migration and development – changing paradigms : the turkish case

24
Migration and Development Migration and Development Changing Paradigms Changing Paradigms : : The Turkish case The Turkish case Prof. Dr. Prof. Dr. Ahmet Icduygu Ahmet Icduygu MiReKoc, Migration Research Program MiReKoc, Migration Research Program Department of International Relations Department of International Relations Koç University, Istanbul Koç University, Istanbul Migration and Development: A Euro-Mediterranean Perspective organised by the Hellenic Migration Policy Institute (IMEPO) and the OECD Development Centre Rhodes, Greece, on 26-27 April 2007

Upload: adeola

Post on 11-Jan-2016

44 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Migration and Development – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case. Prof. Dr. Ahmet Icduygu MiReKoc, Migration Research Program Department of International Relations Koç University, Istanbul Migration and Development: A Euro-Mediterranean Perspective - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

Migration and DevelopmentMigration and Development – Changing – Changing ParadigmsParadigms::

The Turkish caseThe Turkish case

Prof. Dr.Prof. Dr. Ahmet IcduyguAhmet IcduyguMiReKoc, Migration Research ProgramMiReKoc, Migration Research ProgramDepartment of International RelationsDepartment of International Relations

Koç University, IstanbulKoç University, Istanbul

Migration and Development: AEuro-Mediterranean Perspective

organised by the Hellenic Migration Policy Institute (IMEPO)and the OECD Development Centre

Rhodes, Greece, on 26-27 April 2007

Page 2: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

Causes and Consequences of Causes and Consequences of EmigrationEmigration

Causes of EmigrationCauses of Emigration Economic hardshipEconomic hardship Social / political / cultural hardshipSocial / political / cultural hardship

Consequences of EmigrationConsequences of Emigration- easing- easing

Economic hardshipEconomic hardship Social / political / cultural hardshipSocial / political / cultural hardship

Page 3: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

What is Development?What is Development?

Consequences of EmigrationConsequences of Emigration- - EasingEasing / Improvement / Improvement

Economic hardshipEconomic hardship Social / political / cultural hardshipSocial / political / cultural hardship

Economic aspectsEconomic aspects Social aspectsSocial aspects Political aspectsPolitical aspects Cultural aspectsCultural aspects

Page 4: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

History of Turkish EmigrationHistory of Turkish Emigration

Four Distinct Periods in Turkish EmigrationFour Distinct Periods in Turkish Emigration

1961 – 19741961 – 1974 : Massive labor migration to Western Europe: Massive labor migration to Western Europe

1974 – 19801974 – 1980 : Decline of labor migration to Western Europe and : Decline of labor migration to Western Europe and the beginning of labor emigration to the beginning of labor emigration to

Arab countriesArab countries

1980s +1980s + : Labor flows to Arab countries + migration : Labor flows to Arab countries + migration to Europe to Europe

1990s +1990s + : Labour migration to the CIS countries + Labor : Labour migration to the CIS countries + Labor flows to Arab countries + migration to Europe.flows to Arab countries + migration to Europe.

Page 5: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

History of Turkish EmigrationHistory of Turkish Emigration

Emigration to Europe (1961-2006)Emigration to Europe (1961-2006)

1961 – 19751961 – 1975 : Labor Migration : Labor Migration

1975 - present1975 - present : + Family Reunification and Marriage Migration : + Family Reunification and Marriage Migration

1980 - present1980 - present : + Clandestine Migration and Asylum Seeking : + Clandestine Migration and Asylum Seeking

Page 6: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

Turkish Labor Migration by Destination, 1961-2005Turkish Labor Migration by Destination, 1961-2005

Host Countries

# % # % # % # % # % # % # %

Europe 790017 97.5 13426 12.8 2612 0.6 9647 2.8 10465 9.3 16561 9.1 842728 42.4

Arab Countries 2441 0.3 74181 70.6 423208 97.7 208274 60.4 32195 28.5 57974 31.9 798273 40.2

