metallurgy of casting

Upload: mvjayaram007

Post on 03-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Metallurgy of Casting

    1/12

    METALLURGY OF CASTING

    Prof. B. S. MurtyDepartment of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering

    IIT Madras

    Thermodynam!" and #net!" of So$df!aton:

    The higher entropy of liquid in comparison to the solid causes the free energy of the liquid to

    decrease at a higher rate than the solid with increase in temperature. This leads to a situation

    of lower free energy for the liquid above the melting point and a lower free energy for the

    solid below the melting point. This gives the driving force for the solidification of a liquid

    below its melting point.

    Solidification and Grain Size Strengthening

    Stages of Solidification Nucleation: occurs when a small piece of solid forms in the liquid

    and must attain a minimum critical size before it is stable

    Growth: occurs as atoms from the liquid are attached to the tinysolid until no liquid remains

    Both conditions are met when the free energy of the particularphase is lower

    F%. &Driving force for the solidification below the melting point

    However this driving force is opposed by the increase in energy due to the creation of a new

    solid!liquid interface during solidification. In fact this is the reason for the usually observed

    "in" in the cooling curve during solidification which is termed as undercooling.

  • 8/12/2019 Metallurgy of Casting

    2/12

    Cooling Curves

    F%. '#ooling curves during solidification

    $ssuming that solid phase nucleates as spherical %clusters& of radius r it can be shown that

    the net 'e(cess) free energy change for a single nucleus G'r)is given by:

    where *+is the solid,liquid interfacial energy.

    F%. (-ucleation barrier during solidification

  • 8/12/2019 Metallurgy of Casting

    3/12

    *olving the above equation for the overall free energy minimiation one can get the critical

    radius r/ 'defined as the radius at which G'r) is ma(imum) for the formation of the solid

    nucleus which can further grow to complete the solidification.

    The associated energy barrier to nucleation G/ is found by substituting r/ into the overall

    free energy e(pression.

    It s important to note the temperature!dependence of these terms i.e. that r/ 0,Tand G/

    0,T1. This is the basis for obtaining fine grain microstructure on fast cooling. 2ast cooling

    leads to higher undercooling which gives raise to finer nuclei and high nucleation rate

    causing the formation of large number of fine grains.

    Ca"t M!ro"tru!ture)

    During casting solidification generally starts on the mould surface leading to the formation

    of distinct microstructural domains such as chilled crystals columnar grains and finally the

    coarse equia(ed grain structure at the centre of the casting as shown in 2ig. 3.

    Casting or Ingot Structure

    F%. *#ast microstructure

    Different types of microstructures can develop in the casting depending on the temperature

    gradient ahead of the liquid!solid interface and the growth velocity of the interface. These are

    classified as planar cellular and dendritic interfaces as shown in 2ig. 4. $t very slow growth

    rate and high gradients planar interface is stabilied '2ig. 5). The formation of dendritic

    microstructure has to be suppressed particularly in directional solidification and one

  • 8/12/2019 Metallurgy of Casting

    4/12

    refining where compositional segregation is intended to be minimied. $ dendritic

    microstructure can lead to microsegregation and microporosity.

    Growth Interfaces

    Growth of Interfaces depends on

    Concentration Gradient

    emperature Gradient

    undercooling

    Growth !ate

    ypes of Interfaces

    "lanar

    Cellular

    #endritic

    $quia%ed

    F%. +Types of microstructures developed during soldification

    Schematic Illustration of

    Solidification &orphologies

    F%. ,Effect of temperature gradient 6 and growth velocity 7 on the microstrctures

  • 8/12/2019 Metallurgy of Casting

    5/12

    So$df!aton of a "n%$e -ha"e A$$oy

    $ single phase alloy as shown in 2ig. 8 solidifies usually by the nucleation and growth of

    solid solution in the liquid. The cooling curve for such a solidification process is shown in

    2ig. 9. The nucleation and growth of dendrites in such an alloy is shown in 2ig. .

