metro general survey results presentation

8/9/2019 Metro General Survey Results Presentation

1/29


2/29

1

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Key Findings

Support for both measures is initially strong and the

intensity of support – those saying definitely yes – increasesfor both measures after education.

Self-reported likely November 2016 voters are lesssupportive of the measures and many of their individual

features than all County residents . However, supportamong self-reported likely November 2016 voters appearsrelatively strong.

The Augmentation/Extension Measure is susceptible to

a simple explanation of what the measure actually does ,after which support drops to below two-thirds.


3/29

2

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Key Findings Continued

To be successful, a measure must include funds for a

package of local roads, freeways and publictransportation improvements .

Specifically: freeway improvements; traffic congestionrelief; keeping fares low for seniors, the disabled and

students; earthquake retrofitting bridges and tunnels;and pothole repairs and local street paving top the listof many important features .

Selecting voter-preferred individual regional projects

can make a difference in passing the measure .


4/29

3

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Key Findings Continued

Concern about the growing population of drivers and the

desire for traffic congestion relief are top reasons whyall residents and self-reported definite voters would be moreinclined to vote yes on a measure.

Metro continues to have more favorable ratings among

all residents and self-reported likely November 2016 votersthan the Los Angeles County MetropolitanTransportation Authority .


5/29

4

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Methodology

Conducted a Random Digit Dial Survey by telephone

(landlines and cell phones) between March 17th

–

March29 th , 2015Interviews with 1,414 Los Angeles County residents ages 18years or olderSurvey was available in English and SpanishSome percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding

Margin of error for the full sample is +/- 2.6% and half the

sample is+/-3.3%Margin of error for each Metro Planning Area is +/-6.9% andhalf sample is +/-9.8%


6/29

5

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Methodology Continued

Margin of error for self-reported registered voterslikely to vote in the November 2016 General Election(n=863) is +/-3.4% and half sample is +/-4.8%

Note: This sample of self-reported registered likelyNov 2016 voters is different from a typical voterpopulation, which is based on actual registrationinformation and voter history.


7/296

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

METRO Planning AreasPlanning Area Largest Cities in the Area SampleSize

Actual %of County

Westside City of Los Angeles, Santa Monica,West Hollywood, Culver City and Beverly Hills 200 13%

South BayCity of Los Angeles, Torrance, Carson,

Inglewood, Redondo Beach andunincorporated sections of Los Angeles County

201 14%

Central City of Los Angeles 204 10%

San Gabriel Valley Pasadena, Pomona, West Covina, Alhambra, Arcadia, Diamond Bar, El Monte, Glendora andunincorporated sections of Los Angeles County

201 19%

San Fernando ValleyBurbank, Calabasas, Glendale,

La Canada/Flintridge, City of Los Angeles,San Fernando, Unincorporated

202 18%

North County Lancaster, City of Los Angeles,Palmdale, Santa Clarita, Unincorporated 205 7%

Southeast

Long Beach, Downey, Lakewood,Norwalk, Compton, Cerritos, Bellflower,Pico Rivera, South Gate, Whittier and

unincorporated sections of Los Angeles County

201 19%

Total 1414 100%


8/297


9/298

Shall voters authorize continuing to advance and improvethe Los Angeles County transportation system, provide trafficcongestion relief, and economic and job growth by: extending

light rail, subway, neighborhood shuttles and bus systems inLos Angeles County; improving connections to jobs, schoolsand local airports; improving freeway and local street trafficflow and safety; repairing potholes; synchronizing local

signals; and keeping seniors, disabled and student fares low;approval augments by one-half cent and extends the existingCounty sales tax, with independent financial audits, andcitizen oversight; all funds controlled locally?

Ballot Summary for the ½-cent Sales Tax

Augmentation/Extension Measure

Q7. If the election were held t oday on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it?


10/299

In 2008, Los Angeles County voters approved aone-half cent traffic relief sales tax for 30 years.The measure I just described would make thatsales tax permanent and increase the countytransportation sales tax by one-half cent.

Brief Explanation of the

Augmentation/Extension Measure

Q8. If the election were held t oday on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it?


11/2910

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

46%

36%

49%

20%

22%

25% 5%

7%

10%

6%

15%

19%

9%

5%

6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Initial Vote

Vote After Explanation

Final Vote After Information

Def. Yes Prob. Yes Und./ Lean Yes Und./Lean No Prob. No Def. No Und.

Seventy percent of self-reported likely voters initiallysay they would vote yes on the augmentation/extensionmeasure. While support drops to below the two-thirds

threshold after receiving a brief explanation of the measure,support exceeds initial vote after more education.

