media optimization strategies for t cell therapy manufacturing...cryo lot release and...
TRANSCRIPT
The world leader in serving science
Angel Varela
BioProduction
Cell Culture & Cell Therapy R&D
Media Optimization Strategies for T cell Therapy Manufacturing
2
Pharma: Past, Present and Future
Increasing Complexity
Chemical
Penicillin
(243 Da)
Antibody
Immunoglobulin G
(150,000 Da)
Protein
Lysozyme
(14,700 Da)
Virus
Influenza
(176 x106 Da)
Cell
Human cell
(~2 ng)
Our industry has moved past chemical drugs into biologics with
an increased interest and investment in gene and cell
therapies
Cell Therapy requires manufacture of very complex therapies
where the cell is the drug
Proprietary & Confidential
3
Main Cell & Gene Therapy Production Workflows
Gene-
Modified T
cell (auto)
Gene Therapy/
Vector
Production
Cell isolation and
activation Cell engineering Cell expansion
Wash, fill, finish, and
cryo
Lot release and
characterization
Plasmid
construction
Cell line
transfection Viral production Viral purification
Wash, fill, finish and
cryo
Lot release and
characterization
MSC (allo) Cell
isolation Cell expansion Cell modification
Lot release and
characterization
Wash, fill, finish and
cryo
Proprietary & Confidential
4
Allogeneic Vs. Autologous Therapies
Master Cell Bank Lot Tested
Patient Doses Lot Tested
Cell E
xp
an
sio
n
Cell E
xp
an
sio
n
Testing
Patient or Donor
Cell Ampoule or Dose
Submitted for Testing
Allogeneic / Universal Donor
Autologous / Patient Specific
Proprietary & Confidential
5
CAR and TCR Gene Transfer: Most Common T cell Engineering Modalities
CAR: Reacts to Surface Proteins TCR: Reacts to Intracellular and Surface Proteins
Targets are native surface proteins
HLA-independent
CD19 CD20
Mesothelin CD38
HER2/neu
EGFRvIII
Targets are peptides derived from intracellular and
surface proteins presented in HLA molecules
Viral
antigens
MAGE
NY-ESO MART-1
WT-1
Proprietary & Confidential
6
1. Obtain cells from patient and enrich
or isolate particular cells of interest
4. Large scale cell expansion
Reinfuse
cells
5. Remove beads and wash cells
2. Stimulate cells to
grow
3. Insert therapeutic genes
into cells
6. Quality Control What are the best T cells
for immunotherapy?
What is the best way
to expand T cells?
What is the best way
to engineer T cells?
How many cells do we really
need?
How do we
monitor adoptive
T cell therapies?
What assays will be predictive
of in vivo efficacy and safety?
Process & Challenges: Adoptive T cell Immunotherapy
How to manufacture
more efficiently?
Proprietary & Confidential
7
Limited availability of serum as a manufacturing raw material
Proprietary & Confidential
8
Challenges of Serum for T cell Therapy Manufacturing
• Performance concerns
• Undefined composition
• Lot-to-lot variability
• Lot qualification time and effort
• Regulatory/safety concerns
• Potential for adventitious agents
• Supply chain concerns
Treating 10,000 patients per year with CTL019
(CART19):
• 80,000 liters of cell culture media
• 4,000L of huAB serum (!)
Sera variability impacts process and product
Transduction Efficiency
T cell Expansion
control
huAB serum #1
huAB serum #2
huAB serum #3
huAB serum #4
huAB serum #5
huAB serum #6
control
huAB serum #1
huAB serum #2
huAB serum #3
huAB serum #4
huAB serum #5
huAB serum #6
20-40% variability in transduction
15-50% variability
in T cell yields
Proprietary & Confidential
9
CTS™ Immune Cell SR
CTS™ Immune Cell SR is the first defined, T-cell qualified xeno-free replacement for human serum
that provides consistent serum-like performance without supply risk.