    F%. *olidification of a solid solution

    Solidification Simulation

    'Growth of Solutal #endrites: ( Cellular (utomation &odel and Its )uantitative Capabilities*+ ,- Beltran.Sanchezand #-&- Stefanescu+ Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A + /olume 01(+ 2eb- 3440+ p- 056 .073

    F%. /-ucleation ad growth of dendrites during solidification of a single phase alloy

    The freeing range which is the temperature difference between the liquidus and solidus

    controls to a large e(tent formation of mushy one 'mi(ture of liquid and solid) during

    solidification which leads to the microsegregation and microshrin"age,microporosity. +ong

    freeing range alloys are those alloys which have large difference between the liquidus and

    solidus causing e(tensive microsegregation,microporosity as shown in 2ig. 0;. In addition

    fast cooling 'non!equilibrium cooling) can also lead to another segregation pattern called

    coring as shown in 2ig. 00.

    $quilibrium Solidification of aSolid Solution (lloy

    Cooling Curve

    F%. 0#ooling curve for the solidification of

    single phase alloy

  • 8/12/2019 Metallurgy of Casting

    6/12

    F%. &1Effect of freeing range on shrin"age

    Gran Refnement

    It is well "nown that metals and alloys usually solidify with coarse columnar grain

    structure under normal casting conditions unless the mode of solidification is carefully

    controlled. It is possible to develop fine equia(ed grains in as cast structure either by raising

    the number of nucleation sites or by grain multiplication. 6rain refinement has been defined

    as deliberate suppression of columnar grain growth in the ingots and castings and formation

    of fine equia(ed solidification structure throughout the material. 2ig. 01 shows an e(ample of

    conversion of coarse columnar grain structure to fine equia(ed structure by the addition of

    ;.;0

  • 8/12/2019 Metallurgy of Casting

    7/12

    The interest in grain refinement stems from the fact that the mechanical properties of

    any metal or alloy component are greatly enhanced with fine grain sie. It is now proved

    beyond doubt that the fine equia(ed grain structure imparts high yield strength high

    toughness good e(trudability and uniform distribution of second phase and microporosity on

    a fine scale resulting in improved machinability good surface finish resistance to hot tearing

    and various other desirable properties.

    ?hen the grain refiner is added to the melt it ta"es some time for the nucleating sites to

    show their full potency 'i.e. the grain sie reaches a minimum which is commonly referred

    to as ultimate grain size). The time required to reach ultimate grain sie is normally referred

    to as optimum contact time. $ grain refiner is called fast acting if the optimum contact time is

    very short and is called slow acting otherwise. $n ideal grain refiner would be that which is

    not only fast acting but also shows no or insignificant fading till long holding time 'long

    lasting). 2ig. 0@ shows the photomacrographs of aluminium grain refined with such an ideal

    grain refiner which gives fine equia(ed grains within 1min and whose potency is not lost

    even after 01;min of holding the melt after the addition of grain refiner.

    Grain refining efficiency can be defined as the efficiency of the grain refiner in

    converting the coarse columnar grain structure to a fine equia(ed one. Hence while

    comparing the grain refining efficiency of any two grain refiners the one that gives lower

    grain sie of $l for the same addition level can be considered as having higher grain refining

    efficiency. Holding the melt beyond the optimum contact time usually leads to an increase in

    the grain sie which is referred to as fading. 2ading could be either due to the dissolution of

    the nucleating sites and,or their settling or floating due to their higher or lower density

    respectively with respect to the melt. ?hen an $l alloy containing certain alloying elements

    such as #r Ar +i and high amounts of *i is grain refined with a conventional grain refiner

    such as $l!4Ti!0= master alloy at the usual addition level of ;.;0

  • 8/12/2019 Metallurgy of Casting

    8/12

    molten aluminium with o(ides thermal reduction and electrolysis melting of elemental

    blends mechanical alloying and rapid solidification processing. $mong the above techniques

    the one involving the reaction of halide salts such as B1Ti25and B=23with molten $l has

    become quite popular. $ clean melt with good control on the alloy composition is usually

    achieved by this technique. However the nature of reaction between the salts and molten $l

    was not "nown till recently e(cepting that it is highly e(othermic.Cecent detailed studieshave shown that the overall reaction could be e(pressed as follows.

    01$l F @GB1Ti25 F 1GB=23 1GTi$l@ F GTi=1 F 4GB$l23 F B@$l25

    $ttempts have been made in the past to achieve fine equia(ed grain structure in as!cast

    $l alloys by small additions of a number of elements li"e Ti = Ar -b 7 ? Ta #e etc.

