migralepsy2
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/27/2019 MIGRALEPSY2
1/5
Review
Migralepsy and related conditions: Advances in pathophysiology andclassification
Alberto Verrotti a, Pasquale Striano b, Vincenzo Belcastro c, Sara Matricardi a, Maria Pia Villa d,Pasquale Parisi d,*a Child Neurology and Department of Pediatrics, University of Chieti, Italyb Muscular and Neurodegenerative Diseases Unit, G. Gaslini Institute, University of Genova, Italyc Neurology Clinic, Department of Neuroscience, SantAnna Hospital, Como, Italyd Child Neurology, Pediatric Headache Centre, Sleep Disorders Centre, Chair of Pediatrics, Second, Faculty of Medicine, Sapienza University, Via di Grottarossa,
1035-1039, 00189 Rome, Italy
1. Introduction
The clinically based hypothesis that migraine and epilepsy are
related dates back to the 19th century.1 Both disorders are
characterized by transient paroxysmal episodes of altered brain
function with a clinical, pathophysiological and therapeutic
overlap.2
The prevalence of migraine is low in childhood, peaks in adult
age and decreases in old age, whereas the incidence of epilepsy is
highest in childhood and old age.3 Nevertheless, there is a strong
epidemiological association between these two conditions, and the
occurrence of both disorders in the same individual is more
frequentthan is to be expected on the basis of a chance occurrence.
Indeed, the prevalence of epilepsy in the population of migraine
sufferers ranges, depending on the study, from 1% to 17%, with a
median of 5.9%,4 which is significantly higher thanthe prevalence
of epilepsy in the general population (0.51%).3 Moreover, the
frequency of migraine in the epilepsy population is high, rangingfrom 8.4% to 20%.1
Over the last decade, the possible common pathophysiological
mechanisms underlying these two conditions have received a
considerable amount of attention. Many of the studies that have
been conducted support the hypothesis of excessive neocortical
cellular excitability as the main pathological mechanism underly-
ing the onset of both diseases.2 In migraine, however, hyperexcit-
ability is believed to transition to cortical spreading depression
rather than to the hypersynchronous activity that characterizes
epilepsy. Notably, some forms of epilepsy and migraine are known
to be channelopathies.2 Mutations in the same genes can cause
Seizure 20 (2011) 271275
A R T I C L E I N F O
Article history:
Received 5 January 2011
Received in revised form 8 February 2011
Accepted 21 February 2011
Keywords:
Migralepsy
Hemicrania epileptica
Ictal epileptic headache
Epilepsy
Cortical spreading depression
Migraine
A B S T R A C T
Basic and clinical neuroscience research findings suggest that cortical spreading depression (CSD) and
epileptic foci mayfacilitateeach other; furthermore, thethreshold required forthe onset of CSDhas been
suggested to be lowerthan that requiredfor an epileptic focus. Thesedata may explain theprevalence of
epilepsy in migraine populations (ranging from 1% to 17%) and the frequency of migraine in epileptic
populations (ranging from 8.4% to 20%). There is currently a considerable amount of confusion regarding
this topic in both headache and epilepsy classifications (ICHD-II and ILAE). The ICHD-II includes
migraine-triggered seizure (coded as 1.5.5) (so-called migralepsy) among the complications of
migraine, and defines hemicrania epileptica (7.6.1) as an ictal headache (ipsilateral to the ictal
EEG discharge) that occurs synchronously with a seizure (partial epileptic seizure) recognized by ILAE
classification. However, neither migralepsy nor hemicrania epileptica are terms used in the current
ILAE classification.On the basis of data reported in the literature and our recent findings, we suggestthat
the terms migraine-triggered seizure and migralepsy be deleted until unequivocal evidence of the
existence of these conditions emerges. Ictal epileptic headache (IEH) should be used to classify thoserare events in which headache represents the sole ictal epileptic manifestation. On the other hand, the
term hemicrania epileptica should be maintained in the ICHD-II and introduced into the ILAE, and be
used to classify all cases in which an ictal epileptic headache coexists and is associated
synchronously or sequentially with other ictal sensory-motor events.
2011 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
* Corresponding author at: Child Neurology, Headache Paediatric Center,
Paediatric Sleep Disorders, Chair of Paediatrics, II Faculty of Medicine, Sapienza
University, c/o SantAndrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039 Rome, Italy.
Tel.: +39 6 33775971.
E-mail addresses: [email protected],[email protected] (P. Parisi).
