massachusetts institute of technology - van...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Supplementary Information
A versatile genome-scale PCR-based pipeline for high-definition DNA FISH
Magda Bienko1–3,7, Nicola Crosetto1–3,7, Leonid Teytelman1–3, Sandy Klemm4, Shalev Itzkovitz1–3 & Alexander van Oudenaarden1–3,5,6
1Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. 2Department
of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. 3Koch Institute for
Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. 4Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. 5Hubrecht Institute–KNAW (Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and
Sciences). 6University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 7These authors contributed equally to
this work. Correspondence should be addressed to A.v.O. ([email protected]).
Nature Methods: doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2306
2
Supplementary Item Title or Caption
Supplementary Figure 1 Distribution of HD-FISH amplicons along the human and
mouse genomes
Supplementary Figure 2 HD-FISH cost analysis
Supplementary Figure 3 Distribution of spot counts for HER2 probes of decreasing
size
Supplementary Figure 4 Spotting of chromosome 1 and 17 using HD-FISH probes
Supplementary Figure 5 Frequency distribution of HER2 mRNA counts
Supplementary Note
Supplementary Video 1 3D rendering of Chr17 in HME cells, visualized with ten HD-
FISH probes evenly spaced every 8 Mb and labeled with two
alternating fluorophores (green: AlexaFluor594; magenta:
AlexaFluor647). The nucleus displayed is the same as in the
Z-projection shown in Figure 3a (mid panel).
Supplementary Video 2 3D animation of Chr17 in HME cells, visualized with sixteen
HD-FISH probes spaced evenly every 5 Mb and labeled with
two alternating fluorophores (green: AlexaFluor594; magenta:
AlexaFluor647) together with a Chr17 paint probe (blue).
Nature Methods: doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2306
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 1 (10MB)N
umbe
r of P
robe
s pe
r 100
KB
p36.
33p3
6.32
p36.
31p3
6.23
p36.
22p3
6.21
p36.
13p3
6.12
p36.
11p3
5.3
p35.
2p3
5.1
p34.
3p3
4.2
p34.
1p3
3p3
2.3
p32.
2p3
2.1
p31.
3p3
1.2
p31.
1
p22.
3p2
2.2
p22.
1p2
1.3
p21.
2p2
1.1
p13.
3p1
3.2
p13.
1p1
2p1
1.2
p11.
1q1
1
q12
q21.
1q2
1.2
q21.
3q2
2q2
3.1
q23.
2q2
3.3
q24.
1q2
4.2
q24.
3q2
5.1
q25.
2q2
5.3
q31.
1q3
1.2
q31.
3
q32.
1q3
2.2
q32.
3q4
1q4
2.11
q42.
12q4
2.13
q42.
2q4
2.3
q43
q44
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 2 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p25.
3p2
5.2
p25.
1p2
4.3
p24.
2p2
4.1
p23.
3p2
3.2
p23.
1p2
2.3
p22.
2p2
2.1
p21
p16.
3p1
6.2
p16.
1p1
5p1
4p1
3.3
p13.
2p1
3.1
p12
p11.
2p1
1.1
q11.
1q1
1.2
q12.
1q1
2.2
q12.
3q1
3q1
4.1
q14.
2q1
4.3
q21.
1q2
1.2
q21.
3q2
2.1
q22.
2q2
2.3
q23.
1q2
3.2
q23.
3q2
4.1
q24.
2q2
4.3
q31.
1q3
1.2
q31.
3q3
2.1
q32.
2q3
2.3
q33.
1q3
3.2
q33.
3q3
4q3
5q3
6.1
q36.
2q3
6.3
q37.
1q3
7.2
q37.
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 3 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p26.
3p2
6.2
p26.
1p2
5.3
p25.
2p2
5.1
p24.
3p2
4.2
p24.
1p2
3p2
2.3
p22.
2p2
2.1
p21.
33p2
1.32
p21.
31p2
1.2
p21.
1p1
4.3
p14.
2
p14.