    'commonly referred to as hardeners) to molten metal prior to casting. $mong these elements

    Ti is the most efficient grain refiner. =oron addition is "nown to improve the grain refining

    efficiency of Ti. In the early stages of development of this field Ti and = were introduced

    into the melt as reducible halide salts such as B1Ti25and B=23. However this practice was

    later abandoned due to the difficulties in controlling the Ti and = contents high dross andlarge fumes. Ti and = additions to $l in the form of master alloys li"e $l!Ti and $l!Ti!=

    were found to be more effective than in the salts. In addition these master alloys offer better

    cleanliness and improved product quality. 6rain refinement by $l!Ti!= master alloys is

    believed to be due to the heterogeneous nucleating sites such as Ti$l@ and Ti=1 particles

    present in these alloys.

    It is in general observed that ternary $l!Ti!= master alloys have better grain refining

    efficiency than the binary $l!Ti master alloys. 2ig. 03 shows clearly that even with a ;.;4

  • 8/12/2019 Metallurgy of Casting

    9/12

    $ number of test procedures such as $lcan test $lcoa test the B=I ring test and

    $luminium $ssociation test e(ist for assessing the grain refining efficiency of a grain refiner.

    However most of these tests are associated with high cooling rates that may influence the

    assessment of performance of the grain refiners. Thermal analysis technique has also beenused to assess the performance of grain refiners in case of a number of foundry alloys. This

    technique is quite fast and is being used by many foundries.

    $ number of manufacturing process parameters such as Ti,= ratio reaction temperature

    reaction time sequence of addition of salts and stirring conditions strongly influence the grain

    refining efficiency of the $l!Ti!= master alloys prepared by the salt route. The literature and

    e(perience of the authors have shown that the microstructure of the master alloy particularly

    the morphology sie and sie distribution of Ti$l@particles has a strong bearing on the grain

    refining characteristics of the master alloy. =loc"y Ti$l@particles are "nown to ma"e the

    master alloy fast acting while plate li"e particles result in a slow acting one. 2igure 5a and b

    show the bloc"y and plate li"e Ti$l@particles respectively in $l!Ti!= master alloys. $ higherreaction temperature '0;;;;#) during master alloy preparation is "nown to result in plate

    li"e Ti$l@ particles while at lower temperatures '9;;;#) bloc"y ones are formed. The

    present authors have also shown that thermo!mechanical treatments of the master alloys lead

    to improved grain refining efficiency. The alloying elements have a strong role to play some

    of them such as #u Mg An etc aiding in grain refinement while some others such as #r Ar

    +i and *i causing poisoning.

    The mechanism of grain refinement in $l after the addition of $l!Ti!= master alloys is

    still a subJect of controversy. *everal mechanisms have been postulated but no clear

    consensus has emerged as yet. The mechanisms available can be classified as nucleant

    paradigms and solute paradigms. The nucleant paradigms deal with the heterogeneous

    nucleation of solid $l on some nucleating sites. The solute paradigms incorporate the

    influence of solute elements on the grain refinement process. The theories available so far on

    the mechanism of grain refinement can be grouped as '0) carbide,boride theory '1) phase

    diagram,peritectic theory '@) peritectic hul" theory '3) hypernucleation theory '4) duple(

    nucleation theory and '5) solute theory. However neither of these theories can provide a

    detailed reasoning for all the e(perimental observations. There is almost certainly more than

    one mechanism operating during grain refinement which in turn may depend on the nucleant

    or grain refiner used the alloy being cast and the processing conditions employed. 2urther a

    more systematic wor" on this subJect is necessary to formulate a universally acceptable set of

    grain refinement mechanisms.

