Department of Mathematics and Science

Millard E. Lightburn, Ph.D.District Science Supervisor

Mary Tweedy, Noreyda Casañas, Daniel Gangeri

Curriculum Support Specialists

DATA ANALYSIS GRADE K-5

Elementary Science Liaisons and Coaches iCAD Session 1 (Sept 2014)

Data can…provide feedback on the past andprovide a basis to begin planningfor the future

What Kind of Information can Data Provide us?

Department of Mathematics and Science

IMPORTANCE OF DATA

• Facilitate a clear understanding of the gaps between where the school or class is and where it wants to be.

• Show if school or class goals and objectives are being accomplished.

• Predict and prevent failures.• Predict and ensure successes.• Establish foundation for Continuous School

Improvement/SIP.• Data drives instruction, and professional

development.

Department of Mathematics and Science

Effective Use of Classroom Data

Effective Use of Classroom Data

TeachingUsingResults

Planning

StudentLearning

Assessing

Source: Dr. Yuwadee Wongbundhit

• GRADE K-5 BASELINE AND PRETEST ASSESSMENT RESULTS (2014-2015)

DATA DISAGGREGATION

Department of Mathematics and Science

Science Pretest Results K-5 (MDCPS 2013-2014)

GRADE Students Tested

% Below Mastery

% At Mastery

Average Performance

KINDERGARTEN 2013 2014

9,5094,462

58%60%

42%40%

62%61%

FIRST 2013 2014

10,2495,657

90%88%

10%12%

47%48%

SECOND 2013 2014

11,5656,020

80%78%

20%22%

51%53%

THIRD 2013 2014

13,2696,784

96%96%

4%4%

41%43%

FOURTH 2013 2014

12,5636,760

94%95%

6%5%

44%45%

FIFTH 2013 2014

22,67221,681

93%92%

7%8%

46%48%

Elementary Science Pretest Performance by Reporting Category (2013-2014)

GRADE LEVEL

LIFE SCIENCE

PHYSICALSCIENCE

EARTH & SPACE

NATURE OF SCIENCE

KINDER 62% 66% 59%

FIRST 53% 51% 42%

SECOND 49% 55% 47%

THIRD 37% 44% 50% 29%

FOURTH 2013 2014

49%49%

47% 42%34%

37%

FIFTH 2013 2014

45%47%

52%54%

43%45%

36%38%

Your thoughts…..• What reporting category do you think showed

the highest performance? Why?• What reporting category do you think showed

the lowest performance? Why?• How do you think the students performed on

the Fair Game benchmarks? Do you think they performed better than last year?

DATA DISAGGREGATION (Baseline 2013-14)

Department of Mathematics and Science

Grade 5 Baseline Assessment Results (District 2012-2014)

Year Assessment Student Tested

Average % Correct

Percent Proficient (70%)

2011 Baseline 24,141 45% 5%

2012 Baseline 23,076 47% 6%

2013 Baseline 22,672 46% 7%

2014 Baseline 21, 681 48% 8%

Question Group

Baseline 2011

Baseline 2012

Baseline 2013

Baseline2014

Nature of Sc 35% 38% 36% 38%

Earth Space

42% 45% 43% 45%

Physical Sc 51% 53% 52% 54%Life Science 46% 47% 45% 47%

Benchmarks 2012 Results

2013 Results

Difference (2013-2012) (%)

2014Results

Difference (2014-2013)

(%)

SC.3.L.14.1 37% 34% -3 37% +3

SC.4.E.5.4 42% 41% -1 44% +3

SC.4.E.6.2 30% 29% -1 33% +4

SC.4.E.6.3 50% 49% -1 51% +2

SC.4.E.6.4 41% 38% -3 42% +4

SC.4.L.16.4 46% 43% -3 46% +3

SC.4.L.17.3 51% 49% -2 52% +3

SC.5.N.1.1 32% 30% -2 32% +2

SC.5.N.2.1 35% 35% -0 35% 0

SC.5.N.2.2 50% 48% -2 50% +2

SC.5.E.5.1 60% 60% -0 59% +1

SC.5.E.5.3 55% 55% -0 56% +1

SC.5.E.7.1 37% 36% -1 37% +1

Comparison of Grade 5 Baseline Results 2012 - 2014

Benchmarks 2012 Results

2013 Results

Difference (2013-2012)

(%)

2014Results

Difference (2014-2013) (%)

SC.5.E.7.3 42% 39% -3 40% +1SC.5.P.8.1 56% 57% +1 57% 0SC.5.P.8.3 55% 51% -4 54% +3SC.5.P.9.1 44% 44% 0 46% +2SC.5.P.10.1 76% 74% -2 79% +5SC.5.P.10.2 52% 51% -1 49% -2SC.5.P.10.4 47% 46% -1 48% +2SC.5.P.13.1 48% 49% +1 51% +2SC.5.P.13.2 46% 44% -2 48% +4

SC.5.L.14.1 55% 54% -1 53% -1SC.5.L.14.2 44% 42% -2 44% +2

SC.5.L.17.1 48% 47% -1 47% 0

Comparison of Grade 5 Baseline Results 2012 and 2013

Grade 5 Science Assessments Calendar(2014-2015)

Baseline: August 18 – Sept 5, 2014 Fall IA: Oct 27 – November 14, 2014 Winter IA: Jan 26 - February 13, 2015

FCAT 2015: (April 13 - May 8, 2015)

Assessments• Interim Assessments (IA) for Grade 5

(All benchmarks will be assessed on Gr 5 Baseline, Fall and Winter assessments)

• Quarterly Science Benchmark Assessments (QSBA) for Grades K- 4 will assess benchmarks covered in each quarter: Quarters 1, 2, 3, 4

• QSBA for K-4 will be administered at the end of each grading period.