Australia 5806 0.7 2647 2.5 2478 0.6 1324 0.4 515 0.5 176 0.1 12946 0.7

CIS Countries - - - 115 0.0 65521 58.0 89623 49.3 155259 7.8

Others 12235 1.5 14792 14.1 4875 1.1 125238 36.3 4256 3.8 17533 9.6 178929 9.0

Total 810499 100 105046 100 433173 100 344598 100 112952 100 181867 100 1988135 100

1996-2000 2001-2005 Total1961-1974 1975-1980 1981-1990 1991-1995

Page 7: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

Europe

Australia

Arap Countries

Others

Total

TurkishTurkish Emigration by Destination, 1961-2005Emigration by Destination, 1961-2005

Page 8: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

Turkish Asylum-Seekers by Destination, 1981-2005Turkish Asylum-Seekers by Destination, 1981-2005

Destination

# % # % # % # % # % # %

Europe 45620 185797 175557 98.6 141226 97.9 107534 97.2 655734 98.7

Canada 755 0.4 1919 1.3 2451 2.2 5125 0.8

Australia 780 0.4 928 0.6 332 0.3 2040 0.3

USA 984 0.6 199 0.1 330 0.3 1513 0.2

Total 178076 100.0 144272 100.0 110647 100.0 664412 100.0

2001-2005 1981-20051981-1985 1986-1990 1991-1995 1996-2000

Page 9: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

Turkish Migrant Stock Abroad, mid-1980s, mid-1990s and mid-2000sTurkish Migrant Stock Abroad, mid-1980s, mid-1990s and mid-2000s Mid-1980s Mid-1990s Mid-2000s

 Country x 1,000 % x 1,000 % x 1,000 %

Austria 75.0 3.2 136.4 4.2 130.0 4.2

Belgium 72.5 3.1 79.5 2.4 50.0 1.6

Denmark 22.0 0.9 37.0 1.1 35.0 1.1

France 146.1 6.3 198.9 6.1 208.0 6.7

Germany 1,400.4 59.9 2,049.9 63.4 1,912.2 61.6

Netherlands 156.4 6.7 167.0 5.1 100.2 3.2

Sweden 22.0 0.9 25.0 0.8 14.0 0.4

Switzerland 51.0 2.2 73.0 2.2 79.5 2.5

UK 10.0 0.4 29.0 0.6 52.0 1.3

Other European countries 42.0 1.8 87.0 2.7 120.0 1.9

Total Europe 1,997.4 85.4 2,852.7 88.3 2,700.9 87.1

Arab countries 200.0 8.6 127.0 3.9 107.0 3.4

Australia 35.0 1.5 45.0 1.4 50.0 1.6

CIS countries 0.0 0.0 50.0 1.5 36.0 1.2

North American countries 80.0 3.4 120.0 3.7 160.0 5.1

Other countries 25.0 1.1 35.0 1.1 50.0 1.6

Total 2,337.4 100.0 3,229.7 100 3,103.9 100.0

Page 10: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

Economic and Social Consequences of Economic and Social Consequences of Turkish Emigration: Gaining from Turkish Emigration: Gaining from

Emigration Emigration

EEmigration in Turkey resultmigration in Turkey resultss in a mixture of in a mixture of benefits and costs. benefits and costs.

EconomicEconomic consequencesconsequences Socio-political and cultural consequencesSocio-political and cultural consequences

Page 11: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

Economic Consequences Economic Consequences

TTwowo basic approaches basic approaches::

OOptimisticptimistic: : the “balanced growth” the “balanced growth” (equilibrium) model (equilibrium) model

a positive impact a positive impact and and an increase in the national balance of trade an increase in the national balance of trade domestic investment, domestic investment, and and economic growth. economic growth.

PPessimisticessimistic:: the the “asymmetric growth” “asymmetric growth” (conflict) (conflict) model model

the displacement of labourthe displacement of labour to industrialized countries distorts and slows to industrialized countries distorts and slows down the development in the migrants’ areas of origindown the development in the migrants’ areas of origin..

