milner's cases and materials on contracts
TRANSCRIPT
~1<F To \
d7 A'U,£L
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1: REMEDIES FOR BREACH OF PROMISE
1. The Interests Protected
2. Problems in Measuring Damages
3. Remoteness
4. Intangible Injuries
5. Mitigation
6. Specific Performance
7. Time of Measuring Damages
8. Restitution
CHAPTER 11: ENFORCEABILITY
1. Bargains
A. Preliminary Negotiations
B. Power of Acceptance
C. Problems of Correspondence
D. The Bargain Theory
E. Mutual Promises
F. Pre-existing Duty
G. Compromises
2. Intention
3. Non-Bargain Promises
A. The Seal
B. Past Consideration
C. Subsequent Reliance
4. Unilateral Contracts
CHAPTER 111: THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES
CHAPTER IV: THIRD PARTIES AND MISTAKE
1. Mistake of Identify
2. Documents Mistakenly Signed
CHAPTER V: WRITTEN DOCUMENTS
1. Unsigned Documents (The Ticket Cases)
2. Parol Evidence Rule
3. Rectification
CHAPTER VI: PROTECTION OF WEAKER PARTIES
1. Infants
2. Forfeitures
3. Clauses Excluding Liability
4. Unconscionability
5. Consumer Protection
CHAPTER VI1: PUBLIC POLICY
CHAPTER VI11: PERFORMANCE AND BREACH
CHAPTER IX: MISTAKE
1. Misrepresentation
2. Mistake As To Contractual Terms
3. Mistake in Assumptions
CHAPTER X: UNEXPECTED CHANGES IN CIRCUMSTANCES
1. Relaxation Of The Rule Of Absolute Promises
2. Relief On Terms: Restitution And Reliance
CHAPTER XI : STATUTE OF FRAUDS
ANALYTICAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER I: REMEDIES FOR BREACH OF PROMISE
1. The Interests Protected
Fuller and Perdue "The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages"
Sally Wertheim v. Chicoutimi Pulp Company
Bollenback v. Continental Casualty Company
Anglia Television Ltd. v. Reed
A.I. Ogus, "Damages for Pre-Contract Expenditure"
Pitcher v. Shoebottom
Problem
Ontario Asphalt Block Co. v. Montreuil
Vendors And Purchasers Act
Wroth v. Tyler
2. Problems in Measuring Damages
Cotter v. General Petroleums Ltd.
Carson v. Willitts
Groves v. John Wunder Co.
Note on Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal $ Mining Co.
Problems
The Sale of Goods Act
Thompson (W.L.) Ltd. v. Robinson (Gunmakers) Ltd
Charter v. Sullivan
3. Remoteness
British Columbia Saw Mills Co. v. Mettleship
Hadley v. Baxendale
Jackson, J.H. "Contract Law in Modem Society,"
Questions § Problems
Fuller and Perdue "The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages"
Home v. The Midland Railway Company
Hydraulic Engineering Co. Ltd v. McHaffie
Rivers v. George White § Sons Co.
Kinghome v. The Montreal Telegraph Co.
Victoria Laundry Ltd. v. Newman Industries Ltd.
Questions
Munroe Equipment Sales Ltd. v. Canadian Forest Products Ltd
Scyrup v. Economy Tractor Parts Ltd
Koufos v. C. Czamikow, Ltd.
Note on Freedhof v. Pomalift Industries Ltd.
Problems
I-I
1-2
1-3
1-6
1-8
1-8
1-9
1-10
1-13
1-14
1-15
1-18
1-18
1-21
1-22
1-23
1-23
1-24
1-26
1-26
1-27
1-28
1-28
1-29
1-30
1-30
1-30
1-30
1-34
1-34
1-35
1-40
1-45
1-45
4. Intangible Injuries
Addis v. Gramophone Company Limited 1-46
Kolan v. Solicitor 1-48
D. v. B. 1-48
The Evidence Act 1-49
New York Laws 1-49
Herbert Clayton and Jack Waller Ltd. v. Oliver 1-49
Jarvis v. Swans Tours Ltd. 1-50
Heywood v. Wellers 1-52
5. Mitigation
Payzu Limited v. Saunders 1-53
Roth § Co. v. Taysen, Townsend 8 Co. 1-55
Problems 1-56
White 8 Carter (Councils), Ltd. v. McGregor 1-57
Langford 8 Co. Ltd. v. Dutch 1-58
Finelli et al. v. Dee et al. 1-62
Note on Hounslow London Borough Council v. Twickenham 1-63 Garden Developments Ltd.
