master plan for english language learners - … saratoga school district’s master plan for english...

A Design for Excellence and Equity

Master Plan for English Language Learners

Saratoga Union School District

2009

Saratoga Union School District - 2008 Master Plan for English Language Learners | 2

Introduction The Saratoga School District’s Master Plan for English Language Learners is a result of collaboration and commitment with and to all members of the school community. The plan ensures not just compliance with regulations for our English learners but also serves as a roadmap to provide equity and opportunity for all students. Our goal is to have students matriculate from the Saratoga Elementary School District with the academic and social skills and experiences that equip them to succeed in the global environment of the 21st century. It is our responsibility to meet this need and prepare our students for the challenges they will face.

The plan also focuses on aspects of professional development to assist teachers and staff to work effectively with a diverse student population.

The district’s Master Plan for English Language Learners is based on state and federal laws, district board policies, research, pedagogy, and practice.


Chapter ONE

Identification, Assessment and Placement

1. Initial Identification, Assessment and Program Placement

Step 1: Registration, including completion of the Home Language Survey

The registration form completed by the parents when a child is first enrolled in the Saratoga Union School District includes a Home Language Survey, as required by state law. The language information is recorded in the Student Information System (SIS) and maintained thereafter. If answers to items 1, 2 and 3 on the Home Language Survey are “English”, the child is classified as English Only (EO). The child is scheduled in a class with no further attention to language designation.

Step 2: English Language Proficiency Assessment

State regulations require that all students whose Home Language Survey indicates that a language other than English is used at home, complete English language proficiency testing within 30 calendar days of initial enrollment.


The assessment used to determine initial English proficiency is the California English Language Development Test (CELDT). The CELDT is a non-timed standardized language proficiency test designed to measure the English fluency of non-native speakers. Trained district personnel administer the CELDT within 30 calendar days of enrollment. The goal is to provide the initial assessment to student’s as soon as possible so services can be provided if required.

If items 1, 2 OR 3 on the Home Language Survey are answered with a language other than English, the child is tested for English proficiency with the California English Language

Development Test (CELDT) within 30 calendar days of enrollment.

Any student with a disability shall take the CELDT with those accommodations for testing that the student has regularly used during instruction and classroom assessment as delineated in the student’s individualized education program (IEP) or Section 504 plan that are appropriate and necessary to address the student’s individual needs.

The child receives a score on each part of the test taken (Listening, Speaking, Reading, and Writing) as well as an overall score. The score types used include: raw score, scale score and proficiency level. A preliminary score is calculated for purposes of placement. The preliminary results are communicated to the parent via the Preliminary Program Placement form. The CELDT assessments are forwarded for official scoring by the test publisher. These official results override the informal scoring in those cases where the scores differ. CELDT results and the Preliminary Program Placement form are stored in the orange ELL folder inside the student’s cumulative folder, and in the district’s database (SIS) for future use in monitoring student progress and program evaluation.

On the basis of the English language assessment, students are classified as either Initially Fluent English Proficient (IFEP) or as an English Language Learner (ELL). The parents of IFEP students are informed of the results, and placement is made in a similar fashion as the English Only (EO) students. English Language Learners proceed to parent notification of results and placement (Step 3).

Step 3: Parent Notification of Results and Placement

Upon completion of the assessment(s), parents are notified of the results and given a description of the available program options. This preliminary notification will be provided in writing within the first 30 days of the school year.

The results of the Home Language Survey and the language assessment(s) (and, in the case of transfer students, the results of a review of transcripts and previous program placement noted on the registration form) are used to define the options open to the student for program placement.

Structured English Immersion (SEI) Program - Pullout EL classes in addition to Classroom CLAD Credentialed Teacher

Mainstream English Program – Classroom

CLAD Credentialed Teacher

The Options for English Language Learners

The process will include determination of the most appropriate ELL program for the student. This is determined in the following manner:

Determine whether the student is reasonably fluent in English. The criteria for reasonable fluency in English are the same as the criteria for “Possibly Fluent English Proficient” in the CELDT Scoring Guide. They Include:

1. Student’s overall proficiency level is “Early Advanced” or higher, and 2. Each skill area proficiency level is “Intermediate” or higher.

If the child is reasonably fluent in English by these criteria, a placement in a Mainstream English Program is recommended, including additional support services that are appropriate. In this case, the child continues in that placement until reclassified. Support services in the mainstream program must include one of more of the following, as needed:

Content instruction using SDAIE techniques Specialized instruction by a Reading Specialist English Language Development Participation in intensive interventions Summer school Other appropriate services

If the child is not reasonably fluent in English by the above criteria, then a placement in a Structured English Immersion (SEI) Program is recommended. In SEI, the instruction is nearly all in English, with the primary language used to support the child’s learning as necessary. The types of support services listed in the previous paragraph are also provided as needed.

At the time of the parental notification, all placement options are explained. By completing a waiver, the parent may decline participation, electing to have a child placed in a mainstream program. The district will honor the parent’s informed preference to opt their child out of the Structured English Immersion Program and the parent must sign the appropriate waiver:

Structured English Immersion Program Parental Exception Waiver Ed. Code 311(a): Children who know English

Structured English Immersion Program Parental Exception Waiver Ed. Code 311(b): Children age 10 or older

Structured English Immersion Program Parental Exception Waiver Ed. Code 311(c): Children with Special Needs

Parents may choose to opt out of a program for the student, but cannot opt out of ELL services provided to the student (i.e., ELD instruction, ELD testing, intervention, catch up plan, etc.). Parent’s must personally visit the school to apply for a waiver. Waivers are reconsidered annually, each school year.

Step 4: Program Placement

Once the program options and recommended placement have been explained, an appropriate program is assigned to the student based on the parent’s decision. If the parent selects an alternative program, then the parent must complete and file a Parental Exception Waiver request at the child’s school site. The Preliminary Program Placement Notification form is placed in the student’s orange ELL folder.

When the CELDT results are received from the test publisher, the parent is notified in writing by the school. Parents of students who are taking the CELDT for the first time will receive the Initial CELDT Results Parent Notification form. ELLs will be assessed annually with the CELDT and parents will receive the CELDT Results Parent Notification form and the CELDT Information for Parents and Guardians. This written notification is in English and in the student’s primary language if available. A copy is placed in the student’s orange ELL folder. The student’s orange ELL folder must contain any primary language test results, a copy of CELDT results, and (for students who have opted for an alternative program) a copy of the Parental Exception Waiver form.


Legislative Restriction on Enrollment in Alternative Programs

According to California’s Education Code (305, 306, 310, 311, 48985), the following types of ELL students under 10 years of age must be placed in a mainstream or SEI program for at least 30 days before a parent’s request for an alternative program can be honored:

a. Students in a California school for the first time New kindergarten students Transfers from out of state Students entering a U.S. school for the first time

b. Students transferring from another California school who have not completed the 30-day requirement in another school

All other ELLs, including those who have completed the 30-day requirement at another school, may enter an alternative program immediately.

Training for Staff and Administrators on Initial Identification, Placement and Parental Rights / Informed Consent

The district provides ongoing training for administrators and staff on procedures relating to initial identification, placement, parental rights and informed consent, including the waiver process. The persons to be trained include school principals and office staff members, counselors, ELL specialists, teachers, para-educators, and other staff as necessary. In order to ensure consistency, the training gives special emphasis on sensitivity to parents, including how to make parents feel welcome, and how to ensure that they are truly informed and enabled to take an active role in the process of deciding on an appropriate program for their child.


Figure 1.1: Assessment for Initial Identification and Program Placement

HOME LANGUAGE Is other than English

Assess English with CELDT within 30 days

GRADES K-1 Listening and Speaking

GRADES 2-6 Listening, Speaking, Reading,

Writing

Place in Mainstream

Program

English Only

HOME LANGUAGE SURVEYCompleted

Place in

Mainstream Program

Place in Appropriate EL

Program

SEI

English Learner

Feedback from classroom teacher STAR test results

Report cards Parent input

other

Needs EL services

Does not need EL services

CELDT scores borderline

Parent Notification

Initially Fluent

English

Proficient

Mainstream

Parent Notification



Chapter TWO

Instructional Programs

2. Instructional Programs

The Saratoga School District offers two program options to English Language Learners; Structured English Immersion and Mainstream English. Each of these options is designed to ensure that students acquire English-language proficiency and recoup any academic deficits that may have developed in other areas of the core curriculum. Both options contain the following required components:

Well articulated standards-based, differentiated English Language Development (ELD) instruction, specifically designed for English Language Learners.

Well articulated standards-based, differentiated instruction in the core curriculum, with Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE)

Structured activities designed to develop multiculture proficiency and positive self-esteem.

Regardless of the program option provided, each ELL is expected to make progress in English and in grade level academics. The Board Policy for the Education of English Language Learners states that students will be provided with a challenging core curriculum and instruction that develops proficiency in English as rapidly and effectively as possible in order to assist the student become a productive member of society. ELD instruction begins in kindergarten, and should equip participants in either program to participate effectively in mainstream English language instruction.

English Language Development

English Language Development (ELD) is a component of all program options for English Language Learners. The ELD component is based on the California Language Development standards and provides a pathway to the English Language Arts (ELA) standards. Both ELD and ELA standards have the goal of assisting students to develop skills related to cognitive academic proficiency in English. Instruction must develop the ELL’s full receptive and expressive proficiencies in the domains of listening, speaking, reading, and writing.

ELD instruction provides an on-ramp to the English language arts curriculum. It should build academic language proficiency that includes functions, forms and fluency. This approach, places meaning and use as the central features of language and approaches grammar from that perspective. The district supports the use of rigorous ELD instruction that includes both informal and formal language learning opportunities. Emphasis is also placed on natural language acquisition, with appropriate use of direct instruction of academic language.

Instruction in ELD and other curricular areas involves the use of scaffolding content to make it accessible for all ELL students. Scaffolding is a special kind of instructional assistance that allows the learners to move toward new skills, concepts, or levels of understanding. Providing support, the teacher helps a student know how to do something that the learner will later be able to complete alone. (Pauline Gibbons, Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding Learning, 2002). Therefore, the instruction addresses the variety of English proficiency levels but also works towards building academic language using scaffolds, building on prior knowledge and using multiple opportunities for students to engage in academic language use. Specific scaffolding strategies may include building connections between what students know and are learning, visual aids, cooperative learning strategies and differentiated instruction strategies.

