method development and validation for related …
TRANSCRIPT
www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │
838
METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED
SUBSTANCES OF BOSUTINIB MONOHYDRATE BY RP-HPLC
METHOD
Yogendra B. Parmar*, Dharmesh Shah, Yashraj A. Majmudar, Ketul C. Kaka, Arpan
S. Patel, Pankaj D. Kankad and Uday G. Sartanpara
BDR Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd. R.S No.578, Near Effluent Channel, Luna Village, Taluka-Padra,
Vadodara District, Gujrat-391440, India.
ABSTRACT
An accurate, sensitive and rapid gradient reverse phase high
performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method has been
developed and validated for related substances of Bosutinib
monohydrate. HPLC analysis was performed on Inertsil ODS 3V (250
x 4.6) mm, 5 m. Column temperature maintained at 40°C conditions.
Chromatographic separation was achieved with mobile phase gradient
program at flow rate of 0.7mL/min. the injection volume was 15μl.
The UV detection wavelength was 250nm. The method suitability was
checked and validated according to the ICH guidelines for specificity,
linearity, accuracy, precision, limit of quantification, limit of detection.
Limit of detection each impurity is less than 0.05% w/w indicating that
the developed method is highly sensitive. The calibration curve was
found to be linear within the concentration range of 0.5µg/mL to 10µg/mL. The regression
data for calibration curve shows good linear relationship. Correl coefficient (r2) of each
impurity is greater than 0.9991. The experiment results are given in detail in this research
article.
KEYWARD: RP-HPLC, Method validation, Method Development, BST, Related
substances.
WORLD JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
SJIF Impact Factor 7.632
Volume 10, Issue 1, 838-854 Research Article ISSN 2278 – 4357
*Corresponding Author
Yogendra B. Parmar
BDR Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd.
R.S No.578, Near Effluent
Channel, Luna Village,
Taluka-Padra Vadodara
District, Gujrat-391440,
India.
Article Received on
24 October 2020,
Revised on 14 Nov. 2020,
Accepted on 04 Dec. 2020
DOI: 10.20959/wjpps20211-17727
www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │
839
Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
INTRODUCTION
Bosutinib Monohydrate is chemically known as 4-(2, 4-dichloro-5-methoxyanilino)-6-
methoxy-7-[3-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl) propoxy] quinoline-3-carbonitrile; hydrate, molecular
formula is C26H31Cl2N5O4 and molecular weight is 548.45g/mole. Bosutinib[3]
marketed
under the trade name Bosulif[1]
is a small molecule and tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for the
treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia. Originally synthesized by Wyeth, it is being
developed by Pfizer.[2,7]
Bosutinib received US FDA and EU European Medicines Agency
approval on September 4, 2012 and 27 March 2013 respectively for the treatment of adult
patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive[6]
(Ph+) chronic myelogenous leukaemia
(CML) with resistance, or intolerance to prior therapy is approved to treat: Chronic
myelogenous leukaemia (CML) that is Philadelphia chromosome positive.[4]
It is used in
patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML. In patients with chronic phase,
accelerated phase, or blastic phase CML that cannot be treated with or that did not respond to
other treatment.
Bosutinib is also being studied in the treatment of other types of cancer.[5]
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The chemical structure of Bosutinib Monohydrate is shown in Figure 1.
N
N
O N
O CN
NH
ClCl
O
H2O
Figure 1: Structure of bosutinib monohydrate.
Molecular formula: C26H31Cl2N5O4
Molecular weight: 548.45g/mol
IUPAC Name: 4-(2, 4-dichloro-5-methoxyanilino)-6-methoxy-7-[3-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)
propoxy] quinoline-3-carbonitrile; hydrate.
www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │
840
Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
There is no single pharmacopeial monograph available for this drug substance or drug
product and no HPLC method is available in literature for quantification of Bosutinib
Monohydrate related substances. In this research paper, development of HPLC method for
the simultaneous detection and quantitative determination of the four impurities in Bosutinib
Monohydrate drug substance has been reported. The chemical structure of Bosutinib
Monohydrate Related substances Impurity-1 to Impurity-5 are shown in Figure 2.
