mechanochemical scission of transition metal-ligand bonds ... · 11/11/2015 · useful chemical...
TRANSCRIPT
Mechanochemical scission of transition metal-ligand bonds incoordination polymersCitation for published version (APA):Balan, A. (2015). Mechanochemical scission of transition metal-ligand bonds in coordination polymers.Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
Document status and date:Published: 11/11/2015
Document Version:Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers)
Please check the document version of this publication:
• A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can beimportant differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. Peopleinterested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit theDOI to the publisher's website.• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and pagenumbers.Link to publication
General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright ownersand it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.
• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license above, pleasefollow below link for the End User Agreement:www.tue.nl/taverne
Take down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at:[email protected] details and we will investigate your claim.
Download date: 12. Sep. 2020
Mechanochemical Scission of Transition Metal-‐Ligand Bonds in Coordination Polymers
PROEFSCHRIFT
ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.dr.ir. F.P.T. Baaijens, voor een commissie aangewezen door het College voor Promoties, in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 11 november 2015 om 16:00 uur
door
Abidin Balan
geboren te Malatya, Turkije
Dit proefschrift is goedgekeurd door de promotoren en de samenstelling van de promotiecommissie is als volgt: voorzitter: prof.dr.ir. J.C. Schouten 1e promotor: prof.dr. R.P. Sijbesma 2e promotor: prof.dr. E.W. Meijer leden: prof.dr. J.H.N. Reek (UvA) prof.dr. G. Cravotto (Politecnico di Torino) prof.dr.ir. E.J.M. Hensen prof.dr. A.P.H.J. Schenning
Het onderzoek of ontwerp dat in dit proefschrift wordt beschreven is uitgevoerd in overeenstemming met de TU/e Gedragscode Wetenschapsbeoefening.
To my wife,
Gizem’e
Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were, but without it we go nowhere.
(Carl Sagan)
The highest activity a human being can attain is learning for understanding, because to understand is to be free.
(Baruch Spinoza)
Dit proefschrift is goedgekeurd door de promotoren en de samenstelling van de promotiecommissie is als volgt: voorzitter: prof.dr.ir. J.C. Schouten 1e promotor: prof.dr. R.P. Sijbesma 2e promotor: prof.dr. E.W. Meijer leden: prof.dr. J.H.N. Reek (UvA) prof.dr. G. Cravotto (Politecnico di Torino) prof.dr.ir. E.J.M. Hensen prof.dr. A.P.H.J. Schenning
Het onderzoek of ontwerp dat in dit proefschrift wordt beschreven is uitgevoerd in overeenstemming met de TU/e Gedragscode Wetenschapsbeoefening.
To my wife,
Gizem’e
Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were, but without it we go nowhere.
(Carl Sagan)
The highest activity a human being can attain is learning for understanding, because to understand is to be free.
(Baruch Spinoza)
Abidin Balan
Mechanochemical Scission of Transition Metal-‐Ligand Bonds in Coordination Polymers
Eindhoven University of Technology, 2015
Printing: Ridderprint BV, the Netherlands
Cover: ‘’Jardine Media’’, Ridderprint BV
A catalogue record is available from the Eindhoven University of Technology Library
ISBN: 978-‐90-‐386-‐3946-‐8
This work has been financially supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, Chemical Sciences (NWO-‐CW).
Copyright © 2015 by Abidin Balan
Table of Contents
Chapter 1 Introduction: Polymer Mechanochemistry .............................................................................. 1
History and background ................................................................................................................. 2 Mechanophores ............................................................................................................................. 7 Mechanoresponsive materials ....................................................................................................... 9 Mechanical release of small molecules in polymer matrices ....................................................... 11 Mechanochemical catalysis .......................................................................................................... 13 Aim and outline of this thesis ....................................................................................................... 16 References .................................................................................................................................... 18
Chapter 2 Mechanochemical chain scission in NHC-‐Pd centered coordination polymers ....................... 21
Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 22 Results and Discussions ................................................................................................................ 24 Synthesis ....................................................................................................................................... 24 Chain Scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 ............................................................................................. 26 Determination of limiting molecular weight Mlim ......................................................................... 29 Scission Rates for M(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 ............................................................................................. 32 Chain scission mechanism ............................................................................................................ 39 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 43 Experimental ................................................................................................................................ 44 References .................................................................................................................................... 46
Chapter 3 Mechanical scission of Pd(NHC)2Cl2 complexes probed with chemiluminescence .................. 49
Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 50 2-‐Coumaranones .......................................................................................................................... 51 Results and discussions ................................................................................................................ 52 Chain scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes in the presence of coumaranone ...................... 52 Light emission ............................................................................................................................... 58 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 63 Experimental ................................................................................................................................ 64 References .................................................................................................................................... 66
Abidin Balan
Mechanochemical Scission of Transition Metal-‐Ligand Bonds in Coordination Polymers
Eindhoven University of Technology, 2015
Printing: Ridderprint BV, the Netherlands
Cover: ‘’Jardine Media’’, Ridderprint BV
A catalogue record is available from the Eindhoven University of Technology Library
ISBN: 978-‐90-‐386-‐3946-‐8
This work has been financially supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, Chemical Sciences (NWO-‐CW).
Copyright © 2015 by Abidin Balan
Table of Contents
Chapter 1 Introduction: Polymer Mechanochemistry .............................................................................. 1
History and background ................................................................................................................. 2 Mechanophores ............................................................................................................................. 7 Mechanoresponsive materials ....................................................................................................... 9 Mechanical release of small molecules in polymer matrices ....................................................... 11 Mechanochemical catalysis .......................................................................................................... 13 Aim and outline of this thesis ....................................................................................................... 16 References .................................................................................................................................... 18
Chapter 2 Mechanochemical chain scission in NHC-‐Pd centered coordination polymers ....................... 21
Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 22 Results and Discussions ................................................................................................................ 24 Synthesis ....................................................................................................................................... 24 Chain Scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 ............................................................................................. 26 Determination of limiting molecular weight Mlim ......................................................................... 29 Scission Rates for M(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 ............................................................................................. 32 Chain scission mechanism ............................................................................................................ 39 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 43 Experimental ................................................................................................................................ 44 References .................................................................................................................................... 46
Chapter 3 Mechanical scission of Pd(NHC)2Cl2 complexes probed with chemiluminescence .................. 49
Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 50 2-‐Coumaranones .......................................................................................................................... 51 Results and discussions ................................................................................................................ 52 Chain scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes in the presence of coumaranone ...................... 52 Light emission ............................................................................................................................... 58 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 63 Experimental ................................................................................................................................ 64 References .................................................................................................................................... 66
Chapter 4 Determination of ligand exchange dynamics and sonication induced ligand exchange rate in Imidazole-‐Pd centered coordination polymers .................................................................. 69
Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 70 Results and Discussions ................................................................................................................ 73 Synthesis of Pd-‐Imidazole complexes ........................................................................................... 73 Ligand exchange between EtIm and Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 ........................................................................ 75 Sonication induced ligand exchange ............................................................................................ 79 Rate of sonication induced chain scission .................................................................................... 80 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 85 Experimental ................................................................................................................................ 86 References .................................................................................................................................... 88
Chapter 5 Mechanochemically induced, directed ligand exchange in polymeric Pd(II) complexes ......... 89
Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 90 Results and discussions ................................................................................................................ 92 Mechanochemical synthesis of hetero-‐complexes ...................................................................... 95 Mechanochemical synthesis of block copolymers ....................................................................... 96 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 99 Experimental .............................................................................................................................. 100 References .................................................................................................................................. 102
Chapter 6 Transition metal bearing supramolecular polymer networks: Towards self-‐healing applications ........................................................................................................................ 103
Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 104 Results and discussions .............................................................................................................. 106 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................. 109 Experimental .............................................................................................................................. 110 References .................................................................................................................................. 111
Summary ............................................................................................................................ 113
Curriculum Vitae ................................................................................................................. 117
Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ 119
Chapter 1Introduction: Polymer Mechanochemistry
The past 10 years have seen a resurgence of interest in the field of polymer mechanochemis-
try. Whilst the destructive effects of mechanical force on polymer chains have been known
for decades, it was only recently that researchers tapped into these forces to realize more
useful chemical transformations. Current developments in mechanochemistry involve the
introduction of mechanophores in polymer chains that can undergo useful reactions upon
mechanical activation. History and fundamental aspects underlying mechanochemical chain
scission in polymers together with elegant examples from recent literatures were described
in this chapter. At the end the aim and outline of this thesis are given.
Chapter 4 Determination of ligand exchange dynamics and sonication induced ligand exchange rate in Imidazole-‐Pd centered coordination polymers .................................................................. 69
Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 70 Results and Discussions ................................................................................................................ 73 Synthesis of Pd-‐Imidazole complexes ........................................................................................... 73 Ligand exchange between EtIm and Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 ........................................................................ 75 Sonication induced ligand exchange ............................................................................................ 79 Rate of sonication induced chain scission .................................................................................... 80 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 85 Experimental ................................................................................................................................ 86 References .................................................................................................................................... 88
Chapter 5 Mechanochemically induced, directed ligand exchange in polymeric Pd(II) complexes ......... 89
Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 90 Results and discussions ................................................................................................................ 92 Mechanochemical synthesis of hetero-‐complexes ...................................................................... 95 Mechanochemical synthesis of block copolymers ....................................................................... 96 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 99 Experimental .............................................................................................................................. 100 References .................................................................................................................................. 102
Chapter 6 Transition metal bearing supramolecular polymer networks: Towards self-‐healing applications ........................................................................................................................ 103
Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 104 Results and discussions .............................................................................................................. 106 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................. 109 Experimental .............................................................................................................................. 110 References .................................................................................................................................. 111
Summary ............................................................................................................................ 113
Curriculum Vitae ................................................................................................................. 117
Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ 119
History and background
Mechanical activation of chemical bonds offers an alternative to conventional processes
such as thermal or photochemical activation.1 As stated by Kauzmann and Eyring,2
mechanical work done by an external force (W(r) = F × r) modifies the Morse potential (U’(r)
= U(r) – W(r)) and lowers the energy barrier for bond dissociation to such an extent that
thermal fluctuations can exceed this barrier at room temperature, in contrast to the
unstretched bond.3,4
Figure 1: Morse energy potentials representing a chemical bond in unperturbed state (dash-‐dotted
line) and of a bond under stress (solid line) showing the mechanochemical activation of bond
according to the TABS theory. The energy input due to mechanical work is shown as a dashed line.4
Polymer mechanochemistry was first described by Staudinger in the 1930s, when he
interpreted the decrease in molecular weight upon mastication of a polymer as the
mechanical rupture of macromolecules.5 Since then, the use of force to activate chemical
bonds and to initiate chemical reactions in polymers has become of interest because the
reaction pathways and outcome of a mechanochemical reaction can be completely different
from its thermal analogue. For instance, thermal ring-‐opening reaction of cyclobutanes
(CBs), an orbital-‐controlled reaction, is only allowed via a conrotatory pathway, yielding a
different isomer of the ring-‐opened product (E,Z or E,E) depending on the starting isomer
(cis-‐ or trans-‐CB, respectively). However, when activated by mechanical force, regardless of
the starting isomer, the ring-‐opening always yields the E,E isomer as a product. This
intriguing difference between the outcomes of mechanical and thermal reactions is a result
of the fact that mechanical work involved with force, in contrast to thermal energy, is
anisotropic (i.e. force has a direction).6–10
Figure 2: Electrocyclic ring opening of benzocyclobutenes. The intermediate resulting from the
electrocyclic ring opening of benzocyclobutenes depends on the method of activation and on the
geometry of the molecule.6
Nature also uses mechanochemistry, for instance, in the regulation of the activity of some
enzymes and proteins by force-‐induced structural changes. Proteins fold in many different
conformations, which changes the activity of enzymes associated to them. The free energy
difference between folded and unfolded states is usually lower than energy of a covalent
bond and this makes it possible to ‘force’ the protein into a different conformation and alter
its enzymatic activity even with low stress loadings.11 Klibanov et al. have investigated the
effect of mechanical stretching on enzyme activity by covalently attaching chymotrypsin and
Chapter 1
2
History and background
Mechanical activation of chemical bonds offers an alternative to conventional processes
such as thermal or photochemical activation.1 As stated by Kauzmann and Eyring,2
mechanical work done by an external force (W(r) = F × r) modifies the Morse potential (U’(r)
= U(r) – W(r)) and lowers the energy barrier for bond dissociation to such an extent that
thermal fluctuations can exceed this barrier at room temperature, in contrast to the
unstretched bond.3,4
Figure 1: Morse energy potentials representing a chemical bond in unperturbed state (dash-‐dotted
line) and of a bond under stress (solid line) showing the mechanochemical activation of bond
according to the TABS theory. The energy input due to mechanical work is shown as a dashed line.4
Polymer mechanochemistry was first described by Staudinger in the 1930s, when he
interpreted the decrease in molecular weight upon mastication of a polymer as the
mechanical rupture of macromolecules.5 Since then, the use of force to activate chemical
bonds and to initiate chemical reactions in polymers has become of interest because the
reaction pathways and outcome of a mechanochemical reaction can be completely different
from its thermal analogue. For instance, thermal ring-‐opening reaction of cyclobutanes
(CBs), an orbital-‐controlled reaction, is only allowed via a conrotatory pathway, yielding a
different isomer of the ring-‐opened product (E,Z or E,E) depending on the starting isomer
(cis-‐ or trans-‐CB, respectively). However, when activated by mechanical force, regardless of
the starting isomer, the ring-‐opening always yields the E,E isomer as a product. This
intriguing difference between the outcomes of mechanical and thermal reactions is a result
of the fact that mechanical work involved with force, in contrast to thermal energy, is
anisotropic (i.e. force has a direction).6–10
Figure 2: Electrocyclic ring opening of benzocyclobutenes. The intermediate resulting from the
electrocyclic ring opening of benzocyclobutenes depends on the method of activation and on the
geometry of the molecule.6
Nature also uses mechanochemistry, for instance, in the regulation of the activity of some
enzymes and proteins by force-‐induced structural changes. Proteins fold in many different
conformations, which changes the activity of enzymes associated to them. The free energy
difference between folded and unfolded states is usually lower than energy of a covalent
bond and this makes it possible to ‘force’ the protein into a different conformation and alter
its enzymatic activity even with low stress loadings.11 Klibanov et al. have investigated the
effect of mechanical stretching on enzyme activity by covalently attaching chymotrypsin and
Polymer Mechanochemistry
3
1
trypsin to nylon, human hair, and viscose fibers.12 They showed that stretching of these
polymer supports induced a deformation on protein molecules and so a 3-‐fold decrease in
enzyme activity. Upon relaxation, the initial level of activity was reached instantaneously
revealing that enzyme activity can be altered reversibly by stretch-‐relax process.
Figure 3: Dependence of relative activity of enzymes covalently bound to different elastic supports
on the degree of stretching of the supports. (a) chymotrypsin on protein coated nylon fiber; (b)
trypsin on human hair; (c) chymotrypsin on viscose (cellulose) fiber. Schematic representation of the
deformation of enzyme bound to a mechanically stretched elastic fiber.12
One of the most efficient ways to exert force on a polymer in solution is by the use of
sonication since the strain rates accessible with sonochemistry are greater than those with
other solution-‐based flow techniques such as opposed jets or cross slots, allowing
mechanical activation to be obtained in polymers of lower molecular weight and at greater
scission rates.13 Upon sonication of solution, cavitation leads to strong elongational stresses
around collapsing bubbles.14 The part of the polymer chain closest to the collapsing bubble
wall is pulled at a higher velocity than the far end, and this velocity gradient creates stress
along the backbone. This force is accumulated through the polymer backbone and reaches a
maximum value at the center of the chain because the flow field is centrosymmetric with
respect to the molecule. As a consequence chain scission occurs preferentially around the
chain midpoint.15
Figure 4: Mechanism for ultrasound-‐induced polymer chain scission: (a) gradual bubble formation
results from pressure variations induced by the acoustic field; (b) rapid bubble collapse generates
solvodynamic shear; (c) small molecules undergo pyrolytic cleavage to form radical byproducts upon
bubble collapse, while polymer chains do not undergo pyrolytic cleavage because they do not
penetrate the bubble interface.13
Implosion of cavitation bubbles is essentially an adiabatic process, which leads to formation
of local hotspots within the bubble in which temperature and pressure increase drastically.
The content of cavitation bubble pyrolyzes under these extreme conditions and results in
formation of reactive species, such as radicals and persistent, protic secondary
byproducts.16. Recent studies in our group have shown that heat capacity of gas dissolved in
solution influences the formation of sonochemical impurities. For instance, the use of
methane (CH4) instead of argon (Ar) decreases the production of radicals significantly.17
Higher heat capacity and possible energy dissipation due to increased degrees of freedom in
CH4, compared to those of monoatomic Ar, decrease the temperature in hotspots and
suppress the reactive impurity formation. On the other hand, solubility of the saturation gas
may also have a negative influence on ultrasound induced mechanical chain scission. Iso-‐
Chapter 1
4
trypsin to nylon, human hair, and viscose fibers.12 They showed that stretching of these
polymer supports induced a deformation on protein molecules and so a 3-‐fold decrease in
enzyme activity. Upon relaxation, the initial level of activity was reached instantaneously
revealing that enzyme activity can be altered reversibly by stretch-‐relax process.
Figure 3: Dependence of relative activity of enzymes covalently bound to different elastic supports
on the degree of stretching of the supports. (a) chymotrypsin on protein coated nylon fiber; (b)
trypsin on human hair; (c) chymotrypsin on viscose (cellulose) fiber. Schematic representation of the
deformation of enzyme bound to a mechanically stretched elastic fiber.12
One of the most efficient ways to exert force on a polymer in solution is by the use of
sonication since the strain rates accessible with sonochemistry are greater than those with
other solution-‐based flow techniques such as opposed jets or cross slots, allowing
mechanical activation to be obtained in polymers of lower molecular weight and at greater
scission rates.13 Upon sonication of solution, cavitation leads to strong elongational stresses
around collapsing bubbles.14 The part of the polymer chain closest to the collapsing bubble
wall is pulled at a higher velocity than the far end, and this velocity gradient creates stress
along the backbone. This force is accumulated through the polymer backbone and reaches a
maximum value at the center of the chain because the flow field is centrosymmetric with
respect to the molecule. As a consequence chain scission occurs preferentially around the
chain midpoint.15
Figure 4: Mechanism for ultrasound-‐induced polymer chain scission: (a) gradual bubble formation
results from pressure variations induced by the acoustic field; (b) rapid bubble collapse generates
solvodynamic shear; (c) small molecules undergo pyrolytic cleavage to form radical byproducts upon
bubble collapse, while polymer chains do not undergo pyrolytic cleavage because they do not
penetrate the bubble interface.13
Implosion of cavitation bubbles is essentially an adiabatic process, which leads to formation
of local hotspots within the bubble in which temperature and pressure increase drastically.
The content of cavitation bubble pyrolyzes under these extreme conditions and results in
formation of reactive species, such as radicals and persistent, protic secondary
byproducts.16. Recent studies in our group have shown that heat capacity of gas dissolved in
solution influences the formation of sonochemical impurities. For instance, the use of
methane (CH4) instead of argon (Ar) decreases the production of radicals significantly.17
Higher heat capacity and possible energy dissipation due to increased degrees of freedom in
CH4, compared to those of monoatomic Ar, decrease the temperature in hotspots and
suppress the reactive impurity formation. On the other hand, solubility of the saturation gas
may also have a negative influence on ultrasound induced mechanical chain scission. Iso-‐
Polymer Mechanochemistry
5
1
butane, for instance, a gas with higher solubility decreases the intensity of cavitation effects
so it leads to lower scission rates. Therefore, the selection of saturation gas is crucial for
both scission rate and sonochemical impurity formation.
Figure 5: Radical production rate and percentage scission of supramolecular polymer complex
Ag(NHC7k)2PF6 after 5 min of sonication using argon, nitrogen, methane and isobutane as saturation
gases.17
It is well established that mechanochemical scission of polymers only occurs above a
molecular weight threshold (Mlim).18 Below Mlim, no scission takes place since polymer
chains are too short to accumulate the force required to break chemical bonds.19 The rate of
mechanically induced scission in covalent polymers has been shown to be proportional to
[MW -‐ Mlim] when the initial molecular weight is greater than Mlim.4,20 Madras recently
reported that the chain scission rate coefficient ksc is linearly dependent on the initial
molecular weight of polymers based on experimental data for ultrasonic chain scission of a
number of polymers, including poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), polyacrylamide (PAa), poly(butyl
acrylate) (PBA), and poly(methyl acrylate) (PMA). ksc is assumed to follow empirical formula;
ksc = kd (MW -‐ Mlim )λ
where kd is the degradation coefficient, MW is the initial molecular weight of the polymer,
Mlim is the limiting molecular weight, and the exponent λ is a value between 0 and 3. When
λ = 1, the experimental data was fitted to the theory by linear regression.21
Mechanophores
Limiting molecular weight (Mlim) and the rate of chain scission (ksc) are influenced
significantly if a mechanically responsive labile bond, mechanophore, is incorporated into a
polymer chain. Encina et. al. found that the ksc of poly(vinylpyrrolidone) increased 10-‐fold
when peroxide linkages were randomly incorporated into the polymer backbone. The
peroxide bond with bond dissociation energy of 51 kcal/mol is much weaker than the C-‐C
(88 kcal/mol) and the C-‐O (91 kcal/mol) bonds and makes the polymer susceptible to
mechanical energy input.22
Furthermore, the polymer with a mechanophore can be degraded at specific locations since
mechanical energy is selective for the weakest bond on mechanophore. Moore and co-‐
workers synthesized a linear PEG with a single weak azo link positioned at the center of the
chain. They demonstrated that the mechanically induced cleavage was localized almost
exclusively to the homolytic extrusion of nitrogen from the azo group since the energy of
activation for this process is 24-‐ 30 kcal/mol, much lower than that of the C-‐C and C-‐O bonds
in the PEG backbone.23
Chapter 1
6
butane, for instance, a gas with higher solubility decreases the intensity of cavitation effects
so it leads to lower scission rates. Therefore, the selection of saturation gas is crucial for
both scission rate and sonochemical impurity formation.
Figure 5: Radical production rate and percentage scission of supramolecular polymer complex
Ag(NHC7k)2PF6 after 5 min of sonication using argon, nitrogen, methane and isobutane as saturation
gases.17
It is well established that mechanochemical scission of polymers only occurs above a
molecular weight threshold (Mlim).18 Below Mlim, no scission takes place since polymer
chains are too short to accumulate the force required to break chemical bonds.19 The rate of
mechanically induced scission in covalent polymers has been shown to be proportional to
[MW -‐ Mlim] when the initial molecular weight is greater than Mlim.4,20 Madras recently
reported that the chain scission rate coefficient ksc is linearly dependent on the initial
molecular weight of polymers based on experimental data for ultrasonic chain scission of a
number of polymers, including poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), polyacrylamide (PAa), poly(butyl
acrylate) (PBA), and poly(methyl acrylate) (PMA). ksc is assumed to follow empirical formula;
ksc = kd (MW -‐ Mlim )λ
where kd is the degradation coefficient, MW is the initial molecular weight of the polymer,
Mlim is the limiting molecular weight, and the exponent λ is a value between 0 and 3. When
λ = 1, the experimental data was fitted to the theory by linear regression.21
Mechanophores
Limiting molecular weight (Mlim) and the rate of chain scission (ksc) are influenced
significantly if a mechanically responsive labile bond, mechanophore, is incorporated into a
polymer chain. Encina et. al. found that the ksc of poly(vinylpyrrolidone) increased 10-‐fold
when peroxide linkages were randomly incorporated into the polymer backbone. The
peroxide bond with bond dissociation energy of 51 kcal/mol is much weaker than the C-‐C
(88 kcal/mol) and the C-‐O (91 kcal/mol) bonds and makes the polymer susceptible to
mechanical energy input.22
Furthermore, the polymer with a mechanophore can be degraded at specific locations since
mechanical energy is selective for the weakest bond on mechanophore. Moore and co-‐
workers synthesized a linear PEG with a single weak azo link positioned at the center of the
chain. They demonstrated that the mechanically induced cleavage was localized almost
exclusively to the homolytic extrusion of nitrogen from the azo group since the energy of
activation for this process is 24-‐ 30 kcal/mol, much lower than that of the C-‐C and C-‐O bonds
in the PEG backbone.23
Polymer Mechanochemistry
7
1
Figure 6: Examples of mechanophores incorporated into polymer chains. A) Poly(vinylpyrrolidone)
with random peroxide linkages.22 B) Chain scission of silver-‐carbene-‐based polymer upon sonication
and subsequent trapping of the carbene with water.24 C) Ultrasound-‐Induced cleavage of dicyano-‐
substituted cyclobutane ring yields cyanoacrylate-‐terminated polymers.25 D) Mechanochemical
scission of heteronuclear supramolecular polymers in the presence of a scavenger complex resulted
in the formation of Palladium and Platinum heterocomplexes.26
Coordination bonds, weaker than covalent bonds on polymer backbone break more easiliy
and result in even lower Mlim compared to their covalent counterparts.26 Recently in our
group, high-‐molecular-‐weight linear coordination polymers of diphenylphosphine telechelic
polytetrahydrofuran with palladium(II) dichloride were developed.27 Molecular weights of
these polymers could be altered reversibly by ultrasound and it has been shown that
polytetrahydrofuran chains remain intact during sonication.28 This implies that only the
reversible palladium–phosphorus bonds are broken and coordinatively unsaturated
palladium complexes were produced by the application of mechanical forces on these
coordination polymers.29 Furthermore, polymers which include both PdII and PtII were
OO
OO
N N NO O O
m n x
NN pTHF*OMe
Ag⁺0X*
N N pTHF*OMe
ultrasound
NN pTHF*OMe
NN pTHF*OMe
H₂O
H
+
+0AgX
X:0Cl*0or0PF₆*
X:0AgCl₂0or0PF₆Mn0(pTHF):06.70kDA
BrO
O
O
OO
Br
O O
O
OOOON N
n n
ultrasound
BrO
O
OO
nO
ON
CH₃CN,06*90KC
Pd Pt pTHFpTHFpTHF
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cly
n
C₁₂H₂₅ Pd C₁₂H₂₅
Cl
Cl
ultrasoundPt0Scission
Pd0Scission
Pt C₁₂H₂₅
Cl
Cl
C₁₂H₂₅ Pt
Cl
Cl
pTHF pTHF
Pd C₁₂H₂₅
Cl
Cl
C₁₂H₂₅ Pd
Cl
Cl
pTHF pTHF
A)
B)
C)
D)
x
sonicated and shown that force selectively breaks the weaker Pd-‐Phosphine bonds which
were randomly distributed along the polymer backbone.26
Following the work on metal–phosphine coordination polymers, our group started
investigating mechanical dissociation of silver(I)-‐coordination complexes with N-‐heterocyclic
carbene (NHC) functionalized polymers.24 Groote et al. investigated mechanochemical
scission of metal-‐ligand bonds in Ag(NHC)2 supramolecular polymer complexes by
ultrasound using viscosity measurements and molecular dynamics simulations (MD)
combined with constrained geometry optimization calculations (COGEF).4 Calculations
indicated that the force required to break metal−ligand bond is between 400 and 500 pN,
much lower than the force that is typically required to break covalent bonds (several nN). It
has been shown that polymers with a Ag(NHC)2 coordination complex in the pTHF main
chain have significantly lower Mlim values.16
Mechanoresponsive materials
Mechanical activation of chemical bonds on polymers promises to provide opportunities to
detect and repair damage in polymeric materials. Incorporation of mechanophores into
polymers results in materials sensitive to mechanical stimuli and leads to useful molecular
transformations under stress. In solution, mechanically induced chain scission has been
used to release reactive end groups such as cyanoacrylates25 and trifluorovinyl ethers30 from
mechanophore precursors. Furthermore, transition metal complexes located in the center
of polymer chains have been dissociated by breaking the coordination bonds mechanically,
as an alternative to thermal activation for latent catalysts.1,31,32
An inspiring example of mechanically induced transformations on polymeric materials was
reported recently for the mechanochromic spiropyran (SP) to merocyanine (MC) transition.
Initially by ultrasound and later by the tensile experiments on elastomeric materials, it was
shown that the colorless SP is ring-‐opened to form the red MC dye upon mechanical
activation.8,33 Therefore, linear or crosslinked SP-‐functionalized PMA matrix changes its
color before failure upon stretching. In later studies, SP-‐based mechanochromic probes
were embedded in polyurethanes and polycaprolactone to monitor the effect of
temperature and plasticizers.25,34,35
Chapter 1
8
Figure 6: Examples of mechanophores incorporated into polymer chains. A) Poly(vinylpyrrolidone)
with random peroxide linkages.22 B) Chain scission of silver-‐carbene-‐based polymer upon sonication
and subsequent trapping of the carbene with water.24 C) Ultrasound-‐Induced cleavage of dicyano-‐
substituted cyclobutane ring yields cyanoacrylate-‐terminated polymers.25 D) Mechanochemical
scission of heteronuclear supramolecular polymers in the presence of a scavenger complex resulted
in the formation of Palladium and Platinum heterocomplexes.26
Coordination bonds, weaker than covalent bonds on polymer backbone break more easiliy
and result in even lower Mlim compared to their covalent counterparts.26 Recently in our
group, high-‐molecular-‐weight linear coordination polymers of diphenylphosphine telechelic
polytetrahydrofuran with palladium(II) dichloride were developed.27 Molecular weights of
these polymers could be altered reversibly by ultrasound and it has been shown that
polytetrahydrofuran chains remain intact during sonication.28 This implies that only the
reversible palladium–phosphorus bonds are broken and coordinatively unsaturated
palladium complexes were produced by the application of mechanical forces on these
coordination polymers.29 Furthermore, polymers which include both PdII and PtII were
OO
OO
N N NO O O
m n x
NN pTHF*OMe
Ag⁺0X*
N N pTHF*OMe
ultrasound
NN pTHF*OMe
NN pTHF*OMe
H₂O
H
+
+0AgX
X:0Cl*0or0PF₆*
X:0AgCl₂0or0PF₆Mn0(pTHF):06.70kDA
BrO
O
O
OO
Br
O O
O
OOOON N
n n
ultrasound
BrO
O
OO
nO
ON
CH₃CN,06*90KC
Pd Pt pTHFpTHFpTHF
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cly
n
C₁₂H₂₅ Pd C₁₂H₂₅
Cl
Cl
ultrasoundPt0Scission
Pd0Scission
Pt C₁₂H₂₅
Cl
Cl
C₁₂H₂₅ Pt
Cl
Cl
pTHF pTHF
Pd C₁₂H₂₅
Cl
Cl
C₁₂H₂₅ Pd
Cl
Cl
pTHF pTHF
A)
B)
C)
D)
x
sonicated and shown that force selectively breaks the weaker Pd-‐Phosphine bonds which
were randomly distributed along the polymer backbone.26
Following the work on metal–phosphine coordination polymers, our group started
investigating mechanical dissociation of silver(I)-‐coordination complexes with N-‐heterocyclic
carbene (NHC) functionalized polymers.24 Groote et al. investigated mechanochemical
scission of metal-‐ligand bonds in Ag(NHC)2 supramolecular polymer complexes by
ultrasound using viscosity measurements and molecular dynamics simulations (MD)
combined with constrained geometry optimization calculations (COGEF).4 Calculations
indicated that the force required to break metal−ligand bond is between 400 and 500 pN,
much lower than the force that is typically required to break covalent bonds (several nN). It
has been shown that polymers with a Ag(NHC)2 coordination complex in the pTHF main
chain have significantly lower Mlim values.16
Mechanoresponsive materials
Mechanical activation of chemical bonds on polymers promises to provide opportunities to
detect and repair damage in polymeric materials. Incorporation of mechanophores into
polymers results in materials sensitive to mechanical stimuli and leads to useful molecular
transformations under stress. In solution, mechanically induced chain scission has been
used to release reactive end groups such as cyanoacrylates25 and trifluorovinyl ethers30 from
mechanophore precursors. Furthermore, transition metal complexes located in the center
of polymer chains have been dissociated by breaking the coordination bonds mechanically,
as an alternative to thermal activation for latent catalysts.1,31,32
An inspiring example of mechanically induced transformations on polymeric materials was
reported recently for the mechanochromic spiropyran (SP) to merocyanine (MC) transition.
Initially by ultrasound and later by the tensile experiments on elastomeric materials, it was
shown that the colorless SP is ring-‐opened to form the red MC dye upon mechanical
activation.8,33 Therefore, linear or crosslinked SP-‐functionalized PMA matrix changes its
color before failure upon stretching. In later studies, SP-‐based mechanochromic probes
were embedded in polyurethanes and polycaprolactone to monitor the effect of
temperature and plasticizers.25,34,35
Polymer Mechanochemistry
9
1
Figure 7: Examples of mechanoresponsive materials in recent literature: A) Mechanochromism:
force-‐induced ring-‐opening of spyropyran to merocyanine;33 B) Mechanoluminescence: polymers
containing bis(adamantyl)-‐1,2-‐dioxetane mechanophores emit light upon stretching.36
Another elegant example as a potential stress reporter, a mechano-‐luminescent material
based on a polymer-‐functionalized 1,2-‐dioxetane moiety, has been developed recently in
our group.36 Dioxetanes are organic peroxides and efficient sources of electronically excited
products upon chemical or thermal treatment.37 Opening of a four-‐membered 1,2-‐
dioxetane ring with two adjacent oxygen atoms yields two carbonyl groups, one of which is
in an electronically excited state and emits a photon (at 420 nm) on relaxation.
Bis(adamantyl)-‐substituted 1,2-‐dioxetane is thermally stable at room temperature (up to
~200 C) with a scission barrier of 37 kcal/mol, 36,38 and was successfully activated
mechanically by covalent incorporation in poly(methylacrylate) chains. Experiments have
shown that dioxetanes can be used as mechanical-‐probe for spatiotemporal mapping and
chain scission in polymers.
Mechanical release of small molecules in polymer matrices
The proliferation of mechanophores capable of producing useful reactive intermediates
within the polymer main chain has prompted others to investigate different modes of
chemically productive mechanical reactivity. One such mode is the mechanically induced
release of small molecules, a recent addition to the mechanochemistry field.
Mechanophores are incorporated into elastomeric networks and an applied force leads to
conformational changes and subsequent scission of bonds that are not part of the polymer
backbone, whilst maintaining the overall mechanical integrity of the polymer matrix.39 The
range of accessible reactivities remains limited, but researchers in this fledgling area are
starting to make use of the small molecule products for further reactions, including
polymerisation. This type of activation displays potential for applications in
mechanochemical catalysis, mapping deformations and damages in polymer networks and
self-‐healing or self-‐reinforcing elastomers.40
The first example of this type of activation was the mechanochemical generation of an acid,
developed by Diesendruck et al. Inspired by Craig’s gDHC system, they incorporated gem-‐
dichlorotetrahydro cyclopropanated indene into polymethyl acrylate matrix (PMA) and
showed that compression resulted in ring opening of cyclopropane to give the elimination
product 2-‐ chloronaphthalene, with the release of HCl.41 Calorimetric analysis of the sample
before and after compression demonstrated that up to 20% mechanophore conversion was
achieved at a load of 352 MPa. Control polymer in which the mechanophore was not
covalently incorporated into the PMA matrix showed 6% conversion under the same
conditions. Although significantly high thermal background reaction observed with control
polymer might limit its practical applications, this work represented an important step
towards the realization of autonomous self-‐healing materials.
Reports have also emerged from the Boydston group describing the flex, or bond-‐bending,
activation of an oxanorbornadiene, a Diels–Alder adduct of furan and dimethyl
acetylenedicarboxylate.42 They incorporated the mechanophore into poly(methyl acrylate)
(PMA) matrix and showed that the furan derivative could be released via a retro-‐[4+2]
cycloaddition under stress applied to the bulk polymer. The mechanically initiated
cycloreversion converts main-‐chain alkene moieties into alkynes and results in linearization
Chapter 1
10
Figure 7: Examples of mechanoresponsive materials in recent literature: A) Mechanochromism:
force-‐induced ring-‐opening of spyropyran to merocyanine;33 B) Mechanoluminescence: polymers
containing bis(adamantyl)-‐1,2-‐dioxetane mechanophores emit light upon stretching.36
Another elegant example as a potential stress reporter, a mechano-‐luminescent material
based on a polymer-‐functionalized 1,2-‐dioxetane moiety, has been developed recently in
our group.36 Dioxetanes are organic peroxides and efficient sources of electronically excited
products upon chemical or thermal treatment.37 Opening of a four-‐membered 1,2-‐
dioxetane ring with two adjacent oxygen atoms yields two carbonyl groups, one of which is
in an electronically excited state and emits a photon (at 420 nm) on relaxation.
Bis(adamantyl)-‐substituted 1,2-‐dioxetane is thermally stable at room temperature (up to
~200 C) with a scission barrier of 37 kcal/mol, 36,38 and was successfully activated
mechanically by covalent incorporation in poly(methylacrylate) chains. Experiments have
shown that dioxetanes can be used as mechanical-‐probe for spatiotemporal mapping and
chain scission in polymers.
Mechanical release of small molecules in polymer matrices
The proliferation of mechanophores capable of producing useful reactive intermediates
within the polymer main chain has prompted others to investigate different modes of
chemically productive mechanical reactivity. One such mode is the mechanically induced
release of small molecules, a recent addition to the mechanochemistry field.
Mechanophores are incorporated into elastomeric networks and an applied force leads to
conformational changes and subsequent scission of bonds that are not part of the polymer
backbone, whilst maintaining the overall mechanical integrity of the polymer matrix.39 The
range of accessible reactivities remains limited, but researchers in this fledgling area are
starting to make use of the small molecule products for further reactions, including
polymerisation. This type of activation displays potential for applications in
mechanochemical catalysis, mapping deformations and damages in polymer networks and
self-‐healing or self-‐reinforcing elastomers.40
The first example of this type of activation was the mechanochemical generation of an acid,
developed by Diesendruck et al. Inspired by Craig’s gDHC system, they incorporated gem-‐
dichlorotetrahydro cyclopropanated indene into polymethyl acrylate matrix (PMA) and
showed that compression resulted in ring opening of cyclopropane to give the elimination
product 2-‐ chloronaphthalene, with the release of HCl.41 Calorimetric analysis of the sample
before and after compression demonstrated that up to 20% mechanophore conversion was
achieved at a load of 352 MPa. Control polymer in which the mechanophore was not
covalently incorporated into the PMA matrix showed 6% conversion under the same
conditions. Although significantly high thermal background reaction observed with control
polymer might limit its practical applications, this work represented an important step
towards the realization of autonomous self-‐healing materials.
Reports have also emerged from the Boydston group describing the flex, or bond-‐bending,
activation of an oxanorbornadiene, a Diels–Alder adduct of furan and dimethyl
acetylenedicarboxylate.42 They incorporated the mechanophore into poly(methyl acrylate)
(PMA) matrix and showed that the furan derivative could be released via a retro-‐[4+2]
cycloaddition under stress applied to the bulk polymer. The mechanically initiated
cycloreversion converts main-‐chain alkene moieties into alkynes and results in linearization
Polymer Mechanochemistry
11
1
that occurs during polymer elongation. After compression the polymer was soaked in
dichloromethane and the small molecules released mechanically diffused out of the matrix;
they could then be identified by and monitored with GC-‐MS and NMR. However, the forces
required to activate the mechanophore caused failure in the PMA matrix, limiting the
number of loading cycles. In a second publication, the authors partly addressed this issue by
incorporating the same mechanophore in a segmented PU matrix which required lower
stress loadings for successive mechanophore activation.43 Nevertheless, as a result of
random scission of the chemical crosslinks and the destruction of physical crosslinks within
the hard domains of the segmented PU matrix, only a maximum of 7% mechanophore
activation could be reached after 15 compression cycles.
Figure 8: Mechanical release of small molecules in polymer matrices: A) Potential indole-‐based
mechanocatalyst for acid generation.41 B) Solid state mechanoactivation of oxanorbornadiene,
producing an alkyne in the polymer backbone and releasing a small molecule furan.42
A)
B)
Mechanochemical catalysis
Mechanocatalysts are catalysts of which the activity or specificity is modified under the
influence of mechanical force. Two distinct modes of activation can be envisioned: steric
modification or unblocking of active sites. In steric activation, the activity of the catalyst is
modified by a change in the steric environment of the active site, e.g. by changing the
relative position of catalytically active groups that form the active site or by changing the
configuration of the binding site. Recently, research investigating the effect of a
photochemical switch coupled to a chelating bisphosphine on the activity profile of the
catalyst was published. The photochemical switch, a biindane, changes the bite angle of the
chelating ligand, and influences the enantioselectivity of reactions catalysed by Pd
complexes of the photoresponsive ligand. It was found that the effect of switching was
largest for Heck arylation reactions.44
The second and the more common approach to mechanocatalysis in synthetic systems is to
activate a catalyst by modifying its electronic properties. Catalysts in a latent state because
of pairing of acidic and basic sites are well known for their capability to be activated
thermally, and are employed in a number of different reactions. Some of the most striking
examples of this kind of catalysts are N-‐heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs).45 These Lewis bases
have been used as catalysts in various organic transformations, including condensation, 1,2-‐
and 1,4-‐addition, transesterification and ring-‐opening reactions.46,47 Due to their
nucleophilicity they show high reactivity towards various substrates but they can also be
masked in thermally labile precursors.48 NHC−metal complexes have been applied as
thermally latent catalysts in the preparation of a number of polymers, such as
poly(urethane), poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(caprolactone), and poly(amide).49–53
By their nature, latent transition metal (TM) catalysts54,55 with strongly bound ligands can be
adapted to form mechanocatalysts by providing the ligands with ‘handles’ to transfer
mechanical force. These handles can be (linear) polymer chains, which provide drag in a
viscous system that is sheared or undergoes elongational strain, or the ligands can be
connected to a polymer network in an elastic system.
Much of the work done in recent years on polymer mechanochemistry has made use of the
high elongational strain rates observed around collapsing cavitation bubbles in sonicated
Chapter 1
12
that occurs during polymer elongation. After compression the polymer was soaked in
dichloromethane and the small molecules released mechanically diffused out of the matrix;
they could then be identified by and monitored with GC-‐MS and NMR. However, the forces
required to activate the mechanophore caused failure in the PMA matrix, limiting the
number of loading cycles. In a second publication, the authors partly addressed this issue by
incorporating the same mechanophore in a segmented PU matrix which required lower
stress loadings for successive mechanophore activation.43 Nevertheless, as a result of
random scission of the chemical crosslinks and the destruction of physical crosslinks within
the hard domains of the segmented PU matrix, only a maximum of 7% mechanophore
activation could be reached after 15 compression cycles.
