystem• Habitat interface: 3 tiered architecture connected by

Mil-Std-1553B data bus• User interface: personal workstations, file server,

caution and warning subsystem

• External communications subsystem• Based on ISS, shuttle and Mars probes• High gain communications via Mars orbiting satellite• Local area UHF communications

Page 110: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Tier 2 Science

Computers (2)

Tier 2 Subsystem

Computers (4)

Tier 1 Command

Computers (3)

Tier 3Subsystem

Computers (8)

FirmwareControllers

Sensors

Caution &Warning (4)

UserTerminals (6)

FileServer (1)

Tier 1 Emergency

Computer (1)

LegendEthernetRF ConnectionMil-Std 1553B BusTBD

CommSystem

Experiments

RF Hubs (3)

C3 System

Other Systems

Command and Control Architecture

Page 111: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Communications Subsystem Architecture

1 meter diameter high gain (36 dB) antenna

Backup1 meter diameter high gain antenna

Medium gain (10 dB) antenna

Amplifier

1st Backup

2nd Backup

Control Unit

1st Backup

2nd Backup

Data from CCC

2nd Backup

1st Backup

EVA UHF

Page 112: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Communication Data Rates

Telemetry downlinkedPower

(W)Data rate

(kbps)Required Availability

High gain to Mars Sat 20 10000 0.12%

High gain direct to Earth 124 50 23.12%

Medium gain to Mars Sat 70 500 2.31%

Telemetry generatedNumber of

Sensors/MessagesTime averaged data

rate (kbps)

ECLSS 238 0.069

Power 200 0.067

Thermal 105 0.350

Structures 60 0.002

ISRU 96 0.005

Mission Ops 69 11.065

Totals 768 11.558

Page 113: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

C3 Power

Component

Number Operating Occupied

Number Operating

Unoccupied

Unit Power

(W)

Occupied Power

(W)Unoccupied Power (W)

Tier 1 Com. Comp. 3 3 60.0 180.00 180.00Tier 1 Emer. Comp. 1 1 60.0 60.00 60.00Tier 2 Sci. Comp. 2 2 60.0 120.00 120.00Tier 2 Sub. Comp. 4 4 60.0 240.00 240.00Tier 3 Sub. Comp. 8 8 60.0 480.00 480.00RF Hubs 3 0 12.5 37.50 0.00C&W Panels 4 0 5.0 20.00 0.00User Terminals 6 0 60.0 360.00 0.00File Server 1 1 60.0 60.00 60.00Safety Factor NA NA NA 311.50 228.00High Gain Com. NA NA NA 20.00 20.00UHF Com. NA NA NA 20.00 20.00

Totals 1909.00 1408.00

Page 114: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

C3 Volume and Mass

Component

In-Line Units

Spare Units

Total Units

Unit Mass (kg)

Total Mass (kg)

Unit Volume (m^3)

Total Volume (m^3)

Tier 1 Com. Comp. 3 3.1 6.1 3.05 18.54 0.00316 0.0192Tier 1 Emer. Comp. 1 1.0 2.0 3.05 6.18 0.00316 0.0064Tier 2 Sci. Comp. 2 2.1 4.1 3.05 12.36 0.00316 0.0128Tier 2 Sub. Comp. 4 4.1 8.1 3.05 24.72 0.00316 0.0256Tier 3 Sub. Comp. 8 8.2 16.2 3.05 49.45 0.00316 0.0513RF Hubs 3 9.2 12.2 0.34 4.16 0.00118 0.0144C&W Panels 4 8.0 12.0 0.10 1.20 0.00068 0.0081User Terminals 6 6.2 12.2 3.05 37.08 0.00316 0.0384File Server 1 1.0 2.0 3.05 6.18 0.00316 0.0064Extended Life Batteries 0 1.9 1.9 0.37 0.70 0.00039 0.0007Ethernet Cable 1300 13.0 1313.0 0.03 39.39 0.00002 0.0258Coaxial Cable 2300 23.0 2323.0 0.03 69.69 0.00002 0.0456Minor Components NA NA NA NA 26.97 NA 0.0255Safety Factor NA NA NA NA 59.33 NA 0.0561Communications NA NA NA NA 146.00 NA NA

Totals 501.96 0.3363

Page 115: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

C3 Requirements Verification

• Must support checkout of surface infrastructure.– C3 will monitor the habitat during all mission phases.