Name Structure
Impurity-1
O–
N+
O
O
Cl
OCH3
Impurity-2 O
NH OCH3
ClCl
N
Impurity-3 2
3
4
5
1
6
7NO2
O
O
CH3
N
NCH3
8
9
10
1112
Impurity-4 2
3
4
5
1
6
7NH2
O
O
CH3
N
NCH3
8
9
10
11
13
12
Impurity-5
2
3
4
5
1
6
7NH
O
O
CH3
N
NCH3
NCO
NH
ClCl
OCH3
8
9
10
11
13
12
14
15
18
16
17
Figure 2: structure of Bosutinib Monohydrate Related substances Impurity-1 to
Impurity-5.
www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │
841
Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ) and linearity were established as per
ICH guidelines. The limit of unknown impurity have been considered as 0.3% in accordance
with ICH guideline based on maximum daily dose.[8]
The developed chromatographic method
can resolve related substances with acceptable resolution to achieve good chromatography
and the optimized methodology have been validated to accomplish ICH guidelines on
validation.[9]
Bosutinib monohydrate related substances impurity-1 to impurity-5 properties
Impurity-1
Molecular Formula : C10H8Cl2N2O2
Molecular Weight : 259.089g/mol
Chemical Name: 2-Cyano-N-(2, 4-Dichloro-5-methoxyphenyl) Acetamide
Impurity-2
Molecular Formula : C10H12ClNO4
Molecular Weight : 245.660g/mol
Chemical Name: 2-(3-Chloropropoxy)-1-methoxy-4-nitrobenzene.
Impurity-3
Molecular Formula : C15H23N3O4
Molecular Weight : 309.36g/mol
Chemical Name: 1-[3-(2-methoxy-5-nitrophenoxy) propyl]-4-methylpiperazine
Impurity-4
Molecular Formula : C15H25N3O4
Molecular Weight : 279.38g/mol
Chemical Name: 1-[3-(2-methoxy-5-aminophenoxy) propyl]-4-methylpiperazine
Impurity-5
Molecular Formula : C26H31N5O4Cl2
Molecular Weight : 248.46g/mol
Chemical Name: {E}-2-cyano-{N}-(2, 4-dichloro-5-methoxyphenyl)-3-[4-methoxy-3-[3-(4-
methylpiperazin-1-yl) propoxy] anilino] prop-2-enamide
Instrumentation and Chromatographic conditions
A Thermo scientific Ultimate 3000 HPLC with PDA detector was used for separation and
detection of analyte. Data was collected using CHROMELION software. HPLC analysis was
performed on column Inertsil ODS 3V (250 x 4.6) mm, 5 m. Column temperature
www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │
842
Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
maintained at 40°C conditions. Chromatographic separation was achieved with mobile phase
gradient program at flow rate of 0.7mL/min. the injection volume was 15μl. The UV
detection wavelength was 250nm.
Buffer preparation: 20mM Potassium Dihydrogen Orthophosphate. Adjust pH=7.0 ± 0.05
with triethylamine and mix well.
Mobile Phase-A: Buffer: Methanol (80:20) (V/V)
Mobile Phase-B: Methanol: Acetonitrile (65:35) (V/V)
Gradient programme
Time (min) Mobile Phase A (%) Mobile Phase B (%)
0.0 50 50
12.0 50 50
40.0 0 100
48.0 0 100
49.0 50 50
60.0 50 50
Preparation of solutions
Diluent: Water: Acetonitrile: Methanol (25:50:25) (V/V/V)
Standard stock solution: Accurately weigh and transfer about 50mg of BST working or
reference standard into 50mL volumetric flask. Add 25mL of diluent and sonicate to dissolve
and dilute up to mark with diluent. Further dilute 3.0mL of this solution into 100mL
volumetric flask and dilute up to mark with diluent and mix well.
Standard solution: Transfer 1.0mL of standard stock solution into 10mL volumetric flask
and dilute up to mark with diluent and mixed well.