Q7/Q8/Q15 (Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no tooppose it? Split Sample

Total Yes

TotalNo

70% 25%

63% 31%

79% 18%


12/2911

Shall voters authorize continuing to advance and improve theLos Angeles County transportation system, provide trafficcongestion relief, and economic and job growth by: extending

light rail, subway, neighborhood shuttles and bus systems inLos Angeles County; improving connections to jobs, schoolsand local airports; improving freeway and local street trafficflow and safety; repairing potholes; synchronizing local

signals; and keeping seniors, disabled and student fares low;approval increases the County sales tax by one-half cent, withindependent financial audits and citizen oversight; all fundscontrolled locally?

Ballot Summary for the ½-cent Sales Tax

Increase Measure

Q9. If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it?


13/2912

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

42%

48%

26%

23%

5% 7%

5%

13%

17%

7%

5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Initial Vote

Final Vote After Information

Def. Yes Prob. Yes Und./ Lean Yes Und./Lean No Prob. No Def. No Und.

Seventy-two percent of self-reported likely November2016 voters initially support the ½-cent sales tax increase

measure, and overall support remains stable after

education, with “definitely yes” voters increasing by 6%.

Q9/Q16 (Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no tooppose it? Split Sample

Total Yes

TotalNo

72% 21%

73% 23%


14/2913

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

32%

30%

25%

10%

1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

(B) Local street and roadimprovements

(C) Freeway and highwayimprovements

(A) Local and regional lightrail and bus transportation

improvements

Both A and B, A and C,B and C/All

None of them/Other/DK/NA

35%

27%

24%

12%

3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

All three major areas of transportation investmentare considered the top priority by between roughly

one-quarter to one-third of respondents, respectively.

Q10 (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). I am going to read you three uses of existing transportation funding in LA County. Please tellme which one is your top priority for transportation funding.

Self-Reported LikelyNovember 2016 VotersAll Residents


15/2914

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Potential Transportation Featuresby Metro Planning Area

(Ranked by All Residents % Very Important to be included in the measure - 6 or 7 rating)

Q12 (All Residents/Planning Area). I want to return to the transportation sales tax measure we were discussing earlier. I am going to mention somefeatures of the proposed Los Angeles County Measure. Regardless of your opinion of the measure, after I mention each one, please tell me howimportant it is to you that the feature be included as part of the measure. We will use a scale of one to seven, where one means NOT AT ALLIMPORTANT to you that the feature or provision is included in the measure and seven means it would be VERY IMPORTANT. ^Not part of Split Sample

Features AllResidents Westside SouthBay Central SGV SFV NorthCounty Southeast

Earthquake retrofitting bridges,tunnels and overpasses 81% 81% 81% 77% 83% 83% 75% 83%

Improving freeway traffic flow on the 5,10, 14, 60, 101, 110, 138, 210, 405,

605 and the 710 freeways80% 78% 78% 78% 83% 83% 70% 79%

Keeping seniors, disabledand student fares low 79% 70% 79% 78% 84% 80% 84% 81%

Preventing polluted toxic roadway runofffrom entering storm drains and flowinginto creeks, rivers and coastal waters

and onto County beaches

79% 83% 82% 84% 77% 72% 80% 83%

Repairing potholes andrepaving local streets 79% 78% 76% 86% 77% 76% 81% 83%

Improving freeway traffic flow 78% 80% 77% 80% 73% 75% 85% 82%

Continuing to advance and improve theLos Angeles County transportation

system to provide traffic congestion relief75% 77% 69% 81% 79% 66% 86% 76%


16/2915

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Continued


Features AllResidents WestsideSouth

Bay Central SGV SFVNorth

County Southeast

Widening freeways to improve traffic flow 75% 62% 71% 83% 82% 75% 82% 73%

Improving connections to jobs,schools and local airports 72% 77% 72% 77% 71% 61% 63% 80%

Improving safety on buses and light raillines, and at bus stops and rail stations 70% 73% 80% 79% 73% 49% 71% 72%

Improving van service for seniors,the disabled and veterans 70% 57% 64% 75% 73% 68% 75% 79%

Improving freeway safety 70% 53% 82% 73% 68% 63% 71% 79%

Adding and upgrading crosswalksand sidewalks to improve

student and pedestrian safety70% 64% 64% 78% 69% 68% 73% 74%

Synchronizing signals inevery area of the County 68% 63% 68% 65% 65% 68% 63% 79%

Reducing diesel emissions fromtrucks and trains 67% 60% 66% 80% 72% 53% 61% 78%

Continuing to advance and improve theLos Angeles County transportation system

to help economic and job growth66% 63% 61% 73% 68% 61% 67% 73%

(Ranked by All Residents % Very Important to be included in the measure 6 or 7 rating)


