miniature bioreactors for automated high-throughput bioprocess design

Upload: hwee-muzy

Post on 14-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Miniature Bioreactors for Automated High-throughput Bioprocess Design

    1/9

    Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. (2005) 42, 227235 (Printed in Great Britain) doi:10.1042/BA20040197 227

    Miniature bioreactors for automated high-throughputbioprocess design (HTBD): reproducibility of parallel fed-batchcultivations with Escherichia coli

    Robert Puskeiler*1, Andreas Kusterer*, Gernot T. John and Dirk Weuster-Botz*

    *Lehrstuhl f ur Bioverfahrenstechnik, Technische Universitat M unchen, Boltzmannstrasse 15, 85748 Garching, Germany, andPreSens GmbH, Regensburg, Germany

    To verify the reproducibility of cultivations of Escheri-

    chia coli in novel millilitre-scale bioreactors, fully auto-

    mated fed-batch cultivation was performed in seven

    parallel-operated ml-scale bioreactors with an initial

    volume of 10 ml/reactor. The process was automati-cally controlled by a liquid-handling system responsible

    for glucose feeding, titration and sampling. Atline ana-

    lysis (carried out externally of the reaction vessel with a

    short time delay) comprised automated pH and atten-

    uance measurements. The partial pressure of oxygen

    (pO2) was measured online by a novel fluorimetric sen-

    sor block measuring the fluorescence lifetime of fluoro-

    phors immobilized inside the millilitre-scale bio-

    reactors. Within a process time of 14.6 h, the parallel

    cultivation yielded a dry cell weight of 36.9+0.9 g l1.

    Atline pH measurements were characterized by an

    S.D. of

  • 7/29/2019 Miniature Bioreactors for Automated High-throughput Bioprocess Design

    2/9

    228 R. Puskeiler and others

    Table 1 Parameters used

    Parameter Definition Units

    cs Substrate concentration g l1

    DI Impeller diameter mD Attenuance at wavelength Unitless

    DCW Dry cell weight g l1

    DO Diss olved oxyge n concentr ation Air satur ation (%)

    kLa Ox yge n tr ansfer coefficient s1

    N Impeller speed s1

    NP Power number Unitless

    M Mass flux substrate g h1 l1

    OTR Oxygen transfer rate g h1 l1

    OUR Oxygen uptake rate g h1 l1

    P Power W

    pO2 Par tial pressure oxyge n Air satur ation (%)

    Liquid density kg m3

    wavelength of 600 nm was found. pH can be monitored by

    a solid-state pH-sensor chip mounted on the circuit board.The maximum reported attenuance, D, was 2.4 after a batch

    cultivation without pH control.

    A third approach is based on a magnetically driven gas-

    inducing impeller mounted in a baffled bioreactor with a re-

    action volume of 815 ml [13]. The design as a gas-inducing

    impeller does not require gas sparging in the reaction vol-

    ume, thus the individual control of gas inlet fluxes in the

    range of ml min1 is not necessary. The maximum kLa was

    characterized to be >0.4 s1. An automated fed-batch

    cultivation in such a millilitre-scale bioreactor reached a

    DCW of 20.5 g l1 in a mineral medium with glucose as the

    sole carbon source. The growth ofEscherichia coliwas shown

    to be equivalent to a reference cultivation in a laboratory-

    scale stirred-tank bioreactor with a working volume of

    3 litres [14].

    The present study is the first to report the application

    of the latter approach for the parallel cultivation of E. coli,

    aiming at the verification of the reproducibility of parallel

    cultivations. Therefore seven gas-inducing bioreactors at a

    millilitre scale are operated in parallel in a reaction block

    providing an electromagnetic drive and heat exchangers. The

    automation of titration, feeding and sampling is realized by

    a liquid-handling system. An integrated MTP reader enables

    automated pH and attenuance monitoring. The process is

    conducted with pH control in a fed-batch operation mode.Moreover, integrated fibre-optic sensors in the ml-scale bio-

    reactors allow the parallel monitoring of pO2 [partial pres-

    sure of oxygen (percentage air saturation)] with a frequency

    of six data points/min per reactor. The parameters used in

    this paper are defined in Table 1.

