medical faculty of oporto university biostathistic and medical informatics department

30
Medical Faculty of Medical Faculty of Oporto University Oporto University Biostathistic and Medical Informatics Department Introduction to Medicine – 1st Year Head teacher: Prof. Doutor Altamiro da Costa Pereira Supervisor: Dra. Filipa Almeida 2006/2007

Upload: rylee-may

Post on 01-Jan-2016

28 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic and Medical Informatics Department. Introduction to Medicine – 1st Year Head teacher : Prof. Doutor Altamiro da Costa Pereira Supervisor : Dra. Filipa Almeida 2006/2007. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Medical Faculty of Oporto Medical Faculty of Oporto

UniversityUniversity Biostathistic and Medical Informatics Department

Introduction to Medicine – 1st Year

Head teacher: Prof. Doutor Altamiro da Costa PereiraSupervisor: Dra. Filipa Almeida

2006/2007

Page 2: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

CCLINICALLINICAL OUTCOMES OF OUTCOMES OF Drug-eluting STENTS Drug-eluting STENTS VERSUS UNCOATED VERSUS UNCOATED STENTS IN ACUTE STENTS IN ACUTE

CORONARY DISEASECORONARY DISEASEa meta-analysis of randomized a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialscontrolled trials

Page 3: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

IntroductionIntroduction

Acute coronary artery disease (CAD) is an obstruction of the normal blood flow caused by accumulation of lipids in the coronary artery with resultant myocardial ischemia(1).

Acute Coronary Acute Coronary Artery DiseaseArtery Disease

(1) WebMD [homepage on the Internet]. c1996-2006.

Available from: http://www-emedicine.com/med/topic1567.htm

Page 4: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

(2) Braunwald E. Unstable angina: a classification. Circulation 1989; 80: 410

(3) Scirica BM, et al. Prognosis in the trombolysis in myocardial ischemia III registry according to the Braunwald unstable angina pectoris classification. JACC 2002; 90:821

Clinical Syndromes (2, 3)

The acute coronary artery disease (CAD) can be divided according to the degree of the obstruction and the extent of the myocardial ischemia into:

• Unstable Angina

• Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

• ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Page 5: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

Severe chest pain with radiation to the upper side of the body (shoulder, neck and arm) – lasting 20 min or more;Chest discomfort;Nausea and vomiting;Other symptoms: profound weakness,

dizziness, palpitations, cold perspiration, sense of impending doom, lost of conciseness.

Symptoms: (4,5)

(4) Zipes, D.P., Libby, P., Barow, R.O., Braunwald, E. Braunwald’s Heart Disease: A textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 7th Edition. Philadelphia: Elsvier Saunders. P. 1155.(5) Lee TH. Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain. NEJM 2000; 34:125

Page 6: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

The management of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome is induce reperfusion of the affected vessel.

Two different reperfusion therapies are available (6):

FibrinolysisInvasive strategy

ManagemenManagementt

(6) Antman EM et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the management of patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction JACC 2004; 12: 1458.

Page 7: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

An invasive strategy is generally preferred if: (7)

Skilled PCI lab available with surgical backupHigh risk patients with cardiogenic shock or acute pulmonary edema Contraindications to fibrinolysis including increased risk of bleedingSymptom onset more than 3 hours agoDiagnosis of acute coronary syndrome in doubt

(7) Hamm CW et al. Acute cornary syndrome: Implementation of new guidelines. Lancet 2001; 358: 1533

Management – Invasive Management – Invasive StrategyStrategy

Page 8: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

Angioplasty is the most frequent mechanical treatment used in this disease, being the percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), which uses an insufflable balloon, the most common.

The efficiency of this treatment is improved by the implantation of stents. (8)

Management – Invasive Management – Invasive StrategyStrategy

(8)Christian Spaulding, M.D., Patrick Henry, M.D., Ph.D., Emmanuel Teiger, M.D., Ph.D., Kevin Beatt, M.B., B.S., Ph.D., Ezio Bramucci, M.D. et al. Sirolimus-Eluting versus Uncoated Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction. N Eng J Med. Sept 14, 2006 number 11; 355:1093-1104

Page 9: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

StentsStentsA stent is a vascular

endoprothesis of tubular form and reduced size (microprothesis) that is introduced through a peripheral catheter in the coronary artery after an angioplasty. (9)

Its implantation aims to prevent restenosis, the most frequent life threatening complication of PCI.

(9) Manila, L, et al. João Alves Falcato (adapt and rev). Dicionário Médico. 2nd Edition. Lisboa: CMILPSI; 2001. P. 561.