Test solution: Accurately weigh and transfer about 50mg of test sample into 50mL
volumetric flask. Add 25mL of diluent and sonicate to dissolve and dilute up to mark with
diluent and mix well.
System suitability criteria
1. %RSD for Bosutinib peak area from six replicate standard and with bracketing standard
solution should not be more than 5.0%.
2. Theoretical plates for Bosutinib in standard solution should not be less than 2000.
3. Tailing factor for Bosutinib in standard solution should not be more than 2.0.
www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │
843
Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
RT, RRT & RRF are mentioned in below table.
Name of content ~ RT (min) RRT RRF
Impurity-1 20.40 0.74 0.43
Impurity-2 11.13 0.41 0.64
Impurity-3 13.90 0.51 0.39
Impurity-4 6.45 0.24 0.26
Impurity-5 35.75 1.30 0.38
Bosutinib (BST) 27.84 1.00 --
Calculation
AT WS 3 1 50 1 P
%Known impurity= --------X--------- X -------- X-------X --------X---------X-------X 100
AS 50 100 10 WT RRF 100
AU WS 3 1 50 P
% Unknown impurity= --------X--------- X -------- X-------X --------X---------X 100
AS 50 100 10 WT 100
Total impurities = Sum of all known impurities + unknown impurities.
Where,
AT = Area of known impurity from test solution chromatogram.
AU = Area of unknown impurity from test solution chromatogram.
AS = Average area of six replicate of standard solution.
WS = Weight of working/ reference standard in mg.
WT = Weight of test sample in mg.
P = Potency of standard
RRF= Relative response factor.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Selection of detection wavelength
The sensitivity of RP-HPLC method with UV detection depends upon proper selection of
detection wavelength. An ideal wavelength is one that gives good response for the drugs that
are to be detected. BST showed maximum absorption at 250nm and it was selected as
detection wavelength for RP-HPLC analysis.
Optimization of mobile phase
Proper selection of HPLC method depends upon the nature of the sample (ionic, ionizable or
neutral molecule), its molecular weight and solubility. The drug selected for the present study
is polar in nature and hence either reversed phase or ion pair or ion-exchange
www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │
844
Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
chromatography can be used. Reversed phase HPLC was selected for the initial separation
because of its simplicity and suitability. The optimization of mobile phase was to resolve
chromatographic peaks for active drug ingredients with less asymmetric factor. There were
many mobile phases that we tried to resolve peaks, in that first mobile phase-A with 20mM
KH2PO4, pH 2.5 and mobile phase-B with acetonitrile but impurity-3 peak was found gradient
pattern for BST. To improve these, mobile phase-A with buffer (20mM KH2PO4, pH 7.0):
Methanol (80:20 v/v) and mobile phase-B with methanol but all peaks were found very poor.
Further improve these combination of mobile phase were tried in that mobile phase-A with
buffer (20mM KH2PO4, pH 7.0): Methanol (80:20 v/v) and mobile phase-B with methanol:
acetonitrile (50:50 v/v), were tried but we found impurity-4 peak near dad volume and
baseline not proper. Further improve these combination of mobile phase were tried in that
mobile phase-A with buffer (20mM KH2PO4, pH 7.0): Methanol (80:20 v/v) and mobile
phase-B with methanol: acetonitrile (65:35 v/v), with gradient program was found to give a
good resolution and symmetric peaks for BST and all related substances as shown in Figure4.
Figure 4: Chromatogram of Blank and BST mix standard with mobile phase-A with
buffer (20mM KH2PO4, pH 7.0): Methanol (80:20 v/v) and mobile phase-B with
methanol: acetonitrile (65:35 v/v) gradient program.
www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │
845
Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Method validation
The proposed method was subjected to validation for various parameters like Specificity,
precision, LOD, LOQ, linearity and accuracy in accordance with international conference on
harmonization guidelines.
Specificity
Specificity is the ability to assessing unequivocally of analytic in the presence of components
which may be expected to be present. For determination of specificity, blank, all individual
related substances solutions were prepared and injected to confirm the individual retention
times. The solutions of BST drug substance (Control Sample) and BST spiked with known
related substances at specification level (Spiked Sample) were prepared and injected into
HPLC. Peak purity was established by using Chromeleon Software. A typical representative
HPLC chromatogram of BST drug substance spiked with all related substances is shown in
Figure 5. The specificity results are tabulated in Table 1.