Contents lists available atScienceDirect
Seizure
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / y s e i z
1059-1311/$ see front matter 2011 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2011.02.012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2011.02.012mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10591311http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2011.02.012http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2011.02.012http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10591311mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2011.02.012 -
7/27/2019 MIGRALEPSY2
2/5
either migraine or epilepsy or, in some cases, both. Furthermore,
given the likely commonalities in the underlying cellular and
molecular mechanisms, it is hardly surprising that some antiepi-
leptic drugs (AEDs), including valproate, topiramate and gaba-
pentin, are also effective as antimigraine agents.5 Ionotropic
glutamate receptors are involved in both migraine and epilepsy,
with NMDA receptors, which are critical to cortical spreading
depression, playing a particularly important role in migraine.5
Migralepsy is a rare condition in which a migraine attack is
followed, within an hour, by an epileptic seizure.4,6,7 However, the
diagnosis of this condition is extremely challenging, as is the task
of differentiating it from epileptic seizures.811 In recent years, the
inaccuracy of the current definition and classification of migra-
lepsy and conditions related to migralepsy has become increas-
ingly apparent.1014
2. Definitions
The term migralepsy was first used in 1960 by Lennox &
Lennox (who quoted Dr Douglas Davison) to describe a condition
wherein ophthalmic migraine with perhaps nausea and vomiting
was followed by symptoms characteristicof epilepsy.7 Since then,
approximately 50 cases have been described in the literature, the
majority of which have been the criticized by other authors.1014 Itis surprising that so few case reports have been published despite
the fact that migraine and epilepsy are among the most common
brain diseases.12 Indeed, most of the cases of migralepsy that
have been reported are either complex cases that do not provide
unequivocal evidence of an association between migraine and
epilepsy or occipital seizures imitating migraine with aura.8,9
Migralepsy does not exist in previous classifications of the
International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) or in therecent report
of the ILAE Commission on the Classification and Terminology of
seizures and epilepsies15; however, according to the current
International Classification of Headache Disorders II (ICHD-II),16
migralepsy is included among the complications of migraine
(paragraph coded 1.5.5.) and is defined as a migraine triggered-
seizure that must fulfill two diagnostic criteria: (a) migrainefulfilling the criteria for 1.2 Migraine with aura (MwA); (b) a
seizure fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for one type of epileptic
attack that occurs within 1 h of a migraine aura.16
Migralepsy is different from hemicrania epileptica, which is
defined in the ICHD-2 classification (International Headache
Society, 2004) (coded as 7.6.1) as an ictal headache (ipsilateral
to the ictal EEG discharge) that occurs synchronously with a
seizure (partial epileptic seizure) included in the ILAE classifica-
tion. The term ictal epileptic headache has recently been
proposed by Parisi et al. 1721 and defined as the sole ictal
epileptic phenomenon without any other associated ictal epilep-
tic signs/symptoms recognized by the ILAE.
Sances et al. 12 recently provided a demonstration of the
inadequacy of the current definition of migralepsy: MwA includes avariety of MwA subtypes (typical aura with migraine headache,
typical aura with non-migraine headache, typical aura without
headache, familial hemiplegic migraine, sporadic hemiplegic
migraine, and basilar-type migraine), though none of these has
been associated with migralepsy. In addition, migralepsy may even
be triggered by migraine withoutaura (MwoA) attacks or may occur
later than the 1-h post-aural time-frame stipulated by the ICHD-II
criteria.13 Sances et al. thus suggested that the definition of
migralepsy should only include those types of migraine that are
reported to be associated with the migralepsy clinical picture;
moreover, they recommended that theICHD-II definitionbe revised,
relocating migralepsy from the complications of migraine
paragraph to the ICHD-II Appendix (where novel entities that have
not been sufficiently validated by research studies are classified).
3. Clinical, EEG and neuroimaging aspects in migralepsy and
related conditions
There are at least fifty potential cases of migralepsy in the
literature.4,6,7,12,13 However, the diagnosis in the majority of these
cases (38%) was uncertain owing to the lack of unequivocal
information. Moreover, thediagnosis in many of thecases does not
fulfill the current ICHD-II criteria (30%) or is at least questionable
(28%).12 In the questionable cases,the description of the attack and
the EEG and brain imaging findings are all highly suggestive of
epileptic seizures (particularly occipital seizures). Therefore, only
4% of the cases display features supporting a diagnosis of a
migraine-triggered seizure and fulfill the ICHD-II criteria.12,16 In
the majority of the remaining cases, an EEG during the migraine
attack is either not available (68%) or is normal in the few cases in
which it is (4%); the main EEG abnormalities (28%) are periodic
lateralized epileptiform discharges (PLEDs) or localized theta
delta activity.