Figure 8: Mechanical release of small molecules in polymer matrices: A) Potential indole-‐based
mechanocatalyst for acid generation.41 B) Solid state mechanoactivation of oxanorbornadiene,
producing an alkyne in the polymer backbone and releasing a small molecule furan.42
A)
B)
Mechanochemical catalysis
Mechanocatalysts are catalysts of which the activity or specificity is modified under the
influence of mechanical force. Two distinct modes of activation can be envisioned: steric
modification or unblocking of active sites. In steric activation, the activity of the catalyst is
modified by a change in the steric environment of the active site, e.g. by changing the
relative position of catalytically active groups that form the active site or by changing the
configuration of the binding site. Recently, research investigating the effect of a
photochemical switch coupled to a chelating bisphosphine on the activity profile of the
catalyst was published. The photochemical switch, a biindane, changes the bite angle of the
chelating ligand, and influences the enantioselectivity of reactions catalysed by Pd
complexes of the photoresponsive ligand. It was found that the effect of switching was
largest for Heck arylation reactions.44
The second and the more common approach to mechanocatalysis in synthetic systems is to
activate a catalyst by modifying its electronic properties. Catalysts in a latent state because
of pairing of acidic and basic sites are well known for their capability to be activated
thermally, and are employed in a number of different reactions. Some of the most striking
examples of this kind of catalysts are N-‐heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs).45 These Lewis bases
have been used as catalysts in various organic transformations, including condensation, 1,2-‐
and 1,4-‐addition, transesterification and ring-‐opening reactions.46,47 Due to their
nucleophilicity they show high reactivity towards various substrates but they can also be
masked in thermally labile precursors.48 NHC−metal complexes have been applied as
thermally latent catalysts in the preparation of a number of polymers, such as
poly(urethane), poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(caprolactone), and poly(amide).49–53
By their nature, latent transition metal (TM) catalysts54,55 with strongly bound ligands can be
adapted to form mechanocatalysts by providing the ligands with ‘handles’ to transfer
mechanical force. These handles can be (linear) polymer chains, which provide drag in a
viscous system that is sheared or undergoes elongational strain, or the ligands can be
connected to a polymer network in an elastic system.
Much of the work done in recent years on polymer mechanochemistry has made use of the
high elongational strain rates observed around collapsing cavitation bubbles in sonicated
Polymer Mechanochemistry
13
1
solutions.13 In addition to the distinctive features of sonochemically induced mechanical
reactivity described above, further attention needs to be paid to the sonication conditions in
the case of mechanochemical catalysis, because catalyst lifetime and turnover number may
be reduced by sonochemical byproducts. Therefore, the mechanochemical catalysis should
be performed under a gas that increases the lifetime of the active catalyst while still leading
to strong cavitation as mentioned above.
The concept of mechanochemical activation of a latent catalyst by ultrasound is illustrated
by the mechanochemical scission of metal-‐ligand bonds in Ag(NHC)2 supramolecular
polymer complexes.1,56 External force selectively breaks Ag-‐NHC bonds and yields free NHC
which was used to catalyze the transesterification of benzyl alcohol and vinyl acetate under
sonication.56,57 The complex form of the carbene displayed no activity proving the latency of
the catalyst. Control experiments confirmed that the catalyst was activated mechanically.
After successful application of the concept of mechanocatalysis its generality was tested
with bis-‐NHC ruthenium–alkylidene complex.31 Mechanistic studies revealed that ligand
dissociation is a crucial step in catalyst activation for Ru mediated olefin metathesis
reactions to form coordinatively unsaturated reactive Ru species.58 Among several effective
Ru catalysts bis-‐NHC ruthenium–alkylidene complexes were shown to be latent at ambient
temperature since dissociation of strong Ru-‐NHC bond requires elevated temperatures.59
Piermattei showed that Ru catalysts with pTHF chains attached bis NHC ligands resulted in a
latent metathesis catalyst that can be activated by mechanical force.56 Sonicating a solution
of diethyl diallyl malonate (DEDAM) in the presence of mechanically responsive Ru catalysts
(36 kg mol-‐1) resulted in approximately 20% conversion after 1h. Control experiments were
conducted to prove that catalyst activation is mechanical rather than thermal in nature. A
lower MW analogue of the catalyst (18 kg mol-‐1) showed lower activity due to slower chain
scission rate that decreased the amount of active catalyst formed in the timespan of
sonication. Replacing polymer actuators by butyl chains attached to NHC resulted in a
mechanically silent latent catalyst, showed less than 0.2 % conversion in the presence of
DEDAM after 1h of sonication.
Figure 9: Mechanochemical catalysis: A) Photo-‐mechanoactivation of a palladium catalyst for Heck
arylation B) Mechanically activated catalysts and the corresponding catalytic reactions C)
Mechanoactivation of latent ruthenium catalyst in the solid state, initiating in situ polymerization of
norbornene monomer in response to stress
In a later study, bis-‐NHC ruthenium–alkylidene complex was activated under compressive
strain.60 In order to initiate Ru mediated polymerization of norbornene in solid state,
Chapter 1
14
solutions.13 In addition to the distinctive features of sonochemically induced mechanical
reactivity described above, further attention needs to be paid to the sonication conditions in
the case of mechanochemical catalysis, because catalyst lifetime and turnover number may
be reduced by sonochemical byproducts. Therefore, the mechanochemical catalysis should
be performed under a gas that increases the lifetime of the active catalyst while still leading
to strong cavitation as mentioned above.
The concept of mechanochemical activation of a latent catalyst by ultrasound is illustrated
by the mechanochemical scission of metal-‐ligand bonds in Ag(NHC)2 supramolecular
polymer complexes.1,56 External force selectively breaks Ag-‐NHC bonds and yields free NHC
which was used to catalyze the transesterification of benzyl alcohol and vinyl acetate under
sonication.56,57 The complex form of the carbene displayed no activity proving the latency of
the catalyst. Control experiments confirmed that the catalyst was activated mechanically.
After successful application of the concept of mechanocatalysis its generality was tested
with bis-‐NHC ruthenium–alkylidene complex.31 Mechanistic studies revealed that ligand
dissociation is a crucial step in catalyst activation for Ru mediated olefin metathesis
reactions to form coordinatively unsaturated reactive Ru species.58 Among several effective
Ru catalysts bis-‐NHC ruthenium–alkylidene complexes were shown to be latent at ambient
temperature since dissociation of strong Ru-‐NHC bond requires elevated temperatures.59
Piermattei showed that Ru catalysts with pTHF chains attached bis NHC ligands resulted in a
latent metathesis catalyst that can be activated by mechanical force.56 Sonicating a solution
of diethyl diallyl malonate (DEDAM) in the presence of mechanically responsive Ru catalysts
(36 kg mol-‐1) resulted in approximately 20% conversion after 1h. Control experiments were
conducted to prove that catalyst activation is mechanical rather than thermal in nature. A
lower MW analogue of the catalyst (18 kg mol-‐1) showed lower activity due to slower chain
scission rate that decreased the amount of active catalyst formed in the timespan of
sonication. Replacing polymer actuators by butyl chains attached to NHC resulted in a
mechanically silent latent catalyst, showed less than 0.2 % conversion in the presence of
DEDAM after 1h of sonication.
Figure 9: Mechanochemical catalysis: A) Photo-‐mechanoactivation of a palladium catalyst for Heck
arylation B) Mechanically activated catalysts and the corresponding catalytic reactions C)
Mechanoactivation of latent ruthenium catalyst in the solid state, initiating in situ polymerization of
norbornene monomer in response to stress
In a later study, bis-‐NHC ruthenium–alkylidene complex was activated under compressive
strain.60 In order to initiate Ru mediated polymerization of norbornene in solid state,
Polymer Mechanochemistry
15
1
polymer catalyst (34 kg mol-‐1) and a norbornene monomer were incorporated in a high
molecular weight Poly(tetrahydrofuran) (pTHF) matrix (Mn = 170 kDa, PDI = 1.3) which
provided the physical cross-‐linking through the crystalline domains and allowed
macroscopic forces to be transferred to the metal–ligand bonds. Consecutive compressions
showed that up to 25% of norbornene monomer was polymerized after five loading cycles.
Aim and outline of this thesis
The main aim of this thesis is to gain a better understanding of the fundamental processes
and mechanisms underlying mechanochemical chain scission in organometallic complexes.
Throughout this work, we have used Palladium (II) complexes with N-‐heterocyclic carbene
(NHC) or imidazole ligands. These coordination complexes are embedded within polymer
chains and coordination bonds are broken by ultrasonication or by straining bulk polymer
samples.
In Chapter 2, ultrasound induced chain scission in coordination complexes of Palladium and
Platinum with polytetrahydrofuran functionalized N-‐heterocyclic carbene ligands is
reported. Reversibility of chain scission and molecular weight dependence of scission rate
were determined. Comparing scission of Palladium and Platinum containing polymer
showed the influence of ligand dissociation energy on mechanochemical response of the
coordination polymers.
Scission of the Pd -‐ NHC bond releases free NHC. In Chapter 3, this basic NHC, is used to
abstract a proton from a 2-‐coumaranone derivative, which decomposes via a
chemiluminescent pathway once deprotonated in the presence of oxygen. Rate of
ultrasound induced scission and molecular weight threshold (Mlim) for mechanochemical
chain scission were determined under the reaction conditions that coumaranone
decomposition could be visually monitored.
In Chapter 4, thermal ligand exchange between imidazole Palladium (II) complexes has been
investigated to have a better understanding on ligand exchange dynamics and to determine
the rate of sonication induced ligand exchange in Imidazole-‐Pd coordination polymers.
In Chapter 5, information on the mechanism of mechanochemical chain scission and
mechanochemically induced ligand exchange of Pd(II) complexes, obtained in previous
chapters was used to direct the formation of heterocomplexes. Symmetric complexes with
high and low molecular weight polymer-‐attached ligands were mixed in solution and
sonicated. When one of the complexes has a molecular weight higher than the threshold
(Mlim) for mechanochemical chain scission, while the other is smaller, sonication leads to the
directed formation of a heterocomplex with two different ligands.
In Chapter 6, initial attempts and preliminary results for self-‐healing property of polymer
films of poly(methyl acrylate)-‐vinyl imidazole copolymers, which were crosslinked by ligand
metal coordination were reported. Reversibility of mechanochemical chain scission in
coordination complexes was utilized in the solid state to regain the mechanical properties of
a cross-‐linked polymer film.
Chapter 1
16
polymer catalyst (34 kg mol-‐1) and a norbornene monomer were incorporated in a high
molecular weight Poly(tetrahydrofuran) (pTHF) matrix (Mn = 170 kDa, PDI = 1.3) which
provided the physical cross-‐linking through the crystalline domains and allowed
macroscopic forces to be transferred to the metal–ligand bonds. Consecutive compressions
showed that up to 25% of norbornene monomer was polymerized after five loading cycles.
Aim and outline of this thesis
The main aim of this thesis is to gain a better understanding of the fundamental processes
and mechanisms underlying mechanochemical chain scission in organometallic complexes.
Throughout this work, we have used Palladium (II) complexes with N-‐heterocyclic carbene
(NHC) or imidazole ligands. These coordination complexes are embedded within polymer
chains and coordination bonds are broken by ultrasonication or by straining bulk polymer
samples.
In Chapter 2, ultrasound induced chain scission in coordination complexes of Palladium and
Platinum with polytetrahydrofuran functionalized N-‐heterocyclic carbene ligands is
reported. Reversibility of chain scission and molecular weight dependence of scission rate
were determined. Comparing scission of Palladium and Platinum containing polymer
showed the influence of ligand dissociation energy on mechanochemical response of the
coordination polymers.
Scission of the Pd -‐ NHC bond releases free NHC. In Chapter 3, this basic NHC, is used to
abstract a proton from a 2-‐coumaranone derivative, which decomposes via a
chemiluminescent pathway once deprotonated in the presence of oxygen. Rate of
ultrasound induced scission and molecular weight threshold (Mlim) for mechanochemical
chain scission were determined under the reaction conditions that coumaranone
decomposition could be visually monitored.
In Chapter 4, thermal ligand exchange between imidazole Palladium (II) complexes has been
investigated to have a better understanding on ligand exchange dynamics and to determine
the rate of sonication induced ligand exchange in Imidazole-‐Pd coordination polymers.
In Chapter 5, information on the mechanism of mechanochemical chain scission and
mechanochemically induced ligand exchange of Pd(II) complexes, obtained in previous
chapters was used to direct the formation of heterocomplexes. Symmetric complexes with
high and low molecular weight polymer-‐attached ligands were mixed in solution and
sonicated. When one of the complexes has a molecular weight higher than the threshold
(Mlim) for mechanochemical chain scission, while the other is smaller, sonication leads to the
directed formation of a heterocomplex with two different ligands.
In Chapter 6, initial attempts and preliminary results for self-‐healing property of polymer
films of poly(methyl acrylate)-‐vinyl imidazole copolymers, which were crosslinked by ligand
metal coordination were reported. Reversibility of mechanochemical chain scission in
coordination complexes was utilized in the solid state to regain the mechanical properties of
a cross-‐linked polymer film.
Polymer Mechanochemistry
17
1
References
(1) Karthikeyan, S.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat Chem 2010, 2 (6), 436–437.
(2) Kauzmann, W.; Eyring, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1940, 62 (11), 3113–3125.
(3) Beyer, M. K. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112 (17), 7307–7312.
(4) Groote, R.; Szyja, B. M.; Pidko, E. A.; Hensen, E. J. M.; Sijbesma, R. P. Macromolecules 2011,
44 (23), 9187–9195.
(5) Staudinger, H.; Heuer, W. Berichte Dtsch. Chem. Ges. B Ser. 1934, 67 (7), 1159–1164.
(6) Hickenboth, C. R.; Moore, J. S.; White, S. R.; Sottos, N. R.; Baudry, J.; Wilson, S. R. Nature
2007, 446 (7134), 423–427.
(7) Ong, M. T.; Leiding, J.; Tao, H.; Virshup, A. M.; Martínez, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131 (18),
6377–6379.
(8) Potisek, S. L.; Davis, D. A.; Sottos, N. R.; White, S. R.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129
(45), 13808–13809.
(9) Ribas-‐Arino, J.; Shiga, M.; Marx, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (30), 10609–10614.
(10) Black, A. L.; Orlicki, J. A.; Craig, S. L. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21 (23), 8460–8465.
(11) Zocchi, G. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2009, 38 (1), 75–88.
(12) Klibanov, A. M.; Samokhin, G. P.; Martinek, K.; Berezin, I. V. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA -‐
Enzymol. 1976, 438 (1), 1–12.
(13) Caruso, M. M.; Davis, D. A.; Shen, Q.; Odom, S. A.; Sottos, N. R.; White, S. R.; Moore, J. S.
Chem. Rev. 2009, 109 (11), 5755–5798.
(14) Kuijpers, M. W. A.; Iedema, P. D.; Kemmere, M. F.; Keurentjes, J. T. F. Polymer 2004, 45 (19),
6461–6467.
(15) Odell, J. A.; Muller, A. J.; Narh, K. A.; Keller, A. Macromolecules 1990, 23 (12), 3092–3103.
(16) Rooze, J.; Groote, R.; Jakobs, R. T. M.; Sijbesma, R. P.; van Iersel, M. M.; Rebrov, E. V.;
Schouten, J. C.; Keurentjes, J. T. F. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115 (38), 11038–11043.
(17) Groote, R.; Jakobs, R. T. M.; Sijbesma, R. P. ACS Macro Lett. 2012, 1 (8), 1012–1015.
(18) Nakano, A.; Minoura, Y. Macromolecules 1975, 8 (5), 677–680.
(19) Ribas-‐Arino, J.; Shiga, M.; Marx, D. Chem. – Eur. J. 2009, 15 (48), 13331–13335.
(20) Groote, R.; van Haandel, L.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2012, 50 (23),
4929–4935.
(21) Vijayalakshmi, S. P.; Madras, G. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005, 90 (1), 116–122.
(22) Encina, M. V.; Lissi, E.; Sarasúa, M.; Gargallo, L.; Radic, D. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Lett. Ed. 1980,
18 (12), 757–760.
(23) Berkowski, K. L.; Potisek, S. L.; Hickenboth, C. R.; Moore, J. S. Macromolecules 2005, 38 (22),
8975–8978.
(24) Karthikeyan, S.; Potisek, S. L.; Piermattei, A.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130 (45),
14968–14969.
(25) Kryger, M. J.; Ong, M. T.; Odom, S. A.; Sottos, N. R.; White, S. R.; Martinez, T. J.; Moore, J. S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (13), 4558–4559.
(26) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Chem. Commun. 2008, No. 37, 4416–4418.
(27) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43 (34), 4460–4462.
(28) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Huijbers, J. P. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Macromolecules 2005, 38 (15), 6290–6298.
(29) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2006, 44 (19), 5445–5453.
(30) Klukovich, H. M.; Kean, Z. S.; Iacono, S. T.; Craig, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (44), 17882–
17888.
(31) Jakobs, R. T. M.; Sijbesma, R. P. Organometallics 2012, 31 (6), 2476–2481.
(32) Powell, A. B.; Bielawski, C. W.; Cowley, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (29), 10184–10194.
(33) Davis, D. A.; Hamilton, A.; Yang, J.; Cremar, L. D.; Van Gough, D.; Potisek, S. L.; Ong, M. T.;
Braun, P. V.; Martínez, T. J.; White, S. R.; Moore, J. S.; Sottos, N. R. Nature 2009, 459 (7243),
68–72.
(34) Kingsbury, C. M.; May, P. A.; Davis, D. A.; White, S. R.; Moore, J. S.; Sottos, N. R. J. Mater.
Chem. 2011, 21 (23), 8381–8388.
(35) O’Bryan, G.; Wong, B. M.; McElhanon, J. R. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2 (6), 1594–
1600.
(36) Chen, Y.; Spiering, A. J. H.; Karthikeyan, S.; Peters, G. W. M.; Meijer, E. W.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat.
Chem. 2012, 4 (7), 559–562.
(37) Turro, N. J.; Lechtken, P.; Schore, N. E.; Schuster, G.; Steinmetzer, H. C.; Yekta, A. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1974, 7 (4), 97–105.
(38) Schuster, G. B.; Turro, N. J.; Steinmetzer, H. C.; Schaap, A. P.; Faler, G.; Adam, W.; Liu, J. C. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97 (24), 7110–7118.
(39) Sottos, N. R. Nat. Chem. 2014, 6 (5), 381–383.
(40) Wiggins, K. M.; Brantley, J. N.; Bielawski, C. W. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42 (17), 7130–7147.
(41) Diesendruck, C. E.; Steinberg, B. D.; Sugai, N.; Silberstein, M. N.; Sottos, N. R.; White, S. R.;
Braun, P. V.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134 (30), 12446–12449.
(42) Larsen, M. B.; Boydston, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135 (22), 8189–8192.
(43) Larsen, M. B.; Boydston, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (4), 1276–1279.
Chapter 1
18
References
(1) Karthikeyan, S.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat Chem 2010, 2 (6), 436–437.
(2) Kauzmann, W.; Eyring, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1940, 62 (11), 3113–3125.
(3) Beyer, M. K. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112 (17), 7307–7312.
(4) Groote, R.; Szyja, B. M.; Pidko, E. A.; Hensen, E. J. M.; Sijbesma, R. P. Macromolecules 2011,
44 (23), 9187–9195.
(5) Staudinger, H.; Heuer, W. Berichte Dtsch. Chem. Ges. B Ser. 1934, 67 (7), 1159–1164.
(6) Hickenboth, C. R.; Moore, J. S.; White, S. R.; Sottos, N. R.; Baudry, J.; Wilson, S. R. Nature
2007, 446 (7134), 423–427.
(7) Ong, M. T.; Leiding, J.; Tao, H.; Virshup, A. M.; Martínez, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131 (18),
6377–6379.
(8) Potisek, S. L.; Davis, D. A.; Sottos, N. R.; White, S. R.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129
(45), 13808–13809.
(9) Ribas-‐Arino, J.; Shiga, M.; Marx, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (30), 10609–10614.
(10) Black, A. L.; Orlicki, J. A.; Craig, S. L. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21 (23), 8460–8465.
(11) Zocchi, G. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2009, 38 (1), 75–88.
(12) Klibanov, A. M.; Samokhin, G. P.; Martinek, K.; Berezin, I. V. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA -‐
Enzymol. 1976, 438 (1), 1–12.
(13) Caruso, M. M.; Davis, D. A.; Shen, Q.; Odom, S. A.; Sottos, N. R.; White, S. R.; Moore, J. S.
Chem. Rev. 2009, 109 (11), 5755–5798.
(14) Kuijpers, M. W. A.; Iedema, P. D.; Kemmere, M. F.; Keurentjes, J. T. F. Polymer 2004, 45 (19),
6461–6467.
(15) Odell, J. A.; Muller, A. J.; Narh, K. A.; Keller, A. Macromolecules 1990, 23 (12), 3092–3103.
(16) Rooze, J.; Groote, R.; Jakobs, R. T. M.; Sijbesma, R. P.; van Iersel, M. M.; Rebrov, E. V.;
Schouten, J. C.; Keurentjes, J. T. F. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115 (38), 11038–11043.
(17) Groote, R.; Jakobs, R. T. M.; Sijbesma, R. P. ACS Macro Lett. 2012, 1 (8), 1012–1015.
(18) Nakano, A.; Minoura, Y. Macromolecules 1975, 8 (5), 677–680.
(19) Ribas-‐Arino, J.; Shiga, M.; Marx, D. Chem. – Eur. J. 2009, 15 (48), 13331–13335.
(20) Groote, R.; van Haandel, L.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2012, 50 (23),
4929–4935.
(21) Vijayalakshmi, S. P.; Madras, G. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005, 90 (1), 116–122.
(22) Encina, M. V.; Lissi, E.; Sarasúa, M.; Gargallo, L.; Radic, D. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Lett. Ed. 1980,
18 (12), 757–760.
(23) Berkowski, K. L.; Potisek, S. L.; Hickenboth, C. R.; Moore, J. S. Macromolecules 2005, 38 (22),
8975–8978.
(24) Karthikeyan, S.; Potisek, S. L.; Piermattei, A.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130 (45),
14968–14969.
(25) Kryger, M. J.; Ong, M. T.; Odom, S. A.; Sottos, N. R.; White, S. R.; Martinez, T. J.; Moore, J. S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (13), 4558–4559.
(26) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Chem. Commun. 2008, No. 37, 4416–4418.
(27) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43 (34), 4460–4462.
(28) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Huijbers, J. P. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Macromolecules 2005, 38 (15), 6290–6298.
(29) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2006, 44 (19), 5445–5453.
(30) Klukovich, H. M.; Kean, Z. S.; Iacono, S. T.; Craig, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (44), 17882–
17888.
(31) Jakobs, R. T. M.; Sijbesma, R. P. Organometallics 2012, 31 (6), 2476–2481.
(32) Powell, A. B.; Bielawski, C. W.; Cowley, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (29), 10184–10194.
(33) Davis, D. A.; Hamilton, A.; Yang, J.; Cremar, L. D.; Van Gough, D.; Potisek, S. L.; Ong, M. T.;
Braun, P. V.; Martínez, T. J.; White, S. R.; Moore, J. S.; Sottos, N. R. Nature 2009, 459 (7243),
68–72.
(34) Kingsbury, C. M.; May, P. A.; Davis, D. A.; White, S. R.; Moore, J. S.; Sottos, N. R. J. Mater.
Chem. 2011, 21 (23), 8381–8388.
(35) O’Bryan, G.; Wong, B. M.; McElhanon, J. R. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2 (6), 1594–
1600.
(36) Chen, Y.; Spiering, A. J. H.; Karthikeyan, S.; Peters, G. W. M.; Meijer, E. W.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat.
Chem. 2012, 4 (7), 559–562.
(37) Turro, N. J.; Lechtken, P.; Schore, N. E.; Schuster, G.; Steinmetzer, H. C.; Yekta, A. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1974, 7 (4), 97–105.
(38) Schuster, G. B.; Turro, N. J.; Steinmetzer, H. C.; Schaap, A. P.; Faler, G.; Adam, W.; Liu, J. C. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97 (24), 7110–7118.
(39) Sottos, N. R. Nat. Chem. 2014, 6 (5), 381–383.
(40) Wiggins, K. M.; Brantley, J. N.; Bielawski, C. W. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42 (17), 7130–7147.
(41) Diesendruck, C. E.; Steinberg, B. D.; Sugai, N.; Silberstein, M. N.; Sottos, N. R.; White, S. R.;
Braun, P. V.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134 (30), 12446–12449.
(42) Larsen, M. B.; Boydston, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135 (22), 8189–8192.
(43) Larsen, M. B.; Boydston, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (4), 1276–1279.
Polymer Mechanochemistry
19
1
(44) Kean, Z. S.; Akbulatov, S.; Tian, Y.; Widenhoefer, R. A.; Boulatov, R.; Craig, S. L. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2014, 53 (52), 14508–14511.
(45) Fèvre, M.; Pinaud, J.; Gnanou, Y.; Vignolle, J.; Taton, D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42 (5), 2142–
2172.
(46) Marion, N.; Díez-‐González, S.; Nolan, S. P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46 (17), 2988–3000.
(47) Hopkinson, M. N.; Richter, C.; Schedler, M.; Glorius, F. Nature 2014, 510 (7506), 485–496.
(48) Moore, J. L.; Rovis, T. Top. Curr. Chem. 2010, 291.
(49) Bantu, B.; Pawar, G. M.; Decker, U.; Wurst, K.; Schmidt, A. M.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Chem. – Eur.
J. 2009, 15 (13), 3103–3109.
(50) Naumann, S.; Schmidt, F. G.; Schowner, R.; Frey, W.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4
(9), 2731–2740.
(51) Naumann, S.; Schmidt, F. G.; Frey, W.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4 (15), 4172–
4181.
(52) Naumann, S.; Schmidt, F. G.; Speiser, M.; Böhl, M.; Epple, S.; Bonten, C.; Buchmeiser, M. R.
Macromolecules 2013, 46 (21), 8426–8433.
(53) Naumann, S.; Speiser, M.; Schowner, R.; Giebel, E.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Macromolecules 2014,
47 (14), 4548–4556.
(54) Kantchev, E. A. B.; O’Brien, C. J.; Organ, M. G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46 (16), 2768–
2813.
(55) Monsaert, S.; Lozano Vila, A.; Drozdzak, R.; Van Der Voort, P.; Verpoort, F. Chem. Soc. Rev.
2009.
(56) Piermattei, A.; Karthikeyan, S.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1 (2), 133–137.
(57) Groote, R.; van Haandel, L.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2012, 50 (23),
4929–4935.
(58) Dias, E. L.; Nguyen, S. T.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119 (17), 3887–3897.
(59) Van der Schaaf, P. A.; Kolly, R.; Kirner, H.-‐J.; Rime, F.; Mühlebach, A.; Hafner, A. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2000, 606 (1), 65–74.
(60) Jakobs, R. T. M.; Ma, S.; Sijbesma, R. P. ACS Macro Lett. 2013, 2 (7), 613–616.
Chapter 1
20
Chapter 2Mechanochemical chain scission in NHC-Pd centered coordination polymers
Ultrasound induced chain scission in coordination complexes of Palladium and Platinum
with polytetrahydrofuran functionalized N-heterocyclic carbene ligand is reported. Scission
is reversible when the polymer complex is sonicated in toluene under methane. The lowest
molecular weight complex that breaks was determined to be 20 kDa. Above this size the rate
of scission increases linearly with molecular weight of the polymer complex. Constrained
geometry simulations of external force (COGEF) calculations with DFT method provided
insight into the response of the NHC-Pd center to applied external force. Comparing scission
rates of Palladium and Platinum coordination polymers showed the influence of the force
needed for ligand dissociation.
(44) Kean, Z. S.; Akbulatov, S.; Tian, Y.; Widenhoefer, R. A.; Boulatov, R.; Craig, S. L. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2014, 53 (52), 14508–14511.
(45) Fèvre, M.; Pinaud, J.; Gnanou, Y.; Vignolle, J.; Taton, D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42 (5), 2142–
2172.
(46) Marion, N.; Díez-‐González, S.; Nolan, S. P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46 (17), 2988–3000.
(47) Hopkinson, M. N.; Richter, C.; Schedler, M.; Glorius, F. Nature 2014, 510 (7506), 485–496.
(48) Moore, J. L.; Rovis, T. Top. Curr. Chem. 2010, 291.
(49) Bantu, B.; Pawar, G. M.; Decker, U.; Wurst, K.; Schmidt, A. M.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Chem. – Eur.
J. 2009, 15 (13), 3103–3109.
(50) Naumann, S.; Schmidt, F. G.; Schowner, R.; Frey, W.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4
(9), 2731–2740.
(51) Naumann, S.; Schmidt, F. G.; Frey, W.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4 (15), 4172–
4181.
(52) Naumann, S.; Schmidt, F. G.; Speiser, M.; Böhl, M.; Epple, S.; Bonten, C.; Buchmeiser, M. R.
Macromolecules 2013, 46 (21), 8426–8433.
(53) Naumann, S.; Speiser, M.; Schowner, R.; Giebel, E.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Macromolecules 2014,
47 (14), 4548–4556.
(54) Kantchev, E. A. B.; O’Brien, C. J.; Organ, M. G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46 (16), 2768–
2813.
(55) Monsaert, S.; Lozano Vila, A.; Drozdzak, R.; Van Der Voort, P.; Verpoort, F. Chem. Soc. Rev.
2009.
(56) Piermattei, A.; Karthikeyan, S.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1 (2), 133–137.
(57) Groote, R.; van Haandel, L.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2012, 50 (23),
4929–4935.
(58) Dias, E. L.; Nguyen, S. T.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119 (17), 3887–3897.
(59) Van der Schaaf, P. A.; Kolly, R.; Kirner, H.-‐J.; Rime, F.; Mühlebach, A.; Hafner, A. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2000, 606 (1), 65–74.
(60) Jakobs, R. T. M.; Ma, S.; Sijbesma, R. P. ACS Macro Lett. 2013, 2 (7), 613–616.
Introduction
Mechanical activation of chemical bonds promises to provide opportunities to detect and
repair damage in polymeric materials. Incorporation of mechanophores into polymers
results in materials sensitive to mechanical stimuli and leads to useful molecular
transformations under stress. In solution, mechanically induced chain scission has been
used to release reactive end groups such as cyanoacrylates,1 trifluorovinyl ethers2 or azides3
from mechanophore precursors. Furthermore, transition metal complexes located in the
center of polymer chains have been dissociated by breaking the coordination bonds
mechanically, as an alternative to thermal activation for latent catalysts.4–6
One of the most efficient ways to exert force on a polymer in solution is the use of
sonication.7 Upon sonication of solution, cavitation leads to strong elongational stresses
around collapsing bubbles.8 The part of the polymer chain closest to the collapsing bubble
wall is pulled at a higher velocity than the far end, and this velocity gradient creates stress
along the backbone. This force reaches a maximum value at the center of the chain because
the flow field is centrosymmetric with respect to the molecule and as a consequence chain
scission occurs preferentially around the chain midpoint9 for polymers above a critical
molecular weight.
In our group, high-‐molecular-‐weight linear coordination polymers of diphenylphosphine
telechelic polytetrahydrofuran with palladium(II) dichloride have been studied.10 Molecular
weights of these polymers could be altered by ultrasound and it has been shown that
polytetrahydrofuran chains remain intact during sonication.11 This implies that only the
reversible palladium–phosphorus bonds are broken and coordinatively unsaturated
palladium complexes are transiently produced by the application of mechanical forces on
these coordination polymers.12 Furthermore, polymers which include both PdII and PtII,
were sonicated and showed that mechanical force selectively breaks the weaker Pd-‐
Phosphine bonds which are randomly distributed along the polymer backbone. Scission rate
is influenced by small changes in metal ligand coordination bond strength.13
Phosphine ligands have been intensively researched in Pd-‐mediated C-‐C and C-‐N bond
forming reactions, which are among the most versatile and powerful synthetic methods.14
However, in the last two decades the popularity of phosphines has been challenged by N-‐
heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs).15 Compared to tertiary phosphines, NHC ligands show
superior thermal stability and their synthetic availability provides the possibility to extensive
tuning of steric and electronic properties.16–18 Palladium-‐NHC complexes exhibit high
stability both in solid state and in solution due to strong metal ligand bonds, allowing for
easy storage and handling.19 Organ et. al. prepared well-‐defined Pd-‐PEPPSI-‐(NHC)
complexes with NHC and Pyridine (Py) ligands coordinated to Pd(II).18,20 They have proposed
that Py ligand serves as a ‘throw away’ ligand that dissociates from the Pd center in catalyst
activation process. Although the activation mechanism of these latent catalysts is not yet
fully understood, it has been shown that the Pd:ligand ratio, optimally 1:1,21,22 is crucial to
obtain high reactivity.23,24
This chapter presents the ultrasound induced chain scission in Pd(NHC)2 and Pt(NHC)2
complexes, functionalized with poly(tetrahydrofuran) as force accumulating arms. Scission
rates were calculated from the change in molecular weight distribution of polymers during
sonication. Molecular weight dependence of the scission rate was established and the effect
of bond strength on scission rates were determined with Constrained geometry
optimization (COGEF) calculations. These calculations also provided a more in depth
understanding on the structural change of the complex under the influence of an external
force that leads to chain scission.
Chapter 2
22
Introduction
Mechanical activation of chemical bonds promises to provide opportunities to detect and
repair damage in polymeric materials. Incorporation of mechanophores into polymers
results in materials sensitive to mechanical stimuli and leads to useful molecular
transformations under stress. In solution, mechanically induced chain scission has been
used to release reactive end groups such as cyanoacrylates,1 trifluorovinyl ethers2 or azides3
from mechanophore precursors. Furthermore, transition metal complexes located in the
center of polymer chains have been dissociated by breaking the coordination bonds
mechanically, as an alternative to thermal activation for latent catalysts.4–6
One of the most efficient ways to exert force on a polymer in solution is the use of
sonication.7 Upon sonication of solution, cavitation leads to strong elongational stresses
around collapsing bubbles.8 The part of the polymer chain closest to the collapsing bubble
wall is pulled at a higher velocity than the far end, and this velocity gradient creates stress
along the backbone. This force reaches a maximum value at the center of the chain because
the flow field is centrosymmetric with respect to the molecule and as a consequence chain
scission occurs preferentially around the chain midpoint9 for polymers above a critical
molecular weight.
In our group, high-‐molecular-‐weight linear coordination polymers of diphenylphosphine
telechelic polytetrahydrofuran with palladium(II) dichloride have been studied.10 Molecular
weights of these polymers could be altered by ultrasound and it has been shown that
polytetrahydrofuran chains remain intact during sonication.11 This implies that only the
reversible palladium–phosphorus bonds are broken and coordinatively unsaturated
palladium complexes are transiently produced by the application of mechanical forces on
these coordination polymers.12 Furthermore, polymers which include both PdII and PtII,
were sonicated and showed that mechanical force selectively breaks the weaker Pd-‐
Phosphine bonds which are randomly distributed along the polymer backbone. Scission rate
is influenced by small changes in metal ligand coordination bond strength.13
Phosphine ligands have been intensively researched in Pd-‐mediated C-‐C and C-‐N bond
forming reactions, which are among the most versatile and powerful synthetic methods.14
However, in the last two decades the popularity of phosphines has been challenged by N-‐
heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs).15 Compared to tertiary phosphines, NHC ligands show
superior thermal stability and their synthetic availability provides the possibility to extensive
tuning of steric and electronic properties.16–18 Palladium-‐NHC complexes exhibit high
stability both in solid state and in solution due to strong metal ligand bonds, allowing for
easy storage and handling.19 Organ et. al. prepared well-‐defined Pd-‐PEPPSI-‐(NHC)
complexes with NHC and Pyridine (Py) ligands coordinated to Pd(II).18,20 They have proposed
that Py ligand serves as a ‘throw away’ ligand that dissociates from the Pd center in catalyst
activation process. Although the activation mechanism of these latent catalysts is not yet
fully understood, it has been shown that the Pd:ligand ratio, optimally 1:1,21,22 is crucial to
obtain high reactivity.23,24
This chapter presents the ultrasound induced chain scission in Pd(NHC)2 and Pt(NHC)2
complexes, functionalized with poly(tetrahydrofuran) as force accumulating arms. Scission
rates were calculated from the change in molecular weight distribution of polymers during
sonication. Molecular weight dependence of the scission rate was established and the effect
of bond strength on scission rates were determined with Constrained geometry
optimization (COGEF) calculations. These calculations also provided a more in depth
understanding on the structural change of the complex under the influence of an external
force that leads to chain scission.
Mechanochemical chain scission in NHC-Pd
23
2
Results and Discussions
Synthesis
Scheme 1: Synthetic route to mechanically responsive NHC-‐Metal complexes (i) DTBP (ii) 1-‐Ethyl
imidazole, 20 min (iii) ion exchange resin, MeOH (iv) NaOtBu, THF – 4Å MS, 1h (v) M(PhCN)2Cl2 (M:
Pd or Pt), 8h, (vi) C4H9I, THF, (vii) ion exchange resin, MeOH, (viii) PdCl2, Cs2CO3, dioxane, 5h.
Polymeric ligands were prepared from imidazolium terminated precursor salts (Scheme 1),
which were obtained via a cationic ring opening polymerization of tetrahydrofuran (THF).
Polymerizations were initiated by methyl triflate and subsequently terminated by N-‐ethyl
imidazole to yield (EtIm-‐pTHF)Cl.25 Molecular weights (MW) of resulting polymers (Table 1)
depend on the polymerization time at room temperature, and were analyzed by 1H NMR,
MALDI-‐TOF and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The triflate counterions were
exchanged by chloride over ion exchange resin in methanol.
OS CF3
OOH3C
O
i, ii, iii
O O N N
O O N NCl
M
OONN
ClCl
+
iv, v
(EtIm-pTHF)Cl
M: Pd Pd(NHC-pTHF)2Cl2M: Pt Pt(NHC-pTHF)2Cl2
(EtIm-pTHF)Cl
N N
Pd
NN
ClClN NCl
vi, vii viiiN N
(ButEtIm)ClEtImPd(NHC-ButEt)2Cl2
Table 1: Molecular weights of EtIm-‐pTHF determined by GPC, NMR and MALDI-‐TOF
Polymer
Time (h)a
Molecular Weight (kDa)
GPCb NMRc MALDId
(EtIm-‐pTHF8k)Cl 1 19 9.4 8
(EtIm-‐pTHF12k)Cl 1.5 28 16 12
(EtIm-‐pTHF18k)Cl 2 48 21 18
(EtIm-‐pTHF25k)Cl 3 63 29 25
(EtIm-‐pTHF33k)Cl 4 72 38 33
(EtIm-‐pTHF40k)Cl 5 86 53 40
(EtIm-‐pTHF50k)Cl 6 108 63 50
a) polymerizations were initated by CH3CF3SO3 and performed at 20oC for given time, b) 2mg/ml polymer
solutions in THF were submitted to GPC at 20oC, 1 ml/min flow rate, PS standards were used for calibration c) 1H NMR spectra were taken in CD2Cl2 and Molecular weights were determined by end group analysis d) 1
mg/ml polymer solutions in CHCl3 were submitted to MALDI-‐TOF and peak tops were reported as molecular
weight.
(EtIm-‐pTHF)Cl salts were deprotonated on the imidazolium C2 position to create a N-‐
heterocyclic carbene (NHC-‐pTHF) which subsequently was coordinated to Palladium or
Platinum via exchange of the benzonitrile (PhCN) ligand in M(PhCN)2Cl2. The desired
complexes were obtained in high yield since PhCN coordination is weak and allows ligand
exchange at room temperature. Coordination of two NHC-‐pTHF ligands resulted in doubling
of molecular weight compared to the bare ligands as monitored by GPC. After 8h, molecular
weight distributions did not change and reactions were considered as completed. MW
distribution of polymers reveals bimodal GPC traces due to small amounts of pTHF not
terminated by EtIm. In order to determine initial weight fraction of M(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2
complexes bimodal distributions obtained in GPC were simulated by double Gaussian
function. Areas under the peaks were determined and used to calculate weight fractions.
Ligand coordination was also evident from 1H NMR which showed that signals for H(1)
proton of imidazole heterocycle had disappeared completely and H(4,5) protons shifted
upfield upon coordination to metals.
Chapter 2
24
Results and Discussions
Synthesis
Scheme 1: Synthetic route to mechanically responsive NHC-‐Metal complexes (i) DTBP (ii) 1-‐Ethyl
imidazole, 20 min (iii) ion exchange resin, MeOH (iv) NaOtBu, THF – 4Å MS, 1h (v) M(PhCN)2Cl2 (M:
Pd or Pt), 8h, (vi) C4H9I, THF, (vii) ion exchange resin, MeOH, (viii) PdCl2, Cs2CO3, dioxane, 5h.
Polymeric ligands were prepared from imidazolium terminated precursor salts (Scheme 1),
which were obtained via a cationic ring opening polymerization of tetrahydrofuran (THF).
Polymerizations were initiated by methyl triflate and subsequently terminated by N-‐ethyl
imidazole to yield (EtIm-‐pTHF)Cl.25 Molecular weights (MW) of resulting polymers (Table 1)
depend on the polymerization time at room temperature, and were analyzed by 1H NMR,
MALDI-‐TOF and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The triflate counterions were
exchanged by chloride over ion exchange resin in methanol.
OS CF3
OOH3C
O
i, ii, iii
O O N N
O O N NCl
M
OONN
ClCl
+
iv, v
(EtIm-pTHF)Cl
M: Pd Pd(NHC-pTHF)2Cl2M: Pt Pt(NHC-pTHF)2Cl2
(EtIm-pTHF)Cl
N N
Pd
NN
ClClN NCl
vi, vii viiiN N
(ButEtIm)ClEtImPd(NHC-ButEt)2Cl2
Table 1: Molecular weights of EtIm-‐pTHF determined by GPC, NMR and MALDI-‐TOF
Polymer
Time (h)a
Molecular Weight (kDa)
GPCb NMRc MALDId
(EtIm-‐pTHF8k)Cl 1 19 9.4 8
(EtIm-‐pTHF12k)Cl 1.5 28 16 12
(EtIm-‐pTHF18k)Cl 2 48 21 18
(EtIm-‐pTHF25k)Cl 3 63 29 25
(EtIm-‐pTHF33k)Cl 4 72 38 33
(EtIm-‐pTHF40k)Cl 5 86 53 40
(EtIm-‐pTHF50k)Cl 6 108 63 50
a) polymerizations were initated by CH3CF3SO3 and performed at 20oC for given time, b) 2mg/ml polymer
solutions in THF were submitted to GPC at 20oC, 1 ml/min flow rate, PS standards were used for calibration c) 1H NMR spectra were taken in CD2Cl2 and Molecular weights were determined by end group analysis d) 1
mg/ml polymer solutions in CHCl3 were submitted to MALDI-‐TOF and peak tops were reported as molecular
weight.
(EtIm-‐pTHF)Cl salts were deprotonated on the imidazolium C2 position to create a N-‐
heterocyclic carbene (NHC-‐pTHF) which subsequently was coordinated to Palladium or
Platinum via exchange of the benzonitrile (PhCN) ligand in M(PhCN)2Cl2. The desired
complexes were obtained in high yield since PhCN coordination is weak and allows ligand
exchange at room temperature. Coordination of two NHC-‐pTHF ligands resulted in doubling
of molecular weight compared to the bare ligands as monitored by GPC. After 8h, molecular
weight distributions did not change and reactions were considered as completed. MW
distribution of polymers reveals bimodal GPC traces due to small amounts of pTHF not
terminated by EtIm. In order to determine initial weight fraction of M(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2
complexes bimodal distributions obtained in GPC were simulated by double Gaussian
function. Areas under the peaks were determined and used to calculate weight fractions.