1p1
3p1
2.3
p12.
2p1
2.1
p11.
2p1
1.1
q11.
1q1
1.2
q12.
1q1
2.2
q12.
3q1
3.11
q13.
12q1
3.13
q13.
2q1
3.31
q13.
32q1
3.33
q21.
1q2
1.2
q21.
3q2
2.1
q22.
2q2
2.3
q23
q24
q25.
1q2
5.2
q25.
31q2
5.32
q25.
33q2
6.1
q26.
2q2
6.31
q26.
32q2
6.33
q27.
1q2
7.2
q27.
3q2
8q2
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 4 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p16.
3p1
6.2
p16.
1p1
5.33
p15.
32p1
5.31
p15.
2
p15.
1
p14
p13
p12
p11
q11
q12
q13.
1
q13.
2q1
3.3
q21.
1q2
1.21
q21.
22q2
1.23
q21.
3q2
2.1
q22.
2q2
2.3
q23
q24
q25
q26
q27
q28.
1q2
8.2
q28.
3
q31.
1q3
1.21
q31.
22q3
1.23
q31.
3
q32.
1q3
2.2
q32.
3q3
3q3
4.1
q34.
2q3
4.3
q35.
1q3
5.2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 5 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p15.
33p1
5.32
p15.
31p1
5.2
p15.
1p1
4.3
p14.
2p1
4.1
p13.
3p1
3.2
p13.
1p1
2p1
1q1
1.1
q11.
2
q12.
1q1
2.2
q12.
3q1
3.1
q13.
2q1
3.3
q14.
1q1
4.2
q14.
3
q15
q21.
1q2
1.2
q21.
3q2
2.1
q22.
2q2
2.3
q23.
1
q23.
2q2
3.3
q31.
1q3
1.2
q31.
3
q32
q33.
1q3
3.2
q33.
3
q34
q35.
1q3
5.2
q35.
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 6 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p25.
3p2
5.2
p25.
1p2
4.3
p24.
2p2
4.1
p23
p22.
3
p22.
2p2
2.1
p21.
33p2
1.32
p21.
31p2
1.2
p21.
1
p12.
3p1
2.2
p12.
1p1
1.2
p11.
1q1
1.1
q11.
2q1
2
q13
q14.
1q1
4.2
q14.
3q1
5
q16.
1q1
6.2
q16.
3
q21
q22.
1q2
2.2
q22.
31q2
2.32
q22.
33q2
3.1
q23.
2q2
3.3
q24.
1q2
4.2
q24.
3q2
5.1
q25.
2q2
5.3
q26
q27
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 7 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p22.
3p2
2.2
p22.
1
p21.
3
p21.
2p2
1.1
p15.
3p1
5.2
p15.
1p1
4.3
p14.
2p1
4.1
p13
p12.
3p1
2.2
p12.
1p1
1.2
p11.
1q1
1.1
q11.
21
q11.
22
q11.
23
q21.
11
q21.
12q2
1.13
q21.
2q2
1.3
q22.
1q2
2.2
q22.
3
q31.
1
q31.
2q3
1.31
q31.
32q3
1.33
q32.
1q3
2.2
q32.
3q3
3
q34
q35
q36.
1q3
6.2
q36.
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 8 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p23.
3p2
3.2
p23.
1
p22
p21.
3
p21.
2p2
1.1
p12
p11.
23p1
1.22
p11.
21p1
1.1
q11.
1q1
1.21
q11.
22q1
1.23
q12.
1q1
2.2
q12.
3q1
3.1
q13.
2q1
3.3
q21.
11q2
1.12
q21.
13q2
1.2
q21.
3
q22.
1
q22.
2q2
2.3
q23.
1q2
3.2
q23.
3q2
4.11
q24.
12
q24.
13
q24.
21
q24.
22
q24.
23
q24.
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 9 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p24.
3p2
4.2
p24.
1
p23
p22.
3p2
2.2
p22.
1p2
1.3
p21.
2
p21.
1
p13.
