metropolitan detroit medical library group

18
September 16, 2010 Larissa J. Lucas, MD Senior Deputy Editor, DynaMed

Upload: jin-ratliff

Post on 04-Jan-2016

43 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Metropolitan Detroit Medical Library Group. September 16, 2010 Larissa J. Lucas, MD Senior Deputy Editor, DynaMed. Disclosure. Senior Deputy Editor, DynaMed, EBSCO Publishing, Ipswich, MA Clinical Instructor in Medicine Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Evidence Based Medicine. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Metropolitan Detroit Medical Library Group

September 16, 2010Larissa J. Lucas, MD

Senior Deputy Editor, DynaMed

Page 2: Metropolitan Detroit Medical Library Group

DisclosureSenior Deputy Editor,

DynaMed, EBSCO Publishing, Ipswich, MAClinical Instructor in Medicine

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Page 3: Metropolitan Detroit Medical Library Group

Evidence Based Medicineconscientious, explicit, and judicious use of

current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients

integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research

Sackett DL BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71-2

Page 4: Metropolitan Detroit Medical Library Group

Clinical Expertise and Patient Preference

Haynes RB ACP J Club. 2002 Mar-Apr;136(2):A11-4.

Page 5: Metropolitan Detroit Medical Library Group

Evidence Based Decision Making

Tilburt JC. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):721-5

Page 6: Metropolitan Detroit Medical Library Group

Why we need EBM toolsBarriers to answering clinical questions

Ebell MH. Am Fam Physician. 2009 Feb 15;79(4):293

TimeDoubtCultureAccess

Rising health care costsQuality of careIndustry sponsored studies (BMJ. 2007 Dec 8;335(7631):1202)

Page 7: Metropolitan Detroit Medical Library Group
Page 8: Metropolitan Detroit Medical Library Group

Answering clinical questions112 primary care

physicians3,511 visits with 635

questions22.8% questions were

investigated14% of questions

investigated not answered

time to answer questions 2 minutes during

consultation 32 minutes after

consultation

Ann Fam Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;5(4):345-52.

48 primary care physicians1,062 questions55% questions

investigateddoubt that answer

existed for 11% questions

resource failure in 26%41% of answers were

found easily31% found with difficulty

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Mar-Apr;12(2):217-24

Page 9: Metropolitan Detroit Medical Library Group

How to ask a questionCochrane systematic

review4 trials

PICO training PubMed searching

training Information seeking

training Question formulation

training

Short-term benefitsImproved searching

timeImproved question

qualityImproved

satisfaction with searching

Increased correct answers

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12;5:CD007335.

Page 10: Metropolitan Detroit Medical Library Group

Existing toolsTextbooks and handbooksPubMedGuidelinesGoogleNews servicesSubscription online databases

Page 11: Metropolitan Detroit Medical Library Group

Types of ToolsAlerting “foraging”

Prompts clinicians to ask questionsFiltered for relevance and validityTransparent evaluation and appraisal processEvidence ratingDifferentiate between “news” and practice

changing outcomesFinding “hunting”

Finding the answer to a clinical questionTransparent evidence rating criteriaTransparent reproducible methodologyEase of useEase of access

Page 12: Metropolitan Detroit Medical Library Group

Relevance:Patient Oriented Outcomes

Symptoms Functioning Quality of Life Lifespan

Page 13: Metropolitan Detroit Medical Library Group

Validity

Page 14: Metropolitan Detroit Medical Library Group

ValidityUse of appropriate criteria for appraisal

Randomized trialsSystematic reviewsDiagnostic studiesPrognostic studies

Criteria include patient oriented outcomes

Page 15: Metropolitan Detroit Medical Library Group

Highly Controlled ResearchRandomized Controlled TrialsSystematic Reviews

Physiologic ResearchPreliminary Clinical ResearchCase reportsObservational studies

Uncontrolled Observations

&Conjecture

Effect on Patient-Oriented OutcomesSymptoms (drivers license)Functioning (visual loss)Quality of Life (leg ulcers)Lifespan Effect on Disease MarkersDiabetes (Photocoagulation, GFR, NCV)Arthritis (x-ray, sed rate)Peptic Ulcer (endoscopic ulcer)Effect on Risk Factors for DiseaseImprovement in markers (blood pressure, HBA1C, cholesterol)

SORTA

Validity of Evidence

Re

leva

nce

of O

utc

om

eR

ele

vanc

e o

f Ou

tco

me

SORTB

SORTC

Adapted with permission from Slawson D. Evidence Based Medicine: Don’t We Need Information Management Instead?Evidence Based Medicine: Don’t We Need Information Management Instead?

Page 16: Metropolitan Detroit Medical Library Group

Defining Evidence-Based for a Clinical ReferenceEvidence-Based = conclusions based on best available evidence

1. Systematically identifying all applicable evidence

2. Systematically selecting the best available evidence from that identified

3. Systematically evaluating the selected evidence (critical appraisal)

4. Objectively reporting the relevant findings and quality of the evidence

5. Synthesizing multiple evidence reports

6. Deriving overall conclusions and recommendations from the evidence synthesis

7. Changing the conclusions when new evidence alters the best available evidence

Page 17: Metropolitan Detroit Medical Library Group

What clinicians needComprehensive

Valid

Systematic

Current

Synthesized

Page 18: Metropolitan Detroit Medical Library Group

AccessDesktopMobileElectronic Health

Record