The interictal EEG in the published migralepsy cases is normal
in some cases (32%) but displays generalized (28%) or localized
(34%) abnormalities in the majority of them. These abnormalities
are characterized by spikes, spikewave complexes and sharp
waves, mainly localized in the temporal and/or occipital lobes.
As regards theictalEEG abnormalities in these types of patients,it should be borne in mind that while unequivocal epileptiform
abnormalities usually point to a diagnosis of epilepsy, the lack of a
clear epileptic spike-wave activity is frequent in other ictal
autonomic manifestations, such as Panayiotopoulos syn-
drome,1821 as well as in patients with a deep epileptic focus
arising, for example, from the orbito-mesial frontal zone.1821 In
such cases, ictal epileptic EEG activity might be recorded either
from the scalp or by stereo-EEG recording as a theta, or even
delta, shape without any spike activity. Interestingly, in one
patient with headache as the sole ictal epileptic manifestation, it
was not possible to record any EEG abnormalities from the scalp.22
It has been suggested that the neurobiological explanation for
these EEG features is closely related to anatomo-neurophysiologi-
cal variables (fiber size, myelination and extent of polysynapticinterconnections).18,2123
In the cases of migralepsy in the literature, the seizures
triggered by migraine attacks are prevalently generalized tonic
clonic seizures (GTC: 50%), though in some cases they are simple
partial seizures (SP: 8%) or complex partial seizures (CP: 16%) with
loss of consciousness.6,7,12,13 The elementary visual hallucinations
that precede pain onset in idiopathic or symptomatic occipital
seizures may represent the only symptom in such patients, thus
mimicking a typical aura migraine; these epileptic seizures with
post-ictal headache may thus be mistaken as migraine with aura,
basilar migraine, acephalalgic migraine or migralepsy. Moreover,
they are quite distinct from visual aura of migraine in their
individual elements of colour, shape, size, location, movement,
speed of development, duration and progress.8,9
Therefore,physicians need to be fully aware of the various diagnostic criteria
if they are to choose the most appropriate treatment.
Interestingly, the patients in many so-called ictal epileptic
headache case reports are photosensitive; they usually also
present a clinical history (personal and/or familial) of epilepsy and
migraine and a photoparoxysmal EEG response.17,2427 In two
cases, intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) evoked headache,
though it may also be possible to visually induce seizures in such
patients.17,24 The fact that headache itself is unlikely to be the sole
epileptic symptom, whether it is related to photosensitivity or not,
led to the proposal of the term ictal epileptic headache.1721
And what would the clinical and EEG features of the ictal-EEG
recording in the ictal epileptic headache cases be? Unfortunate-
ly, there is no specific EEG picture in these cases either, with
A. Verrotti et al. / Seizure 20 (2011) 271275272
-
7/27/2019 MIGRALEPSY2
3/5
numerous different EEG associated patterns having been recorded
during migraine-like complaints.10,11,1722,2427 These patterns
include: (i) high-voltage, rhythmic, 1112 Hz activity with
intermingled spikes over the right temporo-occipital regions26
27; (ii) high voltage theta activity intermingled with sharp waves
over the occipital region17 and (iii) bilateral continuous spike-and-
slow-wave discharges.25 Furthermore, a photoparoxysmal re-
sponse24 combined with complaints of a light pulsating headache
have been reported during intermittent photic stimulation.17 In
this respect, we would also like to stress the possible existence of
an isolated epileptic headache, with no associated ictal epileptic
manifestations or EEG abnormalities that can be recognized by
scalp EEG recording, whose ictal origin can be demonstrated by
depth electrode studies (see patient number 2 by Laplante et al.).22
In this regard, it should be borne in mind that in other types of
epilepsy, such as frontal lobe epilepsy, epileptic activity cannot be
detected from the scalp-EEG recording in as many as 40% of the
patients.23
It is noteworthy that complete remissionof the headacheand of
the epileptic abnormalities in most of these ictal epileptic
headache patients was achieved not by means of specific
antimigraine drugs, but following intravenous administration of
diazepam17,25,26 or phenytoin.27
According to the definition provided in the ICHD-II, migralepsyis considered to be associated with MwA attacks alone. Some
authors, however, believe that a MwoA attack acts as a trigger for
an epileptic seizure.12,13 Although such events are very rare, it is
possible that the development of a MwoA attack may favor the
recurrence of a seizure according to the pathophysiological
mechanism previously described for the MwA18; furthermore,
epileptic seizures have been reported to develop later than 1 h
after the MA attack.13
Transient brain MRI abnormalities, persisting for days, have
been reported in about 6% of patients with migralepsy.28 Blood
brain barrier damage and consequent edema have been suggested
to explain reversible radiological alterations in such cases.