17/2916

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Continued


Features AllResidents WestsideSouth

Bay Central SGV SFVNorth

County Southeast

Improving safety at rail crossings 65% 58% 59% 78% 65% 58% 76% 71%

Improving the flow and safety of trucktraffic on freeways and roads near thePorts of Los Angeles and Long Beach

64% 59% 58% 66% 63% 65% 71% 71%

Connecting public transit toLAX, Burbank, Long Beach

and Palmdale airports64% 61% 57% 80% 55% 70% 73% 65%

Upgrading freeway on- andoff-ramps to improve traffic flow 64% 66% 49% 78% 60% 56% 72% 73%

Synchronizing local signals 64% 60% 69% 71% 58% 64% 56% 71%

Upgrading and redesigning local streetsto balance motorist concerns with better

and safer access for pedestrians,bicycles and bus travel

63% 64% 60% 72% 63% 56% 64% 68%

Extending light rail, subway and busservice in Los Angeles County 63% 59% 63% 71% 68% 51% 55% 69%

^Extending the light rail systemto more places in the County 62% 59% 61% 65% 68% 51% 66% 65%

Improving and expandingMetrolink service 61% 54% 58% 73% 65% 48% 66% 67%

(Ranked by All Residents % Very Important to be included in the measure 6 or 7 rating)


18/29


19/2918

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

44%

42%

47%

44%

29%

29%

27%

35%

5%

5%

18%

21%

18%

13%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents

Self-Reported Likely

Nov 2016 Voters

All Residents

Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters

Much More Lkly. Smwt. More Lkly. Smwt. Less Lkly. Much Less Lkly. No Diff. DK/NATotal

MoreLkly.

Total

LessLkly.

74% 5%

71% 6%

73% 7%

79% 7%

West Los Angeles residents and self-reported likely November 2016voters are more likely to vote for the measure if the Crenshaw LAX Light

Rail Line is extended and traffic flow on the 10 freeway is improved.

Q13 a-e (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last li st I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now liketo read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will befunded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 1 – West Los Angeles County)

(Ranked by All Residents Total More Likely Vote for the Measure)

Extending the MetroCrenshaw LAX Rail Line,

which is currently underconstruction, to the Metro

Purple Line on Wilshire andthrough West Hollywood to the

Metro Red Line in Hollywood

Improving the traffic flow alongthe 10 freeway between the

405 freeway and downtown Lby widening the road at key

bottlenecks and upgrading theon- and off-ramps


20/2919

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

38%

37%

35%

35%

24%

16%

26%

19%

27%

25%

28%

38%

8%

13%

6%

11%

7%

11%

15%

26%

27%

30%

27%

21%

21%

5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents


All Residents


All Residents


Much More Lkly. Smwt. More Lkly. Smwt. Less Lkly. Much Less Lkly. No Diff. DK/NA

TotalMoreLkly.

TotalLessLkly.

64% 8%

56% 16%

62% 5%

60% 10%

52% 22%

54% 22%

West Los Angeles Continued

Q13 a-e (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last li st I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would nowlike to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service willbe funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 1 – West Los AngelesCounty)


Connecting LAX to theSan Fernando Valley by a subway

line under the Sepulveda Pass

Extending the Metro Purple LineSubway, currently under

construction, beyond UCLA andWestwood toward Santa Monica

Connecting LAX to the SanFernando Valley by a subway line

under the Sepulveda Pass. Thiswould be funded partially by a

new toll Express Lane travellingalong the 405 from LAX to the

Valley in both directions


21/29

20

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

54%

53%

51%

47%

55%

56%

44%

42%

25%

24%

27%

28%

20%

17%

25%

20%

5%

6%

7%

6%

5%

6%

7%

14%

12%

16%

15%

13%

13%

14%

23%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents


All Residents


All Residents


Nov 2016 Voters

All Residents


Much More Lkly. Smwt. More Lkly. Smwt. Less Lkly. Much Less Lkly. No Diff. DK/NATotalMoreLkly.

TotalLessLkly.

78% 5%

77% 8%

78% 4%75% 6%

75% 8%

73% 10%

69% 12%

62% 12%

South Bay residents and self-reported likely November 2016 voters are moreprobable to vote for the measure if it improves traffic flow on major streets inthe area, and local street maintenance and traffic flow along the 405 freeway.