Page 12: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

Economic ConsequencesEconomic Consequences

TThe beneficial effects of workers’ he beneficial effects of workers’ remittancesremittances The role of the remittances in The role of the remittances in the perennial foreign-exchange crisisthe perennial foreign-exchange crisis

The The investmentsinvestments made by migrants – limited made by migrants – limited the maintenance of the family left behindthe maintenance of the family left behind and and investment in investment in

equipment, building, carequipment, building, car etc. etc.

a positive impact on household welfarea positive impact on household welfare improvements in the living conditions of migrantsimprovements in the living conditions of migrants

Page 13: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

Economic ConsequencesEconomic Consequences

The The reduction in unemployment and reduction in unemployment and underemployment underemployment helped to reduce unemployment pressures in Turkeyhelped to reduce unemployment pressures in Turkey..

TThe acquisition of skillhe acquisition of skills and the process of return s and the process of return

migrationmigration State: State: skills failed to match Turkey’s need skills failed to match Turkey’s need in human resources in human resources IIndividualndividual: : the same mismatch engenders personal the same mismatch engenders personal

disillusionment.disillusionment.

Page 14: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

Gaining from Emigration: Economic Gaining from Emigration: Economic ConsequencesConsequences

State activitiesState activities t to o channel remittance savings channel remittance savings to to maximize economic growthmaximize economic growth

WWorkers’ joint stock companiesorkers’ joint stock companies Village Development CooperativesVillage Development Cooperatives

State Industry and Workers’ Investment Bank State Industry and Workers’ Investment Bank in 1975in 1975

Page 15: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

Remittance Inflows, Exports, and Imports in Turkish Economy, 1964-1985

Remittance Exports Imports

(x Million USD)(x Million USD)

(x Million USD)

1964 8 411 537 6,3 0,1

1965 69.8 464 572 64,6 0,6

1966 115.3 490 718 50,6 0,8

1967 93 523 685 57,4 0,6

1968 107.3 496 764 40 0,6

1969 140.6 537 801 53,3 0,7

1970 273 588 948 75,8 1,5

1971 471.4 677 1171 95,4 2,7

1972 740 885 1563 109,1 3,3

1973 1183 1317 2086 153,8 4,1

1974 1425 1532 3777 63,5 3,6

1975 1313 1401 4738 39,3 2,7

1976 982 1960 5129 31 1,8

1977 930 1753 5797 23 1,5

1978 983 2288 4599 42,5 1,4

1979 1694 2261 5069 60,3 2,2

1980 2071 2910 7909 41,4 3

1981 2490 4703 8933 58,9 3,4

1982 2140 5746 8843 69,1 3,2

1983 1513 5728 9235 43,1 2,4

1984 1807 7134 10757 49,9 3

1985 1714 8255 11344 55,5 2,5

YearRemittance as % of

Trade DeficitRemittance as %

of GNP

Page 16: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

Remittance Inflows, Exports, and Imports in Turkish Economy, 1985-2004

Remittance Exports Imports

(x Million USD)

(x Million USD)

(x Million USD)

1985 1714 8255 11344 55,5 2,5

1986 1634 7457 11105 44,8 2,1

1987 1021 10190 14158 25,7 1,2

1988 1776 11662 14335 66,4 2

1989 3040 12960 15792 107,3 2,8

1990 3243 13626 22302 37,4 2,21991 2819 13672 21038 38,3 1,91992 3008 14891 22872 37,7 1,91993 2919 15610 29428 21,1 1,61994 2627 18390 23270 53,8 21995 3327 21975 35709 24,2 21996 3542 32446 43627 31,7 1,91997 4197 32647 48599 26,3 2,21998 5356 31220 45922 36,4 2,61999 4529 29325 40671 39,9 2,52000 4560 31375 54503 19,7 2,32001 2786 35000 41399 43,5 1,92002 1936 35753 51554 12,3 1,12003 1710 47068 69340 7,7 0,72004 804 63121 97540 2,3 0,2