Problem 1-63
6. Specific Performance
Stewart v.Kennedy 1-64
Falcke v. Gray 1-64
Coster v. Long and Bisby 1-65
Cohen v. Roche 1-65
Question 1-66
Sky Petroleum Ltd. v. V.I.P. Petroleum Ltd 1-66
Behnke v. Bede Shipping Co. Ltd. 1-68
Gilbert v. Barron 1-68
Tanenbaum v. W.J. Bell Paper Co. Ltd. 1-69
Ryan v. Mutual Tontine Westminister Chambers Association 1-73
Warner Bros. Pictures Incorporated v. Nelson 1-75
Detroit Football Co. v. Dublinski 1-78
Page One Records Ltd v. Britton 1-79
7. Time Of Measuring Damages
Wroth v. Tyler I - 82
R.G. Lawson, "Damages - An Appraisal of Wroth v. Tyler" I_ 88
Miliangos v. Geo. Frank (Textiles) Ltd I_ 89
Note I- 93
8. Restitution
Erlanger v. The New Sombrero Phosphate Company I_ 94
Deglman v. Guaranty Trust Co. and Constantineau I- 95
Question I - 96
Boone v. Coe I- 97
Moses v. Macferlan 1-97
Note 1-98
J.D. McCamus, "Restitutionary Remedies, Law Society of Upper Canada, Special Lecture Series" I_98
Chapter II: ENFORCEABILITY
Cohen, "The Basis of Contract" II-1
1. Bargains
A. Preliminary Negotiations
Denton v. Great Northern Railway Company II-2
Questions II-4
Anderson v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co. II-4
Warlow v. Harrison II-6
Harris v. Nickerson II-6
Spencer and Another v. Harding 11-8
Johnstone Brothers v. Rogers Brothers II-9
Harvey v. Facey II-11
Problem 11-12
Grainger $ Son v. Gough 11-12
Boyer and Co. v. D. § R Duke 11-12
Rooke v. Dawson 11-12
Storer v. Manchester City Council 11-13
Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd. 11-15
Questions 11-16
Fisher v. Bell 11-16
R. v. Bermuda Holdings Ltd. 11-16
Question 11-16
Swiss Federal Code of Obligations 11-16
Problem 11-17
Bristol, Cardiff, and Swansea Aerated Bread Company v. Maggs 11-17
Bellamy v. Debenham 11-18
Harvey v. Perry 11-18
Pinsonneault v. Lesperance 11-19
Spottiswoode, Ballantyne £ Co. Ltd v. Doreen Appliances Ltd and G. Barclay (London) Ltd. 11-19
British American Timber Co. v. Elk River Timber Co. 11-21
Green v. Ainsmore Consolidated Mines Ltd. 11-23
Problem 11-24
May and Butcher, Limited v. The King 11-24
W.N. Hillas and Co. Limited v. Arcos, Limited 11-26
Problems 11-30
Foley v. Classique Coaches Limited 11-30
Scammell (G.) and Nephew Limited v. Ouston y 11-33
Calvin Consolidated Oil 8 Gas Ltd. v. Manning 11-35
P.G. Sykes (Wessex) Ltd. v. Fine Fare, Ltd 11-37
Thomson Groceries Ltd. v. Scott 11-37
Buyers v. Begg 11-38
Bahamaconsult Ltd. v. Kellogg Salada Canada Ltd. 11-38
Uniform Commercial Code s. 2-204 11-45
Problem 11-46
Nicolene, Limited v. Simmonds 11-46
B. The Power of Acceptance
Shatford v. B.C. Wine Growers Ltd. 11-46
Manchester Diocesan Council For Education v. Commercial £ General Investments Ltd. 11-47
Problem 11-47
Dominion Building Corporation Ltd. v. The King 11-48
Larkin v. Gardiner 11-48
Powell v. Lee 11-49
Cooke v. Oxley 11-49
Dickinson v. Dodds 11-49
Questions 11-50
German Civil Code s. 145 11-51
