medical / surgical management of hip fractures · medical / surgical management of hip fractures...

38
Medical / Surgical Management of Hip Fractures NEBGEC Frail Elderly and Geriatric Syndromes July 16-17, 2009 Chad W. Vokoun, M.D., FACP Assistant Professor Associate Program Director Department of Internal Medicine University of Nebraska Medical Center

Upload: dinhdiep

Post on 05-Jun-2018

233 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Medical / Surgical Management of Hip Fractures

NEBGEC Frail Elderly and Geriatric SyndromesJuly 16-17, 2009

Chad W. Vokoun, M.D., FACPAssistant Professor

Associate Program DirectorDepartment of Internal Medicine

University of Nebraska Medical Center

• I have no commercial or financial conflicts of interest to disclose.

Case

• 87 y.o. female presents following a fall while getting out of a car this morning. She arrived by squad and has been evaluated by the ED staff. X-rays show a minimally displaced femoral neck fracture. Her history is significant for DMII, CAD (MI four years ago –medical management), and HTN. She lives independently but receives help with day to day activities from her daughter who lives nearby

Overview

• Scope, severity and complexity of hip fractures

• Urgent preoperative evaluation

• Timing of surgery

• Pre, peri, postoperative care

• Co-management model

Scope, Severity, Complexity

• 11 million falls / year

• Complications - $20 billion / year

• 320-350,000 hip fractures / year

• $6-8 billion / year

• 90% aged 65 or older

• 76% are female

Presenter
Presentation Notes
1 out of 3 elderly adults fall annually

Scope, Severity, Complexity

• Mortality– 11-23% at 6 months

– 22-29% at one year

• Morbidity– 60% - regain prefracture walking ability

– 50% - regain prefracture ADLs ability

Presenter
Presentation Notes
1 out of 3 elderly adults fall annually

Scope, Severity, Complexity

• Co-morbid conditions – Cardiac risk factors

– Diabetes

– Osteoporosis

– Delirium

– Functional status

Presenter
Presentation Notes
1 out of 3 elderly adults fall annually

Pre-operative Assessment

• Historically done by Primary Care, Anesthesiologists, Cardiologists, Pulmonologists

• Co-management has become popular• Many assessment tools exist (ASA, ACC/AHA,

Lee index)

Pre-operative Assessment

• Who needs assessment?

• JCAH require H&P within 30 days

• UNMC Surgical Co-Management inclusion criteria:- DM I/II -CHF -CAD / Risk

- Anticoagulation -Obesity -COPD/Asthma

- Immunosuppressed -TIA/Stroke -CRI

- Dementia -IBD -Liver disease

- ETOH abuse -Rheum

Pre-operative Assessment

• Labs – No definitive recommendations

• CXR – Smokers > 50 years old

• EKG – Based on risk

• PFT – No good evidence – Pneumonia Risk Index

• Overall must obey Hospital or Anesthesia requirements but should approach each patient independently

Pre-operative Assessment

• If no specific question – overall assessment

• Risk stratify not “clear”– Type of surgery / urgency

– Type of anesthesia

– Co-morbid conditions

• Optimize medical condition

Pre-operative Assessment

• Prevention of known complications– Prosthetic heart valves

– DVT

– Endocarditis

– Surgical wound infections

– Reactive airway disease

– HTN

– Glucose control

– ETOH Use

– Adrenal insufficiency

Pre-operative Assessment

• Pre-operative medications– Anti-platelet agents

• Controversy - ASA

– Diabetic meds

– HTN / Anti-arrhythmia meds

– Steroids

– Rheumatologic meds• Immunomodulators

• Methotrexate

Glycemic Control – Pre-op

• Hold oral hypoglycemic meds am of surgery– Metformin pm before as well

• Half dose of am insulin (long and short)

• Glargine (Lantus) – Full dose PM before

• Frequent monitoring before and during

Pre-operative Assessment

High

(cardiac risk > 5%)

Emergent major operations, particularly in elderly

Aortic and other major vascular surgery

Peripheral vascular surgery

Anticipated prolonged surgical procedures

associated with large fluid shifts

Intermediate

(cardiac risk <5%)

Carotid endarterectomy

Head and Neck surgery

Intraperitoneal / Intrathoracic surgery

Orthopaedic surgery

Prostate surgery

Low

(cardiac risk <1%)

Endoscopic procedures

Superficial procedures

Cataract surgery

Breast surgery

Surgical Risk

Clinical risk factors include ischemic heart disease, compensated or prior heart failure, diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, and cerebrovascular disease.

