metarhizium transfers nitrogen from insect cadaver to plant

Upload: tassio-lima-tavares

Post on 03-Jun-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Metarhizium Transfers Nitrogen From Insect Cadaver to Plant

    1/3

    DOI: 10.1126/science.1222289, 1576 (2012);336Scienceet al.S. W. Behie

    Insects to PlantsEndophytic Insect-Parasitic Fungi Translocate Nitrogen Directly fro

    This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only.

    clicking here.colleagues, clients, or customers by, you can order high-quality copies for yourIf you wish to distribute this article to others

    here.following the guidelines

    can be obtained byPermission to republish or repurpose articles or portions of articles

    ):June 27, 2012www.sciencemag.org (this information is current as of

    The following resources related to this article are available online at

    http://www.sciencemag.org/content/336/6088/1576.full.htmlversion of this article at:

    including high-resolution figures, can be found in the onlineUpdated information and services,

    http://www.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2012/06/20/336.6088.1576.DC1.htmlcan be found at:Supporting Online Material

    http://www.sciencemag.org/content/336/6088/1576.full.html#ref-list-1, 4 of which can be accessed free:cites 15 articlesThis article

    http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/collection/ecology

    Ecologysubject collections:This article appears in the following

    registered trademark of AAAS.is aScience2012 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science; all rights reserved. The title

    CopyrighAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005.(print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published weekly, except the last week in December, by thScience

    http://www.sciencemag.org/about/permissions.dtlhttp://www.sciencemag.org/about/permissions.dtlhttp://www.sciencemag.org/about/permissions.dtlhttp://www.sciencemag.org/about/permissions.dtlhttp://www.sciencemag.org/about/permissions.dtlhttp://www.sciencemag.org/about/permissions.dtlhttp://www.sciencemag.org/content/336/6088/1576.full.htmlhttp://www.sciencemag.org/content/336/6088/1576.full.htmlhttp://www.sciencemag.org/content/336/6088/1576.full.htmlhttp://www.sciencemag.org/content/336/6088/1576.full.html#ref-list-1http://www.sciencemag.org/content/336/6088/1576.full.html#ref-list-1http://www.sciencemag.org/content/336/6088/1576.full.html#ref-list-1http://www.sciencemag.org/content/336/6088/1576.full.html#ref-list-1http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/collection/ecologyhttp://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/collection/ecologyhttp://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/collection/ecologyhttp://www.sciencemag.org/content/336/6088/1576.full.html#ref-list-1http://www.sciencemag.org/content/336/6088/1576.full.htmlhttp://www.sciencemag.org/about/permissions.dtlhttp://www.sciencemag.org/about/permissions.dtlhttp://oascentral.sciencemag.org/RealMedia/ads/click_lx.ads/sciencemag/cgi/reprint/L22/582464388/Top1/AAAS/PDF-Sigma-Science-120101/sh4971_Science_sponsor_logo_v5.raw/71304a2f5a552f724e55414141465235?x
  • 8/12/2019 Metarhizium Transfers Nitrogen From Insect Cadaver to Plant

    2/3

    9. R. S. DeFrieset al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99,

    14256 (2002).

    10. F. Achard, H. D. Eva, P. Mayaux, H.-J. Stibig, A. Belward,

    Global Biogeochem. Cycles 18, GB2008 (2004).

    11. Y. Pan et al., Science 333, 988 (2011).

    12. A. Bacciniet al., Nature Clim. Change 2, 182 (2012).

    13. M. C. Hansenet al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 ,

    9439 (2008).

    14. M. C. Hansen, S. V. Stehman, P. V. Potapov,Proc. Natl.

    Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 , 8650 (2010).

    15. S. S. Saatchiet al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108,

    9899 (2011).

    16. Materials and methods are available as supplementary

    materials on Science Online.

    17. K. Mokany, R. J. Raison, A. S. Prokushkin,Glob. Change Biol.

    12, 84 (2006).

    18. M. A. Cairns, S. Brown, E. H. Helmer, G. A. Baumgardner,

    Oecologia111 , 1 (1997).

