mcfall v. shimp curran v. bosze jennifer ganesh law values and public policy sts 2400

13
McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400

Upload: reginald-owens

Post on 26-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400

McFall v. ShimpCurran v. BoszeMcFall v. ShimpCurran v. Bosze

Jennifer GaneshLaw Values and Public Policy

STS 2400

Page 2: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400

McFall v. ShimpMcFall v. Shimp

Plaintiff- McFall needs a transplant Defendant- Shimp has high compatibility rating Shimp refuses to go through with procedure McFall files an injunction against Shimp

Page 3: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400

Plaintiff’s CasePlaintiff’s Case

Plaintiff’s Defense- King Edward I. St. Westminster 2, 13 Ed., I, c 24

This Court derives its power from this statute because this court is a successor of the English Courts of Chancery

Page 4: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400

Defendant’s CaseDefendant’s Case

Common law- no legal compulsion to give aid or to take action

to save another human being

Page 5: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400

JudgmentJudgment

“For our law to compel the defendant to submit to an intrusion of his body would change every concept and principle upon which our society is founded. To do so would defeat the sanctity of the individual.....”

Page 6: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400

AppealsAppeals

Appealed and went to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court

S.C. agreed with lower court’s decision This case set precedent for many other cases-

Angela Carder Story

Page 7: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400

Curran v. BoszeCurran v. Bosze

Jean Pierre- 12 year old with rare form of leukemia

2 younger siblings that might be a match for a bone marrow transplant

Mother of the twins refuse to grant permission for testing

Page 8: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400

Plaintiff’s DefensePlaintiff’s Defense

Best Interest Standard- what is the best choice for the minors?

Substituted Judgment- what would the children do if they were not minors?

Page 9: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400

Defendant’s DefenseDefendant’s Defense

Curran believes that the tests and actual donation may harm the twins both physically and emotionally

Risks outweighs the benefits

Page 10: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400

JudgmentJudgment

Petition denied

No concrete evidence that the twins would want to go through with the bone marrow transplant

Page 11: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400

AppealAppeal

Went to Illinois Supreme Court

Decision of Circuit Court was upheld

Page 12: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400

Questions? Comments?Questions? Comments?

Page 13: McFall v. Shimp Curran v. Bosze Jennifer Ganesh Law Values and Public Policy STS 2400

ReferencesReferences http://imc.gsm.com/demos/dddemo/consult/statel

aw/cases_il.htm http://people.brandeis.edu/~teuber/lawmcfall.htm

l http://lawlibrary.ucdavis.edu/LAWLIB/June99/01

61.html http://www.lib.niu.edu/ipo/ii910326.html http://www.nocirc.org/articles/prescott3.html