Perioperative CV Risk

• Peri / Post-operative MI well documented

• Timing 0-72 hours following

• 21-24% mortality

• Tachycardia, catecholamine driven

• Hypothermia, anemia also implicated

• Often silent

Perioperative Beta-Blockers

• Known to decrease myocardial oxygen demand

• Well known benefit with CV disease / CV surgery

• Now - controversial data for non-CV surgery and patients with risk factors

• Large retrospective cohort study NEJM

Perioperative Beta-BlockersRevised Cardiac Risk Index

• High risk surgery– Intrathoracic, intraperitoneal, supra-inguinal

vascular

• History of ischemic heart disease

• History of CHF

• History of cerebrovascular disease

• Diabetes mellitus

• Renal Insufficiency – Cr >2.0

Perioperative Beta-Blockers

• More information to come

• For now………– High risk patients

– Multiple risk factors (2 or more)

– Earlier is better

– Titrate

– Avoid hypotension and bradycardia

– CLOSE monitoring of pain, sepsis, etc

Obstructive Sleep Apnea

• Under recognized

• Potential for severe complications– Hypercapnea

• Treatment very effective

Timing of Surgery

• 24-48 hours

• Unstable patient – 72 hours

• Cochrane review

Post-operative Visit

• Review procedure notes

• Resume pre-op meds

• Pulmonary treatment

• Pain control

• Anticoagulation / Thromboprophylaxis

• Transfusion threshold

• HTN, DM control, Confusion, etc

Glycemic Control - Goals

• Data shows general medical / surgical – Fasting 90-126 mg/dl

– Random < 180 mg/dl

• Individualized treatment OK

• Caution to avoid hypoglycemia

• NO SSI

Glycemic Control – Post-op

• Minimum AC / HS monitoring

• Resume Insulin as previous

• Fluids depending on scenario

• Resume oral meds when PO resumed

• Supplemental insulin – protocol – Educational tool

• If any difficulty or prolonged variance in oral intake:– IV insulin

IV Insulin - Advantages

• Great outcomes data– Morbidity / Mortality / LOS / Wound Healing

• Protocol driven

• Low risk of hypoglycemia

• Adapts to changes in PO intake / TF / TPN

• Diagnostic tool

IV Insulin - Disadvantages

• Frequent monitoring

• Safety

• Transition difficulties

• Confusing to patients

IV Insulin – ACE Position Statement

• Critical illness

• Prolonged NPO - DM

• Perioperative period

• After organ transplantation

• TPN

• Elevated B.S. with high dose glucocorticoids

• CVA

• Labor and Delivery

• Dose finding strategy

• Other illnesses requiring prompt glycemic control

IV Insulin

• When coming off drip– Initiate PO meds and insulin regimen

– Use total infused over 24 hours on IV

– Keep in mind diet and current condition

– Minimum 2 hours

– In complicated patients up to 24 hours

COPD / Asthma

• Anesthesia has many effects on lung function– Decreases response to hypercapnea / hypoxemia

– Atelectasis

• Pulmonary complications– Extends LOS

– Pneumonia

COPD / Asthma

• Smokers alone – 2 fold increase

• Quit > 6 months back to baseline

• FEV1 < 40% - 6 fold increase

• Asthma OK if FEV1 > 80%

COPD / Asthma

• Tobacco cessation – 6 months

• Incentive spirometry / lung expansion– Before and after

• Bronchodilators

Anticoagulation / Thromboprophylaxis

• 50% will clot without

• 1.4-7.5% fatal PE without

• Pharmacologic– Warfarin, Heparin, LMWH, Fondaparinux

• Mechanical devices

• Timing – 10-14 days

Discharge Planning

• Primary Care

• PT/OT

• Skilled Nursing / Rehab

• MORE TO FOLLOW…….

Prevention

• Proper screening / treatment of osteoporosis

• Vision / hearing testing

• Medication review / ETOH

• Balance / gait / strength training

• Home safety inspection

Co-Management Model

• UNMC

• Practice patterns

• Communication

• Research purposes

References• Rao, SS, Cherukuri, M. Management of Hip Fracture: The Family Physician’s Role. American

Family Physician 2006; 73(12) 2195-2200.• Hip Fractures Among Older Adults. CDC.gov factsheets• Haleem S. Mortality following hip fracture: trends and geographical variations over the last

40 years. Injury 2008; 39(10) 1157-63.• Medical consultation for patients with hip fractures. UpToDate.• Conservative Versus Operative Treatment for Hip Fractures in Adults, Cochrane Review 2009• Ja ̈rvinen, T. Shifting the focus in fracture prevention from osteoporosis to falls. BMJ 2008;

336, 124-126.• Medocina TMS, et al. Evaluation of the health-related quality of life in elderly patients

according to the type of hip fracture: femoral neck or trochanteric. Clinics 2008;63(5) 607-612.

• ACC / AHA guidelines for preoperative risk assesment• AACE / ADA consensus statement on inpatient treatment of hyperglycemia

References• Douglas, CB, et al. Perioperative diabetic and hyperglycemic management issues. Critical Care

Medicine 2004; 32S:116-125.• American College of Endocrinology Position Statement on inpatient Diabetes and Metabolic

Control. Endocrine Practice 2004; 10: 77-82.• Hoogwerf, BJ. Perioperative management of diabetes mellitus. Cleveland Clinic Journal of

Medicine 2006; 73: s95-s99.• Van Den Berghe, G, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. New England

Journal of Medicine, 2001; 345:1359-1367.• Moritoki, E, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in postoperative intensive care unit patients.

American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Medicine, 2006; 173:407-413.• Furnary, AP. Continuous insulin infusion reduces mortality in patients with diabetes

undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Journal of Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery, 2003;125:1007-1021.

• Gore, DC. Association of hyperglycemia with increased mortality after severe burn injury. Journal of Trauma, 2001;51:540-544.

• Malmberg, K. Prospective randomized study of intensive insulin treatment on long term survival after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus. British Medical Journal, 1997;314:1512