Uniform Commercial Code s. 2-205 11-51
Notes 11-51
Dickinson v. Dodds 11-51
Bradbury v. Morgan 11-51
Questions 11-52
Offord v. Davies 11-52
Felthouse v. Bindley 11-53
Lucy v. Mouflet 11-54
Wheeler v. Klaholt 11-54
Day v. McLea 11-55
Restatement of The Law of Contracts (Second) Tentative Draft s. 72 11-55
Newspapers and Periodicals Subscription Act 11-55
Consumer Protection Act 11-56
Problem 11-56
Eliason v. Henshaw 11-57
Notes § Questions 11-57
Manchester Diocesan Council For Education v. Commercial § General Investments Ltd. 11-58
Hyde v. Wrench 11-58
Note 11-58
Stevenson, Jacques & Co. v. McLean 11-59
Re Cowan and Boyd 11-60
Problems 11-61
British Road Services v. Arthur V. Crutchley $ Co. Ltd. 11-61
Anglo-Newfoundland Fish Co. v. Smith & Co. Ltd. 11-62
Uniform Commercial Code s. 2-206 11-62
Note 11-62
Roto-Lith Ltd. v. F.P. Bartlett § Co. Inc. J 11-63
C. Contracts Negotiated By Correspondence
Tinn v. Hoffman and Company 11-64
Adams and Others v. Lindsell and Another 11-65
Questions 11-66
Household Insurance Co. v. Grant 11-66
Note 11-69
Reidpaths Case 11-69
Henthom v. Fraser 11-70
Dunlop v. Higgins 11-71
Byrne $ Co. v. Leon Van Tienhoven $ Co. 11-71
Question 11-72
Howell Securities Ltd. v. Hughes 11-73
Charlebois v. Baril 11-74
Notes 8 Questions 11-75
Underwood $ Son Ltd. v. Maguire 11-75
Post Office Act 11-75
Note 11-75
Milinkovich v. Canadian Mercantile Insurance Co. 11-75
Smith $ Osberg Ltd. v. Hollenbeck 11-76
Carow Towing Co. v. The "Ed Williams" 11-77
Melady v. Jenkins Steamship Co 11-77
Entores Ltd. v. Miles Far East Corporation 11-77
Question 11-78
Restatement of Contracts (Second) ss. 64-66 11-78
Problem 11-78
D. Consideration: The Bargain Theory
Currie v. Misa 11-80
Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. v. Selfridge § Co 11-80
Westlake v. Adams 11-80
Hobbes, Leviathan 11-80
Vernon v. Bethell 11-80
Note on Legal Method 11-80
Note on The History of Consideration 11-81
White (Executor) v. William Bluett 11-82
Questions 11-82
Sharon v. Sharon 11-82
Dunton v. Dunton 11-83
Questions 11-83
Schnell v. Nell 11-83
Eleanor Thomas v. Benjamin Thomas 11-83
Questions 11-84
Vanbergen v. St. Edmunds Properties, Ltd. 11-84
E. Mutual Promises
Thorp v. Thorp 11-85
Harrison v. Cage 11-85
Note on Legal Method 11-85
The Great Northern Railway Company v. Witham 11-86
Questions 11-87
Percival v. London Etc. Committee 11-87
In Re The Gloucester Municipal Election Petition 11-87
Regina v. Demers 11-87
Berlin Machine Works, Limited v. Randolph § Baker 11-88
Greenberg v. Lake Simcoe Ice Supply Co 11-88
Tobias v. Dick and T. Eaton Co 11-88
Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon 11-89
Questions 11-89
Holt v. Ward Clarencieux 11-90
F. Pre-Existing Duty
Harris v. Watson 11-90
Stilk v. Myrick 11-91
Hartley v. Ponsonby 11-91
Questions 11-91
Holmes The Common Law 11-91
Note 11-91
Smith v. Dawson 11-92
Shadwell v. Shadwell 11-92
De Cicco v. Schweizer 11-94