3p1
3.2
p13.
1p1
2p1
1.2
p11.
1q1
1
q12
q13
q21.
11q2
1.12
q21.
13q2
1.2
q21.
31q2
1.32
q21.
33q2
2.1
q22.
2q2
2.31
q22.
32q2
2.33
q31.
1
q31.
2q3
1.3
q32
q33.
1
q33.
2
q33.
3
q34.
11q3
4.12
q34.
13q3
4.2
q34.
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 10 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p15.
3p1
5.2
p15.
1
p14
p13
p12.
33p1
2.32
p12.
31p1
2.2
p12.
1p1
1.23
p11.
22p1
1.21
p11.
1q1
1.1
q11.
21
q11.
22q1
1.23
q21.
1
q21.
2
q21.
3
q22.
1q2
2.2
q22.
3
q23.
1
q23.
2q2
3.31
q23.
32q2
3.33
q24.
1q2
4.2
q24.
31q2
4.32
q24.
33q2
5.1
q25.
2q2
5.3
q26.
11q2
6.12
q26.
13
q26.
2
q26.
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 11 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p15.
5
p15.
4
p15.
3p1
5.2
p15.
1
p14.
3p1
4.2
p14.
1
p13
p12
p11.
2
p11.
12p1
1.11 q11
q12.
1q1
2.2
q12.
3q1
3.1
q13.
2q1
3.3
q13.
4q1
3.5
q14.
1
q14.
2q1
4.3
q21
q22.
1q2
2.2
q22.
3
q23.
1q2
3.2
q23.
3
q24.
1q2
4.2
q24.
3q2
5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 12 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p13.
33p1
3.32
p13.
31
p13.
2p1
3.1
p12.
3p1
2.2
p12.
1p1
1.23
p11.
22p1
1.21
p11.
1q1
1
q12
q13.
11q1
3.12
q13.
13q1
3.2
q13.
3q1
4.1
q14.
2q1
4.3
q15
q21.
1
q21.
2
q21.
31
q21.
32q2
1.33 q22
q23.
1
q23.
2
q23.
3
q24.
11q2
4.12
q24.
13q2
4.21
q24.
22q2
4.23
q24.
31
q24.
32
q24.
33
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 13 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p13
p12
p11.
2
p11.
1q1
1q1
2.11
q12.
12q1
2.13
q12.
2q1
2.3
q13.
1q1
3.2
q13.
3
q14.
11q1
4.12
q14.
13q1
4.2
q14.
3
q21.
1
q21.
2q2
1.31
q21.
32
q21.
33
q22.
1q2
2.2
q22.
3
q31.
1
q31.
2
q31.
3
q32.
1q3
2.2
q32.
3q3
3.1
q33.
2q3
3.3
q34
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 14 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p13
p12
p11.
2
p11.
1q1
1.1
q11.
2
q12
q13.
1q1
3.2
q13.
3
q21.
1
q21.
2
q21.
3
q22.
1q2
2.2
q22.
3
q23.
1
q23.
2
q23.
3q2
4.1
q24.
2
q24.
3
q31.
1q3
1.2
q31.
3
q32.
11q3
2.12
q32.
13
q32.
2
q32.
31q3
2.32
q32.
33
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 15 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p13
p12
p11.
2
p11.
1q1
1.1
q11.
2
q12
q13.
1q1
3.2
q13.
3
q14
q15.
1q1
5.2
q15.
3
q21.
1
q21.
2
q21.
3
q22.
1q2
2.2
q22.
31q2
2.32
q22.
33 q23
q24.
1q2
4.2
q24.
3q2
5.1
q25.
2
q25.
3
q26.
1
q26.
2
q26.
3
a
1
Nature Methods: doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2306
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 16 (10MB)N
umbe
r of P
robe
s pe
r 100
KB
p13.
3
p13.
2p1
3.13
p13.
12p1
3.11
p12.
3
p12.
2
p12.
1
p11.
2
p11.
1q1
1.1
q11.
2
q12.
