meeting the language demands of english language learners through reading in the content areas naomi...
TRANSCRIPT
Meeting the Language Demands of English Language Learners
through Reading in the Content Areas
Naomi M. Watkins
Kristen M. Lindahl
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Overview
• What are language demands?• Why identify & address language
demands in the content areas?• What are the areas of language that
should be addressed?• How do I identify the language demands of
the texts I use & the lessons I teach?• How do I address these language
demands in my lessons?
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
What are Language Demands?
• The amount and kind of English needed to understand and participate in content area lessons (Harper & de Jong, 2004)
• May be mistaken for the integrated language processes:– Speaking– Listening– Reading– Writing
• The 4 language processes are the way students participate and communicate; language demands are the types of language at various levels of difficulty that present themselves daily in school
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Why Identify & Address Language Demands?
• It may take ELLs 5-10 years to acquire academic language proficiency (Collier, 1987; Cummins, 2001).
• Schools should provide language support to students while they are learning academic subjects (Diaz-Rico & Weed, 2006).
• Research-supported models of instruction for ELLs include both content and language objectives (Chamot & O’Malley, 1996; Echevarria, Vogt & Short, 2004; Dong, 2005).
• Incorporating language objectives may be difficult for content-area teachers (Short & Echevarria, 1999).
• Language is sometimes an “invisible medium” (Diaz-Rico & Weed, 2006).
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009 Andrews, 2008
Teacher Language Awareness
• Knowledge of language– Language proficiency– Language competency
• Knowledge about language– Grammatical terminology– Language forms– Semantic understanding– Syntax– Pragmatics– Phonology
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Six Areas of Language Prevalent in Content Area Lessons
1. Reading Comprehension
2. Writing
3. Vocabulary
4. Functional/Formulaic Language
5. Word Study
6. Grammar & Conventions
Lindahl & Watkins, 2007
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Reading Comprehension
Def: Process of constructing meaning from text
Examples: • Activating & building background knowledge• Text structure (organization, content features,
graphic features)• Figurative language• Summarizing• Inferencing
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Writing
Def: Using written language to respond to typically recurring situations
Examples:• Orthography• Writing Process
– Prewriting: Purpose, Audience, Genre, Stance, Media/Design
• Six Traits
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Vocabulary
Def: Bodies of words students need in order to comprehend and express content knowledge and information
Examples:• New words that represent known concepts• New words representing new concepts• Clarifying and enriching the meanings of
known words• Idioms• Abstract high-frequency words • Context clues
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Functional/Formulaic Language
Def: Language formulae that students can use in context to accomplish a task
Examples:• Talking about past/future events• Asking for information through questioning• Talking about self• Describing things• Expressing opinions
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Word Study
Def: Instruction about words rather than focusing on the meaning of words
Examples:• Prefixes, roots, and suffixes (Word structure)• Word patterns: sound, visual, and meaning
patterns• Compound words• Cognates• Homophones
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Grammar/Conventions
Def: How a language is constructed; rules of acceptable writing and language practices
Examples:• Contractions• Paragraphing• Capitalization • Singular vs. plural• Subject-verb agreement
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
How to Identify Language Demands: Modeling the Process
1. Sample B-D-A Lesson Plan for Science
2. Organizer for Identifying Language Demands
3. Practice Identifying Language Demands for a text and for a lesson/activity
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Sample Lesson Plan
• Content Area: Science
• Topic: 3 States of & Conversion of Matter
• Content Objectives: – SWBAT identify characteristics of the three
types of matter by completing a graphic organizer in pairs.
– SWBAT compare and contrast the three types of matter by writing a paragraph independently.
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Lesson Plan: Before Reading
• Simulation: Place several ice cubes into a thin glass container. Ask/remind students that they represent solid matter.
• Add heat to the ice cubes until they melt and become water. Ask/remind students that this now represents liquid matter.
• Place a balloon over the tube. Add more heat so that the water evaporates and forms gas. As this happens, the balloon should inflate. Ask/remind students that this now represents gas.
• Inform students that their purpose for reading is to learn the three states of matter and how matter changes.
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Lesson Plan: During Reading
Pairs Reading• Find a partner.• One student will be the coach. The other student will be the
reader.• Both students read the 1st paragraph silently.• After reading the 1st paragraph, the reader summarizes the
paragraph for the coach. The coach asks clarifying questions.
• Students then reverse roles, read the next paragraph silently, and the reader then summarizes for the coach with the coach asking questions.
• The process continues until the entire article has been read and summarized.
• Once the entire article is read, the students cooperatively summarize the main idea of the passage.