Page 10: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

Coronary stents reduce the rates of abrupt closure, emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery and restenosis, but do not prevent myocardial infarction or death at six months. (10)

Drug-eluting stents provide a fair single digit number for angiographic and clinical restenosis at 9 months(11).

(10)Warren J. Cantor, Eric D. Peterson et al. Provisional stenting strategies: systematic overview and implications for clinical decision-making. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 36:1142-1151(11)Sigmund S. et al. Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Disease – The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for European Society for Cardiology. European Heart Journal. 2005. 26, 804-847.

Page 11: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

There are two main types of stents: uncoated stents or bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES).

In both cases, is required an anticoagulation regimen, usually with antiplatelet drugs (aspirin associated to ticlopidine or clopidogrel)(12).

However, the administration of clopidogrel or ticlopidine may be absent in uncoated stenting.

(12)Kasper, D.L., Braunwald, E., Fauci, A.S., Hauser, S.L., Longo, D.L., Jameson, J.L. Harrison’s – Principles of Internal Medicine. 16th Edition. EUA: McGraw-Hill (Medical Publishing Division). Vol. II, p.1461.

Page 12: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

Metallic scaffolds inserted in a vessel segment covering its interior wall

High recommended use:patients contra-indicated to a prolongated administration of clopidogrel (i.e. major extratoraxic surgery planned soon)(11).

Uncoated StentsUncoated Stents

(11) Sigmund S. et al. Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Disease – The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for European Society for Cardiology. European Heart Journal. 2005. 26, 804-847.

Page 13: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

stents coated with antiproliferative agents or immunomodulary compounds released in a controlled fashion. (11)

The stent platforms for drugs releasing may present a polymer carrier. (13)

There are several different drug-eluting stents which contain different drugs.

Drug-eluting Stents (DES)Drug-eluting Stents (DES)

(11) Sigmund S. et al. Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Disease – The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for European Society for Cardiology. European Heart Journal. 2005. 26, 804-847.(13) Cohn LH, Edmund LH Jr., et al. Cardiac Surgery in The Adult. 2nd Ed, chapter 5. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003:119185. chapter 5

Page 14: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

Nowadays there are four DES CE-certificated and available in Europe: (14)

Cypher stent, releasing Sirulimus from a polymer;

Taxus stent, releasing Paclitaxel from a polymer;

V-Flex stent, releasing Paclitaxel without a polymer;

Dexamet stent, releasing Dexamethasone from a PC coating.

(14) Silber S. When are drug-eluting stents effective? A critical analysis of the presently available data[Article in German]. Z Kardiol. 2004 Sep;93(9):649-63.

Page 15: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

NICE recommends stents that contain either sirolimus (Cypher) or paclitaxel (Taxus), because most of the research has been on these(15) and so far are the ones guaranteeing better patients’ outcomes(16).

(15) Silber S. When are drug-eluting stents effective? A critical analysis of the presently available data[Article in German]. Z Kardiol. 2004 Sep;93(9):649-63. (16) NICE (National Institute for Clinical Excellence), Coronary artery stents (No 71), replacing drug-eluting stents No 4). Available at http://www.nice.org.uk, 2004.

Page 16: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

The application of many of drugs in stenting was abandon because its use revealed harmfull or too weak clinical results.

These drugs prevent the excessive cellular proliferation of the injured tissues that results in in-stent restenosis(17).

Drug eluting lasts at least one year, period of special vulnerability for restenosis.

(17) Ryan, J., Cohen, D. J.. Are drug-eluting Stents Cost-Effective?: It Depends on Whom You Ask. Circulation 2006; 114: 1736-1744

Page 17: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

The target artery is <3mm in calibre (internal diameter);

The lesion is >15mm longer.

Use of DES is recommended when: (18)

(18)Sigmund S. et al. Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Disease – The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for European Society for Cardiology. European Heart Journal. 2005. 26, 804-847.

Page 18: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

Small vessels;Chronic total occlusions;Bifurcational/ostial lesions;Bypass stenoses;Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus;Multi-vessel disease;Unprotected left main stenosis;In-stent restenosis.

Situations requiring further evidence-based evaluation: (11)

(11)Sigmund S. et al. Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Disease – The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for European Society for Cardiology. European Heart Journal. 2005. 26, 804-847.

Page 19: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

DES are generally 3 to 4 times more expensive than BMS. (19)

If DES considerably reduce the number of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery (especially patients with multi-vessels disease and/or diabetes mellitus), there will be a significant reduction of cost in medical care(16).

