medical ethics: introduction

52
jrr/HT10 Medical ethics: introduction Janet Radcliffe Richards Professor of Practical Philosophy University of Oxford Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

Upload: kenda

Post on 15-Feb-2016

44 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Medical ethics: introduction. Janet Radcliffe Richards Professor of Practical Philosophy University of Oxford Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics. Apprenticeship. Clinical practice. Explanation. Apprenticeship. Clinical practice. Explanation. Apprenticeship. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Medical ethics: introduction

Janet Radcliffe RichardsProfessor of Practical Philosophy

University of Oxford

Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics

Page 2: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Clinical practice

Apprenticeship

Page 3: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Clinical practice

Apprenticeship Explanation

Page 4: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Clinical practice

Current scientific beliefs

Apprenticeship Explanation

Page 5: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Clinical practice

Current scientific beliefs

Descriptions of cases

Apprenticeship Explanation

Page 6: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Page 7: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Page 8: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Page 9: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Page 10: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Clinical practice

Current scientific beliefs

Descriptions of cases

Apprenticeship Explanation

Page 11: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Clinical practice

Current scientific beliefs

Descriptions of cases

EnquiryApprenticeship Explanation

Page 12: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Clinical practice

Current scientific beliefs

Descriptions of cases

EnquiryApprenticeship Explanation

Page 13: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Clinical practice

Scientific reasoning and

research

Current scientific beliefs

Descriptions of cases

EnquiryApprenticeship Explanation

Page 14: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Clinical practice

Scientific reasoning and

research

Current scientific beliefs

FACTUAL ISSUESDescriptions of cases

EnquiryApprenticeship Explanation

Page 15: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Clinical practice

Scientific reasoning and

research

Current scientific beliefs

Descriptions of cases

EnquiryApprenticeship Explanation

Page 16: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Clinical practice

Scientific reasoning and

research

Current scientific beliefs

FACTUAL ISSUESDescriptions of cases

EnquiryApprenticeship Explanation

Page 17: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Page 18: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Page 19: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Page 20: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Page 21: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Page 22: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Clinical practice

Scientific reasoning and

research

Current scientific beliefs

Current legal and professional

standards

FACTUAL ISSUES

VALUE ISSUES

Descriptions of cases

The elements of medical education

Page 23: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Clinical practice

Scientific reasoning and

research

Current scientific beliefs

Current legal and professional

standards

FACTUAL ISSUES

VALUE ISSUES

Descriptions of cases

The elements of medical education

Page 24: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Clinical practice

Scientific reasoning and

research

Current scientific beliefs

Current legal and professional

standards

FACTUAL ISSUES

VALUE ISSUES

Descriptions of cases

Moral enquiry

The elements of medical education

Page 25: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

What is medical ethics?

‘Ethics’ has two quite different meanings:

1. A particular set of standards. In this sense ‘medical ethics’ is the set of standards accepted as appropriate for doctors.

2. Moral philosophy: an enquiry into questions about moral standards, including what standards we ought to have.

Page 26: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

‘Ethical’ is ambiguous

• Sometimes it means ‘in line with accepted professional standards’

• Sometimes it means ‘morally right’

Page 27: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Clinical practice

Scientific reasoning and

research

Current scientific beliefs

Current legal and professional

standards

FACTUAL ISSUES

VALUE ISSUES

Descriptions of cases

Moral enquiry

The elements of medical education

Page 28: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Disagreements and difficulties can come from either source

Page 29: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

The case of Dr Cox

Page 30: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

How Dr Cox might have defended his action

• Mrs B was in terrible pain• She wanted to die • No available medication could have controlled

the pain• People who are in uncontrollable pain and want

to die should be helped to do so-------------

So it was right to kill her

Page 31: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Different ways of challenging Dr Cox

• Mrs B was in terrible pain• She wanted to die • No available medication could have controlled

the pain• People who are in uncontrollable pain and want

to die should be helped to do so-------------

So it was right to kill her

Page 32: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Different ways of challenging Dr Cox

