martin l. perl stanford linear accelerator center kavli institute for particle astrophysics and...
DESCRIPTION
Searches for Fractionally Charged Particles: What Should Be Done Next ?. Martin L. Perl Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology Talk presented at TAU08 Workshop September, 2008. ABSTRACT - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Martin L. Perl
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
Talk presented at TAU08 WorkshopSeptember, 2008
Searches forFractionally Charged Particles:What Should Be Done Next ?
2
ABSTRACT
Since the initial measurements of the electron charge a century ago, experimenters have faced the persistent question as to whether elementary particles exist that have charges that are fractional multiples of the electron charge.
I review the results of the last 50 years of searching for fractional charge particles with no confirmed positive results.
I discuss the question of whether while more searching can be done, is it worthwhile?
3
THE PUZZLE OF UNIT ELECTRIC CHARGE
We have no explanation why the electric charges of all the known elementary particles are either zero or q or ± q/3 or±2q/3 or ±q where q is the magnitude of the electron’s charge, 1.6 x 10-19coulombs. We call q the unit electric charge.
There are no confirmed observations of elementary or composite particles with charge Q=rq where r is a fraction such as 2/7 or an irrational or transcendental number. We call these hypothetical particles, fractional electric charge particles, even though the fraction Q/q might be greater than 1, for example a particle with charge Qq. We use F to mean a fractional electric charge particle.
´´
4
Particle (units of q) Charge
Charged leptons: e, ±1
Neutrinos 0
Quarks: u, c, t ±2/3
Quark: d, s, b ±1/3
Photon 0
Z0 0
W ±1
Graviton ? 0?
Dark matter particle ? 0?
5
A Bit of History
• About 1910 Robert Millikan and Harvey Fletcher elucidated the magnitude of the electron charge q. And by the early 1920s there was consensus that q was the smallest electric charge.
• This was not challenged until the 1960s when physicists adopted the view of quarks as real elementary particles. This view of quarks and the increasing use of particle accelerators led to many searches for particles with charge q/3 or 2q/3 q or higher fractions such as 4/3q.
6
Quarks and Free Quark Searches
•Searches for fractional charge particles beginning in the 1960s emphasized searching for free quarks.
•The incentive was the possibility that once in a while isolated quarks might break free in a high-energy interaction. This possibility has not been realized, and the absence of free quarks has become enshrined in the theory of quark confinement inside quantum chromodynamics
•The acceptance of quark confinement has led searchers for fractional charge particles to look more broadly for fractional charge particles with any charge.
7
Search interest is in free = isolatedelementary particles withfractional electric charge.
Examples:1/3 q
q
-1.5 q
.45 q
1.0001 q
8
Search Methods
1. Searches using particle accelerators and fixed targets.
2. Searches using particle colliders.
3 Searches in cosmic rays.
4 Searches in bulk matter.
5 Special search methods for particles with Q very close to 0. called millicharged or minicharged particles.
9
Remarks on Fractional Charge Particles searches
•We do not know how fractional charge particles interact with ordinary particles; is the interaction strong or electromagnetic or weak or a not yet discovered force?
•Since we do not know the F mass, mF, searches using accelerators, colliders, or cosmic rays are broader as the energy increases. On the other hand, sensitivity of searches in bulk matter are independent of mF.
10
More Remarks on Fractional Charge Particles searches
•All past and present searches are limited to particles, that are or can be isolated at the elementary particle level from their antiparticles or other related particles.
•General collider detectors cannot be used to find particles with Q/q <1/3 because track reconstruction is uncertain.
11
SEARCHES USING PARTICLE ACCELERATORS AND FIXED TARGETS
proton or antiproton + nucleon F+Q + X
e + nucleon F+Q + X
+ nucleon F+Q + X
+ nucleon F+Q + X
where X = F-Q + other known particles
All searches null.
12
Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions
Possibility that fractional charge particles could be produced in high-energy nucleus-nucleus collisions where quark confinement might not hold perfectly.
All searches null. No definitive data from RHIC.
13
Search in Electron-Positron Colliders
e+ + e- F+Q + F-Q
233s
e+ + e- Z0 F+Q + F-Q
(From Opal & ALEPH)
Etotal (GeV) Charges sought (q units)
130—209 2/3, 4/3, 5/3
130--136, 161, 172 2/3
Z0 2/3, 4/3
Z0 4/3
All searches null.
14
Searches in Proton-Antiproton Colliders
(From D0 & CDF)
Etotal (TeV) Charges sought (q units)
1.8 2/3, 4/3
1.8 & 2/3
All searches null.
Searches in Proton-Proton Colliders
Wait for L H C
15
SEARCHES FOR FRACTIONAL CHARGE PARTICLES COMING FROM OUTSIDE THE EARTH
Possible sources:
(a) The particles may have been produced in the early universe and be a stable component of the present material in the universe.
(b) The particles may be produced in the present era in violent astrophysical processes .
(c) The particles may be produced in the interaction of ordinary cosmic rays with the Earth’s atmosphere .
Search sensitivity is given in terms of the incoming flux with units of cm-2sr-1s-1
16
.17 .20 .25 .33 .50 1.0
Q/q
17
SEARCHES FOR FRACTIONAL CHARGE PARTICLES IN BULK MATTER
1. Levitometer method
2. Millikan liquid drop method
18
From Early Universeto Solar System
space
solar system
early universe
star
ff f
f
ff f
f
fXf fY
19
Searches have been carried out in the following materials:
sea water
silicone oil
mercury
iron
niobium
meteorites
Many of these materials were chosen for ease of use in the search technology.
20
Levitometer MethodSmith-Jones Group, EnglandMorpurgo Group, ItalyLaRue-Fairbank Group, USA
21
QE=Electric Force = 6rVterm
viscosityof air
terminalvelocity
radiusof drop
The Millikan Liquid DropMethod Using Stokes LawS. F. State Group, USASLAC Group, USA
electricfield
chargeon drop
QE
22
The Millikan Liquid DropMethod Using Stokes Law
23
Method Material Sample(mg) Nucleons
ferromagnetic lev. steel 3.7 2.4x1021
ferromagnetic lev. tungsten 3.0 1.4x1021
ferromagnetic lev. niobium 6.5 4.2x1021
ferromagnetic lev. meteorite 2.8 1.8x1021
superconducting lev. niobium 1.1 7x l020
liquid drop mercury 2.0 1.3x1021
liquid drop silicone oil 259 1.7x1023
liquid drop meteorite 3.9 2.5x1021
Searches in Bulk Material
All null except superconductinglevitometer using niobium, but…
24
Searches for Millicharged Particles
•Q/q < 0.1
•Q/q as small as 10-15
25
Only ExperimentalMillicharged Particle Search
Prinz-Jaros (SLAC)PRL 81, 1175 (1998)
26
Summary of millicharged particle searchesDavidson et al. JHEP05 (2000) 003
Q/qRG: decay in red giantsWD: decay in white dwarfsBBN: nucleosynthesis
27
Summary
Since no evidence for fractional charge particles
1. Extend the millicharged particle search of Prinz-Jaros to higher energies and larger statistics
2. Search for fractional charged particles at he Large Hadron Collider. Not easy because most events have large multiplicity.
3. Perhaps extend searches in bulk matter using the ferromagnetic levitometer method ?? (Meteoritic material from asteroids is most appropriate for future examination.)