All schools are expected to use state-adopted ELD materials or state-designated ELD materials that provide full access to the California ELD standards, and that can ensure effective and efficient mastery of English as a foundation for further success in mainstream English instruction.

Various conditions help facilitate second language acquisition and development. Language is comprehensible to the English learner when:

It is in context;

It has real-life purpose;

Prior knowledge is activated;

Background knowledge is developed;

The affective filter is low;

Risk-taking and approximations are encouraged;

Errors are accepted as part of the acquisition process;


Input is comprehensible through contextualization (e.g., the use of real objects or “realia”, props, visual, facial expressions, and/or gestures);

Positive feedback and correction by modeling are used.

Tansferability of Skills

New learning is achieved most successfully when introduced in connection to prior knowledge. Students are able to transfer knowledge from one language to another given adequate instruction, support and opportunities to make connections. Many skills in English are either totally or partially transferable from another language. For instance, when a student understands the concept of synonyms, in his primary language, such as Spanish, he would be able to transfer the concept into the new language (English). In many cases, decoding in English will not need to be taught separately for a student who can decode in Spanish. The exceptions, however, do need to be taught. For instance, the vowels in English are only partially transferable, since some short vowels do not exist in Spanish. A challenge is that there are some concepts that are not transferable at all, or that differ greatly, depending on the primary language of the student. Transferable skills are directly taught so that students make the connection between their primary language and English. Transferability of skills is possible when instruction about a specific concept or skill has already taken place in the student’s primary language. The teacher then gradually assists the student in moving the knowledge from the primary language to the second language.

Time for ELD

English Language Development is part of the school day for every ELL throughout the entire school year. The teaching of English within the program is based on the students’ level of English proficiency. The purpose of the ELD component is to teach second language learners to communicate with high levels of understanding in English. ELD also provides a foundation for literacy development in reading and writing. It is a planned, specific, explicit component of the student’s total educational program and is based on the student’s level of English proficiency. An English Learner student must receive ELD instruction for the entire school year, until the student is reclassified.


Instructional Programs at the Elementary Level

Figure 2.1 describes the program options available in elementary schools. The two options, Structured English Immersion (SEI) and Mainstream English Programs, are English language programs where primary language support may be provided, but instruction is predominantly in English.

The manner of delivery of ELD varies from setting to setting. ELD may be taught within a self-contained classroom or through a teaming arrangement in which students are leveled and working in individual or small groups. The manner of delivery is contingent upon the specific school and program setting. In deciding on the most appropriate manner of delivery, such conditions as the number of ELLs in the classroom, the variation in English language level, and the program option are taken into consideration. The selection of a delivery option needs to optimize the effectiveness of ELD instruction with the constraints of the particular situation.

While the two programs, Structured English Immersion and Mainstream English, have a distinct purpose of focus, all programs are expected to lead to the goals specified in Chapter 6, Evaluation and Accountability.

Figure 2.1: Elementary Programs

Structured English Immersion Program Mainstream English Program

Summary: A specialized process of teaching the English language to students whose first language is not English. The goal is for students to develop academic proficiency in English together with mastery of academic core content and multicultural proficiency. Instruction is nearly all in English. Primary language support is used for clarification and explanation when feasible.

The goal of English Learners in the Mainstream English Program is to develop academic proficiency in English together with mastery of academic core content and multicultural proficiency. Instruction is overwhelmingly in English. However, special support options are provided for ELLs as needed.

Students Served: ELLs who have not yet acquired “reasonable fluency” in English (see Chapter 1 for a definition of reasonable fluency)

Fluent English Proficient (FEP) students.

Reclassified English Language Learners (RFEP)

ELLs whose parents/guardians have declined participation in Sheltered English Immersion programs.

ELLs who are “reasonably fluent” in English

Program Components: Daily English Language Development (ELD) at the assessed stage of English acquisition.

Individual or small group instruction for ELD as required to meet student needs based on ELD levels. No more than two consecutive levels of English proficiency may be combined for ELD instruction.

Differentiated instruction in reading, writing, math, science and social science, delivered through specially designed academic instruction in English (SDAIE) methodology, using state-approved, District adopted, standards-based materials.

Daily English Language Development (ELD) for ELLs at the assessed stage of English acquisition.

Individual or small group instruction for ELD as required to meet student needs based on ELD levels. No more than two consecutive levels of English proficiency may be combined for ELD instruction.

Differentiated instruction in reading, writing, math, science, and social science, delivered in English using decreasing SDAIE strategies. Use of state-approved, district-adopted, standards-based materials.

Special Support Options: Specialized instruction by reading specialists

Participation in intensive interventions

Summer school

Other appropriate services

Specialized instruction by reading specialists


Summer school



Instructional Programs for Middle School (Grade 6-8)

The instructional program options for middle school are the same as in the elementary schools; Structured English Immersion and Mainstream English Program; however, the program looks a little different.

In order for ELLs to be appropriately placed, the resources and assets that they bring to the educational setting will be identified. Upon entering middle school, several factors are considered:

1. Language assets and needs: students’ proficiencies in both the primary and second language

2. Prior education: an analysis of academic preparation

3. Family background: the educational foundation that begins at home and in the community is assessed.

Once ELL assets have been identified, every effort will be made to develop an individualized program that takes into account each of those assets and needs. The school counselor and ELD teacher develop a program that matches the student’s preparation and ability, blending appropriate ELD classes, mainstream classes and electives.

Figure 2.2: Middle School Programs


Summary: The Immersion Program is a specialized process of teaching the English language to students whose first language is not English. The goal is for students to develop academic proficiency in English together with mastery of academic core content and multicultural proficiency. Instruction is nearly all in English. Primary language support is used for clarification and explanation when feasible.

This is a specially-designed mainstream program. The goal is for English language learners to develop academic proficiency in English together with mastery of academic core content and multicultural proficiency. Instruction is overwhelmingly in English. However, special support options are provided for ELLs as needed.

Students Served: All identified ELLs in any language

This program is recommended for ELLs at the Early Intermediate and Intermediate CELDT levels

This program is recommended for the reasonably fluent ELLs

ELLs who are “reasonably fluent” in English (an overall score on CELDT of 4, with no sub-score below level 3)

ELLs whose parents/guardians have refused participation in Structured English Immersion programs

Fluent English Proficient (FEP) and English-only students

Reclassified English Language Learners (RFEP) who are placed with ELLs in these classes receive regular mainstream instruction

Program Components: Daily English Language Development (ELD) that is leveled according to the students’ English proficiency level. Minimum one period daily.

Leveled ELD required to meet student’s needs based on the ELD levels.

Grade level content area classes (math, science, social science, etc.) delivered through specially designed academic instruction in English (SDAIE) methodology.

Math placement according to math skill level, not English proficiency level

Accelerated or advanced classes as appropriate

Daily English Language Development (ELD) to meet specific ELD needs of the student. This may be delivered in a grade-level language arts class, or a special class providing advanced ELD.

Grade-level content courses (math, science, social science, etc.) delivered in English, with differentiated instruction that includes special support, as needed, for ELLs.

Advanced classes as appropriate

Special Support Options: Specialized instruction by reading specialists


Summer school


Specialized instruction by reading specialists





Staffing Requirement:

(Required if an English Learner (ELL) is placed in the class)

Appropriate subject matter authorization. CLAD/CLAD or equivalent

Alternatives to CLAD/BCLAD

SB 395 or SB 1969

BCC or LDS Certificate

General teaching credential or supplementary ESL authorization only

Appropriate subject matter authorization. CLAD/BCLAD or equivalent required if an English Language Learner (ELL) is placed in the class

Alternatives to CLAD/BCLAD

SB 395 or SB 1969

BCC or LDS Certificate

General teaching credential or supplementary ESL authorization only

Different Groups of ELLs Need Different Services

English Language Learners at the secondary level have a variety of backgrounds and educational needs. Students present unique situations in terms of their grade levels, schooling histories, and varying literacy developments in the primary language and English. Appropriate student placement will need to consider language assessment results in English and the primary language, teacher evaluations and recommendations and the students’ length of time in school.

At the secondary level, there are four distinct groups of ELL students. These include: 1. Newly arrived English Language Learners with adequate formal schooling; 2. Newly arrived English Language Learners with limited formal schooling (under-schooled); 3. Long term English Language Learners (>6 years as ELL); and 4. ELLs who are meeting benchmarks and are making expected progress toward language and academic

goals.

1. Newly Arrived English Language Learners with Adequate Formal Schooling

These students may or may not have had some exposure to the formal study of English; however, they have had a formal educational program in their native country. Students are usually on grade level with respect to the expectations of the schools in their native country, and most have the content knowledge background that supports them in their content instruction in English. These students entering mid-program should be given credit for course work already completed in their native country. Individual student schedules will take into consideration, the potential need for year-long leveled English language development (ELD or Sheltered English), academic content classes taught through SDAIE, electives that are non-language dependent.

2. Newly Arrived English Language Learners with Inadequate Formal Schooling

Immigrant students with little or no prior schooling typically score at the beginning level of their reading and writing in their primary language, and have grade three or below skills in math. Many students come with interrupted schooling in their native country and face tremendous difficulties in completing an academic secondary program. These students need an instrucitonal program that will address their primary language literacy needs, and a flexible middle school program that will prepare them for high school curriculum. As with students with adequate formal schooling, individual student schedules will take into consideration, the potential need for year-long leveled English Language Development (ELD or Sheltered English), academic content classes taught through SDAIE, electives that are non-language dependent.


3. Long Term English Language Learners

Students considered long-term English Language Learners have more than six years with uninterrupted schooling in the United States. Students often have high oral fluency in English, and in some cases “reasonably fluent” proficiency (CELDT 4 & 5). But for a variety of reasons, they have not yet achieved the academic requirements to qualify for reclassification. In determining the program placement of long-term English Language Learners, it is important to first identify the students’ academic and linguistic needs and consider the following:

Student’s number of years enrolled in U.S. schools Quality and consistency of English Language Development instruction Consistency of student’s instructional program Overall student’s educational history

Consideration of these factors will help determine if the student’s performance is related to his/her English Language Development or other issues that affect the student’s academic performance.