Scotson and Others v. Pegg 11-95
McDevitt v. Stokes 11-96
England v. Davidson 11-96
Note 11-96
Reif v. Page 11-96
Law Revision Committee, Sixth Interim Report 11-96
Raggow v. Scougall and Co 11-97
Problem 11-97
Foakes v. Beer 11-98
Note 11-99
History of Subsequent Fate of Foakes v. Beer 11-100
The Administration of Justice Act 11-101
Rommerill v. Gardener II-101
McManus v. Bank 11-103
Questions 11-103
Couldery v. Bartrum 11-103
Law Revision Committee, Sixth Interim Report 11-103
G. Compromises
Cook v. Wright 11-104
Callisher v. Bischoffsheim 11-104
Miles v. New Zealand Alford Estate Co. 11-105
Alliance Bank v. Broom 11-106
Fairgrief v. Ellis 11-106
Intention
Weeks v. Tvbald 11-107
Stamper v. Temple 11-107
Balfour v. Balfour 11-108
McGregor v. McGregor 11-109
Simpkins v. Pays 11-109
Merritt v. Merritt 11-110
Jones v. Padavatton 11-111
Rose and Frank Company v. J.R. Crompton 8 Brothers 11-114
Jones v. Vernons Pools Ltd. 11-115
Upton-On-Severn Rural District Council v. Powell 11-116
Questions 11-116
Pollock On Contracts 11-117
Williston on Contracts 11-117
Questions 11-117
A. The Seal
Ezra and Edward Zwicker v. Eri Zwicker 11-118
Sharington v. Strotton 11-119
Fuller, "Consideration and Form" 11-119
Chilliback v. Pawliuk 11-120
Note 11-122
Martin v. Barnes 11-123
Linton v. Royal Bank of Canada 11-123
The Land Titles Act 11-123
Note On the Abolition of Seals 11-123
Quebec Civil Code 11-123
Comparative Law Note 11-124
Law Revision Committee, Sixth Interim Report 11-124
B. Past Consideration
Lampleigh v. Brathwait 11-125
Kennedy v. Broun 11-125
Stewart v. Casey 11-125
Question of Legal Method 11-125
Roscorla v. Thomas 11-125
Note 11-126
Edmunds v. Mister 11-12?
Statute of Frauds 11-127
Maccord v. Osborne 11-127
Thrupp v. Fielder 11-127
Spencer v. Hemmerde 11-128
The Limitations Act 11 -130
Note On Legislative Drafting 11-131
Subsequent Reliance
Llewellyn "What Price Contract? An Essay In Perspective" 11-131
Dalhousie College v. Boutilier Estate 11-135
Question 11-137
C.A. Wright, Case Comment 11-137
Public Subscriptions Act 11-138
Note 11-138
Ames, "The History of Assumpsit" 11-139
Baxter v. Jones 11-139
De La Bere v. Pearson Limited 11-139
Kirksey v. Kirksey 11-140
Skidmore v. Bradford 11-140
Maddison v. Alderson 11 -140
Hubbs v. Black 11-140
Loranger v. Haines 11-141
Central London Property Trust Limited v.
House Limited
High Trees
11-141
Imperator Realty Co Inc v. Tull 11-143
Combe v. Combe 11-144
D.$ C. Builders Ltd v. Rees 11-147
John Burrows Ltd. v. Subsurface Surveys Ltd 11-149
Uniform Commercial Code s. 2-209 11-152
Restatement of Contracts (Second) s. 90 11-153
Problem 11-153
4. Unilateral Contracts
Williams v. Carwardine
Lockhart v. Barnard
Gibbons v. Proctor
Fitch v. Snedaker
The Crown v. Clarke
CarMl v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company
Wood v. Letrik Limited
Bishop v. Eaton
Goldthorpe v. Logan
Note
Sloan v. Union Oil Company of Canada Ltd.