Ligand coordination was also evident from 1H NMR which showed that signals for H(1)
proton of imidazole heterocycle had disappeared completely and H(4,5) protons shifted
upfield upon coordination to metals.
Mechanochemical chain scission in NHC-Pd
25
2
Chain Scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2
Chain scission in polymers Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 was investigated in toluene solutions (10
mg/ml) which were sonicated for 60 min using a sonication probe. During sonication Ar or
CH4 was bubbled through the solution starting 15 minutes prior to sonication. The double-‐
jacketed sonication vessel was cooled down to 2oC by water circulation from a thermostat-‐
controlled bath. Temperature inside the sonication vessel was checked by a thermocouple
and was constant at 25 oC after thermal equilibration (~ 5 min).
Figure 1: Molecular weight change during sonication of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 in the presence of
trapping agents AcOH and MeCN to block coordination, monitored by GPC. Polymer solutions
(10mg/ml) in dry toluene were subjected to continuous sonication for 1h, while the internal
temperature was constant at 25oC. 200 µL aliquots were collected at given times, solvent was
evaporated under reduced pressure; residue was dissolved in THF and submitted immediately to
GPC.
Bond rupture on mechano-‐responsive organometallic unit at the center of polymer chain
yields free NHC and coordinatively unsaturated Pd. Reversibility of the ligand-‐metal
interactions might then result in re-‐coordination of sonication products. Therefore,
sonication was performed in the presence of acetic acid (AcOH) (2.4 %, w/w) and
acetonitrile (MeCN) (1.8 %, w/w) as trapping agents, to stabilize the scission products and
prevent the re-‐coordination. The stability of the Pd-‐NHC coordination complexes in the
presence of these trapping agents was established by stirring in toluene in the presence of
AcOH and MeCN at room temperature. In the course of 1h, no change in MW was observed
with GPC.
Figure 2: Reversibility test of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2: a) under CH4 b) under Ar. c) Comparison of
change in molecular weight distribution of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 as a function of sonication time
with and without trapping agents under CH4 and Ar. d) Ultrasound induced reversible chain scission
of the Pd-‐NHC bond. Samples with a concentration of 10 mg/ml were subjected to continuous
sonication in dry toluene for 1h. In the absence of trapping agents molecular weight distribution did
not change under CH4 in contrast to sonication under Ar. Solid and dashed lines represent GPC
traces for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 before and after sonication respectively.
After sonication in the presence of the trapping agents, GPC traces showed the formation of
species with half of the initial MW, confirming that scission occurs selectively at the central
bonds (Figure 1). In the presence of trapping agents, 1h of continuous sonication resulted in
approximately 55% chain scission for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2. However, without any trapping
agent under CH4, no significant change in molecular weight was observed after 1h (Figure
Chapter 2
26
Chain Scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2
Chain scission in polymers Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 was investigated in toluene solutions (10
mg/ml) which were sonicated for 60 min using a sonication probe. During sonication Ar or
CH4 was bubbled through the solution starting 15 minutes prior to sonication. The double-‐
jacketed sonication vessel was cooled down to 2oC by water circulation from a thermostat-‐
controlled bath. Temperature inside the sonication vessel was checked by a thermocouple
and was constant at 25 oC after thermal equilibration (~ 5 min).
Figure 1: Molecular weight change during sonication of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 in the presence of
trapping agents AcOH and MeCN to block coordination, monitored by GPC. Polymer solutions
(10mg/ml) in dry toluene were subjected to continuous sonication for 1h, while the internal
temperature was constant at 25oC. 200 µL aliquots were collected at given times, solvent was
evaporated under reduced pressure; residue was dissolved in THF and submitted immediately to
GPC.
Bond rupture on mechano-‐responsive organometallic unit at the center of polymer chain
yields free NHC and coordinatively unsaturated Pd. Reversibility of the ligand-‐metal
interactions might then result in re-‐coordination of sonication products. Therefore,
sonication was performed in the presence of acetic acid (AcOH) (2.4 %, w/w) and
acetonitrile (MeCN) (1.8 %, w/w) as trapping agents, to stabilize the scission products and
prevent the re-‐coordination. The stability of the Pd-‐NHC coordination complexes in the
presence of these trapping agents was established by stirring in toluene in the presence of
AcOH and MeCN at room temperature. In the course of 1h, no change in MW was observed
with GPC.
Figure 2: Reversibility test of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2: a) under CH4 b) under Ar. c) Comparison of
change in molecular weight distribution of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 as a function of sonication time
with and without trapping agents under CH4 and Ar. d) Ultrasound induced reversible chain scission
of the Pd-‐NHC bond. Samples with a concentration of 10 mg/ml were subjected to continuous
sonication in dry toluene for 1h. In the absence of trapping agents molecular weight distribution did
not change under CH4 in contrast to sonication under Ar. Solid and dashed lines represent GPC
traces for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 before and after sonication respectively.
After sonication in the presence of the trapping agents, GPC traces showed the formation of
species with half of the initial MW, confirming that scission occurs selectively at the central
bonds (Figure 1). In the presence of trapping agents, 1h of continuous sonication resulted in
approximately 55% chain scission for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2. However, without any trapping
agent under CH4, no significant change in molecular weight was observed after 1h (Figure
Mechanochemical chain scission in NHC-Pd
27
2
2). This indicates that chain scission is selective to NHC-‐metal coordination bond and
without trapping agents scission is completely reversible. Control experiments were
performed with low molecular weight complex Pd(NHC-‐But)2Cl2 to investigate the role of
thermal effects in scission. Ultrasound did not cause any changes when Pd(NHC-‐But)2Cl2 was
sonicated with trapping agents for 1h (under CH4 or Ar). The amount of total imidazolium
after 1h of sonication of the 36k polymer is the same regardless of saturation gas; however,
under Ar sonication yields up to 30% irreversible chain scission. Further reaction of the
scission products (free NHC and coordinatively unsaturated Pd center) with sonochemical
impurities which are produced due to possible solvent pyrolysis in hot spots,26 prevents
reversible recoordination under argon. The use of CH4 instead of Ar as the saturation gas led
to suppression of thermal effects during sonication and reversible scission on NHC-‐Pd
coordination bond with increased lifetime of mechanically released free NHC in solution.
1H NMR spectra, taken for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 samples before and after sonication,
showed that the sonication revealed two new sets of peaks (Figure 3). These peaks are
assumed to be due to free NHC that is taken off and subsequently protonated by the
trapping agent, and Pd center with monoNHC. Since the NHC taken off by ultrasound is
prevented from re-‐coordination, the remaining monoNHC-‐Pd part should be coordinated by
another ligand presents in the solution. MeCN was used to serve as the stabilizing ligand
during the course of sonication. However, NMR spectra showed that MeCN was not
coordinated. It is known for hetero NHC complexes of Pd that a stronger donating co-‐ligand
leads to downfield shift in NMR spectrum of the NHC ligand.27 Since MeCN is a weaker
donor than NHC, shift in opposite direction would have been expected upon coordination of
MeCN. Thus, it is not trivial at this point to determine the exact chemical structure of the
scission product that contains Pd, since coordinatively unsaturated Pd center could
coordinate to any other ligand (i.e. acetate anion) or dimerize28 to stabilize its structure.
Figure 3: Stacked 1H NMR spectra for (a) EtIm-‐pTHF25k (b) Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 and (c) Pd(NHC-‐
pTHF25k)2Cl2 after sonication.
Determination of limiting molecular weight Mlim
It is well established that mechanochemical scission of polymers only occurs above a
molecular weight threshold (Mlim).29 Below Mlim, no scission takes place since polymer
chains are too short to accumulate the force required to break chemical bonds.30 Mlim
lowers significantly if a weak bond is incorporated into a polymer chain. Coordination
bonds, weaker than covalent bonds on polymer backbone break more easily and result in
lower Mlim compared to their covalent counterparts.13 In addition to bond strength,
experimental conditions such as ultrasound intensity, solvent composition, temperature,
and gas molecules dissolved in solution also influence Mlim.31 In order to compare
mechanochemical properties of different mechanophores, experimental conditions should
be the same. Therefore we decided to investigate Mlim and the molecular weight
dependence of scission rate for a specific set of sonication conditions, and to correlate
scissability with bond dissociation energies for the Metal-‐NHC (Pd, Pt) complexes.
Chapter 2
28
2). This indicates that chain scission is selective to NHC-‐metal coordination bond and
without trapping agents scission is completely reversible. Control experiments were
performed with low molecular weight complex Pd(NHC-‐But)2Cl2 to investigate the role of
thermal effects in scission. Ultrasound did not cause any changes when Pd(NHC-‐But)2Cl2 was
sonicated with trapping agents for 1h (under CH4 or Ar). The amount of total imidazolium
after 1h of sonication of the 36k polymer is the same regardless of saturation gas; however,
under Ar sonication yields up to 30% irreversible chain scission. Further reaction of the
scission products (free NHC and coordinatively unsaturated Pd center) with sonochemical
impurities which are produced due to possible solvent pyrolysis in hot spots,26 prevents
reversible recoordination under argon. The use of CH4 instead of Ar as the saturation gas led
to suppression of thermal effects during sonication and reversible scission on NHC-‐Pd
coordination bond with increased lifetime of mechanically released free NHC in solution.
1H NMR spectra, taken for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 samples before and after sonication,
showed that the sonication revealed two new sets of peaks (Figure 3). These peaks are
assumed to be due to free NHC that is taken off and subsequently protonated by the
trapping agent, and Pd center with monoNHC. Since the NHC taken off by ultrasound is
prevented from re-‐coordination, the remaining monoNHC-‐Pd part should be coordinated by
another ligand presents in the solution. MeCN was used to serve as the stabilizing ligand
during the course of sonication. However, NMR spectra showed that MeCN was not
coordinated. It is known for hetero NHC complexes of Pd that a stronger donating co-‐ligand
leads to downfield shift in NMR spectrum of the NHC ligand.27 Since MeCN is a weaker
donor than NHC, shift in opposite direction would have been expected upon coordination of
MeCN. Thus, it is not trivial at this point to determine the exact chemical structure of the
scission product that contains Pd, since coordinatively unsaturated Pd center could
coordinate to any other ligand (i.e. acetate anion) or dimerize28 to stabilize its structure.
Figure 3: Stacked 1H NMR spectra for (a) EtIm-‐pTHF25k (b) Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 and (c) Pd(NHC-‐
pTHF25k)2Cl2 after sonication.
Determination of limiting molecular weight Mlim
It is well established that mechanochemical scission of polymers only occurs above a
molecular weight threshold (Mlim).29 Below Mlim, no scission takes place since polymer
chains are too short to accumulate the force required to break chemical bonds.30 Mlim
lowers significantly if a weak bond is incorporated into a polymer chain. Coordination
bonds, weaker than covalent bonds on polymer backbone break more easily and result in
lower Mlim compared to their covalent counterparts.13 In addition to bond strength,
experimental conditions such as ultrasound intensity, solvent composition, temperature,
and gas molecules dissolved in solution also influence Mlim.31 In order to compare
mechanochemical properties of different mechanophores, experimental conditions should
be the same. Therefore we decided to investigate Mlim and the molecular weight
dependence of scission rate for a specific set of sonication conditions, and to correlate
scissability with bond dissociation energies for the Metal-‐NHC (Pd, Pt) complexes.
Mechanochemical chain scission in NHC-Pd
29
2
In order to prevent complication of the analysis from scission of covalent bonds, the
polymeric ligand must have a molecular weight that is lower than Mlim for covalent bond
scission. Therefore, the limiting molecular weight of covalent pTHF was determined in a
separate set of experiments. EtIm-‐pTHF samples with Mw ranging between 8 and 50 kDa
were subjected to ultrasound at 20 kHz with a power density of 15.4 W/cm2 in toluene
solutions (10 mg/ml) under CH4. Internal temperature of the double-‐jacketed sonication
vessel was constant at 25oC (±2 oC) throughout sonication.
GPC traces for polymer samples before and after sonication showed that the molecular
weight distribution for EtIm-‐pTHF below 25 kDa did not change significantly by sonication.
However, polymer with a MW higher than 30 kDa degraded irreversibly as shown by both
GPC (Figure 4) and MALDI-‐TOF (Figure 5). This sets a limit (Mlim) to the MW of force-‐
accumulating ligands (EtIm-‐pTHF) below which they are not destroyed by ultrasound. Thus,
only ligands with a molecular weight lower than Mlim for pTHF (<30kDa) were used to
synthesize mechano-‐responsive polymers with a central Pd-‐NHC mechanophore.
Figure 4: GPC traces for polymer samples of EtIm-‐pTHF taken before and after sonication. 10 mg/ml
samples were sonicated (continuous) in toluene under CH4. Aliquots were taken and solvent was
evaporated, residue was dissolved in THF and directly submitted to GPC. Black and red lines
represented traces for aliquots taken before and after sonication samples. Curves were normalized
to peak areas.
Figure 5: MALDI-‐TOF spectra for EtIm-‐pTHF50k before (left) and after (right) 1h of sonication.
The GPC trace of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF8k)2Cl2 did not change after 1 h of continuous sonication
under CH4 in the presence of acetonitrile and acetic acid as trapping agents (Figure 6).
However, higher molecular weight complex Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 showed around %80
chain scission after 1h of continuous sonication. Mechanochemical fragmentation of
Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 revealed a product with a sharp peak corresponding to MW of 25 kDa,
that is consistent with the previously reported center specific chain scission for
mechanophore incorporated polymers.32 This observation confirms that Mlim for Pd(NHC-‐
pTHF)Cl2 complex is higher than 16 kDa under above mentioned conditions and central
coordination bond remains intact when polymer chain is not sufficiently long.
Chapter 2
30
In order to prevent complication of the analysis from scission of covalent bonds, the
polymeric ligand must have a molecular weight that is lower than Mlim for covalent bond
scission. Therefore, the limiting molecular weight of covalent pTHF was determined in a
separate set of experiments. EtIm-‐pTHF samples with Mw ranging between 8 and 50 kDa
were subjected to ultrasound at 20 kHz with a power density of 15.4 W/cm2 in toluene
solutions (10 mg/ml) under CH4. Internal temperature of the double-‐jacketed sonication
vessel was constant at 25oC (±2 oC) throughout sonication.
GPC traces for polymer samples before and after sonication showed that the molecular
weight distribution for EtIm-‐pTHF below 25 kDa did not change significantly by sonication.
However, polymer with a MW higher than 30 kDa degraded irreversibly as shown by both
GPC (Figure 4) and MALDI-‐TOF (Figure 5). This sets a limit (Mlim) to the MW of force-‐
accumulating ligands (EtIm-‐pTHF) below which they are not destroyed by ultrasound. Thus,
only ligands with a molecular weight lower than Mlim for pTHF (<30kDa) were used to
synthesize mechano-‐responsive polymers with a central Pd-‐NHC mechanophore.
Figure 4: GPC traces for polymer samples of EtIm-‐pTHF taken before and after sonication. 10 mg/ml
samples were sonicated (continuous) in toluene under CH4. Aliquots were taken and solvent was
evaporated, residue was dissolved in THF and directly submitted to GPC. Black and red lines
represented traces for aliquots taken before and after sonication samples. Curves were normalized
to peak areas.
Figure 5: MALDI-‐TOF spectra for EtIm-‐pTHF50k before (left) and after (right) 1h of sonication.
The GPC trace of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF8k)2Cl2 did not change after 1 h of continuous sonication
under CH4 in the presence of acetonitrile and acetic acid as trapping agents (Figure 6).
However, higher molecular weight complex Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 showed around %80
chain scission after 1h of continuous sonication. Mechanochemical fragmentation of
Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 revealed a product with a sharp peak corresponding to MW of 25 kDa,
that is consistent with the previously reported center specific chain scission for
mechanophore incorporated polymers.32 This observation confirms that Mlim for Pd(NHC-‐
pTHF)Cl2 complex is higher than 16 kDa under above mentioned conditions and central
coordination bond remains intact when polymer chain is not sufficiently long.
Mechanochemical chain scission in NHC-Pd
31
2
Figure 6: GPC traces for polymer samples taken before and after sonication. a) EtIm-‐pTHF18k, b)
EtIm-‐pTHF50k, c) Pd(NHC-‐pTHF8k)2Cl2 and d) Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2. Palladium containing polymers,
Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2, were sonicated in the presence of trapping agents.
Scission Rates for M(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2
The rate of mechanically induced scission in covalent polymers has been shown to be
proportional to [MW -‐ Mlim] when the initial molecular weight is greater than Mlim32,33 When
such a molecular weight dependence is observed, thermal decomposition can be excluded,
because it proves that bond rupture process is mechano-‐chemical and not the result of local
heating or reaction with solvent decomposition products.34 The increase of scission rate
with increasing molecular weight is caused by the larger accumulated elongational stress at
the center of long polymer chains, in combination with their longer relaxation time, which
reduces the rate of stress relaxation by chain motion.35
Figure 7: Real data for GPC traces and deconvolution curves represented with black and gray lines
respectively for initial MW distribution of (a) Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 and (b) Pt(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2.
Molecular weight dependence of the mechanochemical scission rate for M(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2
complexes were determined by sonicating samples separately. Molecular weight
distributions for collected aliquots throughout sonication were determined by GPC in THF
and peak areas were calculated by deconvolution of traces with a bimodal molecular weight
distribution (Figure 7). The concentration change of polymer complex during sonication was
estimated under the assumption that peak area is proportional to weight fraction in RI
detection. The scission rates of the Pd and Pt complexes were fitted with equation 3,
assuming first order reaction kinetics since chain scission is selective to chain mid-‐point.
𝑃𝑃 𝑥𝑥 → 2𝑃𝑃 𝑥𝑥 2 (1)
− ! ! !!"
= 𝑘𝑘!"[𝑃𝑃 𝑥𝑥 ] (2)
where P(x) is initial polymer and P(x/2) is the fragmentation product. Thus, degradation follows first-‐order kinetics and weight fraction of starting material C1 decays exponentially with the equation;
𝐶𝐶! 𝑡𝑡 = 𝐶𝐶! 0 ×𝑒𝑒 !!!"! (3)
where, t is sonication time, C1(0) is initial weight fraction of starting material, C1(t) is weight fraction of starting material at any time during sonication and ksc is mechanochemical scission rate coefficient.
Chapter 2
32
Figure 6: GPC traces for polymer samples taken before and after sonication. a) EtIm-‐pTHF18k, b)
EtIm-‐pTHF50k, c) Pd(NHC-‐pTHF8k)2Cl2 and d) Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2. Palladium containing polymers,
Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2, were sonicated in the presence of trapping agents.
Scission Rates for M(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2
The rate of mechanically induced scission in covalent polymers has been shown to be
proportional to [MW -‐ Mlim] when the initial molecular weight is greater than Mlim32,33 When
such a molecular weight dependence is observed, thermal decomposition can be excluded,
because it proves that bond rupture process is mechano-‐chemical and not the result of local
heating or reaction with solvent decomposition products.34 The increase of scission rate
with increasing molecular weight is caused by the larger accumulated elongational stress at
the center of long polymer chains, in combination with their longer relaxation time, which
reduces the rate of stress relaxation by chain motion.35
Figure 7: Real data for GPC traces and deconvolution curves represented with black and gray lines
respectively for initial MW distribution of (a) Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 and (b) Pt(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2.
Molecular weight dependence of the mechanochemical scission rate for M(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2
complexes were determined by sonicating samples separately. Molecular weight
distributions for collected aliquots throughout sonication were determined by GPC in THF
and peak areas were calculated by deconvolution of traces with a bimodal molecular weight
distribution (Figure 7). The concentration change of polymer complex during sonication was
estimated under the assumption that peak area is proportional to weight fraction in RI
detection. The scission rates of the Pd and Pt complexes were fitted with equation 3,
assuming first order reaction kinetics since chain scission is selective to chain mid-‐point.
𝑃𝑃 𝑥𝑥 → 2𝑃𝑃 𝑥𝑥 2 (1)
− ! ! !!"
= 𝑘𝑘!"[𝑃𝑃 𝑥𝑥 ] (2)
where P(x) is initial polymer and P(x/2) is the fragmentation product. Thus, degradation follows first-‐order kinetics and weight fraction of starting material C1 decays exponentially with the equation;
𝐶𝐶! 𝑡𝑡 = 𝐶𝐶! 0 ×𝑒𝑒 !!!"! (3)
where, t is sonication time, C1(0) is initial weight fraction of starting material, C1(t) is weight fraction of starting material at any time during sonication and ksc is mechanochemical scission rate coefficient.
Mechanochemical chain scission in NHC-Pd
33
2
Figure 8: Change in initial polymer concentration vs. sonication time for M(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 (M:
Pd, and Pt).
M(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 samples were sonicated separately and their scission rate constants (ksc)
were determined by exponential fitting. The ksc vs MW plot in Figure 8 shows that chain
scission in Pt containing polymers is slower than in Pd containing counterparts for each
initial MW. Although the calculated ksc’s are linearly dependent on MW for both metals, the
slopes of the lines are different. Madras et al. used the following equation to express ksc as a
function of MW:35
𝑘𝑘!" = 𝑘𝑘! (𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 − 𝑀𝑀!"#)ƛ (4)
In which 𝑘𝑘! is an empirical proportionality constant. In the Pd and Pt complexes, the
molecular weight dependent scission rates fit well to equation 4 with exponent λ equal to 1.
Mlim values for both mechanophores were estimated from linear extrapolation of the plots
of ksc vs MW (Figure 10) as 20 kDa and 22 kDa for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and for Pt(NHC-‐
pTHF)2Cl2 (Table 2) respectively.
Table 2: kd and Mlim values for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2, Pt(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and EtIm-‐pTHF
Polymer kd (mol x g-‐1 x min-‐1) Mlim (kDa)
Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 7.42×10!! ±3.63×10!! 20
Pt(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 5.27×10!! ±2.23×10!! 22
EtIm-‐pTHF 3.12×10!! ±5.54×10!! 29
kd is the slope and Mlim is the intercept in the plot of ksc vs. MW
The different 𝑘𝑘! values for the Pd and Pt complexes are in contrast to the observed MW
dependencies for covalent bond scission of isomers of cyclobutane mechanophores,
reported by Moore et al (Figure 9).36 They observed that calculated Fmax (the maximum force
imposed on the model mechanophores for bond rupture to occur) and experimentally
determined Mlim values differ significantly for different mechanophores. However, slopes in
a plot of ksc vs MW are identical for all regardless of mechanophore’s chemical structure.
Figure 9: Structures of cis and trans dicyano-‐substituted cyclobutanes (DCC and DCT), cis and trans
monocyano-‐substituted cyclobutanes (MCC and MCT), and cis and trans cyclobutanes without cyano
substituents (NCC and NCT). R represents a poly(methylacrylate) chain. The table summarizes the
Fmax and Mlim values for related mechanophores. Adapted from ref 36.
Chapter 2
34
Figure 8: Change in initial polymer concentration vs. sonication time for M(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 (M:
Pd, and Pt).
M(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 samples were sonicated separately and their scission rate constants (ksc)
were determined by exponential fitting. The ksc vs MW plot in Figure 8 shows that chain
scission in Pt containing polymers is slower than in Pd containing counterparts for each
initial MW. Although the calculated ksc’s are linearly dependent on MW for both metals, the
slopes of the lines are different. Madras et al. used the following equation to express ksc as a
function of MW:35
𝑘𝑘!" = 𝑘𝑘! (𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 − 𝑀𝑀!"#)ƛ (4)
In which 𝑘𝑘! is an empirical proportionality constant. In the Pd and Pt complexes, the
molecular weight dependent scission rates fit well to equation 4 with exponent λ equal to 1.
Mlim values for both mechanophores were estimated from linear extrapolation of the plots
of ksc vs MW (Figure 10) as 20 kDa and 22 kDa for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and for Pt(NHC-‐
pTHF)2Cl2 (Table 2) respectively.
Table 2: kd and Mlim values for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2, Pt(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and EtIm-‐pTHF
Polymer kd (mol x g-‐1 x min-‐1) Mlim (kDa)
Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 7.42×10!! ±3.63×10!! 20
Pt(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 5.27×10!! ±2.23×10!! 22
EtIm-‐pTHF 3.12×10!! ±5.54×10!! 29
kd is the slope and Mlim is the intercept in the plot of ksc vs. MW
The different 𝑘𝑘! values for the Pd and Pt complexes are in contrast to the observed MW
dependencies for covalent bond scission of isomers of cyclobutane mechanophores,
reported by Moore et al (Figure 9).36 They observed that calculated Fmax (the maximum force
imposed on the model mechanophores for bond rupture to occur) and experimentally
determined Mlim values differ significantly for different mechanophores. However, slopes in
a plot of ksc vs MW are identical for all regardless of mechanophore’s chemical structure.
Figure 9: Structures of cis and trans dicyano-‐substituted cyclobutanes (DCC and DCT), cis and trans
monocyano-‐substituted cyclobutanes (MCC and MCT), and cis and trans cyclobutanes without cyano
substituents (NCC and NCT). R represents a poly(methylacrylate) chain. The table summarizes the
Fmax and Mlim values for related mechanophores. Adapted from ref 36.
Mechanochemical chain scission in NHC-Pd
35
2
Figure 10: Molecular weight dependence of scission rates (ksc) for coordination polymers M(NHC-‐
pTHF)2Cl2 (M:Pd and Pt), and covalent polymer (EtIm-‐pTHF)Cl.
In order to verify the observed difference in kd and Mlim between Pd and Pt containing
polymers, we have first calculated the bond dissociation energy (BDE) for M-‐NHC bond for
Pd and Pt using DFT method. The PBE0 hybrid functional that accounts for 25% of Hartree-‐
Fock exchange has been employed together with the TZVP basis set reported by Ahlrichs et.
al. 37,38 Data represents the reaction ML2 → LM + L where ligand (L) was chosen as EtMetIm
for structural simplicity. BDEs for M-‐ligand coordination bonds were calculated as 195
kJ/mol and 245 kJ/mol for Pd-‐NHC and Pt-‐NHC respectively. Energies mentioned here is the
energy difference between coordinated and dissociated states. This indicates that the
energy needed to remove one NHC ligand coordinated to metal in M(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2
complexes is significantly lower than C-‐C or C-‐O bond dissociation energies (>350 kJ/mol).39
Therefore, the coordination bond in M-‐NHC incorporated polymers is the weakest bond on
the chain backbone and breaks selectively during sonication.
Mlim for Pd and Pt containing M(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes are higher than the one
previously reported for Ag(NHC-‐pTHF)2PF6 complex (<13 kDa33). That is also consistent with
the BDE for Ag-‐NHC bond, which was calculated as 141 kJ/mol using the same method as for
Pd and Pt.
Determining of BDEs for the complexes in concern showed that the higher BDE corresponds
to a higher Mlim. However, it does not explain the difference in the molecular weight
dependence of scission rates, i.e. the difference in slopes (𝑘𝑘!) in Figure 10.
An explanation of the difference in 𝑘𝑘! values for coordinative bonds versus covalent bonds,
and between different coordinative bonds must be sought in the relation between force and
scission rate, which is expressed in its most simple form as the Bell-‐Evans equation:40,41
𝑘𝑘 𝐹𝐹 = 𝑘𝑘!𝑒𝑒!∆!‡/!!!
This equation expresses the fact that the force dependence of scission rate k(F) can be very
different for even for bonds with equal k0 when there is a difference between the values of
Δx‡, the change in bond length between the force free equilibrium bond length, and the
transition state bond length under force. Given the differences in equilibrium bond lengths
and the shape of the potential well for coordinative bonds and covalent (C-‐C) bonds,
differences in the slope of the plots in Figure 10 are not surprising. Similar trend in force-‐
rate relationship was reported previously in literature as shown in Figure 11.42
Figure 11: Measured (points) and calculated (lines) rate–force correlations of three reactions.42
In order to determine the Fmax dependence of Mlim for M(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes the
pulling force was implemented by the COGEF method, where constrained geometries are
used to simulate the presence of a pulling force.43 Distance between carbene carbons of
different NHCs coordinated to the same Pd center (C1 and C2) was increased sequentially
and the energy of the system was calculated. BDE, in this case, was calculated as the relative
energy at very high-‐constrained distance (Figure 12a). Fmax values were calculated from the
derivative of relative energy vs constrained distance curve (Figure 12b).
Chapter 2
36
Figure 10: Molecular weight dependence of scission rates (ksc) for coordination polymers M(NHC-‐
pTHF)2Cl2 (M:Pd and Pt), and covalent polymer (EtIm-‐pTHF)Cl.
In order to verify the observed difference in kd and Mlim between Pd and Pt containing
polymers, we have first calculated the bond dissociation energy (BDE) for M-‐NHC bond for
Pd and Pt using DFT method. The PBE0 hybrid functional that accounts for 25% of Hartree-‐
Fock exchange has been employed together with the TZVP basis set reported by Ahlrichs et.
al. 37,38 Data represents the reaction ML2 → LM + L where ligand (L) was chosen as EtMetIm
for structural simplicity. BDEs for M-‐ligand coordination bonds were calculated as 195
kJ/mol and 245 kJ/mol for Pd-‐NHC and Pt-‐NHC respectively. Energies mentioned here is the
energy difference between coordinated and dissociated states. This indicates that the
energy needed to remove one NHC ligand coordinated to metal in M(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2
complexes is significantly lower than C-‐C or C-‐O bond dissociation energies (>350 kJ/mol).39
Therefore, the coordination bond in M-‐NHC incorporated polymers is the weakest bond on
the chain backbone and breaks selectively during sonication.
Mlim for Pd and Pt containing M(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes are higher than the one
previously reported for Ag(NHC-‐pTHF)2PF6 complex (<13 kDa33). That is also consistent with
the BDE for Ag-‐NHC bond, which was calculated as 141 kJ/mol using the same method as for
Pd and Pt.
Determining of BDEs for the complexes in concern showed that the higher BDE corresponds
to a higher Mlim. However, it does not explain the difference in the molecular weight
dependence of scission rates, i.e. the difference in slopes (𝑘𝑘!) in Figure 10.
An explanation of the difference in 𝑘𝑘! values for coordinative bonds versus covalent bonds,
and between different coordinative bonds must be sought in the relation between force and
scission rate, which is expressed in its most simple form as the Bell-‐Evans equation:40,41
𝑘𝑘 𝐹𝐹 = 𝑘𝑘!𝑒𝑒!∆!‡/!!!
This equation expresses the fact that the force dependence of scission rate k(F) can be very
different for even for bonds with equal k0 when there is a difference between the values of
Δx‡, the change in bond length between the force free equilibrium bond length, and the
transition state bond length under force. Given the differences in equilibrium bond lengths
and the shape of the potential well for coordinative bonds and covalent (C-‐C) bonds,
differences in the slope of the plots in Figure 10 are not surprising. Similar trend in force-‐
rate relationship was reported previously in literature as shown in Figure 11.42
Figure 11: Measured (points) and calculated (lines) rate–force correlations of three reactions.42
In order to determine the Fmax dependence of Mlim for M(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes the
pulling force was implemented by the COGEF method, where constrained geometries are
used to simulate the presence of a pulling force.43 Distance between carbene carbons of
different NHCs coordinated to the same Pd center (C1 and C2) was increased sequentially
and the energy of the system was calculated. BDE, in this case, was calculated as the relative
energy at very high-‐constrained distance (Figure 12a). Fmax values were calculated from the
derivative of relative energy vs constrained distance curve (Figure 12b).
Mechanochemical chain scission in NHC-Pd
37
2
Table 3: BDE, Mlim, Fmax for coordination polymers with Ag, Pd, Pt and covalent polymer pTHF.
Polymer Bond ∆E (kJ/mol) Mlim (kDa) Fmax (nN)
Ag(NHC-‐pTHF)2PF6 Ag-‐Ca,b 141 >13 0.5
Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 Pd-‐Ca 195 20 3.0
Pt(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 Pt-‐Ca 245 22 4.2
pTHF C-‐Cc
C-‐Oc
370
344 29d
6.9
7.6 a C represents the carbene carbon of NHC that is coordinated to the metal center bref 25 cref 41 dthis work
As summarized in Table 3, application of an external force of 2.9 nN and 4.2 nN would be
sufficient to achieve scission of the Pd–C and Pt-‐C bonds in M-‐NHC complexes respectively
at room temperature. Since these values are significantly lower than the force required to
break bonds on pTHF chain,43 M-‐ligand bonds are the most susceptible bonds on polymer
backbone to mechanical rupture. Mlim values, which were found experimentally for Pd(NHC-‐
pTHF)2Cl2, Pt(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and pTHF are in good agreement with the trend in calculated
BDE and Fmax values.
Figure 12: Chemical structure of Pd(NHC)2Cl2 that was used in calculations and change in relative
energy (a) and force (b) as a function of distance between NHC-‐Pd. Arrows on chemical structure
indicate the pulling direction.
Chain scission mechanism
In the previous section COGEF calculations were done with the constraint C1-‐Pd-‐C2 distance
as constraint. In order to understand the chain scission mechanism, however, a second
series of simulations was carried out. In mechanochemical experiments, tensile force is
transduced through the polymer chain to the central mechanophore, and the applied force
is orthogonal to C-‐Pd bond (Figure 14c). Therefore, in the calculations, pulling was also
simulated as orthogonal to NHC-‐Pd coordination bond. Ethyl groups were used instead of
long pTHF chains to reduce computational effort. The distance between two terminal
carbon atoms on different NHCs coordinated to the same Pd center was increased
sequentially from 8 to 12 Å. (Figure 13).
Chapter 2
38
Table 3: BDE, Mlim, Fmax for coordination polymers with Ag, Pd, Pt and covalent polymer pTHF.
Polymer Bond ∆E (kJ/mol) Mlim (kDa) Fmax (nN)
Ag(NHC-‐pTHF)2PF6 Ag-‐Ca,b 141 >13 0.5
Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 Pd-‐Ca 195 20 3.0
Pt(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 Pt-‐Ca 245 22 4.2
pTHF C-‐Cc
C-‐Oc
370
344 29d
6.9
7.6 a C represents the carbene carbon of NHC that is coordinated to the metal center bref 25 cref 41 dthis work
As summarized in Table 3, application of an external force of 2.9 nN and 4.2 nN would be
sufficient to achieve scission of the Pd–C and Pt-‐C bonds in M-‐NHC complexes respectively
at room temperature. Since these values are significantly lower than the force required to
break bonds on pTHF chain,43 M-‐ligand bonds are the most susceptible bonds on polymer
backbone to mechanical rupture. Mlim values, which were found experimentally for Pd(NHC-‐
pTHF)2Cl2, Pt(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and pTHF are in good agreement with the trend in calculated
BDE and Fmax values.
Figure 12: Chemical structure of Pd(NHC)2Cl2 that was used in calculations and change in relative
energy (a) and force (b) as a function of distance between NHC-‐Pd. Arrows on chemical structure
indicate the pulling direction.
Chain scission mechanism
In the previous section COGEF calculations were done with the constraint C1-‐Pd-‐C2 distance
as constraint. In order to understand the chain scission mechanism, however, a second
series of simulations was carried out. In mechanochemical experiments, tensile force is
transduced through the polymer chain to the central mechanophore, and the applied force
is orthogonal to C-‐Pd bond (Figure 14c). Therefore, in the calculations, pulling was also
simulated as orthogonal to NHC-‐Pd coordination bond. Ethyl groups were used instead of
long pTHF chains to reduce computational effort. The distance between two terminal
carbon atoms on different NHCs coordinated to the same Pd center was increased
sequentially from 8 to 12 Å. (Figure 13).
Mechanochemical chain scission in NHC-Pd
39
2
Figure 13: Energy optimized structures for Pd(NHC)2Cl2 while increasing the constrained distance
between the atoms indicated in black.
On the calculated curve of the energy vs. distance (Figure 14) three characteristic regions
can be seen. i) Small-‐constrained distance between the pulling ends. There is only a small
increase of the energy due to the relatively small torsional angle constraints. Here, the
distance between the central Pd and the carbon atoms does not increase.
ii) The strain in the system is sufficient to stretch the Pd-‐C bonds. This is observed as the
steep increase of the energy until the cleavage point. At this stage, the NHC and ethyl
groups lay in the same plane, and all strain imposed on the system is converted to
stretching of the Pd-‐C bond. The complex is still symmetric at this point and the distances
C1-‐Pd and C2-‐Pd are equal.
iii) At a constrained distance between terminal atoms of the complex (11.6 Å), the
symmetry of the system is broken and Pd settles much closer to the C2 atom.
Figure 14: a) Change in relative energy and b) distance between NHC-‐Pd as a function of constrained
distance. c) Chemical structure of Pd(NHC)2Cl2 that was used in calculations. d) Idealized potential
energy surface (PES) of the investigated system along the Pd-‐C1 and Pd-‐C2 bond length coordinates.
The geometry of the system has been frozen during the simulations, and the eventual distortion of
the imidazole rings is not included in the results. Arrows on chemical structure indicate the pulling
direction.
The C1-‐Pd-‐C2 bridge stretching proceeds via the path that is shown in Figure 14d. Both C-‐Pd
bonds stretch at the same rate and the energy rises along the steepest, diagonal path. Once
the energy rises above a threshold value, it is more energetically favorable to split along one
of the two directions to give C1-‐Pd or C2-‐Pd bond cleavage.
Comparison with calculations for silver carbene complex shows that scission of the Pd-‐NHC
has a higher activation barrier than scission of Ag-‐NHC bond. This explains the significant
difference in Mlims to break Ag-‐NHC and Pd-‐NHC bonds. Additionally, when the distance
between two terminal atoms increases, the most labile bond (Pd-‐C coordination bond)
breaks eventually on the chain.
Chapter 2
40
Figure 13: Energy optimized structures for Pd(NHC)2Cl2 while increasing the constrained distance
between the atoms indicated in black.
On the calculated curve of the energy vs. distance (Figure 14) three characteristic regions
can be seen. i) Small-‐constrained distance between the pulling ends. There is only a small
increase of the energy due to the relatively small torsional angle constraints. Here, the
distance between the central Pd and the carbon atoms does not increase.
ii) The strain in the system is sufficient to stretch the Pd-‐C bonds. This is observed as the
steep increase of the energy until the cleavage point. At this stage, the NHC and ethyl
groups lay in the same plane, and all strain imposed on the system is converted to
stretching of the Pd-‐C bond. The complex is still symmetric at this point and the distances
C1-‐Pd and C2-‐Pd are equal.
iii) At a constrained distance between terminal atoms of the complex (11.6 Å), the
symmetry of the system is broken and Pd settles much closer to the C2 atom.
Figure 14: a) Change in relative energy and b) distance between NHC-‐Pd as a function of constrained
distance. c) Chemical structure of Pd(NHC)2Cl2 that was used in calculations. d) Idealized potential
energy surface (PES) of the investigated system along the Pd-‐C1 and Pd-‐C2 bond length coordinates.
The geometry of the system has been frozen during the simulations, and the eventual distortion of
the imidazole rings is not included in the results. Arrows on chemical structure indicate the pulling
direction.
The C1-‐Pd-‐C2 bridge stretching proceeds via the path that is shown in Figure 14d. Both C-‐Pd
bonds stretch at the same rate and the energy rises along the steepest, diagonal path. Once
the energy rises above a threshold value, it is more energetically favorable to split along one
of the two directions to give C1-‐Pd or C2-‐Pd bond cleavage.
Comparison with calculations for silver carbene complex shows that scission of the Pd-‐NHC
has a higher activation barrier than scission of Ag-‐NHC bond. This explains the significant
difference in Mlims to break Ag-‐NHC and Pd-‐NHC bonds. Additionally, when the distance
between two terminal atoms increases, the most labile bond (Pd-‐C coordination bond)
breaks eventually on the chain.
Mechanochemical chain scission in NHC-Pd
41
2
Fmax was calculated for pulling on the terminal carbon atoms of the ethyl groups as 2.2 nN
that is significantly lower than that for pulling directly from carbene carbons (Figure 15). The
lower number indicates that although the trend in Table 3 is realistic, however, Fmax values
obtained from pulling on C1 and C2 are upper limits to break NHC-‐Pd bond mechanically and
overestimate the actual value of the force needed to break this bond.
Figure 15: Force as a function of distance between terminal atoms on the ethyl groups. Arrows on
chemical structure indicate the pulling direction. M:Pd.
Conclusions
Ultrasound induced chain scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes were investigated in
toluene. Reversibility of chain scission depends on the nature of gas molecules dissolved in
toluene and scission is reversible when the polymer complex is sonicated under CH4. Mlim for
Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 was calculated from the graph of ksc vs Mw graph as approximately 20
kDa. Critical molecular weight for the complex (Mc) determined as 60 kDa that is twice as
high as Mlim for EtIm-‐pTHF. Above Mc ultrasound induced degradation of ligands due to C-‐C
bond scission would prevent reversibility. 16 kDa complex Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 and small
molecule model complex Pd(NHC-‐ButEtIm)2Cl2 were not affected by sonication confirming
the stability of complexes when the force is lower than the threshold value to break Pd-‐NHC
bond. Scission rate is dependent on initial molecular weight of the polymer and this
indicates that chain scission has a true mechanical nature. Constrained geometry
optimization (COGEF) calculations showed that distance between NHC and Pd increases for
both NHCs coordinated to metal center and one of them breaks upon stepwise increase in
constrained distance. The results of the calculations also showed the importance of
choosing attachment points when determining the value of Fmax. This is also in agreement
with the findings on attachment point-‐reactivity relation reported by Craig et al.44–46
Results confirmed that ligands can be released from thermally stable Pd-‐NHC complexes
mechanically to produce free NHC and coordinatively unsaturated metal center, and further
use of these reactive mechano-‐chemical products is of interest.
Chapter 2
42
Fmax was calculated for pulling on the terminal carbon atoms of the ethyl groups as 2.2 nN
that is significantly lower than that for pulling directly from carbene carbons (Figure 15). The
lower number indicates that although the trend in Table 3 is realistic, however, Fmax values
obtained from pulling on C1 and C2 are upper limits to break NHC-‐Pd bond mechanically and
overestimate the actual value of the force needed to break this bond.
Figure 15: Force as a function of distance between terminal atoms on the ethyl groups. Arrows on
chemical structure indicate the pulling direction. M:Pd.
Conclusions
Ultrasound induced chain scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes were investigated in
toluene. Reversibility of chain scission depends on the nature of gas molecules dissolved in
toluene and scission is reversible when the polymer complex is sonicated under CH4. Mlim for
Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 was calculated from the graph of ksc vs Mw graph as approximately 20
kDa. Critical molecular weight for the complex (Mc) determined as 60 kDa that is twice as
high as Mlim for EtIm-‐pTHF. Above Mc ultrasound induced degradation of ligands due to C-‐C
bond scission would prevent reversibility. 16 kDa complex Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 and small
molecule model complex Pd(NHC-‐ButEtIm)2Cl2 were not affected by sonication confirming
the stability of complexes when the force is lower than the threshold value to break Pd-‐NHC
bond. Scission rate is dependent on initial molecular weight of the polymer and this
indicates that chain scission has a true mechanical nature. Constrained geometry
optimization (COGEF) calculations showed that distance between NHC and Pd increases for
both NHCs coordinated to metal center and one of them breaks upon stepwise increase in
constrained distance. The results of the calculations also showed the importance of
choosing attachment points when determining the value of Fmax. This is also in agreement
with the findings on attachment point-‐reactivity relation reported by Craig et al.44–46
Results confirmed that ligands can be released from thermally stable Pd-‐NHC complexes
mechanically to produce free NHC and coordinatively unsaturated metal center, and further
use of these reactive mechano-‐chemical products is of interest.