• Must include a computer-based library.– Computer-based library is housed on the file server.

• Must support a "smart" automated habitat.– C3 interfaces with all subsystems to support automation.

• Must support audio/visual caution and warning alarms.– C3 includes an audio/visual caution and warning subsystem.

• Must support Earth-based control and monitoring.– The high gain com subsystem facilitates Earth-based monitoring and

control.• Must provide communication with EVA crew and rovers.

– The high gain and UHF communication subsystems support external com.

• Mass must not exceed 320 kg.– Mass is estimated at 502 kg.

Page 116: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Future Considerations

• Modular nature of C3 subsystem should make future subsystem capacity adjustments straightforward

• Next iteration will better define quantitative data flows and resize the subsystem accordingly

• Current design exceeds allocated mass

Page 117: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Automation and Robotic Interfaces Subsystem Team

• Primary – Eric DeKruif

• Support – Eric Schliecher– Dax Matthews

Page 118: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Automation and Robotic Interfaces Level 2 Requirements

• Provide for local transportation• Deploy scientific instruments• Deploy and operate various mechanisms on

habitat• Automate time consuming and monotonous

activities

Page 119: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Robotics and Automation

• Number/Functions of rovers– Three classes of rovers, each have power

requirements driven by their range and the systems they must support

• Minimum of two small rovers for scientific exploration• One medium rover for local transportation• Two large pressurized rovers for long exploration and

infrastructure inspection

• Automation of structural components, maintenance, and site preparation

Page 120: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Input Output Diagram

Page 121: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Small Scientific Rover

• Responsibilities – Deploy scientific instruments for analysis

and monitoring of Mars– Determine safe routes for crew travel– Collect and return samples– Scientific exploration of Mars– Support teleoperations from shirt sleeve

environment– Explore distances up to 1000’s of km

Page 122: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Small Scientific Rover

• Scientific rover will be fully autonomous and self recharging - will require minimal direct interface with the habitat

• Power– 0.7 kW max power requirement

• Includes safety factor of 25%• Estimate based on data from Mars Exploration Rover• Solar arrays needed for power/recharging of batteries

• Mass– 440 kg

Page 123: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Local Unpressurized Rover

• Responsibilities– Transport EVA crew up to 100 km– Operate continuously for up to 10 hours– Transport all EVA tools– Allow crew operation for local exploration

Page 124: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Local Unpressurized Rover

• Power– 2.5 kW power requirement

• Safety factor of 25%• 12.5 hours charge time using 2 kW allocated power• Lithium ion battery

• Mass– Battery mass 250 kg

• For Li-ion batteries 10 kg/(kW*h)

– Total mass 4400 kg

Page 125: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Large Pressurized Rover

• Responsibilities, split between EVA and Robotics– Deploy and inspect infrastructure

• Power station, antennas, solar arrays, etc.

– Nominal crew of two with maximum capacity of four

– Support 16 crew-hours of EVA per day– Will operate 2 mechanical arms from telerobotic

workstation or preprogrammed with earth observers

– Ten day max exploration time– 500 km range

Page 126: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Large Pressurized Rover

• Power– 10 kW power output

• Specified in DRM

– Power provided by trailer through a dynamic isotope system

– Power includes all life support systems as well as movement and mechanical arm operation

• Mass– Mass 14000 kg

• Specified in DRM

Page 127: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Automated Items

• Automated doors in case of depressurization• Deployment of habitat• Connection to power plant• Inspection of habitat infrastructure• Site preparation• Deployment of communications hardware• External monitoring equipment• Deployment of radiator panels