Grant v. Province of New Brunswick
Errington v. Errington
Dawson v. Helicopter Exploration Co. Ltd.
Restatement of Contracts (Second) ss. 24, 31, 45 , 63
Uniform Commercial Code s. 2-206
II-15 3
11-15 4
11-154
11-155
II-15 5
11-156
11-15 7
11-157
11-158
11-159
11-159
11-16 1
11-164
11-165
11-16 7
11-167
CHAPTER III: THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES
Tweddle v. Atkinson
Drive Yourself Hire Co. Ltd. v. Strutt
Beswick v. Beswick
1. The Common Law
2. Equity
3. Conclusion
Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd. v. Selfridge & Co. Ltd.
The Satanita
Mulholland v. Merriam
Les Affreteurs Reunis Societe Anonyme v. Leopold Walford
(London) Limited
Note on the Trust Concept
Young v. Canadian Northern Railway Co.
The Labour Relations Act
Re Schebsman
Note
Note
Re Schebsman
Jackson v. Horizon Holidays Ltd.
Midland Silicones Ltd. v. Scruttons Ltd.
Note on Legal Method
New Zealand Shipping Co. Ltd. v. A.M. Satterthwaite § Co. Ltd.
Restatement of the Law of Contracts (Second) ss. 133, 135-8, 140-2
144, 147
111 -1
111 - 2
111 — 2
111 - 3
111 - 5
111 - 6
111 - 8
III-10
111 -11
111 — 13
III-13
111 —14
III-15
III-15
III-15 i
III-15
III-16
III-18
III-21
III-21
111 - 2 3
111-26
III-27
II1-28
Quebec Civil Code art. 1029
Problem
CHAPTER IV: THIRD PARTIES AND MISTAKE
1. Mistake of Identity
Boulton v. Jones IV-1
Cundy v. Lindsay IV-2
King's Norton Metal Co. Ltd. v. Edridge, Merrett § Co. Ltd. IV-4
Ingram v. Little IV-5
Lewis v. Averay IV-9
2. Documents Mistakenly Signed
Foster v. Mackinnon IV-12
Howatson v. Webb IV-13
Carlisle and Cumberland Banking Co. v. Bragg IV-14
Prudential Trust Co. Ltd. v. Cugnet IV-15
Saunders v. Anglia Building Society (Gallie v. Lee) IV-18
CHAPTER V: WRITTEN DOCUMENTS
1. Unsigned Documents (The Ticket Cases)
Parker v. The South Eastern Railway Company V-l
Lamont v. Canadian Transfer Co. Ltd. V-4
Chapelton v. Barry Urban District Council V-4
Olley v. Marlborough Court Ltd. V-5
J. Spurling Ltd. v. Bradshaw V-5
Question V-5
McCutcheon v. MacBrayne V-5
Thornton v. Shoe Lane Parking Ltd. V-9
British Crane Hire Corp. Ltd. v. Ipswich Plant Hire Ltd. V-ll
2 . Parol Evidence Rule
Prenn v. Simmonds V-16
Longley v. Barbrick • V-20
Note V-21
Collins v. Forest Hill Investment Corp. Ltd. V-21
Farah v. Barki V-22
Royal Bank of Canada v. Hale V-23
Curtis v. Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co. Ltd. V-25
Hawrish v. Bank of Montreal V-25
Morgan v. Griffith V-28
Angell v. Duke V-28
Note V-28
Pym v. Campbell V-29
Alampi v. Swartz V-29
Corbin on Contracts V-35
Long v. Smith V-35
Ferland v. Keith V-36
City and Westminster Properties (1934) Ltd. v. Mudd V-39
Mendelssohn v. Normand Ltd. V-40
Jaques v. Lloyd D. George 8 Partners, Ltd. V-42
3. Rectification
U.S.A. v. Motor Trucks, Limited Vt44
Bercovici v. Palmer V-46
Joscelyne v. Nissen V-49
Paget v. Marshall V-55
Note V-57
Problem V-57
CHAPTER VI: PROTECTION OF WEAKER PARTIES
1. Infants
Rex v. Rash VI-1
Sale of Goods Act VI-2
Infants Act VI-2
Nash v. Inman VI-3
2. Forfeitures
Shatilla v. Feinstein VI-6
Howe v. Smith VI-8
Stockloser v. Johnson VI-10
Gisvold v. Hill VI-11
3. Clauses Excluding Liability
Canadian-Dominion Leasing Corp. Ltd. v. Suburban Superdrug Ltd. VI-12
Suisse Atlantique Societe D’Armement Maritime S.A. v. N.V.