Mechanochemical chain scission in NHC-Pd
43
2
Experimental
General
All chemicals were purchased from commercial sources used without further purification, unless
specified otherwise. Dry tetrahydrofuran (THF, HPLC grade) was degassed with argon and purified by
passage through activated alumina solvent column prior to use. A Varian 400MR or a Varian Mercury
400 spectrometer was used to record 1H NMR (400 MHz) Chemical shifts are reported in ppm and
referenced to tetramethylsilane or solvent. Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) was performed
on a Shimadzu LC10-‐AD, using Polymer Laboratories PL Gel 5μm MIXED-‐C and MIXEDD columns
(linear range of MW: 200–2000000 g/mol), a Shimadzu SPD-‐M10A UV-‐vis detector at 254 nm and
RID-‐10A refractive index detector, and THF as eluent at a flow rate of 1 mL/min (20 °C). Polystyrene
standards were used for calibration.
Sonication experiments
A homemade, double-‐jacketed glass reactor with a volume of 10 mL was used in the sonication
experiments. A Sonics and Materials 20 kHz, 0.5 in. diameter titanium alloy ultrasound probe with
half wave extension (parts 630-‐0220 and 630-‐0410) was operated using a Sonics and Materials
VC750 power supply. The temperature in the reactor was maintained with a Lauda E300 cooling
bath and measured using a 0.5 mm diameter thermocouple. Solutions were sonicated continuously,
temperature of the solution was checked by thermocouple and it was constant at 20oC after the
thermal equilibrium was achieved in the first 3-‐5 mins. During sonication saturation a gas (Ar or CH4)
was bubbled through solution via teflon tubing. Aliquots of 100 µL were taken at different time
intervals. Toluene was removed under reduced pressure and residues were dissolved in THF and
submitted to GPC. GPC results were analyzed and scission kinetics was determined by double
Gaussian de-‐convolution method.
Synthesis of α-‐(N-‐ethylimidazolium)-‐ω-‐methoxy poly(tetrahydrofuran)
Polymer salts precursor to ligand NHC-‐pTHF were synthesized via cationic ring-‐opening
polymerization of tetrahydrofuran (THF).47 THF (100 mL) and DTBP (200 µL, 0.92 mmol) were added
methyl triflate (100 µL, 0.91 mmol) inside a Schlenk round-‐bottom flask under Ar to initiate the
polymerization. After stirring for defined time (Figure S1), the polymerization was terminated by N-‐
ethylimidazole (200 µL, ca. 2.1 mmol). After 20 mins, solution was diluted to app ¼ of its initial
volume and precipitated in water (400 mL) overnight at ambient temperature. White polymer was
washed with water, dissolved in diethyl ether (200 mL), dried over MgSO4 and precipitated overnight
at –30 °C, white powder was filtered washed with cold Et2O and yielded ligands as white powder. Ion
exchange of the anion to chloride was carried out by stirring the polymer with Dowex® exchange
resin in methanol for 2–3 hours. Then, the resin was removed by filtration and the methanol was
evaporated in vacuo and the residue was precipitated in Et2O at -‐30oC again. In order to remove
traces of solvents, ligands were left under vacuum at ambient temperature overnight prior to use. 1H
NMR [EtIm-‐pTHF12kCl CD2Cl2, 400 MHz]: 11 ppm (s, NHC), 7.2 ppm (d, NHC), 4.4 ppm (t, N-‐CH2) 3.0-‐
3.6 ppm (br O-‐CH2-‐), 1.3-‐2.2 ppm (br, OCH2-‐CH2).
Synthesis of Pd(II)–NHC polymer complexes Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2.
EtIm-‐pTHF (400 mg) was dissolved in THF (10 ml) and stirred over 4A molecular sieves for 30 mins
under Ar. NatOBu (2.5 eq.) was added in one portion and solution stirred for another 30 Å mins.
Then, Pd(PhCN)2Cl2 (0.5 eq.) was added and ligand exchange yielded desired polymer attached
mechanophores. Crude products were filtered over alumina (eluent: THF), and concentrated under
reduced pressure. Then, the complex was dissolved in DCM washed with water and dried over
MgSO4. Solution containing Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 in DCM passed through Celite. Solvent was
evaporated under reduced pressure and light yellow polymer was left under vacuum overnight to
remove all residual solvents. 1H NMR [Pd(NHC-‐pTHF12k)2Cl2 CD2Cl2, 400 MHz]: 6.9 ppm (s, NHC), 4.5
ppm (t, N-‐CH2), 3.0-‐3.5 ppm (br, O-‐CH2-‐), 1.1-‐1.9 ppm (br, OCH2-‐CH2-‐).
Synthesis of model complex Pd(NHC-‐EtBut)2Cl2
Ethyl imidazole (480 mg, 5 mmol) and iodobutane (1840 mg, 10 mmol) were refluxed in dry THF (25
ml) overnight. Then, two-‐phase liquid reaction mixture was cooled down to room temperature and
upper transparent part was removed with glass pipette. Yellow oily product was washed with THF
(10 ml x 3) and then residue was dissolved in MeOH (10 ml). Ion exchange resin was added to
exchange iodine counterions with chlorine. After stirring 2h at RT mixture was filtered over a filter
paper, solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and light yellow oil was left under vacuum
overnight.
EtButIm (100 mg, 0.53 mmol), PdCl2 (46 mg, 0.26 mmol) and Cs2CO3 (814.5 mg, 2.5 mmol) were
dissolved in Dioxane (4.4 mL) and the reaction mixture was heated to 80 °C. After 5 hours, it was
allowed to cool down to room temperature. Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure.
Purification by column chromatography (CH2Cl2) afforded Pd(NHC-‐EtBut)2Cl2 as a light yellow solid.
Chapter 2
44
Experimental
General
All chemicals were purchased from commercial sources used without further purification, unless
specified otherwise. Dry tetrahydrofuran (THF, HPLC grade) was degassed with argon and purified by
passage through activated alumina solvent column prior to use. A Varian 400MR or a Varian Mercury
400 spectrometer was used to record 1H NMR (400 MHz) Chemical shifts are reported in ppm and
referenced to tetramethylsilane or solvent. Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) was performed
on a Shimadzu LC10-‐AD, using Polymer Laboratories PL Gel 5μm MIXED-‐C and MIXEDD columns
(linear range of MW: 200–2000000 g/mol), a Shimadzu SPD-‐M10A UV-‐vis detector at 254 nm and
RID-‐10A refractive index detector, and THF as eluent at a flow rate of 1 mL/min (20 °C). Polystyrene
standards were used for calibration.
Sonication experiments
A homemade, double-‐jacketed glass reactor with a volume of 10 mL was used in the sonication
experiments. A Sonics and Materials 20 kHz, 0.5 in. diameter titanium alloy ultrasound probe with
half wave extension (parts 630-‐0220 and 630-‐0410) was operated using a Sonics and Materials
VC750 power supply. The temperature in the reactor was maintained with a Lauda E300 cooling
bath and measured using a 0.5 mm diameter thermocouple. Solutions were sonicated continuously,
temperature of the solution was checked by thermocouple and it was constant at 20oC after the
thermal equilibrium was achieved in the first 3-‐5 mins. During sonication saturation a gas (Ar or CH4)
was bubbled through solution via teflon tubing. Aliquots of 100 µL were taken at different time
intervals. Toluene was removed under reduced pressure and residues were dissolved in THF and
submitted to GPC. GPC results were analyzed and scission kinetics was determined by double
Gaussian de-‐convolution method.
Synthesis of α-‐(N-‐ethylimidazolium)-‐ω-‐methoxy poly(tetrahydrofuran)
Polymer salts precursor to ligand NHC-‐pTHF were synthesized via cationic ring-‐opening
polymerization of tetrahydrofuran (THF).47 THF (100 mL) and DTBP (200 µL, 0.92 mmol) were added
methyl triflate (100 µL, 0.91 mmol) inside a Schlenk round-‐bottom flask under Ar to initiate the
polymerization. After stirring for defined time (Figure S1), the polymerization was terminated by N-‐
ethylimidazole (200 µL, ca. 2.1 mmol). After 20 mins, solution was diluted to app ¼ of its initial
volume and precipitated in water (400 mL) overnight at ambient temperature. White polymer was
washed with water, dissolved in diethyl ether (200 mL), dried over MgSO4 and precipitated overnight
at –30 °C, white powder was filtered washed with cold Et2O and yielded ligands as white powder. Ion
exchange of the anion to chloride was carried out by stirring the polymer with Dowex® exchange
resin in methanol for 2–3 hours. Then, the resin was removed by filtration and the methanol was
evaporated in vacuo and the residue was precipitated in Et2O at -‐30oC again. In order to remove
traces of solvents, ligands were left under vacuum at ambient temperature overnight prior to use. 1H
NMR [EtIm-‐pTHF12kCl CD2Cl2, 400 MHz]: 11 ppm (s, NHC), 7.2 ppm (d, NHC), 4.4 ppm (t, N-‐CH2) 3.0-‐
3.6 ppm (br O-‐CH2-‐), 1.3-‐2.2 ppm (br, OCH2-‐CH2).
Synthesis of Pd(II)–NHC polymer complexes Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2.
EtIm-‐pTHF (400 mg) was dissolved in THF (10 ml) and stirred over 4A molecular sieves for 30 mins
under Ar. NatOBu (2.5 eq.) was added in one portion and solution stirred for another 30 Å mins.
Then, Pd(PhCN)2Cl2 (0.5 eq.) was added and ligand exchange yielded desired polymer attached
mechanophores. Crude products were filtered over alumina (eluent: THF), and concentrated under
reduced pressure. Then, the complex was dissolved in DCM washed with water and dried over
MgSO4. Solution containing Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 in DCM passed through Celite. Solvent was
evaporated under reduced pressure and light yellow polymer was left under vacuum overnight to
remove all residual solvents. 1H NMR [Pd(NHC-‐pTHF12k)2Cl2 CD2Cl2, 400 MHz]: 6.9 ppm (s, NHC), 4.5
ppm (t, N-‐CH2), 3.0-‐3.5 ppm (br, O-‐CH2-‐), 1.1-‐1.9 ppm (br, OCH2-‐CH2-‐).
Synthesis of model complex Pd(NHC-‐EtBut)2Cl2
Ethyl imidazole (480 mg, 5 mmol) and iodobutane (1840 mg, 10 mmol) were refluxed in dry THF (25
ml) overnight. Then, two-‐phase liquid reaction mixture was cooled down to room temperature and
upper transparent part was removed with glass pipette. Yellow oily product was washed with THF
(10 ml x 3) and then residue was dissolved in MeOH (10 ml). Ion exchange resin was added to
exchange iodine counterions with chlorine. After stirring 2h at RT mixture was filtered over a filter
paper, solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and light yellow oil was left under vacuum
overnight.
EtButIm (100 mg, 0.53 mmol), PdCl2 (46 mg, 0.26 mmol) and Cs2CO3 (814.5 mg, 2.5 mmol) were
dissolved in Dioxane (4.4 mL) and the reaction mixture was heated to 80 °C. After 5 hours, it was
allowed to cool down to room temperature. Volatiles were removed under reduced pressure.
Purification by column chromatography (CH2Cl2) afforded Pd(NHC-‐EtBut)2Cl2 as a light yellow solid.
Mechanochemical chain scission in NHC-Pd
45
2
1H NMR spectra for EtButIm and Pd(NHC-‐EtBut)2Cl2.
References
(1) Kryger, M. J.; Ong, M. T.; Odom, S. A.; Sottos, N. R.; White, S. R.; Martinez, T. J.; Moore, J. S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (13), 4558–4559.
(2) Klukovich, H. M.; Kean, Z. S.; Iacono, S. T.; Craig, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (44), 17882–
17888.
(3) Brantley, J. N.; Wiggins, K. M.; Bielawski, C. W. Science 2011, 333 (6049), 1606–1609.
(4) Karthikeyan, S.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat Chem 2010, 2 (6), 436–437.
(5) Jakobs, R. T. M.; Sijbesma, R. P. Organometallics 2012, 31 (6), 2476–2481.
(6) Powell, A. B.; Bielawski, C. W.; Cowley, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (29), 10184–10194.
(7) Caruso, M. M.; Davis, D. A.; Shen, Q.; Odom, S. A.; Sottos, N. R.; White, S. R.; Moore, J. S.
Chem. Rev. 2009, 109 (11), 5755–5798.
(8) Kuijpers, M. W. A.; Iedema, P. D.; Kemmere, M. F.; Keurentjes, J. T. F. Polymer 2004, 45 (19),
6461–6467.
(9) Odell, J. A.; Muller, A. J.; Narh, K. A.; Keller, A. Macromolecules 1990, 23 (12), 3092–3103.
(10) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43 (34), 4460–4462.
(11) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Huijbers, J. P. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Macromolecules 2005, 38 (15), 6290–6298.
(12) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2006, 44 (19), 5445–5453.
(13) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Chem. Commun. 2008, No. 37, 4416–4418.
(14) Johansson Seechurn, C. C. C.; Kitching, M. O.; Colacot, T. J.; Snieckus, V. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2012, 51 (21), 5062–5085.
(15) Hopkinson, M. N.; Richter, C.; Schedler, M.; Glorius, F. Nature 2014, 510 (7506), 485–496.
(16) Valente, C.; Çalimsiz, S.; Hoi, K. H.; Mallik, D.; Sayah, M.; Organ, M. G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2012, 51 (14), 3314–3332.
(17) Herrmann, W. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41 (8), 1290–1309.
(18) O’Brien, C. J.; Kantchev, E. A. B.; Valente, C.; Hadei, N.; Chass, G. A.; Lough, A.; Hopkinson, A.
C.; Organ, M. G. Chem. – Eur. J. 2006, 12 (18), 4743–4748.
(19) Kantchev, E. A. B.; O’Brien, C. J.; Organ, M. G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46 (16), 2768–
2813.
(20) Organ, M. G.; Avola, S.; Dubovyk, I.; Hadei, N.; Kantchev, E. A. B.; O’Brien, C. J.; Valente, C.
Chem. – Eur. J. 2006, 12 (18), 4749–4755.
(21) O’Brien, C. J.; Kantchev, E. A. B.; Chass, G. A.; Hadei, N.; Hopkinson, A. C.; Organ, M. G.;
Setiadi, D. H.; Tang, T.-‐H.; Fang, D.-‐C. Tetrahedron 2005, 61 (41), 9723–9735.
(22) Christmann, U.; Vilar, R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44 (3), 366–374.
(23) Phan, N. T. S.; Van Der Sluys, M.; Jones, C. W. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348 (6), 609–679.
(24) Marion, N.; Nolan, S. P. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41 (11), 1440–1449.
(25) Karthikeyan, S.; Potisek, S. L.; Piermattei, A.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130 (45),
14968–14969.
(26) Szwarc, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1948, 16 (2), 128–136.
(27) Huynh, H. V.; Han, Y.; Jothibasu, R.; Yang, J. A. Organometallics 2009, 28 (18), 5395–5404.
(28) Liu, S.-‐T.; Lee, C.-‐I.; Fu, C.-‐F.; Chen, C.-‐H.; Liu, Y.-‐H.; Elsevier, C. J.; Peng, S.-‐M.; Chen, J.-‐T.
Organometallics 2009, 28 (24), 6957–6962.
(29) Nakano, A.; Minoura, Y. Macromolecules 1975, 8 (5), 677–680.
(30) Ribas-‐Arino, J.; Shiga, M.; Marx, D. Chem. – Eur. J. 2009, 15 (48), 13331–13335.
(31) Wiggins, K. M.; Brantley, J. N.; Bielawski, C. W. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42 (17), 7130–7147.
(32) Groote, R.; Szyja, B. M.; Pidko, E. A.; Hensen, E. J. M.; Sijbesma, R. P. Macromolecules 2011,
44 (23), 9187–9195.
(33) Groote, R.; van Haandel, L.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2012, 50 (23),
4929–4935.
(34) Madras, G.; Chung, G. Y.; Smith, J. M.; McCoy, B. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997, 36 (6), 2019–
2024.
(35) Vijayalakshmi, S. P.; Madras, G. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005, 90 (1), 116–122.
(36) Kryger, M. J.; Munaretto, A. M.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (46), 18992–18998.
(37) Adamo, C.; Barone, V. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110 (13), 6158–6170.
(38) Schäfer, A.; Huber, C.; Ahlrichs, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100 (8), 5829–5835.
(39) Blanksby, S. J.; Ellison, G. B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36 (4), 255–263.
Chapter 2
46
1H NMR spectra for EtButIm and Pd(NHC-‐EtBut)2Cl2.
References
(1) Kryger, M. J.; Ong, M. T.; Odom, S. A.; Sottos, N. R.; White, S. R.; Martinez, T. J.; Moore, J. S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (13), 4558–4559.
(2) Klukovich, H. M.; Kean, Z. S.; Iacono, S. T.; Craig, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (44), 17882–
17888.
(3) Brantley, J. N.; Wiggins, K. M.; Bielawski, C. W. Science 2011, 333 (6049), 1606–1609.
(4) Karthikeyan, S.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat Chem 2010, 2 (6), 436–437.
(5) Jakobs, R. T. M.; Sijbesma, R. P. Organometallics 2012, 31 (6), 2476–2481.
(6) Powell, A. B.; Bielawski, C. W.; Cowley, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (29), 10184–10194.
(7) Caruso, M. M.; Davis, D. A.; Shen, Q.; Odom, S. A.; Sottos, N. R.; White, S. R.; Moore, J. S.
Chem. Rev. 2009, 109 (11), 5755–5798.
(8) Kuijpers, M. W. A.; Iedema, P. D.; Kemmere, M. F.; Keurentjes, J. T. F. Polymer 2004, 45 (19),
6461–6467.
(9) Odell, J. A.; Muller, A. J.; Narh, K. A.; Keller, A. Macromolecules 1990, 23 (12), 3092–3103.
(10) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43 (34), 4460–4462.
(11) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Huijbers, J. P. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Macromolecules 2005, 38 (15), 6290–6298.
(12) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2006, 44 (19), 5445–5453.
(13) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Chem. Commun. 2008, No. 37, 4416–4418.
(14) Johansson Seechurn, C. C. C.; Kitching, M. O.; Colacot, T. J.; Snieckus, V. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2012, 51 (21), 5062–5085.
(15) Hopkinson, M. N.; Richter, C.; Schedler, M.; Glorius, F. Nature 2014, 510 (7506), 485–496.
(16) Valente, C.; Çalimsiz, S.; Hoi, K. H.; Mallik, D.; Sayah, M.; Organ, M. G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2012, 51 (14), 3314–3332.
(17) Herrmann, W. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41 (8), 1290–1309.
(18) O’Brien, C. J.; Kantchev, E. A. B.; Valente, C.; Hadei, N.; Chass, G. A.; Lough, A.; Hopkinson, A.
C.; Organ, M. G. Chem. – Eur. J. 2006, 12 (18), 4743–4748.
(19) Kantchev, E. A. B.; O’Brien, C. J.; Organ, M. G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46 (16), 2768–
2813.
(20) Organ, M. G.; Avola, S.; Dubovyk, I.; Hadei, N.; Kantchev, E. A. B.; O’Brien, C. J.; Valente, C.
Chem. – Eur. J. 2006, 12 (18), 4749–4755.
(21) O’Brien, C. J.; Kantchev, E. A. B.; Chass, G. A.; Hadei, N.; Hopkinson, A. C.; Organ, M. G.;
Setiadi, D. H.; Tang, T.-‐H.; Fang, D.-‐C. Tetrahedron 2005, 61 (41), 9723–9735.
(22) Christmann, U.; Vilar, R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44 (3), 366–374.
(23) Phan, N. T. S.; Van Der Sluys, M.; Jones, C. W. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348 (6), 609–679.
(24) Marion, N.; Nolan, S. P. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41 (11), 1440–1449.
(25) Karthikeyan, S.; Potisek, S. L.; Piermattei, A.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130 (45),
14968–14969.
(26) Szwarc, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1948, 16 (2), 128–136.
(27) Huynh, H. V.; Han, Y.; Jothibasu, R.; Yang, J. A. Organometallics 2009, 28 (18), 5395–5404.
(28) Liu, S.-‐T.; Lee, C.-‐I.; Fu, C.-‐F.; Chen, C.-‐H.; Liu, Y.-‐H.; Elsevier, C. J.; Peng, S.-‐M.; Chen, J.-‐T.
Organometallics 2009, 28 (24), 6957–6962.
(29) Nakano, A.; Minoura, Y. Macromolecules 1975, 8 (5), 677–680.
(30) Ribas-‐Arino, J.; Shiga, M.; Marx, D. Chem. – Eur. J. 2009, 15 (48), 13331–13335.
(31) Wiggins, K. M.; Brantley, J. N.; Bielawski, C. W. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42 (17), 7130–7147.
(32) Groote, R.; Szyja, B. M.; Pidko, E. A.; Hensen, E. J. M.; Sijbesma, R. P. Macromolecules 2011,
44 (23), 9187–9195.
(33) Groote, R.; van Haandel, L.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2012, 50 (23),
4929–4935.
(34) Madras, G.; Chung, G. Y.; Smith, J. M.; McCoy, B. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997, 36 (6), 2019–
2024.
(35) Vijayalakshmi, S. P.; Madras, G. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005, 90 (1), 116–122.
(36) Kryger, M. J.; Munaretto, A. M.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (46), 18992–18998.
(37) Adamo, C.; Barone, V. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110 (13), 6158–6170.
(38) Schäfer, A.; Huber, C.; Ahlrichs, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100 (8), 5829–5835.
(39) Blanksby, S. J.; Ellison, G. B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36 (4), 255–263.
Mechanochemical chain scission in NHC-Pd
47
2
(40) Bell, G. I. Science 1978, 200 (4342), 618–627.
(41) Evans, E.; Ritchie, K. Biophys. J. 1997, 72 (4), 1541–1555.
(42) Kucharski, T. J.; Boulatov, R. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21 (23), 8237–8255.
(43) Beyer, M. K. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112 (17), 7307–7312.
(44) Gossweiler, G. R.; Kouznetsova, T. B.; Craig, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (19), 6148–6151.
(45) Wang, J.; Kouznetsova, T. B.; Kean, Z. S.; Fan, L.; Mar, B. D.; Martínez, T. J.; Craig, S. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (43), 15162–15165.
(46) Brown, C. L.; Craig, S. L. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6 (4), 2158–2165.
(47) Dubreuil, M. F.; Farcy, N. G.; Goethals, E. J. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 1999, 20 (7), 383–386.
Chapter 2
48
Chapter 3Mechanical scission of Pd(NHC)2Cl2 complexes probed with chemiluminescence
Polytetrahydrofuran (pTHF) functionalized N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) ligand has been
dissociated mechanically from Pd(NHC-pTHF)2Cl2 complex. A 2-coumaranone derivative,
which decomposes via a chemiluminescent pathway once deprotonated, was used to moni-
tor scission event. Chemiluminescence of coumaranone involves the formation of thermally
labile 1,2-dioxetanone that requires molecular oxygen to form. Therefore, ultrasound was
applied in air-saturated toluene. Influence of saturation gas on the scission rate and molecu-
lar weight threshold (Mlim) for mechanochemical chain scission was determined.
(40) Bell, G. I. Science 1978, 200 (4342), 618–627.
(41) Evans, E.; Ritchie, K. Biophys. J. 1997, 72 (4), 1541–1555.
(42) Kucharski, T. J.; Boulatov, R. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21 (23), 8237–8255.
(43) Beyer, M. K. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112 (17), 7307–7312.
(44) Gossweiler, G. R.; Kouznetsova, T. B.; Craig, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (19), 6148–6151.
(45) Wang, J.; Kouznetsova, T. B.; Kean, Z. S.; Fan, L.; Mar, B. D.; Martínez, T. J.; Craig, S. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (43), 15162–15165.
(46) Brown, C. L.; Craig, S. L. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6 (4), 2158–2165.
(47) Dubreuil, M. F.; Farcy, N. G.; Goethals, E. J. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 1999, 20 (7), 383–386.
Introduction
N-‐heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs)1 are nucleophilic and highly basic molecules, which have
been used in various organic transformations, including condensation, transesterification
and ring-‐opening reactions.2,3 Although they are highly reactive towards various substrates
in their free form, their reactivity can be masked in thermally labile precursors.4 NHC−metal
complexes have been applied as thermally latent catalysts in a number of polymerization
reactions.5–9
Mechanical activation of chemical bonds offers an alternative to conventional processes
such as thermal or photochemical activation.12 Mechanical work done by an external force
lowers the energy barrier for bond dissociation to such an extent that thermal fluctuations
can exceed this barrier at room temperature.13 For efficient transduction of applied external
force onto mechanically labile bonds of molecules in solution, attachment of polymer chains
is required. Incorporation of functional groups with mechanically responsive labile bonds
(“mechanophores”) into polymers has provided materials that are sensitive to mechanical
stimuli and led to useful strain induced molecular transformations. Mechanoresponsive
materials have gained more interest over the last decade; e.g. materials that change color
upon strain or heal microcracks autonomously by use of proper mechanophores have been
developed.14,15
Polymer attached NHC−metal complexes, for instance Ag(NHC-‐pTHF)2PF6, have been utilized
in our group as latent mechanochemical catalysts.10,11 Coordination bonds in these
complexes were broken mechanically to release free NHC, which then catalyzed
transesterification reactions. In the previous chapter of this thesis, it was shown that
Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes can also be used as thermally stable mechanoresponsive
coordination polymers to release NHC upon sonication.
Recently, our group reported the development of a mechano-‐luminescent material based
on a polymer-‐functionalized 1,2-‐dioxetane moiety.16 Dioxetanes are organic peroxides and
efficient sources of electronically excited products upon chemical or thermal treatments.17
Opening of a four-‐membered 1,2-‐dioxetane ring with two adjacent oxygen atoms yields two
carbonyl groups, one of which is in an electronically excited state and emits a photon (at
420 nm) on relaxation. Bis(adamantyl)-‐substituted 1,2-‐dioxetane is thermally stable at room
temperature and has been successfully activated mechanically by straining polymer samples
that covalently incorporate the luminescent unit in poly(methylacrylate) chains.
Experiments have shown that dioxetanes can be used as mechanochemical-‐probe for
spatiotemporal mapping and chain scission in polymers. A limitation of using the dioxetane
unit as a mechanophore is that for a given dioxetane, the barrier to scission is fixed. The
currently employed bisadamantyl dioxetane has a scission barrier of 155 kJ/mol, and is
thermally stable up to ~200 oC.16,18 Lowering the barrier for decomposition by reducing the
steric bulk of the dioxetane will also reduce its thermal stability. Therefore, it is of interest
to develop an alternative scheme for mechanoluminescene in which luminescence is
induced chemically by deprotonation of a chemiluminescent probe by a mechanochemically
released base, such as an NHC-‐group. Such a scheme was first explored in collaboration with
Jessica Clough in our group, by studying the release of NHC from polymeric Ag-‐carbene
complexes, to initiate base induced chemiluminescence of 2-‐Coumaranone. Although
luminescence was indeed observed, the thermal lability of the Ag complexes prevented
detailed analysis of the mechanochemical effects. In the current Chapter, the use of
Pd(NHC)2Cl2 complexes for mechanochemical release of NHC for the base induced
chemiluminescence of coumaranone is investigated.
2-‐Coumaranones
Lofthouse et al. reported the synthesis and chemiluminescence of 2-‐coumaranone
derivatives in 1979.19 They reported that dimethylformamide solutions of coumaranone
derivatives emit violet light in the presence of triethylamine, at room temperature under
air. Later, Schramm et al. reported a systematic study of the mechanism of this reaction. By
isolating the decomposition products they established that the chemiluminescent step
involves the formation and decomposition of an unstable 1,2-‐dioxetanone intermediate.20
Because the proposed 1,2-‐dioxetanone intermediate decomposes rapidly, it has not been
isolated so far, but indirect proof for its existence comes from the study of charge transfer
complexes with perylene. 21,22
Investigation of decomposition mechanisms for 1,2-‐dioxetanone under sonication
conditions is a subject of a separate study in our laboratories and beyond the scope of this
thesis.
Chapter 3
50
Introduction
N-‐heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs)1 are nucleophilic and highly basic molecules, which have
been used in various organic transformations, including condensation, transesterification
and ring-‐opening reactions.2,3 Although they are highly reactive towards various substrates
in their free form, their reactivity can be masked in thermally labile precursors.4 NHC−metal
complexes have been applied as thermally latent catalysts in a number of polymerization
reactions.5–9
Mechanical activation of chemical bonds offers an alternative to conventional processes
such as thermal or photochemical activation.12 Mechanical work done by an external force
lowers the energy barrier for bond dissociation to such an extent that thermal fluctuations
can exceed this barrier at room temperature.13 For efficient transduction of applied external
force onto mechanically labile bonds of molecules in solution, attachment of polymer chains
is required. Incorporation of functional groups with mechanically responsive labile bonds
(“mechanophores”) into polymers has provided materials that are sensitive to mechanical
stimuli and led to useful strain induced molecular transformations. Mechanoresponsive
materials have gained more interest over the last decade; e.g. materials that change color
upon strain or heal microcracks autonomously by use of proper mechanophores have been
developed.14,15
Polymer attached NHC−metal complexes, for instance Ag(NHC-‐pTHF)2PF6, have been utilized
in our group as latent mechanochemical catalysts.10,11 Coordination bonds in these
complexes were broken mechanically to release free NHC, which then catalyzed
transesterification reactions. In the previous chapter of this thesis, it was shown that
Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes can also be used as thermally stable mechanoresponsive
coordination polymers to release NHC upon sonication.
Recently, our group reported the development of a mechano-‐luminescent material based
on a polymer-‐functionalized 1,2-‐dioxetane moiety.16 Dioxetanes are organic peroxides and
efficient sources of electronically excited products upon chemical or thermal treatments.17
Opening of a four-‐membered 1,2-‐dioxetane ring with two adjacent oxygen atoms yields two
carbonyl groups, one of which is in an electronically excited state and emits a photon (at
420 nm) on relaxation. Bis(adamantyl)-‐substituted 1,2-‐dioxetane is thermally stable at room
temperature and has been successfully activated mechanically by straining polymer samples
that covalently incorporate the luminescent unit in poly(methylacrylate) chains.
Experiments have shown that dioxetanes can be used as mechanochemical-‐probe for
spatiotemporal mapping and chain scission in polymers. A limitation of using the dioxetane
unit as a mechanophore is that for a given dioxetane, the barrier to scission is fixed. The
currently employed bisadamantyl dioxetane has a scission barrier of 155 kJ/mol, and is
thermally stable up to ~200 oC.16,18 Lowering the barrier for decomposition by reducing the
steric bulk of the dioxetane will also reduce its thermal stability. Therefore, it is of interest
to develop an alternative scheme for mechanoluminescene in which luminescence is
induced chemically by deprotonation of a chemiluminescent probe by a mechanochemically
released base, such as an NHC-‐group. Such a scheme was first explored in collaboration with
Jessica Clough in our group, by studying the release of NHC from polymeric Ag-‐carbene
complexes, to initiate base induced chemiluminescence of 2-‐Coumaranone. Although
luminescence was indeed observed, the thermal lability of the Ag complexes prevented
detailed analysis of the mechanochemical effects. In the current Chapter, the use of
Pd(NHC)2Cl2 complexes for mechanochemical release of NHC for the base induced
chemiluminescence of coumaranone is investigated.
2-‐Coumaranones
Lofthouse et al. reported the synthesis and chemiluminescence of 2-‐coumaranone
derivatives in 1979.19 They reported that dimethylformamide solutions of coumaranone
derivatives emit violet light in the presence of triethylamine, at room temperature under
air. Later, Schramm et al. reported a systematic study of the mechanism of this reaction. By
isolating the decomposition products they established that the chemiluminescent step
involves the formation and decomposition of an unstable 1,2-‐dioxetanone intermediate.20
Because the proposed 1,2-‐dioxetanone intermediate decomposes rapidly, it has not been
isolated so far, but indirect proof for its existence comes from the study of charge transfer
complexes with perylene. 21,22
Investigation of decomposition mechanisms for 1,2-‐dioxetanone under sonication
conditions is a subject of a separate study in our laboratories and beyond the scope of this
thesis.
Mechanically induced chemiluminescence
51
3
Results and discussions
Chain scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes in the presence of coumaranone
In order to investigate chain scission in polymers, Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 (0.2 mM) and
coumaranone (0.2 mM) were sonicated in toluene for 60 min using a sonication probe. It
has been shown that chemiluminescent decomposition of coumaranone requires
deprotonation followed by a reaction with molecular oxygen.20 Therefore, dry air was
bubbled through the solution during sonication providing a constant stream of gas, which
contains both molecular oxygen required for dioxetanone formation and nitrogen as
cavitation gas. The double-‐jacketed sonication vessel was cooled down to 2oC by water
circulation from a thermostat-‐controlled bath. The temperature inside the sonication vessel
was monitored with a thermocouple and recorded as below 30 oC during sonication after
thermal equilibration for approximately 5 min.
Molecular weights of complexes were determined with MALDI-‐TOF as shown in the
previous chapter. Bimodal distributions obtained with GPC were fitted with double Gaussian
function, which gives the best fit for selective midpoint scission of a weak metal–ligand
coordination bonds, to determine initial weight fractions of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes.
The two peaks of the bimodal distribution were assumed to have the same polydispersity so
peak widths were fixed. Areas under GPC traces were calculated from the fits and were
normalized to total peak area (i.e. A1+A2=1). Concentration of starting material C1 at each
sonication time t is proportional to the relative peak area in RI detection:
𝐶𝐶! 𝑡𝑡 = 𝐴𝐴! 𝑡𝑡
Polymer degradation during sonication follows first-‐order kinetics and weight fraction of
starting material C1 decays exponentially with the equation; 𝐶𝐶! 𝑡𝑡 = 𝐶𝐶! 0 ×𝑒𝑒 !!!"! where
ksc is mechanochemical scission rate coefficient and t is sonication time. Exponential fitting
of C1(t)/C1(0) vs t graph reveals the scission rate coefficient ksc (R2=0.99) that ranges
between 0.005 and 0.065 min-‐1. Chain scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes under air in
the presence of 2-‐coumaranone increases from 20% to 98% for the initial MW of the
polymer complexes 16 kDa and 50kDa respectively.
GPC traces showed the formation of polymer species with half of the initial MW during
sonication (Figure 1), confirming that scission takes place and is not reversible, as is
expected when free NHC is protonated by the presence of 2-‐coumaranone. GPC traces
taken after different time intervals during sonication show two distinct peaks corresponding
to initial and broken polymer fractions. Such behavior is usually not observed for
polydisperse polymers without a weak bond (see for example ref 23) and suggests that
scission is selective for the mid-‐chain coordination bond.
In the presence of 2-‐coumaranone under air, Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 showed ≈90% chain
scission after 1h of continuous sonication, while 55% scission was observed after sonicating
for 1h under CH4 with AcOH and MeCN as trapping agents. The highest molecular weight
complex Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 was broken completely (≥ 98%) in 1h, with 25 kDa polymer
as the only polymeric product and complete disappearance of the 50kDa peak
corresponding to the complex (Figure 1d).
Chapter 3
52
Results and discussions
Chain scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes in the presence of coumaranone
In order to investigate chain scission in polymers, Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 (0.2 mM) and
coumaranone (0.2 mM) were sonicated in toluene for 60 min using a sonication probe. It
has been shown that chemiluminescent decomposition of coumaranone requires
deprotonation followed by a reaction with molecular oxygen.20 Therefore, dry air was
bubbled through the solution during sonication providing a constant stream of gas, which
contains both molecular oxygen required for dioxetanone formation and nitrogen as
cavitation gas. The double-‐jacketed sonication vessel was cooled down to 2oC by water
circulation from a thermostat-‐controlled bath. The temperature inside the sonication vessel
was monitored with a thermocouple and recorded as below 30 oC during sonication after
thermal equilibration for approximately 5 min.
Molecular weights of complexes were determined with MALDI-‐TOF as shown in the
previous chapter. Bimodal distributions obtained with GPC were fitted with double Gaussian
function, which gives the best fit for selective midpoint scission of a weak metal–ligand
coordination bonds, to determine initial weight fractions of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes.
The two peaks of the bimodal distribution were assumed to have the same polydispersity so
peak widths were fixed. Areas under GPC traces were calculated from the fits and were
normalized to total peak area (i.e. A1+A2=1). Concentration of starting material C1 at each
sonication time t is proportional to the relative peak area in RI detection:
𝐶𝐶! 𝑡𝑡 = 𝐴𝐴! 𝑡𝑡
Polymer degradation during sonication follows first-‐order kinetics and weight fraction of
starting material C1 decays exponentially with the equation; 𝐶𝐶! 𝑡𝑡 = 𝐶𝐶! 0 ×𝑒𝑒 !!!"! where
ksc is mechanochemical scission rate coefficient and t is sonication time. Exponential fitting
of C1(t)/C1(0) vs t graph reveals the scission rate coefficient ksc (R2=0.99) that ranges
between 0.005 and 0.065 min-‐1. Chain scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes under air in
the presence of 2-‐coumaranone increases from 20% to 98% for the initial MW of the
polymer complexes 16 kDa and 50kDa respectively.
GPC traces showed the formation of polymer species with half of the initial MW during
sonication (Figure 1), confirming that scission takes place and is not reversible, as is
expected when free NHC is protonated by the presence of 2-‐coumaranone. GPC traces
taken after different time intervals during sonication show two distinct peaks corresponding
to initial and broken polymer fractions. Such behavior is usually not observed for
polydisperse polymers without a weak bond (see for example ref 23) and suggests that
scission is selective for the mid-‐chain coordination bond.
In the presence of 2-‐coumaranone under air, Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 showed ≈90% chain
scission after 1h of continuous sonication, while 55% scission was observed after sonicating
for 1h under CH4 with AcOH and MeCN as trapping agents. The highest molecular weight
complex Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 was broken completely (≥ 98%) in 1h, with 25 kDa polymer
as the only polymeric product and complete disappearance of the 50kDa peak
corresponding to the complex (Figure 1d).
Mechanically induced chemiluminescence
53
3
Figure 1: GPC traces for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 taken during sonication in air saturated toluene (10
mg/ml) in the presence of 2-‐coumaranone (0.2 mM). Internal temperature was kept below 30oC.
Aliquots were taken at given time intervals. Toluene was evaporated and residues were submitted
to GPC in THF (2 mg/ml). Initial molecular weight for polymers: a) 16 kDa b) 24 kDa c) 36 kDa d) 50
kDa
Table 1: Scission rates and total scission after 1h sonication for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 polymers in the
presence of coumaranone under air.
MW (kg/mol) ksc (min-‐1) Scission (1 h)
16 0.0055 28 %
24 0.0150 60 %
36 0.0360 88 %
50 0.0600 98 %
Chain scission was determined from GPC traces using the method discussed above and is
plotted as a function of time (Figure 2). Scission rates ksc were determined by fitting first
order rate constants to the data in Figure 2a with the method presented in Chapter 2, and
are given in Table 1. A value of 13.5 kDa was determined for the limiting molecular weight
(Mlim) from linear extrapolation of a plot of ksc vs MW (Figure 2b). This value is significantly
lower than the Mlim determined previously for the same complex when sonicated under CH4
(20 kDa).
Empirically, ksc in sonication usually increases with MW following the equation 𝑘𝑘!" =
𝑘𝑘! (𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 − 𝑀𝑀!"#)ƛ 26 with kd corresponding to the slope of a plot of ksc vs MW. Figure 2b
shows that the kd for the system under air is significantly higher than for sonication under
methane (Table 2).
Table 2: kd (mol x g-‐1 x min-‐1) for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 determined for the sonications under air and CH4.
𝒌𝒌𝒅𝒅𝑷𝑷𝑷𝑷 𝒂𝒂𝒂𝒂𝒂𝒂 𝒌𝒌𝒅𝒅𝑷𝑷𝑷𝑷(𝑪𝑪𝑪𝑪𝟒𝟒)
(1.75 ± 0.1)×10!! (7.4 ± 0.3)×10!!
In Chapter 2, the kinetics of ultrasound induced chain scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 were
reported. It was shown that scission rates are strongly dependent on the heat capacity and
solubility of the saturation gas because these parameters influence the formation and
implosion of cavitation bubbles, which eventually is the source of elongational stresses in
solution.24,25 The molecular weight dependence of scission rate and limiting molecular
Chapter 3
54
Figure 1: GPC traces for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 taken during sonication in air saturated toluene (10
mg/ml) in the presence of 2-‐coumaranone (0.2 mM). Internal temperature was kept below 30oC.
Aliquots were taken at given time intervals. Toluene was evaporated and residues were submitted
to GPC in THF (2 mg/ml). Initial molecular weight for polymers: a) 16 kDa b) 24 kDa c) 36 kDa d) 50
kDa
Table 1: Scission rates and total scission after 1h sonication for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 polymers in the
presence of coumaranone under air.
MW (kg/mol) ksc (min-‐1) Scission (1 h)
16 0.0055 28 %
24 0.0150 60 %
36 0.0360 88 %
50 0.0600 98 %
Chain scission was determined from GPC traces using the method discussed above and is
plotted as a function of time (Figure 2). Scission rates ksc were determined by fitting first
order rate constants to the data in Figure 2a with the method presented in Chapter 2, and
are given in Table 1. A value of 13.5 kDa was determined for the limiting molecular weight
(Mlim) from linear extrapolation of a plot of ksc vs MW (Figure 2b). This value is significantly
lower than the Mlim determined previously for the same complex when sonicated under CH4
(20 kDa).
Empirically, ksc in sonication usually increases with MW following the equation 𝑘𝑘!" =
𝑘𝑘! (𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 − 𝑀𝑀!"#)ƛ 26 with kd corresponding to the slope of a plot of ksc vs MW. Figure 2b
shows that the kd for the system under air is significantly higher than for sonication under
methane (Table 2).
Table 2: kd (mol x g-‐1 x min-‐1) for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 determined for the sonications under air and CH4.
𝒌𝒌𝒅𝒅𝑷𝑷𝑷𝑷 𝒂𝒂𝒂𝒂𝒂𝒂 𝒌𝒌𝒅𝒅𝑷𝑷𝑷𝑷(𝑪𝑪𝑪𝑪𝟒𝟒)
(1.75 ± 0.1)×10!! (7.4 ± 0.3)×10!!
In Chapter 2, the kinetics of ultrasound induced chain scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 were
reported. It was shown that scission rates are strongly dependent on the heat capacity and
solubility of the saturation gas because these parameters influence the formation and
implosion of cavitation bubbles, which eventually is the source of elongational stresses in
solution.24,25 The molecular weight dependence of scission rate and limiting molecular
Mechanically induced chemiluminescence
55
3
weight for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 for sonication under CH4 were given in Chapter 2 are different
than those under air.