Page 128: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Automated Items

• Deployment/Movement of scientific equipment• Leveling of habitat• Processing of consumable waste• Connect ISRU to habitat• ISRU/Power plant inspection• Assumptions

Page 129: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Automation Solutions

• Leveling of habitat– 12 linear actuators

• 720 mm of travel• Mass – 60 kg each• Power - 35 watts each

• Deployment of Radiator panels– 8 linear actuators

• Mass – 9 kg each• Power – 5 watts each

Page 130: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Interface Requirements Verification

Medium rover must be recharged

Charged via external male/female cable

Medium rover charge discharge cycle must be less than one day

Using 2 kW rover can be recharged in 12.5 hours and run down in 10 hours

Large rover must directly mate with habitat

Habitat hatch mates directly to large rover

Rovers must deploy and inspect habitat

Large rover will reorient and inspect habitat using arms

Rovers must be capable of moving habitat

Large rover will have towing capabilities

Page 131: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Requirements Verification

Rovers must provide for local transportation

Medium unpressurized rechargeable rover can travel up to 100 km over 10 hrs

Rovers must deploy scientific instruments

Small rovers will be capable of deploying instruments

Must deploy and operate various mechanisms on habitat

Motors and actuators will allow for deployment/movement

Time consuming and monotonous activities need to be automated

Mechanical devices, such as motors and valves, will be implemented for these activities

Page 132: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Future Considerations

• More complete design specifications of rovers will allow for more complete interface designs. (i.e. large rover)

• Better definition of what data is being transferred and the quantity of data

• Specifications and definitions on automated tasks will allow hardware selection

Page 133: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Extravehicular Activity Systems (EVAS) Interfaces Team

• Primary – Dax Matthews– Bronson Duenas

• Support – Teresa Ellis

Page 134: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Extra-Vehicular Activity Systems

• EVAS is primarily responsible for providing the ability for individual crew members to move around and conduct useful tasks outside the pressurized habitat

• EVAS tasks will consist of constructing and maintaining the habitat, and scientific investigation

• EVAS broken up into 3 systems– EVA suit– Airlock– Pressurized Rover

Page 135: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

EVAS I/O Diagram

Page 136: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

EVAS – EVA Suit

• Critical functional elements– pressure shell– atmospheric and thermal control– communications – monitor and display– nourishment– hygiene

• Current suit is too heavy and cumbersome to explore the Martian environment

• ILC Dover is currently developing the I-Suit which is lighter, packable into a smaller volume, and has better mobility and dexterity

Page 137: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

EVAS – EVA Suit

• I-Suit specs:– Soft upper-torso– 4.3 lbs/in2 (suit pressure can be varied)– ~29.48 kg– Easier to tailor to each individual astronaut– Bearings at important rotational points– Greater visibility– Boots with tread for walking on Martian terrain– Parts are easily interchangeable (decreases

number of spare parts needed)

Page 138: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

EVAS - Airlock

• Independent element capable of being relocated as mission requires

• Three airlocks each containing three EVA suits

• Airlock will be a solid shell (not inflatable)• The airlock will interface with the habitat

through both an umbilical system and the hatch

Page 139: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

EVAS - Airlock

• Airlock sized for three crew members with facilities for EVA suit maintenance and consumables servicing

• Down-selected to 2 airlock designs– Design 1

• Total Volume: 35 m^3 (4L x 3.5W x 2.5H)

• Advantages: easier don/doff, more storage, bigger workstation, more room for rover hatch

• Disadvantages: Volume displaced during transit, extra mass

– Design 2• Total Volume: 27.95 m^3 (2.6L x 4.3W x 2.5H)

• Advantages: Less volume displaced during transit, less massive

• Disadvantages: Less work area, much harder to get to emergency suit, possibly not enough room for rover hatch

– Decision will be made by structures based on optimal layout

• Mass TBD

Page 140: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

EVAS – Umbilical System

• Connections from the habitat to the airlock and rover will be identical systems (including male/female connections)