Preparation
Standard stock solution: Weigh accurately about 10.0mg of Bosutinib Monohydrate
working or reference standard into a 100mL volumetric flask. Add diluent and sonicate to
dissolve and dilute up to mark with diluent.
Standard solution
Further dilute 1mL Standard Stock Solution into 100mL volumetric flask and dilute up to
mark with diluent mix well. (Concentration of Bosutinib Monohydrate i.e. to 1ppm).
Test and Test spike preparation describe in accuracy parameter. And all individual related
substances preparation from stock solution of precision parameter.
www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │
846
Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Figure 5: A typical representative HPLC chromatogram of BST drug substance spiked
with related substances.
Table 1: Specificity experiment results.
Name of content ~ RT (min) RRT Peak purity match
Impurity-1 20.40 0.74 968
Impurity-2 11.13 0.41 1000
Impurity-3 13.90 0.51 990
Impurity-4 6.45 0.24 999
Impurity-5 35.75 1.30 995
Bosutinib (BST) 27.84 1.00 994
BST Sample Spike - - 995
System suitability
System suitability test was an integral part of the method development to verify that the
system is adequate for analysis of BST to be performed. Six replicate injections of standard
preparation were injected, then asymmetry, number of theoretical plates and relative standard
deviation of peak area were determined. The system suitability results are shown in Table 2.
Preparation
As per specificity parameter.
Table 2: system suitability experiment results.
Standard BST Area
Injection -1 99.01
Injection -2 99.25
Injection -3 98.75
Mean 99.00
%RSD 0.25
Tailing factor 1.00
Theoretical plates 57284
www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │
847
Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Precision
The Repeatability of sample application was assessed by Transferring 1 mL from standard
stock solutions of BST into a 100 mL volumetric flask and diluted up to the mark with
diluent to get the concentration of 1μg/mL of BST, impurity-1, impurity-2, impurity-3,
impurity-4 and impurity-5. This standard solution was chromatographed for 60 minutes using
mobile phase gradient at a flow rate of 0.7mL/min for three times. All the Results were
reported in terms of % RSD. The precision preparation and experiments results are given in
Table 3.
Table 3: Precision preparation and experiment results.
Name Area
Imp-1 Imp-2 Imp-3 Imp-4 Imp-5 BST
Injection -1 41.51 64.39 38.14 23.85 37.94 99.01
Injection -2 42.65 63.76 37.83 23.47 38.93 99.25
Injection -3 41.48 64.24 38.51 24.05 36.84 98.75
Mean 41.88 64.13 38.16 23.79 37.90 99.00
%RSD 1.59 0.51 0.89 1.24 2.76 0.25
LOD, LOQ
The limit of detection and limit of quantitation shall be determined based on Standard
deviation of response and slop value obtained from the linearity study of related substance for
impurity-1, impurity-2, impurity-3, impurity-4, impurity-5 and BST. LOD and LOQ values
are presented in Table 4.1 to Table 4.6.
Linearity
The linearity of analytical method is its ability to elicit test results that are directly
proportional to concentration of analyte in sample within given range. The linearity is
expressed in terms of correlation co-efficient of linear regression analysis. Prepare the
solution to gate concentration 0.5-10µg/mL for impurity-1, impurity-2, impurity-3, impurity-
Impurity
Name
Wt.
(mg)
Dilution
(mL)
Taken
mL
Dilution (mL)
(stock-2)
Taken
mL
Dilution
(mL)
Conc.
in ppm
BST 20.514 20 1
100 1 10
1.0257
Impurity-1 20.312 20 1 1.0156
Impurity-2 20.265 20 1 1.0133
Impurity-3 20.125 20 1 1.0063
Impurity-4 20.327 20 1 1.0164
Impurity-5 20.221 20 1 1.0111
www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │
848
Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
4, impurity-5 and BST. The graph was plotted for peak area vs. conc. for the drug. The
statistical values are presented in Table 4.1 to Table 4.6 and Figure 6.