Groote has previously studied the effect of saturation gas on scission rate for Ag(NHC-‐
pTHF)2PF6 polymeric complex and reported that scission proceeds with comparable rates
under N2 and CH4.24 Therefore, it can be concluded that the presence of 20% of O2, has a
strong effect on scission rate. This may be due to the higher solubility of O2 in toluene
compared to N2 since this means cavitation bubbles involve mainly O2 rather than N2.27
Reactive sonochemical impurities produced due to pyrolysis of the content of cavitation
bubbles in hot spots28 might result in chemical breakage of polymer and increase the
scission rate.
Figure 2: a) Chain scission rates for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes under air in the presence of
coumaranone. b) Scission rate constants ksc plotted against initial molecular weights of polymers
under air (with coumaranone) and under CH4 (with CH3COOH and CH3CN). MW of polymer
complexes are 16 kDa, 24 kDa, 36 kDa and 50 kDa.
Chapter 3
56
weight for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 for sonication under CH4 were given in Chapter 2 are different
than those under air.
Groote has previously studied the effect of saturation gas on scission rate for Ag(NHC-‐
pTHF)2PF6 polymeric complex and reported that scission proceeds with comparable rates
under N2 and CH4.24 Therefore, it can be concluded that the presence of 20% of O2, has a
strong effect on scission rate. This may be due to the higher solubility of O2 in toluene
compared to N2 since this means cavitation bubbles involve mainly O2 rather than N2.27
Reactive sonochemical impurities produced due to pyrolysis of the content of cavitation
bubbles in hot spots28 might result in chemical breakage of polymer and increase the
scission rate.
Figure 2: a) Chain scission rates for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes under air in the presence of
coumaranone. b) Scission rate constants ksc plotted against initial molecular weights of polymers
under air (with coumaranone) and under CH4 (with CH3COOH and CH3CN). MW of polymer
complexes are 16 kDa, 24 kDa, 36 kDa and 50 kDa.
Mechanically induced chemiluminescence
57
3
Light emission
Mechanobase induced chemiluminescence was studied by sonication of air saturated
toluene solutions containing coumaranone 1 and Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 or small molecule
model complex Pd(NHC-‐EtBut)2Cl2, and monitoring light emission with a photodiode. During
experiments, the sonication flask was kept in the dark to prevent interference of
background light. The double-‐jacketed sonication vessel was cooled down to 2oC by water
circulation from a thermostat-‐ controlled bath to keep the temperature inside the
sonication vessel constant below 30 oC.
When a 10 mg/ml (0.2 mM) solution of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 in toluene was sonicated in
the presence of 2-‐coumaranone (0.2 mM), light intensity increased slowly as shown in
Figure 3, indicating chemiluminescent decomposition of coumaranone. Light intensity
reached a maximum level after about 300 s., after which it slowly decreased. When
sonication was stopped after 850 s., the photodiode response dropped back to its
background value in approximately 70s.
Figure 3: A 0.2 mM solution of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 in air saturated toluene was sonicated in the
presence of 2-‐coumaranone (0.2 mM). Temperature inside the sonication vessel was kept below 30 oC Luminescence was monitored with a photodiode (inset), which was placed under the sonication
flask during sonication. Light intensity was measured as the change in current.
In a control experiment (Scheme 1), a (0.2 mM) solution of low molecular weight analog
Pd(NHC-‐EtBut)2Cl2, model complex, was sonicated in the presence of coumaranone (0.2
mM) and methoxy-‐end-‐capped pTHF (30 kDa, 0.2 mM). Photodiode response did not rise
above the background level during sonication. Additonally, refluxing the mixture of Pd(NHC-‐
pTHF25k)2Cl2 (10 mg/ml) and coumaranone in toluene did not result in detectable
chemiluminescence. These observations rule out the contribution of thermal ligand-‐
dissociation to base induced chemiluminescence.
To confirm that the of presence of O2 is essential in mechano-‐chemiluminescence, a mixture
of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 and coumaranone was sonicated under CH4 otherwise identical to
above mentioned sonication conditions. No chemiluminescence was observed.
In order to test its thermal stability, Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 (10 mg/ml) and coumaranone
(0.2 mM) were kept in a toluene solution at RT for 30 days. Then a 0.1 ml aliquot was
submitted to GPC and the Mw distribution was unchanged. When the stored solution was
sonicated, the maximum light intensity was identical to that of a freshly prepared solution
Scheme 1: Mechano-‐chemiluminescence a result of decomposition of coumaranone when sonicated
in the presence of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2. Light emission was not detected when PTHF and the Pd-‐NHC
complex were both present in the solution but not covalently attached to each other.
N N
Pd
NN
ClCl R¹
O
HNOR²
OO
hvN N
Pd
NN
ClCl
O
OR¹
O
HNOR²
OO
OOn
n
n
hvx
-Pd(NHC/pTHF12k)₂Cl₂--Pd(NHC/pTHF18k)₂Cl₂--Pd(NHC/pTHF25k)₂Cl₂
PTHF:-50-kDA
+
+ +
Chapter 3
58
Light emission
Mechanobase induced chemiluminescence was studied by sonication of air saturated
toluene solutions containing coumaranone 1 and Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 or small molecule
model complex Pd(NHC-‐EtBut)2Cl2, and monitoring light emission with a photodiode. During
experiments, the sonication flask was kept in the dark to prevent interference of
background light. The double-‐jacketed sonication vessel was cooled down to 2oC by water
circulation from a thermostat-‐ controlled bath to keep the temperature inside the
sonication vessel constant below 30 oC.
When a 10 mg/ml (0.2 mM) solution of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 in toluene was sonicated in
the presence of 2-‐coumaranone (0.2 mM), light intensity increased slowly as shown in
Figure 3, indicating chemiluminescent decomposition of coumaranone. Light intensity
reached a maximum level after about 300 s., after which it slowly decreased. When
sonication was stopped after 850 s., the photodiode response dropped back to its
background value in approximately 70s.
Figure 3: A 0.2 mM solution of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 in air saturated toluene was sonicated in the
presence of 2-‐coumaranone (0.2 mM). Temperature inside the sonication vessel was kept below 30 oC Luminescence was monitored with a photodiode (inset), which was placed under the sonication
flask during sonication. Light intensity was measured as the change in current.
In a control experiment (Scheme 1), a (0.2 mM) solution of low molecular weight analog
Pd(NHC-‐EtBut)2Cl2, model complex, was sonicated in the presence of coumaranone (0.2
mM) and methoxy-‐end-‐capped pTHF (30 kDa, 0.2 mM). Photodiode response did not rise
above the background level during sonication. Additonally, refluxing the mixture of Pd(NHC-‐
pTHF25k)2Cl2 (10 mg/ml) and coumaranone in toluene did not result in detectable
chemiluminescence. These observations rule out the contribution of thermal ligand-‐
dissociation to base induced chemiluminescence.
To confirm that the of presence of O2 is essential in mechano-‐chemiluminescence, a mixture
of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 and coumaranone was sonicated under CH4 otherwise identical to
above mentioned sonication conditions. No chemiluminescence was observed.
In order to test its thermal stability, Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 (10 mg/ml) and coumaranone
(0.2 mM) were kept in a toluene solution at RT for 30 days. Then a 0.1 ml aliquot was
submitted to GPC and the Mw distribution was unchanged. When the stored solution was
sonicated, the maximum light intensity was identical to that of a freshly prepared solution
Scheme 1: Mechano-‐chemiluminescence a result of decomposition of coumaranone when sonicated
in the presence of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2. Light emission was not detected when PTHF and the Pd-‐NHC
complex were both present in the solution but not covalently attached to each other.
N N
Pd
NN
ClCl R¹
O
HNOR²
OO
hvN N
Pd
NN
ClCl
O
OR¹
O
HNOR²
OO
OOn
n
n
hvx
-Pd(NHC/pTHF12k)₂Cl₂--Pd(NHC/pTHF18k)₂Cl₂--Pd(NHC/pTHF25k)₂Cl₂
PTHF:-50-kDA
+
+ +
Mechanically induced chemiluminescence
59
3
The changes in chemiluminescence intensity with time in Figure 3 reflect the kinetics of the
individual steps of the process, which consists of scission of the carbene metal complex,
deprotonation of coumaranone, oxidation of the anion to dioxetanone, and finally
decomposition of the dioxetanone under emission of a photon, with the light intensity being
proportional to the concentration of dioxetanone. If scission would be the slowest step in
the process, light intensity would be proportional to the rate at which the complex breaks,
and simple first order decay would be observed with a rate constant corresponding to the
scission rate constant of 1 x 10-‐3 s-‐1. The initial rise in intensity in Figure 3 therefore shows
that scission is not the slowest step, and reflects the accumulation of an intermediate,
either the anion or the 2-‐dioxetanone. The latter has a reported decomposition rate
constant kD = 1.08(±0.01) x10-‐2 s-‐1 in MeCN at 25oC.21 This rate constant matches reasonably
well with the fast decrease of signal when sonication was stopped. Since deprotonation of
the coumaranone may be assumed to be fast, we conclude that decomposition of
intermediate is the slowest step. Simulation of the process with kinetic modeling software,
using the parameters in Scheme 2 indeed reproduces qualitatively the observed rise and
decay in light intensity (Figure 4).
Scheme 2: Schematic representation of mechanochemiluminescence, estimated rate constants and
proposed chemiluminescent decomposition mechanism in the presence of base and oxygen.
Ultrasound induced chain scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 yields free carbene which abstracts a proton
from 2-‐coumaranone and then it decomposes through a luminescent pathway.
F
O
HN
OBu
O
O O2
1-2 dioxetanone2-coumaranone
hv
F
O
HN
OBu
O
OF
O
OO
O
HN
BuO O
CO2
F
OH
NH
OBu
O O
+
1 32
3
N N
Pd
NN
ClCl
O
O
n
n
N NOn
Pd
NN
ClCl
On
Ultrasound ksc$:$0.001$s)¹
k₁$:$0.030$s)¹
k₃$>>$k)₃
k₁$:$0.011$s)¹
k₄$>>$k)₄
[PMP]₀6:60.26mM
[Coum]₀6:60.26mM
Chapter 3
60
The changes in chemiluminescence intensity with time in Figure 3 reflect the kinetics of the
individual steps of the process, which consists of scission of the carbene metal complex,
deprotonation of coumaranone, oxidation of the anion to dioxetanone, and finally
decomposition of the dioxetanone under emission of a photon, with the light intensity being
proportional to the concentration of dioxetanone. If scission would be the slowest step in
the process, light intensity would be proportional to the rate at which the complex breaks,
and simple first order decay would be observed with a rate constant corresponding to the
scission rate constant of 1 x 10-‐3 s-‐1. The initial rise in intensity in Figure 3 therefore shows
that scission is not the slowest step, and reflects the accumulation of an intermediate,
either the anion or the 2-‐dioxetanone. The latter has a reported decomposition rate
constant kD = 1.08(±0.01) x10-‐2 s-‐1 in MeCN at 25oC.21 This rate constant matches reasonably
well with the fast decrease of signal when sonication was stopped. Since deprotonation of
the coumaranone may be assumed to be fast, we conclude that decomposition of
intermediate is the slowest step. Simulation of the process with kinetic modeling software,
using the parameters in Scheme 2 indeed reproduces qualitatively the observed rise and
decay in light intensity (Figure 4).
Scheme 2: Schematic representation of mechanochemiluminescence, estimated rate constants and
proposed chemiluminescent decomposition mechanism in the presence of base and oxygen.
Ultrasound induced chain scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 yields free carbene which abstracts a proton
from 2-‐coumaranone and then it decomposes through a luminescent pathway.
F
O
HN
OBu
O
O O2
1-2 dioxetanone2-coumaranone
hv
F
O
HN
OBu
O
OF
O
OO
O
HN
BuO O
CO2
F
OH
NH
OBu
O O
+
1 32
3
N N
Pd
NN
ClCl
O
O
n
n
N NOn
Pd
NN
ClCl
On
Ultrasound ksc$:$0.001$s)¹
k₁$:$0.030$s)¹
k₃$>>$k)₃
k₁$:$0.011$s)¹
k₄$>>$k)₄
[PMP]₀6:60.26mM
[Coum]₀6:60.26mM
Mechanically induced chemiluminescence
61
3
Example of simulated light intensity (proportional to [Cox]) with following kinetic parameters:
PMP = PM + P k1 = 0.001 s-‐1 (ksc for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 taken from Table 1), k-‐1 = 108 M-‐1s-‐1
(backward reaction was assumed to be diffusion controlled)
P + C = PH + Canion k2 = 108 s-‐1 (assumed to be diffusion controlled), k-‐2 = 10-‐4 M-‐1s-‐1
(assumption: k2>>k-‐2)
Canion + O2 = Cox k3 = 0.03 s-‐1 (assumption: k3>>k-‐3)
Cox = Cdecomp k4 = 0.011 s-‐1 (k4 is taken from ref 21, assumption: k4>>k-‐4,)
Backward rates are included because gepasi cannot handle zero reverse rates. Initial
concentrations were taken as [PMP] = 0.2 mM [C] = 0.2 mM [O2] = 1 M (value was set high
to keep [O2] constant).
Figure 4: Simulated change in light intensity (proportional to [Cox]) is compared with experimental
data. GEPASI21 was used for simulation with kinetic parameters in Scheme 1.
Figure 5: Comparison of the light intensity during sonication of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 polymers in the
presence of 2-‐coumaranone. MW for polymers are 50 kDa, 36 kDa and 24 kDa.
Conclusions
Chain scission in the presence of coumaranone has been investigated. Base induced
chemiluminescent property of coumaranone provided a molecular probe to monitor chain
scission in situ. Kinetic studies revealed that the NHC-‐Pd bond is mechanically more labile
under air than under CH4. The lowest molecular weight for polymeric complex Pd(NHC-‐
pTHF)2Cl2 to break under ultrasound induced strain was calculated as 13.5 kDa. Above that
MW the rate of mechanochemical chain scission increases linearly with initial Mw.
Sonicating Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes reveals free NHC-‐pTHF ligands which abstracts
proton from coumaranone that is followed by a dioxetanone and its subsequent
chemiluminescent decomposition. Mechanically induced release of a base to activate
chemiluminescence could be monitored by a photodiode. Control experiments showed that
the chemiluminescence is a result of mechanical activation NHC-‐Pd bond to yield free NHC.
It has been shown here that Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes are thermally stable sources of
base that can be released under mechanical stress in due course.
These preliminary results represent the first promising example of mechano-‐
chemiluminescence and in the presence of 2-‐coumaranone, mechanochemical chain
Chapter 3
62
Example of simulated light intensity (proportional to [Cox]) with following kinetic parameters:
PMP = PM + P k1 = 0.001 s-‐1 (ksc for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 taken from Table 1), k-‐1 = 108 M-‐1s-‐1
(backward reaction was assumed to be diffusion controlled)
P + C = PH + Canion k2 = 108 s-‐1 (assumed to be diffusion controlled), k-‐2 = 10-‐4 M-‐1s-‐1
(assumption: k2>>k-‐2)
Canion + O2 = Cox k3 = 0.03 s-‐1 (assumption: k3>>k-‐3)
Cox = Cdecomp k4 = 0.011 s-‐1 (k4 is taken from ref 21, assumption: k4>>k-‐4,)
Backward rates are included because gepasi cannot handle zero reverse rates. Initial
concentrations were taken as [PMP] = 0.2 mM [C] = 0.2 mM [O2] = 1 M (value was set high
to keep [O2] constant).
Figure 4: Simulated change in light intensity (proportional to [Cox]) is compared with experimental
data. GEPASI21 was used for simulation with kinetic parameters in Scheme 1.
Figure 5: Comparison of the light intensity during sonication of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 polymers in the
presence of 2-‐coumaranone. MW for polymers are 50 kDa, 36 kDa and 24 kDa.
Conclusions
Chain scission in the presence of coumaranone has been investigated. Base induced
chemiluminescent property of coumaranone provided a molecular probe to monitor chain
scission in situ. Kinetic studies revealed that the NHC-‐Pd bond is mechanically more labile
under air than under CH4. The lowest molecular weight for polymeric complex Pd(NHC-‐
pTHF)2Cl2 to break under ultrasound induced strain was calculated as 13.5 kDa. Above that
MW the rate of mechanochemical chain scission increases linearly with initial Mw.
Sonicating Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes reveals free NHC-‐pTHF ligands which abstracts
proton from coumaranone that is followed by a dioxetanone and its subsequent
chemiluminescent decomposition. Mechanically induced release of a base to activate
chemiluminescence could be monitored by a photodiode. Control experiments showed that
the chemiluminescence is a result of mechanical activation NHC-‐Pd bond to yield free NHC.
It has been shown here that Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes are thermally stable sources of
base that can be released under mechanical stress in due course.
These preliminary results represent the first promising example of mechano-‐
chemiluminescence and in the presence of 2-‐coumaranone, mechanochemical chain
Mechanically induced chemiluminescence
63
3
scission can be visually monitored, which could be used for mapping deformations in
polymer samples.
Experimental
General
All chemicals were purchased from commercial sources used without further purification, unless
specified otherwise. Dry tetrahydrofuran (THF, HPLC grade) was degassed with argon and purified by
passage through activated alumina solvent column. Toluene was dried over 4Å molecular sieves for
at least 12h prior to use. Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) was performed on a Shimadzu
LC10-‐AD, using Polymer Laboratories PL Gel 5μm MIXED-‐C and MIXEDD columns (linear range of
MW: 200–2000000 g/mol), a Shimadzu SPD-‐M10A UV-‐vis detector at 254 nm and RID-‐10A refractive
index detector, and THF as eluent at a flow rate of 1 mL/min (20 °C). Polystyrene standards were
used for calibration.
Sonication experiments
A homemade, double-‐jacketed glass vessel with a volume of 10 mL was used in the sonication
experiments. A Sonics and Materials 20 kHz, 0.5 in. diameter titanium alloy ultrasound probe with
half wave extension (parts 630-‐0220 and 630-‐0410) was operated using a Sonics and Materials
VC750 power supply. A silicon photodiode (Hanamatsu, diameter of photosensitive area 7 mm)
positioned underneath the vessel during sonication for mechano-‐chemiluminescence experiments.
The set-‐up was covered to exclude background light. The temperature in the vessel was maintained
with a Lauda E300 cooling bath and measured using a 0.5 mm diameter thermocouple. Solutions
were sonicated continuously. Temperature of the solution was checked by thermocouple and
recorded as below 30oC after the thermal equilibrium was achieved in the first 5 mins. During
sonication air was bubbled through the solution via teflon tubing. Aliquots of 100 µL were taken at
different time intervals toluene was removed under reduced pressure and residues were dissolved
in THF and submitted to GPC. In order to calculate mechanochemical scission rates GPC traces for
samples taken during sonication were fitted using Origin 8.5 to following equation:
𝑰𝑰 𝒙𝒙 =𝑨𝑨𝟏𝟏
𝒘𝒘 𝝅𝝅 𝟐𝟐𝒆𝒆!𝟐𝟐
𝒙𝒙!𝒙𝒙𝒄𝒄,𝟏𝟏𝒘𝒘
𝟐𝟐
+𝑨𝑨𝟐𝟐
𝒘𝒘 𝝅𝝅 𝟐𝟐𝒆𝒆!𝟐𝟐
𝒙𝒙!𝒙𝒙𝒄𝒄,𝟐𝟐𝒘𝒘
𝟐𝟐
Where;
A1 = Area of peak 1, high molecular weight peak
A2 = Area of peak 2, low molecular weight peak
w = 2σ = Width of both peaks
X = Retention time
Xc,1 = Retention time at the center of peak 1
Xc,2 = Retention time at the center of peak 2
All peaks were normalized to total peak area (A1+A2=1). All GPC traces during sonication were fitted
with the indicated formula, fixing values for Xc,1, Xc,2, and w to the same values for each samples.
Chapter 3
64
scission can be visually monitored, which could be used for mapping deformations in
polymer samples.
Experimental
General
All chemicals were purchased from commercial sources used without further purification, unless
specified otherwise. Dry tetrahydrofuran (THF, HPLC grade) was degassed with argon and purified by
passage through activated alumina solvent column. Toluene was dried over 4Å molecular sieves for
at least 12h prior to use. Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) was performed on a Shimadzu
LC10-‐AD, using Polymer Laboratories PL Gel 5μm MIXED-‐C and MIXEDD columns (linear range of
MW: 200–2000000 g/mol), a Shimadzu SPD-‐M10A UV-‐vis detector at 254 nm and RID-‐10A refractive
index detector, and THF as eluent at a flow rate of 1 mL/min (20 °C). Polystyrene standards were
used for calibration.
Sonication experiments
A homemade, double-‐jacketed glass vessel with a volume of 10 mL was used in the sonication
experiments. A Sonics and Materials 20 kHz, 0.5 in. diameter titanium alloy ultrasound probe with
half wave extension (parts 630-‐0220 and 630-‐0410) was operated using a Sonics and Materials
VC750 power supply. A silicon photodiode (Hanamatsu, diameter of photosensitive area 7 mm)
positioned underneath the vessel during sonication for mechano-‐chemiluminescence experiments.
The set-‐up was covered to exclude background light. The temperature in the vessel was maintained
with a Lauda E300 cooling bath and measured using a 0.5 mm diameter thermocouple. Solutions
were sonicated continuously. Temperature of the solution was checked by thermocouple and
recorded as below 30oC after the thermal equilibrium was achieved in the first 5 mins. During
sonication air was bubbled through the solution via teflon tubing. Aliquots of 100 µL were taken at
different time intervals toluene was removed under reduced pressure and residues were dissolved
in THF and submitted to GPC. In order to calculate mechanochemical scission rates GPC traces for
samples taken during sonication were fitted using Origin 8.5 to following equation:
𝑰𝑰 𝒙𝒙 =𝑨𝑨𝟏𝟏
𝒘𝒘 𝝅𝝅 𝟐𝟐𝒆𝒆!𝟐𝟐
𝒙𝒙!𝒙𝒙𝒄𝒄,𝟏𝟏𝒘𝒘
𝟐𝟐
+𝑨𝑨𝟐𝟐
𝒘𝒘 𝝅𝝅 𝟐𝟐𝒆𝒆!𝟐𝟐
𝒙𝒙!𝒙𝒙𝒄𝒄,𝟐𝟐𝒘𝒘
𝟐𝟐
Where;
A1 = Area of peak 1, high molecular weight peak
A2 = Area of peak 2, low molecular weight peak
w = 2σ = Width of both peaks
X = Retention time
Xc,1 = Retention time at the center of peak 1
Xc,2 = Retention time at the center of peak 2
All peaks were normalized to total peak area (A1+A2=1). All GPC traces during sonication were fitted
with the indicated formula, fixing values for Xc,1, Xc,2, and w to the same values for each samples.
Mechanically induced chemiluminescence
65
3
References
(1) Fèvre, M.; Pinaud, J.; Gnanou, Y.; Vignolle, J.; Taton, D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42 (5), 2142–
2172.
(2) Marion, N.; Díez-‐González, S.; Nolan, S. P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46 (17), 2988–3000.
(3) Hopkinson, M. N.; Richter, C.; Schedler, M.; Glorius, F. Nature 2014, 510 (7506), 485–496.
(4) Moore, J. L.; Rovis, T. Top. Curr. Chem. 2010, 291.
(5) Bantu, B.; Pawar, G. M.; Decker, U.; Wurst, K.; Schmidt, A. M.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Chem. – Eur.
J. 2009, 15 (13), 3103–3109.
(6) Naumann, S.; Schmidt, F. G.; Schowner, R.; Frey, W.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4
(9), 2731–2740.
(7) Naumann, S.; Schmidt, F. G.; Frey, W.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4 (15), 4172–
4181.
(8) Naumann, S.; Schmidt, F. G.; Speiser, M.; Böhl, M.; Epple, S.; Bonten, C.; Buchmeiser, M. R.
Macromolecules 2013, 46 (21), 8426–8433.
(9) Naumann, S.; Speiser, M.; Schowner, R.; Giebel, E.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Macromolecules 2014,
47 (14), 4548–4556.
(10) Piermattei, A.; Karthikeyan, S.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1 (2), 133–137.
(11) Karthikeyan, S.; Potisek, S. L.; Piermattei, A.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130 (45),
14968–14969.
(12) Karthikeyan, S.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat Chem 2010, 2 (6), 436–437.
(13) Beyer, M. K. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112 (17), 7307–7312.
(14) Davis, D. A.; Hamilton, A.; Yang, J.; Cremar, L. D.; Van Gough, D.; Potisek, S. L.; Ong, M. T.;
Braun, P. V.; Martínez, T. J.; White, S. R.; Moore, J. S.; Sottos, N. R. Nature 2009, 459 (7243),
68–72.
(15) Black Ramirez, A. L.; Kean, Z. S.; Orlicki, J. A.; Champhekar, M.; Elsakr, S. M.; Krause, W. E.;
Craig, S. L. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5 (9), 757–761.
(16) Chen, Y.; Spiering, A. J. H.; Karthikeyan, S.; Peters, G. W. M.; Meijer, E. W.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat.
Chem. 2012, 4 (7), 559–562.
(17) Turro, N. J.; Lechtken, P.; Schore, N. E.; Schuster, G.; Steinmetzer, H. C.; Yekta, A. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1974, 7 (4), 97–105.
(18) Schuster, G. B.; Turro, N. J.; Steinmetzer, H. C.; Schaap, A. P.; Faler, G.; Adam, W.; Liu, J. C. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97 (24), 7110–7118.
(19) Lofthouse, G. J.; Suschitzky, H.; Wakefield, B. J.; Whittaker, R. A.; Tuck, B. J. Chem. Soc. [Perkin
1] 1979, No. 0, 1634–1639.
(20) Schramm, S.; Weiss, D.; Navizet, I.; Roca-‐Sanjuán, D.; Brandl, W.; Beckert, R.; Görls, H.
ARKIVOC 2013, iii, 174–188.
(21) Ciscato, L. F. M. L.; Bartoloni, F. H.; Colavite, A. S.; Weiss, D.; Beckert, R.; Schramm, S.
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2013, 13 (1), 32–37.
(22) Almeida de Oliveira, M.; Bartoloni, F. H.; Augusto, F. A.; Ciscato, L. F. M. L.; Bastos, E. L.;
Baader, W. J. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77 (23), 10537–10544.
(23) Odell, J. A.; Keller, A. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 1986, 24 (9), 1889–1916.
(24) Rooze, J.; Groote, R.; Jakobs, R. T. M.; Sijbesma, R. P.; van Iersel, M. M.; Rebrov, E. V.;
Schouten, J. C.; Keurentjes, J. T. F. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115 (38), 11038–11043.
(25) Groote, R.; Jakobs, R. T. M.; Sijbesma, R. P. ACS Macro Lett. 2012, 1 (8), 1012–1015.
(26) Vijayalakshmi, S. P.; Madras, G. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005, 90 (1), 116–122.
(27) Field, L. R.; Wilhelm, E.; Battino, R. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 1974, 6 (3), 237–243.
(28) Szwarc, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1948, 16 (2), 128–136.
Chapter 3
66
References
(1) Fèvre, M.; Pinaud, J.; Gnanou, Y.; Vignolle, J.; Taton, D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42 (5), 2142–
2172.
(2) Marion, N.; Díez-‐González, S.; Nolan, S. P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46 (17), 2988–3000.
(3) Hopkinson, M. N.; Richter, C.; Schedler, M.; Glorius, F. Nature 2014, 510 (7506), 485–496.
(4) Moore, J. L.; Rovis, T. Top. Curr. Chem. 2010, 291.
(5) Bantu, B.; Pawar, G. M.; Decker, U.; Wurst, K.; Schmidt, A. M.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Chem. – Eur.
J. 2009, 15 (13), 3103–3109.
(6) Naumann, S.; Schmidt, F. G.; Schowner, R.; Frey, W.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4
(9), 2731–2740.
(7) Naumann, S.; Schmidt, F. G.; Frey, W.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4 (15), 4172–
4181.
(8) Naumann, S.; Schmidt, F. G.; Speiser, M.; Böhl, M.; Epple, S.; Bonten, C.; Buchmeiser, M. R.
Macromolecules 2013, 46 (21), 8426–8433.
(9) Naumann, S.; Speiser, M.; Schowner, R.; Giebel, E.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Macromolecules 2014,
47 (14), 4548–4556.
(10) Piermattei, A.; Karthikeyan, S.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1 (2), 133–137.
(11) Karthikeyan, S.; Potisek, S. L.; Piermattei, A.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130 (45),
14968–14969.
(12) Karthikeyan, S.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat Chem 2010, 2 (6), 436–437.
(13) Beyer, M. K. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112 (17), 7307–7312.
(14) Davis, D. A.; Hamilton, A.; Yang, J.; Cremar, L. D.; Van Gough, D.; Potisek, S. L.; Ong, M. T.;
Braun, P. V.; Martínez, T. J.; White, S. R.; Moore, J. S.; Sottos, N. R. Nature 2009, 459 (7243),
68–72.
(15) Black Ramirez, A. L.; Kean, Z. S.; Orlicki, J. A.; Champhekar, M.; Elsakr, S. M.; Krause, W. E.;
Craig, S. L. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5 (9), 757–761.
(16) Chen, Y.; Spiering, A. J. H.; Karthikeyan, S.; Peters, G. W. M.; Meijer, E. W.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat.
Chem. 2012, 4 (7), 559–562.
(17) Turro, N. J.; Lechtken, P.; Schore, N. E.; Schuster, G.; Steinmetzer, H. C.; Yekta, A. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1974, 7 (4), 97–105.
(18) Schuster, G. B.; Turro, N. J.; Steinmetzer, H. C.; Schaap, A. P.; Faler, G.; Adam, W.; Liu, J. C. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97 (24), 7110–7118.
(19) Lofthouse, G. J.; Suschitzky, H.; Wakefield, B. J.; Whittaker, R. A.; Tuck, B. J. Chem. Soc. [Perkin
1] 1979, No. 0, 1634–1639.
(20) Schramm, S.; Weiss, D.; Navizet, I.; Roca-‐Sanjuán, D.; Brandl, W.; Beckert, R.; Görls, H.
ARKIVOC 2013, iii, 174–188.
(21) Ciscato, L. F. M. L.; Bartoloni, F. H.; Colavite, A. S.; Weiss, D.; Beckert, R.; Schramm, S.
Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2013, 13 (1), 32–37.
(22) Almeida de Oliveira, M.; Bartoloni, F. H.; Augusto, F. A.; Ciscato, L. F. M. L.; Bastos, E. L.;
Baader, W. J. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77 (23), 10537–10544.
(23) Odell, J. A.; Keller, A. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 1986, 24 (9), 1889–1916.
(24) Rooze, J.; Groote, R.; Jakobs, R. T. M.; Sijbesma, R. P.; van Iersel, M. M.; Rebrov, E. V.;
Schouten, J. C.; Keurentjes, J. T. F. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115 (38), 11038–11043.
(25) Groote, R.; Jakobs, R. T. M.; Sijbesma, R. P. ACS Macro Lett. 2012, 1 (8), 1012–1015.
(26) Vijayalakshmi, S. P.; Madras, G. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005, 90 (1), 116–122.
(27) Field, L. R.; Wilhelm, E.; Battino, R. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 1974, 6 (3), 237–243.
(28) Szwarc, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1948, 16 (2), 128–136.
Mechanically induced chemiluminescence
67
3
Chapter 4Determination of ligand exchange dynamics and sonication induced ligand exchange rate in Imidazole-Pd centered coordination polymers
Thermal ligand exchange between imidazole Palladium (II) complexes has been investigated
in the presence of excess free imidazole ligand in CHCl3. Ligand exchange between bound
and free ligands in a mixture of Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 and EtIm was shown to occur through an asso-
ciative process via intermediate [Pd(EtIm)3Cl]Cl. NMR and MALDI-TOF established the struc-
ture of the intermediate. In contrast to the thermal process, ligand exchange was dissocia-
tive when mixtures of polymer functionalized complex Pd(Im-pTHF)2Cl2 and low molecular
weight complex Pd(DodecIm)2Cl2 were sonicated in solution. 40% of exchange was observed
after 1h of continuous sonication at 20 °C.
Introduction
Coordination polymers (CPs), with their dynamic reversible nature, find applications as
smart materials, for instance, as stimuli-‐responsive, self-‐healing and photoactive
polymers.1,2 Recent attention in this research area is focused on the characterization of the
dynamic properties of CPs by exploring their exchange kinetics,3 ring–chain equilibria,4
solvent interactions,5 and new metal– ligand combinations.6
We have shown that the coordination sphere of transition-‐metal complexes in the main
chain of CPs can be manipulated by means of mechanical force.7 As demonstrated by us and
other research groups, transition metal CPs can be used as mechanoresponsive polymers
and provide opportunity for mechanical release of reactive groups that can be used in
further reactions, e.g. as catalytically active sites.8
Ultrasound is one of the most efficient techniques to create forces that break bonds of
polymer backbones in solution.9 In order to effectively transduce elongational strain fields in
solution, high molecular weight polymers are required.10 Incorporation of weak bonds into a
polymer chain increases the sensitivity of the chain to mechanical force and thus decreases
the molecular weight threshold for mechanochemical chain scission. Groote et al.
investigated the scission of metal-‐ligand bonds in supramolecular polymer complexes by
ultrasound and showed that the force required to break metal−ligand bond is much lower
than the force that is typically required to break covalent bonds.11 Thus, ultrasonication of
reversible coordination polymers enables the specific rupture of metal ligand coordination
bonds since force selectively breaks the weakest bond on the chain.
One of the first reports on mechanochemistry of CP’s involved high-‐molecular-‐weight linear
polymers of alkyldicyclohexylphosphine (ADChP) telechelic polytetrahydrofuran with
palladium(II) dichloride.7,12 Molecular weights of these polymers were altered reversibly by
ultrasonic chain scission. In order to scavenge the reactive chain ends created by ultrasonic
scission, coordinatively unsaturated Pd(II) and phosphine, bisalkyldiphenylphosphine
(ADPhP) complex of palladium(II) dichloride was added. This low molecular weight complex
shows high reactivity towards ADChP ligands and coordinatively unsaturated Pd, but not
towards the coordination polymer. High nucleophilicity of ADChP resulted in complete
displacement of ADPhP ligand.4 These results aroused our curiosity towards understanding
the mechanisms and kinetics of ligand exchange triggered by ultrasound.
Insight in the dynamics of ligand exchange in coordination polymers is required for rational
use in diverse applications such as responsive materials, where the ligand exchange kinetics
determine mechanical properties, and mechano-‐catalysis, where relative rates of scission
and association determine the steady state concentration of active species.
Generally, ligand exchange occurs by one of two mechanisms: dissociative or associative.13–
16 In a dissociative mechanism one of the ligands coordinated to the metal center
dissociates, leaving an electron deficient complex. Then, a free ligand coordinates to metal,
resulting in ligand exchange. In transition metal complexes, dissociative ligand exchange is
favored in 18e-‐ systems to avoid the formation of an energetically unfavorable 20e-‐
intermediate. On the other hand, ligand exchange occurs through an associative mechanism
for 16e-‐ square planar complexes. The intermediate in this case is an 18e-‐ complex and
therefore provides a lower energy route to the product than the 14e-‐ intermediate, formed
via dissociative ligand exchange.
In the current Chapter, the thermal ligand exchange mechanism (Scheme 1) and rate of
ultrasound-‐induced scission of Pd-‐Imidazole CP’s are investigated. Pd-‐Imidazole
coordination complexes were selected to learn how ligand exchange could be initiated by
mechanical force. This knowledge can be used in further studies such as solid-‐state catalysis
and self-‐healing materials. Initial attempts and some preliminary results for the latter are
introduced in Chapter 6.
Chapter 4
70
Introduction
Coordination polymers (CPs), with their dynamic reversible nature, find applications as
smart materials, for instance, as stimuli-‐responsive, self-‐healing and photoactive
polymers.1,2 Recent attention in this research area is focused on the characterization of the
dynamic properties of CPs by exploring their exchange kinetics,3 ring–chain equilibria,4
solvent interactions,5 and new metal– ligand combinations.6
We have shown that the coordination sphere of transition-‐metal complexes in the main
chain of CPs can be manipulated by means of mechanical force.7 As demonstrated by us and
other research groups, transition metal CPs can be used as mechanoresponsive polymers
and provide opportunity for mechanical release of reactive groups that can be used in
further reactions, e.g. as catalytically active sites.8
Ultrasound is one of the most efficient techniques to create forces that break bonds of
polymer backbones in solution.9 In order to effectively transduce elongational strain fields in
solution, high molecular weight polymers are required.10 Incorporation of weak bonds into a
polymer chain increases the sensitivity of the chain to mechanical force and thus decreases
the molecular weight threshold for mechanochemical chain scission. Groote et al.
investigated the scission of metal-‐ligand bonds in supramolecular polymer complexes by
ultrasound and showed that the force required to break metal−ligand bond is much lower
than the force that is typically required to break covalent bonds.11 Thus, ultrasonication of
reversible coordination polymers enables the specific rupture of metal ligand coordination
bonds since force selectively breaks the weakest bond on the chain.
One of the first reports on mechanochemistry of CP’s involved high-‐molecular-‐weight linear
polymers of alkyldicyclohexylphosphine (ADChP) telechelic polytetrahydrofuran with
palladium(II) dichloride.7,12 Molecular weights of these polymers were altered reversibly by
ultrasonic chain scission. In order to scavenge the reactive chain ends created by ultrasonic
scission, coordinatively unsaturated Pd(II) and phosphine, bisalkyldiphenylphosphine
(ADPhP) complex of palladium(II) dichloride was added. This low molecular weight complex
shows high reactivity towards ADChP ligands and coordinatively unsaturated Pd, but not
towards the coordination polymer. High nucleophilicity of ADChP resulted in complete
displacement of ADPhP ligand.4 These results aroused our curiosity towards understanding
the mechanisms and kinetics of ligand exchange triggered by ultrasound.
Insight in the dynamics of ligand exchange in coordination polymers is required for rational
use in diverse applications such as responsive materials, where the ligand exchange kinetics
determine mechanical properties, and mechano-‐catalysis, where relative rates of scission
and association determine the steady state concentration of active species.
Generally, ligand exchange occurs by one of two mechanisms: dissociative or associative.13–
16 In a dissociative mechanism one of the ligands coordinated to the metal center
dissociates, leaving an electron deficient complex. Then, a free ligand coordinates to metal,
resulting in ligand exchange. In transition metal complexes, dissociative ligand exchange is
favored in 18e-‐ systems to avoid the formation of an energetically unfavorable 20e-‐
intermediate. On the other hand, ligand exchange occurs through an associative mechanism
for 16e-‐ square planar complexes. The intermediate in this case is an 18e-‐ complex and
therefore provides a lower energy route to the product than the 14e-‐ intermediate, formed
via dissociative ligand exchange.
In the current Chapter, the thermal ligand exchange mechanism (Scheme 1) and rate of
ultrasound-‐induced scission of Pd-‐Imidazole CP’s are investigated. Pd-‐Imidazole
coordination complexes were selected to learn how ligand exchange could be initiated by
mechanical force. This knowledge can be used in further studies such as solid-‐state catalysis
and self-‐healing materials. Initial attempts and some preliminary results for the latter are
introduced in Chapter 6.
Determination of ligand exchange dynamics
71
4
Scheme 1: Potential ligand exchange pathways between complex Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 and free ligand EtIm
NN Pd NCl
N
Cl+ N N
NN Pd NCl
N
Cl
+
N
N
NN Pd NCl
N
Cl
N
N
NN Pd NN
ClN
N+ Cl
'
NN Pd N
N
ClN
N
Cl
NN Pd NCl
N
Cl
+N
N
Dissociative
Associative
Results and Discussions
Synthesis of Pd-‐Imidazole complexes
Scheme 2: Synthesis of polymer attached complex and model complexes.
Im-‐pTHF ligands were prepared by terminating poly tetrahydrofuran (pTHF) with imidazole
(Im) (Scheme 2). Cationic ring opening polymerization of THF was performed as described in
Chapter 2. Polymerization was terminated by nucleophilic substitution of the sodium
imidazolate, obtained by deprotonation of 1H-‐imidazole with NaH in THF. Once Im-‐pTHF is
formed, the nucleophilic N(3) nitrogen can react further with cationic chain ends to form 1,3
pTHF-‐imidazolium salt. Therefore, sodium imidazolate end-‐capper was used five-‐fold in
excess relative to methyl triflate initiator. Molecular weights of resulting polymers were
analyzed by 1H NMR, MALDI-‐TOF and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). MW value
obtained in MALDI-‐TOF was used for the further calculations. Depending on the
polymerization time Im-‐pTHFs with MW of 18 kDa and 35 kDa were prepared.
Chapter 4
72
Scheme 1: Potential ligand exchange pathways between complex Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 and free ligand EtIm
NN Pd NCl
N
Cl+ N N
NN Pd NCl
N
Cl
+
N
N
NN Pd NCl
N
Cl
N
N
NN Pd NN
ClN
N+ Cl
'
NN Pd N
N
ClN
N
Cl
NN Pd NCl
N
Cl
+N
N
Dissociative
Associative
Results and Discussions
Synthesis of Pd-‐Imidazole complexes
Scheme 2: Synthesis of polymer attached complex and model complexes.
Im-‐pTHF ligands were prepared by terminating poly tetrahydrofuran (pTHF) with imidazole
(Im) (Scheme 2). Cationic ring opening polymerization of THF was performed as described in
Chapter 2. Polymerization was terminated by nucleophilic substitution of the sodium
imidazolate, obtained by deprotonation of 1H-‐imidazole with NaH in THF. Once Im-‐pTHF is
formed, the nucleophilic N(3) nitrogen can react further with cationic chain ends to form 1,3
pTHF-‐imidazolium salt. Therefore, sodium imidazolate end-‐capper was used five-‐fold in
excess relative to methyl triflate initiator. Molecular weights of resulting polymers were
analyzed by 1H NMR, MALDI-‐TOF and gel permeation chromatography (GPC). MW value
obtained in MALDI-‐TOF was used for the further calculations. Depending on the
polymerization time Im-‐pTHFs with MW of 18 kDa and 35 kDa were prepared.
Determination of ligand exchange dynamics
73
4
Polymer functionalized imidazolyl ligands Im-‐pTHF, EtIm and DodecIm were coordinated to
Pd via exchange of the acetonitrile (MeCN) ligand in Pd(MeCN)2Cl2 to give
mechanoresponsive complex Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and low molecular weight complexes
Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 and Pd(DodecIm)2Cl2. MeCN-‐Pd coordination is sufficiently labile to allow ligand
exchange at room temperature in dichloromethane (DCM). Coordination of imidazole
ligands was evident from the change in chemical shifts for H(2), H(4) and H(5) protons on
the imidazole heterocycle. In the Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complex, chemical shifts for the imidazolyl
moiety were identical to those in the small molecule counterparts Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 and
Pd(DodecIm)2Cl2. 1H NMR spectra were in good agreement with literature data published
previously.17
Im-‐pTHF coordination reactions were completed after 2h as molecular weight distributions
monitored by GPC did not change after 2h. GPC also showed that reaction of polymer
functionalized ligand Im-‐pTHF (Mn = 18 kDa) resulted in doubling of the molecular weight to
36 kDa (Figure 1). This indicates that two imidazoles are coordinated to Pd although it has
been reported that coordination of three imidazole ligands to Pd (II) may also take place at
higher ligand to metal ratio and specific reaction conditions.17
Figure 1: 1H NMR spectra (left, in CD2Cl2) and GPC traces (right, in THF) for Im-‐pTHF18k and Pd(Im-‐
pTHF18k)2Cl2.