1
q12.
2q1
3
q21
q22.
1
q22.
2q2
2.3
q23.
1
q23.
2
q23.
3
q24.
1q2
4.2
q24.
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 17 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p13.
3
p13.
2
p13.
1
p12
p11.
2
p11.
1q1
1.1
q11.
2
q12
q21.
1q2
1.2
q21.
31
q21.
32
q21.
33 q22
q23.
1q2
3.2
q23.
3q2
4.1
q24.
2
q24.
3
q25.
1
q25.
2
q25.
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 18 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p11.
32
p11.
31
p11.
23p1
1.22
p11.
21
p11.
1q1
1.1
q11.
2
q12.
1
q12.
2
q12.
3
q21.
1
q21.
2
q21.
31
q21.
32
q21.
33
q22.
1
q22.
2
q22.
3
q23
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 19 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p13.
3
p13.
2
p13.
13p1
3.12
p13.
11 p12
p11
q11
q12
q13.
11
q13.
12
q13.
13
q13.
2
q13.
31
q13.
32
q13.
33
q13.
41
q13.
42
q13.
430 1 2 3 4 5 6
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 20 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p13
p12.
3
p12.
2
p12.
1
p11.
23
p11.
22
p11.
21
p11.
1
q11.
1
q11.
21
q11.
22
q11.
23 q12
q13.
11
q13.
12
q13.
13
q13.
2
q13.
31
q13.
32
q13.
33
0 1 2 3 4
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 21 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p13
p12
p11.
2
p11.
1
q11.
1
q11.
2
q21.
1
q21.
2
q21.
3
q22.
11
q22.
12
q22.
13
q22.
2
q22.
3
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 22 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p13
p12
p11.
2
p11.
1
q11.
1
q11.
21
q11.
22
q11.
23
q12.
1
q12.
2
q12.
3
q13.
1
q13.
2
q13.
31
q13.
32
q13.
33
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along X Chromosome (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p22.
33p2
2.32
p22.
31
p22.
2
p22.
13p2
2.12
p22.
11p2
1.3
p21.
2p2
1.1
p11.
4
p11.
3p1
1.23
p11.
22p1
1.21
p11.
1q1
1.1
q11.
2q1
2q1
3.1
q13.
2q1
3.3
q21.
1
q21.
2q2
1.31
q21.
32q2
1.33
q22.
1q2
2.2
q22.
3
q23
q24
q25
q26.
1q2
6.2
q26.
3q2
7.1
q27.
2q2
7.3
q28
0 1 2 3 4 5
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Y Chromosome (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
p11.
32p1
1.31
p11.
2
p11.
1q1
1.1
q11.
21
q11.
221
q11.
222
q11.
223
q11.
23 q12
a
Nature Methods: doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2306
5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 1 (10MB)N
um
ber
of P
robes p
er
100K
B
qA
1
qA
2
qA
3
qA
4
qA
5
qB
qC
1.1
qC
1.2
qC
1.3
qC
2
qC
3
qC
4
qC
5
qD
qE
1.1
qE
1.2
qE
2.1
qE
2.2
qE
2.3
qE
3
qE
4
qF
qG
1q
G2
qG
3
qH
1
qH
2.1
qH
2.2
qH
2.3
qH
3
qH
4
qH
5
qH
6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 2 (10MB)
Num
ber
of P
robes p
er
100K
B
qA
1
qA
2
qA
3
qB
qC
1.1
qC
1.2
qC
1.3
qC
2
qC
3
qD
qE
1
qE
2
qE
3
qE
4
qE
5
qF
1
qF
2
qF
3
qG
1
qG
2
qG
3
qH
1
qH
2
qH
3
qH
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 3 (10MB)
Num
ber
of P
robes p
er
100K
B
qA
1
qA
2
qA
