mechanical properties of aluminum & alumina by cold spray process

1
Mechanical Properties of Aluminum & Alumina by Cold Spray Process BACKGROUND PURPOSE MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS FUTURE RESEARCH ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Al Al2O3 http://www.ktech.com/Advanced_Manufacturing/Design_Build/ Cold_Spray_System.html Figure 2 50/50 Al /Al203 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 Al/Al2O3 Mixture Vickers Hardness Figure 6 Vicker’s Hardness Test Figure 4 Dog Bone 1 Figure 5 Dog Bone 2 Faculty Advisors: Dr. Michael West – REU Site Director Dr. Bharat Jasthi – AMP Research Assistant Dr. Alfred Boysen – Technical Communications Program Information National Science Foundation’s Research Experience for Undergraduates Summer 2011 Grant #0852057 Figure 3 90% Al203/10% Al Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 1 Authors Ashleigh Giffen, Myriah Santistevan Materials Al/Al203 Cold Spray Deposits courtesy of Erik Klinckman, and teammates Nathan Salden, and Owen Britton Cast Iron Dog-Bone Mold Equipment Cold Spray Equipment Vickers Microhardness Machine Scanning Electron Microscope Optical Microscope Procedures 1)The authors collaborated with Erik Klinckman to evaluate the microstructure of Al/Al203 mixture with various weight ratios. 2)The authors provided Erik Klinckman with a dog bone mold made by Matthew Carriker. The purpose of this dog bone was to make a deposit and evaluate the tensile properties of a Al/Al203 deposition. 3)Due to the results of #2, the authors redesigned the dog bone. Refer to “Results #3”. 4)Deposition of Al/Al203 onto stainless steal foil substrate. Removed deposit from the substrate using CPT. Deposit cut into 4 pieces, mounted and studied. Refer to “Results #4”. Cold Spray Deposition Discovered in mid-1980’s Been used to repair or reinforce metals Little known about mechanical properties of deposition itself Al/Al203 Deposition Research on thermal expansion of deposits by Erik Klinckman and team Analysis of mechanical properties of the deposits has not been researched. Understand the microstructure and hardness of Al/Al203 Understand the Mechanical Properties of Al/Al203 Cold Spray deposit Learn what treatments will effectively strengthen these properties and why In doing this we will be able to better explain the importance of Cold Spray in the commercial world 1)Evaluated 50/50 weight (Figure 2) & 10%Al/90%Al203 (Figure 3). Weight not equal to density. 50/50 is easily sprayed, 10/90 would be stronger but not efficient deposit. 2)Design of dog bone 1 (Figure 4) unsuccessful. When attempting to remove the dog bone, deposit crumbled. (Figure 9) 3)The authors have obtained new mold (Figure 5). Deposit is yet to be sprayed. 4)Performed microhardness testing (Figure 6) on solid sample (Figure 7) and on a cracked sample (Figure 8) 1)Acquire successful dog bone deposit to perform tensile testing 2)Anneal deposit to observe effects on mechanical properties 3)Friction Stir process deposit and observe effects on mechanical properties The authors would like to thank Dr. Michael West, Dr. Bharat Jasthi and Dr. Christian Widener (AMP Center Director) for their guidance throughout the project. We would like to thank Dr. Alfred Boysen for helping us to prepare our poster and paper. A special thanks goes to NSF for supporting us and our research.

Upload: easter

Post on 25-Feb-2016

58 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Mechanical Properties of Aluminum & Alumina by Cold Spray Process. Program Information National Science Foundation’s Research Experience for Undergraduates Summer 2011 Grant #0852057 . Authors Ashleigh Giffen , Myriah Santistevan. Faculty Advisors: Dr. Michael West – REU Site Director - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mechanical Properties of Aluminum & Alumina by Cold Spray Process

Mechanical Properties of Aluminum & Alumina by Cold Spray Process

BACKGROUND

PURPOSE

MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS

FUTURE RESEARCH

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Al Al2O3

http://www.ktech.com/Advanced_Manufacturing/Design_Build/Cold_Spray_System.html

Figure 2 50/50 Al /Al203

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 935.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

55.0

60.0

65.0

70.0 Al/Al2O3 Mixture

Vic

kers

Har

dnes

s

Figure 6 Vicker’s Hardness Test

Figure 4 Dog Bone 1 Figure 5 Dog Bone 2

Faculty Advisors: Dr. Michael West – REU Site Director

Dr. Bharat Jasthi – AMP Research AssistantDr. Alfred Boysen – Technical Communications

Program InformationNational Science Foundation’s

Research Experience for Undergraduates Summer 2011 Grant #0852057

Figure 3 90% Al203/10% Al

Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9Figure 1

AuthorsAshleigh Giffen,

Myriah Santistevan

MaterialsAl/Al203 Cold Spray Deposits courtesy of Erik Klinckman, and

teammates Nathan Salden, and Owen BrittonCast Iron Dog-Bone Mold

EquipmentCold Spray Equipment

Vickers Microhardness MachineScanning Electron Microscope

Optical MicroscopeProcedures1)The authors collaborated with Erik Klinckman to evaluate the microstructure of Al/Al203 mixture with various weight ratios. 2)The authors provided Erik Klinckman with a dog bone mold made by Matthew Carriker. The purpose of this dog bone was to make a deposit and evaluate the tensile properties of a Al/Al203 deposition.3)Due to the results of #2, the authors redesigned the dog bone. Refer to “Results #3”.4)Deposition of Al/Al203 onto stainless steal foil substrate. Removed deposit from the substrate using CPT. Deposit cut into 4 pieces, mounted and studied. Refer to “Results #4”.

Cold Spray Deposition• Discovered in mid-1980’s • Been used to repair or reinforce metals• Little known about mechanical properties of

deposition itselfAl/Al203 Deposition• Research on thermal expansion of deposits

by Erik Klinckman and team• Analysis of mechanical properties of the

deposits has not been researched.

• Understand the microstructure and hardness of Al/Al203

• Understand the Mechanical Properties of Al/Al203 Cold Spray deposit

• Learn what treatments will effectively strengthen these properties and why

• In doing this we will be able to better explain the importance of Cold Spray in the commercial world

1) Evaluated 50/50 weight (Figure 2) & 10%Al/90%Al203 (Figure 3). Weight not equal to density. 50/50 is easily sprayed, 10/90 would be stronger but not efficient deposit.

2) Design of dog bone 1 (Figure 4) unsuccessful. When attempting to remove the dog bone, deposit crumbled. (Figure 9)

3) The authors have obtained new mold (Figure 5). Deposit is yet to be sprayed.

4) Performed microhardness testing (Figure 6) on solid sample (Figure 7) and on a cracked sample (Figure 8)

1) Acquire successful dog bone deposit to perform tensile testing

2) Anneal deposit to observe effects on mechanical properties

3) Friction Stir process deposit and observe effects on mechanical properties

The authors would like to thank Dr. Michael West, Dr. Bharat Jasthi and Dr. Christian Widener (AMP Center Director) for their guidance throughout the project. We would like to thank Dr. Alfred Boysen for helping us to prepare our poster and paper. A special thanks goes to NSF for supporting us and our research.