medically complex patients (mcp) webinar theories of change onil bhattacharyya, md, phd frigon-blau...

30
Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College Hospital University of Toronto Gary Naglie, MD Hunt Family Chair in Geriatric Medicine, Baycrest Health Sciences University of Toronto October 27, 2014

Upload: myra-french

Post on 29-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

Medically Complex Patients (MCP) WebinarTheories of Change

Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhDFrigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine

Research, Women’s College HospitalUniversity of Toronto

Gary Naglie, MDHunt Family Chair in Geriatric

Medicine, Baycrest Health SciencesUniversity of Toronto

October 27, 2014

Page 2: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

2

1. Recognize the maturity and complexity of your models and how this impacts the key goals for your project

2. Introduce the concept of theory of impact as a starting point for thinking about your models

3. Provide a framework to test key aspects of your model and identify opportunities for improvement

OBJECTIVES

Page 3: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

PROJECT MATURITY – SETTING THE RIGHT GOALS

• Developing new program• Major modification to existing

project• Minor modification to existing

project• Scale up/replication

3

Page 4: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

Kaiser Permanente Innovation Consultancy 4

“If things are fundamentally working in your system, then you are operating in the world of improvement. ”

“If you fundamentally believe that what you have is broken, then you are operating in the world of innovation.” 

Page 5: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

5

Features Improvement

Typical problem

Improve uptake of hand washing

Goal How to deliver service better

Parameters Clear user and outcome

Strategy Iterative, tests of smaller breadth

Innovation

Improve access for frail elderly

Develop the appropriate service

Tentative solution, user and outcome

Iterative, tests of larger breadth

IMPROVEMENT VS. INNOVATION

Page 6: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

Developing a Theory of Impact

Why might your intervention work?

Page 7: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

7

THEORY OF IMPACT

1. Problem – Something important but also manageable

2. Solution (intervention/mechanism) – A target group, a provider and a mechanism to address problem

3. Outcomes – Key outcomes that can be attributed to solution (shorter- and longer term)

Page 8: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

8

THEORY OF IMPACT - COPD

1. Problem – COPD is a major cause of readmissions and COPD action plans are rarely used

2. Solution (intervention/mechanism) – Nurse case managers can increase self-management and use of action plans

3. Outcomes - Symptom scores, ED visits and hospitalizations,

Page 9: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

THEORY OF IMPACT - ICCT

1. Problem – Growing frail senior population receive fragmented care that is expensive and does not meet their needs

2. Solution (intervention/mechanism) – Integrated primary, community and specialty care outreach service providing intensive case management and coordinated care across transitions

3. Outcomes – Better care experience, smoother transitions, reduced health care utilization

9

Page 10: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

Original Model:Baycrest Community Outreach Team (COT)

10

Frail Older Adult/Caregiver

Referring Community Primary

Care Physicians

• Consultation

Community Outreach Team

Page 11: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

New Model:The Integrated Community Care Team (ICCT)

Integration at the Point of Care

Frail Older Adult/Caregiver

Community “Solo” Primary Care Physicians

COT + COE + NP AcuteHospital

CCACIntensive Case

Managers + Pharmacist

• Consultation• Shared Care• Assumed Primary Care

Page 12: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

Testing Key Hypotheses About Your Program

Page 13: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

13

• Most programs have many untested elements related

• May relate to target group, intervention or context

• Articulating assumptions and testing them will help you find and fix problems early on

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?

Page 14: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

14

KEY CHALLENGES FOR CARE INTEGRATION PROJECTS

• Difficulty implementing• Slow recruitment• Poor fit between between

intervention and target population not identified or modified

• Success rate <40% in well-conducted studies

• Variable results when replicated

Page 15: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

15

INTEGRATION EXISTS ALONG A CONTINUUM

 

2-Way Communication

 

Joint Care Delivery

 

Joint Management Across

Institutions

Engagement 

Communication & Behaviour

 

Culture & Policy

Low Medium High

Common Strategies

Common Challenges

Page 16: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

Adapted From: Blank, S. Harvard Business Review, May 2013.

User Discovery

User Validation

Recruitment Program Building

Search Execution

Change user or intervention

16

FINDING THE RIGHT PATIENTS, BUILDING THE RIGHT PROGRAM

Page 17: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

17

TESTING HYPOTHESES AT EACH STEP

• Feasibility of Implementation• Recruitment of patients• Recruitment of providers• Intervention• Outcomes

Page 18: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

FEASIBILITY OF IMPLEMENTATION

• Hiring staff – clerical, providers, managers• Organizational support• Data sharing • Divergent institutional processes • Governance

18

Page 19: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

ICCT EXAMPLE: IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES

• Hiring staff

• Data sharing

• Divergent institutional processes

• Governance

19

Page 20: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

20

PATIENT RECRUITMENT

• Why would patients join?• Which patients will benefit?• Are there enough patients?• Are referral mechanisms effective?• Will patients show up?• Are the people who are being

referred different than expected?

Page 21: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

21

PROVIDER RECRUITMENT

• What is the benefit for providers?• Is it easy to join or refer patients?• Consider steps in adoption

Enrollment First use Regular use

Page 22: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

22

ICCT EXAMPLE: PATIENTS AND PROVIDERS

• Are people referred different than those being targeted? Yes – not all require in-home

assessment • Is it easy to refer patients?

Not from community docs perspective

Page 23: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

23

INTERVENTION

• Is the intervention doable?• Are the elements of the

intervention working?• If reaching the target group, does

the intervention meet their needs?• Are there any missing

components?

Page 24: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

24

ICCT EXAMPLE: FEATURES OF INTERVENTION

• Are elements of the intervention working? Consultation stream and shared care

require adjustments in hand-off and communication

• Are there any missing components? Over 50% of referrals from Central LHIN

Page 25: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

25

• Do the outcomes match the maturity of the model?

• Are the outcomes appropriate given the mechanism of the intervention?

• Are the outcomes appropriate given the target patients?

ICCT EXAMPLE: OUTCOMES

Page 26: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

ICCT EXAMPLE: OUTCOMES

• Do the outcomes match the maturity of the model? Premature to focus on health care

utilization Focus on patient and care provider

experience• Are the outcomes appropriate given the

target patients? Add quality end-of-life care

26

Page 27: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

27

Use questions to inform yourself about how various parts of your project are working

Systematic review of quality improvement studies found that less than 20% documented changes through iteration or used monthly cycles

ITERATION IS HARD WORK

If you’re worried about your model, you will test it!

BMJ Quality and Safety, Taylor MJ et al 2013

Page 28: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

28

“The real measure of success is the number of experiments that can be crowded into twenty-four

hours”Thomas Edison

Page 29: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

29

CONCLUSIONS

1. Models are at varying levels of maturity and levels of complexity

2. Start from a high-level theory of impact

3. Drill down and test all of the aspects of your model to identify opportunities for improvement

4. This will help you find the right patients and build the right program

Page 30: Medically Complex Patients (MCP) Webinar Theories of Change Onil Bhattacharyya, MD, PhD Frigon-Blau Chair in Family Medicine Research, Women’s College

Questions