    19. FAO/IIASA/ISRIC/ISSCAS/JRC. Harmonized World Soil

    Database (version 1.1); FAO, Rome, Italy and IIASA,

    Laxenburg, Austria (2009)

    20. O. Arino et al., GlobCover: ESA service for global

    land cover from MERIS. Geoscience and Remote

    Sensing Symposium (IEEE International, IGARSS 2007,

    2007).

    21. IPCC, IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas

    inventories (IGES, Japan, 2006; www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/

    public/2006gl/index.html).

    22. S. E. Page et al., Nature 420, 61 (2002).

    23. G. R. van der Werf et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    105, 20350 (2008).

    24. A. Hooijer et al., Biogeosciences 7, 1505 (2010).

    Acknowledgments:Funding for this work was provided to

    Winrock International under contract 7150484 by the World

    Banks World Development Report 2010: Development and

    Climate Change. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions

    expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors.

    They do not necessarily represent the views of the World

    Bank and its affiliated organizations or those of the Executive

    Directors of the World Bank or the governments they

    represent. Support for the forest cover loss mapping work

    was provided by National Aeronautics and Space Administrati

    Land Cover and Land Use Change and MEASURES program

    under grants NNG06GD95G and NNX08AP33A. The autho

    would like to thank K. Mokany for providing the original

    data used to derive relationships between above- and

    belowground biomass. Forest loss data are available at

    http://globalmonitoring.sdstate.edu/projects/gfm. Carbon

    stock data are available at http://carbon.jpl.nasa.gov.

    Emissions data are available at www.appliedgeosolutions.com

    science-paper.html.

    Supplementary Materials

    www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/336/6088/1573/DC1Materials and Methods

    Figs. S1 to S3

    Tables S1 and S2

    References (2529)

    15 December 2011; accepted 3 May 2012

    10.1126/science.1217962

    Endophytic Insect-Parasitic FungiTranslocate Nitrogen Directlyfrom Insects to PlantsS. W. Behie,1 P. M. Zelisko,2 M. J. Bidochka1*

    Most plants obtain nitrogen through nitrogen-fixing bacteria and microbial decompositionof plant and animal material. Many vascular plants are able to form close symbiotic associationswith endophytic fungi. Metarhizium is a common plant endophyte found in a large numberof ecosystems. This abundant soil fungus is also a pathogen to a large number of insects,which are a source of nitrogen. It is possible that the endophytic capability and insectpathogenicity of Metarhiziumare coupled to provide an active method of nitrogen transferto plant hosts via fungal mycelia. We used soil microcosms to test the ability of M. robertsiito translocate insect-derived nitrogen to plants. Insects were injected with 15N-labeled nitrogen,

    and we tracked the incorporation of

    15

    N into amino acids in two plant species, haricot bean(Phaseolus vulgaris) and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), in the presence of M. robertsii. Thesefindings are evidence that active nitrogen acquisition by plants in this tripartite interactionmay play a larger role in soil nitrogen cycling than previously thought.

    Nitrogen gas, although it constitutes 78%

    of the atmosphere, is unavailable to plants

    as a source of nitrogen unless it is fixed

    by microbial symbionts (e.g.,Rhizobium) or free-

    living microbes (e.g., Azotobacter) (1). In many

    natural as well as agricultural settings, nitrogen is

    the limiting nutrient for plant growth. The current

    model of the soil nitrogen cycle relies heavily

    on nitrogen-fixing bacteria to furnish plants with

    usable nitrogen (some is fixed by lightning strikes)

    (2). However, there are some examples in which

    plants have evolved mechanisms to scavenge ni-

    trogen from insects. Carnivorous plants are able

    to obtain substantial amounts of nitrogen from

    insects they ingest. Pitcher plants (families

    Nepenthaceae and Sarraceniaceae) trap insects in

    a deep cavity filled with liquid, andinsect-derived

    nitrogen can constitute up to 70% of the plant ni-

    trogen content (3). In one known case of fungus-

    mediated transfer of insect-derived nitrogen to

    plants, the ectomycorrhizal fungusLaccaria bi-

    colortransfers nitrogen from soil-dwelling col-

    lembola to white pine (Pinus strobus) whoseroots

    it colonizes (4).