Students will need all or some of the following:

English Language Development, either through a SDAIE English class or intervention class that addresses both language and literacy skills;

Sheltered or English mainstream instruction in the core subjects provided by an appropriately CLAD/BCLAD certified teacher

Counseling and monitoring to ensure that students are enrolled in classes that meet middle school requirements;

Intervention support (before or during the school day)

4. ELLs who Are Meeting Benchmarks

Students in middle school are placed at a given level of ELD prior to transitioning into more advanced, grade level English courses. This placement is based on initial assessment scores for new students, annual CELDT and Mastery (end of level) test performance, along with teacher recommendations and performance on the STAR California Standards Tests in English/Language Arts.

Considerations for All ELL Programs

English Language Learners are provided access to a well-articulated, standards-based core curriculum. In both Structured English Immersion and Mainstream English settings, the core instruction occurs in English, with use of Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE) strategies.

SDAIE – Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English

SDAIE is a methodology for maximizing students’ conprehension of English language instruction by use of special strategies and techniques. The basic features of SDAIE include:.

Contextualized instruction, a liberal use of non-verbal language, visual support materials, realia, graphic organizers, oral/verbal amplification, in order to provide students with a variety of resources in the environment that they can use to construct meaning;

Use of language modifications such as pause time, questioning, pacing, and highlighting; Task-based instruction, allowing students to work with concepts, and the language of those

concepts in a variety of ways (such as acting, drawing or mapping out the concepts, or using poetry, song, chants, letters and diaries, etc. to express and exemplify concepts.)

Language-sensitive and culture-sensitive content teaching; Use of accommodations in the learning environment in order to maximize the number of students

able to access the content; Encouraging students to actively use language; Frequent checking for understanding; Integrating assessment and instruction on an ongoing basis through observations, portfolios,

journals, and product development.


Commitment to Special Education Services: Primary and Secondary Programs

English Language Learners have access to Special Education services just as all other students in the Saratoga Union School District. Careful review by the Student Success Team (SST) of all referrals takes place first, which includes second language surveys, SST referral forms, modifications and intervention, review of student records, verification of current hearing and vision screening, parent interview as well as a student interview, if age appropriate. This review is required to determine if Special Educaiton assessment is needed and to determine if student performance is reflected of expected patterns of the student’s second language acquisiton based on schooling, and time in the country, and that growth is being made.

When it is determined that an ELL needs to be assessed, whether it be for speech, academic, or cognition evaluation, testing will be initiated upon the parent’s written approval. When appropriate, assessments will be conducted in the primary language of the students, or English, or both, making certain that cultural differences are taken into consideration when determining special education eligibility.

Instruction decisions related to student’s language acquisiton status must be described in the Individualized Education Plan (IEP). When a student qualifies for Special Education Services, linguistically and developmentally appropriate goals and objectives are written based on the student’s needs. The IEP will include goals that address English Language Developnent as well as goals that support access to the content areas through primary language support, if necessary. To the extent that the student’s English Language Development program relates to the student’s need for Special Education services, the IEP must document the provision of those services.

English Language Learners in grades K-8 with an IEP, continue receiving ELD and SDAIE instruction in conjunction and collaboration with the general education teachers until CELDT scores justify reclassification. Special Education staff, including Special Day Class staff, will receive the same training as general education staff in working with ELLs.

Through the Parental Waiver Request form, parents can select alternatives to the EL program for their student. The Pupil Services Department and the site will work together with the parent to ensure parental request and educational goals are met.

Gifted And Talented Education (GATE)

The Saratoga Union School District includes all students in its GATE program. All students are designated as GATE students and are granted access to all enrichment activities and dfferentiated instructional experiences.



Chapter THREE

Monitoring of Student Progress And Reclassification

3. Monitoring of Student Progress & Reclassification

Monitoring Student Progress

Student progress is monitored annually, based on district-adopted assessments. The assessments in use are shown in Figures 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6. These assessments are used to determine English language proficiency and evaluate students’ language growth and academic performance. Formative assessments to monitor students’ ELD progress are given throughout the school year in listening/speaking, reading and writing.

District Assessments

The assessments are equivalent to those used with English Only and Initial Fluent English Proficient students in the mainstream program. These include the state-mandated STAR tests (California Standards Tests), which are taken by all students in grades 2-8 regardless of their language classification. Some assessments are equivalent to those utilized in mainstream classrooms. English Language Learners take assessments, including the CELDT and if they are a Spanish speaking EL that has been in a U.S. school for one year or less, they will take the STS (Standards-based Tests in Spanish) in the spring along with the CST/CMA STAR tests.

Use of Assessment Data for Instructional Planning

Teachers use the language arts and mathematics curriculum-embedded assessments to review student progress every 6 to 8 weeks, planning modifications in instruction and classroom interventions as appropriate. CELDT data is used for instructional grouping in ELD at the elementary level, and placement in appropriate ELD courses at the middle school. Formative assessments in ELD are used by all teachers to identify areas of progress and of continuing need for all groups of data. CST/CMA (STAR) results are used in conjunction with diagnositc tests in the language arts and mathematics curricula to identify students in need of benchmark, strategic and intensive interventions and assign then to appropriate instructional schedules.

Annual Review of Student Progress

Annually, ELL specialists, counselors, and principals review the STAR test results, the latest CELDT scores, and other student assessment data, student grades, and teachers’ recommendations, for all ELL students (Annual Monitoring of ELL Student Progress form). On the basis of this review, the ELL specialist, teacher, and principal identify those students who are eligible for reclassification. The district’s criteria are shown in Figure 3.1. These criteria include multiple measures, including

English language proficiency, including listening, speaking, reading and writing

Academic achievement in reading and writing, assessed in English

Teacher evaluation

Teacher recommendations regarding any academic performance deficits

Parent’s opinion

The ELL specialist, teacher, and principal notify parents and guardians of their rights and encourage them to participate in the reclassification process, providing an opportunity for the parent or guardian to attend the Student Study Team (SST) meeting. If the parent/guardian wishes to attend, the meeting is scheduled at a time convenient for the parent/guardian. If not, the parent may state his/her opinion in writing. The school site should make every attempt to involve the parent/guardian in the Student Study Team through the avenues of letters, phone calls, and if possible, home visits.


Figure 3.1: Process for Monitoring of Student Progress and Reclassification

Step 2:


Step 3:

Sheltered English Immersion Placement

CELDT scores indicate beginning, early intermediate or intermediate

CELDT scores indicate intermediate with below grade level academic performance on STAR and local reading and writing assessment

Mainstream English Program

CELDT scores indicate intermediate or higher and appropriate grade level performance on STAR and local writing and reading assessment

Parent Notification

Mainstream English Program

(teacher does not need CLAD)

CELDT scores indicate early advanced, advanced and grade level performance on STAR and local writing and reading assessment

Step 1:Fall of each year

Annual review of academic performance from the previous year (STAR/MARS)

Review of preliminary CELDT scores

Review of local informal writing and reading assessment

Teacher input

Step 4:

Parent Notification

Review of student with both language and academic

concerns in ELD more than three years for SST

Parent Waiver Option Reclassification (R-FEP)

Monitor academic progress (see Figure3.3)

The Reclassification Process

The reclassification decision is made by a Student Study Team after considering the evidence regarding student’s performance and consulting with the parent. The membership of the Student Study Team includes: site ELL specialist, principal, classroom teacher, parents, and any other relevant specialists, including counselors. After the team has made a determination and recommendations regarding the student’s future program and support needs, the site administrator completes the district Reclassification Worksheet. They will also attach the Reclassification Parent Letter. Copies are given to the district office and to the parent, and a copy is placed in the student’s orange EL folder. The child is then coded as “reclassified” in the district SIS database. This enables district personnel to monitor all reclassified students as a group for ongoing success in all district programs.

Figure 3.2: Reclassification Criteria

Area Data Gathered Reclassification Criterion

English Language Proficiency Most recent CELDT test Overall Level: Advanced or Early Advanced

Listening: Intermediate or higher

Speaking: Intermediate or higher

Reading: Intermediate or higher

Writing: Intermediate or higher

Academic Achievement Most recent STAR California Standards Tests in English Language Arts (ELA)

Mid-Basic (Scale Score of 324 or higher) in ELA

Teacher Evaluation Teacher’s recommendation and current report card

Grades K-5:

Teacher agrees that student is performing successfully in all academic areas.

Report card indicates that student meets approaching standards in all areas.

Grades 6-8:

Minimum of “C” in all academic areas (Language Arts, math, social science, and science) on most current report card

If there are any deficits, the teacher agrees that:

The student is performing successfully in academic areas, OR

Any deficits in motivation or performance are unrelated to English language proficiency

Parent Opinion Description and results of consultation with parent

Parent agrees that reclassification is appropriate


Monitoring and Follow-Up on Reclassified Students

Site administrators monitor the progress of reclassified ELLs at the end of each grading period for two calendar years following a student’s reclassification. The Reclassification Follow-up form is used to summarize student performance on the critical measure, and the Language Review Team’s findings. Services that maybe provided include, but are not liited to:

Specialized academic assessment

English Language Development instruction

Re-entry into a Sheltered English Immersion program

Participation in benchmark, strategic or intensive interventions provided by the school

Figure 3.3: Process for Follow-Up Monitoring of Student Progress After Reclassification (RFEP)

Step 1 Review of Student Progress

Fall & Spring reviews for 2 years after reclassification

ELL Specialist, Teacher and Principal review

Formative assessment results

other classroom performance

Catch-Up Plan for RFEPs

Complete the Reclassification Follow-Up form

Notify parents

Provide appropriate interventions

Document meeting, findings and action to be taken on the Reclassification Follow-Up Accountability Roster (SST)

No additional modification required

ON GRADE LEVEL

English Language Arts is “Proficient” or “Advanced”

BELOW GRADE LEVEL

English Language Arts is “Below Basic” or “Far Below

Basic” or other academic deficiencies

Document meeting and results on the Reclassification Follow-Up Accountability Roster


Initial Fluent English Proficient Students

According to the CDE definition, students who score at least at the early advanced proficiency level overall without any skill area below the intermediate proficiency level should be identified as initial fluent English proficient (IFEP). IFEPs who incur any academic deficits may be monitored through the Student Study Team model to plan intervention and oversee academic progress.