In cases of migraine-triggered seizures (migralepsy), most EEG
recordings show a diffuse, irregular, high voltage, thetadeltaactivity during the episodes. The EEG abnormalities were, like the
MRI alterations, transient and disappeared at the long-term
follow-up.28 Although it is not easy to interpret these findings,
one explanation maybe that they arethe functional correlate of the
reversible MRI alterations observed in patients with migralepsy.
As regards the MRI features in the published cases of ictal
epileptic headache, brain MRI revealed secondary brain lesions in
the right temporo-parieto-occipital region along with limited
diffusion in the right occipital region26,27 or enlarged sulci in the
right parietal region.24 However, ictal epileptic headache has
also been reported in patients with idiopathic epilepsy.17,25
As regards the therapy, the effectiveness of AEDs in the
prophylaxis phase may be explained by the anticipation of the
cortical spreading depression (CSD) event that induces secondarytrigemino-vascular system (TVS) activation and lowers the seizure
threshold in the pathophysiology of migralepsy. Sodium valproate,
topiramate and gabapentin have all proved to be effective in
double-blind placebo controlled trials, the first two drugs having
also been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as
migraine preventive agents.5,29,30 Open trials suggest that zoni-
samide and levetiracetam may help prevent the onset of
migraine.31,32
4. Pathophysiological and genetic aspects
Although the pathophysiology of migraine-induced seizures is
stillundefined, it has beenhypothesizedthat the cortical excitation
threshold in migraineurs is lower than in normal subjects, thereby
favoring the occurrence of seizure; the lower cortical excitation
threshold might be due to several conditions, alone or in
combination, such as mitochondrial defects, disturbance in
magnesium metabolism or ion channels abnormalities.33
Cortical spreading depression (CSD) seems to be the connecting
point between migraine and epilepsy.10,34,35 CSD is characterized
by a slowly propagating wave (26 mm/min) of sustained strong
neuronal depolarization that generates transient intense spike
activity as it progresses into the brain tissue (resulting in a
transient loss of membrane ionic gradients and in a massive surge
of extracellular potassium, neurotransmitters and intracellular
calcium), followed by neural suppression which may last for
minutes. The depolarizationphase is associated with an increase in
regional cerebral blood flow, whereas the phase of reduced neural
activity is associated with a reduction in blood flow.36 Opinions are
still divided as to whether CSD plays a physiological or a
neuroprotective role36; it is, however, believed to cause the
activation of TVS, consisting of the cascade release of numerous
inflammatory molecules (sterile inflammation) and neurotrans-
mitters, which results in pain during the migraine attack.37 The
trigemino-vascular theory has become the most widely accepted
theory in the physiopathology of migraine,37 and the CSD is
considered to be the primary cause of TVS activation at the cortical
level.The correlation between CSD and MwA was the first to
emerge38; more recently, imaging studies in patients suffering
from MwoA have also highlighted the presence and role of CSD in
silent areas as an underlying mechanism.39 It should be borne in
mind that CSD is not a phenomenon that is strictly confined to
the cortical structures. Indeed, cortical and subcortical areas
appearto be hierarchically divided according to how likelythey are
to develop CSD,40 though the occipital lobe appears to be the area
that is most likely to be affected.41 Therefore, this hierarchical
organization in the central nervous system based on neuronal
networks (cortical and subcortical) may be prone to a greater or
lesser degree to CSD (migraine) and epileptic focal discharges
(seizures).10
On the basis of these neurophysiological data, it must bestressed that critical alterations in headache physiopathology may
occur anywhere (cortical and/or subcortical) along the convergent
pathways (retinal afferents, dural nociceptors, brainstem nuclei,
cortical neurons or even astrocytes and blood vessels), which
confirms that headache is not just a brainstem disease, but a
cortico-subcortical disease that may start at any level (cortical and
subcortical)10,42; consequently, increasedawareness of this feature
of headache should serve to motivate attempts aimed at
modulating (i.e. prophylaxis) rather than merely treating this
complex disorder on an ad hoc basis.42
Going back to the relationship (at the cortical level) between
CSD and an epileptic focus, onset and propagation are triggered
when these neurophysiological events reach a certain threshold,