3
qB
qC
qD
qE
1
qE
2
qE
3
qF
1
qF
2.1
qF
2.2
qF
2.3
qF
3
qG
1
qG
2
qG
3
qH
1
qH
2
qH
3
qH
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 15 (10MB)
Num
ber
of P
robes p
er
100K
B
qA
1
qA
2
qB
1
qB
2
qB
3.1
qB
3.2
qB
3.3
qC
qD
1
qD
2
qD
3
qE
1
qE
2
qE
3
qF
1
qF
2q
F3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 4 (10MB)
Num
ber
of P
robes p
er
100K
B
qA
1
qA
2
qA
3
qA
4
qA
5
qB
1
qB
2
qB
3
qC
1
qC
2
qC
3
qC
4
qC
5
qC
6
qC
7
qD
1
qD
2.1
qD
2.2
qD
2.3
qD
3
qE
1
qE
2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 5 (10MB)
Num
ber
of P
robes p
er
100K
B
qA
1
qA
2
qA
3
qB
1
qB
2
qB
3
qC
1
qC
2
qC
3.1
qC
3.2
qC
3.3
qD
qE
1
qE
2
qE
3
qE
4
qE
5
qF
qG
1.1
qG
1.2
qG
1.3
qG
2
qG
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 6 (10MB)
Num
ber
of P
robes p
er
100K
B
qA
1
qA
2
qA
3.1
qA
3.2
qA
3.3
qB
1
qB
2.1
qB
2.2
qB
2.3
qB
3
qC
1
qC
2
qC
3
qD
1
qD
2
qD
3
qE
1
qE
2
qE
3
qF
1
qF
2
qF
3
qG
1
qG
2
qG
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 7 (10MB)
Num
ber
of P
robes p
er
100K
B
qA
1
qA
2
qA
3
qB
1
qB
2
qB
3
qB
4
qB
5
qC
qD
1
qD
2
qD
3
qE
1
qE
2
qE
3
qF
1
qF
2
qF
3
qF
4
qF
5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 8 (10MB)
Num
ber
of P
robes p
er
100K
B
qA
1.1
qA
1.2
qA
1.3
qA
2
qA
3
qA
4
qB
1.1
qB
1.2
qB
1.3
qB
2
qB
3.1
qB
3.2
qB
3.3
qC
1
qC
2
qC
3
qC
4
qC
5
qD
1
qD
2
qD
3
qE
1
qE
2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 9 (10MB)
Num
ber
of P
robes p
er
100K
B
qA
1
qA
2
qA
3
qA
4
qA
5.1
qA
5.2
qA
5.3
qB
qC
qD
qE
1
qE
2
qE
3.1
qE
3.2
qE
3.3
qE
4
qF
1
qF
2
qF
3
qF
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 10 (10MB)
Num
ber
of P
robes p
er
100K
B
qA
1
qA
2
qA
3
qA
4
qB
1
qB
2
qB
3
qB
4
qB
5.1
qB
5.2
qB
5.3
qC
1
qC
2
qC
3
qD
1
qD
2
qD
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 11 (10MB)
Num
ber
of P
robes p
er
100K
B
qA
1
qA
2
qA
3.1
qA
3.2
qA
3.3
qA
4
qA
5
qB
1.1
qB
1.2
qB
1.3
qB
2
qB
3
qB
4
qB
5
qC
qD
qE
1
qE
2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 12 (10MB)
Nu
mb
er
of
Pro
be
s p
er
10
0K
B
qA
1.1
qA
1.2
qA
1.3
qA
2
qA
3
qB
1
qB
2
qB
3
qC
1
qC
2
qC
3
qD
1
qD
2
qD
3
qE
qF
1
qF
2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 13 (10MB)
Num
ber
of P
robes p
er
100K
B
qA
1
qA
2
qA
3.1
qA
3.2
qA
3.3
qA
4
qA
5
qB
1
qB
2
qB
3
qC
1
qC
2
qC
3
qD
1
qD
2.1
qD
2.2
qD
2.3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 14 (10MB)
Num
ber
of P
robes p
er
100K
B
qA
1
qA
2
qA
3
qB
qC
1
qC
2
qC
3
qD
1
qD
2
qD
3
qE
1
qE
2.1
qE
2.2
qE
2.3
qE
3
qE
4
qE
5
b
Nature Methods: doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2306
6
Supplementary Figure 1: Density of unique HD-FISH amplicons along the human (a) and
mouse (b) genome. G-bands ideograms are displayed.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 16 (10MB)N
umbe
r of P
robe
s pe
r 100
KB
qA1
qA2
qA3
qB1
qB2
qB3
qB4
qB5
qC1.