Table 4.1: Statistical evaluation of linearity and LOD/LOQ for Bosutinib.
ppm mL of stock-2 solution Dilution Actual. ppm Bosutinib
Area
0.500 0.5 10 0.5129 50.36
1.000 1.0 10 1.0257 99.25
2.000 2.0 10 2.0514 234.76
5.000 5.0 10 5.1285 521.47
10.00 Used as such stock-2 solution 10.2570 1047.20
Slope 101.7076
Intercept 4.6175
Correlation Coefficient (r2) 0.9991
STEYX 14.3802
LOD (ppm) 0.4666
LOQ (ppm) 1.4139
LOD (%) 0.0467
LOQ (%) 0.1414
Table 4.2: Statistical evaluation of linearity and LOD/LOQ for Impurity-1.
ppm mL of stock-2 solution Dilution Actual. ppm Impurity-1
Area
0.500 0.5 10 0.5078 23.31
1.000 1.0 10 1.0156 41.63
2.000 2.0 10 2.0312 89.98
5.000 5.0 10 5.0780 223.39
10.00 Used as such stock-2 solution 10.1560 440.83
Slope 43.4592
Intercept 0.5205
Correlation Coefficient (r2) 0.9999
STEYX 2.3796
LOD (ppm) 0.1807
LOQ (ppm) 0.5476
LOD (%) 0.0181
LOQ (%) 0.0548
RRF 0.43
Table 4.3: Statistical evaluation of linearity and LOD/LOQ for Impurity-2.
ppm mL of stock-2 solution Dilution Actual. ppm Impurity-2
Area
0.500 0.5 10 0.5066 33.06
1.000 1.0 10 1.0133 64.97
2.000 2.0 10 2.0265 133.75
5.000 5.0 10 5.0663 326.63
10.00 Used as such stock-2 solution 10.1325 657.73
www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │
849
Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Slope 64.8324
Intercept 0.1687
Correlation Coefficient (r2) 1.0000
STEYX 1.8302
LOD (ppm) 0.0932
LOQ (ppm) 0.2823
LOD (%) 0.0093
LOQ (%) 0.0282
RRF 0.64
Table 4.4: Statistical evaluation of linearity and LOD/LOQ for Impurity-3.
ppm mL of stock-2 solution Dilution Actual. ppm Impurity-3
Area
0.500 0.5 10 0.5031 20.31
1.000 1.0 10 1.0063 40.00
2.000 2.0 10 2.0125 80.63
5.000 5.0 10 5.0313 199.83
10.00 Used as such stock-2 solution 10.0625 402.94
Slope 40.0127
Intercept -0.2307
Correlation Coefficient (r2) 1.0000
STEYX 0.8470
LOD (ppm) 0.0699
LOQ (ppm) 0.2117
LOD (%) 0.0070
LOQ (%) 0.0212
RRF 0.39
Table 4.5: Statistical evaluation of linearity and LOD/LOQ for Impurity-4.
ppm mL of stock-2 solution Dilution Actual. ppm Impurity-4
Area
0.500 0.5 10 0.5082 11.35
1.000 1.0 10 1.0164 23.26
2.000 2.0 10 2.0327 50.44
5.000 5.0 10 5.0818 128.30
10.00 Used as such stock-2 solution 10.1635 263.68
Slope 26.1598
Intercept -2.9684
Correlation Coefficient (r2) 0.9999
STEYX 1.2411
LOD (ppm) 0.1566
LOQ (ppm) 0.4744
LOD (%) 0.0157
LOQ (%) 0.0474
RRF 0.26
www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │
850
Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Table 4.6: Statistical evaluation of linearity and LOD/LOQ for Impurity-5.
ppm mL of stock-2 solution Dilution Actual. ppm Impurity-5
Area
0.500 0.5 10 0.5055 20.51
1.000 1.0 10 1.0111 38.13
2.000 2.0 10 2.0221 76.26
5.000 5.0 10 5.0553 195.34
10.00 Used as such stock-2 solution 10.1105 392.54
Slope 38.8701
Intercept -0.85333
Correlation Coefficient (r2) 1.0000
STEYX 1.3541
LOD (ppm) 0.1150
LOQ (ppm) 0.3484
LOD (%) 0.0115
LOQ (%) 0.0348
RRF 0.38
www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │
851
Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Figure 6: Linearity plot for BST and Related substances Impurity-1 to Impurity-5.