• QSBA Quarter 1 Admin window: Oct 27 – Nov 14, 2014 Available: First QSBA available October 22, 2014

13

Department of Mathematics and Science

• Grade 5 Science Interim cut scores are based on statistical regression analysis between students performance on Interim Assessment and scale scores on 2012 FCAT 2.0:

• Fall IA satisfactory cut score: 51% or higher• Winter IA satisfactory cut score: 53% or higher• (Cut Scores)• Baseline Proficiency Level: 70%

Gr. 5 Science Interims Cut Scores

Department of Mathematics and Science

Your thoughts…..• What reporting category do you think showed

the highest performance? Why?• What reporting category do you think showed

the lowest performance? Why?• How did our performance compare to the

State, Broward and West Palm Beach?

DATA DISAGGREGATION (FCAT 2014 Results)

Department of Mathematics and Science

FCAT Science - Grade 5

Year Total Students Tested

% Levels 3-5

Physical/Chemical Earth/Space Life/Environmental Scientific Thinking

Possible Points

Avg. % Correct

Possible Points

Avg. % Correct Possible Points Avg. % Correct Possible

PointsAvg. % Correct

2014 25,638 51 16 69% 16 69% 14 64% 10 70%

2013 25,560 51 16 63% 16 75% 14 71% 10 60%

2012 26,208 49 16 63% 16 69% 14 71% 10 70%

2011 26,422 49 13 69% 11 64% 13 69% 14 64%

2010 26,367 44 14 64% 10 70% 13 62% 14 57%

2009 25,801 42 12 58% 13 54% 13 62% 13 54%

2008 25,875 39 12 58% 14 50% 13 62% 12 58%

2007 25,993 34 12 50% 15 47% 12 50% 12 50%

GRADE 5 SCIENCE FCAT RESULTS 2007-2014 DISTRICT LEVEL

Performance by Reporting Categories (Gr 5 Science FCAT) 2012-2014 (Retro)

Nature of Science

Earth and Space

Physical Science

Life Science0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80 70%69%

63%71%

60%

75%

63%71%70% 69% 69%

64%

FCAT 2012FCAT 2013FCAT 2014

Reporting Categories

PERC

ENT

(%)

Performance by achievement levels (Gr 5 Science FCAT 2012-14)

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 50

5

10

15

20

25

3025% 25%

27%

12% 11%

24% 24%26%

12%13%

24%26% 27%

12%11%

FCAT 2012FCAT 2013FCAT 2014

Achievement Levels

PERCENT (%)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

10

20

30

40

50

60

34%39% 42% 44%

49% 49% 51%

Grade 5 Science FCAT Results 2007-2013 (District) (2012 and 2013 FCAT 2.0) (Levels 3-5))

YEARS

PERC

ENT

(%)

Grade 5 FCAT Science Comparative Results for MDCPS, State, Broward & Palm Beach (2012-2014)

State MDCPS BROWARD PALM BEACH0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

52% 49% 50%56%53% 51%

49%

60%54% 51%

49

57%

201220132014

State and South Florida Counties

PERC

ENT

(%)

2014 FLORIDA COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT TEST® 2.0 (FCAT 2.0)

NEXT GENERATION SUNSHINE STATE STANDARDS

State Report of District Results

Grade 05

SCIENCE

                             

    Total Test Scores

 

Mean Points Earned

          % in each Achievement Level By Content Area

Grade

District

Number

District Name

Number of Students

Mean Scale Score 1 2 3 4 5

Percentage

Passing (Achieve

ment Levels 3

and Above)

Nature of Scien

ce

Earth and Spac

e Scien

ce

Physical

Science

Life Scien

ce

05 Number of Points Possible             10 16 16 14

05 00 STATE TOTALS 195,645 201 21 25 28 13 13 54 7 11 11 10

05 06 BROWARD 18,705 199 25 26 26 12 11 49 7 11 11 9

05 13 MIAMI DADE 25,638 199 24 26 27 12 11 51 7 11 11 9

05 50 PALM BEACH 12,968 203 18 25 28 14 15 57 7 11 12 10

Source: Florida Department of EducationGr 5 Science FCAT 2.0 Scale Score L1 140 - 184 L2 185 - 199 L3 200 - 214 L4 215 – 224 L5 225 - 260

-School Performance Data, FCAT, Baseline and Interims http://oada.dadeschools.net

http://curriculum.dadeschools.net

https://thinkgate.net/FLMiamiDade/

Data Online Resources