measuring and rewarding physician performance: a national movement david s. p. hopkins, ph.d....
TRANSCRIPT
Measuring and Rewarding Physician Performance: A National Movement
David S. P. Hopkins, Ph.D.
Pacific Business Group on Health
Provider Reimbursement Web Summit
June 16-27, 2003
2 of 18
About the Pacific Business Group on Health
PBGH’s 47 major purchasers represent 3 million employees, retirees and their families and billions of dollars in annual health care expenditures
PBGH operates PacAdvantage (formerly the Health Insurance Plan of California); doing joint purchasing on behalf of 14,500 small employers with 125,000 lives
4 of 18
Pacific Business Group on Health: Mission and Priorities
Quality Measurement and Improvement
Value Purchasing Consumer Engagement
Mission: To improve the quality and availability of health care while moderating costs.
5 of 18
Quality Measurement Improvement Increase the availability and usability of quality
and economic efficiency performance information for all levels of care
Health Plans Hospitals Medical Group Individual Physicians
Identify high impact methods to improve performance and create market demand for adoption by plans and providers through effective value purchasing and consumer engagement efforts
6 of 18
Value Purchasing
Enable purchasers to make value-based choices that promote efficient delivery and equitable access to high-quality care
Support improvements in accountability with regard to the delivery, purchasing and consumption of health care
7 of 18
Consumer Engagement
Encourage the use of performance information by consumers.
Make information available for every level of the health care system and provided in ways and at times consumers believe are relevant and critical to their needs
Use information to encourage value-based decision-making
8 of 18
Cost Trends Driving Purchasers to Care About Value & Look at Physician-Level Performance Purchasers see need to “drill down” to
provider level to maximize opportunity for quality/efficiency improvement
Clinical quality and efficiency varies widely at the provider level
Current payment system not rewarding superior provider value
9 of 18
Where Physician Performance Differentiation Needs Be• Physicians (1) are rewarded for quality and
efficiency, (2) have usable information for QI and (3) can make better informed referrals
• Physician groups have information to support pay-for-performance and QI
• Plans have a valid, standardized basis for identifying and rewarding high-value physicians and groups
• Employers have information for use in benefit design
• Consumers have information for use better informed decision-making
10 of 18
Physician Performance Measurement Framework Patient experience Quality of care Efficiency of care Office systems
PBGH working to advance every level…
11 of 18
PBGH/Medical Group Patient Survey Pilot (2003)• Purpose – Evaluate methods & value
of brief survey of patients’ experiences with doctor
• Approach – Using medical group data files, survey patients about doctor experiences based on 1+ visits in last year
• Stakeholders – PBGH, California HealthCare Foundation & 500+ doctors from eight medical groups
12 of 18
Patient Survey Pilot -- Questions Being Answered
Valid, Meaningful Measures– Can we identify measures that discriminate performance,
have sound technical properties and are important to consumers?
Affordable– Comparing web and phone based methods to mail -- are
there less costly and valid routes?Actionable– Can physicians get meaningful information; can medical
groups use results to improve process & behavior?– Are the survey results relevant to performance payment
systems?– For the future – how best can the results be translated for
consumers.
13 of 18
Physician Quality and Efficiency California Pilot• Supported by PBGH member Quality Fund
contributions and federal AHRQ “Partnerships for Quality” grant (4 years, $1.4M)
• Assess efficiency measures to be based on severity-adjusted episode analysis of claims data
• Assess quality measures to be based on claims data representation of evidence-based medicine (e.g., HEDIS)
• Scientific Advisory Board comprised of experts in physician evaluation methodology
14 of 18
Physician Quality and Efficiency Proof-of-Concept Pilot (2003)• Develop and test efficiency measures for
two specialties using sample claims data
• Identify best-in-class quality measurement vendor(s)
• Perform comparative analysis of data sources:
— CMS
— Health plan (PPO)
— Employer
• Advance partnerships
15 of 18
Physician Performance Measurement -- Office Systems
Link to existing efforts:
CMS Doctors Office Quality NCQA/GE Physician Rewards Initiative IHA Pay-for-Performance IT systems
measures
16 of 18
Physician Performance -- Key Partnerships CMS Employers Health Plans Physician groups State medical association Consumer groups (e.g., AARP) Other employer coalitions
17 of 18
“End Game” – Not if, but how
fast…• Physicians are (1) rewarded for quality and efficiency, (2) have usable information for QI and (3) can make better informed referrals
• Physician groups have information to support pay-for-performance and QI
• Plans have a valid, standardized basis for identifying and rewarding high-value physicians and groups
• Employers have information for use in benefit design
• Consumers have information for use better informed decision-making
18 of 18
To Learn More…www.pbgh.org—an overview of PBGH programs and initiatives
www.HealthScope.org—consumer Web site with health plan and provider quality measurements
www.PacAdvantage.org—small group purchasing pool
demo.chooser.pbgh.org—assists in the selection of health plans and providers
www.diabetescqi.org—collaborative Diabetes CQI Project description and resources for plans providers
To subscribe to the PBGH E-Letter, go to www.pbgh.org/news/eletters