mexico city and the un decade of action for road safety - martha hijar - national academy of...

22
Mexico City and the UN Decade of Action for Road Safety Transforming Transportation 2013 Presented at Transforming Transportation 2013 Martha Híjar, PhD Senior Researcher National Academy of Medicine, Mexico

Upload: wri-ross-center-for-sustainable-cities

Post on 11-Feb-2017

543 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Mexico City and the UN Decade of Action for Road Safety!

Transforming Transportation 2013!

!   Presented at Transforming Transportation 2013!

!   Martha Híjar, PhD!!   Senior Researcher!!   National Academy of Medicine, Mexico!

CITIES  AND  THE  DECADE  OF  ACTION  ON  ROAD  SAFETY  

Implica(ons  of  the  Decade  of  Ac(on  on  Road  Safety    The  case  of  Mexico  City  

Martha  Híjar  PhD  Senior  researcher  

TRANSFORMING  TRANSPORTATION  Washington    DC  /  January  17-­‐18,    2013  

Souce:    adapted  from  the  world  report  of  road  safety  WHO    2009    

FRAMEWORK  FOR  THE  DEFINITION  OF  THE    ROAD  SAFETY  PILLARS  

Systemic  approach  

Approaches  to  Road  Safety  

   TradiAonal  approach:    

•  AcAons  and  mecanisms  •  knowledge  and    •  rules  of  behaviour,    •  to  use  the  urban  roads  correctly.        

Integral  and  modern  Approach  •  Measurements  of  urban  design,    •  safe  coexistence  of  every  actor    •  social  character  of  the  street.  

Fuente:  Sanz  alduán,  Alfonso.  Calmar  el  Tráfico.  Pasos    para  una  nueva  cultura  de  la    movilidad  urbana.    3º  edición.  Madrid  2008.  Ministerio  de  Fomento,  España.    

Road  safety  management  

Safe  roads  mobility  

Safe  vehicles  

 Road  user  behaviour    

Post  crash  care  

 Regional  road  safety    instruments.  

Safety  and  protec(ve  quality  of  road  networks  for  the  all  road  users  

Develop  programmes    to    improve  road  user  behaviour  

 Improve  health  systems  to    provide  appropriate    emergency  treatment    

 

PILLAR  2  Safe  roads  mobility    

 Raise  the  inherent  safety  and  protec(ve  quality  of  road  networks  for  the  benefit  of  all  road  users,  especially  the  most  vulnerable.    

       

Courtesy  Baranda  B  

PILLAR  4:    Road  user  behavior    •  Develop  comprehensive  programs  to  improve  road  user  behavior.      •  Sustained  or  increased  enforcement  of  laws  and  standards,  combined  with    

•  Public  awareness/educa(on  to  increase    

•    SEAT-­‐BELT  and  

•    HELMET  WEARING  rates,  and                                                            INDIVIDUAL  RISK  

FACTORS  

•    to  reduce    DRINK-­‐DRIVING,                                                                            MOTOR  CRASHES                                                                              

•    SPEED,    and  other  risk  factors    

HOME   HOME  

PARTNERS   OFFICE   RESTAURANTE  

SCHOOL  

PHYSICIAN  

5    TRIPS  28  Kms.  

OFFICE  

13    TRIPS  46  Kms.  

SHOPING  SCHOOL  BUS STOP

BUS STOP

GROCERY  STORE  

Source: Alcântara de Vasconcelos Eduardo,2008

MOBILITY  PATTERNS  ACCORDING  FAMILY  INCOME  

LOW HIGH 4 PERSONS NO CAR 4 PERSONS TWO CARS

PUBLIC TRANSPORT BY FOOT CAR TAXI BIKE

WHAT  MEANS  MOBILITY  ON  URBAN  AREAS?  

CITY  LIFE   AGE      WORK      INCOME    (social    class)      RESIDENCE      DAILY  ACTIVITIES  

•  TECHNICAL  PROBLEM    a  SOCIAL    AND    POLITICAL  issue  

0  

2  

4  

6  

8  

10  

12  

Pedestrian   Cyclist   Motorcyclist   Occupants   Other   RTI  

2007  

2008  

2009  

2010  

2011*  

RTI Mortality rates by type of road user Mexico City 2007-2011

RATES/100,000  IHAB

ITAN

TS  

TYPE  OF  ROAD  USER  

YEAR  

0  

2  

4  

6  

8  

10  

12  

14  

16  

18  

Pedestrian   Cyclist   Motorcyclist   Occupants   Other   RTI  

2007  

2008  

2009  

2010  

2011*  

RATES/100,000  IHAB

ITAN

TS   YEAR  

TYPE  OF  ROAD  USER  

RTI Hospital discharge rates by type of road user Mexico City 2007-2011

Mexico City Context      ROAD  TRAFFIC  

VS  ROAD  SAFETY  

�  MODEL  (CAR  ORIENTED)  MOST  DISADVANTAGED    

   �  Needs  of  individual  mobility  PARTIALLY  SOLVED        

�  MODES  OF  PUBLIC  TRANSPORTATION  but  not  interconnected  

�  Adverse  effects:  Environmental,  human  hours  lost,  physical  and  MENTAL  HEALTH  