Assessments Given to English Language Learners

All Saratoga Union School District schools will use standard assessments and procedures to gather information on language acquisition and academic progress for ELLs. The following tables detail the instruments, grade levels, and descriptions of student assessments for English and the primary language fluency. Included are timelines, and information on the person(s) responsible for administering these assessments.

Figure 3.4: English Language Development Assessments

Assessment Instrument

Grade Level Description When Administered Who Administers

California English Language Development Test (CELDT)

K-8 Assesses listening, speaking, reading & writing in English

State mandated instrument

Used to measure Adequate Yearly Progress for NCLB Title III

Initially: At registration (Legal allowance – within 30 calendar days from date of enrollment)

Annually: July-Sept

Initial: Trained staff person at school site

Annual: Trained staff person at school site

Curriculum embedded ELD profiles and assessments

K-8 To be developed

Figure 3.5: Primary Language Development Assessments



Standards-based Tests in Spanish (STS)

2-8 Criterion referenced tests in Spanish assessing student’s mastery of grade level standards in English Language Arts, Mathematics, Science and Social Studies

Must be administered to Spanish speaking ELLs who have been in a U.S. school for less than 12 mos.

Annually in Spring Teacher or trained staff


Figure 3.6: Academic Achievement: Assessments in English



California Standards Tests (STAR)

2 – 8 Criterion referenced tests assessing student’s mastery of grade level standards in English Language Arts, Mathematics, Science and Social Studies

State mandated instruments

Used to measure Adequate Yearly Progress for federal No Child Left Behind accountability

Included in the Academic Performance Index

Annually in Spring

Teacher

California Writing Test

4 & 7 Rubric-scored test of writing applications

Included in ELA CST results for 4th and 7th grade

Annually in Spring

Teacher

California Modified Assessment (CMA)

3 – 8

(as of 08/09)

Criterion referenced tests for students with an individualized education program plan.

Tests assess student’s mastery of grade level standards in the areas of English Language Arts, Math and Science, and Social Studies

Annually in Spring Teacher

CA Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA)

2-8 Criterion reference tests for students with significant cognitive disabilities

Tests assess student’s knowledge in the areas of English Language Arts, Math and Science

Annually in Spring Teacher

Houghton Mifflin English Language Arts Assessments

K-6 Curriculum-embedded Reading/Language Arts assessments contained in the Houghton Mifflin English Language Arts series

Periodically

Throughout the year

Teacher

Local Writing Assessment

K-8 Fall & Spring Teacher

MAC/MARS 3-8 Balanced Assessment Test in Mathematics

Spring Teacher



Chapter FOUR

Staffing and Professional Growth

4. Staffing & Professional Growth

Staff Configuration

The district ensures that all teaching personnel whose assignment incudes English Language Learner students will hold appropriate certification to provide necessary instructional services to English Language Learners. An elementary or secondary teacher assigned to provide ELD or SDAIE or to oversee the program of direct service must be properly authorized or “actively pursuing” authorization.

Whenever open teaching positions require CLAD certification, the district actively recruits and hires teachers who are fully certified to fill such positions. If full credentialed candidates holding the BCLAD/CLAD are not available, teachers in training for the BCLAD/CLAD can fill the positions as long as they complete all requirements within the required time specifications: 3 years for CLAD and 5 years for BCLAD. Each spring, during the preparation for submission of the Annual Language Census (R-30) Report, teachers will also report on the progress in fulfilling CLAD requirements. All submitted information is tracked and monitored by the Human Resources Department and the Assistant Superintendent of Curriculm and Instruction.

Figure 4.1: Required Teacher Authorization

Type of Instruction Proper Authorization

English Language Development (ELD)

Multiple or Single Subject Teaching Credential with CLAD/BCLAD Emphasis

CLAD/BCLAD

BCC, LDS

General teaching credential (ELD only)

Supplementary Authorization in ESL (ELD only)

University or District Internship Credential with CLAD emphasis

SB 395 or SB 1969

Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE)

Multiple or Single Subject Teaching Credential with CLAD/BCLAD Emphasis

CLAD/BCLAD

BCC, LDS

Supplementary Authorization in ESL (ELD only)

University or District Internship Credential with CLAD emphasis

SB 395 or SB 1969

Primary Language Multiple or Single Subject Teaching Credential with CLAD/BCLAD Emphasis

BCLAD

BCC

University or District Internship Credential with BCLAD emphasis


Recruitment Procedures: Paraeducators

The need for para-educator positions is determined in the same way as described for teachers. Positions are advertised and filled internally before beginning external recruitment.

District and Site Training

The district professional development plan includes training for all staff who work with ELLs, including administrators, para-educators, counselors, teachers, district office personnel, and office personnel. Training will address:

ELL Master Plan policies, procedures, and guidelines

ELL program design and options

ELD and SDAIE instruction

Parent outreach to ensure their informed consent, understanding of, and participation in the program options for their child

In addition to district-sponsored professional development, teachers new to the profession participate in the Silicon Valley New Teacher Project Induction Program. Additionally, all teachers and school personnel benefit from the partnership established with neighboring districts and the Santa Clara County Office of Education.



Chapter FIVE

Parent and

Community Involvement

5. Parent and Community Involvement

Procedures for Parent Notification about Parent Exception Waivers

1. After enrolling and completing all required assessments, parents of all students with a language other than English on questions 1, 2, or 3 on the Home Language Survey are given the Preliminary Program Placement form. The form reports the results of the initial assessment and the options for program placement based on these results.

Once the CELDT results have been received from the test publisher, the parent is notified in writing via the Initial CELDT Results Parent Notification Form. This written notification is in English and in the student’s primary language (if possible).

2. The parental exception waiver process is explained to parents and they receive an orientation to the district’s program options for English Language Learners. The Parental Exemption Waiver must be obtained and signed at the school site. Parents interested in completing the waiver meet with the principal or designee to review the program options and to sign the waiver. Parents are also provided with a written explanation of the program options and are informed of the legal requirments that must be adhered to in placing students and in granting parental exception waivers, including:

Prior to their first year of placement, every English Language Learner under 10 years of age who is enrolling in a California school for the first time must be initially placed in a program taught overwhelmingly in English for not less than 30 calendar days.

The waiver requires the principal’s approval

A parent applying for a waiver may request that the State Board of Education review the district’s guidelines or procedures

All parental exception waivers are implemented within 20 instructional days of submission to the school principal, except for the waiver requests for students under 10 years of age. These may not be acted upon before the end of the 30-day calendar placement in which instruction is overwhelmingly in a English language program.

3. School personnel provide program placement recommendations, based on assessments and parent preference.

4. If the waiver is completed, copies are distributed to:

The orange ELL folder in the child’s cumulative file

The parent

The district office

Once a student has been enrolled in a program, he/she should not be moved to another program without review and action by a Student Study Team and informed parental consent demonstrated by parent’s presence at the Student StudyTeam and the parent’s signature on the Program Placement form.

5. Each parent is advised yearly about the district’s placement options for English Language Learners and the opportunity to apply for a Parental Exception Waiver. This notification includes instructions for parents who wish to apply. Each spring, after the annual SST, the parent is informed of the child’s CELDT results. At this time, the parent reviews the official CELDT (Initial or Annual) results, noting program options and the district’s recommendation for placement for the coming year.

The child’s placement is an outcome of the SST meeting. The site administrator works with the ELL teacher to conduct the annual program placement presentation for the school’s parents/guardians. This is conducted in the spring (no earlier than 30 calendar days after the start of the shool year for Kindergarten families). Parent consent is necessary for changes in program placement.


Procedures for Approval/Denial of Parental Exception Waivers

During the conference conducted by the principal or designee at the newly enrolled student’s school site:

Parent Exception Waivers are available to parents of all English Language Learners

Parents interested in completing the waiver process will meet with the principal or designee per Sections 305, 206, 310 and 311 of the Californa Education Code

English only instruction may be waived by parent request

All approved and denied waivers will be sent to the Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services. The district office will issue an annual report of the number of granted and denied waivers.

Any parent who applies for a waiver can request that the State Board of Education review the district’s guidelines or procedures.

The waiver requries the principal’s approval

Each application for a waiver will be considered on its individual merits.

Approval of a Parental Exception Waiver occurs unless the school principal and educational staff determine denial would better suit the overall educational development of the student.

Any explanation, in writing, will be provided to the parent with the reason(s) for the denial of a waiver request and the district’s appeal procedures. If the parent wishes to appeal the denial,she/he may use the district grievance process.

Section 311 of the California Education Code describes the three circumstances in which a Parental Exception Waiver maybe granted:

1. Children who already know English

The child already possesses good English language skills as measured by vocabulary, comprehension, reading, and writing STAR tests, in which the child scores at or above the state average for his/her grade level or at or above the 5th grade average, whichever, is lower.

2. Older children

The child is age 10 or older, and it is the informed belief of the school principal and educational staff that an alternate course of educational study would be better suited to the child’s rapid aquisition of basic English language skills.

3. Children with special needs (children less than 10 years old)

The child already has been placed for a period of not less than thirty calendar days in an English language classrooom. It is subsequently the informed belief of the school principal and educational staff that the child has such special physical, emotional, psychological, or educational needs that an alternate course of educational study would be better suited to the child’s overall educational development. The parents shall be fully informed of the right to refuse a waiver.

Parent Advisory Committees

Each school with twenty-one (21) or more English Language Learners must establish a functioning English Language Learner Advisory Committee (ELAC).

English Learner Advisory Committee (ELAC) Requirements

Members are chosen by election. All parents/guardians of English Language Learners have an opportunity to vote. If committee vacancies exist after an election, the principal may appoint members to serve who represent the target population.

Members receive materials and training related to carrying out their legal responsibilities.

The ELAC advises the principal and staff on topics related to English Language Learners, including:

o Development of a Single Plan for Student Achievement as it relates to English Learners and the school’s needs assessment;

o Review of the Annual Language census in the spring (R-30);



o Reinforcing parent awareness of the importance of regular school attendance.

Members elect representatives to the District English Language Learner Advisory Committee.

The site principal and the Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services, annually review the implementation of the ELAC in order to ensure that all requirements are met. All site ELAC documentation (calendar of ELAC dates, agendas, and minutes) must be kept at the school site, and a copy of all documentation is sent to the district office.