Accuracy
The accuracy of the method was determined by analyzing BST samples spiked with related
substances at different levels (10%, 20%, 40%, 100% and 200% of specification levels). The
percentage recovery values for all the impurities are calculated and tabulated in Table 5.1 to
table 5.6.
Standard solution
As per specificity parameter.
www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │
852
Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Table 5.1: Accuracy preparation.
Impurity Name Wt. (mg) Dilution (mL) Taken
mL
Dilution (mL)
(Recovery stock)
Conc. in
ppm
Impurity-1 20.312 20 5
50
101.560
Impurity-2 20.265 20 5 101.325
Impurity-3 20.125 20 5 100.625
Impurity-4 20.327 20 5 101.635
Impurity-5 20.221 20 5 101.105
Table 5.2: Accuracy system suitability standard solution.
Standard BST Area
Injection -1 99.01
Injection -2 99.25
Injection -3 98.75
Mean 99.00
%RSD 0.25
Table 5.3: Accuracy for impurity-1.
Rec
overy
L
evel
Des
ign
ati
on
Wei
gh
t of
Sam
ple
(mg)
mL
of
Rec
ov
ery
stock
solu
tion
Dil
uti
on
(m
L)
Act
ual
Con
. (p
pm
)
Act
ual
Ad
ded
Am
ou
nt
(%)
Are
a
% R
esu
lt
Rec
overe
d
%R
esu
lt
Rec
overy
(%
)
As such Test 20.0
20
9.32 0.0225
10% 20.4 1.0 20 0.5078 26.39 26.39 0.0623 0.0398 78.38
20% 20.4 2.0 20 1.0156 44.98 44.98 0.1062 0.0837 82.41
40% 20.4 4.0 20 2.0312 89.7 89.7 0.2119 0.1894 93.25
100% 20.2 10.0 20 5.0780 216.35 216.35 0.5161 0.4936 97.20
200% 20.5 Used 10ppm soln. 10.1560 1.0156 436.98 1.0272 1.0047 98.93
Table 5.4: Accuracy for impurity-2.
Rec
overy
L
evel
Des
ign
ati
on
Wei
gh
t of
Sam
ple
(mg)
mL
of
Rec
ov
ery
stock
solu
tion
Dil
uti
on
(m
L)
Act
ual
Con
. (p
pm
)
Act
ual
Ad
ded
Am
ou
nt
(%)
Are
a
% R
esu
lt
Rec
overe
d
%R
esu
lt
Rec
overy
(%
)
As such Test 20.0
20
ND NA
10% 20.4 1.0 20 0.5066 0.0507 30.81 0.0489 0.0489 96.53
20% 20.4 2.0 20 1.0133 0.1013 54.66 0.0867 0.0867 85.56
40% 20.4 4.0 20 2.0265 0.2027 114.69 0.1820 0.1820 89.81
100% 20.2 10.0 20 5.0663 0.5066 328.63 0.5267 0.5267 103.96
200% 20.5 Used 10ppm soln. 10.1325 1.0133 652.51 1.0305 1.0305 101.70
www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │
853
Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Table 5.5: Accuracy for impurity-3. R
ecovery
L
evel
Des
ign
ati
on
Wei
gh
t of
Sam
ple
(mg)
mL
of
Rec
ov
ery
stock
solu
tion
Dil
uti
on
(m
L)
Act
ual
Con
. (p
pm
)
Act
ual
Ad
ded
Am
ou
nt
(%)
Are
a
% R
esu
lt
Rec
overe
d
%R
esu
lt
Rec
overy
(%
)
As such Test 20.0
20
ND NA
10% 20.4 1.0 20 0.5031 0.0503 17.21 0.0448 0.0448 89.05
20% 20.4 2.0 20 1.0063 0.1006 35.37 0.0921 0.0921 91.52
40% 20.4 4.0 20 2.0125 0.2013 75.64 0.1970 0.1970 97.89
100% 20.2 10.0 20 5.0313 0.5031 188.4 0.4955 0.4955 98.48
200% 20.5 Used 10ppm soln. 10.0625 1.0063 389.5 1.0095 1.0095 100.32
Table 5.6: Accuracy for impurity-4
Rec
overy
L
evel
Des
ign
ati
on
Wei
gh
t of
Sam
ple
(mg)
mL
of
Rec
ov
ery
stock
solu
tion
Dil
uti
on
(m
L)
Act
ual
Con
. (p
pm
)
Act
ual
Ad
ded
Am
ou
nt
(%)
Are
a
% R
esu
lt
Rec
overe
d
%R
esu
lt
Rec
overy
(%
)
As such Test 20.0
20
ND NA
10% 20.4 1.0 20 0.5082 0.0508 13.05 0.0510 0.0510 100.35
20% 20.4 2.0 20 1.0164 0.1016 25.58 0.0999 0.0999 98.29