 �  Severe  externality  ROAD  TRAFFIC  INJURIES,    

Source:  Naci,  H.,  Chisholm,  D.,  Baker,  T.D.,  2009.  Distribu(on  of  road  traffic  deaths    by  road  user  group:  a  global  comparison.  Injury  Preven(on  15,  55–59  

DistribuAon  of  road  traffic  fataliAes  by  road  user    in  low,  middle  and  high  income  countries  

74%

51% 61%

20%

49%

36% 47%

9%

12%

11%

14%

6%

8%

12%

2%

5%

8%

5%

6%

2%

4%

12%

23%

20%

31%

32%

43% 23%

2% 8%

1%

31%

8% 10% 14%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

North America

Caribe Latino

Caribe no latino

Cono sur

Meso América

Andina TOTAL

Others and unespecified

Pedestrians

Cyclists

Motorcyclists

Motor vehicle occupants

CAUSES  OF  DEATH  BY  ROAD  TRAFFIC  INJURIES    LAS  AMERICAS  REGION  2009  

Source:  Reporte  regional  sobre  seguridad  vial  en  Las  Américas.  PAHO  2010  

Unplanned  urbanizaHon  

•  Air  pollu(on  •  Basic  services  •  Sedentary  lifestyle  •  Unhealthy  diets  •  Injuries  

•  Urban  poor  •  Older  adults  •  Immigrant  groups  •  Indigenous  popula(on  

COMMUNITY  DESIGN  AND  HEALTH  

•  Obesity,  physical  ac(vity,  CVD  •  Water  quan(ty  and  quality  

•  Air  pollu(on  and  asthma  •  Climate  change  contribu(on  •  ↑  Car  crashes  •  ↑  Pedestrian  injuries    •  Mental  health  impact  •  ↓  Social  capital  

Related  to  land  use  

 

Related  to  automobile  dependency  

 

 

Related  to  social  processes  

Exposure:  pedestrian  or  cyclist  

Outcome  Longevity  Disease  preven(on  

 CHD    Cancer    Diabetes    Stroke  

Health  promo(on  Mental  health  

Walking  and  cycling  as  physical  ac(vity    or  as  a  mobility  need?  

CONTEXT  IS  IMPORTANT  

WALK    AND  CYCLING  ARE  DANGEROUS  BUT  NOT  TO  DO  IT  IS  MORE  DANGEROUS  

INEQUITIES  

SOCIAL  CAPITAL  

DEVELOPMENT  OF  A  INTEGRATIVE  MODEL  FOR  

ROAD  SAFETY  MANAGEMENT  

GOVERANCE  AND  SUSTENTABILITY  

SOCIAL  PARTICIPATION  INTERSETORIALITY  AND  SOCIAL  NETWORKS  

PUBLIC  POLICY  

KNOWLEDGE  RESULTS  

PARTICIPATORY  PROCESS  

HEALTH  

Conceptual model for Safety Promotion

CHALLENGES    THE  INDIVIDUAL  RISK  FACTORS                                                      SAFETY  PROMOTION    MODERN,  COMPREHENSIVE  AND  INCLUSIVE  ROAD  SAFETY  APPROACH    NEW    PARADIGM  FOR  MOBILITY.  WALK  SAFETY  AND  INTERCONNECTED  WITH  THE  REST  OF  THE  TRANSPORT  SYSTEM.    INCLUDE  MORE  DETAILED  ACTIONS  BY  TYPE  OF  ROAD  ACTOR  AT  THE  DECADE  OF  ACTION  FOR  ROAD  SAFETY    TO  PROMOTE  THE  MOBILITY  OF  A  SAFE,  EQUITABLE,  HEALTHY  AND  SUSTAINABLE  WAY  FOR  ALL  AND  EACH  ROAD  ACTOR    MOBILITY  POLICIES  BASED  ON  EVIDENCE  BASE      THINK  GLOBALLY/  ACT  LOCALLY  (The  importance  of  the  context)  

Man  has  lost  the  power  to  conceive  himself  as  something  other  than  a  user  of  motorized  transport.    He  has  lost  consciousness    of  the  physical  ,  social  and  psychological  powers  available  to  him  because  of  his  feet.    He  has  forgooen  to  mark  the  scope  of  his  domains  with  his  footprints,  or  to  meet  with  the  neighbors  walking  around  a  park.    He  can’t  find  anyone  without  crashing,  nor  can  he  arrive  without  a  motor  dragging  him  

YVAN  ILLYCH            CONFERENCE  ABOUT  MEXICO  CITY  Universidad  Autónoma  de    México  1970    (42  years  ago)  

GRACIAS                  THANK  YOU  

[email protected]  

Transforming Transportation 2013!

!   Co-organized by EMBARQ and The World Bank!!   More information at:!! EMBARQ.org!! worldbank.org/transport!

!   Questions? Comments? Contact us at [email protected]!!   Follow us on Twitter: @EMBARQnetwork!

Transforming Transportation 2013!