Implementation of the Site ELAC

The principal is responsible for establishing the ELAC. The principal or a designee coordinates meetings and communication/documentation between the site and the district office. Elected officers conduct the meetings.

Elections for ELAC members are conducted at the school site by October 1st of each year. Membership composition must reflect the percentage of English Language Learners in the school. Membership includes parents and school staff (fewer than the number of parents). If a member must be replaced during the year, the replacement serves for the remainder of the year. At the beginning of the following year, an election must be held to fill the position.

ELAC Roles and Resposibilities

Training will be provided by the district office on the establishment of ELAC to site administrators/site personnel in early September.

The principal assists with planning the ELAC meetings, attends the meetings.

The principal arranges an agenda planning session with the ELAC chairperson prior to each meeting.

Meeting dates are determined and publicized in English and other languages in advance.

The ELAC conducts formal and advisory meetings, with agendas and minutes.

During the school year, the ELAC members receive training in the four aforementioned areas.

In the fall, the ELAC elects one member to the Superintendent’s Advisory Committee (SAC) to represent the ELLs at a site.

District English Learner Advisory Committee (DELAC) Requirements:

The DELAC advises the governing board on the following:

A timetable for and development of a district Master Plan for English Language Learners, taking into consideration the school site plans for English Language Learners.

A district-wide needs assessment on a school-by-school basis.

The district program, goals, and objectives for programs and services for English Language Learners.

The plan to ensure compliance with applicable teacher or aide requirements.

Review of the language census

District reclassification procedures.

Other DELAC implementation provisions include:

Meeting at least twice a year.

The DELAC operates according to guidelines contained in its by-laws.

The Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services serves as district liaison to the DELAC. This person assists with agenda preparation, meeting notices, arrangements for meetings, preparation of minutes, and all communications pertaining to the DELAC.

The DELAC will communicate their ongoing advice to the Superintendent and governing board via the Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services. Once a year a report will be presented to the Superintendent and the governing board.

The DELAC chairperson presides at meetings and signs all communications.

The district provides all DELAC members with appropriate training, materials and information needed to carry out their responsibilities and duties.


Chapter SIX

Evaluation and

Accountability

6. Evaluation & Accountability

Accountability is a shared responsibility. Students, parents and all personnel at the school and district have a role. Evaluation is not just an annual assessment, but it is on-going and informs instruction and program development.

Infrastructure: A key element in ELL accountability

The ELL program advisory groups include the Superintendent’s Advisory Council (SAC) which is made up of district stakeholders, and the School Site Councils. School sites with twenty-one (21) or more ELLs identified on the R-30 have an ELAC (English Language Acquisition Committee). One member of the ELAC sub-committee serves on the Superintendent’s Advisory Committee. Individually and through coordination, these groups serve as a clearinghouse for strategies, ideas, and suggestions for ELL programs; evaluate and determine that practices, resources, and personnel are being used effectively to implement the district’s program for English Language Learners; and ensure communication and integration throughout the district.

Evaluation Goals

1. Implementation

ELL programs are fully implemented as described in this plan.

2. English Proficiency

ELLs will make steady progress in developing academic English, and attain academic English language proficiency as efficiently and effectively as possible.*

3. Academic Progress

ELLs will make steady progress in core academic subjects.

ELLs in the district 5 years or longer will meet grade-level standards in core academic subjects.

4. Decrease Risk of Failure

Rates for ELLs and RFEPs in categories indicating risk for school failure are no greater than those for English Only students

5. Parent Engagement

Parents of ELLs and RFEPs participate meaningfully in their children’s education.

6. Multicultural Proficiency

ELLs will develop multicultural proficiency.

*Note: As measured by Annual CELDT, the state criteria for AMOA1 (progress in learning English) are: for students at Levels 1-3 overall, gain one level per year; for student at level 4 and 5 overall, bring subskill scores to level 3 or higher (i.e., English proficient level per State Board of Education guidelines): for students at the English proficient level, maintain that level until reclassified. The state criteria AMAO1 (attaining English language proficiency) on the CELDT are: attain the English proficient level (overall level 4 or 5 with all subskills 3 or higher) after four years or if at the intermediate level or above. Targets for each AMAO steadily increase.


Figure 6.1: Evaluation Goals and Questions

Goal Evaluation Questions

1. Implementation

ELL programs are fully implemented as described in this plan.

1.1

1.2

Are ELL programs fully and consistently implemented in ways that meet or exceed requirements of state and federal law?

To what extent is the Master Plan for English Language Learners useful to teachers, administrators, and parents as a tool to meet the needs of ELLs and staff?

2. English Proficiency

ELLs will make steady progress in developing academic English, and attain academic English language proficiency as efficiently and effectively as possible.

2.1

2.2

2.3

Do ELLs meet the state’s Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objective 1 with regard to progress in learning English?

Do ELLs meet the state’s Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objective 2 with regard to attaining English Language proficiency?

Are there overall proficiency gains on all sub tests on the CELDT for students 1-3 years in U.S. schools? Are there overall proficiency gains on all sub tests on the CELDT for students 4-5 years in U.S. schools? Are there overall proficiency gains on all sub tests on the CEDLT for students more than 5 years in U.S. schools? What are the overall gains in the cohort groups?

3. Academic Progress

a. ELLs will make steady progress in core academic subjects

b. ELLs in our district 5 years or longer will meet grade-level standards in core academic subjects

3.1

3.2

3.3

3.4

3.4

3.5

3.6

Are increasing percentages of ELLs making steady academic progress on CST-ELA?

Are increasing percentages of ELLs making steady academic progress on CST-Math?

Are ELLs not making steady academic progress being identified and appropriately served?

Are increasing percentages of ELLs in our district 5 years or longer meeting all criteria required for reclassification?

Do ELLs (and RFEPs) meet the state’s Title I Adequate yearly Progress target in English Language Arts?

Do ELLs (and RFEPs) meet the state’s Title I Adequate Yearly Progress target in mathematics?

Is there an annual increase in the percentage of ELLs (and RFEPs) for each of the success factors in 3.3 and 3.4?

4. Decrease Risk of Failure

Rates for ELLs and RFEPs in categories indicating risk for school failure are no greater than those EOs.

4.1

4.2

Are ELLs (and RFEPs) not overrepresented in the following categories: Suspensions, expulsions, other discipline Retentions in grades K-5 Dropouts

Is there an annual decrease in the percentage of ELLs and RFEPs for each of the risk factors defined in 4.1?

5. Parent Engagement

Parents of ELLs and RFEPs participate meaningfully in their children’s education

5.1

5.2

Are parents of ELLs and RFEPs as likely as parents of EOs to participate in school activities (parent-teacher conferences, volunteer in class, etc.)?

Is the rate of parent engagement increasing?

6. Multicultural Proficiency

ELLs will develop multicultural proficiency.

6.1

6.2

6.3

Are school sites implementing the Equity Action plan by reviewing data in terms of: ELL sub group, RFEP, and other subgroups?

Are school staff taking part in culturally relevant pedagogy?

Student benchmarks and procedures will be developed .

* As measured by Annual CELDT, the state criteria for AMAO1 (progress in learning English) are: For students at Levels 1-3 overall, gain one level per year; for students at Level 4 or 5 overall, bring all subskill scores to Level 3 or higher (i.e., English proficient level per State Board of Education guidelines); for students at the English proficient level, maintain that level until reclassified. The state criteria for AMAO2 (attaining English-language proficiency) on the CELDT are: attain the English proficient level (overall level 4 or 5 with all subskills 3 or higher) after four years or if at the intermediate level or above. Targets for each AMAO steadily increase.


Evaluation Design

The district will conduct an annual evaluation of programs and services for English langauge Learners structured around the six goals. The evaluation activities will focus on analysis of student performance on the CELDT, STAR/CST and other student work; compliance with the Master Plan for English Language Learners; alignment of instructional materials and strategies with standards; data collection related to attendance and discipline; and percentage of participating parents in school functions.

Evaluating Program Effectiveness

The district has identified benchmarks for the Structured English Immersion Program and the mainstream Program. (see Figure 6.2) The chart illustrates the expectations for the level of achievement that students should attain as they progress through the system. The benchmarks are built around two main parameters:

The student’s CELDT level

The number of years in the program (for CELDT)

Figure 6.2: Expected Benchmarks for Structured English Immersion and Mainstream Programs

Beginning Early Intermediate

Intermediate Early Advanced

Advanced Reclassification

CELDT OVERALL SCORE

1 2 3 4 5 4 or 5

Timeline toward Reclassification based on CELDT Overall score at time of Initial enrollment year*

1st year*

2nd year

1st year

3rd year

2nd year

1st year

4th year

3rd year

2nd year

1st year

5th year

4th year

3rd year

2nd year

1st year

4th year

3rd year

2nd year

STS Test**

Reading & Math 50th Percentile or above

STAR California Standards Test (CST)

English Language Arts

Far Below Basic

Below Basic Basic Mid Basic Proficient Mid Basic

STAR California Standards Test (CST)

Math

Far Below Basic

Below Basic Basic Mid Basic Proficient Mid Basic

*1st year refers to the first time a student took the test. (Initial Assessment (IN) thereafter students are tested annually).

**Required for EL (Spanish) students who have been in the United States 12 months or less


Monitoring Program Implementation and Effectiveness

Goal 1: Program Implementation as Described in the Master Plan for English Language Learners

District and site staff will periodically monitor implementation of all ELL programs. The primary goal of the monitoring is to ensure that every school in the district has optimally effective and compliant programs for ELLs. This monitoring will consist of three major aspects:

1. Document reviews. All schools will conduct annual monitoring by means of review of key files and documents. The reviews will be scheduled by the first week of school.

2. In depth reviews. District facilitated self-reviews will be conducted on a four-year cycle. The reviews will include a documentation check, teacher and parent interviews, and visits to selected classrooms. They will be conducted by teams to include EL staff and administrators. These in-depth reviews will result in status reports that will provide the basis for individual site improvement work and for any required Consolidated Programs Monitoring reports to the California Department of Education. The Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services will also assist with the document reviews and have lead responsibility for organizing in-depth reviews and any needed follow-up.

3. On-going coaching and staff development support. The Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services will help organize staff development and assist with classroom coaching.

