method development and validation for related …

17
www.wjpps.com Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal 838 METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED SUBSTANCES OF BOSUTINIB MONOHYDRATE BY RP-HPLC METHOD Yogendra B. Parmar*, Dharmesh Shah, Yashraj A. Majmudar, Ketul C. Kaka, Arpan S. Patel, Pankaj D. Kankad and Uday G. Sartanpara BDR Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd. R.S No.578, Near Effluent Channel, Luna Village, Taluka-Padra, Vadodara District, Gujrat-391440, India. ABSTRACT An accurate, sensitive and rapid gradient reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method has been developed and validated for related substances of Bosutinib monohydrate. HPLC analysis was performed on Inertsil ODS 3V (250 x 4.6) mm, 5 m. Column temperature maintained at 40°C conditions. Chromatographic separation was achieved with mobile phase gradient program at flow rate of 0.7mL/min. the injection volume was 15μl. The UV detection wavelength was 250nm. The method suitability was checked and validated according to the ICH guidelines for specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, limit of quantification, limit of detection. Limit of detection each impurity is less than 0.05% w/w indicating that the developed method is highly sensitive. The calibration curve was found to be linear within the concentration range of 0.5μg/mL to 10μg/mL. The regression data for calibration curve shows good linear relationship. Correl coefficient (r 2 ) of each impurity is greater than 0.9991. The experiment results are given in detail in this research article. KEYWARD: RP-HPLC, Method validation, Method Development, BST, Related substances. WORLD JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES SJIF Impact Factor 7.632 Volume 10, Issue 1, 838-854 Research Article ISSN 2278 – 4357 *Corresponding Author Yogendra B. Parmar BDR Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd. R.S No.578, Near Effluent Channel, Luna Village, Taluka-Padra Vadodara District, Gujrat-391440, India. Article Received on 24 October 2020, Revised on 14 Nov. 2020, Accepted on 04 Dec. 2020 DOI: 10.20959/wjpps20211-17727

Upload: others

Post on 12-Jun-2022

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED …

www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │

838

METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED

SUBSTANCES OF BOSUTINIB MONOHYDRATE BY RP-HPLC

METHOD

Yogendra B. Parmar*, Dharmesh Shah, Yashraj A. Majmudar, Ketul C. Kaka, Arpan

S. Patel, Pankaj D. Kankad and Uday G. Sartanpara

BDR Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd. R.S No.578, Near Effluent Channel, Luna Village, Taluka-Padra,

Vadodara District, Gujrat-391440, India.

ABSTRACT

An accurate, sensitive and rapid gradient reverse phase high

performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method has been

developed and validated for related substances of Bosutinib

monohydrate. HPLC analysis was performed on Inertsil ODS 3V (250

x 4.6) mm, 5 m. Column temperature maintained at 40°C conditions.

Chromatographic separation was achieved with mobile phase gradient

program at flow rate of 0.7mL/min. the injection volume was 15μl.

The UV detection wavelength was 250nm. The method suitability was

checked and validated according to the ICH guidelines for specificity,

linearity, accuracy, precision, limit of quantification, limit of detection.

Limit of detection each impurity is less than 0.05% w/w indicating that

the developed method is highly sensitive. The calibration curve was

found to be linear within the concentration range of 0.5µg/mL to 10µg/mL. The regression

data for calibration curve shows good linear relationship. Correl coefficient (r2) of each

impurity is greater than 0.9991. The experiment results are given in detail in this research

article.

KEYWARD: RP-HPLC, Method validation, Method Development, BST, Related

substances.

WORLD JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES

SJIF Impact Factor 7.632

Volume 10, Issue 1, 838-854 Research Article ISSN 2278 – 4357

*Corresponding Author

Yogendra B. Parmar

BDR Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd.

R.S No.578, Near Effluent

Channel, Luna Village,

Taluka-Padra Vadodara

District, Gujrat-391440,

India.

