UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING REPORT – LECTURER

DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES, UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

SUMMATIVE PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING REPORT LECTURER

For Reviewers

How to use this form:

1) After being assigned a review: Read through pages 2-3 for important background information.

2) At the pre-observation meeting: Share all pages with the reviewee and discuss how the form will be used in the peer review process.

3) During the observation(s) of teaching: Record your individual notes on pages 4-8. These pages can be shared between reviewers.

4) Prior to writing the report: Use the completed information on pages 4-8 to reflect on the reviewee’s teaching and to debrief the observation with the other reviewer. Then use the information to help craft your joint report. If you perform two observations of teaching, you will still write only 1 report but it will draw from the two observations of teaching you conducted jointly with the other reviewer.

5) When completing the joint report: Use pages 10-17 to complete the report which will be shared with the reviewee and submitted to the Department Head. Create a new file with only pages 10-17.

6) At the post-observation meeting: Share pages 10-17 with the reviewee.

7) Submitting the joint report to the Department Head: Submit pages 10-17 only to the Department Head. Please send a copy to the reviewee.

August 2, 2018 1

UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING REPORT – LECTURER

Information for Reviewers and Reviewees:

The information below is intended to help you understand how to use this form. If you have any questions, please contact Dr. Isabeau Iqbal at Isabeau.iqbal@ubc.ca or by phone at 604 827 0648.

Please also consult the Checklist for Reviewers and Checklist for Reviewees, which provides details about the overall Peer Review of Teaching process.

Guidelines for using this form:

A note about the distinction between the formative teaching consultations and the summative peer reviews of teaching.The formative review is “reviewee-driven”. Reviewees are strongly encouraged to reflect on and discuss their approach to teaching and assessment, the course context and any specific challenges/issues. The summative review is “criteria-driven”.  Reviewers and reviewees will go through all the criteria on the summative review form, in addition to discussing the reviewees’ approach to teaching, course content, specific challenges, etc.

Discussion of the blank form at or before the pre-observation meetingReviewees should be familiar with the criteria in this form as they are required to use a version of it in their second formative teaching consultation. Nevertheless, it is important that the reviewers and reviewees discuss the contents of this form prior to the observation. This will allow the reviewee to be familiar with the expectations and to highlight any areas that may not be applicable to their own teaching.

Reviewers should craft the report togetherThe report consists of pages 10-17 of this document (we recommend you create a separate document just with those pages). The reviewee should receive a single report that is jointly written by both reviewers. It is up to the reviewers to decide how best to craft the joint report. Please note that reviewers should not include written statements that indicate whether they would recommend or not recommend the instructor for reappointment.

Sharing the report at the post-observation meetingReviewers should share the report (pages 10-17) with the reviewee at the post-observation meeting. By sharing it at the meeting, and not beforehand, the reviewers and reviewee can develop a shared understanding of the comments. Some reviewers have found that sharing the report ahead of time leads to misunderstandings; as a result, the Department process is that the report be printed and shared at the post-observation meeting.

Passing the reviewA successful Summative Review entails obtaining a cumulative score of at least 20/25 across all five categories with no more than two areas receiving less than a 4 on the Peer Review of Teaching Report.A score of 1 or 2 in any one area will be considered an unsuccessful review.

Signing the reportReviewees must sign the report at the post-observation meeting. They have the choice of:1) Signing and accepting the report as is.2) Signing and indicating they will dispute the report. Disputing the report means the instructor will submit a written response to the department head within 2 weeks of the post-observation meeting.3) Signing and taking 5 business days to determine whether they want to respond. If the instructor opts to respond, s/he must submit their response within 2 weeks of the post-observation meeting.

August 2, 2018 2

UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING REPORT – LECTURER

Other• The Reviewer should rate each set of criteria using the rating scale given below. • The criteria are guidelines only and we trust that reviewers will use their best judgment to

determine whether, in their particular case, these apply or not. • For each set of criteria, the Reviewers should circle the appropriate rating, and provide written

explanation of the assessment. • Please provide a written overall review and additional comments at the end of the form or

through an attachment.

August 2, 2018 3

UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING REPORT – LECTURER

Scale to use

N/A 1 2 3 4 5

Not at all Inconsistently Adequately Very well Extremely well

(1) Course Materials Please review the pedagogical value of the instructor’s course materials, considering criteria such as the following:

Reviewers: Please note that the numerical scale in this table is meant as a tool to keep track of your impressions of the specific criteria listed below. You are not expected to tabulate results from the table to derive an overall rating below.

Course materials are aligned with course overall goals and specific lesson objectives

N/A 1 2 3 4 5

Materials are at the appropriate level of complexity

Course materials are up-to-date

Audio-visual materials support student learning

Homework assignments/exercises prepare learners for upcoming lessons

Homework assignments/exercises support learning from previous classes and course work.