The monitoring process (1) establishes high expectations for all students and provides a framework for ensuring that student and organizational outcomes are achieved; (2) promotes full involvement of all stakeholders (adminstrators, teachers, parents, and students, when applicable) in all phases of planning, implementation, and evaluation activities; provides for high levels of coordination between the site improvement efforts and ensures that program evaluation is an integral part of school improvement initiatives and activities.

Principals are responsible for the daily, site-level implementation of the Master Plan for English Language Learners. Throughout the academic year, principals complete sections of the ELL checklist, which is submitted annually to the Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services for review.

Goal 2: Steady progress toward and attainment of academic English language proficiency

Students are expected to gain one language proficiency level annually until they reach the English proficient level and then maintain that level until reclassified.

Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives, AMAO1 defines progress as follows:

Students at Beginning, Early Intermediate, and Intermediate overall levels are expected to gain one level each year.

Students at Early Advanced or Advanced levels are expected to bring all sub-skills up to Intermediate level.

Students at the English Proficient level are expected to maintain that level (overall and sub-skills).

Academic ELD progress will be supported and indicated during the year by analysis of student work and assessment of performance related to content standards.

ELLs expected to reach the English Proficient level (AMAO2) include the following (based on prior year CELDT scores):

Early Advanced and Advanced students who were not English proficient the prior year

Beginning the Early Intermediate students who are in U.S. schools for more than 4 years

Credit is given for Beginning and Early Intermediate students in U.S. schools less than 4 years who reach English proficiency

The CELDT is administered annually according to the state calendar. Results are analyzed between February and April.

An analysis of ELD progress (AMAO1) and English language proficiency attainment (AMAO2) will be conducted by district, school, language group, and program. District level analyses will assist in identifying professional development priorities.


Goal 3: Steady academic progress toward and attainment of grade-level academic proficiency

Students will make steady progress toward meeting grade-level standards in core academic subjects, as measured by the California Standards Test (CST-ELA and CST-Math)) as follows:

Students in “Far Below Basic” will progress in one year to “Below Basic”

Student at :Below Basic” will progress in one year to “Basic”

Students at “Basic” will progress within two years to “Proficient”

No student will drop in academic performance in progressing toward or maintaining “Proficient”

Academic progress will be supported and indicated during the year by:

District and site standards-based goals and benchmarks

CST performance data in English/Language Arts and mathematics will be analyzed each fall. District summary reports will be prepared. In addition, school-level reports identifying students who have not made progress, along with such relevant additional data as time-in-district, and CELDT overall as well as sub-skill levels, will be prepared for each school site.

Analysis of relative strengths and weaknesses as measured on the CST will indicate priority areas for professional development.

Reclassification data are collected throughout the spring semester. District staff will review and analyze performance on criteria needs for reclassification for all ELLs.

Goal 4: Indicators of Risk for School Failure

Annually, school site and district personnel will compile the data on attendance, suspensions, expulsions, and other disciplinary actions as well as retentions.

Goal 5: Parent Engagement

In addition to ELAC documents, schools will collect data related to ELL parent involvement in school activities.

Goal 6: Multicultural Proficiency

District and school sites will compile data related to school programs and activities that encourage multicultural proficiency. Documents related to professional develoment activities that reinforce this goal will also be maintained and reviewed.

Using Program Effectiveness Information to Improve Implementation and Modify the Program

The data gathered and the analyses performed contribute to an evaluation of program implementation and outcomes, both at the district and site levels. All told, they assist sites to determine strengths and areas for improvement in their programs. Adjustments can be made accordingly. The data and tools can assist administrators, individual teachers and grade level teams. Through collaboration, sites develop action plans for professional development that establishes needs, long-term goals and types of training experiences that are needed to improve instruction and influence student outcomes.

At the district level, the annual analyses of student outcomes will determine the level of effectiveness of ELL programs, providing the foundation for professional development planning and program improvement each year.


Evaluation and Accountability: Roles and Responsibilities

Student:

Attends school daily

Strives for high achievement

Participates in school activities

Communicates regularly with parents, teachers, and support staff

Parent

Monitors/promotes ELLs progress in academics, homework, attendance, and behavior

Supports ELL in activities to promote student achievement

Communicates regularly regarding student progress with students’ teachers and school

Attends parent conferences and school functions

Participates in school committees

Teacher

Implements specific ELL programs as described in Master Plan for English Language Learners and provides instruction that meets state frameworks and district and state standards

Ensures delivery of appropriate English Language Development (ELD) instruction

Monitors ELLs’ progress. Reviews school/classroom data. Uses data to modify instruction. Reviews content and ELD standards and assessment procedures.

Determines/implements differentiated strategies for English Language Learners and RFEP students.

Advocates for support services for students not meeting standards and benchmarks, or who require interventions in order to reach goals.

Attends Student Study Team meetings and informs parent of progress and strategies to support students in meeting standards.

Counselor (Middle School)

Assists with initial placements, using the Master Plan for English Language Learners as a guide

Monitors progress of ELLs toward meeting language, academic and multicultural benchmarks

Assists with interpretation of student assessments, and collaborates with teachers, the site ELL specialist and others in devising individual program modifications and interventions, as needed.

Supports the implementation of the Master Plan for English Language Learners

Paraeducator

Provides support in the core subjects

Assists with student testing

Supports the implementation of the Master Plan for English Language Learners

Serves as a resource for the Student Study Team

Informs staff of progress of identified students toward reclassification

School Site Council with ELAC Sub-Committee

Examines program evaluation findings on an annual basis and frames recommendations for the program improvement for the following year as part of its advisory role

Reviews the Annual Language Census (R-30) report in the spring

Site Administrator



Monitors all aspects of staffing and instruction for ELL programs, according to the Master Plan for English Language Learners

Develops work plan for, supervises, and works closely with ELL specialist

Responsible for all procedures and legal requirements pertaining to ELLs at the school

Monitors placement of English Language Learners and oversees reclassification process

Reports periodically to district administrators on implementation of ELL programs

Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services

Supports sites in implementing Master Plan for English Language Learners; monitors implementation of Master Plan for English Language Learners, including evaluating and monitoring plan; reviews district and site ELL data

Monitors the selection of materials used in the classroom for delivery of ELD and core curriculum to English Language Learners

Meets with principals to review site plans for English Language Learners

Monitors compliance and ELL procedures at the site and district level

Provides on-going training for administrators, teachers and paraeducators

Prepares annual ELL evaluation report

Monitors grants and evaluations for ELLs

Evaluates district goals relative to implementation of the Master Plan for English Language Learners, student achievement, professional development, and evaluation and accountability

Participates in SAC

Oversees compliance procedures and supports relative to ELL programs

Oversees data collection, provides analysis, writes reports, and prepares charts

Evaluates district and school site data

Shares results of evaluation with all stakeholders, including SAC

Monitors the accuracy of the ELLs’ data in the district computer system

Superintendent’s Adisory Council (SAC)

Meets at least quarterly

Periodically reviews English Language Learner programs and issues

Serves as a clearinghouse for strategies, ideas, and suggestions for ELL programs as well as a focus group for collaborative problem-solving

Provides a forum to evaluate and determine that practices, resources, and personnel are being used effectively to implement the district’s program for ELLs

Shares results of evaluation with all stakeholders, including SAC


Chapter SEVEN

Funding and

Resources

7. Funding & Resources

Funds are allocated following the funding mandates prescribed by the Education Code, state regulations and district policies. EIA and other categorical funds are used to supplement the core educational program and not to supplant general fund monies. The core program is supported by the general fund. Expenditures are audited annually by the district’s Business Office and by external auditors.

The following process is used to develop plans for program operations and improvement, and the consequent allocation of funds. The governing board approves annual goals which are translated into the budget according to prioritized needs, data analysis, and available funds and resources. The district ensures compliance with the district goals and the Consolidated Application. In turn, the site administrators coordinate development of the school level plan based on prioritization of needs, analaysis of data and input from the School Site Council and ELAC group.

Site and district advisory committees assume the following roles:

The School Site Council provides input regarding development, revision, and approval of the Single Plan for Student Achievement.

ELAC members advise and give input on the school level plan and budget.

SAC gives input on the district level plan.

General Fund Resources

The district uses the General Fund to provide the base program for all students. This includes core curricular materials, instructional supplies, teachers’ salaries and other district services as well as support systems for monitoring program implementation and student progress, and for program evaluation. Core materials in Language Arts and mathematics provide universal access supplements to help ensure that ELLs have access to the core curriculum. The base program also includes District adopted ELD program materials.

EIA Funds

EIA (Economic Impact Aid) funds are used to supplement the base program. They are integrated with other supplemental funding sources. These funds are used for supplemental services such as:

Employment of paraeducators

Purchase of supplemental teaching materials

In-service training for teachers and paraeducators to develop instructional skills

Support for parent involvement activities

Parent training

Translation services

Other reasonable expenses related to the program for ELLs

Services provided through EIA funds are designed to ensure that ELLs develop full proficiency in English as rapidly and effectively as possible, and to ensure that they recoup any academic deficits that may have developed in other areas of the core curriculum as a result of language barriers. Each site receives an annual entitlement of EIA funds, based on the number of identified English Language Learners.


Other Supplemental Funds

Title I, Part A: Targeted Assistance programs under Title I, Part A permit a school to use funds from Title I to raise achievement for disadvantaged students, using research-based approaches, with attention to increasing the amount and quality of learning.

GATE: The Saratoga Union School District includes all students n its GATE program. All students are designated as GATE students and are granted access to all enrichment activities and differentiated instuctional experiences.

Community Support: Programs that support the core curriculum, and enrichment are sponsored by the Saratoga Educational Foundation, Los Gatos-Saratoga Community Education & Recreation Department, and the school site Parent Teacher Associations. These programs offer student academic and enrichment programs, and childcare.



APPENDIX

Glossary, District Policy and Forms


Legal References and Glossary Legal References

The complete list of State and Federal regulations or other legal mandates governing the program may not be included within this document. Applicable legal citations for this program include, but are limited to the following:

Federal Law

20 USC 1703; (F); 42 USC 2000(d); 34 CFR 100.1-100.13, 300.300, 300.343(d), 300-346(a), 300.532(a)(c), 300.552; Castaneda v. Pickard (5th Cir. 1981) 648 F.2d 989, 1009-1013; Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education (7th Cir. 1987) 811 F.2d 1030, 1041-1042.