Article Received on

24 October 2020,

Revised on 14 Nov. 2020,

Accepted on 04 Dec. 2020

DOI: 10.20959/wjpps20211-17727

Page 2: METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED …

www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │

839

Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

INTRODUCTION

Bosutinib Monohydrate is chemically known as 4-(2, 4-dichloro-5-methoxyanilino)-6-

methoxy-7-[3-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl) propoxy] quinoline-3-carbonitrile; hydrate, molecular

formula is C26H31Cl2N5O4 and molecular weight is 548.45g/mole. Bosutinib[3]

marketed

under the trade name Bosulif[1]

is a small molecule and tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for the

treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia. Originally synthesized by Wyeth, it is being

developed by Pfizer.[2,7]

Bosutinib received US FDA and EU European Medicines Agency

approval on September 4, 2012 and 27 March 2013 respectively for the treatment of adult

patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive[6]

(Ph+) chronic myelogenous leukaemia

(CML) with resistance, or intolerance to prior therapy is approved to treat: Chronic

myelogenous leukaemia (CML) that is Philadelphia chromosome positive.[4]

It is used in

patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML. In patients with chronic phase,

accelerated phase, or blastic phase CML that cannot be treated with or that did not respond to

other treatment.

Bosutinib is also being studied in the treatment of other types of cancer.[5]

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The chemical structure of Bosutinib Monohydrate is shown in Figure 1.

N

N

O N

O CN

NH

ClCl

O

H2O

Figure 1: Structure of bosutinib monohydrate.

Molecular formula: C26H31Cl2N5O4

Molecular weight: 548.45g/mol

IUPAC Name: 4-(2, 4-dichloro-5-methoxyanilino)-6-methoxy-7-[3-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)

propoxy] quinoline-3-carbonitrile; hydrate.

Page 3: METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED …

www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │

840

Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

There is no single pharmacopeial monograph available for this drug substance or drug

product and no HPLC method is available in literature for quantification of Bosutinib

Monohydrate related substances. In this research paper, development of HPLC method for

the simultaneous detection and quantitative determination of the four impurities in Bosutinib

Monohydrate drug substance has been reported. The chemical structure of Bosutinib

Monohydrate Related substances Impurity-1 to Impurity-5 are shown in Figure 2.

Name Structure

Impurity-1

O–

N+

O

O

Cl

OCH3

Impurity-2 O

NH OCH3

ClCl

N

Impurity-3 2

3

4

5

1

6

7NO2

O

O

CH3

N

NCH3

8

9

10

1112

Impurity-4 2

3

4

5

1

6

7NH2

O

O

CH3

N

NCH3

8

9

10

11

13

12

Impurity-5

2

3

4

5

1

6

7NH

O

O

CH3

N

NCH3

NCO

NH

ClCl

OCH3

8

9

10

11

13

12

14

15

18

16

17

Figure 2: structure of Bosutinib Monohydrate Related substances Impurity-1 to

Impurity-5.

Page 4: METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED …

www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │

841

Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ) and linearity were established as per

ICH guidelines. The limit of unknown impurity have been considered as 0.3% in accordance

with ICH guideline based on maximum daily dose.[8]

The developed chromatographic method

can resolve related substances with acceptable resolution to achieve good chromatography

and the optimized methodology have been validated to accomplish ICH guidelines on

validation.[9]

Bosutinib monohydrate related substances impurity-1 to impurity-5 properties

Impurity-1

Molecular Formula : C10H8Cl2N2O2

Molecular Weight : 259.089g/mol

Chemical Name: 2-Cyano-N-(2, 4-Dichloro-5-methoxyphenyl) Acetamide

Impurity-2

Molecular Formula : C10H12ClNO4

Molecular Weight : 245.660g/mol

Chemical Name: 2-(3-Chloropropoxy)-1-methoxy-4-nitrobenzene.