Year

Remittance as % of Trade Deficit

Remittance as % of GNP

Page 17: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

1964

1966

1968

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

Remittance Inflow

Remittance Inflows in Turkish Economy in Million USD, 1964-2004

Page 18: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

4

4,5

Remittance as % of GNP

Remittances as % of GNP, 1964-2004

Page 19: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

Gaining from Migration: Social Gaining from Migration: Social ConsequencesConsequences

Emigration is an important source for Emigration is an important source for

social changesocial change

Changes in generation and gender relationshipsChanges in generation and gender relationships The changing status of womenThe changing status of women The positive impact on the roles and relationships of The positive impact on the roles and relationships of

parents and childrenparents and children TThe improvement of the migrants’ quality of lifehe improvement of the migrants’ quality of life

Page 20: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

Gaining from Migration: Socio-Gaining from Migration: Socio-political Consequencespolitical Consequences

SSocio-political changesocio-political changes

MMore respect for human rights and democracy ore respect for human rights and democracy

DDual citizenship rights, the changing status of ual citizenship rights, the changing status of military service for emigrantsmilitary service for emigrants

Page 21: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

UnintendedUnintended Consequences of the Consequences of the Turkish Emigration Turkish Emigration

Cultural-revivalist tendencies among the Turkish Cultural-revivalist tendencies among the Turkish migrants abroad migrants abroad – – Muslim fundamentalism and Kurdish nationalismMuslim fundamentalism and Kurdish nationalism

Problems related to return migration and second-Problems related to return migration and second-generation returnees generation returnees – – RReintegration and adeintegration and adooptation problemsptation problems

The decrease in the population growth but increase in The decrease in the population growth but increase in east-to-west and rural-to-urban migration east-to-west and rural-to-urban migration

Page 22: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

Naturalization Naturalization of Turkof Turkish Citizensish Citizens by Country by Country of New Citizenship of New Citizenship

(x 1,000)(x 1,000)

CountryCountry 1991-19931991-1993 1994-19961994-1996 1997-19991997-1999 2000-20022000-2002 1991-20021991-2002

AustriaAustria 4.74.7 6.66.6 7.87.8 18.318.3 37.4

BelgiumBelgium 7.27.2 13.013.0 17.517.5 31.731.7 69.4

DenmarkDenmark 1.11.1 2.62.6 5.45.4 5.95.9 15.0

FranceFrance 2.82.8 8.88.8 14.514.5 13.813.8 39.9

GermanyGermany 20.320.3 97.097.0 129.1129.1 159.4159.4 405.8

NetherlandsNetherlands 29.529.5 87.687.6 39.939.9 10.210.2 167.2

SwedenSweden 5.85.8 7.67.6 4.94.9 4.24.2 22.5

SwitzerlandSwitzerland 1.41.4 3.63.6 6.26.2 6.26.2 17.4

UKUK 0.2 0.5 2.0 2.5 5.2

TotalTotal 73.0 227.3 227.3 251.2 778.8

Page 23: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

Concluding RemarksConcluding RemarksChanging Paradigms of Migration and DevelopmentChanging Paradigms of Migration and Development

1960-1980: Statism1960-1980: Statism

Import-substitutionImport-substitution

State interventionState intervention

ProtectionismProtectionism

Remittances: more importantRemittances: more important

Economic consequences: more importantEconomic consequences: more important

1980-onwards: Liberalism1980-onwards: Liberalism Free tradeFree trade Stock exchangeStock exchange

Remittances: less importantRemittances: less important

(growing importance of FDI)(growing importance of FDI)

Social/political/cultural consequences: more Social/political/cultural consequences: more importantimportant

Page 24: Migration and Development  – Changing Paradigms : The Turkish case

Thank YouThank You