40% 20.4 4.0 20 2.0327 0.2033 51.4 0.2008 0.2008 98.78
100% 20.2 10.0 20 5.0818 0.5082 128.52 0.5070 0.5070 99.77
200% 20.5 Used 10ppm soln. 10.1635 1.0164 259.9 1.0104 1.0104 99.41
Stability of solutions
Standard solution and sample solution spiked with impurities were prepared and analyzed
initially and at different time intervals by keeping the solutions at room temperature (~ 25°C).
Experimental results show that Standard solution is stable up to 24 hours at 25°C+2°C and
sample solution is also stable at 25°C+2°C.
CONCLUSION
A reverse phase stability indicating HPLC method was developed and validated for the
quantitative determination of related substances of Bosutinib Monohydrate. The present
research work will help the manufacturers and suppliers of Bosutinib Monohydrate to
quantify and qualify the quality in terms of purity based on experimental results. Thus, it can
be used for routine analysis, quality control and for determining quality during the stability
studies of pharmaceutical analysis.
www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │
854
Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I am thankful to analytical development department of BDR Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd. for
providing me research facility for this project.
REFERENCES
1. "Bosulif (bosutinib) dosing, indications, interactions, adverse effects, and
more". Medscape Reference. WebMD. Retrieved, 2014; 3.
2. Daud AI, Krishnamurthi SS, Saleh MN, Gitlitz BJ, Borad MJ, Gold PJ, et al.
(February). "Phase I study of bosutinib, a src/abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor, administered to
patients with advanced solid tumors". Clinical Cancer Research, 2012; 18(4): 1092–100.
doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2378. PMID 22179664.
3. "Bosutinib". livertox.nih.gov.
4. Cortes JE, Kantarjian HM, Brümmendorf TH, Kim DW, Turkina AG, Shen ZX, et al.
(October). "Safety and efficacy of bosutinib (SKI-606) in chronic phase Philadelphia
chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia patients with resistance or intolerance to
imatinib". Blood, 2011; 118(17): 4567–76. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-05-
355594. PMC 4916618. PMID 21865346.
5. Cortes JE, Kim DW, Kantarjian HM, Brümmendorf TH, Dyagil I, Griskevicius L, et al.
(October). "Bosutinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid
leukemia: results from the BELA trial". Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2012; 30(28):
3486–92. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.38.7522. PMC 4979199. PMID 22949154.
6. "Bosulif Approved for Previously Treated Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic
Myelogenous Leukemia", 2012; 5.
7. "Bosulif : EPAR - Product Information" (PDF). European Medicines Agency. Pfitzer Ltd,
2013, 2014; 3: 9.
8. The International Conference on Harmonization, Q3A(R2), Impurities in New Drug
Substances: Text and Methodology, 2006.
9. The International Conference on Harmonization, Q2 (R1), Validation of Analytical
Procedure: Text and Methodology, 2005.