1qC
1.2
qC1.
3
qC2
qC3.
1
qC3.
2
qC3.
3
qC4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 18 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
qA1
qA2
qB1
qB2
qB3
qC qD1
qD2
qD3
qE1
qE2
qE3
qE4
0 1
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Y Chromosome (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
qA1
qA2 qB qC1
qC2
qC3
qD qE
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 17 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
qA1
qA2
qA3.
1
qA3.
2
qA3.
3
qB1
qB2
qB3
qC qD
qE1.
1
qE1.
2
qE1.
3
qE2
qE3
qE4
qE5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along Chromosome 19 (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
qA qB qC1
qC2
qC3
qD1
qD2
qD3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Genomic Position Along X Chromosome (10MB)
Num
ber o
f Pro
bes
per 1
00KB
qA1.
1
qA1.
2qA
1.3
qA2
qA3.
1qA
3.2
qA3.
3
qA4
qA5
qA6
qA7.
1qA
7.2
qA7.
3 qB qC1
qC2
qC3
qD qE1
qE2
qE3
qF1
qF2
qF3
qF4
qF5
b
Nature Methods: doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2306
7
Supplementary Figure 2: HD-FISH cost analysis. (a) Cumulative cost as a function of the
number of tests per probe in three different scenarios. Costs include synthesis of PCR primers
and reagents for PCR, PCR purification, labeling, and preparation of hybridization solutions.
Costs for other consumables (e.g. gloves, pipette tips, etc.) as well as for instrument
depreciation and personnel are excluded. (b) Linear dependence of primer synthesis cost on
the number of probes and amplicons per probe.
a
cum
ulat
ive
cost
x 1
,000
(USD
)
0500 1000
48 amplicons / probe
0
50
10024 amplicons / probe
150
12 amplicons / probe
# probes
b
0 200
400
600
80010
0012
0014
0016
0018
0020
0022
0024
0002468
1012141618202224
tests / probe
cum
ulat
ive
cost
x 1
,000
(USD
) 20 probes (48 amplicons / probe)
10 probes (24 amplicons / probe)
1 probe (24 amplicons / probe)
Nature Methods: doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2306
8
Supplementary Figure 3: Distribution of spot counts for HER2 probes of decreasing size in
HME cells. The number of amplicons from which each probe was derived is shown. Numbers
in brackets represents ETS values. n: number of cells analyzed.