which is lower for CSD than for the seizure. Once the cortical eventhas started, how it spreads depends on the size of the onset zone,
its velocity, semiology and type of propagation. Moreover, the
onset of CSD and that of the epileptic seizure may facilitate each
other.10,18,35,41 These two phenomena may be triggered by more
than one pathway converging upon the same destination:
depolarization and hypersynchronization.10,18,35,41
The triggering causes, which may be environmental or
individual (genetically determined or not), result in a flow of ions
that mediates CSD, through neuronal and glial cytoplasmic bridges
(intracellular gap-junctions) rather than through interstitial
spaces, as usually occurs in the spreading of epileptic sei-
zures.10,18,21The threshold required forthe onsetof CSD(migraine)
is likely to be lower than that required for the epileptic seizure. In
this regard, a migraleptic event is very rare because the threshold
A. Verrotti et al. / Seizure 20 (2011) 271275 273
-
7/27/2019 MIGRALEPSY2
4/5
required for seizure onset and propagation is higher than that one
requested for CSD onset. Furthermore, recurrent seizures might
also predispose patients to CSD, thereby increasing the occurrence
of a peri-ictal migraine-type headache; moreover, accordingly, in
the clinical contest a post-ictal headache in epileptic patients is
much more common than all the other types (pre-ictal and ictal) of
peri-ictal headache.10,18,21
It is well known that CSD leads to significant changes in the
composition of extracellular fluid, including increases in glutamate
and potassium ions; these changes, in turn, result in hyperexcit-
ability and may lower the seizure threshold.43,44 A paroxysmal
change in cortical neuronal activity may occur during a migraine
attacks or epilepsy seizure; hyperexcitation occurs in epilepsy,
whereas in migraine hypoexcitation and hyperexcitation occur
sequentially as rebound phenomena (spreading depression).35
Much remains to be understood of the pathophysiology of these
diseases, though it is clear that glutamate metabolism,45 serotonin
metabolism,46 dopamine metabolism47 and ion channel function
are impaired in both.48 Mutations in genes coding for ionchannels,
such as those for sodium, potassium and chloride, cause abnormal
synchronization or increase the excitability of cortical neurons.49
No specific data are available on genetic aspects of migralepsy.
The best studies on genetic abnormalities that lead to epilepsy and
migraine regard Familial Hemiplegic Migraine (FHM),50 a rareautosomal dominant subtype of migraine with aura characterized
by unilateral motor weakness that occurs during the migraine
aura.16 The FHM1 gene CACNA1A codes for the pore-forming
subunit of Cav2.1 P/Q-type calcium channels and is located on the
short arm of chromosome 19; at present, 17 different mutations in
this gene are known.51 CACNA1A mutations might very well
influence cortical spreading depression, since P/Q-type calcium
channels mediate glutamate release in cortical neurons.49 The
FHM2 geneATP1A2is located on the long arm of chromosome 1.52
It codes for the a2subunit of sodium/potassium ATPase, which is
responsible for pumping potassium ions into the cell and sodium
ions out of the cell.53 Impaired sodium/potassium balance is
known to cause cortical spreading depression. As in FHM1, various
mutations in the ATP1A2 gene have been reported.51 Mutationshave recently been found in FHM families (FHM3), in the SCN1A
gene located on 2q24, which is associated with epilepsy.54 SCN1A
mutations can cause genetic epilepsy with febrile convulsions
(GEFS+), Dravet syndrome and other rare epilepsy syndromes.55
More than 150 different mutations in SCN1A have been described
in families with epilepsy.56
Several other genetic findings pointing to a link between
migraine and epilepsy have been reported. They include mutations
on SLC1A3, a member of the solute carrier family that encodes
excitatory amino acid transporter 1,57 POLG58,C10andF259, which
encode mitochondrial DNA polymerase and helicase twinkle. A
genetic defect in ion channels therefore seems to be a shared
pathophysiological mechanism of migraine and epilepsy. Voltage-
gated ion channels are part of an extensive signaling pathway thataffect neuronal excitability through various mechanisms60; in
addition, these channels can directly activate enzymes linked to
the signaling pathway and serve as cell adhesion molecules or
components of the cytoskeleton, while their activity is known to
alter the expression of other specific genes. Although it is likely
that voltage-gated ion channels are critically positioned in the
pathways associated with migraine and epilepsy, the contribution
of numerous other genes/proteins in the pathways of migralepsy
warrants further investigation.