    Modf!aton of A$2S a$$oy me$t"

    The eutectic mi(ture in $l!*i alloys contains *i needles which deteriorate the

    mechanical properties of these alloys. The eutectic *i responds favourably to modification by

    fast cooling as well as by some chemical modifier such as -a and *r that changes the

    morphology of eutectic *i from acicular to fine fibrous one. 2ig. 05 gives an e(ample of the

    effect of modification on the microstructure. It has been confirmed by optical metallography

    that the addition of small amounts of sodium containing flu(es caused the eutectic *i to

    solidify with a fine apparently globular morphology whereas untreated alloy contains the *i

    phase in the form of large plates with sharp sides and ends 'acicular *i). ?ith high coolingrate as in the case of chill casting the fla"y nature of the eutectic *i changes to fine fibrous

  • 8/12/2019 Metallurgy of Casting

    10/12

    morphology. =ut the growth mechanism of *i in the chemically modified alloy is quite

    different from that in the chill cast alloy.

    F%. &, Effect of modification on the microstructure

    The *i platelets in an unmodified alloy seem to be disconnected when viewed at low

    magnification and without deep etching. #onsequently it was believed that each of the coarse

    *i particles is an isolated crystal. +ater it was observed that radial *i particles grew across the

    primary $l dendrites and concluded to be grown in three dimensions. The fla"y nature of the

    unmodified *i was later confirmed by electron microscopy. $t relatively fast cooling rates

    such as in chill casting the $l!*i eutectic is much finer and the *i assumes fibrous

    morphology.

    *everal elements have been found to produce fibrous eutectic *i structure that include

    *odium *trontium >otassium Cubedium #esium #alcium =arium +anthanum and

    Ktterbium. $lso the additions of elements such as $ntimony *elenium and #admium have

    found to reduce the coarse lamellar *i to fine acicular structure. $mong all the above

    elements -a in the range of ;.;;4!;.;0< is considered to be the most effective modifier. *r

    in the range ;.;1!;.;3< is widely used for modification in the industries. =ecause of the to(ic

    nature of *b it is being used only by primary industries.

    The addition of modifier not only changes the *i morphology from platelets to fibrous

    forms but it also shift the eutectic composition towards higher *i content. +ater it has been

    reported that in addition to shifting the eutectic composition to a higher *i level chemical

    modification lowered the eutectic freeing temperature from 488 ! 453

    o

    #.

    The selection of modifier depends upon several factors such as its modification

    efficiency which is related to the number of twins produced in modified *i fibres. The twin

    spacing measured with different modifiers indicate minimum twin spacing or greatest number

    of twins in the case of -a modification which clearly indicates that -a is a better modifier

    than other elements. However the high reactivity of -a ma"es it difficult to handle. $lso

    since the solubility of -a in $l is very poor ';.;0

  • 8/12/2019 Metallurgy of Casting

    11/12

    sensitivity loss by vaporiation is very low compared to -a and hence better control in the

    melt solid solubility in $l is much higher than -a and as such $l base master alloys can be

    prepared for addition as modifiers. These have led towards a growing importance of *r as a

    modifier and master alloys containing different amounts of *r has been developed for

    industrial uses. The *r modification not only alters the *i morphology but it changes the ! $l

    percentage as well as its morphology in the case of eutectic $l!*i alloy. It has been observedthat increasing the amount of *r from ;.;04!;.;@8< promotes the growth of columnar

    dendrites and results in a remar"able increase in the amount of dendritic !phase by around

    1@5< compared to the unmodified alloy. The increase in the amount of !phase can be

    e(plained in terms of the shift in the eutectic to higher *i level and the lowering of the

    eutectic temperature.

    In hypoeutectic $l!*i alloys there are three different possible eutectic nucleation and

    growth modes depending upon the solidification conditions. These are the nucleation and

    growth of eutectic 'a) from the mould wall 'b) primary $l dendrites and 'c) heterogeneous

    nucleants in the interdendritic liquid. The *r addition has found to alter the growth modes.Ithas been found that *r addition increases the volume percentage of the porosity pore sie and

    pore number in different casting configuration. The pore morphology changes from irregular

    interconnected in appearance to more rounded and distorted It has been reported that *r has

    been found to increase the amount of surface defects in commercial alloys. $lloys of near

    eutectic composition are also reported to be prone to surface defects when modified with *r.

    #ontrary to the above findings there are reports which indicate that *r modification increases

    the total volume of the porosity. *ince the hydrogen content is not altered by the addition of

    *r it is argued that the porosity will not be changed. However the porosity is found to be

    widely distributed in the casting with the addition of modifier such as *r. It has been observed

    that the total shrin"age which is an alloy property is not at all affected by the modification.