Rotterdamsche Kolen Centrale VI-16
Note VI-20
R.G. McLean Ltd. v. Canadian Vickers Ltd. VI-21
Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors VI-24
Note VI-28
4. Unconscionability
Marshall v. Canada Permanent Trust Co. VI-30
Mundinger v. Mundinger VI-33
Lloyds Bank Limited v. Bundy VI-35
McKenzie v. Bank of Montreal VI-40
Macaulay v. A. Schroeder Music Publishing Co. Ltd. VI-47
Pridmore v. Calvert VI-49
Problem VI-52
5. Consumer Protection
Sale of Goods Act VI-53
Consumer Protection Act (Ont.) VI-54
Consumer Products Warranties Bill (Ont.) VI-56
Business Practices Act (Ont.) VI-60
The Unconscionable Transactions Relief Act (Ont.) VI-6 3
The Uniform Commercial Code (U.S.) s. 2-302 VI-64
Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1973 (U.K.) VI-6.4
Note VI-6.4
Problem VI-66
CHAPTER VII: PUBLIC POLICY
Egerton v. Brown low VII -1
Note VII-1
Gordon v. Ferguson VII -2
Pearce v. Brooks VII -5
Clark v. Hagar VII -8
Holman v. Johnson VII -8
Note VII-9
Comparative Law Note VII -9
Alexander v. Rayson VII-10
Note VII -13
Kingshot v. Brunskill VII-13
Question on Legal Method VII-14
Picbell Ltd. v. Pickford $ Black Ltd. VII-15
Questions on Legal Method VII- 17
St. John Shipping Corp. v. Joseph Rank, Ltd. VII -17
Archbolds (Freightage), Ltd. v. Spanglett, Ltd. VII -24
Ashmore, Benson, Pease Co. Ltd. v. A.V. Dawson Ltd. VI1-27
Kiriri Cotton Co. Ltd. v. Ranchhoddas Keshavji Dewani VI1-29
Mistry Amar Singh v. Serwano Wofunira Kuluby A. VI1-31
Risk, "Recent Developments in Contracts" VII-34
Dawson and Palmer, Cases on Restitution VII-34
Davidson £ Co. Ltd. v. McLeery VII-35
Problem VII -37
CHAPTER VIII: PERFORMANCE AND BREACH
Boone v. Eyre
Duke of St. Alban's v. Shore
Graves v. Legg
Kingston v. Preston
Rules of Practice
McDonald v. Murray
Cehave N.V. v. Bremer Handelgesellschaft m.b.H.
Panoutsos v. Raymond Hadley Corporation of New York
Turney and Turney v. Zhilka
Barnett v. Harrison
Dakin 5 Co. Limited v. Lee
Jacob ^ Youngs, Inc. v. Kent
Note
Restatement of the Law of Contracts s. 275
Questions
Bigham v. Brake
Sumpter v. Hedges
The Sale of Goods Act
Maple Flock Company, Ltd. v. Universal Furniture Products (Wembley), Ltd.