• She wasn’t in pain - just getting attention• She wanted to die • No available medication could have controlled

the pain• People who are in uncontrollable pain and want

to die should be helped to do so-------------

So it was right to kill her

Page 33: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Different ways of challenging Dr Cox

• She wasn’t in pain - just getting attention• She wanted to die • No available medication could have controlled

the pain• People who are in uncontrollable pain and want

to die should be helped to do so-------------

So it was not right to kill her

Page 34: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Different ways of challenging Dr Cox

• She wasn’t in pain - just getting attention• She wanted to die • No available medication could have controlled

the pain• People who are in uncontrollable pain and want

to die should be helped to do so-------------

So it was right to kill her

Page 35: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Different ways of challenging Dr Cox

• She wasn’t in pain - just getting attention• She was being put under pressure by the family • No available medication could have controlled

the pain• People who are in uncontrollable pain and want

to die should be helped to do so-------------

So it was right to kill her

Page 36: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Different ways of challenging Dr Cox

• She wasn’t in pain - just getting attention• She was being put under pressure by the family • No available medication could have controlled

the pain• People who are in uncontrollable pain and want

to die should be helped to do so-------------

So it was not right to kill her

Page 37: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Different ways of challenging Dr Cox

• She wasn’t in pain - just getting attention• She wanted to die • No available medication could have controlled

the pain• People who are in uncontrollable pain and want

to die should be helped to do so-------------

So it was right to kill her

Page 38: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Different ways of challenging Dr Cox

• She wasn’t in pain - just getting attention• She wanted to die • He could easily have controlled the pain by

consulting an expert colleague• People who are in uncontrollable pain and want

to die should be helped to do so-------------

So it was right to kill her

Page 39: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Different ways of challenging Dr Cox

• She wasn’t in pain - just getting attention• She wanted to die • He could easily have controlled the pain by

consulting an expert colleague• People who are in uncontrollable pain and want

to die should be helped to do so-------------

So it was not right to kill her

Page 40: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Different ways of challenging Dr Cox

• Mrs B was in terrible pain• She wanted to die • No available medication could have controlled

the pain• People who are in uncontrollable pain and want

to die should be helped to do so-------------

So it was right to kill her

Page 41: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Different ways of challenging Dr Cox

• Mrs B was in terrible pain• She wanted to die • No available medication could have controlled

the pain• Killing people or helping them to die is always

wrong-------------

So it was right to kill her

Page 42: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Different ways of challenging Dr Cox

• Mrs B was in terrible pain• She wanted to die • No available medication could have controlled

the pain• Killing people or helping them to die is always

wrong-------------

So it was not right to kill her

Page 43: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

The values determine which facts are even relevant

Page 44: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

How Dr Cox might have defended his action

• Mrs B was in terrible pain• She wanted to die • No available medication could have controlled

the pain• People who are in uncontrollable pain and want

to die should be helped to do so-------------

So it was right to kill her

Page 45: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

The advance of science and technology increases the significance of value issues in practical

reasoning.

Page 46: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Recent and current controversies

• Conjoined twins• Time limit for abortion• Sustaining patients in PVS• Fertility matters• Organ donors and the dying process

Page 47: Medical ethics: introduction

jrr/HT10

Page 48: Medical ethics: introduction

Y2 Non-competent patient/ jrr/ Dec 2005

The ‘best interests’ principle

When a patient is not competent to consent to treatment, the doctor must act in the

patient’s best interests

Page 49: Medical ethics: introduction

Y2 Non-competent patient/ jrr/ Dec 2005

Treatment in the non-competent patient’s best interests

• Length of life?• Absence of pain?• Mental abilities/ level of awareness?• Physical abilities?• Appearance to relatives and friends?• Patient’s former character and wishes?

Which elements matter at all? e.g:

Page 50: Medical ethics: introduction

Y2 Non-competent patient/ jrr/ Dec 2005

Treatment in the non-competent patient’s best interests

Page 51: Medical ethics: introduction

Y2 Non-competent patient/ jrr/ Dec 2005

Page 52: Medical ethics: introduction

Y2 Non-competent patient/ jrr/ Dec 2005

Mill’s ‘Harm Principle’

…the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant.

John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, 1859