Ligand exchange between EtIm and Pd(EtIm)2Cl2
Structure of the intermediate
In order to determine the ligand exchange mechanism for palladium-‐imidazole complexes,
free ligand EtIm (L) and Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 (C) were mixed in a 1:1 molar ratio (0.09 M each) in
CDCl3. The 1H-‐NMR spectrum (Figure 2) revealed the coexistence of three magnetically non-‐
equivalent species, L, coordination complexes C and intermediate, [Pd(EtIm)3Cl]Cl (I).
MALDI-‐TOF spectrum indicated that tris-‐imidazole coordinated complex [Pd(EtIm)3Cl]Cl
formed when free ligand and Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 were mixed (Figure 3).
Figure 2: Stacked 1H NMR spectra for EtIm (b), Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 (c) and [Pd(EtIm)3Cl]Cl (a) in CDCl3 (400
MHz).
Chapter 4
74
Polymer functionalized imidazolyl ligands Im-‐pTHF, EtIm and DodecIm were coordinated to
Pd via exchange of the acetonitrile (MeCN) ligand in Pd(MeCN)2Cl2 to give
mechanoresponsive complex Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and low molecular weight complexes
Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 and Pd(DodecIm)2Cl2. MeCN-‐Pd coordination is sufficiently labile to allow ligand
exchange at room temperature in dichloromethane (DCM). Coordination of imidazole
ligands was evident from the change in chemical shifts for H(2), H(4) and H(5) protons on
the imidazole heterocycle. In the Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complex, chemical shifts for the imidazolyl
moiety were identical to those in the small molecule counterparts Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 and
Pd(DodecIm)2Cl2. 1H NMR spectra were in good agreement with literature data published
previously.17
Im-‐pTHF coordination reactions were completed after 2h as molecular weight distributions
monitored by GPC did not change after 2h. GPC also showed that reaction of polymer
functionalized ligand Im-‐pTHF (Mn = 18 kDa) resulted in doubling of the molecular weight to
36 kDa (Figure 1). This indicates that two imidazoles are coordinated to Pd although it has
been reported that coordination of three imidazole ligands to Pd (II) may also take place at
higher ligand to metal ratio and specific reaction conditions.17
Figure 1: 1H NMR spectra (left, in CD2Cl2) and GPC traces (right, in THF) for Im-‐pTHF18k and Pd(Im-‐
pTHF18k)2Cl2.
Ligand exchange between EtIm and Pd(EtIm)2Cl2
Structure of the intermediate
In order to determine the ligand exchange mechanism for palladium-‐imidazole complexes,
free ligand EtIm (L) and Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 (C) were mixed in a 1:1 molar ratio (0.09 M each) in
CDCl3. The 1H-‐NMR spectrum (Figure 2) revealed the coexistence of three magnetically non-‐
equivalent species, L, coordination complexes C and intermediate, [Pd(EtIm)3Cl]Cl (I).
MALDI-‐TOF spectrum indicated that tris-‐imidazole coordinated complex [Pd(EtIm)3Cl]Cl
formed when free ligand and Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 were mixed (Figure 3).
Figure 2: Stacked 1H NMR spectra for EtIm (b), Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 (c) and [Pd(EtIm)3Cl]Cl (a) in CDCl3 (400
MHz).
Determination of ligand exchange dynamics
75
4
Figure 3: MALDI-‐TOF spectrum of [Pd(EtIm)3Cl]Cl taken in CHCl3, 1mg/ml. Inset: chemical structure
of [Pd(EtIm)3Cl]Cl and its simulated mass spectrum.
2D EXSY spectra
The mechanism of exchange between free and bound Im was investigated using 2D
exchange spectroscopy (EXSY18,19). To monitor the ligand exchange, complex 2 was mixed
with free ligand in deuterated chloroform (CDCl3). 2D EXSY spectra were taken in CDCl3 at RT
with several different mixing times (tmix). Spectra indicate that free Im (which is not
coordinated to Pd center, abbreviated as L) exchanges with Im coordinated to Pd on the
time scale of typical tmix of 100-‐500 ms. When tmix was lower than 200 ms, spectra showed
cross peaks for exchange of L with intermediate [Pd(EtIm)3Cl]Cl (I) and for Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 (C)
with I. However, only at higher mixing times (>200 ms) cross peaks for L-‐C exchange
becomes visible (Figure 4).
Figure 4: 2D EXSY spectra of 0.09 M solution of N-‐ethyl Imidazole and Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 in CDCl3 at tmix =
200 ms and tmix = 500 ms. Circles were used to highlight cross peaks appear when tmix is high (≥ 300
ms).
In order to investigate exchange rate constants, ratios of cross peaks to diagonal peaks were
calculated using absolute peak volumes at each tmix. C-‐L crosspeaks are absent at low
mixing times and only appear at mixing times above 200 ms. The absence of direct exchange
between C and L in the presence of C-‐I and L-‐I cross peaks demonstrates the intermediacy
of I in the ligand exchange process of Pd(EtIm)2Cl2. Dissociative ligand exchange rates are
too slow to give cross-‐peaks in the spectrum.
NN Pd NN
ClN
N
N NNN Pd N
ClN
Cl
L C I
+ Cl)
Chapter 4
76
Figure 3: MALDI-‐TOF spectrum of [Pd(EtIm)3Cl]Cl taken in CHCl3, 1mg/ml. Inset: chemical structure
of [Pd(EtIm)3Cl]Cl and its simulated mass spectrum.
2D EXSY spectra
The mechanism of exchange between free and bound Im was investigated using 2D
exchange spectroscopy (EXSY18,19). To monitor the ligand exchange, complex 2 was mixed
with free ligand in deuterated chloroform (CDCl3). 2D EXSY spectra were taken in CDCl3 at RT
with several different mixing times (tmix). Spectra indicate that free Im (which is not
coordinated to Pd center, abbreviated as L) exchanges with Im coordinated to Pd on the
time scale of typical tmix of 100-‐500 ms. When tmix was lower than 200 ms, spectra showed
cross peaks for exchange of L with intermediate [Pd(EtIm)3Cl]Cl (I) and for Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 (C)
with I. However, only at higher mixing times (>200 ms) cross peaks for L-‐C exchange
becomes visible (Figure 4).
Figure 4: 2D EXSY spectra of 0.09 M solution of N-‐ethyl Imidazole and Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 in CDCl3 at tmix =
200 ms and tmix = 500 ms. Circles were used to highlight cross peaks appear when tmix is high (≥ 300
ms).
In order to investigate exchange rate constants, ratios of cross peaks to diagonal peaks were
calculated using absolute peak volumes at each tmix. C-‐L crosspeaks are absent at low
mixing times and only appear at mixing times above 200 ms. The absence of direct exchange
between C and L in the presence of C-‐I and L-‐I cross peaks demonstrates the intermediacy
of I in the ligand exchange process of Pd(EtIm)2Cl2. Dissociative ligand exchange rates are
too slow to give cross-‐peaks in the spectrum.
NN Pd NN
ClN
N
N NNN Pd N
ClN
Cl
L C I
+ Cl)
Determination of ligand exchange dynamics
77
4
Figure 5: Graph of cross-‐peak intensities relative to diagonal intensities vs tmix for exchange between
C-‐I, L-‐I (left) and L-‐C (right).
On the other hand, for short mixing times, the intensity of C-‐I and L-‐I cross peaks increases
linearly with tmix indicating that these are direct exchange processes. Rate constants for
these processes were calculated from the slope of the transfer function ф vs tmix (Figure 6)
as described by Perrin and Dwyer.18 The (pseudo) first order rate constants were found to
be kL-‐I = 3.7 s–1 (r2 = 0.999) and kC-‐I = 3.2 s–1 (r2 = 0.999).
Figure 6: In order to determine rate
constants for two site exchange between
L-‐I and C-‐I by the equation 𝑘𝑘 = !!!"#
×ф,
the transfer functions (ф) were calculated
using the expression:ф = ln !!!!!!
where
𝑟𝑟 = !!!!!!!!!"!!!"
. Rate constants were
obtained from the slope of a plot of ф vs
tmix.
Sonication induced ligand exchange
Sonication induced ligand exchange was studied in toluene using polymer functionalized
complex Pd(Im-‐pTHF18)2Cl2 and a small molecule model complex at a 1:100 mole ratio.
Dodecyl Imidazole complex Pd(DodecIm)2Cl2 was used because of its high solubility in
toluene. MWs of the complexes are sufficiently different to allow monitoring of the ligand
exchange with GPC. 0.1 mM solutions of polymers were sonicated using a sonication probe
and solutions were saturated with CH4 by bubbling the gas through the solution starting 15
minutes prior to sonication. The temperature inside the sonication vessel was constant at
25 oC to prevent thermal reactions. This was done by circulation of water at 2oC between
the walls of the double-‐jacketed sonication vessel.
Mechanochemically induced ligand exchange resulted in fragmentation of Pd(Im-‐
pTHF18)2Cl2. Emergence of a new peak in GPC at a MW of 18 kDa was monitored over time.
This new peak is consistent with the formation of product with two different imidazole
ligands coordinated to the same metal center. 17% of the initial Pd(Im-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2
experienced ligand exchange after 2h of continuous sonication as monitored by GPC. On the
other hand, without sonication, the MW distribution of the mixture did not change over the
course of 2 h at RT, indicating that thermal ligand exchange between the complexes is slow.
Figure 7: Ultrasound induced ligand exchange between Pd(Im-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 (0.1 mM) and Pd(Im-‐
Dodec)2Cl2 without sonication (left) and with sonication (right). Molar ratio between polymer and
small molecule is 1:100.
Chapter 4
78
Figure 5: Graph of cross-‐peak intensities relative to diagonal intensities vs tmix for exchange between
C-‐I, L-‐I (left) and L-‐C (right).
On the other hand, for short mixing times, the intensity of C-‐I and L-‐I cross peaks increases
linearly with tmix indicating that these are direct exchange processes. Rate constants for
these processes were calculated from the slope of the transfer function ф vs tmix (Figure 6)
as described by Perrin and Dwyer.18 The (pseudo) first order rate constants were found to
be kL-‐I = 3.7 s–1 (r2 = 0.999) and kC-‐I = 3.2 s–1 (r2 = 0.999).
Figure 6: In order to determine rate
constants for two site exchange between
L-‐I and C-‐I by the equation 𝑘𝑘 = !!!"#
×ф,
the transfer functions (ф) were calculated
using the expression:ф = ln !!!!!!
where
𝑟𝑟 = !!!!!!!!!"!!!"
. Rate constants were
obtained from the slope of a plot of ф vs
tmix.
Sonication induced ligand exchange
Sonication induced ligand exchange was studied in toluene using polymer functionalized
complex Pd(Im-‐pTHF18)2Cl2 and a small molecule model complex at a 1:100 mole ratio.
Dodecyl Imidazole complex Pd(DodecIm)2Cl2 was used because of its high solubility in
toluene. MWs of the complexes are sufficiently different to allow monitoring of the ligand
exchange with GPC. 0.1 mM solutions of polymers were sonicated using a sonication probe
and solutions were saturated with CH4 by bubbling the gas through the solution starting 15
minutes prior to sonication. The temperature inside the sonication vessel was constant at
25 oC to prevent thermal reactions. This was done by circulation of water at 2oC between
the walls of the double-‐jacketed sonication vessel.
Mechanochemically induced ligand exchange resulted in fragmentation of Pd(Im-‐
pTHF18)2Cl2. Emergence of a new peak in GPC at a MW of 18 kDa was monitored over time.
This new peak is consistent with the formation of product with two different imidazole
ligands coordinated to the same metal center. 17% of the initial Pd(Im-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2
experienced ligand exchange after 2h of continuous sonication as monitored by GPC. On the
other hand, without sonication, the MW distribution of the mixture did not change over the
course of 2 h at RT, indicating that thermal ligand exchange between the complexes is slow.
Figure 7: Ultrasound induced ligand exchange between Pd(Im-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 (0.1 mM) and Pd(Im-‐
Dodec)2Cl2 without sonication (left) and with sonication (right). Molar ratio between polymer and
small molecule is 1:100.
Determination of ligand exchange dynamics
79
4
Figure 8: Ultrasound induced ligand exchange between Pd(Im-‐pTHF35k)2Cl2 (0.1 mM) and Pd(Im-‐
Dodec)2Cl2. Molar ratio between polymer and small molecule is 1:100.
Pd(Im-‐pTHF35k)2Cl2 polymer was also tested in sonication induced ligand exchange. After 1h
of continuous sonication, 40% of complexes were exchanged, a significantly higher fraction
than for the 36k complex. The molecular weight dependence of the rate demonstrates that
bond scission is a mechano-‐chemical process and not the result of local heating or reaction
with solvent decomposition products.
Rate of sonication induced chain scission
Figure 9: Concentration change of Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes during sonication in the presence of
Pd(DodecIm)2Cl2. Red lines represent linear fitting.
The rate of sonication induced chain scission was determined as described in Chapter 2.
Samples were taken during sonication and submitted to the GPC. Since area under the GPC
trace is proportional to the weight fraction of the polymer, change in polymer concentration
could be found by deconvolution of the GPC traces. Regardless of initial molecular weights
of polymer complex, the concentration of initial complex decreased linearly with sonication
time (Figure 9), suggesting that the consumption of complex is a zeroth order process, of
which the rate does not depend on the concentration of complex. This behavior is in stark
contrast to the experiments described in previous chapters, where the concentration of
polymer decayed exponentially during sonication, from which it was concluded that
mechanochemical chain scission follows first order reaction kinetics.
Thus, in the current experiments, the rate-‐determining step appears not to be the
mechanochemical dissociation of the polymer ligand, but a later step. In order to analyze
the process in more detail, rates of separate steps were calculated, and the overall process
was simulated.
Sonication induced ligand exchange between Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and Pd(Im-‐Dodec)2Cl2 involves
three main steps: i) dissociation of polymeric ligand under stress, ii) association of free
Chapter 4
80
Figure 8: Ultrasound induced ligand exchange between Pd(Im-‐pTHF35k)2Cl2 (0.1 mM) and Pd(Im-‐
Dodec)2Cl2. Molar ratio between polymer and small molecule is 1:100.
Pd(Im-‐pTHF35k)2Cl2 polymer was also tested in sonication induced ligand exchange. After 1h
of continuous sonication, 40% of complexes were exchanged, a significantly higher fraction
than for the 36k complex. The molecular weight dependence of the rate demonstrates that
bond scission is a mechano-‐chemical process and not the result of local heating or reaction
with solvent decomposition products.
Rate of sonication induced chain scission
Figure 9: Concentration change of Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes during sonication in the presence of
Pd(DodecIm)2Cl2. Red lines represent linear fitting.
The rate of sonication induced chain scission was determined as described in Chapter 2.
Samples were taken during sonication and submitted to the GPC. Since area under the GPC
trace is proportional to the weight fraction of the polymer, change in polymer concentration
could be found by deconvolution of the GPC traces. Regardless of initial molecular weights
of polymer complex, the concentration of initial complex decreased linearly with sonication
time (Figure 9), suggesting that the consumption of complex is a zeroth order process, of
which the rate does not depend on the concentration of complex. This behavior is in stark
contrast to the experiments described in previous chapters, where the concentration of
polymer decayed exponentially during sonication, from which it was concluded that
mechanochemical chain scission follows first order reaction kinetics.
Thus, in the current experiments, the rate-‐determining step appears not to be the
mechanochemical dissociation of the polymer ligand, but a later step. In order to analyze
the process in more detail, rates of separate steps were calculated, and the overall process
was simulated.
Sonication induced ligand exchange between Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and Pd(Im-‐Dodec)2Cl2 involves
three main steps: i) dissociation of polymeric ligand under stress, ii) association of free
Determination of ligand exchange dynamics
81
4
ligand to Pd(Im-‐Dodec)2Cl2 to form the tris-‐imidazole intermediate as mentioned above, and
iii) dissociation of one of the three ligands.
Relevant reactions during sonication are (Scheme 3);
𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 ↔ 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 + 𝑃𝑃 1
𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 + 𝐿𝐿 → 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 2
𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 + 𝑃𝑃 ↔ 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 3
𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 + 𝐿𝐿 ↔ 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 4
𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 + 𝐿𝐿 ↔ 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 5
𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 + 𝑃𝑃 ↔ 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 6
𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 + 𝑃𝑃 ↔ 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 7
𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 + 𝐿𝐿 ↔ 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 8
𝑃𝑃:𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 − 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝,𝑀𝑀:𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃! ,
𝐿𝐿: 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 (𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 − 𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷)
Scheme 3: Plausible mechanism for ultrasound induced ligand exchange between Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2
and Pd(Im-‐Dodec)2Cl2.
NNPd N NCl
N
NC₁₂H₂₅
Cl*
NN Pd N NCl
ClO O N N C₁₂H₂₅ NN Pd N N
Cl
ClO C₁₂H₂₅+
n n n
On
On
NN Pd N NCl
ClO O +
n nNN Pd N N
Cl
ClC₁₂H₂₅ C₁₂H₂₅
N N O +n
NN Pd N NCl
ClC₁₂H₂₅ C₁₂H₂₅
NNPd N NCl
N
N
Cl*
C₁₂H₂₅ C₁₂H₂₅
O
n
NN PdCl
ClO
nN N C₁₂H₂₅
NN Pd N NCl
ClO C₁₂H₂₅+
PMP LML
P
L
PMLL
PML
PMPL
PM PMLL
Chapter 4
82
ligand to Pd(Im-‐Dodec)2Cl2 to form the tris-‐imidazole intermediate as mentioned above, and
iii) dissociation of one of the three ligands.
Relevant reactions during sonication are (Scheme 3);
𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 ↔ 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 + 𝑃𝑃 1
𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 + 𝐿𝐿 → 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 2
𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 + 𝑃𝑃 ↔ 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 3
𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 + 𝐿𝐿 ↔ 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 4
𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 + 𝐿𝐿 ↔ 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 5
𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 + 𝑃𝑃 ↔ 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 6
𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 + 𝑃𝑃 ↔ 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 7
𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 + 𝐿𝐿 ↔ 𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 8
𝑃𝑃:𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 − 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝,𝑀𝑀:𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃! ,
𝐿𝐿: 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 (𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 − 𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷)
Scheme 3: Plausible mechanism for ultrasound induced ligand exchange between Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2
and Pd(Im-‐Dodec)2Cl2.
NNPd N NCl
N
NC₁₂H₂₅
Cl*
NN Pd N NCl
ClO O N N C₁₂H₂₅ NN Pd N N
Cl
ClO C₁₂H₂₅+
n n n
On
On
NN Pd N NCl
ClO O +
n nNN Pd N N
Cl
ClC₁₂H₂₅ C₁₂H₂₅
N N O +n
NN Pd N NCl
ClC₁₂H₂₅ C₁₂H₂₅
NNPd N NCl
N
N
Cl*
C₁₂H₂₅ C₁₂H₂₅
O
n
NN PdCl
ClO
nN N C₁₂H₂₅
NN Pd N NCl
ClO C₁₂H₂₅+
PMP LML
P
L
PMLL
PML
PMPL
PM PMLL
Determination of ligand exchange dynamics
83
4
Relative peak areas in 1H NMR spectrum of the small molecule intermediate (Figure 2) give a
1:5:5 ratio of equilibrium concentrations of I:C:L. Since the initial concentrations of C and L
are 0.09 M,
𝐿𝐿 ! = 0.09𝑀𝑀, 𝐶𝐶 ! = 0.09𝑀𝑀, [𝐼𝐼] = [𝐶𝐶] 5
𝐼𝐼 = 0.015 𝑀𝑀 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝐶𝐶 , 𝐿𝐿 = 0.075
the association constant can be calculated as
𝐾𝐾! = [𝐼𝐼]
[𝐶𝐶]×[𝐸𝐸] =0.0150.075! ≅ 2.7 𝑀𝑀!!
Rate constants in scission experiments can be written as:
Pd(Im-‐pTHF-‐35k)2Cl2 showed 40% chain scission after 1h sonication, so the scission rate
constant k1 should be higher than 10-‐4 s-‐1. The reverse reaction and reaction (2) are assumed
to be diffusion controlled. We used the diffusion controlled association constant calculated
previously for UPy dimers in toluene (k-‐1 = 108 M-‐1s-‐1)20
𝐾𝐾 =𝑘𝑘!!
𝑘𝑘! + 𝑘𝑘!=
𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 𝑃𝑃
where k2 is sum of rates for reactions that involves polymeric ligand, P. Those reactions are
(3), (6) and (7).
The steps in the exchange process were modeled in the metabolic modeling program
GEPASI21 in order to verify that the combination of elementary reaction rate constants
discussed above results in a linear decrease of the polymer concentration during sonication.
When the rate constants and equilibrium concentrations as calculated above were used in
simulation, the polymer concentration indeed decreased linearly in time (Figure 10). The
simulations showed that this is caused by the slow kinetics of the ligand association step
(i.e. third ligand coordinates to Pd(NIm)2 complex, reaction (3) in Scheme 3).
P M P P M +k₁
k&₁
P
Figure 10: Simulated plot for change in polymer concentration during sonication vs. time using
GEPASI compared to the data that was obtained experimentally.
Conclusions
The ligand exchange mechanism for imidazole Palladium complexes has been investigated in
the presence of excess free imidazole ligand in CHCl3 as an associative process. When
Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 and EtIm were mixed, a tris imidazolyl intermediate complex [Pd(EtIm)3Cl]Cl
was identified by NMR and MALDI-‐TOF. It has been shown with 2D EXSY that there is direct
magnetization transfer between Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 and the intermediate. However, exchange
between Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 and EtIm is indirect, and proceeds via the stable intermediate
[Pd(EtIm)3Cl]Cl.
Complexes with monotelechelic polymeric ligands Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 were sonicated in the
presence of Pd(Im-‐Dodec)2Cl2 and GPC traces showed that during sonication polymeric
ligands dissociate from the central metal.
Previously, the rate of sonication induced chain scission in coordination complexes was
investigated for NHC bearing Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 in the presence of trapping agents (AcOH
and MeCN). These trapping agents coordinate to the metal center and protonate the free
carbene released when the bond between metal and ligand is broken. Although it has been
established in previous chapters that the bond scission observed during sonication of these
complexes is mechanically induced, it is still arguable that trapping agents play a role in
thermally induced chain scission by destabilizing the coordination bond. However, the
ultrasound induced ligand exchange presented in this chapter occurs in the absence of
Chapter 4
84
Relative peak areas in 1H NMR spectrum of the small molecule intermediate (Figure 2) give a
1:5:5 ratio of equilibrium concentrations of I:C:L. Since the initial concentrations of C and L
are 0.09 M,
𝐿𝐿 ! = 0.09𝑀𝑀, 𝐶𝐶 ! = 0.09𝑀𝑀, [𝐼𝐼] = [𝐶𝐶] 5
𝐼𝐼 = 0.015 𝑀𝑀 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝐶𝐶 , 𝐿𝐿 = 0.075
the association constant can be calculated as
𝐾𝐾! = [𝐼𝐼]
[𝐶𝐶]×[𝐸𝐸] =0.0150.075! ≅ 2.7 𝑀𝑀!!
Rate constants in scission experiments can be written as:
Pd(Im-‐pTHF-‐35k)2Cl2 showed 40% chain scission after 1h sonication, so the scission rate
constant k1 should be higher than 10-‐4 s-‐1. The reverse reaction and reaction (2) are assumed
to be diffusion controlled. We used the diffusion controlled association constant calculated
previously for UPy dimers in toluene (k-‐1 = 108 M-‐1s-‐1)20
𝐾𝐾 =𝑘𝑘!!
𝑘𝑘! + 𝑘𝑘!=
𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 𝑃𝑃
where k2 is sum of rates for reactions that involves polymeric ligand, P. Those reactions are
(3), (6) and (7).
The steps in the exchange process were modeled in the metabolic modeling program
GEPASI21 in order to verify that the combination of elementary reaction rate constants
discussed above results in a linear decrease of the polymer concentration during sonication.
When the rate constants and equilibrium concentrations as calculated above were used in
simulation, the polymer concentration indeed decreased linearly in time (Figure 10). The
simulations showed that this is caused by the slow kinetics of the ligand association step
(i.e. third ligand coordinates to Pd(NIm)2 complex, reaction (3) in Scheme 3).
P M P P M +k₁
k&₁
P
Figure 10: Simulated plot for change in polymer concentration during sonication vs. time using
GEPASI compared to the data that was obtained experimentally.
Conclusions
The ligand exchange mechanism for imidazole Palladium complexes has been investigated in
the presence of excess free imidazole ligand in CHCl3 as an associative process. When
Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 and EtIm were mixed, a tris imidazolyl intermediate complex [Pd(EtIm)3Cl]Cl
was identified by NMR and MALDI-‐TOF. It has been shown with 2D EXSY that there is direct
magnetization transfer between Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 and the intermediate. However, exchange
between Pd(EtIm)2Cl2 and EtIm is indirect, and proceeds via the stable intermediate
[Pd(EtIm)3Cl]Cl.
Complexes with monotelechelic polymeric ligands Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 were sonicated in the
presence of Pd(Im-‐Dodec)2Cl2 and GPC traces showed that during sonication polymeric
ligands dissociate from the central metal.
Previously, the rate of sonication induced chain scission in coordination complexes was
investigated for NHC bearing Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 in the presence of trapping agents (AcOH
and MeCN). These trapping agents coordinate to the metal center and protonate the free
carbene released when the bond between metal and ligand is broken. Although it has been
established in previous chapters that the bond scission observed during sonication of these
complexes is mechanically induced, it is still arguable that trapping agents play a role in
thermally induced chain scission by destabilizing the coordination bond. However, the
ultrasound induced ligand exchange presented in this chapter occurs in the absence of
Determination of ligand exchange dynamics
85
4
trapping agents, and thermal processes would lead to the formation of an equilibrium
mixture of starting material and product Pd[(Im-‐pTHF)(Im-‐Dodec)]Cl2. The selective
formation of product therefore further proves that the scission is mechanochemical. The
direction of the reaction is governed by the fact that the coordination bond in the product
Pd[(Im-‐pTHF)(Im-‐Dodec)]Cl2 is not responsive to mechanical stress because it is at the end
of the polymer chain, where solvodynamic forces are too low to cause scission.
Experimental
General
All chemicals were purchased from commercial sources used without further purification unless
specified otherwise. Dry tetrahydrofuran (THF, HPLC grade) and dichloromethane (DCM) were
degassed with argon and purified by passage through activated alumina solvent column prior to use.
Sodium hydride was 60% dispersion in mineral oil as obtained from commercial source washed with
n-‐hexane under Ar in a Schlenk flask prior to use. A Varian 400MR or a Varian Mercury 400
spectrometer was used to record 1H NMR (400 MHz) Chemical shifts are reported in ppm and
referenced to chemical shifts for tetramethylsilane or residual solvents. 2D EXSY spectra were
recorded on Varian Inova 500 spectrometer with NOESY pulse sequence. Gel permeation
chromatography (GPC) was performed on a Shimadzu LC10-‐AD, using Polymer Laboratories PL Gel
5μm MIXED-‐C and MIXEDD columns (linear range of MW: 200–2000000 g/mol), a Shimadzu SPD-‐
M10A UV-‐vis detector at 254 nm and RID-‐10A refractive index detector, and THF as eluent at a flow
rate of 1 mL/min (20 °C). Polystyrene standards were used for calibration.
Sonication experiments
A homemade, double-‐jacketed glass reactor with a volume of 10 mL was used in the sonication
experiments. A Sonics and Materials 20 kHz, 0.5 in. diameter titanium alloy ultrasound probe with
half wave extension (parts 630-‐0220 and 630-‐0410) was operated using a Sonics and Materials
VC750 power supply. The temperature in the reactor was maintained with a Lauda E300 cooling
bath and measured using a 0.5 mm diameter thermocouple. Solutions were sonicated continuously,
temperature of the solution were checked by thermocouple was constant at 25oC after the thermal
equilibrium was achieved in the first 3-‐5 mins. During sonication saturation gas (CH4) was bubbled
through solution via teflon tubing. Aliquots of 100 µL were taken at different time intervals. Toluene
was removed under reduced pressure and residues were dissolved in THF and submitted to GPC.
Results were analyzed and concentration change during sonication was determined by double
Gaussian de-‐convolution method.
Synthesis of α-‐(N-‐imidazole)-‐ω-‐methoxy poly(tetrahydrofuran)
Polymer ligands (Im-‐pTHF) were synthesized via cationic ring-‐opening polymerization of
tetrahydrofuran (THF).22 THF (100 mL) and DTBP (200 µL, 0.92 mmol) were added methyl triflate
(100 µL, 0.91 mmol) inside a Schlenk round-‐bottom flask under Ar to initiate the polymerization. End
capper imidazolyl was prepared in a separate round bottom flask. Imidazole (306 mg, 4.5 mmol) was
added in portions onto NaH (400 mg, 10 mmol) dispersion in dry THF (10 ml) under Ar. After stirring
for defined time as described in chapter 2, the polymerization was terminated by adding imidazolyl
solution in one portion to polymerization flask. After 20 mins, 10 ml MeOH was added, the solution
was diluted to app ¼ of its initial volume under reduced pressure and precipitated in water (400 mL)
overnight at ambient temperature. White polymer was washed with water, dissolved in diethyl
ether (200 mL), dried over MgSO4 and precipitated overnight at –30 °C, white powder was filtered
washed with cold Et2O and yielded ligands as white powder. In order to remove traces of solvents,
ligands were left under vacuum at ambient temperature overnight prior to use. Molecular weights
were determined by MALDI-‐TOF as 18 kDa and 35 kDa depending on the polymerization time (2h
and 3.5h respectively). 1H NMR Im-‐pTHF18k [CD2Cl2, 400 MHz]: 7.84 ppm (s, Im), 7.17 ppm (s, Im),
7.06 ppm (s, Im), 4.08 ppm (t, N-‐CH2, J: 8Hz), 3.0-‐3.6 ppm (br O-‐CH2-‐), 1.3-‐2.2 ppm (br, OCH2-‐CH2-‐).
Synthesis of Pd(II)–imidazole polymer complexes Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2.
Im-‐pTHF (400 mg) was dissolved in DCM (10 ml) and added Pd(MeCN)2Cl2 (0.5 eq.). Ligand exchange
yielded desired polymer attached mechanophores after 2h. Solvent was evaporated under reduced
pressure. 1H NMR Pd(Im-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 [CD2Cl2, 400 MHz]: 8.03 ppm (s, Im), 7.38 ppm (s, Im), 6.67
ppm (s, Im), 3.98 ppm (t, N-‐CH2, J: 8Hz), 3.0-‐3.6 ppm (br O-‐CH2-‐), 1.3-‐2.2 ppm (br, OCH2-‐CH2-‐).
Chapter 4
86
trapping agents, and thermal processes would lead to the formation of an equilibrium
mixture of starting material and product Pd[(Im-‐pTHF)(Im-‐Dodec)]Cl2. The selective
formation of product therefore further proves that the scission is mechanochemical. The
direction of the reaction is governed by the fact that the coordination bond in the product
Pd[(Im-‐pTHF)(Im-‐Dodec)]Cl2 is not responsive to mechanical stress because it is at the end
of the polymer chain, where solvodynamic forces are too low to cause scission.
Experimental
General
All chemicals were purchased from commercial sources used without further purification unless
specified otherwise. Dry tetrahydrofuran (THF, HPLC grade) and dichloromethane (DCM) were
degassed with argon and purified by passage through activated alumina solvent column prior to use.
Sodium hydride was 60% dispersion in mineral oil as obtained from commercial source washed with
n-‐hexane under Ar in a Schlenk flask prior to use. A Varian 400MR or a Varian Mercury 400
spectrometer was used to record 1H NMR (400 MHz) Chemical shifts are reported in ppm and
referenced to chemical shifts for tetramethylsilane or residual solvents. 2D EXSY spectra were
recorded on Varian Inova 500 spectrometer with NOESY pulse sequence. Gel permeation
chromatography (GPC) was performed on a Shimadzu LC10-‐AD, using Polymer Laboratories PL Gel
5μm MIXED-‐C and MIXEDD columns (linear range of MW: 200–2000000 g/mol), a Shimadzu SPD-‐
M10A UV-‐vis detector at 254 nm and RID-‐10A refractive index detector, and THF as eluent at a flow
rate of 1 mL/min (20 °C). Polystyrene standards were used for calibration.
Sonication experiments
A homemade, double-‐jacketed glass reactor with a volume of 10 mL was used in the sonication
experiments. A Sonics and Materials 20 kHz, 0.5 in. diameter titanium alloy ultrasound probe with
half wave extension (parts 630-‐0220 and 630-‐0410) was operated using a Sonics and Materials
VC750 power supply. The temperature in the reactor was maintained with a Lauda E300 cooling
bath and measured using a 0.5 mm diameter thermocouple. Solutions were sonicated continuously,
temperature of the solution were checked by thermocouple was constant at 25oC after the thermal
equilibrium was achieved in the first 3-‐5 mins. During sonication saturation gas (CH4) was bubbled
through solution via teflon tubing. Aliquots of 100 µL were taken at different time intervals. Toluene
was removed under reduced pressure and residues were dissolved in THF and submitted to GPC.
Results were analyzed and concentration change during sonication was determined by double
Gaussian de-‐convolution method.
Synthesis of α-‐(N-‐imidazole)-‐ω-‐methoxy poly(tetrahydrofuran)
Polymer ligands (Im-‐pTHF) were synthesized via cationic ring-‐opening polymerization of
tetrahydrofuran (THF).22 THF (100 mL) and DTBP (200 µL, 0.92 mmol) were added methyl triflate
(100 µL, 0.91 mmol) inside a Schlenk round-‐bottom flask under Ar to initiate the polymerization. End
capper imidazolyl was prepared in a separate round bottom flask. Imidazole (306 mg, 4.5 mmol) was
added in portions onto NaH (400 mg, 10 mmol) dispersion in dry THF (10 ml) under Ar. After stirring
for defined time as described in chapter 2, the polymerization was terminated by adding imidazolyl
solution in one portion to polymerization flask. After 20 mins, 10 ml MeOH was added, the solution
was diluted to app ¼ of its initial volume under reduced pressure and precipitated in water (400 mL)
overnight at ambient temperature. White polymer was washed with water, dissolved in diethyl
ether (200 mL), dried over MgSO4 and precipitated overnight at –30 °C, white powder was filtered
washed with cold Et2O and yielded ligands as white powder. In order to remove traces of solvents,
ligands were left under vacuum at ambient temperature overnight prior to use. Molecular weights
were determined by MALDI-‐TOF as 18 kDa and 35 kDa depending on the polymerization time (2h
and 3.5h respectively). 1H NMR Im-‐pTHF18k [CD2Cl2, 400 MHz]: 7.84 ppm (s, Im), 7.17 ppm (s, Im),
7.06 ppm (s, Im), 4.08 ppm (t, N-‐CH2, J: 8Hz), 3.0-‐3.6 ppm (br O-‐CH2-‐), 1.3-‐2.2 ppm (br, OCH2-‐CH2-‐).
Synthesis of Pd(II)–imidazole polymer complexes Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2.
Im-‐pTHF (400 mg) was dissolved in DCM (10 ml) and added Pd(MeCN)2Cl2 (0.5 eq.). Ligand exchange
yielded desired polymer attached mechanophores after 2h. Solvent was evaporated under reduced
pressure. 1H NMR Pd(Im-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 [CD2Cl2, 400 MHz]: 8.03 ppm (s, Im), 7.38 ppm (s, Im), 6.67
ppm (s, Im), 3.98 ppm (t, N-‐CH2, J: 8Hz), 3.0-‐3.6 ppm (br O-‐CH2-‐), 1.3-‐2.2 ppm (br, OCH2-‐CH2-‐).
Determination of ligand exchange dynamics
87
4
References
(1) Beck, J. B.; Rowan, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125 (46), 13922–13923.
(2) Dobrawa, R.; Würthner, F. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2005, 43 (21), 4981–4995.
(3) Yount, W. C.; Juwarker, H.; Craig, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125 (50), 15302–15303.
(4) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Chem. Commun. 2003, No. 13, 1494–1495.
(5) Vermonden, T.; van der Gucht, J.; de Waard, P.; Marcelis, A. T. M.; Besseling, N. A. M.;
Sudhölter, E. J. R.; Fleer, G. J.; Cohen Stuart, M. A. Macromolecules 2003, 36 (19), 7035–7044.
(6) Michelsen, U.; Hunter, C. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39 (4), 764–767.
(7) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Angew. Chem.-‐Int. Ed. 2004, 43 (34), 4460–4462.
(8) Piermattei, A.; Karthikeyan, S.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1 (2), 133–137.
(9) Suslick, K. S.; Price, G. J. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1999, 29 (1), 295–326.
(10) Nakano, A.; Minoura, Y. Macromolecules 1975, 8 (5), 677–680.
(11) Groote, R.; van Haandel, L.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2012, 50 (23),
4929–4935.
(12) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2006, 44 (19), 5445–5453.
(13) Basolo, F.; Chatt, J.; Gray, H. B.; Pearson, R. G.; Shaw, B. L. J. Chem. Soc. Resumed 1961, No. 0,
2207–2215.
(14) Cramer, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94 (16), 5681–5685.
(15) Johnson, L. K.; Killian, C. M.; Brookhart, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117 (23), 6414–6415.
(16) Ghosh, P. K.; Mandal, H. K.; Mahapatra, A. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2011, 43 (3), 130–140.
(17) Szulmanowicz, M. S.; Zawartka, W.; Gniewek, A.; Trzeciak, A. M. Inorganica Chim. Acta 2010,
363 (15), 4346–4354.
(18) Perrin, C. L.; Dwyer, T. J. Chem. Rev. 1990, 90 (6), 935–967.
(19) Dwyer, T. J.; Norman, J. E.; Jasien, P. G. J. Chem. Educ. 1998, 75 (12), 1635.
(20) Söntjens, S. H. M.; Sijbesma, R. P.; van Genderen, M. H. P.; Meijer, E. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122 (31), 7487–7493.
(21) Mendes, P. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1997, 22 (9), 361–363.
(22) Madras, G.; Chung, G. Y.; Smith, J. M.; McCoy, B. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997, 36 (6), 2019–
2024.
(23) Vijayalakshmi, S. P.; Madras, G. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005, 90 (1), 116–122.
(24) Odell, J. A.; Keller, A. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 1986, 24 (9), 1889–1916.
(25) Odell, J. A.; Muller, A. J.; Narh, K. A.; Keller, A. Macromolecules 1990, 23 (12), 3092–3103.
Chapter 4
88
Chapter 5Mechanochemically induced, directed ligand exchange in polymeric Pd(II) complexes
Mechanochemically induced ligand exchange of Pd(II) complexes was used to direct the for-
mation of heterocomplexes. Symmetric complexes with high and low molecular weight po-
lymer-attached ligands were mixed in solution and sonicated. When one of the complexes
has a molecular weight higher than the threshold (Mlim) for mechanochemical chain scission,
while the other is smaller, sonication leads to the directed formation of a heterocomplex
with two different ligands.
References
(1) Beck, J. B.; Rowan, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125 (46), 13922–13923.
(2) Dobrawa, R.; Würthner, F. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2005, 43 (21), 4981–4995.
(3) Yount, W. C.; Juwarker, H.; Craig, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125 (50), 15302–15303.
(4) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Chem. Commun. 2003, No. 13, 1494–1495.
(5) Vermonden, T.; van der Gucht, J.; de Waard, P.; Marcelis, A. T. M.; Besseling, N. A. M.;
Sudhölter, E. J. R.; Fleer, G. J.; Cohen Stuart, M. A. Macromolecules 2003, 36 (19), 7035–7044.
(6) Michelsen, U.; Hunter, C. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39 (4), 764–767.
(7) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Angew. Chem.-‐Int. Ed. 2004, 43 (34), 4460–4462.
(8) Piermattei, A.; Karthikeyan, S.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1 (2), 133–137.
(9) Suslick, K. S.; Price, G. J. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1999, 29 (1), 295–326.
(10) Nakano, A.; Minoura, Y. Macromolecules 1975, 8 (5), 677–680.
(11) Groote, R.; van Haandel, L.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2012, 50 (23),
4929–4935.
(12) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2006, 44 (19), 5445–5453.
(13) Basolo, F.; Chatt, J.; Gray, H. B.; Pearson, R. G.; Shaw, B. L. J. Chem. Soc. Resumed 1961, No. 0,
2207–2215.
(14) Cramer, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94 (16), 5681–5685.
(15) Johnson, L. K.; Killian, C. M.; Brookhart, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117 (23), 6414–6415.
(16) Ghosh, P. K.; Mandal, H. K.; Mahapatra, A. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2011, 43 (3), 130–140.
(17) Szulmanowicz, M. S.; Zawartka, W.; Gniewek, A.; Trzeciak, A. M. Inorganica Chim. Acta 2010,
363 (15), 4346–4354.
(18) Perrin, C. L.; Dwyer, T. J. Chem. Rev. 1990, 90 (6), 935–967.
(19) Dwyer, T. J.; Norman, J. E.; Jasien, P. G. J. Chem. Educ. 1998, 75 (12), 1635.
(20) Söntjens, S. H. M.; Sijbesma, R. P.; van Genderen, M. H. P.; Meijer, E. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122 (31), 7487–7493.
(21) Mendes, P. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1997, 22 (9), 361–363.
(22) Madras, G.; Chung, G. Y.; Smith, J. M.; McCoy, B. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997, 36 (6), 2019–
2024.
(23) Vijayalakshmi, S. P.; Madras, G. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005, 90 (1), 116–122.
(24) Odell, J. A.; Keller, A. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 1986, 24 (9), 1889–1916.
(25) Odell, J. A.; Muller, A. J.; Narh, K. A.; Keller, A. Macromolecules 1990, 23 (12), 3092–3103.
Introduction
Coordination polymers (CPs) have been used as mechanoresponsive polymers for
mechanical release of reactive groups, such as catalytically active sites, luminescent end
groups and small molecules.1–6 Our research group has shown that the coordination sphere
of transition-‐metal complexes in the main chain of CPs can be manipulated in solution by
ultrasound.7 The force required to break metal−ligand bond is much lower than the force
that is typically required to break covalent bonds.8 Thus, ultrasonication of CPs enables the
specific rupture of metal ligand coordination bonds. 9
Mechanical chain scission in reversible bonds drives dynamic systems away from
equilibrium. Paulusse showed, for instance, that the ring chain equilibrium in Pd-‐phosphine
coordination polymers is shifted reversibly by ultrasound.10 The equilibrium composition of
coordination polymer solutions can also be changed by ultrasound. As described in Chapter
4, Pd(Im)2Cl2 complexes in toluene do not show ligand exchange at room temperature.
However, when free imidazole is present, it replaces one of the coordinated imidazoles via
an associative mechanism, which results in ligand exchange. This offers a method to
selectively change the composition of a mixture of complexes by mechanochemical
activation.
Scheme 1: PdCl2-‐Imidazole complexes are kinetically stable against ligand exchange in the absence
of free ligand (top). Sonication dissociates one of the ligands of the polymeric complex by selectively
breaking the metal ligand bond. Then, released free ligand induces associative ligand exchange.