5. Conclusions
The classification of migralepsy and related conditions
(hemicrania epileptica and ictal epileptic headache) represents a
hot topic that warrants revision to more accurately represent the
relationship between migraine/headache and epilepsy. Indeed,
migralepsy is a rare, ill-defined nosologic entity. In the majority of
cases describedin the literature, the clinical features are suggestive
of occipital lobe seizures, though the data available are not
sufficient to draw firm conclusions. Related conditions, such as
hemicrania epileptica (coded in ICHD II at point 7.6.1) and ictal
epileptic headache (recently proposed though not recognized or
classified yet) also need to be definedmore clearly. To date, neither
the International Headache Society nor the International League
against Epilepsy mention that headache/migraine may, on
occasion, be the sole ictal epileptic manifestation; this also applies
to the ICHD-II criteria as regards the classification of hemicrania
epileptica. Nonetheless, a growing body of evidence indicates that
headache per se may represent an epileptic seizure, and that it
may, in rare cases, even be the sole ictal manifestations of epilepsy.
This may result from an interplay between the epileptic focus and
CSD, which may in turn activate a common final pathway of pain
triggered by the TVS. These findings also highlight the diagnostic
importance of EEG recording during the attacks for classification
purposes. Our personal opinion, which is based on the knowledge
currently available and the clinical experiences reported here, is
that the existence of migralepsy (coded in ICHD-II as 1.5.5
migraine-triggered seizure) is, despite being theoreticallypossible, highly unlikely. We therefore propose relocating the
term migralepsy (migraine-triggered seizure) in the appendix
of both classifications (ICHD-II and ILAE) until clear evidence
emerges of its existence. Moreover, we also believe that ictal
epileptic headache should be used to classify those rare events in
which headache represents the sole ictal epileptic manifestation.
By contrast, the term hemicrania epileptica should be main-
tained in the ICHD-II and introduced into the ILAE, and be used to
classify all cases in which an ictal epileptic headache coexists
and is associated either synchronously or sequentially with other
ictal sensory-motor events.
Disclosure
None of the authors have any disclosures to declare.
Study funding
None.
Contributions
Study concept and design: PP, Drafting/revising of manuscript:
all the authors and Analysis of interpretation: all the authors
References
1. Lipton RB, Ottman R, Ehrenberg BL, Hauser WA. Comorbidity of migraine: theconnection between migraine and epilepsy.Neurology 1994;44:2832.
2. Rogawski M. Common pathophysiologic mechanismsin migraine and epilepsy.Arch Neurol 2008;65:70914.
3. Hauser AW, AnnegersJF, Anderson EV, Kurlan LT. The incidence of epilepsy andunprovoked seizure in Rochester, Minnesota, 19351984.Epilepsia 1993;34:45368.
4. Anderman F. Clinical features of migraine-epilepsy syndrome. In: Anderman F,Lugaresi E, editors. Migraine, Epilepsy. Boston, MA: Butterworth; 1987. p. 2089.
5. Calabresi P, Galletti F, Rossi C, Sarchielli P, Cupini LM. Antiepileptic drugs inmigraine: from clinical aspects to cellular mechanisms. TIPS2007;28:18895.
6. MarksDA, Ehrenberg BL.Migraine-relatedseizuresin adultswith epilepsy, withEEG correlation. Neurology 1993;43:247683.
7. LennoxWG, LennoxMA. Epilepsyand related disorders. Little. Boston: Brown&Company; 1960.
8. Panayiotopoulos CP. Differentiating occipital epilepsies from migraine withaura, acephalic migraine and basilar migraine. In: Panayiotopoulos CP, editor.Benign childhood partial seizures and related epileptic syndromes . London: John
Libbey & Company Ltd.; 1999. p. 281302.
A. Verrotti et al. / Seizure 20 (2011) 271275274
-
7/27/2019 MIGRALEPSY2
5/5
9. Panayiotopoulos CP. Elementary visual hallucination, blindness, and headachein idiopathic occipital epilepsy: differentiation from migraine. J Neurol Neuro-surg Psychiatry 1999;66:53640.
10. Parisi P. Why is migraine rarely, and not usually, the sole ictal epilepticmanifestation?Seizure2009;18:30912.
11. Parisi P, Kasteleijn-Nolst TreniteDGA. Migralepsy: a call for revision of thedefinition.Epilepsia2010;51:9323.
12. Sances G, Guaschino E, Perucca P, Allena M, Ghiotto N, Manni R. Migralepsy: acall for revision of the definition. Epilepsia 2009;50:248796.