• Inputs from habitat to airlock/rover (through umbilical system)– Water potable

• To EVA suit ‘ankle pack’ – 0.53 to 1.16 kg per person per EVA

– Water non-potable• To EVA suit Portable Life Support System (PLSS) - 5.5 kg per person per EVA

– Oxygen• To EVA suit PLSS – 0.63 kg person per EVA• To airlock – TBD (depends on sizing of airlock)

– Nitrogen• To airlock – TBD (sizing of airlock)

– Data• To airlock pump system

– Power• To EVA suit PLSS – 26 Ahr @ 16.8 V dc• To airlock pump system – 4.5 kw for 8 minutes per pump (# TBD)• To airlock electronics (lights, readouts, etc.)

Page 141: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

EVAS – Umbilical System

• Outputs from airlock/rover to habitat (through umbilical system)– Waste water

• Urine – 0.5 kg per day per astronaut

– Air• From airlock to storage tank – airlock volume minus 10% (TBD)

– Data• Telemetry from rover and EVA suit• Airlock total pressure and partial pressure of oxygen• Hatch status (sealed/open)• EVA suit and rover consumables (power level, O2, total P, water)

• Other consumables and outputs– Lithium Hydroxide canisters– Waste collection of garment/fecal waste– Dust filters– Temperature and humidity control (required for repress and contingency)

Page 142: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

EVAS – Pressurized Rover

• Nominal crew of 2 – can carry 4 in emergency situations

• Rover airlock capable of surface access and direct connection to habitat

• Per day, rover can support 16 crew hours of EVA• Work station – can operate 2 mechanical arms from

shirt sleeve environment • Facilities for recharging portable LSS and minor

repairs to EVA suit• The rover will interface with the habitat through both

an umbilical system and the hatch

Page 143: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Future Considerations

• Suit – Finalize suit design for Martian

environment

• Airlock– Decision on design and calculation of mass– Design of pump system

• Operational protocols

Page 144: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Habitat Design Summary

• Mass 59,754 kg - Exceeds DRM recommendation by 25,754 kg- Exceeds max allowable by 9,754 kg

• Overall Volume 615 m3

- Meets DRM max allowable

• Subsystem Volume 294 m3

- 321 m3 of open space in habitat

• Maximum Power 26.25 kW

- Exceeds DRM recommendation by 1.25 kW- Overall Martian base power = 160 kW

Subsystem

Total Mass (kg)

Total Power (kW)

Total Volume

(m3)

ISRU 325.00 0.50 0.65Structures 15788.60 N/A 149.25PowerECLSS 31248.46 9.56 83.48Thermal Control 4995.82 2.00 13.72Mission Ops/Crew Accomm 5987.80 11.75 46.37C3 532.36 1.90 0.33Robotics/Automation 876.00 0.53 0.60EVAs

Page 145: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Conclusions

• Summarized and derived governing requirements and constraints from DRM

• Emphasized requirements identification and documentation

• Established first iteration design that incorporated functional subsystem definition and analysis of integration factors:

- i.e. structural layout, mass flows, power distribution, data transmission

• Emphasis on human factors:- Crew Accommodations and Mission

Operations - crew health and well-being

Page 146: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Conclusions (continued)

• Incorporated generic human spacecraft design requirements from Man-Systems Integration Standards (NASA STD-3000 Rev. B, 1995) – as applicable

• Assessed compatibility of floor plan options proposed in various existing architectural habitat concepts

• Unique merger of systems engineering, architecture, and human factors

Page 147: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Suggestions for Future Work

• Optimize each subsystem design to reduce mass and power requirements

- redundancy vs. contingency (from FMEA’s)

- trade studies• Detailed architectural layout of all subsystem technologies

into habitat• Further iteration• Requirements re-evaluation• Derive Level 3 and Level 4 requirements and design

solutions• More detailed/organized Interface Control Documents

between subsystems

Page 148: Mars or Bust Preliminary Design Review

Report Available

December 17, 2003

http://www.colorado.edu/ASEN/project/mob