VI11-1
VIII-1
VI11-2
VI11-3
VIII-3
VI11 - 3
VI11-4
VI11-11
VI11-13
VI11 -14
VI11- 14
VI11- 15
VI11- 17
VI11-17
VI11-17
VI11-18
VI11-18
VI11-19
VI11-20
Bettini v. Gye VIII-22
Questions VIII-24
Poussard v. Spiers and Pond VII1-24
Questions VIII-26
Robinson v. Davison VIII-26
Note VIII-27
Cutter v. Powell VIII-27
Note VI11-28
Stubbs v. Holywell Railway Company VI11-28
The Apportionment Act VIII-28
CHAPTER IX: MISTAKE
1. Misrepresentations
Heilbut, Symons § Co. v. Buckleton IX-1
Questions IX-4
Note IX-4
Schawel v. Reade IX-4
Esso Petroleum Co. Ltd. v. Mardon IX-6
Redgrave v. Hurd IX-11
Newbigging v. Adam IX-13
Redican v. Nesbitt IX-14
Cole v. Pope IX-16
Mackenzie v. Royal Bank of Canada IX-17
O'Flaherty v. McKinley IX-18
Leaf v. International Galleries IX-20
Shanklin Pier Ltd. v. Detel Products Ltd. IX-21
Andrews v. Hopkinson IX-22
Misrepresentation Act 1967 (U.K.) IX-23
Note IX-24
Note on Advertising IX-24
Ranger v. Herbert A. Watts (Quebec) Ltd. IX-24
Combines Investigation Act (Can.) IX-25
Problem IX-25
2. Mistake as to Contractual Terms
Hobbs v. Esquimalt 8 Nanaimo Railway Company IX-26
Raffles v. Wichelhaus IX-28
Questions IX-28
Falck v. Williams IX-28
Henkel v. Pape IX-29
Dickson v. Reuter's Telegram Co. Ltd. IX-29
Questions IX-29
Smith v. H ughes IX-30
Bell v. Lever Brothers, Ltd. IX-32
Questions IX-32
London Country Council v. Henry Boot $ Sons Ltd. IX-32
A. Roberts £ Co. Ltd. v. Leicestershire County Council IX-33
Problems IX- 33
3. Mistake in Assumptions
Bell v. Lever Brothers, Ltd.
Solle v. Butcher
Note
Soctt v. Coulson
Hyrsky et al. v. Smith
Sherwood v. Walker
Magee v. Pennine Insurance Co.
Problem
CHAPTER X: UNEXPECTED CHANGES IN CIRCUMSTANCES
1• Relaxation of the Rule of Absolute Promises
Taylor v. Caldwell
Questions
Note
Paradine v. Jane
Capital Quality Homes Ltd. v. Colwyn Construction Ltd.
Howell v. Coupland
Question
Snipes Mountain Co. v. Benz Bros. § Co.
Parrish § ueimbecker Lt'4. v. Gooding Lumber
H.R. § S. Sainsbury Ltd. v. Street
Krell v. Henry
Heme Bay Steam Boat Co. v. Halton
Tsakiroglou $ Co. Ltd. v. Noblee Thorl G.M.B.H.
Davis Contractors Ltd. v. Fareham Urban District Council
2 • Relief on Terms: Restitution and Reliance
Appleby v. Myers
King v. Low
Goulding v. Rabinovitch
Fong v. Kerwin
Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjna v. Fairbaim Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd.
Note
Note on Restitution
The Frustrated Contracts Act
CHAPTER XI: THE STATUTE OF FRAUDS
The Statute of Frauds (Ont.)
The Sale of Goods Act
Historical Note
The Contracts Listed in the Statute
Note
Deglman v. Guaranty Trust Co. of Canada and Constantineau
Steadman v. Steadman
Statute of Frauds (B.C.)
IX-34
IX-38
IX-39
IX-39
IX-40
IX-44
IX-49
IX-50
X-l
X-3
X-3
X-4
X-5
X-12
X-l 3
X-14
X-15
X-l 7
X-22
X-25
X-25
X-28
X-30
X-32
X-32
X-32
X-32
X-37
X-37
X-39
XI-1
XI-1
XI-2
XI -2
XI-13
XI -13
XI -15
XI-22