0
10
20
30
40
50
# spots / nucleus
15 amplicons (3 kb)
51 2 3 4
n = 134
0
10
20
30
40
50
# spots / nucleus
19 amplicons (3.8 kb)
51 2 3 4
n = 92
0
10
20
30
40
50
# spots / nucleus
24 amplicons (4.8 kb)
51 2 3 4
n = 99
0 1 2 3 40
10
20
30
40
50
# spots / nucleus
10 amplicons (2 kb)
n = 75
rela
tive
frequ
ency
(%)
Nature Methods: doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2306
9
Supplementary Figure 4: (a) Genomic location of individual probes forming the spotting
probes for Chr1 and Chr17 described. Magenta: AlexaFluor647-labeled probes. Green:
AlexaFluor594-labeled probes. G-bands ideograms and band names are displayed. (b) Chr1
spotting with twenty-two alternatively labeled HD-FISH probes (green and magenta), and
simultaneous Chr1 painting (blue) in HME cells. (c) Inter-channel concordance for spot
counts shown in Figure 3b. The linear regression fit line of slope m is shown. (d) Single-cell
distribution of the difference between error estimates of HD-FISH spot counts measured
a
-12 -8 -4difference between AF647 and AF594 spot counts
0 4 8 12
n = 744
rela
tive
frequ
ency
(%)
20
25
10
0
15
5
2
6
10
1430
20
10
0
Alex
aFlu
or 5
94
AlexaFluor 647
3020100
# observations
m = 0.96
b c
d
e
p36.33p36.32p36.31p36.23p36.22p36.21p36.13p36.12p36.11p35.3p35.2p35.1p34.3
p34.2p34.1
p33
p32.3p32.2p32.1
p31.3
p31.2
p31.1
p22.3p22.2p22.1p21.3p21.2p21.1
p13.3
p13.2p13.1
p12p11.2p11.1
q11
q12
q21.1q21.2q21.3
q22q23.1q23.2q23.3q24.1q24.2q24.3q25.1q25.2
q25.3
q31.1q31.2q31.3
q32.1
q32.2q32.3
q41
q42.11q42.12q42.13q42.2q42.3
q43
q44
x 10
p13.3
p13.2
p13.1
p12
p11.2
p11.1q11.1
q11.2
q12
q21.1q21.2
q21.31
q21.32
q21.33
q22
q23.1q23.2q23.3q24.1q24.2
q24.3
q25.1q25.2
q25.3
x 10
p13.3
p13.2
p13.1
p12
p11.2
p11.1q11.1
q11.2
q12
q21.1q21.2
q21.31
q21.32
q21.33
q22
q23.1q23.2q23.3q24.1q24.2
q24.3
q25.1q25.2
q25.3
Chr17
Chr1
AF647 AF594
AF647 + AF594 PaintAF647 + AF594
Spotting Paint
f
Nature Methods: doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2306
10
simultaneously in the AlexaFluor 594 and 647 channels. These data reflect gene copy
number-invariant noise and demonstrate that the respective channel estimates are unbiased
relative to each other (median value = 0) and symmetric (quartile skewness = 0). n: number of
cells analyzed. (e) Representative field of view with HME cells simultaneously hybridized
with a Chr17 spotting probe consisting of sixteen HD-FISH probes (left) and with a paint
probe (right). Small panels: zoom-in view of the area marked by the white dashed square.
AF647: AlexaFluor647; AF594: AlexaFluor594. (f) Comparison of Chr17 spotting (green and
magenta) and painting (blue) in several Z-projections.
Nature Methods: doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2306
11
Supplementary Figure 5: Frequency distribution of HER2 mRNA counts in HME cells with
2 (purple), 3 (orange), or 4 (brown) HER2 loci detected by HD-FISH. Gaussian fits are
superimposed onto histograms. n: number of cells analyzed.
0 10 20 30 40# mRNA
Rel
ativ
e fre
quen
cy (%
)
20
25
10
15
0
5
n = 445
Nature Methods: doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2306
12
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE
In order for HD-FISH to attract a wide audience (including diagnostics laboratories and
industrial parties), economic measures of its performance must be obtained in addition to
scientific ones. For this purpose, we have performed cost effectiveness analysis in the
following three scenarios. The first case is relevant to both research laboratories that
occasionally need to perform DNA FISH on loci for which there are no ready-to-use probes
commercially available, as well as to cytogenetics laboratories that wish to rapidly generate
probes for rare rearrangements for which no commercial probes are available. The second
case is relevant to diagnostics laboratories that perform a high volume of routine
hybridizations against a limited number of loci, and that wish to reduce reagents costs. The
third case is relevant to policy makers and healthcare systems organizers that are willing to
financially support initiatives aiming at improving the efficiency of high quality diagnostics
by cutting reagents costs and optimizing processes.