Impurity-3

Molecular Formula : C15H23N3O4

Molecular Weight : 309.36g/mol

Chemical Name: 1-[3-(2-methoxy-5-nitrophenoxy) propyl]-4-methylpiperazine

Impurity-4

Molecular Formula : C15H25N3O4

Molecular Weight : 279.38g/mol

Chemical Name: 1-[3-(2-methoxy-5-aminophenoxy) propyl]-4-methylpiperazine

Impurity-5

Molecular Formula : C26H31N5O4Cl2

Molecular Weight : 248.46g/mol

Chemical Name: {E}-2-cyano-{N}-(2, 4-dichloro-5-methoxyphenyl)-3-[4-methoxy-3-[3-(4-

methylpiperazin-1-yl) propoxy] anilino] prop-2-enamide

Instrumentation and Chromatographic conditions

A Thermo scientific Ultimate 3000 HPLC with PDA detector was used for separation and

detection of analyte. Data was collected using CHROMELION software. HPLC analysis was

performed on column Inertsil ODS 3V (250 x 4.6) mm, 5 m. Column temperature

Page 5: METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED …

www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │

842

Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

maintained at 40°C conditions. Chromatographic separation was achieved with mobile phase

gradient program at flow rate of 0.7mL/min. the injection volume was 15μl. The UV

detection wavelength was 250nm.

Buffer preparation: 20mM Potassium Dihydrogen Orthophosphate. Adjust pH=7.0 ± 0.05

with triethylamine and mix well.

Mobile Phase-A: Buffer: Methanol (80:20) (V/V)

Mobile Phase-B: Methanol: Acetonitrile (65:35) (V/V)

Gradient programme

Time (min) Mobile Phase A (%) Mobile Phase B (%)

0.0 50 50

12.0 50 50

40.0 0 100

48.0 0 100

49.0 50 50

60.0 50 50

Preparation of solutions

Diluent: Water: Acetonitrile: Methanol (25:50:25) (V/V/V)

Standard stock solution: Accurately weigh and transfer about 50mg of BST working or

reference standard into 50mL volumetric flask. Add 25mL of diluent and sonicate to dissolve

and dilute up to mark with diluent. Further dilute 3.0mL of this solution into 100mL

volumetric flask and dilute up to mark with diluent and mix well.

Standard solution: Transfer 1.0mL of standard stock solution into 10mL volumetric flask

and dilute up to mark with diluent and mixed well.

Test solution: Accurately weigh and transfer about 50mg of test sample into 50mL

volumetric flask. Add 25mL of diluent and sonicate to dissolve and dilute up to mark with

diluent and mix well.

System suitability criteria

1. %RSD for Bosutinib peak area from six replicate standard and with bracketing standard

solution should not be more than 5.0%.

2. Theoretical plates for Bosutinib in standard solution should not be less than 2000.

3. Tailing factor for Bosutinib in standard solution should not be more than 2.0.

Page 6: METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED …

www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │

843

Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

RT, RRT & RRF are mentioned in below table.

Name of content ~ RT (min) RRT RRF

Impurity-1 20.40 0.74 0.43

Impurity-2 11.13 0.41 0.64

Impurity-3 13.90 0.51 0.39

Impurity-4 6.45 0.24 0.26

Impurity-5 35.75 1.30 0.38

Bosutinib (BST) 27.84 1.00 --

Calculation

AT WS 3 1 50 1 P

%Known impurity= --------X--------- X -------- X-------X --------X---------X-------X 100

AS 50 100 10 WT RRF 100

AU WS 3 1 50 P

% Unknown impurity= --------X--------- X -------- X-------X --------X---------X 100

AS 50 100 10 WT 100

Total impurities = Sum of all known impurities + unknown impurities.

Where,

AT = Area of known impurity from test solution chromatogram.

AU = Area of unknown impurity from test solution chromatogram.

AS = Average area of six replicate of standard solution.