Q13 f-i (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now liketo read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will befunded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 2 – The South Bay)


Improving street maintenance,such as pothole repair, on

major streets throughout theSouth Bay

Removing key bottlenecks andimproving traffic flow on Pacific

Coast Highway, Hawthorne andCrenshaw Boulevards, and

Western Avenue

Improving traffic along the 405freeway between the 105 andthe 110 freeways by widening

the road at key bottlenecks andupgrading the on- and off-ramps

Extending the Metro GreenLight Rail Line south towardsSan Pedro through Redondo

Beach and Torrance


22/29

21

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

55%

39%

58%

44%

54%

44%

48%

34%

24%

28%

18%

23%

17%

17%

20%

22%

6%

6%

7%

8%

5%

5%

8%

11%

17%

15%

20%

17%

22%

16%

22%

6%

8%

6%

6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents


All Residents


All Residents


Nov 2016 Voters

All Residents



TotalLessLkly.

80% 7%

67% 10%

76% 6%66% 6%

71% 9%

62% 10%

69% 12%

56% 16%

Central Los Angeles residents and self-reported likely November 2016voters are more likely to vote for the measure if it extends the Crenshaw

LAX Light Rail Line; improves freeway connections in Downtown; andextends the northbound bus and carpool lane on the 110 freeway.

Q13 j-m (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now liketo read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will befunded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 3 – Central Los Angeles County)


Extending the Metro CrenshawLAX Light Rail Line, which is

currently under construction, tothe Metro Purple Line on Wilshire

and through West Hollywood tothe Metro Red Line in Hollywood

Improving freeway connectionsaround Downtown Los Angeles

on the 5, 10, 60 and 101 freewaysthrough East LA

Extending the northbound bus andcarpool lane on the 110 freeway

past the current bottleneck at Adams Boulevard into DowntownLA, thereby improving traffic flow,

reducing congestion andimproving safety

Establishing frequent bus servicealong Vermont Avenue that

operates in its own dedicatedlane with fewer stops; connecting

South Los Angeles with theMetro Red Line and Purple Linesubway at Wilshire and Vermont


23/29

22

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

52%

48%

49%

41%

48%

42%

49%

43%

19%

18%

21%

21%

19%

23%

17%

14%

5%

8%

8%

7%

11%

5%

9%

17%

19%

20%

16%

22%

16%

20%

17%

6%

7%

7%

5%

6%

7%

8%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents


All Residents


All Residents


All Residents



TotalLessLkly.

71% 6%

66% 8%

70% 7%

62% 15%

67% 7%

65% 13%

66% 8%

57% 18%

Within each respective group, there are no statistical differencesin the likelihood of voting with respect to each San Gabriel Valley

project, with one exception - upgrading the 71 Freeway scoreslowest among self-reported likely November 2016 voters.

Q13 n-q (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last l ist I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now liketo read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will befunded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 4 – San Gabriel Valley)


Extending the Metro Gold LightRail Line further east from East LA

along the 60 freeway towards the605 freeway in South El Monte

Connecting North Hollywood,Burbank, Glendale and Pasadena

by light rail

Extending the Metro Gold LightRail Line which is currently under

construction to Azusa, further eastthrough Glendora and San Dimastoward Claremont

Upgrading the 71 freeway from afour- and six-lane expressway to

an eight-lane freeway betweenMission Boulevard and the

60 freeway in Pomona


24/29

23

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

53%

53%

50%

42%

27%

23%

29%

16% 11% 12%

9%

17%

14%

18%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents


All Residents



TotalLessLkly.

80% 7%

76% 6%

79% 7%

59% 23%

San Fernando Valley residents and self-reported likely November2016 voters are more likely to vote for the measure if it improves

traffic flow on the 101 freeway and connects the San Fernando Valleyto LAX by a subway line under the Sepulveda Pass.

Q13 r-v (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would nowlike to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service willbe funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 5 – San Fernando Valley)


Improving the traffic flow alongthe 101 freeway between the

Ventura County line and theHollywood Freeway in

Universal City by widening theroad at key bottlenecks andupgrading the on- and off-ramps

Connecting the San FernandoValley to LAX by a subway line

under the Sepulveda Pass


25/29

24

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

49%

56%

44%

33%

37%

31%

28%

19%

21%

21%

19%

12%

7%

8%

8%

8%

14%

18%

7%

10%

7%

11%

16%

25%

23%

36%

5%

5%

5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents


All Residents


All Residents



TotalLessLkly.