CASE 1. Let us imagine the case in which a particular locus (or a small number of loci) for
which no commercial probes are available needs to be analyzed for research or diagnostic
purposes. An investment of approx. $1,880 allows purchase of primers for 24 amplicons
(which allows robust signal quantification as shown in the new Supplementary Fig. 2a) and
for all the reagents needed for PCR, labeling, purification, and hybridization. This investment
enables approx. 900 tests (i.e. hybridizations with 20 ng of probe in 20 µL buffer) at no extra
costs, after which the cumulative cost grows in a pseudo-linear, step-wise manner at very
slow pace, mostly driven by the need to periodically replenish PCR and labeling reagents
(Supplementary Fig. 2a). An extra starting investment of $900, for example, enables ten
HD-FISH probes to be simultaneously prepared in the same cost-effective manner as outlined
above, allowing 90 tests per probe to be performed at no extra cost (Supplementary Fig. 2a).
In comparison, custom design and BACs-based synthesis of ready-to-use probes for the same
number of loci enabling at least 90 tests per probe would at minimum require $8,000-10,000
(data based on quote requests to several DNA FISH probes manufacturers, including Empire
Genomics, Kreatech Diagnostics, and Abnova).
CASE 2. Let us imagine the case in which a limited set of probes (e.g. 20) is routinely used
for diagnostic purposes. An investment of less than $5,800 allows purchasing primers sets for
20 probes, each consisting of 48 amplicons (which based on our results allows robust signal
quantification in cells as well as tissues), as well as reagents needed for PCR, labeling,
Nature Methods: doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2306
13
purification, and hybridization. After 45 initial tests per probe at no extra cost, the cumulative
cost rises in a pseudo-linear, step-wise manner, mostly driven by the need to periodically
replenish PCR and labeling reagents (Supplementary Fig. 2a). The cost effectiveness of this
approach is obvious by examining the cumulative cost (approx. $8,000) after 200 tests per
probe (i.e. 4,000 tests in total, assuming that each probe is used with the same frequency), a
figure perfectly within the range of average annual volume of tests performed by medium-
sized cytogenetics laboratories. In contrast, performing the same volume of tests for 20
different ready-to-use probes periodically purchased from existing commercial providers
would require a budget at least 5-fold higher (as an example, $2,500 is the price charged by a
top manufacturer for a ready-to-use probe for 50 tests. Even assuming a 20% discount from
the price list for large order volumes, purchase of probes for 20 different loci for 200
tests/probe would require $160,000).
CASE 3. Though surely cost effective in the cases depicted above, the start-up cost of HD-
FISH linearly grows with the number of primers (i.e. probes), quickly exceeding the financial
capabilities of a single laboratory (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Moreover, even at the lowest
possible synthesis scale, a large fraction of primers would remain unused, as it is basically
impossible for a single laboratory to reach the maximum number of tests (> 8 millions
hybridizations using 20 ng of probe in 20 µL buffer per test) that can be performed from a 96-
well plate containing 12 nmol primers per well. Instead, a consortium funded by public
resources and administered as a non-profit repository could build up a primers stock covering
the human and mouse genomes for less than $20 million. This budget is well within the
average funding that public agencies have been granting to such type of initiatives in the U.S.
as well as in the E.U. This would enable laboratories worldwide to purchase primers or even
pre-made PCR reactions at low price, therefore greatly facilitating high-quality FISH-based
research and diagnostics services, especially in emerging economies.
Nature Methods: doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2306
14
SUPPLEMENTARY VIDEO LEGENDS
All movies are in .mov format and can be played for example using QuickTime Player.
Supplementary Video 1: 3D rendering of Chr17 in HME cells, visualized with ten HD-FISH
probes evenly spaced every 8 Mb and labeled with two alternating fluorophores (green:
AlexaFluor594; magenta: AlexaFluor647). The nucleus displayed is the same as in the Z-
projection shown in Figure 3a (mid panel).
Supplementary Video 2: 3D animation of Chr17 in HME cells, visualized with sixteen HD-
FISH probes spaced evenly every 5 Mb and labeled with two alternating fluorophores (green:
AlexaFluor594; magenta: AlexaFluor647) together with a Chr17 paint probe (blue).
Nature Methods: doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2306