WS = Weight of working/ reference standard in mg.

WT = Weight of test sample in mg.

P = Potency of standard

RRF= Relative response factor.

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Selection of detection wavelength

The sensitivity of RP-HPLC method with UV detection depends upon proper selection of

detection wavelength. An ideal wavelength is one that gives good response for the drugs that

are to be detected. BST showed maximum absorption at 250nm and it was selected as

detection wavelength for RP-HPLC analysis.

Optimization of mobile phase

Proper selection of HPLC method depends upon the nature of the sample (ionic, ionizable or

neutral molecule), its molecular weight and solubility. The drug selected for the present study

is polar in nature and hence either reversed phase or ion pair or ion-exchange

Page 7: METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED …

www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │

844

Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

chromatography can be used. Reversed phase HPLC was selected for the initial separation

because of its simplicity and suitability. The optimization of mobile phase was to resolve

chromatographic peaks for active drug ingredients with less asymmetric factor. There were

many mobile phases that we tried to resolve peaks, in that first mobile phase-A with 20mM

KH2PO4, pH 2.5 and mobile phase-B with acetonitrile but impurity-3 peak was found gradient

pattern for BST. To improve these, mobile phase-A with buffer (20mM KH2PO4, pH 7.0):

Methanol (80:20 v/v) and mobile phase-B with methanol but all peaks were found very poor.

Further improve these combination of mobile phase were tried in that mobile phase-A with

buffer (20mM KH2PO4, pH 7.0): Methanol (80:20 v/v) and mobile phase-B with methanol:

acetonitrile (50:50 v/v), were tried but we found impurity-4 peak near dad volume and

baseline not proper. Further improve these combination of mobile phase were tried in that

mobile phase-A with buffer (20mM KH2PO4, pH 7.0): Methanol (80:20 v/v) and mobile

phase-B with methanol: acetonitrile (65:35 v/v), with gradient program was found to give a

good resolution and symmetric peaks for BST and all related substances as shown in Figure4.

Figure 4: Chromatogram of Blank and BST mix standard with mobile phase-A with

buffer (20mM KH2PO4, pH 7.0): Methanol (80:20 v/v) and mobile phase-B with

methanol: acetonitrile (65:35 v/v) gradient program.

Page 8: METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED …

www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │

845

Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Method validation

The proposed method was subjected to validation for various parameters like Specificity,

precision, LOD, LOQ, linearity and accuracy in accordance with international conference on

harmonization guidelines.

Specificity

Specificity is the ability to assessing unequivocally of analytic in the presence of components

which may be expected to be present. For determination of specificity, blank, all individual

related substances solutions were prepared and injected to confirm the individual retention

times. The solutions of BST drug substance (Control Sample) and BST spiked with known

related substances at specification level (Spiked Sample) were prepared and injected into

HPLC. Peak purity was established by using Chromeleon Software. A typical representative

HPLC chromatogram of BST drug substance spiked with all related substances is shown in

Figure 5. The specificity results are tabulated in Table 1.

Preparation

Standard stock solution: Weigh accurately about 10.0mg of Bosutinib Monohydrate

working or reference standard into a 100mL volumetric flask. Add diluent and sonicate to

dissolve and dilute up to mark with diluent.

Standard solution

Further dilute 1mL Standard Stock Solution into 100mL volumetric flask and dilute up to

mark with diluent mix well. (Concentration of Bosutinib Monohydrate i.e. to 1ppm).

Test and Test spike preparation describe in accuracy parameter. And all individual related

substances preparation from stock solution of precision parameter.

Page 9: METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED …

www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │

846

Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Figure 5: A typical representative HPLC chromatogram of BST drug substance spiked

with related substances.

Table 1: Specificity experiment results.