77% 16%

75% 20%

65% 13%

53% 18%

56% 15%

43% 18%

San Fernando Valley Continued

Q13 r-v (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would nowlike to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that t his project or service willbe funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 5 – San Fernando Valley)


Connecting theSan Fernando Valley to LAX

by a subway line under theSepulveda Pass. This wouldbe funded partially by a new

toll Express Lane travellingalong the 405 from the Valley

to LAX in both directions

Converting the Metro OrangeLine Busway to a light rail line

connecting Woodland Hills,North Hollywood, the Burbank

Airport, Pasadena and theGreater San Gabriel Valley

Creating a dedicated light railalong Van Nuys Boulevard

connecting Sylmar andVan Nuys Civic Center

through the communities ofPanorama City, Pacoima and

the of San Fernando

Wi hi h i h i i l


26/29

25

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

51%

42%

41%

36%

21%

26%

30%

30%

5%

5%

10%

7%

15%

18%

14%

17%

5%

6%

8%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents


All Residents



TotalLessLkly.

72% 8%

68% 7%

71% 11%

67% 8%

Within each respective group, there are no statisticaldifferences in the likelihood of voting with respect to each

North County project, with one exception – improvingstreets near the hospital and medical buildings scores

lowest among self-reported likely November 2016 voters.

Q13 w-z (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would nowlike to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service willbe funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 6 – North County) (N=205)


Improving the traffic flowalong the I-5 freeway in Santa

Clarita, Newhall and Castaic

by widening the road at keybottlenecks and upgradingthe on- and off-ramps northof the 5 and 14 interchange

Building a new highway, alsoknown as the High Desert

Corridor, between the14 freeway in Palmdale and

15 freeway in Victorville,which would be located northof the 138 through Palmdale,

Littlerock, Sun Village andLake Los Angeles


27/29

26

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

44%

36%

47%

41%

27%

19%

20%

25%

7%

6%

5%

16%

28%

18%

20%

10%

7%

8%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents


All Residents



TotalLessLkly.

70% 10%

55% 8%

66% 8%

67% 6%

North County Continued

Q13 w-z (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would nowlike to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service willbe funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 6 – North County) (N=205)


Improving existing streets andconstructing new streets to

the regional Antelope ValleyHospital and surrounding medicalfacilities in Lancaster to increase

access for emergency vehicles,

patients and visitors

Improving the traffic flow along the14 freeway by widening the road

at key bottlenecks, includingimproving the Avenue S bridge

in Palmdale and upgrading the on-and off-ramps north of the I-5 and

14 interchange in Canyon Country

S th t L A l C t id t d lf t d


28/29

27

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

53%

57%

49%

52%

49%

50%

36%

43%

23%

22%

26%

23%

23%

19%

29%

13%

5%

5%

5%

5%

7%

12%

9%

12%

13%

14%

17%

23%

31%

6%

5%

5%

7%

6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents


All Residents


All Residents


All Residents


Much More Lkly. Smwt. More Lkly. Smwt. Less Lkly. Much Less Lkly. No Diff. DK/NA

TotalMoreLkly.

TotalLessLkly.

76% 6%

79% 9%

75% 8%

75% 9%

72% 8%

68% 11%

64% 6%

57% 7%

Southeast Los Angeles County residents and self-reportedlikely November 2016 voters are more likely to support the

measure if it adds a carpool and a regular lane on the 5 freeway,improves traffic flow along the 710 freeway and constructs a

light rail line from downtown to the Orange County line.

Q13 aa-dd (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would

now like to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project orservice will be funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 7 – SoutheastLos Angeles County) (N=201)


Adding a carpool and a regularlane on the 5 freeway betweenthe 605 and the 710 freeways

through Commerce and DowneyImproving the traffic flow along the710 freeway by widening the roadat key bottlenecks and upgrading

the on- and off-ramps betweendowntown LA and the Ports ofLos Angeles and Long Beach

through such southeast cities asBell, South Gate and ParamountConstructing a light rail line from

downtown LA to the Orange

County Line through Paramount,Bellflower and Cerritos

Extending the Metro Gold LightRail Line to East Los Angeles

further east toward Whittier alongWashington Boulevard through

Commerce, Pico Rivera, andMontebello


29/29

12100 Wilsh ire B lvd , Suit e 350Lo s A ng eles , CA 90025Ph o n e (310) 828-1183

Fax (310) 453-6562

Richard [email protected]

For more information, contact:

John [email protected]

metro general survey results presentation

Documents