mechatronics control system architecture for humanoid ...€¦ · case study is moog 30 series...

1
Anas AMMOUNAH Samer ALFAYAD, Stephane DELAPLACE, Sami TLIBA Université Paris-Saclay Meet-up 2019 | Doctorants & Industrie Mechatronics Control System Architecture for Humanoid Robot Dynamic study Servo-valve driver ED: Sciences et Technologies de l'Information et de la Communication Université Paris Saclay Anas AMMOUNAH Contacts : 1. CONTEXT 2. RESEARCH QUESTION 3. THE NEED 4. POWER STAGE and TRANSFER FUNCTION 5. RESULTS 6. FUTURE WORK REFERENCES [1] Type 30 Nozzle-Flapper Flow Control Servo-Valves, Corporate Headquarters - Moog Inc., East Aurora, New York 14052-0018. [2] S. Caron, A. Kheddar, O. Tempier. Stair Climbing Stabilization of the HRP-4Humanoid Robot using Whole-body Admittance Control. IEEE International Conference on Roboticsand Automation, May 2019, Montréal, France. Mechatronics development of humanoid robots is one of the key challenges where we have hard constrains on both software and hardware used in the mechatronics control system architecture of the humanoid robot. Hydraulic robots like HYDROïD have additional challenges because of the complex hydraulic systems and the characteristics of servo-valve driving. We focus in this poster on the power amplifier stage of the servo-valve driver and the dynamic behavior. We should use current control signal, and we propose current source configuration with high voltage supply, the transfer function is given by the following equation: The dynamics of humanoid robots is very high, for example, electrical robots like HRP4 robot perform a whole body control loop of 5ms while the local control loop perform at 1 kHz. The hydraulic control system is based on servo-valve. Commercial servo-valve do not provide quick response for high-inductance servo-valves. In addition, such drivers are bulky and cannot be embedded on humanoid robots. The need is to develop one customized driver to drive multiple servo-valves of the robot. The case study is Moog 30 series servo-valve, the electrical model of this servo-valve is R-L model (R=1 kOhm , L=3.2 Henry). The natural step response time is 10ms when using a voltage control signal or commercial driver, this performance is not enough for humanoid robot. We present dynamic performance of the presented power amplifier using different supply voltage. We compare it with commercial driver (orange curve). Our future objective is to apply this approach on the whole robot and integrate it with the other elements of the system architecture including the real-time software and the sensors. Then we apply highly dynamic movement.

Upload: others

Post on 03-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mechatronics Control System Architecture for Humanoid ...€¦ · case study is Moog 30 series servo-valve, the electrical model of this servo-valve is R-L model (R=1 kOhm , L=3.2

Anas AMMOUNAH

Samer ALFAYAD, Stephane DELAPLACE, Sami TLIBA

Université Paris-Saclay

Meet-up 2019 | Doctorants & Industrie

Mechatronics Control System Architecture for Humanoid RobotDynamic study Servo-valve driver

ED: Sciences et Technologies de l'Information et de la CommunicationUniversité Paris SaclayAnas AMMOUNAH

Contacts :

1. CONTEXT

2. RESEARCH QUESTION

3. THE NEED

4. POWER STAGE and TRANSFER FUNCTION

5. RESULTS

6. FUTURE WORK

REFERENCES[1] Type 30 Nozzle-Flapper Flow Control Servo-Valves, Corporate Headquarters - Moog Inc., East Aurora, New York 14052-0018.[2] S. Caron, A. Kheddar, O. Tempier. Stair Climbing Stabilization of the HRP-4Humanoid Robot using Whole-body Admittance Control. IEEE International Conference on Roboticsand Automation, May 2019, Montréal, France.

Mechatronics development of humanoid robotsis one of the key challenges where we have hardconstrains on both software and hardware usedin the mechatronics control system architectureof the humanoid robot. Hydraulic robots likeHYDROïD have additional challenges because ofthe complex hydraulic systems and thecharacteristics of servo-valve driving. We focusin this poster on the power amplifier stage ofthe servo-valve driver and the dynamic behavior.

We should use current control signal, and wepropose current source configuration with highvoltage supply,

the transfer functionis given by thefollowing equation:

The dynamics of humanoid robots is very high,for example, electrical robots like HRP4 robotperform a whole body control loop of 5ms whilethe local control loop perform at 1 kHz. Thehydraulic control system is based on servo-valve.Commercial servo-valve do not provide quickresponse for high-inductance servo-valves. Inaddition, such drivers are bulky and cannot beembedded on humanoid robots.

The need is to develop one customized driver todrive multiple servo-valves of the robot. Thecase study is Moog 30 series servo-valve, theelectrical model of this servo-valve is R-L model(R=1 kOhm , L=3.2 Henry). The natural stepresponse time is 10ms when using a voltagecontrol signal or commercial driver, thisperformance is not enough for humanoid robot.

We present dynamic performance of the presentedpower amplifier using different supply voltage. Wecompare it with commercial driver (orange curve).

Our future objective is to apply this approach on thewhole robot and integrate it with the otherelements of the system architecture including thereal-time software and the sensors. Then we applyhighly dynamic movement.