Name of content ~ RT (min) RRT Peak purity match

Impurity-1 20.40 0.74 968

Impurity-2 11.13 0.41 1000

Impurity-3 13.90 0.51 990

Impurity-4 6.45 0.24 999

Impurity-5 35.75 1.30 995

Bosutinib (BST) 27.84 1.00 994

BST Sample Spike - - 995

System suitability

System suitability test was an integral part of the method development to verify that the

system is adequate for analysis of BST to be performed. Six replicate injections of standard

preparation were injected, then asymmetry, number of theoretical plates and relative standard

deviation of peak area were determined. The system suitability results are shown in Table 2.

Preparation

As per specificity parameter.

Table 2: system suitability experiment results.

Standard BST Area

Injection -1 99.01

Injection -2 99.25

Injection -3 98.75

Mean 99.00

%RSD 0.25

Tailing factor 1.00

Theoretical plates 57284

Page 10: METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED …

www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │

847

Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Precision

The Repeatability of sample application was assessed by Transferring 1 mL from standard

stock solutions of BST into a 100 mL volumetric flask and diluted up to the mark with

diluent to get the concentration of 1μg/mL of BST, impurity-1, impurity-2, impurity-3,

impurity-4 and impurity-5. This standard solution was chromatographed for 60 minutes using

mobile phase gradient at a flow rate of 0.7mL/min for three times. All the Results were

reported in terms of % RSD. The precision preparation and experiments results are given in

Table 3.

Table 3: Precision preparation and experiment results.

Name Area

Imp-1 Imp-2 Imp-3 Imp-4 Imp-5 BST

Injection -1 41.51 64.39 38.14 23.85 37.94 99.01

Injection -2 42.65 63.76 37.83 23.47 38.93 99.25

Injection -3 41.48 64.24 38.51 24.05 36.84 98.75

Mean 41.88 64.13 38.16 23.79 37.90 99.00

%RSD 1.59 0.51 0.89 1.24 2.76 0.25

LOD, LOQ

The limit of detection and limit of quantitation shall be determined based on Standard

deviation of response and slop value obtained from the linearity study of related substance for

impurity-1, impurity-2, impurity-3, impurity-4, impurity-5 and BST. LOD and LOQ values

are presented in Table 4.1 to Table 4.6.

Linearity

The linearity of analytical method is its ability to elicit test results that are directly

proportional to concentration of analyte in sample within given range. The linearity is

expressed in terms of correlation co-efficient of linear regression analysis. Prepare the

solution to gate concentration 0.5-10µg/mL for impurity-1, impurity-2, impurity-3, impurity-

Impurity

Name

Wt.

(mg)

Dilution

(mL)

Taken

mL

Dilution (mL)

(stock-2)

Taken

mL

Dilution

(mL)

Conc.

in ppm

BST 20.514 20 1

100 1 10

1.0257

Impurity-1 20.312 20 1 1.0156

Impurity-2 20.265 20 1 1.0133

Impurity-3 20.125 20 1 1.0063

Impurity-4 20.327 20 1 1.0164

Impurity-5 20.221 20 1 1.0111

Page 11: METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED …

www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │

848

Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

4, impurity-5 and BST. The graph was plotted for peak area vs. conc. for the drug. The

statistical values are presented in Table 4.1 to Table 4.6 and Figure 6.

Table 4.1: Statistical evaluation of linearity and LOD/LOQ for Bosutinib.

ppm mL of stock-2 solution Dilution Actual. ppm Bosutinib

Area

0.500 0.5 10 0.5129 50.36

1.000 1.0 10 1.0257 99.25

2.000 2.0 10 2.0514 234.76

5.000 5.0 10 5.1285 521.47

10.00 Used as such stock-2 solution 10.2570 1047.20

Slope 101.7076

Intercept 4.6175

Correlation Coefficient (r2) 0.9991

STEYX 14.3802

LOD (ppm) 0.4666

LOQ (ppm) 1.4139

LOD (%) 0.0467

LOQ (%) 0.1414

Table 4.2: Statistical evaluation of linearity and LOD/LOQ for Impurity-1.

