mcr.aacrjournals.org · web view0.05 0.007 0.0015 0.0002 33 perk 0.84 0.24 0.019 0.009 44 pakt 0.47...
Embed Size (px)
TRANSCRIPT
Supplementary Data
Table 1. IC50 values (M) of gefitinib (A) and erlotinib (B) toward wild type and L858R EGFR. After starvation, cells were preincubated with different concentrations of gefitinib or erlitinib for 30 minutes and then stimulated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 2 minutes. Cell lysates were run on SDS-PAGE and receptor phosphorylation at different tyrosine residues were detected by western blotting with specific phospho-EGFR antibodies. In order to determine the concentration of kinase inhibitor (gefitinib or erlotinib) that resulted in 50% EGFR activity (IC50), the data were fitted to the following equation. Percent activity = (activitymax*IC50) / (IC50 + [kinase inhibitor]) + constant.
tyrosine residues
wild type
L858R
845
0.083 0.029
0.013 ± 0.002
992
0.020 0.002
0.018 0.003
1045
0.019 0.002
0.008 0.001
1068
0.074 0.022
0.054 0.015
1148
0.071 0.013
0.016 0.001
1173
0.037 0.006
0.010 0.002
A.
tyrosine residues
wild type
L858R
845
0.150 0.046
0.005 0.001
992
0.015 0.002
0.010 0.001
1045
0.015 0.001
0.003 0.0002
1068
0.059 0.018
0.035 0.004
1148
0.034 0.003
0.018 0.004
1173
0.025 0.003
0.006 0.0006
B.
Table 2. IC50 (M) of gefitinib (A) and erlotinib (B) toward downstream signaling proteins in 32D cells. After starvation, cells were preincubated with different concentrations of gefitinib for 30 minutes and then stimulated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 2 minutes. Cell lysates were run on SDS-PAGE and various EGFR signaling proteins were detected by western blotting with total and phospho-antibodies. In order to determine the concentration of kinase inhibitor (gefitinib or erlotinib) that resulted in 50% EGFR activity (IC50), the data were fitted to the following equation. Percent activity = (activitymax*IC50) / (IC50 + [kinase inhibitor]) + constant.
32D wild type
32D L858R
Fold-difference
pCbl
3.74 0.36
0.013 0.0033
288
pERK
1.08 0.25
0.012 0.006
90
pAKT
0.92 0.22
0.028 0.013
33
pPLC-
0.13 0.02
0.008 0.002
16
pSTAT3
0.017 0.003
0.025 0.009
1
pSrc
4.12 5.58
> 0.5**
<8
pPI3K
0.16 0.13
> 0.5**
<0.3
pSTAT5
0.068 0.033
0.0038 0.0005
18
A.
**shows no inhibition up to indicated concentrations of gefitinib
32D wild type
32D L858R
Fold-difference
pCbl
0.05 0.007
0.0015 0.0002
33
pERK
0.84 0.24
0.019 0.009
44
pAKT
0.47 0.16
0.023 0.011
20
pPLC-
0.78 0.05
0.0048 0.0010
163
pSTAT3
0.0061 0.0009
0.00087 0.00038
7
pSrc
0.042 0.011
> 0.5**
<0.1
pPI3K
0.46 0.10
> 0.5**
<1
pSTAT5
0.64 0.54
0.0024 0.0011
267
B.
**shows no inhibition up to indicated concentrations of erlotinib
Table 3. IC50 (M) of gefitinib (A) and erlotinib (B) toward downstream signaling proteins in cancer cell lines. After starvation, cells were preincubated with different concentrations of gefitinib for 30 minutes and then stimulated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 2 minutes. Cell lysates were run on SDS-PAGE and various EGFR signaling proteins were detected by western blotting with total and phospho-antibodies. In order to determine the concentration of kinase inhibitor (gefitinib or erlotinib) that resulted in 50% EGFR activity (IC50), the data were fitted to the following equation. Percent activity = (activitymax*IC50) / (IC50 + [kinase inhibitor]) + constant.
A.
A431
H3255
Fold-difference
pCbl
0.016 0.0052
0.00016 0.00003
100
pERK
0.041 0.031
0.0015 0.0018
27
pAKT
0.10 0.077
0.0037 0.00003
27
pPLC-
0.046 0.014
0.0049 0.0052
9
pSTAT3
0.028 0.0087
0.0052 0.010
5
pSrc
> 1**
> 0.04**
pSTAT5
0.035 0.030
0.0080 0.017
4
**shows no inhibition up to indicated concentrations of gefitinib
A431
H3255
Fold-difference
pCbl
0.043 0.030
0.0012 0.00079
36
pERK
0.0045 0.0037
0.00032 0.00011
14
pAKT
0.10 0.16
0.0017 0.001
59
pPLC-
0.071 ± 0.003
0.0021 0.00088
34
pSTAT3
0.21 0.049
> 0.04**
< 5
pSrc
> 1.0**
> 0.04**
pSTAT5
0.021 0.0075
0.000052±0.00001
404
B.
**shows no inhibition up to indicated concentrations of erlotinib
Figure 1. (A) Effect of gefitinib on activation of EGFR signaling proteins in 32D cells. (B) Effect of erlotinib on activation of EGFR signaling proteins in 32D cells. After serum starvation, cells were preincubated with the indicated concentrations of gefitinib for 30 minutes and then stimulated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 2 minutes. Cell lysates were run on SDS-PAGE and various EGFR signaling proteins were detected by western blotting with total and phospho-antibodies.
(A)
(B)
Figure 2. (A) Effect of gefitinib on activation of EGFR signaling proteins in cancer cells. (B) Effect of erlotinib on activation of EGFR signaling proteins in cancer cells. After serum starvation, cells were preincubated with the indicated concentrations of gefitinib for 30 minutes and then stimulated with 100 ng/ml EGF for 2 minutes. Cell lysates were run on SDS-PAGE and various EGFR signaling proteins were detected by western blotting with total and phospho-antibodies.
(A)
(B)
pAKTAKTpERKERKpPLC-PLC-pSTAT3STAT3
gefitinib(M)
pSrcSrcA431H3255pCblCblA431H3255pSTAT5STAT5
gefitinib(M)
erlotinib(M)
pAKTAKTpERKERKpPLC-PLC-pSTAT3STAT3pSrcSrcpCblCbl
erlotinib (M)
pSTAT5STAT5A431H3255A431H3255
pAKTAKTpERKERKpPLC-PLC-pSTAT3STAT3
gefitinib(M)
pSrcSrcwild typeL834RpCblpPI3KCbl
gefitinib(M)
wild typeL834RPI3KpSTAT5STAT5
erlotinib(M)
pAKTAKTpERKERKpPLC-PLC-pSTAT3STAT3pSrcSrcwild typeL834RpCblpPI3KCbl
erlotinib (M)
wild typeL834RPI3KpSTAT5STAT5