Quizzes/exams/projects are aligned with course goals and session learning objectives

Grading criteria are clear and informative

Overall Rating:

N/A 1 2 3 4 5

Not at all Inconsistently Adequately Very well Extremely well

Specific comments regarding the Instructor’s course materials:

August 2, 2018 4

UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING REPORT – LECTURER

(2) Opening and Closing of Class Session Please review how the instructor began and ended the class session, considering criteria such as the following:

Reviewers: Please note that the numerical scale in this table is meant as a tool to keep track of your impressions of the specific criteria listed below. You are not expected to tabulate results from the table to derive an overall rating below.

Starts class on time N/A 1 2 3 4 5

Begins in a manner that stimulates students’ interest and attention

Checks students’ prior knowledge of the topic

Clearly states purpose/objectives of the lesson

Presents overview of lesson sequence

Relates lesson to previously covered material

Summarizes/reviews major points and learning objectives

Links the content covered to upcoming lessons

Concludes on time

Overall Rating:

N/A 1 2 3 4 5

Not at all Inconsistently Adequately Very well Extremely well

Specific comments regarding the opening and closing of class session:

August 2, 2018 5

UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING REPORT – LECTURER

(3) Language Instruction

Please review how effectively the Instructor fostered learning, considering criteria such as:

Reviewers: Please note that the numerical scale in this table is meant as a tool to keep track of your impressions of the specific criteria listed below. You are not expected to tabulate results from the table to derive an overall rating below.

Use of target language is effective N/A 1 2 3 4 5

Maximizes use of target language at level appropriate for the class

Explanations of grammatical/linguistic structures are clear and concise

Introduction and reinforcement of vocabulary are comprehensive and engaging

Incorporates relevant and stimulating cultural elements

Demonstrates sensitivity to intellectual and cultural issues

Provides strong examples of target language usage (conventions, formalities, contextual and situational factors)

Integrates four language skills (listening, speaking, reading, writing) as appropriate to the lesson

Overall Rating:

N/A 1 2 3 4 5

Not at all Inconsistently Adequately Very well Extremely well

Specific comments regarding the Instructor’s language instruction:

August 2, 2018 6

UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING REPORT – LECTURER

(4) Learner Engagement and Rapport

Please review how effectively the Instructor fostered learner engagement and rapport, considering criteria such as:

Reviewers: Please note that the numerical scale in this table is meant as a tool to keep track of your impressions of the specific criteria listed below. You are not expected to tabulate results from the table to derive an overall rating below.

N/A 1 2 3 4 5

Involves learners through a variety of activities

Is attentive to diverse learners

Encourages student questions and discussion

Periodically checks students’ comprehension

Responds appropriately to non-verbal cues of confusion, boredom and curiosity

Overall Rating:

N/A 1 2 3 4 5

Not at all Inconsistently Adequately Very well Extremely well

Specific comments regarding ways the Instructor engages students and builds rapport:

August 2, 2018 7

UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING REPORT – LECTURER

(5) Instructional Strategies

Please review how effectively the Instructor fostered learner engagement and rapport, considering criteria such as:

Reviewers: Please note that the numerical scale in this table is meant as a tool to keep track of your impressions of the specific criteria listed below. You are not expected to tabulate results from the table to derive an overall rating below.

N/A 1 2 3 4 5

Stimulates interest in the course subject

Selects teaching techniques that are appropriate for stated learning objectives

Nurtures student-centered learning

Provides clear directions for practice, group work or other forms of active learning

Checks for student understanding regularly

Provides materials (e.g. handouts, presentation slides, board work etcetera) that support student learning

Effectively holds the class’ attention

Uses appropriate pacing

Overall Rating:

N/A 1 2 3 4 5

Not at all Inconsistently Adequately Very well Extremely well

Specific comments regarding the instructional strategies used:

August 2, 2018 8

UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING REPORT – LECTURER

Overall Review:

(1) Course Materials Rating __/5

(2) Opening and Closing of Class Session Rating __/5

(3) Language Instruction Rating __/5

(4) Learner Engagement & Rapport Rating __/5 (5) Instructional Strategies Rating __/5

TOTAL: __________

Reminder:

A successful Summative Review entails obtaining a cumulative score of at least 20/25 across all five categories with no more than two areas receiving less than a 4 on the Peer Review of Teaching Report. A score of 1 or 2 in any one area will be considered an unsuccessful review.

Additional Comments: Please provide an overall written review of the Instructor’s teaching and include any additional comments in the space below, or through an attached document.