    The ability ofL. bicolorto transfer insect-

    derived nitrogen was specific to white pine, and

    generallyL. bicolorassociates with roots of pine

    and spruce in temperate forests (5,6). Nonethe-

    less, these findings suggest that a more general

    example of insect-derived nitrogen transfer via fun-

    gal mycelia to plants may exist.Metarhizium spp.

    are ubiquitous soil-dwelling insect-pathogenic

    fungi that are found in a variety of ecosystems

    worldwide (7),occurin soils upto 106propagules

    per gram (8), and can infect more than 200 spe-

    cies of insects (9). Insects contribute substantial

    amounts of nitrogen to soil. Each square me

    of habitat can provide 0.4 to 4 g (by weight)

    available insect nitrogen (see supplement

    text).

    During a routine survey of plant root sybionts, we found thatMetarhizium spp. form

    endophytic associations with many plant sp

    cies (10, 11). Endophytes live internally with

    the plant, and the host plant may benefit fro

    the interaction (12). Here, we hypothesized t

    Metarhizium can parasitize and kill a soil-bo

    insect, then transfer the insect-derived nit

    gen to plants via fungal mycelia and endophy

    association.

    We used 15N-labeled waxmoth (Galle

    mellonella) larvae as a model prey insect a

    used this model in the experimental design

    measureMetarhizium-mediated translocation15

    N to the foliage of haricot bean (Phaseovulgaris) or switchgrass (Panicum virgatu15N-labeled waxmoth larvae were added to m

    crocosms in which the roots of the plants w

    separated from each insect by means of a 30-m

    mesh (fig. S1). The insects were infected

    Metarhizium 48 hours after 15N injection a

    then placed into the microcosm, and the amou

    of 15N transfer to plant tissues was determin

    during a 1-month period. After 14 days, in

    presence ofMetarhizium, insect-derived nitrog

    constituted 28% and 32% of the nitrogen cont

    in haricot bean and switchgrass, respectively; t

    represented significantly greater 15N incorpo

    tion than in the presence of uninfected 15

    labeled waxmoth larvae [Fig. 1, factorial analy

    of variance (ANOVA),P< 0.01]. After 28 da

    insect-derived nitrogen constituted 12% and 4

    of bean and switchgrass nitrogen content, resp

    tively, in the presence ofMetarhizium; this ag

    represented significantly greater15N incorporat

    than in the presence of uninfected 15N-label

    waxmoth larvae (Fig. 1; factorial ANOVA, P

    0.05). Similar results were observed when

    plant seeds were first inoculated with conidia

    Metarhiziumand subsequently formed a root e

    dophytic association. We therefore concluded t

    1Department of Biological Sciences, Brock University, St.Catharines, Ontario L2S 3A1, Canada. 2Department of Chem-istry, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario L2S 3A1, Canada.

    *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:[email protected]

    22 JUNE 2012 VOL 336 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org76

    REPORTS

  • 8/12/2019 Metarhizium Transfers Nitrogen From Insect Cadaver to Plant

    3/3

    the hyphae infected the insect and transferred ni-

    trogen back to the plant.

    Plants grown in a soil microcosm containing

    a non-endophytic insect pathogen (Aspergillus

    flavus strain 6982) (13) in the presence of 15N-

    labeled waxmoth larvae contained less than 10%

    insect-derived nitrogen, which was not significant-

    ly different from plants grown in the presence of

    uninfected 15N-labeled waxmoth larvae (Fig.

    factorial ANOVA,P> 0.05). In this experime

    insects were infected byM. robertsiiorA. flav

    within 2 days of placement into the microcos

    Insects were alive when placed into the mic

    cosm but within two days of inoculation the l

    vae were dead. Six days after inoculation inse

    were mummified with fungal conidia, this w

    not observed in control experiments (fig. S

    Fungal propagules of both species were fou

    within 0.5 cm of the plant roots within 6 da(fig. S3). Liquid chromatographymass spectro

    etry was used to confirm the incorporation

    insect-derived 15N into plant amino acids (table S

    Our results show that these plants derive

    significant proportion of nitrogen from soil

    sects through their endophytic associations w

    the insect pathogen, Metarhizium spp. (Fig.