13. Maggioni F, Mampreso E, Ruffatti S, Viaro F, Lunardelli V, Zanchin G. Migra-lepsy: is the current definion too narrow? Headache 2008;48:112932.
14. Striano P, Belcastro V, Parisi P. Status epilepticus migrainosus: clinical, electro-physiologic, and imaging characteristics. Neurology2011;76:761.15. Berg AT, Berkovic SF, Brodie MJ, et al. Revised terminology and concepts for
organization of seizures and epilepsies: report of the ILAE Commision onClassification and Terminology, 20052009.Epilepsia2010;51:67685.
16. International Headache Society. The international classification of headachedisorders. Cephalalgia, 2nd ed., 24. 2004. 9160.
17. Parisi P, Kasteleijn-NolstTreniteDG, PiccioliM, et al. A case of atipica childhoodoccipital epilepsy Gastaut type: an ictal migraine manifestation with a goodresponse to intravenous diazepam. Epilepsia2007;48:21816.
18. Parisi P, Piccioli M, Villa MP, Buttinelli C, Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenete DGA. Hy-pothesis on neurophysiopathological mechanisms linking epilepsy and head-ache. Med Hypotheses 2008;70:11504.
19. Parisi P. Whos still afraid of the link between headache and epilepsy? Somereactions to and reflections on the article by Marte Helene Bjrk and co-workers. J Headache Pain 2009;10:3279.
20. Piccioli M, Parisi P, Tisei P, Villa MP, Buttinelli C, Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenite DGA.Ictal headache and visual sensitivity. Cephalalgia2009;29:194203.
21. Kasteleijn-Nolst TreniteDGA, Verrotti A, Di Fonzo A, et al. Headache, epilepsy
and photosensitivity: how are they connected? J Headache Pain2010;11:46976.
22. Laplante P, Saint-Hilaire JM, Bouvier J. Headache as an epileptic manifestation.Neurology 1983;33:14935.
23. Derry CP, Harvey AS, Walker MC, Duncan JS, Berkovic SF. NREM arousalparasomnias and theirdistinction from nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy: a videoEEG analysis. Sleep2009;32:163744.
24. Walker MC, Smith SJM, Sisodya SM, Shorvon SD. Case of simple partial statusepilepticus in occipital lobe epilepsy misdiagnosed as migraine: clinical,electrophysiological, and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics. Epilepsia1995;36:12336.
25. Ghofrani M, Mahvelati F, Tonekaboni H. Headache as a sole manifestation innonconvulsive status epilepticus. J Child Neurol 2006;21:9813.
26. Belcastro V, Striano P, Pierguidi L, Calabresi P, Tambasco N. Ictal epilepticheadache mimicking status migrainosus: EEG and DWIMRI Findings. Head-ache2011;51:1602.
27. Perucca P, Terzaghi M, Manni R. Status epilepticus migrainosus: clinical,electrophysiologic, and imaging characteristics. Neurology2010;75:3734.
28. Mateo I, Foncea N, Vicente I, Gomez Beldarrain M, Garcia-Monco JC. Migraine-
associated seizures with recurrent and reversible magnetic resonance imagingabnormalities.Headache 2004;44:26570.
29. DAmico D. Pharmacological prophylaxis of chronic migraine: a review ofdouble-blind placebo-controlled trials.Neurol Sci 2010;31:238.
30. Chronicle E, Mulleners W. Anticonvulsant drug for migraine prophylaxis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;3:CD003226.
31. Pascual-Gomez J, Gracia-Naya M, Leira R, Mateos V, Alvaro-Gonzalez LC,Hernando I. Zonisamide in the preventive treatment of refractory migraine.Rev Neurol 2010;50:12932.
32. Rapoport AM, Bigal ME. Migraine preventive therapy: current and emergingtreatment opinions. Neurol Sci 2005;26:11120.
33. Welch KMA. Current opinions in headache pathogenesis: introduction andsynthesis.Curr Opin Neurol 1998;11:1937.
34. Somjen GG. Mechanisms of spreading depression and hypoxic spreadingdepression-like depolarization. Physiol Rev 2001;81:106596.
35. Berger M, Speckmann EJ, Pape HC, Gorji A. Spreading depression enhanceshuman neocortical excitability in vitro. Cephalalgia2008;28:55862.