(16) NICE (National Institute for Clinical Excellence), Coronary artery stents (No 71), replacing Drug-eluting stents No 4). Available at http://www.nice.org.uk, 2004.(19) Ryan, J., Cohen, D. J.. Are drug-eluting Stents Cost-Effective?: It Depends on Whom You Ask. Circulation 2006; 114: 1736-1744

Page 20: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

Although there is a support for better outcome with the implantation of stents rather than balloon angioplasty alone(20), studies are inconclusive about advantage on the application of drug-eluting stents rather than uncoated ones.

(20)Spaulding C., et al. Sirolimus-Eluting versus Uncoated Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction. N Eng J Med 2006; 355:1093-1104

Page 21: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

To investigate whether routine use of drug-eluting stents rather than uncoated stents reduces mortality and improves clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary artery disease.

Aim of the Aim of the study:study:

Page 22: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

Systematic review Systematic review searching in medical searching in medical databases:databases:

PubMed’s; Cochrane’s online database.

Searching  criteria:Searching  criteria: From the earliest article available until our data acquisition.

MethodsMethods

Page 23: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

Pubmed’s QueryPubmed’s Query("Myocardial Infarction"[MeSH] OR "acute coronary artery disease" OR "acute coronary syndrome" OR "obstructive coronary artery disease" OR "myocardial infarction" OR "coronary artery disease" OR "unstable angina") AND ("uncoated stents" OR "bare metal stents" OR " drug-eluting stents" OR "sirolimus" OR "rapamycin" OR "paclitaxel" OR "taxol" OR "taxane") NOT (review OR letter)

Page 24: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

("Myocardial Infarction" OR "acute coronary artery disease" OR "acute coronary syndrome" OR "obstructive coronary artery disease" OR "myocardial infarction" OR "coronary artery disease" OR "unstable angina") AND ("uncoated stents" OR "bare metal stents" OR " drug-eluting stents" OR "sirolimus" OR "rapamycin" OR "paclitaxel" OR "taxol" OR "taxane")                                       

Cochrane’s Cochrane’s QueryQuery

Page 25: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

Performed by four groups, composed of three reviewers, according to the exclusion criteria mentioned below:

1. Articles not written in english, portuguese, spanish or

french.

2. Not randomized controlled trials

3. Articles which don’t mention the methods used and

results.

4. Articles that don´t compare clinical outcomes of drug-

eluting stents with uncoated ones in acute coronary

artery disease

5. Test subjects non human.

Initial tracing (exclusion):Initial tracing (exclusion):

Page 26: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

• performed by four group, composed of three reviewers.

• inclusion of the article is dependent on the approval of at least two of the three elements of each group, bearing in mind the inclusion criteria set.

Inclusion criteria:Inclusion criteria:

Page 27: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

1. Directly related to the review’s main subject.Clinical outcomes of drug-eluting stents versus uncoated stents in acute coronary artery disease.

2. Compare drug-eluting stents with uncoated ones in which concerns the percutaneous coronary intervention where they are used.

3. Should have a minimum “n” (sample size) of one hundred individuals.

4. The endpoints of the included article must include death or acute myocardial infartion.

5. The studies have to have a follow-up period of at least 6 months

6. The articles have to have data about relative risk or odds ratio or mean difference for one or more of the endpoints (or have enough data to allow them to be calculated).

Inclusion criteria:Inclusion criteria:

Page 28: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

Mortality and composite endpoint of death and myocardial infarction.

Major adverse cardiac events, restenosis rate, late loss of arterial lumen diameter.

Bleeding complications needing blood transfusion or surgery.

OutcomesOutcomes::

Page 29: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Drug-eluting vs uncoated stents

(21) Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized controlled clinical trials. Control clinical trials. 1996; 17: 1-12.

Quality evaluation of the selected articles(21):

•Random allocation

•Blinding

•Blinded outcome assessment

•Full description of all losses of follow-up and withdrawals

•Loss of follow-up

An aditional point is given if:

Randomization is concealed

Double blinding appropriate

Utilization of the Jadad scoring system

According to this quality scale, 1 point is given for each of the following items:

Page 30: Medical Faculty of Oporto University Biostathistic  and Medical Informatics Department

Turma Turma 7 7

Ana Carvalho Gustavo Vidal

Ana Menezes Inês Teles

Ana Amado Jaime Rodrigues

Bruno Mendes Marta Costa

Diana Santos Sara Camões

Érico Costa Tiago Rodrigues