    PossiblyM. robertsiiprovides nitrogen to the pl

    in exchange forcarbon. A plant carbon transpor

    Mrt (Metarhiziumraffinose transporter), has be

    reported forMetarhiziumand is required for su

    cessful root colonization (14). Symbiotic assoc

    tion ofMetarhizium with plants may aid in pl

    survival in nitrogen-limited soils as vectors for quiring nitrogen from insects.

    References and Notes1. E. C. Cocking,Plant Soil 252, 169 (2003).

    2. J. N. Galloway,Environ. Pollut. 102, 15 (1998).

    3. W. Schulze, E. D. Schulze, I. Schulze, R. Oren,J. Exp.

    52, 1041 (2001).

    4. J. N. Klironomos, M. M. Hart,Nature 4 10, 651

    (2001).

    5. D. L. Richter, J. N. Bruhn, Soil Biol. Biochem. 25, 35

    (1993).

    6. C. A. Buschena, R. L. Doudrick, N. A. Anderson,Can

    For. Res. 22, 1883 (1992).

    7. R. J. St. Leger, in Parasites and Pathogens of Insects

    N. C. Beckage, S. N. Thompson, B. A. Federici, Eds.

    (Academic Press, New York, 1993), pp. 211229.

    8. R. J. Milner, in Biological Control of Locusts and

    Grasshoppers, C. J. Lomer, C. Prior, Eds. (CAB

    International, Wallingford, UK, 1991), pp. 200207.

    9. D. W. Roberts, A. Hajek, in Frontiers in Industrial

    Mycology, G. F. Leathan, Ed. (Chapman & Hall, New Y

    1992), pp. 144159.

    10. M. Wyrebek, C. Huber, R. K. Sasan, M. J. Bidochka,

    Microbiology157 , 2904 (2011).

    11. R. K. Sasan, M. J. Bidochka,Am. J. Bot. 99 , 101

    (2012).

    12. K. Saikkonen, S. H. Faeth, M. Helander, T. J. Sullivan

    Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29, 319 (1998).

    13. L. R. Scully, M. J. Bidochka, Can. J. Microbiol. 5

    185 (2005).

    14. W. Fang, R. J. St. Leger, Plant Physiol. 1 54, 1549

    (2011).

    Acknowledgments:Supported by a Natural Sciences andEngineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant

    (M.J.B.). We thank M. K. Bidochka for Fig. 2.

    Supplementary Materialswww.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/336/6088/1576/DC1

    Materials and Methods

    Supplementary Text

    Figs. S1 to S3

    Table S1

    References (1518)

    22 March 2012; accepted 2 May 2012

    10.1126/science.1222289

    Fig. 2.Representationofthe transfer of the insect-derived nitrogen to plantsthrough an associationwith endophytic, insect-parasitic Metarhizium.

    Metarhizium infects and

    kills a soil-born insect.From the dead parasitizedinsect, fungal mycelia thenassociate endophyticallywith plant roots, throughwhich nitrogen transloca-tion occurs. The reversemay also occur; that is,endophytically associated

    Metarhiziumcould para-sitize and kill an insect.

    Fig. 1. Percentage ofplant nitrogen derivedfrom waxmoth larvae byan endophytic, insect-pathogenic fungus. Twoplant species were used:haricot bean(Phaseolus vul-

    garis) (A to C) and switch-grass (Panicum virgatum)(D to F). Shown are resultsobtainedwithMetarhiziumrobertsii[(A) and (D)], with

    Aspergillus flavus[(B) and(E)], and without fungus[(C)and(F)]. Nitrogen source:solid circles, waxmoth lar-vae; open circles, no wax-moth larvae. The amountof insect-derived nitrogenin the plant issues was de-terminedwith a NOI-5emis-sion spectrophotometer.Nitrogen content was cal-culated as 100 %15N inseedling leaves. Results

    were analyzed using ttests.Error bars represent 1 SE;N= 6.Results are the meansofthreeseparate trialsdonein duplicate.

    0

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    35

    45

    40

    0

    10

    5

    -5

    -5

    147 281

    0

    10

    5

    -5281471

    Haricot Bean Switchgrass

    Insect-derivedNinleaves(%)

    A D

    F

    E

    C

    B

    Time (days)

    1

    1

    7

    7

    14

    14

    28

    28

    1

    1

    7

    7

    14

    14

    28

    28

    www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 336 22 JUNE 2012

    REP