ppm mL of stock-2 solution Dilution Actual. ppm Impurity-1

Area

0.500 0.5 10 0.5078 23.31

1.000 1.0 10 1.0156 41.63

2.000 2.0 10 2.0312 89.98

5.000 5.0 10 5.0780 223.39

10.00 Used as such stock-2 solution 10.1560 440.83

Slope 43.4592

Intercept 0.5205

Correlation Coefficient (r2) 0.9999

STEYX 2.3796

LOD (ppm) 0.1807

LOQ (ppm) 0.5476

LOD (%) 0.0181

LOQ (%) 0.0548

RRF 0.43

Table 4.3: Statistical evaluation of linearity and LOD/LOQ for Impurity-2.

ppm mL of stock-2 solution Dilution Actual. ppm Impurity-2

Area

0.500 0.5 10 0.5066 33.06

1.000 1.0 10 1.0133 64.97

2.000 2.0 10 2.0265 133.75

5.000 5.0 10 5.0663 326.63

10.00 Used as such stock-2 solution 10.1325 657.73

Page 12: METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED …

www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │

849

Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Slope 64.8324

Intercept 0.1687

Correlation Coefficient (r2) 1.0000

STEYX 1.8302

LOD (ppm) 0.0932

LOQ (ppm) 0.2823

LOD (%) 0.0093

LOQ (%) 0.0282

RRF 0.64

Table 4.4: Statistical evaluation of linearity and LOD/LOQ for Impurity-3.

ppm mL of stock-2 solution Dilution Actual. ppm Impurity-3

Area

0.500 0.5 10 0.5031 20.31

1.000 1.0 10 1.0063 40.00

2.000 2.0 10 2.0125 80.63

5.000 5.0 10 5.0313 199.83

10.00 Used as such stock-2 solution 10.0625 402.94

Slope 40.0127

Intercept -0.2307

Correlation Coefficient (r2) 1.0000

STEYX 0.8470

LOD (ppm) 0.0699

LOQ (ppm) 0.2117

LOD (%) 0.0070

LOQ (%) 0.0212

RRF 0.39

Table 4.5: Statistical evaluation of linearity and LOD/LOQ for Impurity-4.

ppm mL of stock-2 solution Dilution Actual. ppm Impurity-4

Area

0.500 0.5 10 0.5082 11.35

1.000 1.0 10 1.0164 23.26

2.000 2.0 10 2.0327 50.44

5.000 5.0 10 5.0818 128.30

10.00 Used as such stock-2 solution 10.1635 263.68

Slope 26.1598

Intercept -2.9684

Correlation Coefficient (r2) 0.9999

STEYX 1.2411

LOD (ppm) 0.1566

LOQ (ppm) 0.4744

LOD (%) 0.0157

LOQ (%) 0.0474

RRF 0.26

Page 13: METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED …

www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │

850

Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Table 4.6: Statistical evaluation of linearity and LOD/LOQ for Impurity-5.

ppm mL of stock-2 solution Dilution Actual. ppm Impurity-5

Area

0.500 0.5 10 0.5055 20.51

1.000 1.0 10 1.0111 38.13

2.000 2.0 10 2.0221 76.26

5.000 5.0 10 5.0553 195.34

10.00 Used as such stock-2 solution 10.1105 392.54

Slope 38.8701

Intercept -0.85333

Correlation Coefficient (r2) 1.0000

STEYX 1.3541

LOD (ppm) 0.1150

LOQ (ppm) 0.3484

LOD (%) 0.0115

LOQ (%) 0.0348

RRF 0.38

Page 14: METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED …

www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │

851

Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Figure 6: Linearity plot for BST and Related substances Impurity-1 to Impurity-5.

Accuracy

The accuracy of the method was determined by analyzing BST samples spiked with related

substances at different levels (10%, 20%, 40%, 100% and 200% of specification levels). The

percentage recovery values for all the impurities are calculated and tabulated in Table 5.1 to

table 5.6.