    However distribution of shrin"age between the micro piping and the micro shrin"age hasbeen noticed. ?ith the modification some of the piping is reduced and the amount of this

    reduction appears as distributed porosity within the castings. Thus the casting appears as more

    porous not due to more dissolved gas but due to the redistribution of porosity from primary

    piping to micro porosity.

    The effect of *b addition as a modifier has been studied in detail and found that unli"e

    with alloys modified by -a or *r the properties of $l!*i alloys treated with *b are not

    dependant on processing variables such as time remelting and degassing. Though the *b

    treatment does not produce eutectic *ilicon with fibrous morphology as in the case of -a or

    *r considerable reduction in sie as well as shape is obtained. The under cooling produced by

    the addition of small amounts of *b to eutectic $l!*i alloy showed the presence of !$l in themicrostructure. The high temperature LCD studies carried out on eutectic $l!*i alloys

    revealed the segregation of *i atom with the addition of *b which in turn promotes the

    nucleation of *i atom aggregates during the solidification thus modifying the shape and sie

    of the *i phase in the solid state.

    +imited data is available in the literature on the modification effect of al"ali al"aline

    earth metals and rare earth metals. However the studies carried out on the effect of =a #a K

    and Kb as a modifier in hypoeutectic alloys revealed that these elements modify the eutectic

    *i in different degrees. $mong the four =a gave the best result the addition of which of the

    order of ;; ppm gave fully modified fibrous eutectic *i. #a was also found to be a good

    modifier to get fibrous *i morphology and the modification level was found to increase with

    increase of #a addition. K and Kb addition have been found to modify the eutectic *i to fine

  • 8/12/2019 Metallurgy of Casting

    12/12

    plate!li"e structure. The additions of these elements also have been found to promote changes

    in the nucleation and growth mode of the eutectic. 2urther #a and K cause eutectic growth to

    occur with a strong dependency on the thermal gradient i.e. eutectic growth from the surface

    towards the centre on a macro scale.

    There are si( classes of microstructure obtained by modification in the case ofhypoeutectic alloys. #lass 5 represents the super modified structure which is not repeatable.

    MaJority of the modified castings will have structure of 0!4 type. %Modification ratings& is

    generally used to assess the efficiency of the modifier. It is calculated by measuring the

    percentage of each class of modification on a well!polished sample by optical metallographic

    techniques. The variables that determine the microstructure are the type of modifier and its

    amount impurities present in the metal freeing rate and *i content in the alloy. =oth -a and

    *r will produce all the si( classes of microstructure. There are some elements li"e > when

    present in the metal will ma"e the modification difficult. In other words impurities present in

    the metal will also play a role in getting modified structure. *imilarly the cooling rate or rate

    of solidification of the melt also influences the modification. The modification process will be

    assisted by higher cooling rate and hence less quantity of modifier will be sufficient in suchcases. It is natural that higher *i containing alloy need higher amount of modifier to get

    particular class of modification. $n e(cess level of modifier will produce what is called an

    over modified structure which will reduce the mechanical properties.

    *r when used as a modifier may lead to the formation of $l 3*r*i1 intermetallic that

    has deleterious effects on the mechanical properties. If the modified melt is "ept for a long

    time the fading effect will become effective in which the levels of -a or *r in the melt will

    come down with time. 2ading in case of -a is much faster than that in case of *r. The high!

    resolution microscopic observation of high degree of twins in *i fibres of *r modified $l!*i

    alloy threw light on the role of twins in the formation of fibrous eutectic *i. Impurity induced

    twinning theory was also used to e(plain the mechanism of eutectic *i modification by a

    chemical modifier and this became more widely accepted eutectic modification theory.

    $ccording to this theory chemical modifiers are impurities that poison the growing atomic *i

    layers by getting adsorbed on to surface steps producing "in"s and thus preventing further

    attachments of *i atoms to the crystal. The adsorbed impurity atoms induce twinning by

    altering the stac"ing sequence of atomic layers. The condition of growth twin was found to be

    that the ratio of the impurity atom radius to the matri( atom radius should be 0.53.

    The microstructure of hypereutectic $l!*i alloys consists of primary *i phase in a

    binary eutectic. The presence of modifier such as *r ';.0