State Law

EC 305-306, 310-311, 313, 33051(a)(3), 44253, 44253.1, 44253.2, 44253.3, 44253.10, 48985, 54032, 60810-60811, 62002, 62002.5; former EC 52161, 52164.1, 52164.6, 52168, 52176; 5 CCR 3942(3), 4304-4306, 4312, 4320, 11300-11305; 83 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. (2000) 40.


Glossary of Terms

AMAOs: Annual Measurable Achievement Objective

API: Academic Progress Index

AR: Administrative Regulations

AYP: Academic Yearly Progress

BP: Board Policy

BTSA: Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment. The purpose of BTSA as set forth in the California Ed Code, Section 44279.2 (b) is to … “provide an effective transition into the teaching career for first-year and second-year teachers in California and improve the educational performance of pupils through improved training and assistance for new teachers”.

CAPA: California Alternate Performance Assessment

CDE: California Department of Education

CELDT: California English Language Development Test

CMA: California Modified Assessment

CPM: Categorical Program Monitoring. A modification of the process previously known as the CCR (Coordinated Compliance Review). It includes the development of new instruments and a guide.

Cross Cultural, Language and Academic Development (CLAD): Authorizes the holder to provide the ELL student with English Language Development and Specially Designed Academic Instruction Delivered in English (SDAIE).

CST: California Standards Test

DELAC: (see SAC)

EIA/LEP: Economic Impact Aide / Limited English Proficient

EL: English Learner. Also known as LEP (Limited English Proficient). Used in many state documents. Equivalent to ELL

ELL: English Language Learner. Also known as LEP (Limited English Proficient)

ELA: English Language Arts

ELAC/SSC: English Learner Advisory Committee/School Site Council. A committee that advises the principal and school staff on programs and services for English Learners. ELAC is required for schools that have 21 or more EL students. At sites that have less than 21 students, the SSC provides this function.

ELAP: English Learner Acquisition Program

ELD: English Language Development. A broad term encompassing all aspects of English language development for English Language Learners. It includes speaking and listening as well as reading and writing at developmentally appropriate language levels. The ELD component is based on the California Language Development standards and provides a pathway to the English Language Arts (ELA) Standards.

ELD Content: Secondary courses such as math and science taught using SDAIE (Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English) techniques.

EO: English only student

ESL: English as a Second Language

FEP: Fluent English Proficient

GATE: Gifted and Talented Education

HLS: Home Language Survey


IEP: Individualized Educational Plan

IFEP: Initially Fluent English Proficient

LAS: Language Assessment Scales

LEA: Local Education Agency

LEP: Limited English Proficient

Mainstream English Program: The goal for English Language Learners in the mainstream program is to develop academic proficiency in English. Instruction is overwhelmingly in English. However, special support options are provided for ELLs as needed.

Orange EL Folder: A folder which contains all relevant information regarding the language and academic progress of ELLs

Principals Assurance Checklist: Calendar dates for procedures and documents that are periodically turned into the district.

R-30: Annual language census report due March 1 every year

Reclassification: When a student has met all district criteria, he/she is reclassified from ELL to Fluent English Proficient (FEP) student.

RFEP: Reclassified Fluent English Proficient

Superintendent’s Advisory Council (SAC)/DELAC: District committee that serves as DELAC

SSC: School Site Council

SDAIE: Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English. A methodology used by teachers who possess the competency to make academic content comprehensible to ELL students.

SIP: School Improvement Program

SOLOM: Student Oral Language Observation Matrix. Informal assessment of oral language, reading and writing

SST: Student Success Team

Structured English Immersion Program: A specialized process of teaching the English language to students whose first language is not English. The goal is for students to develop academic proficiency in English. Instruction is nearly all in English. Primary language support is used for clarification and explanation when available.

Title I: A federal program that provides supplementary funds to help improve instruction in high poverty schools to ensure all students meet state academic standards. Note: All uses of Title I funds must be based on scientifically-based research and data that verify actions resulting in increased student achievement.

Transferability of Skills: Instruction within a program where transferable skills are directly taught so that students make the connection between their primary language and English.


Saratoga Union School District Policy

Instruction BP 6174(a)

EDUCATION FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

The Governing Board intends to provide English language learners with challenging curriculum and instruction that develop proficiency in English as rapidly and effectively as possible in order to assist students in accessing the full educational program and achieving the district’s academic standards. The district’s program shall be based on sound instructional theory and shall be adequately supported so that English language learners can achieve results at the same academic level as their English-proficient peers in the regular course of study.

The Board encourages staff to exchange information with staff in other districts and the county office of education about programs, options and strategies for English language learners that succeed under various demographic conditions.

(cf. 4112.22 – Staff Teaching Students of Limited English Proficiency)

The Superintendent or designee shall maintain procedures which provide for the identification, assessment and placement of English language learners and for their redesignation based on criteria adopted by the Board and specified in administrative regulations.

To evaluate program effectiveness, the Superintendent or designee shall regularly examine program results, including reports of the English language learners’ academic achievement, their progress towards proficiency in English and the progress of students who have been dedesignated as fluent English proficient. The Superintendent or designee shall annually report these finds to the Board and shall also provide the Board with regular reports from any district or schoolwide English learner advisory committees.

(cf. 6190 – Evaluation of the Instruction Program)

Type of Instruction

Students who are English language learners shall be educated through “sheltered English immersion” or “structured English immersion” during a temporary transition period not normally intended to exceed one year. “Nearly all” of the classroom instruction in the district’s sheltered English immersion program shall be in English, but with the curriculum and presentation designed for students who are learning the language. (Education Code 305, 306).

When an English language learner has acquired a reasonable level of English proficiency as measured by any of the state-designated assessments approved by the California Department of Education or any locally developed assessments and using other criteria developed by the district, he/she shall be transferred from a structured English immersion classroom to an English language mainstream classroom in which the instruction is “overwhelmingly” in English (Education Code 305; 5 CCR 11301)

An English language learner has acquired a "reasonable level of English proficiency" when he/she has achieved the following:

Grade level performance in reading, writing, listening and speaking

Early Advanced on CELDT measures for

(cf. 6011 - Academic Standards) (cf. 6162.5 - Student Assessment) (cf. 6171 - Title I Programs)

Upon the request of his/her parent/guardian, a student shall be placed in an English language mainstream classroom. (5CCR 11301)

http://www.gamutonline.net/displayPolicy/211099/6




Parental Exception Waivers

At any time during the school year, the parent/guardian of an English language learner may have his/her child moved into an English language mainstream program.

Parent/guardian requests for waivers from Education Code 305 regarding placement in a sheltered English immersion program shall be granted in accordance with law and administrative regulation.

Legal Reference:

EDUCATION CODE

300-340 English language education for immigrant children

430-446 English Learner and Immigrant Pupil Federal Conformity Act

33308.5 CDE guidelines not binding

44253.5-44253.10 Certification for bilingual-cross-cultural competence

48985 Notices to parents in language other than English

51101 Rights of parents to information

51101.1 Rights for parents of English learners

52130-52135 Impacted languages act of 1984

52160-52178 Bilingual Bicultural Act

52180-52186 Bilingual teacher training assistance program

54000-54028 Programs for disadvantaged children

60810-60812 Assessment of language development

62001-62005.5 Evaluation and sunsetting of programs

CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 5

4320 Determination of funding to support program to overcome the linguistic difficulties of English learners

11300-11316 English Language Learner Education

11510-11516 California English Language Development Test

UNITED STATES CODE, TITLE 20

1701-1705 Equal Educational Opportunities Act

6312 Local education agency plans

6801-6871 Title III, Language instruction for limited English proficient and immigrant students

COURT DECISIONS

Valeria G. v. Wilson, (9th Circuit) 2002 U.S. App. Lexis 20956

California Teachers Association et al. v. State Board of Education et al., (9th Circuit, 2001) 271 F.3d 1141

McLaughlin v. State Board of Education, (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 196

Teresa P. et al v. Berkeley Unified School District et al, (1989) 724 F.Supp. 698

Casteneda v. Pickard, (5th Cir. 1981) 648 F.2d 989

ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINIONS

83 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 40 (2000)

Management Resources:

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PUBLICATIONS

Guidelines for Reclassification of English Learners, September 2002

Accommodations for the California English Language Development Test, Revised 8/13/01


































Instruction AR 6174(a)

EDUCATION FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

Definitions

English learner means a student who does not speak English or whose native language is not English and who is not currently able to perform ordinary classroom work in English, also known as a limited English proficient or LEP child. (Education Code 306)

English language classroom means a classroom in which the language of instruction used by the teaching personnel is overwhelmingly the English language, and in which such teaching personnel possess a good knowledge of the English language. (Education Code 306)

English language mainstream classroom means a classroom in which the students either are native English language speakers or already have acquired reasonable fluency in English. (Education Code 306)

Sheltered English immersion or structured English immersion means an English language acquisition process in which nearly all classroom instruction is in English but with the curriculum and presentation designed for students who are learning the language. (Education Code 306)

Bilingual education/native language instruction means a language acquisition process for students in which much or all instruction, textbooks, and teaching materials are in the student's native language. (Education Code 306)

Identification and Assessment

Upon enrollment, each student's primary language shall be determined through use of a home language survey. (5 CCR 11307)

Within 30 calendar days of their initial enrollment, students who are identified as having a primary language other than English, as determined by the home language survey, and for whom there is no record of results from an English language development test shall be assessed using the California English Language Development Test (CELDT). (5 CCR 11511)

All students shall have sufficient time to complete the CELDT as provided in the directions for test administration. (5 CCR 11516)

Note: 5 CCR 11516.5 provides that students with disabilities shall also take the CELDT with accommodations, as specified below. A list of accommodations provided to students with disabilities may be found in the CDE's document Accommodations for the California English Language Development Test. Specific accommodations for each student will be detailed in his/her individualized education program (IEP) or Section 504 plan.