Standard solution

As per specificity parameter.

Page 15: METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED …

www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │

852

Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Table 5.1: Accuracy preparation.

Impurity Name Wt. (mg) Dilution (mL) Taken

mL

Dilution (mL)

(Recovery stock)

Conc. in

ppm

Impurity-1 20.312 20 5

50

101.560

Impurity-2 20.265 20 5 101.325

Impurity-3 20.125 20 5 100.625

Impurity-4 20.327 20 5 101.635

Impurity-5 20.221 20 5 101.105

Table 5.2: Accuracy system suitability standard solution.

Standard BST Area

Injection -1 99.01

Injection -2 99.25

Injection -3 98.75

Mean 99.00

%RSD 0.25

Table 5.3: Accuracy for impurity-1.

Rec

overy

L

evel

Des

ign

ati

on

Wei

gh

t of

Sam

ple

(mg)

mL

of

Rec

ov

ery

stock

solu

tion

Dil

uti

on

(m

L)

Act

ual

Con

. (p

pm

)

Act

ual

Ad

ded

Am

ou

nt

(%)

Are

a

% R

esu

lt

Rec

overe

d

%R

esu

lt

Rec

overy

(%

)

As such Test 20.0

20

9.32 0.0225

10% 20.4 1.0 20 0.5078 26.39 26.39 0.0623 0.0398 78.38

20% 20.4 2.0 20 1.0156 44.98 44.98 0.1062 0.0837 82.41

40% 20.4 4.0 20 2.0312 89.7 89.7 0.2119 0.1894 93.25

100% 20.2 10.0 20 5.0780 216.35 216.35 0.5161 0.4936 97.20

200% 20.5 Used 10ppm soln. 10.1560 1.0156 436.98 1.0272 1.0047 98.93

Table 5.4: Accuracy for impurity-2.

Rec

overy

L

evel

Des

ign

ati

on

Wei

gh

t of

Sam

ple

(mg)

mL

of

Rec

ov

ery

stock

solu

tion

Dil

uti

on

(m

L)

Act

ual

Con

. (p

pm

)

Act

ual

Ad

ded

Am

ou

nt

(%)

Are

a

% R

esu

lt

Rec

overe

d

%R

esu

lt

Rec

overy

(%

)

As such Test 20.0

20

ND NA

10% 20.4 1.0 20 0.5066 0.0507 30.81 0.0489 0.0489 96.53

20% 20.4 2.0 20 1.0133 0.1013 54.66 0.0867 0.0867 85.56

40% 20.4 4.0 20 2.0265 0.2027 114.69 0.1820 0.1820 89.81

100% 20.2 10.0 20 5.0663 0.5066 328.63 0.5267 0.5267 103.96

200% 20.5 Used 10ppm soln. 10.1325 1.0133 652.51 1.0305 1.0305 101.70

Page 16: METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED …

www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │

853

Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Table 5.5: Accuracy for impurity-3. R

ecovery

L

evel

Des

ign

ati

on

Wei

gh

t of

Sam

ple

(mg)

mL

of

Rec

ov

ery

stock

solu

tion

Dil

uti

on

(m

L)

Act

ual

Con

. (p

pm

)

Act

ual

Ad

ded

Am

ou

nt

(%)

Are

a

% R

esu

lt

Rec

overe

d

%R

esu

lt

Rec

overy

(%

)

As such Test 20.0

20

ND NA

10% 20.4 1.0 20 0.5031 0.0503 17.21 0.0448 0.0448 89.05

20% 20.4 2.0 20 1.0063 0.1006 35.37 0.0921 0.0921 91.52

40% 20.4 4.0 20 2.0125 0.2013 75.64 0.1970 0.1970 97.89

100% 20.2 10.0 20 5.0313 0.5031 188.4 0.4955 0.4955 98.48

200% 20.5 Used 10ppm soln. 10.0625 1.0063 389.5 1.0095 1.0095 100.32

Table 5.6: Accuracy for impurity-4

Rec

overy

L

evel

Des

ign

ati

on

Wei

gh

t of

Sam

ple

(mg)

mL

of

Rec

ov

ery

stock

solu

tion

Dil

uti

on

(m

L)

