mcfall v. shimp curran v. bosze jennifer ganesh law values and public policy sts 2400
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e225503460f94b0e796/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
McFall v. ShimpCurran v. BoszeMcFall v. ShimpCurran v. Bosze
Jennifer GaneshLaw Values and Public Policy
STS 2400
![Page 2: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e225503460f94b0e796/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
McFall v. ShimpMcFall v. Shimp
Plaintiff- McFall needs a transplant Defendant- Shimp has high compatibility rating Shimp refuses to go through with procedure McFall files an injunction against Shimp
![Page 3: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e225503460f94b0e796/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Plaintiff’s CasePlaintiff’s Case
Plaintiff’s Defense- King Edward I. St. Westminster 2, 13 Ed., I, c 24
This Court derives its power from this statute because this court is a successor of the English Courts of Chancery
![Page 4: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e225503460f94b0e796/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Defendant’s CaseDefendant’s Case
Common law- no legal compulsion to give aid or to take action
to save another human being
![Page 5: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e225503460f94b0e796/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
JudgmentJudgment
“For our law to compel the defendant to submit to an intrusion of his body would change every concept and principle upon which our society is founded. To do so would defeat the sanctity of the individual.....”
![Page 6: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e225503460f94b0e796/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
AppealsAppeals
Appealed and went to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court
S.C. agreed with lower court’s decision This case set precedent for many other cases-
Angela Carder Story
![Page 7: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e225503460f94b0e796/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Curran v. BoszeCurran v. Bosze
Jean Pierre- 12 year old with rare form of leukemia
2 younger siblings that might be a match for a bone marrow transplant
Mother of the twins refuse to grant permission for testing
![Page 8: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e225503460f94b0e796/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Plaintiff’s DefensePlaintiff’s Defense
Best Interest Standard- what is the best choice for the minors?
Substituted Judgment- what would the children do if they were not minors?
![Page 9: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e225503460f94b0e796/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Defendant’s DefenseDefendant’s Defense
Curran believes that the tests and actual donation may harm the twins both physically and emotionally
Risks outweighs the benefits
![Page 10: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e225503460f94b0e796/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
JudgmentJudgment
Petition denied
No concrete evidence that the twins would want to go through with the bone marrow transplant
![Page 11: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e225503460f94b0e796/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
AppealAppeal
Went to Illinois Supreme Court
Decision of Circuit Court was upheld
![Page 12: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e225503460f94b0e796/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Questions? Comments?Questions? Comments?
![Page 13: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022072011/56649e225503460f94b0e796/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
ReferencesReferences http://imc.gsm.com/demos/dddemo/consult/statel
aw/cases_il.htm http://people.brandeis.edu/~teuber/lawmcfall.htm
l http://lawlibrary.ucdavis.edu/LAWLIB/June99/01
61.html http://www.lib.niu.edu/ipo/ii910326.html http://www.nocirc.org/articles/prescott3.html