36. Kunkler PE, Hulse RE, Kraig RP. Multiplex cytokine protein expression profilesfrom spreading depression in hippocampal organotypic cultures. J Cereb BloodFlow Metab 2004;24:82939.
37. Bolay H, Reuter U, Dunn AK, Huang Z, Boas DA, Moskowitz MA. Intrinsic brainactivity triggers trigeminal meningeal afferents in migraine model.Nat Med2002;8:13642.
38. Ayata C, Jin H, Kudo C, Dalkara T, Moskowitz MA. Suppression of corticalspreading depression in migraine prophylaxis. Ann Neurol 2006;59:65261.
39. Purdy RA. Migraine with and without aura share the same pathogenetic
mechanisms.Neurol Sci 2008;29
:446.40. Richter F, Bauer R, Lehmenkuhler A, Schaible HG. Spreading depression in thebrainstem of the rat: electrophysiological parameters and influences on re-gional brainstem blood flow. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab2008;28:98494.
41. Gigout S, Louvel J, Kawasaki H, DAntuono M, Armand V, Kurcewicz I. Effects ofgap junction blockers on human neocortical synchronization. Neurobiol Dis2006;22:496508.
42. Charles A, Brennan KC. The neurobiology of migraine. Handb Clin Neurol2010;97:99108.
43. Cai S, Hamiwka LD, Wirrell EC. Peri-ictal headache in children: prevalence andcharacter.Pediatr Neurol 2008;39:916.
44. Wirrell EC, Hamiwka LD. Do children with benign rolandic epilepsy have ahigher prevalence of migraine than those with other partial epilepsies or nonepilepsy controls? Epilepsia2006;47:167481.
45. Hamberger A, van Gelder NM. Metabolic manipulation of neural tissue tocounter the hypersynchronous excitation of migraine and epilepsy. NeurochemRes 1993;18:5039.
46. Johnson MP, Griffiths LR. A genetic analysis of serotonergic biosynthetic andmetabolic enzymes in migraine using a DNA pooling approach. J Hum Genet
2005;50:60710.47. Chen SC. Epilepsy and migraine: the dopamine hypotheses. Med Hypotheses
2006;66:46672.48. Steinlein OK. Genetic mechanisms that underlie epilepsy. Nat Rev Neurosci
2004;5:4008.49. Pietrobon D. Biological science of headache channels. Handb Clin Neurol
2010;97:7383.50. De VriesB, FrantsRR, Ferrari MD,van denMaagdenbergAM. Moleculargenetics
of migraine. Hum Genet2009;126:11532.51. Riant F, Ducros A, Ploton C, Banbance C, Depienne C, Tournie-Lasserve E. De
novo mutations in ATP1A2 and CACNA1A are frequent in early-onset sporadichemiplegic migraine. Neurology2010;75:96772.
52. DeFusco M, Marconi R,SilvestriL, et al. Haploinsufficiency of ATP1A2encodingthe Na+/K+ pumpa2subunit associated withfamilia l hemiplegic migraine type2.Nat Genet2003;33:1926.
53. Vanmolkot KR, Kors EE, Hottenga JJ, Terwindt GM, Haan JJ, Hoefnagels WA.Novel mutations in the Na+/K+-ATPase pump gene ATP1A2 associated withfamilial hemiplegic migraine and benign familial infantile convulsions. AnnNeurol2003;54:3606.
54. Dichgans M, Freilinger T, Eckstein G, Babini E, Lorenz-Depiereux B, Biskup S.Mutations in the neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel SCN1A in familialhemiplegic migraine. Lancet2005;366:3717.
55. Gambardella A, Marini C. Clinical spectrum of SCN1A mutations. Epilepsia2009;50:203.
56. Escayg A, Goldin AL. Critical review and invited commentary: sodium channelSCN1A and epilepsy: mutations and mechanisms. Epilepsia2010;51:16508.
57. Jen JC, Wan J, Palos TP. Mutations in the glutamate transporter EAAT1 causesepisodic ataxia, hemiplegia, and seizures. Neurology2005;65:52934.
58. Tzoulis C, Engelsen BA, Telstad W. The spectrum of clinical disease caused bythe A467T and W748S POLG mutations: a study of 26 causes. Brain2006;129:168592.
59. Lonnqvist T, Paeteau A, Valanne L, Pihko H. recessive twinkle mutations causesevere epileptic encephalopathy. Brain2009;132:155362.
60. Ashcroft FM. From molecule to malady. Nature2006;440:4407.
A. Verrotti et al. / Seizure 20 (2011) 271275 275