Act

ual

Con

. (p

pm

)

Act

ual

Ad

ded

Am

ou

nt

(%)

Are

a

% R

esu

lt

Rec

overe

d

%R

esu

lt

Rec

overy

(%

)

As such Test 20.0

20

ND NA

10% 20.4 1.0 20 0.5082 0.0508 13.05 0.0510 0.0510 100.35

20% 20.4 2.0 20 1.0164 0.1016 25.58 0.0999 0.0999 98.29

40% 20.4 4.0 20 2.0327 0.2033 51.4 0.2008 0.2008 98.78

100% 20.2 10.0 20 5.0818 0.5082 128.52 0.5070 0.5070 99.77

200% 20.5 Used 10ppm soln. 10.1635 1.0164 259.9 1.0104 1.0104 99.41

Stability of solutions

Standard solution and sample solution spiked with impurities were prepared and analyzed

initially and at different time intervals by keeping the solutions at room temperature (~ 25°C).

Experimental results show that Standard solution is stable up to 24 hours at 25°C+2°C and

sample solution is also stable at 25°C+2°C.

CONCLUSION

A reverse phase stability indicating HPLC method was developed and validated for the

quantitative determination of related substances of Bosutinib Monohydrate. The present

research work will help the manufacturers and suppliers of Bosutinib Monohydrate to

quantify and qualify the quality in terms of purity based on experimental results. Thus, it can

be used for routine analysis, quality control and for determining quality during the stability

studies of pharmaceutical analysis.

Page 17: METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELATED …

www.wjpps.com │ Vol 10, Issue 1, 2021. │ ISO 9001:2015 Certified Journal │

854

Parmar et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I am thankful to analytical development department of BDR Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd. for

providing me research facility for this project.

REFERENCES

1. "Bosulif (bosutinib) dosing, indications, interactions, adverse effects, and

more". Medscape Reference. WebMD. Retrieved, 2014; 3.

2. Daud AI, Krishnamurthi SS, Saleh MN, Gitlitz BJ, Borad MJ, Gold PJ, et al.

(February). "Phase I study of bosutinib, a src/abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor, administered to

patients with advanced solid tumors". Clinical Cancer Research, 2012; 18(4): 1092–100.

doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2378. PMID 22179664.

3. "Bosutinib". livertox.nih.gov.

4. Cortes JE, Kantarjian HM, Brümmendorf TH, Kim DW, Turkina AG, Shen ZX, et al.

(October). "Safety and efficacy of bosutinib (SKI-606) in chronic phase Philadelphia

chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia patients with resistance or intolerance to

imatinib". Blood, 2011; 118(17): 4567–76. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-05-

355594. PMC 4916618. PMID 21865346.

5. Cortes JE, Kim DW, Kantarjian HM, Brümmendorf TH, Dyagil I, Griskevicius L, et al.

(October). "Bosutinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid

leukemia: results from the BELA trial". Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2012; 30(28):

3486–92. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.38.7522. PMC 4979199. PMID 22949154.

6. "Bosulif Approved for Previously Treated Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic

Myelogenous Leukemia", 2012; 5.

7. "Bosulif : EPAR - Product Information" (PDF). European Medicines Agency. Pfitzer Ltd,

2013, 2014; 3: 9.

8. The International Conference on Harmonization, Q3A(R2), Impurities in New Drug

Substances: Text and Methodology, 2006.

9. The International Conference on Harmonization, Q2 (R1), Validation of Analytical

Procedure: Text and Methodology, 2005.