August 2, 2018 9

UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING REPORT – LECTURER

DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES, UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

SUMMATIVE PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING REPORT 12-MONTH LECTURER

FINAL REPORT

Instructor Name:

Rank:

Course Number:

Course Name:

Reviewer(s) Name & Rank: Date of Review:

Duration of Class: Class Location:

Nature of Teaching Observed: (e.g.,lecture, discussion, performance / screening, seminar, tutorial, etc.)

Course Enrollment:

Number of Students in Attendance:

August 2, 2018 10

UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING REPORT – LECTURER

Reviewers:

We have met with the Instructor to discuss this peer review prior to submission.

Reviewer name:

Signature: _________________________________ Date: ___________________

Reviewer name:

Signature: _________________________________ Date: ___________________

Instructor:

Please check one:

Option One: I do not intend to dispute this review.☐

Option Two: I intend to dispute this review. (see Note 1)☐

Option Three: I will take up to 5 business days to decide whether I will dispute this ☐report. (see Note 1)

Note 1: If disputing, I understand that I need to submit a written response to the department head within two weeks of today.

Instructor name:

Signature: _________________________________ Date: ___________________

August 2, 2018 11

UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING REPORT – LECTURER

(1) Course Materials

Criteria: Course materials are aligned with course overall goals and specific lesson objectives Materials are at the appropriate level of complexity Course materials are up-to-date Audio-visual materials support student learning Homework assignments/exercises prepare learners for upcoming lessons Homework assignments/exercises support learning from previous classes and

course work. Quizzes/exams/projects are aligned with course goals and session learning

objectives Grading criteria are clear and informative

Comments:

Overall Rating:

N/A 1 2 3 4 5

Not at all Inconsistently Adequately Very well Extremely well

August 2, 2018 12

UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING REPORT – LECTURER

(2) Opening and Closing of Class Session

Criteria: Starts class on time Begins in a manner that stimulates students’ interest and attention Checks students’ prior knowledge of the topic Clearly states purpose/objectives of the lesson Presents overview of lesson sequence Relates lesson to previously covered material Summarizes/reviews major points and learning objectives Links the content covered to upcoming lessons Concludes on time

Comments:

Overall Rating:

N/A 1 2 3 4 5

Not at all Inconsistently Adequately Very well Extremely well

August 2, 2018 13

UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING REPORT – LECTURER

(3) Language Instruction

Criteria: Use of target language is effective Maximizes use of target language at level appropriate for the class Explanations of grammatical/linguistic structures are clear and concise Introduction and reinforcement of vocabulary are comprehensive and engaging Incorporates relevant and stimulating cultural elements Demonstrates sensitivity to intellectual and cultural issues Provides strong examples of target language usage (conventions, formalities,

contextual and situational factors) Integrates four language skills (listening, speaking, reading, writing) as appropriate to

the lesson

Comments:

Overall Rating:

N/A 1 2 3 4 5

Not at all Inconsistently Adequately Very well Extremely well

August 2, 2018 14

UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING REPORT – LECTURER

(4) Learner Engagement and Rapport

Criteria: Involves learners through a variety of activities Is attentive to diverse learners Encourages student questions and discussion Periodically checks students’ comprehension Responds appropriately to non-verbal cues of confusion, boredom and curiosity

Comments:

Overall Rating:

N/A 1 2 3 4 5

Not at all Inconsistently Adequately Very well Extremely well

August 2, 2018 15

UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING REPORT – LECTURER

(5) Instructional Strategies

Criteria: Stimulates interest in the course subject Selects teaching techniques that are appropriate for stated learning objectives Nurtures student-centered learning Provides clear directions for practice, group work or other forms of active learning Checks for student understanding regularly Provides materials (e.g. handouts, presentation slides, board work etcetera) that

support student learning Effectively holds the class’ attention Uses appropriate pacing

Comments:

Overall Rating:

N/A 1 2 3 4 5

Not at all Inconsistently Adequately Very well Extremely well

August 2, 2018 16

UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA – DEPARTMENT OF ASIAN STUDIES PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING REPORT – LECTURER

Overall Review:

(1) Course Materials Rating __/5

(2) Opening and Closing of Class Session Rating __/5

(3) Language Instruction Rating __/5

(4) Learner Engagement & Rapport Rating __/5 (5) Instructional Strategies Rating __/5

TOTAL: _________

Reminder:

A successful Summative Review entails obtaining a cumulative score of at least 20/25 across all five categories with no more than two areas receiving less than a 4 on the Peer Review of Teaching Report. A score of 1 or 2 in any one area will be considered an unsuccessful review.

Additional Comments: Please provide an overall written review of the Instructor’s teaching and include any additional comments in the space below, or through an attached document.

August 2, 2018 17