Billmeyer & Barton, 1998
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Lesson Plan: After Reading
After Reading: Graphic OrganizerStates of MatterState
ofMatter
Shape Volume ParticleSpeed
Types orUnique
Characteristics
Write or Draw anExample
Solid
Liquid
Gas
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Lesson Plan: Writing
• Student Prompt: – Using your completed graphic organizer as
a guide, compose a paragraph comparing and contrasting the three states of matter: 1. Solid
2. Liquid
3. Gas
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
How to Identify Language Demands: Practice
• When examining text and/or planning lessons and activities, ask:
What language will my students need in order to read this text
and/or participate in this lesson or activity?
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
How to Identify Language Demands: An Organizer
Demands of the TextDemands of the Lesson/Activities
Reading Comprehension
Writing
Functional Language
Vocabulary
Word Study
Grammar/ Conventions
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
You Try!
1. Identify the language demands for the text.
2. Then, identify the language demands for the after reading portion (graphic organizer & writing prompt) of the lesson.
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Reading Comprehension
For the Text• Background
Knowledge• Headers• Italics of vocabulary• Figures & captions
For the Activity• Isolate key ideas • Summarize/
Paraphrase
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Writing
For the GO:
• Organizing ideas (prioritizing)
For the paragraph:
• Topic sentences
• Concluding sentences
• Use of examples
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Vocabulary
For the Text• Content obligatory:
matter, gas, liquid, solid, particles, viscosity, substance, spherical, condensation
• Content compatible: fixed, definite, overcome, tension, volume, state
For the Activity• On the GO: Shape,
volume, particle speed, types or unique characteristics
• To complete GO: crystalline, amorphous, surface tension, viscocity
• To write paragraph: All of the aforementioned vocabulary words
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Functional/Formulaic Language
For the Text• Commands
(imperatives) in the experiments
• Ordinal numbers (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, …)
For the Activity• Compare/Contrast
language– Similar/ Dissimilar– Alike/Different– In contrast– In addition– But– While– And, also, too
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Word Study
For the Text
• -tion words– Condensation– Sublimation
• Amorphous
• Crystalline
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Grammar/Conventions
For the Text• Celsius, Fahrenheit, &
milliliter abbreviations• Numbered steps on
directions
For the activity• Commas used in a list
of items• Indenting • Capitalization • Present tense verbs
– To be– To change– To have– To stay or to remain
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
How to Target Your Instruction to Address Identified Language Demands
1. Select a text and an existing lesson/activity
2. Identify the language demands of the text and the lesson/activity
3. Prioritize demands based on students’ needs
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
How to Target (Continued)
4. Target the lesson by:• Adding• Subtracting• Refining To the presentation portion of your lesson
based on prioritized needs5. Write language objectives that complement
content objectives—communicate both to students
6. Provide explicit instruction on prioritized demands embedded within the context of the lesson
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Concluding Thoughts
• Vital for ELL students that content area teachers always consider content and language when planning instruction
• Remember that there is more to language than the four processes
• Instruction in the various areas of language should be made transparent to students
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
References
• Andrews, S. J. (2008). Teacher language awareness. In J. Cenoz & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.) Encyclopedia of language and education, 2nd ed, 6, 287-298. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media LLC.
• Billmeyer, R., & Barton, M. L. (1998). Teaching reading in the content areas: If not me, then who? Aurora, CO: Mid-continental Research for Education and Learning.
• Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1996). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A model for linguistically diverse classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 96(3), 259-273.
• Collier, V. (1987). Age and rate of acquisition of second language for academic purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 21(4), 10-34.
• Cummins, J. (2001). Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society. Ontario, CA: California Association for Bilingual Education (CABE).
• Diaz-Rico,L.T. & Weed, K.Z. (2006). The crosscultural, language, and academic development handbook. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
• Dong, Y. (2005). Getting at the content. Educational Leadership, 62(4), 14-19.• Echevarria, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D. J. (2004). Making content comprehensible for English
learners: The SIOP model. Boston: Pearson.• Harper, C., & de Jong, E. (2004). Misconceptions about teaching English language learners.
Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(2), 152-162.• Lindahl, K. M. & Watkins, N. M. (2007). Language objective menu. Unpublished manuscript.• Short, D., & Echevarria, J. (1999). The sheltered instruction
observation protocol. (Educational Practice Report 3). Santa Cruz, CA & Washington, DC: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence. Available: www.cal.org/resources/digest/sheltered.html
Watkins & Lindahl, 2009
Contact Information
• Naomi Watkins– [email protected]
• Kristen Lindahl– [email protected]
Slides will be available on the IRA website to download.