Parameter SPEC
Functional T Cell Assay Acceptable vs. internal assay control
pH >=7.0 to <=7.7
Osmolality > =430 to < =500
Mycoplasma testing (qPCR) Negative
USP Sterility testing Negative
Endotoxin testing (LAL) >=0.0 to <=10.0
HBsAg, HIV1&2, HCV virus testing Non-reactive (Ab)
Specifications
Proprietary & Confidential
10
CTS™ Immune Cell SR
Security of Supply
Consistent Performance
Flexible
Primary
T cell tested
Regulatory friendly
Scalable, cGMP
(21CFR part 820)
CE-IVD
USP 1043
ISO 13485
Full Traceability: COO, COA, donor
testing, DMF
Direct replacement for human
serum
Cost competitive
No need to pre-qualify lots
Clinical & Translational Immunology (2015) 4, e31; doi:10.1038/cti.2014.31;
published online 16 January 2015
Comparable expansion performance to human serum supplementation in
commercial T cell media formulations
QA/QCrelease assay based on CTS
Dynabeads CD3/CD28 and primary
human T cells
Proprietary & Confidential
11
CTS™ Immune Cell SR – In vivo testing
NSG mice
Leukemia
1x106
Control of
leukemia
T cell
engraftment
T cell
persistence
CART-19
10x106
Mouse
survival
Expansion
Transduction
Phenotype
We wanted to test CTSTM Immune Cell SR in an in vivo model of CAR-T immunotherapy to validate comparable
performance to human AB serum
Proprietary & Confidential
12
CA
RT
-19
2% hu AB Serum 2% Immune Cell SR
CCR7
CD62L
CTS™ Immune Cell SR Similar Expansion, Phenotype and Transduction Efficiency
Data from James L. Riley, University of Pennsylvania
Proprietary & Confidential
13
In vivo efficacy of CART-19 cells expanded in CTS™ Immune Cell SR
Mock transduced
OpTmizer +2% hAB
OpTmizer +2% ICSR
Data from James L. Riley, University of Pennsylvania
Proprietary & Confidential
14
• Serum introduces challenges and risks for cell therapy manufacturing
• CTSTM Immune Cell SR can replace human AB serum in CAR-T manufacturing workflows,
maintaining
• Expansion
• Function
• Phenotype
• Efficacy
• Potency
• CTSTM Immune Cell SR is a practical and scalable solution for T cell therapy manufacturing
processes
Summary 1
Proprietary & Confidential
15
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 5 10 15 20
VCD
(x10
6vi
able
cel
ls pe
r mL)
culture time (days)
0%
100%
200%
300%
400%
0 5 10 15 20
IgG
titer
(% o
f bat
ch)
culture time (days)
CD CHO+40% EFB
CD CHO+40% EFB+14% F3.4
Cell Culture Media: State of the Art
• Protein Production/Vaccines
• Cells produce the therapy
• Homogenous cell population
• Cells can be adapted to new media
• Well established/scalable processes
• Cellular Therapies
• The cells are the therapy
• Heterogeneous cell population
• Media must support cell growth directly
• Divergent/emerging culture systems
Current media and supplement technologies enable
improvements in IgG and viral titers
CHO (IgG) BHK-21 (Virus)
?
Unmet need to provide media and scalable workflows to
increase productivity
Increased Productivity
Proprietary & Confidential
16
Better T Cell Drugs – Thermo Fisher Scientific Innovation
Leukemia
HIV
Solid
tumors
Autoimmune
diseases
other blood cancers
Dynabeads™ & Gibco®
products for
activation & expansion of
T cell subsets
Can Next Gen Technologies Improve T Cells Drug
Safety, Efficacy and Persistence?
Proprietary & Confidential
17
Signals to Drive T cell Subset Differentiation
Th1
Th9
Th2
Th22
Th17
Treg
Naïve
T cells
Signal 1 + 2 Signal 3
Cytokines
&
Growth Factors
Signal 4
T cell subsets use different
metabolic pathways
Cytokines support
expansion of T cell
subsets
Proprietary & Confidential
18
Better T Cell Drugs – Cell Culture Product Innovation
Signal 1 + 2 Optimized biological effect of
signal 1 + 2 + 3 + 4
Media: analyze metabolic
pathways & nutrient consumption
rate for optimal balanced
formulation
3
2 1
Beads/antibodies: balanced
antibody conjugation to a solid
surface for optimal action &
proliferation
Cytokines: defined
mix & concentration for
optimal T cell subset expansion
4 Naïve
T cells
Th1
Th9
Th2
Th22
Th17
Treg
Proprietary & Confidential
19
Learning From T Cell Metabolic Pathways for Media Development
Buck, et al. J. Exp. Med. 2015 Vol. 212 No. 9 1345–1360
Proprietary & Confidential
20
0%
500%
1000%
1500%
2000%
2500%
3000%
3500%
4000%
4500%
5000%
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Culture time, day
Alanine
MM4
MM7
MM8
MM15
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Culture time, day
Asparagine
MM4
MM7
MM8
MM15
Media Development Strategy
Amino AcidConsumption Rate
(mmol/day)
L-ALANINE -0.251
L-ARGININE 0.055
L-ASPARAGINE 0.054
L-ASPARTIC ACID 0.045
L- CYSTINE 0.083
L-GLUTAMIC ACID 0.055
GLYCINE 0.068
L-HISTIDINE 0.024
L-ISOLEUCINE 0.048
L-LEUCINE 0.046