Provided that the molecular weight (MW) one of the complexes is above the limiting MW
(Mlim),11,12 to break the metal ligand bond by ultrasound, ligands can be exchanged and the
equilibrium will shift to the hetero-‐complex. Since mechanical force on the weak
coordinative bond increases with chain length, only polymer that has high MW, is
mechanically labile and breaks upon sonication. Free ligand binds to other complex in the
NN Pd N NCl
ClO O
NN PdCl
ClO
nN N O NN Pd N N
Cl
ClC12H25 C12H25
NN Pd N NCl
ClO
nC12H25
+
NN Pd N NCl
ClC12H25 C12H25+ x
solution and results in a solution with non-‐equilibrium composition (Scheme 1). In principle,
this feature of mechanochemical polymer scission allows formation of block copolymers
from a mixture of two symmetric coordination complexes (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Cartoon representation for the mechanochemically initiated block copolymerization.
In this chapter we investigate the potential of sonication-‐induced directed ligand exchange
towards copolymerization. Mechanical stress created in solution by implosion of cavitation
bubbles is used to transfer polymeric ligands from one metal center to another. This leads
to hetero-‐complexes with different ligands or different polymers attached to them. In order
to investigate mechanically directed ligand exchange three sets of experiments were
conducted. Firstly, two Pd(Im)2Cl2 complexes with different molecular weights were mixed
and the solution was subjected to ultrasound. Secondly, pTHF attached Pd complexes with
different ligands, NHC and Imidazole, were mixed to monitor the ultrasound-‐induced
formation of heterocomplex. Finally, Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 was mixed with poly(methylacrylate)
attached pyridine (Py-‐pMA) complex of palladium, Pd(PyPMA)2Cl2, and sonicated to form a
block copolymer linked by Pd coordination. In all three cases change in MW distribution of
mixtures and formation of new species were monitored by GPC.
Chapter 5
90
Introduction
Coordination polymers (CPs) have been used as mechanoresponsive polymers for
mechanical release of reactive groups, such as catalytically active sites, luminescent end
groups and small molecules.1–6 Our research group has shown that the coordination sphere
of transition-‐metal complexes in the main chain of CPs can be manipulated in solution by
ultrasound.7 The force required to break metal−ligand bond is much lower than the force
that is typically required to break covalent bonds.8 Thus, ultrasonication of CPs enables the
specific rupture of metal ligand coordination bonds. 9
Mechanical chain scission in reversible bonds drives dynamic systems away from
equilibrium. Paulusse showed, for instance, that the ring chain equilibrium in Pd-‐phosphine
coordination polymers is shifted reversibly by ultrasound.10 The equilibrium composition of
coordination polymer solutions can also be changed by ultrasound. As described in Chapter
4, Pd(Im)2Cl2 complexes in toluene do not show ligand exchange at room temperature.
However, when free imidazole is present, it replaces one of the coordinated imidazoles via
an associative mechanism, which results in ligand exchange. This offers a method to
selectively change the composition of a mixture of complexes by mechanochemical
activation.
Scheme 1: PdCl2-‐Imidazole complexes are kinetically stable against ligand exchange in the absence
of free ligand (top). Sonication dissociates one of the ligands of the polymeric complex by selectively
breaking the metal ligand bond. Then, released free ligand induces associative ligand exchange.
Provided that the molecular weight (MW) one of the complexes is above the limiting MW
(Mlim),11,12 to break the metal ligand bond by ultrasound, ligands can be exchanged and the
equilibrium will shift to the hetero-‐complex. Since mechanical force on the weak
coordinative bond increases with chain length, only polymer that has high MW, is
mechanically labile and breaks upon sonication. Free ligand binds to other complex in the
NN Pd N NCl
ClO O
NN PdCl
ClO
nN N O NN Pd N N
Cl
ClC12H25 C12H25
NN Pd N NCl
ClO
nC12H25
+
NN Pd N NCl
ClC12H25 C12H25+ x
solution and results in a solution with non-‐equilibrium composition (Scheme 1). In principle,
this feature of mechanochemical polymer scission allows formation of block copolymers
from a mixture of two symmetric coordination complexes (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Cartoon representation for the mechanochemically initiated block copolymerization.
In this chapter we investigate the potential of sonication-‐induced directed ligand exchange
towards copolymerization. Mechanical stress created in solution by implosion of cavitation
bubbles is used to transfer polymeric ligands from one metal center to another. This leads
to hetero-‐complexes with different ligands or different polymers attached to them. In order
to investigate mechanically directed ligand exchange three sets of experiments were
conducted. Firstly, two Pd(Im)2Cl2 complexes with different molecular weights were mixed
and the solution was subjected to ultrasound. Secondly, pTHF attached Pd complexes with
different ligands, NHC and Imidazole, were mixed to monitor the ultrasound-‐induced
formation of heterocomplex. Finally, Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 was mixed with poly(methylacrylate)
attached pyridine (Py-‐pMA) complex of palladium, Pd(PyPMA)2Cl2, and sonicated to form a
block copolymer linked by Pd coordination. In all three cases change in MW distribution of
mixtures and formation of new species were monitored by GPC.
Mechanochemically induced, directed ligand exchange
91
5
Results and discussions
Polymer (pTHF) attached imidalozyl ligands (Im-‐pTHF) were prepared by terminating
cationic ring opening polymerization of THF sodium imidazolate. pTHF-‐Im ligands with
molecular weights of 30k and 6k were synthesized by adjusting polymerization time. 1H
NMR, GPC and MALDI-‐TOF were used to characterize the ligands. Molecular weights are
given as the peak MW determined by MALDI-‐TOF.
Figure 2: GPC traces of Pd(Im-‐pTHF-‐30k)2Cl2 (left) and Pd(Im-‐pTHF-‐6k)2Cl2 (right)
Symmetrical complexes Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 were prepared by simply mixing polymer attached
Im-‐pTHF ligands with Pd(MeCN)2Cl2. GPC traces indicating a doubling of molecular weight
compared to the free ligands. (Figure 2) The peaks in the GPC traces of the 60 kDa and 12
kDa bis(imidazole)-‐Pd complexes have shoulders on the low MW side. 1H NMR did not
reveal peaks for un-‐complexed imidazole, which suggest that the shoulders correspond to
unfunctionalized pTHF not end-‐capped with imidazole.
Figure 3: GPC trace the mixture of 60 kDa and 12 kDa bis(imidazole)-‐Pd complexes after thermal
equilibrium has been reached by heating a mixture of Pd(Im-‐pTHF30k)2Cl2 and Pd(Im-‐pTHF6k)2Cl2 at
60 °C for 8 h.
When the two coordination polymers of 60 kDa and 12 kDa were mixed in toluene at a 1:1
ratio, no ligand exchange was observed after 2 h, thus the polymers are inert to each other.
However, after 8h at 60 oC the GPC trace showed the formation of a new species with
intermediate molecular weight (Figure 3).
A possible explanation for that could be at high temperatures complexes are more dynamic
and exchange their ligands, thus a new coordination polymer, which has one ligand from
each complex, was formed (monitored by GPC). When thermal equilibrium was established,
a statistical mixture was obtained containing three polymers with different MWs.
Chapter 5
92
Results and discussions
Polymer (pTHF) attached imidalozyl ligands (Im-‐pTHF) were prepared by terminating
cationic ring opening polymerization of THF sodium imidazolate. pTHF-‐Im ligands with
molecular weights of 30k and 6k were synthesized by adjusting polymerization time. 1H
NMR, GPC and MALDI-‐TOF were used to characterize the ligands. Molecular weights are
given as the peak MW determined by MALDI-‐TOF.
Figure 2: GPC traces of Pd(Im-‐pTHF-‐30k)2Cl2 (left) and Pd(Im-‐pTHF-‐6k)2Cl2 (right)
Symmetrical complexes Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 were prepared by simply mixing polymer attached
Im-‐pTHF ligands with Pd(MeCN)2Cl2. GPC traces indicating a doubling of molecular weight
compared to the free ligands. (Figure 2) The peaks in the GPC traces of the 60 kDa and 12
kDa bis(imidazole)-‐Pd complexes have shoulders on the low MW side. 1H NMR did not
reveal peaks for un-‐complexed imidazole, which suggest that the shoulders correspond to
unfunctionalized pTHF not end-‐capped with imidazole.
Figure 3: GPC trace the mixture of 60 kDa and 12 kDa bis(imidazole)-‐Pd complexes after thermal
equilibrium has been reached by heating a mixture of Pd(Im-‐pTHF30k)2Cl2 and Pd(Im-‐pTHF6k)2Cl2 at
60 °C for 8 h.
When the two coordination polymers of 60 kDa and 12 kDa were mixed in toluene at a 1:1
ratio, no ligand exchange was observed after 2 h, thus the polymers are inert to each other.
However, after 8h at 60 oC the GPC trace showed the formation of a new species with
intermediate molecular weight (Figure 3).
A possible explanation for that could be at high temperatures complexes are more dynamic
and exchange their ligands, thus a new coordination polymer, which has one ligand from
each complex, was formed (monitored by GPC). When thermal equilibrium was established,
a statistical mixture was obtained containing three polymers with different MWs.
Mechanochemically induced, directed ligand exchange
93
5
Figure 4: GPC traces for polymer sample after sonicating the mixture of Pd(Im-‐pTHF30k)2Cl2 and
Pd(Im-‐pTHF6k)2Cl2 for 2h. New polymer was obtained with 35 kDa which corresponds to the MW for
Pd(NHC-‐pTHF30k)(Im-‐pTHF6k)Cl2.
We anticipated that the product distribution could be biased by mechanical initiation of
exchange when the same mixture was sonicated instead of heated. To investigate this, a 1:1
mixture of coordination polymers Pd(Im-‐pTHF30k)2Cl2 and Pd(Im-‐pTHF6k)2Cl2 was sonicated
for 2h. After sonication the GPC trace revealed a single peak at 35 kDa with small shoulders
corresponding to initial polymers.
After ligand exchange, the metal center is not located in the middle of the polymer chain.
Since the solvodynamic force reaches a maximum value at the center due to the
centrosymmetric nature of the flow field with respect to the molecule,11,13,14 the product is
not responsive to the mechanical stress although its MW is above the Mlim to break Pd-‐
imidazole bond.
Mechanochemical synthesis of hetero-‐complexes
In order to investigate the directed mechanochemical formation of hetero-‐complexes two
structurally different ligands coordinated in the same metal center, Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and
Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2, were mixed. Both complexes are kinetically inert at room temperature i.e.
ligand dissociation is very slow and the complexes don’t exchange ligands without heating.
Scheme 2: Route for synthesis of hetero-‐complex of Pd. Ultrasound initiates ligand exchange and
product possess two different ligands (NHC and imidazole) coordinated to the same Pd.
Figure 5: GPC traces for polymer samples taken before and after sonication, mixture of Pd(NHC-‐
pTHF18k)2Cl2 and Pd(Im-‐pTHF6k)2Cl2 (left), mixture of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 and Pd(Im-‐pTHF6k)2Cl2
(right).
In order to test this, Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complex (36 kDa or 50 kDa, both above Mlim) and
Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 (12kDa, below Mlim) were mixed in a 1:1 ratio in toluene and sonicated.
After sonicating for 2h, a significant amount of complex had formed with a MW
corresponding to the asymmetric complex (i.e., MWproduct = MWinitialP1/2 + MWinitialP2/2). The
polymer formed after sonication of 12 kDa Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 with Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2
(Figure 5) showed high conversion to product, with only small shoulders of the initial
Chapter 5
94
Figure 4: GPC traces for polymer sample after sonicating the mixture of Pd(Im-‐pTHF30k)2Cl2 and
Pd(Im-‐pTHF6k)2Cl2 for 2h. New polymer was obtained with 35 kDa which corresponds to the MW for
Pd(NHC-‐pTHF30k)(Im-‐pTHF6k)Cl2.
We anticipated that the product distribution could be biased by mechanical initiation of
exchange when the same mixture was sonicated instead of heated. To investigate this, a 1:1
mixture of coordination polymers Pd(Im-‐pTHF30k)2Cl2 and Pd(Im-‐pTHF6k)2Cl2 was sonicated
for 2h. After sonication the GPC trace revealed a single peak at 35 kDa with small shoulders
corresponding to initial polymers.
After ligand exchange, the metal center is not located in the middle of the polymer chain.
Since the solvodynamic force reaches a maximum value at the center due to the
centrosymmetric nature of the flow field with respect to the molecule,11,13,14 the product is
not responsive to the mechanical stress although its MW is above the Mlim to break Pd-‐
imidazole bond.
Mechanochemical synthesis of hetero-‐complexes
In order to investigate the directed mechanochemical formation of hetero-‐complexes two
structurally different ligands coordinated in the same metal center, Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and
Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2, were mixed. Both complexes are kinetically inert at room temperature i.e.
ligand dissociation is very slow and the complexes don’t exchange ligands without heating.
Scheme 2: Route for synthesis of hetero-‐complex of Pd. Ultrasound initiates ligand exchange and
product possess two different ligands (NHC and imidazole) coordinated to the same Pd.
Figure 5: GPC traces for polymer samples taken before and after sonication, mixture of Pd(NHC-‐
pTHF18k)2Cl2 and Pd(Im-‐pTHF6k)2Cl2 (left), mixture of Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2 and Pd(Im-‐pTHF6k)2Cl2
(right).
In order to test this, Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complex (36 kDa or 50 kDa, both above Mlim) and
Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 (12kDa, below Mlim) were mixed in a 1:1 ratio in toluene and sonicated.
After sonicating for 2h, a significant amount of complex had formed with a MW
corresponding to the asymmetric complex (i.e., MWproduct = MWinitialP1/2 + MWinitialP2/2). The
polymer formed after sonication of 12 kDa Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 with Pd(NHC-‐pTHF25k)2Cl2
(Figure 5) showed high conversion to product, with only small shoulders of the initial
Mechanochemically induced, directed ligand exchange
95
5
polymers. When Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 was used, shoulders were higher in intensity after
sonicating for 2h indicating that the conversion was lower. Product distribution in both
experiments unequivocally shows that hetero-‐complex formation is a directed,
mechanochemical process rather than a thermal process, which would lead to a statistical
mixture of symmetric starting material and asymmetric complexes.
As a control experiment, Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 was sonicated in the presence of acetonitrile
and acetic acid to trap scission products. This resulted in products with MW around 18 kDa,
with a peak in GPC that is clearly distinguishable from the product peak when a mixture of
Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 and Pd(Im-‐pTHF6k)2Cl2 was sonicated (Figure 6).
Figure 6: Comparison of the GPC traces for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 before and after sonication in the
presence of Pd(Im-‐pTHF6k)2Cl2 or the trapping agents acetonitrile and acetic acid.
Mechanochemical synthesis of block copolymers
In order to investigate the mechanochemical synthesis of block copolymers, pyridine-‐
capped poly methyl acrylate based polymeric ligand (PyPMA, Scheme 3) was synthesized via
SET-‐LRP of methyl acrylate15 using 4-‐pyridinyl-‐2-‐bromoisobutyrate as the initiator.
Combining PyPMA with 0.5 equiv of Pd(CH3CN)2Cl2 in DCM at room temperature for 2 h
resulted in a doubling of MW, as determined by GPC, that was consistent with the
displacement of thermally labile CH3CN by pyridine-‐based ligands.
Scheme 3: Synthesis of PyPMA ligand and Pd(PyPMA)2Cl2 i) 2-‐bromo-‐isobutyrylbromide, CH2Cl2, 0oC-‐
25oC, ii) MA, Me6TREN, Cu wire, RT, iii) Pd(CH3CN)2Cl2, CH2Cl2, RT.
Pd(PyPMA-‐45k)2Cl2 complex (90 kDa) and Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 (10 kDa, below Mlim) were mixed
in a 1:1 ratio in toluene. GPC traces for polymers before mixing revealed monomodal
distribution. A new peak corresponding to a MW of 50 kDa appeared upon mixing that
suggests a ligand swapping between species without sonication. However, concentrations of
different species did not change during 2 h at room temperature (Figure 7) indicating that
equilibrium was achieved immediately. After sonicating the same mixture for 2 h, a
significant amount of complex had formed (Figure 8) with a MW corresponding to the
asymmetric complex (50 kDa) that consists of two different ligands (pyridine and imidazole)
and two different polymers (PTHF and PMA). Comparing the GPC traces of hetero-‐complex
that contains block copolymer and a partially dissociated complex showed that the
molecular weight of hetero-‐complex is indeed significantly higher than the dissociation
product of Pd(PyPMA)2Cl2 (Figure 8).
Chapter 5
96
polymers. When Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 was used, shoulders were higher in intensity after
sonicating for 2h indicating that the conversion was lower. Product distribution in both
experiments unequivocally shows that hetero-‐complex formation is a directed,
mechanochemical process rather than a thermal process, which would lead to a statistical
mixture of symmetric starting material and asymmetric complexes.
As a control experiment, Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 was sonicated in the presence of acetonitrile
and acetic acid to trap scission products. This resulted in products with MW around 18 kDa,
with a peak in GPC that is clearly distinguishable from the product peak when a mixture of
Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 and Pd(Im-‐pTHF6k)2Cl2 was sonicated (Figure 6).
Figure 6: Comparison of the GPC traces for Pd(NHC-‐pTHF18k)2Cl2 before and after sonication in the
presence of Pd(Im-‐pTHF6k)2Cl2 or the trapping agents acetonitrile and acetic acid.
Mechanochemical synthesis of block copolymers
In order to investigate the mechanochemical synthesis of block copolymers, pyridine-‐
capped poly methyl acrylate based polymeric ligand (PyPMA, Scheme 3) was synthesized via
SET-‐LRP of methyl acrylate15 using 4-‐pyridinyl-‐2-‐bromoisobutyrate as the initiator.
Combining PyPMA with 0.5 equiv of Pd(CH3CN)2Cl2 in DCM at room temperature for 2 h
resulted in a doubling of MW, as determined by GPC, that was consistent with the
displacement of thermally labile CH3CN by pyridine-‐based ligands.
Scheme 3: Synthesis of PyPMA ligand and Pd(PyPMA)2Cl2 i) 2-‐bromo-‐isobutyrylbromide, CH2Cl2, 0oC-‐
25oC, ii) MA, Me6TREN, Cu wire, RT, iii) Pd(CH3CN)2Cl2, CH2Cl2, RT.
Pd(PyPMA-‐45k)2Cl2 complex (90 kDa) and Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 (10 kDa, below Mlim) were mixed
in a 1:1 ratio in toluene. GPC traces for polymers before mixing revealed monomodal
distribution. A new peak corresponding to a MW of 50 kDa appeared upon mixing that
suggests a ligand swapping between species without sonication. However, concentrations of
different species did not change during 2 h at room temperature (Figure 7) indicating that
equilibrium was achieved immediately. After sonicating the same mixture for 2 h, a
significant amount of complex had formed (Figure 8) with a MW corresponding to the
asymmetric complex (50 kDa) that consists of two different ligands (pyridine and imidazole)
and two different polymers (PTHF and PMA). Comparing the GPC traces of hetero-‐complex
that contains block copolymer and a partially dissociated complex showed that the
molecular weight of hetero-‐complex is indeed significantly higher than the dissociation
product of Pd(PyPMA)2Cl2 (Figure 8).
Mechanochemically induced, directed ligand exchange
97
5
Figure 7: GPC traces for the mixture of Pd(PyPMA-‐45k)2Cl2 complex (90 kDa) and Pd(Im-‐pTHF6k)2Cl2
showed that the mixture is in equilibrium and concentration of different species did not change after
120 min.
As a control experiment, Pd(PyPMA-‐45k)2Cl2 was sonicated and scission products were
trapped with CH3CN and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). Mid-‐chain scission yields polymers with
MW around 45 kDa. Comparing the GPC traces of hetero-‐complex that contains block
copolymer and a partially dissociated complex showed that the molecular weight of hetero-‐
complex is indeed significantly higher than the dissociation product of Pd(PyPMA)2Cl2 thus,
the new species is the hetero-‐complex rather than the fragments of Pd(PyPMA-‐45k)2Cl2.
(Figure 8).
Figure 8: GPC traces for the different species: a) Pd(PyPMA-‐45k)2Cl2 (black), PyPMA-‐45k (red), and
partially dissociated complex (blue). b) Mixture of Pd(PyPMA-‐45k)2Cl2 and Pd(Im-‐pTHF6k)2Cl2 after
sonicating for 120 min (red). Dashed line corresponds to the GPC trace for partially dissociated
complex Pd(PyPMA-‐45k)2Cl2.
Conclusions
In Chapters 2 and 4, ultrasonic scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes
was analyzed in detail. In the current chapter, the information on ligand exchange kinetics,
limiting molecular weights and scission rates has been used to synthesize hetero-‐complexes.
Mechano-‐chemically induced hetero-‐complex formation is slower than mechanochemical
bond scission of Pd(NHC)2Cl2 complexes in the presence of trapping agents. After sonicating
the mixture for 2h, significant amounts of starting polymers were still present. An
explanation is that the formation of triscoordinated complexes, which are the intermediates
in the formation of heterocomplexes, is slow compared to trapping, while the concentration
of the second polymer is also lower than the trapping agents.
Results presented in this chapter show that mechanochemically induced block
copolymerization is possible by attaching desired polymers on easily modified ligands.
Chapter 5
98
Figure 7: GPC traces for the mixture of Pd(PyPMA-‐45k)2Cl2 complex (90 kDa) and Pd(Im-‐pTHF6k)2Cl2
showed that the mixture is in equilibrium and concentration of different species did not change after
120 min.
As a control experiment, Pd(PyPMA-‐45k)2Cl2 was sonicated and scission products were
trapped with CH3CN and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). Mid-‐chain scission yields polymers with
MW around 45 kDa. Comparing the GPC traces of hetero-‐complex that contains block
copolymer and a partially dissociated complex showed that the molecular weight of hetero-‐
complex is indeed significantly higher than the dissociation product of Pd(PyPMA)2Cl2 thus,
the new species is the hetero-‐complex rather than the fragments of Pd(PyPMA-‐45k)2Cl2.
(Figure 8).
Figure 8: GPC traces for the different species: a) Pd(PyPMA-‐45k)2Cl2 (black), PyPMA-‐45k (red), and
partially dissociated complex (blue). b) Mixture of Pd(PyPMA-‐45k)2Cl2 and Pd(Im-‐pTHF6k)2Cl2 after
sonicating for 120 min (red). Dashed line corresponds to the GPC trace for partially dissociated
complex Pd(PyPMA-‐45k)2Cl2.
Conclusions
In Chapters 2 and 4, ultrasonic scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 complexes
was analyzed in detail. In the current chapter, the information on ligand exchange kinetics,
limiting molecular weights and scission rates has been used to synthesize hetero-‐complexes.
Mechano-‐chemically induced hetero-‐complex formation is slower than mechanochemical
bond scission of Pd(NHC)2Cl2 complexes in the presence of trapping agents. After sonicating
the mixture for 2h, significant amounts of starting polymers were still present. An
explanation is that the formation of triscoordinated complexes, which are the intermediates
in the formation of heterocomplexes, is slow compared to trapping, while the concentration
of the second polymer is also lower than the trapping agents.
Results presented in this chapter show that mechanochemically induced block
copolymerization is possible by attaching desired polymers on easily modified ligands.
Mechanochemically induced, directed ligand exchange
99
5
Experimental
General
All chemicals were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification unless
specified otherwise. Toluene was dried over 4A molecular sieves. Gel permeation chromatography
(GPC) was performed on a Shimadzu LC10-‐AD, using Polymer Laboratories PL Gel 5μm MIXED-‐C and
MIXEDD columns (linear range of MW: 200–2000000 g/mol), a Shimadzu SPD-‐M10A UV-‐vis detector
at 254 nm and RID-‐10A refractive index detector, and THF as eluent at a flow rate of 1 mL/min (20
°C). Polystyrene standards were used for calibration. Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 were
synthesized according to procedures presented in Chapter 2 and Chapter 4 respectively.
Sonication experiments
A homemade, double-‐jacketed glass reactor with a volume of 10 mL was used in the sonication
experiments. A Sonics and Materials 20 kHz, 0.5 in. diameter titanium alloy ultrasound probe with
half wave extension (parts 630-‐0220 and 630-‐0410) was operated using a Sonics and Materials
VC750 power supply. The temperature in the reactor was maintained with a Lauda E300 cooling
bath and measured using a 0.5 mm diameter thermocouple. 5 ml solutions were sonicated
continuously; temperature of the solution was kept constant by circulating water at 2oC. Prior to
sonication CH4 was bubbled through solution via teflon tubing. Aliquots of 100 µL were taken after
2h. Toluene was removed under reduced pressure; residues were dissolved in THF and submitted to
GPC.
Synthesis of 4-‐pyridinyl-‐2-‐bromo-‐isobutyrate (PyI)
To a solution of 4-‐hydroxypyridine (1.00 g, 10.5 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (dry, 15 mL), 2-‐bromo-‐
isobutyrylbromide (1.43 mL, 11.6 mmol) was added drop-‐wise at 0 °C. The resulting suspension was
allowed to warm to ambient temperature and then stirred overnight under argon. The reaction was
then diluted with CH2Cl2 (30 mL), washed with saturated NaHCO3 (3 × 50 mL) and water (3 × 50 mL),
dried over MgSO4 and then passed through a short column of neutral alumina (CH2Cl2). The solvent
was removed under reduced pressure to afford the desired product (2.18 g, 8.94 mmol) as a clear,
viscous liquid in 85% yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.64 (d, 3J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 7.14 (d, 3J = 6.8 Hz,
2H), 2.04 (s, 6H).
Synthesis of PyPMA
25 mL Schlenk flask was charged with methyl acrylate (MA) (4.0 mL, 44 mmol), 10 mM solution of
tris(2-‐[dimethyl]-‐aminoethyl)amine (Me6TREN, 4.0 mL, 40 μmol) in DMSO and 4-‐pyridinyl-‐2-‐bromo-‐
isobutyrate (1) (15.5 mg, 64 μmol). Solution was degassed by freeze-‐pump-‐thaw cycle (3 times). A
magnetic stir-‐bar wrapped with copper wire, and inserted into the solution. The solution was stirred
at ambient temperature for 1 h. Polymerization was terminated by THF (10 ml, stabilized by BHT).
The resulting deep blue solution was then added slowly to excess methanol (150 mL), which caused
a polymeric material to precipitate as a gummy solid. Centrifugation was performed to sediment out
the polymer and the supernatant was decanted. The residue was then washed with methanol (5 ×
20 mL) and dried under reduced pressure to afford the desired polymer. GPC (THF) Mn = 50 kDa,
MALDI-‐TOF: 45 kDA. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 400 MHz): δ 8.73 (d, 3J = 8 Hz), 7.80 (d, 3J =8 Hz), 3.51 (br), 2.30
(br), 1.91 (br), 1.68 (br), 1.45 (br)
Synthesis of Pd(PyPMA)2Cl2
PyPMA (400 mg, 8.90 μmol )was mixed with Pd(CH3CN)2Cl2 (1.15 mg, 4.45 μmol) in DCM and stirred
at room temperature for 2 h under argon. Resulting light yellow solution was filtered over filter
paper and solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 400 MHz): δ 8.80 (d, 3J
= 8 Hz), 7.23 (d, 3J =8 Hz), 3.51 (br), 2.30 (br), 1.91 (br), 1.68 (br), 1.45 (br)
Chapter 5
100
Experimental
General
All chemicals were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification unless
specified otherwise. Toluene was dried over 4A molecular sieves. Gel permeation chromatography
(GPC) was performed on a Shimadzu LC10-‐AD, using Polymer Laboratories PL Gel 5μm MIXED-‐C and
MIXEDD columns (linear range of MW: 200–2000000 g/mol), a Shimadzu SPD-‐M10A UV-‐vis detector
at 254 nm and RID-‐10A refractive index detector, and THF as eluent at a flow rate of 1 mL/min (20
°C). Polystyrene standards were used for calibration. Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 were
synthesized according to procedures presented in Chapter 2 and Chapter 4 respectively.
Sonication experiments
A homemade, double-‐jacketed glass reactor with a volume of 10 mL was used in the sonication
experiments. A Sonics and Materials 20 kHz, 0.5 in. diameter titanium alloy ultrasound probe with
half wave extension (parts 630-‐0220 and 630-‐0410) was operated using a Sonics and Materials
VC750 power supply. The temperature in the reactor was maintained with a Lauda E300 cooling
bath and measured using a 0.5 mm diameter thermocouple. 5 ml solutions were sonicated
continuously; temperature of the solution was kept constant by circulating water at 2oC. Prior to
sonication CH4 was bubbled through solution via teflon tubing. Aliquots of 100 µL were taken after
2h. Toluene was removed under reduced pressure; residues were dissolved in THF and submitted to
GPC.
Synthesis of 4-‐pyridinyl-‐2-‐bromo-‐isobutyrate (PyI)
To a solution of 4-‐hydroxypyridine (1.00 g, 10.5 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (dry, 15 mL), 2-‐bromo-‐
isobutyrylbromide (1.43 mL, 11.6 mmol) was added drop-‐wise at 0 °C. The resulting suspension was
allowed to warm to ambient temperature and then stirred overnight under argon. The reaction was
then diluted with CH2Cl2 (30 mL), washed with saturated NaHCO3 (3 × 50 mL) and water (3 × 50 mL),
dried over MgSO4 and then passed through a short column of neutral alumina (CH2Cl2). The solvent
was removed under reduced pressure to afford the desired product (2.18 g, 8.94 mmol) as a clear,
viscous liquid in 85% yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 8.64 (d, 3J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 7.14 (d, 3J = 6.8 Hz,
2H), 2.04 (s, 6H).
Synthesis of PyPMA
25 mL Schlenk flask was charged with methyl acrylate (MA) (4.0 mL, 44 mmol), 10 mM solution of
tris(2-‐[dimethyl]-‐aminoethyl)amine (Me6TREN, 4.0 mL, 40 μmol) in DMSO and 4-‐pyridinyl-‐2-‐bromo-‐
isobutyrate (1) (15.5 mg, 64 μmol). Solution was degassed by freeze-‐pump-‐thaw cycle (3 times). A
magnetic stir-‐bar wrapped with copper wire, and inserted into the solution. The solution was stirred
at ambient temperature for 1 h. Polymerization was terminated by THF (10 ml, stabilized by BHT).
The resulting deep blue solution was then added slowly to excess methanol (150 mL), which caused
a polymeric material to precipitate as a gummy solid. Centrifugation was performed to sediment out
the polymer and the supernatant was decanted. The residue was then washed with methanol (5 ×
20 mL) and dried under reduced pressure to afford the desired polymer. GPC (THF) Mn = 50 kDa,
MALDI-‐TOF: 45 kDA. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 400 MHz): δ 8.73 (d, 3J = 8 Hz), 7.80 (d, 3J =8 Hz), 3.51 (br), 2.30
(br), 1.91 (br), 1.68 (br), 1.45 (br)
Synthesis of Pd(PyPMA)2Cl2
PyPMA (400 mg, 8.90 μmol )was mixed with Pd(CH3CN)2Cl2 (1.15 mg, 4.45 μmol) in DCM and stirred
at room temperature for 2 h under argon. Resulting light yellow solution was filtered over filter
paper and solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 400 MHz): δ 8.80 (d, 3J
= 8 Hz), 7.23 (d, 3J =8 Hz), 3.51 (br), 2.30 (br), 1.91 (br), 1.68 (br), 1.45 (br)
Mechanochemically induced, directed ligand exchange
101
5
References
(1) Piermattei, A.; Karthikeyan, S.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1 (2), 133–137.
(2) Chen, Y.; Spiering, A. J. H.; Karthikeyan, S.; Peters, G. W. M.; Meijer, E. W.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat.
Chem. 2012, 4 (7), 559–562.
(3) Larsen, M. B.; Boydston, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135 (22), 8189–8192.
(4) Sottos, N. R. Nat. Chem. 2014, 6 (5), 381–383.
(5) Diesendruck, C. E.; Steinberg, B. D.; Sugai, N.; Silberstein, M. N.; Sottos, N. R.; White, S. R.;
Braun, P. V.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134 (30), 12446–12449.
(6) Vermonden, T.; van Steenbergen, M. J.; Besseling, N. A. M.; Marcelis, A. T. M.; Hennink, W. E.;
Sudhölter, E. J. R.; Cohen Stuart, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (48), 15802–15808.
(7) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2006, 44 (19), 5445–5453.
(8) Groote, R.; van Haandel, L.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2012, 50 (23),
4929–4935.
(9) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Chem. Commun. 2008, No. 37, 4416–4418.
(10) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Angew. Chem.-‐Int. Ed. 2004, 43 (34), 4460–4462.
(11) Nakano, A.; Minoura, Y. Macromolecules 1975, 8 (5), 677–680.
(12) Ribas-‐Arino, J.; Shiga, M.; Marx, D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48 (23), 4190–4193.
(13) Odell, J. A.; Keller, A. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 1986, 24 (9), 1889–1916.
(14) Odell, J. A.; Muller, A. J.; Narh, K. A.; Keller, A. Macromolecules 1990, 23 (12), 3092–3103.
(15) Percec, V.; Guliashvili, T.; Ladislaw, J. S.; Wistrand, A.; Stjerndahl, A.; Sienkowska, M. J.;
Monteiro, M. J.; Sahoo, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128 (43), 14156–14165.
Chapter 5
102
Chapter 6Transition metal bearing supramolecular polymer networks: Towards self-healing applications
Synthesis of polymethyl acrylate (PMA) with 5% imidazole (VIm) groups and initial attempts
to prepare self-healing p(MA-co-VIm)-metal films are reported. Pendant VIm serves as a
ligand that leads to reversible cross-linking upon complexation to metal salts such as Copper
and Palladium.
References
(1) Piermattei, A.; Karthikeyan, S.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1 (2), 133–137.
(2) Chen, Y.; Spiering, A. J. H.; Karthikeyan, S.; Peters, G. W. M.; Meijer, E. W.; Sijbesma, R. P. Nat.
Chem. 2012, 4 (7), 559–562.
(3) Larsen, M. B.; Boydston, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135 (22), 8189–8192.
(4) Sottos, N. R. Nat. Chem. 2014, 6 (5), 381–383.
(5) Diesendruck, C. E.; Steinberg, B. D.; Sugai, N.; Silberstein, M. N.; Sottos, N. R.; White, S. R.;
Braun, P. V.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134 (30), 12446–12449.
(6) Vermonden, T.; van Steenbergen, M. J.; Besseling, N. A. M.; Marcelis, A. T. M.; Hennink, W. E.;
Sudhölter, E. J. R.; Cohen Stuart, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (48), 15802–15808.
(7) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2006, 44 (19), 5445–5453.
(8) Groote, R.; van Haandel, L.; Sijbesma, R. P. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Chem. 2012, 50 (23),
4929–4935.
(9) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Chem. Commun. 2008, No. 37, 4416–4418.
(10) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Angew. Chem.-‐Int. Ed. 2004, 43 (34), 4460–4462.
(11) Nakano, A.; Minoura, Y. Macromolecules 1975, 8 (5), 677–680.
(12) Ribas-‐Arino, J.; Shiga, M.; Marx, D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48 (23), 4190–4193.
(13) Odell, J. A.; Keller, A. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 1986, 24 (9), 1889–1916.
(14) Odell, J. A.; Muller, A. J.; Narh, K. A.; Keller, A. Macromolecules 1990, 23 (12), 3092–3103.
(15) Percec, V.; Guliashvili, T.; Ladislaw, J. S.; Wistrand, A.; Stjerndahl, A.; Sienkowska, M. J.;
Monteiro, M. J.; Sahoo, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128 (43), 14156–14165.
Introduction
Supramolecular polymer networks are three-‐dimensional assemblies of macromolecules
connected by non-‐covalent bonds.1 These networks form a useful class of materials with the
potential utility caused by the reversibility of their constituent supramolecular bonds.2 Such
bonds formed through hydrogen bonding or transition metal complexation are quite strong
but under stress they are broken more easily than covalent bonds.3–5 Their reversibility
renders supramolecular polymer networks useful for applications as self-‐healing scaffolds,
or in shape-‐memory materials.6,7
Up to date, self-‐healing materials have been developed using various reversible bonds such
as Diels-‐Alder adducts,8 hydrogen bonding,9,10 ionic interactions,11 π-‐π interactions,12 or
host-‐guest interactions.13 In addition, reversible coordination bonds have been used to
obtain self-‐healing materials since metal-‐ligand interaction is less sensitive to moisture
compared to hydrogen bonds. For the application of metallo-‐supramolecular polymers in
self-‐healing materials, mostly nitrogen-‐based aromatic ligands were used (Figure 1). Metal-‐
ligand bond in these materials was either used for chain extension or as a cross-‐linker. 5,14–23
We have shown previously that bisimidazole-‐Pd complexes do not show any significant
ligand exchange between two different Pd centers at room temperature. However, excess
free imidazole, which is formed when Im-‐Pd bonds break under stress, initiates a ligand
exchange reaction and replaces one of the imidazoles coordinated to Pd via an associative
mechanism. We anticipated that polymer films, which possess such Im-‐metal coordination
as cross-‐linker, would be ideal candidates for autonomous self-‐healing materials. High
association affinity between imidazole and transition metals would make the material
strong while promoting a fast healing for a broken or partially deformed sample. In this
chapter, synthesis of polymethyl acrylate (PMA) with pendant imidazole (VIm) groups which
serve as the cross-‐linking sites, and preliminary results for self-‐healing property of p(MA-‐co-‐
VIm)-‐Metal films are reported.
Figure 1: Examples from recent literature for polymeric ligands and metals investigated in self-‐
healing metallosupramolecular polymers.5, 14-‐23
ON
NN
NN
O N
NN
NN
x yn
NH
NH
O O NH
NH
O NH
O O O O O
NH
O O NH
NH
O O O1 2 1 4 1 3 1
O4
1 OCNNCO
2N O NO₂
OHHO
3
4
NNN N N N
NHO
OH
HOO
H
NN N
OO ORn m
n m
/Zn²⁺/or/La³⁺ /Fe²⁺/or/Cd²⁺
/Zn²⁺/or/Eu³⁺
O O
OOO
O
/Fe²⁺
a) b) c)
d)
NR₂
NR₂R₂N
R₂N
NNN NO O
NH
R₂N
R₂N
NNO
O
HN
O
NR₂
NR₂
N NO
e)
/Pd²⁺/or/Pt²⁺
Chapter 6
104
Introduction
Supramolecular polymer networks are three-‐dimensional assemblies of macromolecules
connected by non-‐covalent bonds.1 These networks form a useful class of materials with the
potential utility caused by the reversibility of their constituent supramolecular bonds.2 Such
bonds formed through hydrogen bonding or transition metal complexation are quite strong
but under stress they are broken more easily than covalent bonds.3–5 Their reversibility
renders supramolecular polymer networks useful for applications as self-‐healing scaffolds,
or in shape-‐memory materials.6,7
Up to date, self-‐healing materials have been developed using various reversible bonds such
as Diels-‐Alder adducts,8 hydrogen bonding,9,10 ionic interactions,11 π-‐π interactions,12 or
host-‐guest interactions.13 In addition, reversible coordination bonds have been used to
obtain self-‐healing materials since metal-‐ligand interaction is less sensitive to moisture
compared to hydrogen bonds. For the application of metallo-‐supramolecular polymers in
self-‐healing materials, mostly nitrogen-‐based aromatic ligands were used (Figure 1). Metal-‐
ligand bond in these materials was either used for chain extension or as a cross-‐linker. 5,14–23
We have shown previously that bisimidazole-‐Pd complexes do not show any significant
ligand exchange between two different Pd centers at room temperature. However, excess
free imidazole, which is formed when Im-‐Pd bonds break under stress, initiates a ligand
exchange reaction and replaces one of the imidazoles coordinated to Pd via an associative
mechanism. We anticipated that polymer films, which possess such Im-‐metal coordination
as cross-‐linker, would be ideal candidates for autonomous self-‐healing materials. High
association affinity between imidazole and transition metals would make the material
strong while promoting a fast healing for a broken or partially deformed sample. In this
chapter, synthesis of polymethyl acrylate (PMA) with pendant imidazole (VIm) groups which
serve as the cross-‐linking sites, and preliminary results for self-‐healing property of p(MA-‐co-‐
VIm)-‐Metal films are reported.
Figure 1: Examples from recent literature for polymeric ligands and metals investigated in self-‐
healing metallosupramolecular polymers.5, 14-‐23
ON
NN
NN
O N
NN
NN
x yn
NH
NH
O O NH
NH
O NH
O O O O O
NH
O O NH
NH
O O O1 2 1 4 1 3 1
O4
1 OCNNCO
2N O NO₂
OHHO
3
4
NNN N N N
NHO
OH
HOO
H
NN N
OO ORn m
n m
/Zn²⁺/or/La³⁺ /Fe²⁺/or/Cd²⁺
/Zn²⁺/or/Eu³⁺
O O
OOO
O
/Fe²⁺
a) b) c)
d)
NR₂
NR₂R₂N
R₂N
NNN NO O
NH
R₂N
R₂N
NNO
O
HN
O
NR₂
NR₂
N NO
e)
/Pd²⁺/or/Pt²⁺
Supramolecular polymer networks
105
6
Results and discussions
Scheme 1: Synthesis of copolymer poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm).
In order to obtain a cross-‐linked coordination network, methyl acrylate was copolymerized
with N-‐vinyl imidazole (Scheme 1) via Cu catalyzed single electron transfer living radical
polymerization (SET-‐LRP).24 The mechanism of SET-‐LRP is well established and it results in
low polydispersity polymers with predefined molecular weights. Copolymer was synthesized
with an initial monomer feed ratio in solution for VIm: MA of 5:95. The fraction of VIm in
the final polymer was determined with 1H NMR, using methyl peaks of initiator (ethyl 2-‐
bromo-‐2-‐methylpropanoate) as internal reference (Figure 2). The poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm) had ~4%
VIm units, indicating similar reactivity ratios for monomers.25 Molecular weight of the
copolymer was determined as Mn = 25 kDa by 1H NMR and confirmed by MALDI (Figure 3) to
give an average of n imidazole units per polymer chain. The molecular weight of the
polymer is also consistent with the results previously reported the homo-‐ polymerizations of
MA by SET-‐LRP. This shows that the presence of VIm does not inhibit or slow down the SET-‐
LRP.
O
OBr
O
O+ +O
N
NOO
Ox
Cu)wireDMSO
RTN
N
1 2 3
y n∗
Figure 2: 1H NMR spectrum of poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm) in CDCl3
Figure 3: MALDI-‐TOF spectrum of poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm)
A 3.7 mM solution of copolymer poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm) in MeCN was mixed with either
PdCl2(CH3CN)2 or Cu(CH3CN)4PF6 dissolved in CH2Cl2. Upon mixing, a gel was formed in both
cases, as depicted in Figure 4 for the Pd complex.
Chapter 6
106
Results and discussions
Scheme 1: Synthesis of copolymer poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm).
