mason instrument inc
DESCRIPTION
Mason Instrument IncTRANSCRIPT
Mason Instrument IncCase Analysis
BBM, NMP Term III
Group 4Argha Ray - 15 Chakra Dhar Kundu - 22 Khushal Malik - 28 Sanjay Kumar Prasad – 45
Context• Mason is a large Military equipment contractor.
• Has won two competitive bidding rounds for Avionics in Cherokee Missiles.
• Estimated $3 billion in spending lined up by US Navy for next five years on Cherokee Avionics.
• Eldridge is competitor in chief.
• Mason does not have foothold in Guided Missile market.
Naval Command’s Strategy:• Develop second source of supply for Cherokee avionics.
• Reduce cost of procurement.
• Firm Fixed Price policy.
• No progress payments.
• Prove Out Blueprints.
• Collaborative and flexible supplier who can accommodate frequent design changes.
Mason’s Response:• No profit margin in initial bid.
• Value Engineering to reduce cost.
• Division of tooling cost between government and the company.
• Competitive sourcing by Purchasing agents.
• Lowered overhead rates.
• Relationship building with contracting officer.
• However, facing problems in assembling and testing of product. Costs spiraling out of control due to inadequate Blueprint and inferior Seeker supply.
• New Naval contracting officer may not be favorable.
Eldridge’s Existential Crisis:• Weak financial position.
• Ramp down of Cherokee project.
• Personnel in Cherokee project have joined Mason.
• Non cooperation in Blueprinting shows that they are afraid and gradually losing ground.
• New project manager with authority to set prices.
• Difficult to sustain the Cherokee project.
• Pricing of only $450 above Mason in 67% of 2nd round contract and 25% higher above Mason in 33% of contract shows desperation to get 67% of contract.
• Don’t have much leeway to reduce price below $1.35 lakh. Pricing in 67% of 2nd round contract shows the maximum price hit they can take.
Yardsticks:• Eldridge may go out of Cherokee business if it is not able to crack the upcoming bid.
• Difficult for them to price too low as financial position is weak.
• Cherokee project personnel have been dismissed en masse, so it will be difficult to sustain large production quantity.
• Eldridge likely to eye smaller production quantity of around 1000 units with stable profit margins.
• Mason has to cut teeth in Cherokee to get future Guided Missile business.
• Eldridge has production experience of 1000 units and new order of another 1000 only.
• Mason has delivered 50 units till now and has new orders of 2000 units. Mason expected to be larger player in short span of time.
• Initial training and familiarization investment has already been done and gradually cost will come down for Mason as it gains experience in making the 2000 units it has now won.
• Mason has estimated $1.4 lakh/unit for 2000 units and should be able to cut corners for next 3000.
Pricing Formula:
• Bid prices computed using winning formula of 2nd round bidding.• Dominant strategy is to price low.• Profit should be secondary consideration to Market penetration.• Eldridge’s price in 33% of 2nd round 150059*1.25=187570 (approx. 1.8 in
Game Table) and little above Mason in 67% of contract (approx. 1.36 in Game Table)
Units 2.5% incremental decrease in unit cost$250 177132500 172811750 168597
1000 1644841250 1604731500 1565591750 1527402000 1490152250 1453802500 1418342750 1383753000 135000
Price in 100KMason's Options 1.8 1.36
1.6 Wins Loses1.35 Wins Wins
Eldrige's Options
Decision:• Price at $1.35 lakh to get entire 3000 unit contract.
• Concentrate on value engineering to reduce cost.
• Bulk of training cost has already been incurred so it is going to come down gradually.
• Offer to redraw Blueprints such that Naval Command do not remain captive customer of Eldridge in future.
• Concentrate on Market Penetration than on margin as window of opportunity against a jittery Eldridge is mouth watering.