L-LYSINE 0.043
L-METHIONINE 0.036
L-PHENYLALANINE 0.061
L-PROLINE 0.057
L-SERINE 0.07
L-THREONINE 0.05
L-TRYPTOPHAN 0.039
L-TYROSINE 0.062
L-VALINE 0.064
Calculate consumption
rates
Analyze metabolic pathways/
surface marker expression/cell phenotype/effector
function
Optimized balanced formulation
Perform spent media
analysis
Sample target process Analyze growth/viability
Proprietary & Confidential
21
D139 started 30Aug13 Recombinant Study
Time (day)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Cum
ulat
ive
Tce
lls (
tc x
10E
6)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
XVivo + 5% huABS
Tcell Prototype SFM 1
Tcell Prototype SFM 2
Case Study: CAR-T cell Medium Optimization
Control + serum
Medium 1
A2184 started 6Sept13 Recombinant Study
Time (day)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Cum
ulat
ive
Tce
lls (
tc x
10E
6)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
XVivo + 5% huABS
Tcell Prototype SFM 1
Tcell Prototype SFM 2
Serum-free
Media Prototypes Media Variant Screen + Statistical Analysis =
Results:
Prototype xeno-free serum-free media meet or exceed the performance of
serum-containing commercial medium
Proprietary & Confidential
22
Metabolic Control by Media Optimization
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
Day 0 Day 3 Day 5 Day7 Day 10 Day 12
Lact
ate
g/L
P
op
ula
tio
n D
ou
blin
gs
0
20
40
60
% IF
Ng+
IFNy
IL-2
Medium 4 Medium 8 Medium 10
Media can be tailored to achieve a balance of the
desired effector function and favorable metabolic profile
Days Post Stimulation
Proprietary & Confidential
23
Luminex™ -based 35-plex Potency Assay
Useful tool to dissect T cell function in response to media modifications
1
10
100
1000
10000
pg
/ml
AOF SF X-VIVO
Invitrogen Cytokine Human Magnetic 35-Plex Panel for Luminex™
control
Proprietary & Confidential
24
Transcriptomic Analysis to Verify Gene Expression Profiles
Full transcriptomic analysis can be used to
understand gene expression dynamics in new
serum-free vs control media
Proprietary & Confidential
25
Regulatory T cell Media Development
Treg are immunosuppresive T cells that express
the transcription factor FoxP3
Treg therapies are being explored as treatments
for autoimmunity and chronic inflammation
Tregs favor OxPhos over glycolysis; we exploited
this for media development
Treg Dynabead prototype was used as activation
reagent for media optimization
Proprietary & Confidential
26
Treg Serum-free Media Development - DOE Challenges
Expansion efficiency and FoxP3 enrichment resulted in opposing responses
FoxP3
Growth
Proprietary & Confidential
27
Po
pu
lati
on
Do
ub
lin
gs
Time (days)
Treg >70% Treg ~40%
10%huSerum
+ Treg Dynabead Treg serum-free
+ Treg Dynabead
Additional Optimization – Treg Media Development
Result: Optimal Culture System To Expand Treg cells
Proprietary & Confidential
28
• Treg SFM and Dynabeads prototypes
expand stable and potent Tregs
• X-VIVO 15 +10% hAB -expanded Tregs require
Rapamycin during expansion to maintain
suppressive capacity
• Treg SFM -expanded Tregs maintain suppressive
function even when Rapamycin is added only on
day 0 of expansion process.
Serum-free Expansion of Stable and Potent Tregs
99%
12%
99%
44%
99%
99%
Neg Ctr
Pos Ctr
10% hAB
Rapamycin
10% hAB
Rapamycin day 0
Treg SFM
Rapamycin
Treg SFM
Rapamycin day 0
1:32 (Treg:Tconv)
Proprietary & Confidential
29
• Defined, consistent solutions are needed to enable scalable, robust and
commercially viable manufacturing of cell therapies
• Media development in combination with appropriate characterization techniques
and in vivo models should be used where possible to validate critical to quality
parameters: phenotype, function, potency, persistence in vivo
• Thermo Fisher Scientific can help you develop technologies to manufacture cell
therapies with optimal balance of potency, efficacy and persistence
Conclusions
Proprietary & Confidential
30
© 2016 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. All rights reserved. All trademarks are the property of Thermo
Fisher Scientific and its subsidiaries unless otherwise specified.
Legal Disclosure
Proprietary & Confidential
31
Verification at scale +
0.0E+00
1.0E+05
2.0E+05
3.0E+05
4.0E+05
5.0E+05
6.0E+05
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
cells
/mL
Time (days)
Un-optimized
Optimized
Cell
Den
sit
y (
ce
lls
/ml)
DOE
Adapted from dos Santos et al. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2014
Case Study: MSC Medium/Process Optimization
Results: Efficient GMP-compliant MSC expansion process
Optimization resulted in 2-fold
improvement in cell yields
Proprietary & Confidential