In order to obtain a cross-‐linked coordination network, methyl acrylate was copolymerized
with N-‐vinyl imidazole (Scheme 1) via Cu catalyzed single electron transfer living radical
polymerization (SET-‐LRP).24 The mechanism of SET-‐LRP is well established and it results in
low polydispersity polymers with predefined molecular weights. Copolymer was synthesized
with an initial monomer feed ratio in solution for VIm: MA of 5:95. The fraction of VIm in
the final polymer was determined with 1H NMR, using methyl peaks of initiator (ethyl 2-‐
bromo-‐2-‐methylpropanoate) as internal reference (Figure 2). The poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm) had ~4%
VIm units, indicating similar reactivity ratios for monomers.25 Molecular weight of the
copolymer was determined as Mn = 25 kDa by 1H NMR and confirmed by MALDI (Figure 3) to
give an average of n imidazole units per polymer chain. The molecular weight of the
polymer is also consistent with the results previously reported the homo-‐ polymerizations of
MA by SET-‐LRP. This shows that the presence of VIm does not inhibit or slow down the SET-‐
LRP.
O
OBr
O
O+ +O
N
NOO
Ox
Cu)wireDMSO
RTN
N
1 2 3
y n∗
Figure 2: 1H NMR spectrum of poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm) in CDCl3
Figure 3: MALDI-‐TOF spectrum of poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm)
A 3.7 mM solution of copolymer poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm) in MeCN was mixed with either
PdCl2(CH3CN)2 or Cu(CH3CN)4PF6 dissolved in CH2Cl2. Upon mixing, a gel was formed in both
cases, as depicted in Figure 4 for the Pd complex.
Supramolecular polymer networks
107
6
Figure 4: Supramolecular gel formed upon addition of PdCl2(MeCN)2 in MeCN
Figure 5: Polymer films prepared from the gels by evaporating solvent a) poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm)-‐PdCl2 and
b) poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm)-‐CuPF6
Polymer films (Figure 5) were prepared from the gels by slowly evaporating solvents on a
Teflon mold. Dumbbell shaped polymer films were subjected to tensile testing at a strain
rate of 10-‐3 s-‐1. The Pd containing polymer has a Young’s modulus of 2 MPa that is higher
than that of Cu containing polymer (0.25 MPa). This may be attributed to the higher binding
affinity of Pd for imidazole. The force induced bond scission has been already shown to take
place on the weakest bond.3 Therefore; the strength of the metal ligand coordination bond
determines the mechanical properties for the film.
Figure 6: Tensile tests for poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm)-‐PdCl2 and poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm)-‐CuPF6 before and after
breaking the polymer films.
Polymer films were tested for their self-‐healing properties at room temperature. Broken
pieces were brought in contact for 2 h right after rupture (<5 mins). In the time scale of the
experiment, Pd bearing polymer film did not heal significantly whereas Cu containing
polymer recovered approximately half of its initial tensile strength (Figure 6).
Conclusions
A copolymer of methyl acrylate (MA) with ~4% vinylimidazole (VIm) groups was synthesized.
The Imidazole pendant groups in the polymer serve as metal coordination sites and give rise
to gelation when Pd(II) or Cu(I) salts are added in solution. Freestanding films were prepared
with these metallo-‐supramolecular polymers. Metal-‐ligand bonds in these polymer films
break upon crack formation and yield free ligand and coordinatively unsaturated metal
center. These reactive groups may initiate the self-‐healing property once surfaces are
brought in contact. Healing efficiency of these polymers can be increased with fine-‐tuning of
the ligand metal ratios or healing time and temperatures.
Chapter 6
108
Figure 4: Supramolecular gel formed upon addition of PdCl2(MeCN)2 in MeCN
Figure 5: Polymer films prepared from the gels by evaporating solvent a) poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm)-‐PdCl2 and
b) poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm)-‐CuPF6
Polymer films (Figure 5) were prepared from the gels by slowly evaporating solvents on a
Teflon mold. Dumbbell shaped polymer films were subjected to tensile testing at a strain
rate of 10-‐3 s-‐1. The Pd containing polymer has a Young’s modulus of 2 MPa that is higher
than that of Cu containing polymer (0.25 MPa). This may be attributed to the higher binding
affinity of Pd for imidazole. The force induced bond scission has been already shown to take
place on the weakest bond.3 Therefore; the strength of the metal ligand coordination bond
determines the mechanical properties for the film.
Figure 6: Tensile tests for poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm)-‐PdCl2 and poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm)-‐CuPF6 before and after
breaking the polymer films.
Polymer films were tested for their self-‐healing properties at room temperature. Broken
pieces were brought in contact for 2 h right after rupture (<5 mins). In the time scale of the
experiment, Pd bearing polymer film did not heal significantly whereas Cu containing
polymer recovered approximately half of its initial tensile strength (Figure 6).
Conclusions
A copolymer of methyl acrylate (MA) with ~4% vinylimidazole (VIm) groups was synthesized.
The Imidazole pendant groups in the polymer serve as metal coordination sites and give rise
to gelation when Pd(II) or Cu(I) salts are added in solution. Freestanding films were prepared
with these metallo-‐supramolecular polymers. Metal-‐ligand bonds in these polymer films
break upon crack formation and yield free ligand and coordinatively unsaturated metal
center. These reactive groups may initiate the self-‐healing property once surfaces are
brought in contact. Healing efficiency of these polymers can be increased with fine-‐tuning of
the ligand metal ratios or healing time and temperatures.
Supramolecular polymer networks
109
6
Experimental
General
Dry tetrahydrofuran (THF, HPLC grade) was degassed with argon and purified by passage through
activated alumina solvent column. DMSO was dried over 4Å molecular sieves for at least 12h prior to
use. A Varian 400MR or a Varian Mercury 400 spectrometer was used to record 1H NMR (400 MHz).
Chemical shifts are reported in ppm and referenced to tetramethylsilane or solvent. Methyl acrylate
and N-‐vinyl imidazole were purchased from commercial sources and filtered through neutral
Alumina before polymerizations.
Synthesis of poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm):
Initiator (180 mg, 0.10 mmol), Me6TREN (46.5 mg, 0.20 mmol), methyl acrylate (5.0 mL) and N-‐vinyl
imidazole (0.7 ml) were dissolved in DMSO and degassed by three freeze-‐pump-‐thaw cycles, and
purged with Ar prior to polymerization. Me6TREN was weighed into aluminum weigh boat and added
to a Schlenk tube with the boat. Copper wire was wrapped around a magnetic stirring bar and used
as the source of Cu(0) catalyst. The Schlenk tube was stirred at room temperature in a water bath at
25oC for the period of polymerization (30 mins). Upon completion of the reaction, the tube was
opened to air and THF (10 mL) was added to the viscous solution. The reaction was filtered through
a plug of basic alumina using THF to remove Cu(0) particles and added onto stirring MeOH. The
polymer was centrifuged out from the turbid liquid mixture and left under vacuum overnight.
Molecular weight of polymer was determined by MALDI-‐TOF and 1H NMR as 25 kDa.
References
(1) Binder, W. H.; Zirbs, R. In Hydrogen Bonded Polymers; Binder, W., Ed.; Advances in Polymer
Science; Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006; pp 1–78.
(2) Aida, T.; Meijer, E. W.; Stupp, S. I. Science 2012, 335 (6070), 813–817.
(3) Sijbesma, R. P.; Beijer, F. H.; Brunsveld, L.; Folmer, B. J. B.; Hirschberg, J. H. K. K.; Lange, R. F.
M.; Lowe, J. K. L.; Meijer, E. W. Science 1997, 278 (5343), 1601–1604.
(4) Xu, D.; Craig, S. L. Macromolecules 2011, 44 (13), 5465–5472.
(5) Yount, W. C.; Juwarker, H.; Craig, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125 (50), 15302–15303.
(6) Cordier, P.; Tournilhac, F.; Soulié-‐Ziakovic, C.; Leibler, L. Nature 2008, 451 (7181), 977–980.
(7) Murphy, E. B.; Wudl, F. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35 (1–2), 223–251.
(8) Liu, Y.-‐L.; Chuo, T.-‐W. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4 (7), 2194–2205.
(9) Chen, Y.; Kushner, A. M.; Williams, G. A.; Guan, Z. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4 (6), 467–472.
(10) Chen, Y.; Guan, Z. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50 (74), 10868–10870.
(11) Jr, S. J. K.; Ward, T. C.; Oyetunji, Z. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 2007, 14 (5), 391–397.
(12) Burattini, S.; Colquhoun, H. M.; Fox, J. D.; Friedmann, D.; Greenland, B. W.; Harris, P. J. F.;
Hayes, W.; Mackay, M. E.; Rowan, S. J. Chem. Commun. 2009, No. 44, 6717–6719.
(13) Yang, X.; Yu, H.; Wang, L.; Tong, R.; Akram, M.; Chen, Y.; Zhai, X. Soft Matter 2015, 11 (7),
1242–1252.
(14) Burnworth, M.; Tang, L.; Kumpfer, J. R.; Duncan, A. J.; Beyer, F. L.; Fiore, G. L.; Rowan, S. J.;
Weder, C. Nature 2011, 472 (7343), 334–337.
(15) Yuan, J.; Fang, X.; Zhang, L.; Hong, G.; Lin, Y.; Zheng, Q.; Xu, Y.; Ruan, Y.; Weng, W.; Xia, H.;
Chen, G. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22 (23), 11515–11522.
(16) Hong, G.; Zhang, H.; Lin, Y.; Chen, Y.; Xu, Y.; Weng, W.; Xia, H. Macromolecules 2013, 46 (21),
8649–8656.
(17) Bode, S.; Zedler, L.; Schacher, F. H.; Dietzek, B.; Schmitt, M.; Popp, J.; Hager, M. D.; Schubert, U.
S. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25 (11), 1634–1638.
(18) Mozhdehi, D.; Ayala, S.; Cromwell, O. R.; Guan, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (46), 16128–
16131.
(19) Sandmann, B.; Happ, B.; Kupfer, S.; Schacher, F. H.; Hager, M. D.; Schubert, U. S. Macromol.
Rapid Commun. 2015, 36 (7), 604–609.
(20) Harrington, M. J.; Masic, A.; Holten-‐Andersen, N.; Waite, J. H.; Fratzl, P. Science 2010, 328
(5975), 216–220.
(21) Holten-‐Andersen, N.; Harrington, M. J.; Birkedal, H.; Lee, B. P.; Messersmith, P. B.; Lee, K. Y. C.;
Waite, J. H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011, 108 (7), 2651–2655.
Chapter 6
110
Experimental
General
Dry tetrahydrofuran (THF, HPLC grade) was degassed with argon and purified by passage through
activated alumina solvent column. DMSO was dried over 4Å molecular sieves for at least 12h prior to
use. A Varian 400MR or a Varian Mercury 400 spectrometer was used to record 1H NMR (400 MHz).
Chemical shifts are reported in ppm and referenced to tetramethylsilane or solvent. Methyl acrylate
and N-‐vinyl imidazole were purchased from commercial sources and filtered through neutral
Alumina before polymerizations.
Synthesis of poly(MA-‐co-‐VIm):
Initiator (180 mg, 0.10 mmol), Me6TREN (46.5 mg, 0.20 mmol), methyl acrylate (5.0 mL) and N-‐vinyl
imidazole (0.7 ml) were dissolved in DMSO and degassed by three freeze-‐pump-‐thaw cycles, and
purged with Ar prior to polymerization. Me6TREN was weighed into aluminum weigh boat and added
to a Schlenk tube with the boat. Copper wire was wrapped around a magnetic stirring bar and used
as the source of Cu(0) catalyst. The Schlenk tube was stirred at room temperature in a water bath at
25oC for the period of polymerization (30 mins). Upon completion of the reaction, the tube was
opened to air and THF (10 mL) was added to the viscous solution. The reaction was filtered through
a plug of basic alumina using THF to remove Cu(0) particles and added onto stirring MeOH. The
polymer was centrifuged out from the turbid liquid mixture and left under vacuum overnight.
Molecular weight of polymer was determined by MALDI-‐TOF and 1H NMR as 25 kDa.
References
(1) Binder, W. H.; Zirbs, R. In Hydrogen Bonded Polymers; Binder, W., Ed.; Advances in Polymer
Science; Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006; pp 1–78.
(2) Aida, T.; Meijer, E. W.; Stupp, S. I. Science 2012, 335 (6070), 813–817.
(3) Sijbesma, R. P.; Beijer, F. H.; Brunsveld, L.; Folmer, B. J. B.; Hirschberg, J. H. K. K.; Lange, R. F.
M.; Lowe, J. K. L.; Meijer, E. W. Science 1997, 278 (5343), 1601–1604.
(4) Xu, D.; Craig, S. L. Macromolecules 2011, 44 (13), 5465–5472.
(5) Yount, W. C.; Juwarker, H.; Craig, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125 (50), 15302–15303.
(6) Cordier, P.; Tournilhac, F.; Soulié-‐Ziakovic, C.; Leibler, L. Nature 2008, 451 (7181), 977–980.
(7) Murphy, E. B.; Wudl, F. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35 (1–2), 223–251.
(8) Liu, Y.-‐L.; Chuo, T.-‐W. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4 (7), 2194–2205.
(9) Chen, Y.; Kushner, A. M.; Williams, G. A.; Guan, Z. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4 (6), 467–472.
(10) Chen, Y.; Guan, Z. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50 (74), 10868–10870.
(11) Jr, S. J. K.; Ward, T. C.; Oyetunji, Z. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 2007, 14 (5), 391–397.
(12) Burattini, S.; Colquhoun, H. M.; Fox, J. D.; Friedmann, D.; Greenland, B. W.; Harris, P. J. F.;
Hayes, W.; Mackay, M. E.; Rowan, S. J. Chem. Commun. 2009, No. 44, 6717–6719.
(13) Yang, X.; Yu, H.; Wang, L.; Tong, R.; Akram, M.; Chen, Y.; Zhai, X. Soft Matter 2015, 11 (7),
1242–1252.
(14) Burnworth, M.; Tang, L.; Kumpfer, J. R.; Duncan, A. J.; Beyer, F. L.; Fiore, G. L.; Rowan, S. J.;
Weder, C. Nature 2011, 472 (7343), 334–337.
(15) Yuan, J.; Fang, X.; Zhang, L.; Hong, G.; Lin, Y.; Zheng, Q.; Xu, Y.; Ruan, Y.; Weng, W.; Xia, H.;
Chen, G. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22 (23), 11515–11522.
(16) Hong, G.; Zhang, H.; Lin, Y.; Chen, Y.; Xu, Y.; Weng, W.; Xia, H. Macromolecules 2013, 46 (21),
8649–8656.
(17) Bode, S.; Zedler, L.; Schacher, F. H.; Dietzek, B.; Schmitt, M.; Popp, J.; Hager, M. D.; Schubert, U.
S. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25 (11), 1634–1638.
(18) Mozhdehi, D.; Ayala, S.; Cromwell, O. R.; Guan, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (46), 16128–
16131.
(19) Sandmann, B.; Happ, B.; Kupfer, S.; Schacher, F. H.; Hager, M. D.; Schubert, U. S. Macromol.
Rapid Commun. 2015, 36 (7), 604–609.
(20) Harrington, M. J.; Masic, A.; Holten-‐Andersen, N.; Waite, J. H.; Fratzl, P. Science 2010, 328
(5975), 216–220.
(21) Holten-‐Andersen, N.; Harrington, M. J.; Birkedal, H.; Lee, B. P.; Messersmith, P. B.; Lee, K. Y. C.;
Waite, J. H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011, 108 (7), 2651–2655.
Supramolecular polymer networks
111
6
(22) Terech, P.; Yan, M.; Maréchal, M.; Royal, G.; Galvez, J.; Velu, S. K. P. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
2013, 15 (19), 7338–7344.
(23) Kersey, F. R.; Loveless, D. M.; Craig, S. L. J. R. Soc. Interface 2007, 4 (13), 373–380.
(24) Percec, V.; Guliashvili, T.; Ladislaw, J. S.; Wistrand, A.; Stjerndahl, A.; Sienkowska, M. J.;
Monteiro, M. J.; Sahoo, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128 (43), 14156–14165.
(25) Pekel, N.; Rzaev, Z. M. O.; Güven, O. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2004, 205 (8), 1088–1095.
Summary
Mechanochemical Scission of Transition Metal-‐Ligand Bonds in Coordination
Polymers
Mechanical activation of chemical bonds in polymers offers opportunities for a broad range
of uses such as mechanically activated catalytic activity, and the formation of block
copolymers. It has been shown that mechanical work done by an external force lowers the
energy barrier for bond dissociation to such an extent that thermal fluctuations can exceed
this barrier at room temperature. One of the most efficient ways to exert force on a
molecule in solution is sonication. Polymers with sufficient molecular weight undergo chain
scission when they are sonicated in solution due to elongational stresses experienced
around collapsing bubbles. As a consequence of the nature of the stress field, chain scission
occurs preferentially around the chain midpoint.
The main aim of this thesis is to gain a better understanding of the fundamental processes
and mechanisms underlying mechanochemical chain scission in organometallic complexes.
Therefore, the use of mechanical force to break coordination bonds between transition
metals and ligands was investigated.
Ultrasound induced chain scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and Pt(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2, coordination
complexes of PdII and PtII with polytetrahydrofuran functionalized N-‐heterocyclic carbene
(NHC) ligands, was investigated in Chapter 2. Application of force in solution by the use of
ultrasound resulted in selective chain scission at the metal–ligand coordination bond.
Scission in coordination bond is reversible; however, scission products were trapped and
monitored by NMR and GPC. Sonicating a series of polymer complexes with different
molecular weights (MW), it was found that the chain scission rate is directly proportional to
the MW of the polymers with above the limiting molecular weight. Comparing scission of
Palladium and Platinum containing polymers showed the influence of ligand dissociation
energy on mechanochemical response of the coordination polymers. Pd-‐NHC (195 kJ/mol)
and Pt-‐NHC (245 kJ/mol) have limiting MWs as 20 and 22 kDa respectively. The force
required to break the bond, Fmax , was calculated using COGEF method. Two important
Chapter 6
112
(22) Terech, P.; Yan, M.; Maréchal, M.; Royal, G.; Galvez, J.; Velu, S. K. P. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
2013, 15 (19), 7338–7344.
(23) Kersey, F. R.; Loveless, D. M.; Craig, S. L. J. R. Soc. Interface 2007, 4 (13), 373–380.
(24) Percec, V.; Guliashvili, T.; Ladislaw, J. S.; Wistrand, A.; Stjerndahl, A.; Sienkowska, M. J.;
Monteiro, M. J.; Sahoo, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128 (43), 14156–14165.
(25) Pekel, N.; Rzaev, Z. M. O.; Güven, O. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2004, 205 (8), 1088–1095.
Summary
Mechanochemical Scission of Transition Metal-‐Ligand Bonds in Coordination
Polymers
Mechanical activation of chemical bonds in polymers offers opportunities for a broad range
of uses such as mechanically activated catalytic activity, and the formation of block
copolymers. It has been shown that mechanical work done by an external force lowers the
energy barrier for bond dissociation to such an extent that thermal fluctuations can exceed
this barrier at room temperature. One of the most efficient ways to exert force on a
molecule in solution is sonication. Polymers with sufficient molecular weight undergo chain
scission when they are sonicated in solution due to elongational stresses experienced
around collapsing bubbles. As a consequence of the nature of the stress field, chain scission
occurs preferentially around the chain midpoint.
The main aim of this thesis is to gain a better understanding of the fundamental processes
and mechanisms underlying mechanochemical chain scission in organometallic complexes.
Therefore, the use of mechanical force to break coordination bonds between transition
metals and ligands was investigated.
Ultrasound induced chain scission in Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and Pt(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2, coordination
complexes of PdII and PtII with polytetrahydrofuran functionalized N-‐heterocyclic carbene
(NHC) ligands, was investigated in Chapter 2. Application of force in solution by the use of
ultrasound resulted in selective chain scission at the metal–ligand coordination bond.
Scission in coordination bond is reversible; however, scission products were trapped and
monitored by NMR and GPC. Sonicating a series of polymer complexes with different
molecular weights (MW), it was found that the chain scission rate is directly proportional to
the MW of the polymers with above the limiting molecular weight. Comparing scission of
Palladium and Platinum containing polymers showed the influence of ligand dissociation
energy on mechanochemical response of the coordination polymers. Pd-‐NHC (195 kJ/mol)
and Pt-‐NHC (245 kJ/mol) have limiting MWs as 20 and 22 kDa respectively. The force
required to break the bond, Fmax , was calculated using COGEF method. Two important
113
conclusions can be drawn from the results of these calculations: (i) Mlim scales with Fmax and
(ii) direction of pulling and the choice of attachment points are important when determining
the value of Fmax.
Free NHC released during sonication was used to induce chemiluminescence via proton
abstraction from a 2-‐coumaranone derivative, which decomposes via a chemiluminescent
pathway in the presence of oxygen. Using the chemiluminescent response, the rate of
ultrasound induced scission and molecular weight threshold (Mlim) for mechanochemical
chain scission were determined in Chapter 3. The rate constants were also simulated using
GEPASI, which showed that the rate-‐determining step is the decomposition of
coumaranone.
The MW dependence of chain scission rates proves that the bond scission observed during
sonication is mechanically induced. However, it is still arguable that trapping agents
promote the mechanochemical chain scission by decreasing the mechanical stability of the
ligand-‐metal coordination bond. In Chapter 4 the rates of mechanically induced ligand
exchange reactions were determined. It was established by NMR that the ligands of Pd-‐
Imidazole complexes exchange via an associative pathway, and stoichiometric complexes of
Pd-‐Imidazole do not show ligand exchange because free ligands are absent. However, free
ligands released by ultrasound initiate ligand exchange in a mixture of polymeric and low
molecular weight Pd(Im)2 complex. The rate of consumption of polymer complex, Pd(Im-‐
pTHF)2Cl2, was monitored by GPC and kinetic simulations showed that the ligand association
is the rate determining step.
In Chapter 5, mechanochemically induced ligand exchange of Pd(II) complexes was used to
direct the formation of heterocomplexes. Symmetric complexes with high and low
molecular weight polymer-‐attached ligands were mixed in solution and sonicated. When
one of the complexes has a molecular weight higher than Mlim for mechanochemical chain
scission, while the other is smaller, sonication leads to the directed formation of a
heterocomplex with two different ligands. Two Pd(Im)2Cl2 complexes with different
molecular weights were mixed in toluene and the solution was subjected to ultrasound. GPC
traces showed that the main polymer fraction after sonication was the heterocomplex.
Furthermore, pTHF attached NHC-‐Pd complexes, Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2, and
poly(methylacrylate) attached pyridine-‐Pd complexes, Pd(PyPMA)2Cl2, were also mixed with
Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and sonicated. In all cases, ultrasound-‐induced formation of heterocomplex
was observed.
In Chapter 6, preliminary results for the self-‐healing properties of polymer films of
poly(methyl acrylate)-‐vinyl imidazole copolymers, cross-‐linked by ligand metal coordination
are described.
Summary
114
conclusions can be drawn from the results of these calculations: (i) Mlim scales with Fmax and
(ii) direction of pulling and the choice of attachment points are important when determining
the value of Fmax.
Free NHC released during sonication was used to induce chemiluminescence via proton
abstraction from a 2-‐coumaranone derivative, which decomposes via a chemiluminescent
pathway in the presence of oxygen. Using the chemiluminescent response, the rate of
ultrasound induced scission and molecular weight threshold (Mlim) for mechanochemical
chain scission were determined in Chapter 3. The rate constants were also simulated using
GEPASI, which showed that the rate-‐determining step is the decomposition of
coumaranone.
The MW dependence of chain scission rates proves that the bond scission observed during
sonication is mechanically induced. However, it is still arguable that trapping agents
promote the mechanochemical chain scission by decreasing the mechanical stability of the
ligand-‐metal coordination bond. In Chapter 4 the rates of mechanically induced ligand
exchange reactions were determined. It was established by NMR that the ligands of Pd-‐
Imidazole complexes exchange via an associative pathway, and stoichiometric complexes of
Pd-‐Imidazole do not show ligand exchange because free ligands are absent. However, free
ligands released by ultrasound initiate ligand exchange in a mixture of polymeric and low
molecular weight Pd(Im)2 complex. The rate of consumption of polymer complex, Pd(Im-‐
pTHF)2Cl2, was monitored by GPC and kinetic simulations showed that the ligand association
is the rate determining step.
In Chapter 5, mechanochemically induced ligand exchange of Pd(II) complexes was used to
direct the formation of heterocomplexes. Symmetric complexes with high and low
molecular weight polymer-‐attached ligands were mixed in solution and sonicated. When
one of the complexes has a molecular weight higher than Mlim for mechanochemical chain
scission, while the other is smaller, sonication leads to the directed formation of a
heterocomplex with two different ligands. Two Pd(Im)2Cl2 complexes with different
molecular weights were mixed in toluene and the solution was subjected to ultrasound. GPC
traces showed that the main polymer fraction after sonication was the heterocomplex.
Furthermore, pTHF attached NHC-‐Pd complexes, Pd(NHC-‐pTHF)2Cl2, and
poly(methylacrylate) attached pyridine-‐Pd complexes, Pd(PyPMA)2Cl2, were also mixed with
Pd(Im-‐pTHF)2Cl2 and sonicated. In all cases, ultrasound-‐induced formation of heterocomplex
was observed.
In Chapter 6, preliminary results for the self-‐healing properties of polymer films of
poly(methyl acrylate)-‐vinyl imidazole copolymers, cross-‐linked by ligand metal coordination
are described.
Summary
115
Curriculum Vitae
Abidin Balan was born on August 27th, 1983 in Malatya, Turkey. He received his BSc in chemistry from Bilkent University in 2007. He then joined the group of Prof. Levent Toppare at Middle East Technical University (METU) to pursue an MSc in chemistry. In his MSc studies, he focused on the synthesis of the Donor–Acceptor type conjugated polymers, mainly benzotriazole derivatives for the application in electrochromic devices and organic solar cells. His master thesis was awarded as the thesis of the year in 2009 (METU). In 2010, he started his PhD in Macromolecular and Organic Chemistry Group at Eindhoven University of Technology, under supervision of Prof. Rint Sijbesma. The most important results of this research are described in this thesis.
Curriculum Vitae
Abidin Balan was born on August 27th, 1983 in Malatya, Turkey. He received his BSc in chemistry from Bilkent University in 2007. He then joined the group of Prof. Levent Toppare at Middle East Technical University (METU) to pursue an MSc in chemistry. In his MSc studies, he focused on the synthesis of the Donor–Acceptor type conjugated polymers, mainly benzotriazole derivatives for the application in electrochromic devices and organic solar cells. His master thesis was awarded as the thesis of the year in 2009 (METU). In 2010, he started his PhD in Macromolecular and Organic Chemistry Group at Eindhoven University of Technology, under supervision of Prof. Rint Sijbesma. The most important results of this research are described in this thesis.
117
Acknowledgements
First and foremost, I would like to express my deepest gratitude, profound respect and sincere thanks to my supervisor prof. dr. Rint Sijbesma for giving me the opportunity to perform my PhD study in his group. It was a great pleasure and privilege for me to be a member of your group. Your scientific guidance always helped me to find my way out during my PhD.
I would like to thank my co-‐supervisor prof. dr. Bert Meijer and members of my promotion committee prof. dr. Giancarlo Cravotto, prof. dr. Joost Reek, prof. dr. ir. Emiel Hensen and prof. dr. Albert Schenning for their valuable comments and suggestions on my thesis.
I would like to thank dr. Bartek Szyja for theoretical calculations reported in Chapter 2 and Serge Söntjens for helping me with the 500 MHz NMR used for the experiments reported in Chapter 4.
Ralph Bovee and Xianwen Lou, I would like to thank both of you for the help and support you provided in the analytical lab. I appreciate the great discussions we had over scientific and non-‐scientific topics.
Ramon and Sascha, thank you very much for being by my side as my paranymphs. Ramon, I always enjoyed your companionship in and outside the lab. Having thought provoking discussions with you was inspiring for me. Sascha, thank you for being such a good friend and sharing the most memorable moments of my life. It was a lot of fun to enjoy Turkish cuisine with you and have you in the big Turkish community in Eindhoven.
Dear Bob, thank you for being the one who provided me with the most generous support during my PhD. Having you in the next office made me feel more confident as I always knew that you would be ready to help whenever I needed. I think we should keep our quarterly meetings going together with Ramon. Being friend with you guys means a lot to me.
My former office mate, Yulan Chen; you are a very good friend and an excellent scientist. Sometimes I miss our conversations in the office over many different topics. Thank you for introducing me different aspects of Chinese culture. I hope to visit you in China soon. Jody Lugger; you have taken Yulan’s seat after she left and I should say I enjoyed a lot being in the same office with you. You are very enthusiastic and always eager to learn person and I wish you a lot of success for the rest of your PhD.
Acknowledgements
First and foremost, I would like to express my deepest gratitude, profound respect and sincere thanks to my supervisor prof. dr. Rint Sijbesma for giving me the opportunity to perform my PhD study in his group. It was a great pleasure and privilege for me to be a member of your group. Your scientific guidance always helped me to find my way out during my PhD.
I would like to thank my co-‐supervisor prof. dr. Bert Meijer and members of my promotion committee prof. dr. Giancarlo Cravotto, prof. dr. Joost Reek, prof. dr. ir. Emiel Hensen and prof. dr. Albert Schenning for their valuable comments and suggestions on my thesis.
I would like to thank dr. Bartek Szyja for theoretical calculations reported in Chapter 2 and Serge Söntjens for helping me with the 500 MHz NMR used for the experiments reported in Chapter 4.
Ralph Bovee and Xianwen Lou, I would like to thank both of you for the help and support you provided in the analytical lab. I appreciate the great discussions we had over scientific and non-‐scientific topics.
Ramon and Sascha, thank you very much for being by my side as my paranymphs. Ramon, I always enjoyed your companionship in and outside the lab. Having thought provoking discussions with you was inspiring for me. Sascha, thank you for being such a good friend and sharing the most memorable moments of my life. It was a lot of fun to enjoy Turkish cuisine with you and have you in the big Turkish community in Eindhoven.
Dear Bob, thank you for being the one who provided me with the most generous support during my PhD. Having you in the next office made me feel more confident as I always knew that you would be ready to help whenever I needed. I think we should keep our quarterly meetings going together with Ramon. Being friend with you guys means a lot to me.
My former office mate, Yulan Chen; you are a very good friend and an excellent scientist. Sometimes I miss our conversations in the office over many different topics. Thank you for introducing me different aspects of Chinese culture. I hope to visit you in China soon. Jody Lugger; you have taken Yulan’s seat after she left and I should say I enjoyed a lot being in the same office with you. You are very enthusiastic and always eager to learn person and I wish you a lot of success for the rest of your PhD.
119
Pauline, Lech, Katja (and Alexandra Sophie J), Samanneh, Erik, Marta, Veronique, Marcel K., Dana, Berry, Jessica, Xiao, Remco, Marcel S., Jurgen, Olga, Ralph, Thuur, Asish, Abhijit, Gajanan; I would like to thank all of you for being so friendly. Having such great scientists like you around me made my life in MST perfectly pleasant.
I would like to thank Joke Rediker, Marjo van Hoof, Jolanda Spiering, Bas de Waal, Hans Damen and Henk Eding for their great help during my PhD. My life would be much more difficult without them.
Now comes the Turkish part.
Tezin en zor bölümü teşekkür bölümüymüş. Ne çok anı, ne güzel dostluklar biriktirmişiz. Düşündükçe daha da yoğunlaşıyor duygular. Keşke şu anda hissettiklerim kendiliğinden dökülse bu sayfaya.
Gönüllerin muhtarı Barış Yağcı ve sevgili başkan Seda Cantekin’le başlamalıyım sanırım. Eindhoven’a ilk geldiğim zamanlar hissettiğim sudan çıkmış balık şaşkınlığını, o zamandan bugüne hiç eksilmeyen muhteşem dostluğunuz sayesinde aştım. Vefalı arkadaş tabiri sanırım en çok ikinize uyar. İkinizi de çok seviyorum. Barış hocam, hem Hollanda’daki arkadaşlığın hem de İstanbul’daki misafirperverliğin için ayrı ayrı teşekkür ederim. Şu an sana sarılmak istiyorum J. Sedacım, seninle vakit geçirmek benim için hep çok keyifli oldu. Nereye gittiğimizi bilmediğimiz araba yolculukları, bilimsel tartışmalar veya zaman zaman senden sopa yemek… Samimiyetin için çok teşekkürler.
Başar efendi… Tartışmalar, sohbetler, geziler, belgeseller, filmler, şarkılar, türküler, çaylar kahveler, çeşitli içmeler… Sana bu paylaşımlarımızın her biri için tek tek teşekkür ederim. Dostluğun benim için çok değerli. Şimdi bu teşekkürden sonra benden kurtulacağını düşünüyorsan yanılıyorsun J. Umuyorum ki çok uzun yıllar daha görüşmeye devam edeceğiz sevgili dostum.
Ali Can kardeşim, hayatı sen yaşıyorsun J. Sohbetlerimiz ve tartışmalarımız bana çok şey öğretti. Doktoramın en sıkıntılı zamanlarını aydınlatıcı belgesel seanslarımız ve içtiğimiz kırmızı şaraplar renklendirdi. Bütün bunların yeri ayrı bende ama sana en çok kalbinde taşıdığın özgürlük ateşi ve her türlü otoriteyi sorgulama kararlılığı için teşekkür ederim.
Gökhan hocam, etrafına yaydığın neşe için, ne olursa olsun pozitif düşünüp umut dolu olabildiğin için çok teşekkür ederim. Umarım ileride sahip olmayı düşündüğüm çocuk(lar) senin gibi bir akademisyenden eğitim alma şansını yakalar(lar). Bu satırlar yazıya dökülürken hayatını birleştirmek üzere olduğun eşine ve sana çok mutlu bir hayat dilerim.
Kamiiiil… Hocam seninle ilgili anılarımızı düşünürken, çok yağmur yağdığı bir gün evde atomların yapısı hakkında yaptığımız uzun ve çok keyifli bir sohbete takıldı aklım. En son bir su hortumunun iki ucundan karşılıklı tutup sallayarak elektronların hareketlerini ve orbitalleri anlamaya çalıştığımızı hatırlıyorum J. Pek çok ufuk açan, algı zorlayan tartışmalarımız oldu seninle. Bunların yanında hayattan keyif almak için de neredeyse hiçbir fırsatı kaçırmadık. Tüm bu anılar için sana çok teşekkür ederim.
Teyzemin evladı Can Nemlioğlu. Gerçek bir sincan delikanlısı J. Büyük projelerin insanı. Her ne kadar politik tartışmalarda ayrı görüşleri savunsak da seninle tartışmaktan her zaman büyük keyif aldım. Seni tanıdığım için çok mutluyum.
Egelstraat 11a ve bu adresin hayatıma kattığı güzel insanlar. Başar, Kamil, Can, Barış, güzel sohbetiyle, titizliğiyle, çektiği birbirinden güzel fotoğraflarıyla İlkin, bütün bir günü tek cümleyle geçirebilecek kadar az ve öz konuşan Cengiz, heyecanı cümlelerinde devrilen Gözde, hikayeleriyle hepimizi gözyaşlarına boğan, acıların çocuğu Alios, tanıdığım en sakin insan olan Öncü, kavgaların eşiğinde, direnişçi Kıvılcım... Hepinizi çok seviyorum.
Ceylan, Sinan, Banu, Oktay, Demet, Ümit, Roos, Atilla, Sena, Bahadır, Seda L., Kubilay, Tekin Hocam, Tayfun abi ve ETÜD sakinleri, hepinize Hollanda’daki hayatıma anlam kattığınız için teşekkür ederim. Benim için çok kıymetli insanlarsınız. Daha pek çok partilerde, kamplarda, gezilerde, toplantılarda, gösteri-‐protesto ve forumlarda buluşmak dileğiyle.
Sevgili Sema, hayatımın ciddi bir şekilde değişmeye başladığı, pek çok önemli adımın atıldığı bir dönemde tam da ihtiyacım olan arkadaşlığı sunduğun ve en unutulmaz anlarda tüm mesafelere rağmen yanımda olmayı tercih ettiğin için teşekkür ederim.
Hollanda Gezi Dayanışması üyeleri, Osman Hocam, Kıvılcım, Hande, Maral, Leyla, Yaşar, Burhan, Çiğdem, Hakan, Nil, Levent, Elif, Eylem, Derya ve adını yazmadığım herkese sonsuz teşekkürler. Umut dolu, samimi, sıcacık insanlarsınız ve iyi ki varsınız.
Annem, babam ve Ceren... Sizin gibi bir ailem olduğu için çok şanslıyım. Sevginizi, desteğinizi ve güveninizi benden hiçbir zaman esirgemediğiniz için size ne kadar teşekkür etsem azdır.
ve Gizem... En iyi arkadaşım, diğer yarım... Bu tezin içindeki her deney hasretinle, sana kavuşmanın hayaliyle yapıldı. Çok bekledik, zorlandık, kızdık, küstük ama demek ki en çok da sevdik. Yoksa aşılır mıydı onca sınır? Ceylan’ın da dediği gibi beklediğime değdi J.
Abidin
Acknowledgements
120
Pauline, Lech, Katja (and Alexandra Sophie J), Samanneh, Erik, Marta, Veronique, Marcel K., Dana, Berry, Jessica, Xiao, Remco, Marcel S., Jurgen, Olga, Ralph, Thuur, Asish, Abhijit, Gajanan; I would like to thank all of you for being so friendly. Having such great scientists like you around me made my life in MST perfectly pleasant.
I would like to thank Joke Rediker, Marjo van Hoof, Jolanda Spiering, Bas de Waal, Hans Damen and Henk Eding for their great help during my PhD. My life would be much more difficult without them.
Now comes the Turkish part.
Tezin en zor bölümü teşekkür bölümüymüş. Ne çok anı, ne güzel dostluklar biriktirmişiz. Düşündükçe daha da yoğunlaşıyor duygular. Keşke şu anda hissettiklerim kendiliğinden dökülse bu sayfaya.
Gönüllerin muhtarı Barış Yağcı ve sevgili başkan Seda Cantekin’le başlamalıyım sanırım. Eindhoven’a ilk geldiğim zamanlar hissettiğim sudan çıkmış balık şaşkınlığını, o zamandan bugüne hiç eksilmeyen muhteşem dostluğunuz sayesinde aştım. Vefalı arkadaş tabiri sanırım en çok ikinize uyar. İkinizi de çok seviyorum. Barış hocam, hem Hollanda’daki arkadaşlığın hem de İstanbul’daki misafirperverliğin için ayrı ayrı teşekkür ederim. Şu an sana sarılmak istiyorum J. Sedacım, seninle vakit geçirmek benim için hep çok keyifli oldu. Nereye gittiğimizi bilmediğimiz araba yolculukları, bilimsel tartışmalar veya zaman zaman senden sopa yemek… Samimiyetin için çok teşekkürler.
Başar efendi… Tartışmalar, sohbetler, geziler, belgeseller, filmler, şarkılar, türküler, çaylar kahveler, çeşitli içmeler… Sana bu paylaşımlarımızın her biri için tek tek teşekkür ederim. Dostluğun benim için çok değerli. Şimdi bu teşekkürden sonra benden kurtulacağını düşünüyorsan yanılıyorsun J. Umuyorum ki çok uzun yıllar daha görüşmeye devam edeceğiz sevgili dostum.
Ali Can kardeşim, hayatı sen yaşıyorsun J. Sohbetlerimiz ve tartışmalarımız bana çok şey öğretti. Doktoramın en sıkıntılı zamanlarını aydınlatıcı belgesel seanslarımız ve içtiğimiz kırmızı şaraplar renklendirdi. Bütün bunların yeri ayrı bende ama sana en çok kalbinde taşıdığın özgürlük ateşi ve her türlü otoriteyi sorgulama kararlılığı için teşekkür ederim.
Gökhan hocam, etrafına yaydığın neşe için, ne olursa olsun pozitif düşünüp umut dolu olabildiğin için çok teşekkür ederim. Umarım ileride sahip olmayı düşündüğüm çocuk(lar) senin gibi bir akademisyenden eğitim alma şansını yakalar(lar). Bu satırlar yazıya dökülürken hayatını birleştirmek üzere olduğun eşine ve sana çok mutlu bir hayat dilerim.
Kamiiiil… Hocam seninle ilgili anılarımızı düşünürken, çok yağmur yağdığı bir gün evde atomların yapısı hakkında yaptığımız uzun ve çok keyifli bir sohbete takıldı aklım. En son bir su hortumunun iki ucundan karşılıklı tutup sallayarak elektronların hareketlerini ve orbitalleri anlamaya çalıştığımızı hatırlıyorum J. Pek çok ufuk açan, algı zorlayan tartışmalarımız oldu seninle. Bunların yanında hayattan keyif almak için de neredeyse hiçbir fırsatı kaçırmadık. Tüm bu anılar için sana çok teşekkür ederim.
Teyzemin evladı Can Nemlioğlu. Gerçek bir sincan delikanlısı J. Büyük projelerin insanı. Her ne kadar politik tartışmalarda ayrı görüşleri savunsak da seninle tartışmaktan her zaman büyük keyif aldım. Seni tanıdığım için çok mutluyum.
Egelstraat 11a ve bu adresin hayatıma kattığı güzel insanlar. Başar, Kamil, Can, Barış, güzel sohbetiyle, titizliğiyle, çektiği birbirinden güzel fotoğraflarıyla İlkin, bütün bir günü tek cümleyle geçirebilecek kadar az ve öz konuşan Cengiz, heyecanı cümlelerinde devrilen Gözde, hikayeleriyle hepimizi gözyaşlarına boğan, acıların çocuğu Alios, tanıdığım en sakin insan olan Öncü, kavgaların eşiğinde, direnişçi Kıvılcım... Hepinizi çok seviyorum.
Ceylan, Sinan, Banu, Oktay, Demet, Ümit, Roos, Atilla, Sena, Bahadır, Seda L., Kubilay, Tekin Hocam, Tayfun abi ve ETÜD sakinleri, hepinize Hollanda’daki hayatıma anlam kattığınız için teşekkür ederim. Benim için çok kıymetli insanlarsınız. Daha pek çok partilerde, kamplarda, gezilerde, toplantılarda, gösteri-‐protesto ve forumlarda buluşmak dileğiyle.
Sevgili Sema, hayatımın ciddi bir şekilde değişmeye başladığı, pek çok önemli adımın atıldığı bir dönemde tam da ihtiyacım olan arkadaşlığı sunduğun ve en unutulmaz anlarda tüm mesafelere rağmen yanımda olmayı tercih ettiğin için teşekkür ederim.
Hollanda Gezi Dayanışması üyeleri, Osman Hocam, Kıvılcım, Hande, Maral, Leyla, Yaşar, Burhan, Çiğdem, Hakan, Nil, Levent, Elif, Eylem, Derya ve adını yazmadığım herkese sonsuz teşekkürler. Umut dolu, samimi, sıcacık insanlarsınız ve iyi ki varsınız.
Annem, babam ve Ceren... Sizin gibi bir ailem olduğu için çok şanslıyım. Sevginizi, desteğinizi ve güveninizi benden hiçbir zaman esirgemediğiniz için size ne kadar teşekkür etsem azdır.
ve Gizem... En iyi arkadaşım, diğer yarım... Bu tezin içindeki her deney hasretinle, sana kavuşmanın hayaliyle yapıldı. Çok bekledik, zorlandık, kızdık, küstük ama demek ki en çok da sevdik. Yoksa aşılır mıydı onca sınır? Ceylan’ın da dediği gibi beklediğime değdi J.
Abidin
Acknowledgements
121