mba 647
DESCRIPTION
business process managementTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: MBA 647](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051517/55cf931f550346f57b9be6ab/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Study of change management in US Army ERP Implementation
Group 5
Manish YadavMonika Bhardwaj
Parth Mittal
![Page 2: MBA 647](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051517/55cf931f550346f57b9be6ab/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Abstract
Aim: To make an attempt to model change management problems using the concepts associated with actor dependency modeling.
Position: Department of Defense
Mission: "to fight and win our Nation’s wars by providing prompt, sustained land dominance across the full range of military operations and spectrum of conflict in support of combatant commanders."
![Page 3: MBA 647](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051517/55cf931f550346f57b9be6ab/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Actors and dependency among them
External actors: Government, Citizen and Suppliers
Internal actors: Institutional Army, Operational Army and Implementation partner
![Page 4: MBA 647](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051517/55cf931f550346f57b9be6ab/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Sponsorship ERPs require sustained leadership
Sponsor
System Integrator
![Page 5: MBA 647](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051517/55cf931f550346f57b9be6ab/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Sponsor of change: Leader
Culture: The army can be resistant to change
![Page 6: MBA 647](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051517/55cf931f550346f57b9be6ab/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Communicator
Operational Army Institutional Army personnel
![Page 7: MBA 647](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051517/55cf931f550346f57b9be6ab/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
External stakeholders
Legislator: Government
Tax payer: Citizens
![Page 8: MBA 647](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051517/55cf931f550346f57b9be6ab/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
S-D model
• The hard goal in hand is risk management • Risk management for U. S Army case risk identification risk analysis risk evaluation and risk treatment and monitoring
![Page 9: MBA 647](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051517/55cf931f550346f57b9be6ab/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
SD DIAGRAM FOR THE PHASES OF RISK MANAGEMENT
![Page 10: MBA 647](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051517/55cf931f550346f57b9be6ab/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
SD model representing dependency between Government and Consultant
![Page 11: MBA 647](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051517/55cf931f550346f57b9be6ab/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
SD model showing dependency between Operational Army and Institutional Army
![Page 12: MBA 647](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051517/55cf931f550346f57b9be6ab/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Inference
Institutional Army personnel convey the required information about usage of systems to the soldiers and receive the feedback, which helps in minimizing the risk of communication gap between these two actors.
![Page 13: MBA 647](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051517/55cf931f550346f57b9be6ab/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
SR model representing dependency between Consultant and Institutional Army
![Page 14: MBA 647](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051517/55cf931f550346f57b9be6ab/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
INFERENCE
• Lack of experience of consultant with army will destroy the entire objective of ERP implementation and thus acts as a break to the goal of ERP implementation.
• Governance mechanism is required to monitor the activities and ensure that the process benefit the army.
• The Institutional Army can carry out the required governance.
• It breaks the break and assists in the objective of successful ERP implementation
![Page 15: MBA 647](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051517/55cf931f550346f57b9be6ab/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
SR Model for Risk Management
![Page 16: MBA 647](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051517/55cf931f550346f57b9be6ab/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Question tackled by this modeling
• Why does ERP Implementation encounter risk due to misunderstanding of requirements? Because the objective will not be achieved without understanding the requirements
• Why does ERP Implementation poses a risk due to top management change? Because change in top management can lead to different definition of responsibilities and requirements. • Why does insufficient funding poses a risk for ERP implementation? Because insufficient fund will affect the team members salary and infrastructure availability. • Why does ERP Implementation may fail due to Low top management support?Because top management support is not adequate. Sustained management support is essential throughout the project to influence the success of ERP adoption.
• Why does ERP Implementation poses a risk due to inadequate user involvement? Because User involvement is important in meeting expectations. Key users should be convinced of the system utility
![Page 17: MBA 647](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051517/55cf931f550346f57b9be6ab/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Inferences• Help them maintain the correct data to take future decisions
• Addresses the issue of risk being involved in implementing the ERP in an organisation
• Help the designers and architects of the system to understand some of the early phases of implementation
• Leveraged the concept of actor dependency of i* and addresses its limitations for use in risk management by defining the concepts of risk goals and risky tasks
![Page 18: MBA 647](https://reader033.vdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022051517/55cf931f550346f57b9be6ab/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Thank You