Any student with a disability shall take the CELDT with those accommodations for testing that the student has regularly used during instruction and classroom assessment as delineated in the student's individualized education program (IEP) or Section 504 plan that are appropriate and necessary to address the student's individual needs. (5 CCR 11516.5)

(cf. 6159 - Individualized Education Program) (cf. 6164.6 - Identification and Education Under Section 504)

The district shall notify parents/guardians of their child's results on the CELDT within 30 calendar days. (5 CCR 11511.5)

(cf. 5145.6 - Parental Notifications)

Within 90 days of initial enrollment, students identified as having limited English proficiency shall be further assessed for primary language proficiency in comprehension, speaking, reading and writing. The Superintendent or designee shall develop criteria for determining student needs on the basis of these assessments. (former Education Code 52164.1, 62002)

Before students are enrolled in a program for English language learners, parents/guardians shall receive information about the program and their opportunities for parental involvement. This information shall include the fact that an individual student's participation in the program is voluntary on the part of the parent/guardian. (Education Code 52173)



















Not later than 30 calendar days after the beginning of the school year, each parent/guardian of a student participating in, or identified for participation in, a language instruction program supported by federal Title III funds shall receive notification of the assessment of his/her child's English proficiency. The notice shall include all of the following: (Education Code 440; 20 USC 6312)

1. The reason for the student's classification as English language learner

2. The level of English proficiency

3. A description of the program for English language development instruction, including a description of all of the following:

a. The manner in which the program will meet the educational strengths and needs of the student

b. The manner in which the program will help the student develop his/her English proficiency and meet age-appropriate academic standards

c. The specific exit requirements for the program, the expected rate of transition from the program into classrooms not tailored for English language learner students, and the expected rate of graduation from secondary school if Title I funds are used for students in secondary schools

d. Where the student has been identified for special education, the manner in which the program meets the requirements of the student's IEP

4. Information regarding a parent/guardian's option to decline to allow the student to become enrolled in the program or to choose to allow the student to become enrolled in an alternative program

5. Information designed to assist a parent/guardian in selecting among available programs, if more than one program is offered

Parent/guardians also shall be notified of the results of any reassessments. (Education Code 52164.3)

Parental Exception Waivers

At the beginning of each school year, parents/guardians shall be informed of the placement of their children in a structured English immersion program and shall be notified of an opportunity to apply for a parental exception waiver. (Education Code 310; 5 CCR 11309)

A parent/guardian may request that the district waive the requirements of Education Code 305, pertaining to the placement of a student in a structured English immersion program if the one of the following circumstances exists:

1. Students who already know English: The student already possesses good English language skills, as measured by standardized tests of English vocabulary comprehension, reading and writing, in which the student scores at or above the state average for his/her grade level or at or above the fifth-grade average, whichever is lower. (Education Code 311(a))

2. Older students: The student is age 10 years or older, and it is the informed belief of the school principal and educational staff that an alternate course of study would be better suited to the student's rapid acquisition of basic English skills. (Education Code 311(b))

3. Students with special needs: The student already has been placed, for a period of not less than 30 calendar days during that school year, in an English language classroom and it is subsequently the informed belief of the school principal and educational staff that the student has special physical, emotional, psychological or educational needs and that an alternate course of educational study would be better suited to the student's overall educational development. (Education Code 311(c))

The parent/guardian shall personally visit the school to apply for the waiver. (Education Code 310)

Upon request for a waiver, the Superintendent or designee shall provide to the parents/guardians: (Education Code 310, 311; 5 CCR 11309)

1. A full written description, and a spoken description upon request, of the intent and content of the structured English immersion program, any alternative courses of study and all















educational opportunities offered by the district and available to the student, and the educational materials to be used in the different educational program choices

2. For a request for waiver pursuant to Education Code 311(c) for students with special needs, notification that the student must be placed for a period of not less than 30 calendar days in an English language classroom and that the Superintendent must approve the waiver pursuant to Governing Board guidelines

Pursuant to Education Code 311(b) and 311(c), the principal and educational staff may recommend a waiver to a parent/guardian for a student 10 years or older and a student with special needs. Parents/guardians shall be informed in writing of any recommendation for an alternative program made by the principal and staff and shall be given notice of their right to refuse to accept the recommendation. The notice shall include a full description of the recommended alternative program and the educational materials to be used for the alternative program as well as a description of all other programs available to the student. If the parent/guardian elects to request the alternative program recommended by the principal and educational staff, the parent/guardian shall comply with district procedures and requirements otherwise applicable to a parental exception waiver, including Education Code 310. (5 CCR 11309)

When evaluating waiver requests pursuant to Education Code 311(a) for students who already know English and other waiver requests for those students for whom standardized assessment data are not available, other equivalent assessment measures may be used. These equivalent measures may include local assessments, local standards and teacher evaluations.

Parental exception waivers pursuant to Education Code 311(b) for students 10 years or older shall be granted if it is the informed belief of the principal and educational staff that an alternate course of educational study would be better suited to the student's rapid acquisition of basic English language skills. (Education Code 311)

Parental exception waivers pursuant to Education Code 311(c) for students with special needs shall be granted if it is the informed belief of the principal and educational staff that, due to the student's special physical, emotional, psychological or educational needs, an alternate course of educational study would be better suited to the student's overall educational development. (Education Code 311)

The principal shall consider all waiver requests made pursuant to Education Code 311(c) for students with special needs and shall submit a rationale of the decision regarding the waiver to the Superintendent or designee. When determining whether or not to recommend the approval of the waiver request, the principal shall assume that the facts justifying the request attested by the parent/guardian are a true representation of the child's condition.

Each waiver shall be considered on its individual merits with great deference given to parental preference for student placement.

The principal or designee shall act upon all parental exception waivers within 20 instructional days of submission to the principal. However, parental waiver requests pursuant to Education Code 311(c) for students with special needs shall not be acted upon during the 30-day placement in an English language classroom. These waivers shall be acted upon no later than 10 calendar days after the expiration of that 30-day English language classroom placement or within 20 instructional days of submission of the waiver to the principal, whichever is later. (5 CCR 11309)

All parental exception waivers shall be granted unless the principal and educational staff have determined that an alternative program offered at the school would not be better suited for the overall educational development of the student. (5 CCR 11309)

Individual schools in which 20 students or more of a given grade level receive a waiver shall be required to offer such a class; otherwise they must allow the students to transfer to a public school in which such a class is offered. (Education Code 310)

Students wishing to transfer shall be subject to the district's intradistrict and interdistrict attendance policies and administrative regulations. Students wishing to transfer to another district shall also be subject to the receiving district's interdistrict attendance policies and administrative regulations.

(cf. 5116.1 - Intradistrict Open Enrollment) (cf. 5117 - Interdistrict Attendance)


















In cases where a parental exception waiver pursuant to Education Code 311(b) or (c) is denied, the parent/guardian shall be informed in writing of the reason(s) for the denial and advised that he/she may appeal the decision to the Board if the Board authorizes such an appeal, or to the court. (5 CCR 11309)

Waiver requests shall be renewed annually by the parent/guardian. (Education Code 310)

Reclassification/Redesignation

The district shall continue to provide additional and appropriate educational services to English language learners for the purposes of overcoming language barriers until the English language learners have: (5 CCR 11302)

1. Demonstrated English language proficiency comparable to that of the district's average native English language speakers

2. Recouped any academic deficits which may have been incurred in other areas of the core curriculum as a result of language barriers

English language learners shall be redesignated as fluent English proficient when they are able to comprehend, speak, read and write English well enough to receive instruction in the regular program and make academic progress at a level substantially equivalent to that of students of the same age or grade whose primary language is English and who are in the regular course of study. (Education Code 52164.6)

The following measures shall be used to determine whether an English language learner shall be reclassified as fluent English proficient: (5 CCR 11303)

1. Assessment of English language proficiency utilizing the CELDT as the primary criterion, and objective assessment of the student's English reading and writing skills

2. Participation of the student's classroom teacher and any other certificated staff with direct responsibility for teaching or placement decisions

3. Parent/guardian opinion and consultation during a redesignation interview

4. Parents/guardians shall receive notice and a description of the redesignation process, including notice of their right to participate in the process. Parent/guardian participation in the process shall be encouraged.

5. Comparison of performance in basic skills, including performance on the English-Language Arts section of the California Standards Test

6. Objective data on the student's academic performance in English

The Superintendent or designee shall provide subsequent monitoring and support for redesignated students, including but not limited to monitoring the performance of redesignated students in the core curriculum in comparison with their native-English speaking peers, monitoring the rate of redesignation, and ensuring correct classification and placement.

The Superintendent or designee shall develop a process to monitor the effectiveness of the district's program for English language learners. The district's program shall be modified as needed to help ensure language and academic success for each English language learner.

Advisory Committees

At the district level when there are more than 50 English language learners in the district and at each school with more than 20 English language learners, parent/guardian advisory committees shall be maintained to serve the advisory functions specified in law. (5 CCR 11308)

Parents/guardians of English language learners shall constitute committee membership in at least the same percentage as their children represent of the total number of students in the school. (Education Code 52176)

The district's English language advisory committee shall advise the Board on at least the following tasks: (5 CCR 11308)

1. The development of a district master plan of education programs and services for English learners, taking into consideration the school site plans for English learners











2. The districtwide needs assessment on a school-by-school basis

3. Establishment of a district program, goals and objectives for programs and services for English learners

4. Development of a plan to ensure compliance with applicable teacher or aide requirements

5. Administration of the annual language census

6. Review of and comment on the district's reclassification procedures

7. Review of and comments on the written notification required to be sent to parents/guardians pursuant to 5 CCR 11300-11316

(cf. 0420 - School Plans/Site Councils) (cf. 1220 - Citizen Advisory Committees) (cf. 5020 - Parent Rights and Responsibilities) (cf. 6020 - Parent Involvement)

In order to assist advisory members in carrying out their responsibilities, the Superintendent or designee shall ensure that committee members receive appropriate training and materials. This training shall be planned in full consultation with the members. (5 CCR 11308)









Forms/Waivers/Letters: Preliminary Program Placement

Parent Notification of Primary Language Testing

Primary Language Testing Exemption

Structured English Immersion Program Exemption

Program Placement Notification

Initial CELDT Results Parent Notification (English & 1st language)

Annual CELDT Results Parent Notification

Reclassification Form

Reclassification Follow-Up

Reclassification Follow-Up Accountability Roster

ELL Checklist

Waivers Parental Exception Waiver

Bilingual Parental Waiver Request

Letters

Reclassification Parent Letter

Brochure

CELDT Information Parent Brochure

Add copy of district policy and procedure for Education for English Language Learners