    Materials and methods

    The millilitre-scale bioreactors

    The baffled bioreactors with a nominal volume of 815 ml

    were produced from polystyrene by die casting (H+ P

    Figure 1 Cross-section of a bioreactor mounted in the reaction block

    The lower part of the reaction block is equipped with the magnetic drive and

    heat exchangers to control the reaction temperature. The upper part of the

    reaction block contains heat exchangers to enable cooling of the headspace of

    the bioreactors thus limiting ev aporation. The sterile barrier provides the gas

    inlet andthe gasoutlet, whichsimultaneouslyservesas sampling port.The shafts

    on which the impellers rotate freely are screwed into the sterile barrier.

    Labortechnik, Oberschleissheim, Germany). The gas-

    inducing impellers were machined from polyether ether

    ketone (PEEK) by a CNC (Computer Numerical Control)

    milling machine (H+ P Labortechnik). The impellers are

    equipped with samarium/cobalt (SmCo) permanent magnets

    (Fehrenkemper Magnetsysteme, Lauenau, Germany). A

    cross-section of one bioreactor mounted in the reaction

    block is depicted in Figure 1. The dimensions of the bio-reactor, the shaft and the gas-inducing impeller are detailed

    in Figure 2.

    Reaction block

    The reaction block (dimensions: lengthwidth height,

    310 mm 240 mm 140 mm) fits a maximum of 48 bio-

    reactors. The reaction block is equipped with the magnetic

    drive, heat exchangers and a sterile barrier providing the

    gas inlet and the gas outlet, which simultaneously serves

    as sampling port. The shafts are screwed into the sterile

    barrier. The gas-inducing impeller rotates freely on the shaft.

    Maximum impeller speed can be set to 4000 rev./min, cor-responding to 66.6 Hz.

    CFD (computational fluid dynamics) simulation of

    hydrodynamics in the millilitre-scale bioreactor

    The commercial CFD software package CFX-5.7 (Ansys,

    Otterfing, Germany) was used for the modelling of the

    hydrodynamics of the millilitre-scale bioreactor filled to a

    liquid height of 40.5 mm corresponding to a liquid volume

    of 11.2 ml. The code is based on the finite volume technique.

    The reactor volume is resolved with a total number of

    170000 hybrid grid control volumes. For each of these

    C 2005 Portland Press Ltd

  • 7/29/2019 Miniature Bioreactors for Automated High-throughput Bioprocess Design

    3/9

    Reproducibility in miniature bioreactors 229

    Figure 2 Major dimensions of the ml-scale bioreactor, the shaft and the

    gas-inducing impeller as they are mounted inside the reaction block

    All the dimensions shown are in mm.

    volumes, a full set of transport equations for mass andmomentum is solved in a steady-state model approach. To

    represent the rotating parts of the reactor, the multiple

    reference frame technique is used with a rotating inner

    stirrer volume and a stationary outer vessel volume. Turbu-

    lence effects in the fluid flow are prescribed using the SST

    (shear-stress-transport) model. The simulation is performed

    in a single-phase status using the fluid properties of water at

    ambient temperature.

    Organism and medium

    The strain used for cultivation was E. coli K12 (DSM 498),

    purchased from the German Collection of Micro-organismsand Cell Cultures (Braunschweig, Germany).

    Seed cultures and bioreactor cultivation of E. coliwere

    carried out in a defined mineral medium of the following

    composition (adapted from [15]): glucose (15 g l1),

    KH2PO4 (13.3 g l1), (NH4)2HPO4 (4.0 g l

    1), MgSO4

    7H2O (1.2 g l1), CoCl2 6H2O (2.5 mg l

    1), MnCl2 4H2O

    (15 mg l1), CuCl2 2H2O (1.5 mg l1), H3BO3 (3.0 mg l

    1),

    Na2MoO4 2H2O (2.5 mg l1) and zinc acetate dihydrate

    (13 mg l1), citric acid monohydrate (1.86 g l1), EDTA

    (8.4 mg l1), ferric citrate (12.5 mg l1) and thiamine hydro-

    chloride (4.5 mg l1). As the antifoam agent, CLEROL 265

    (0.1 ml l1; Cognis, Dusseldorf, Germany) was used.

    Feeding solution for fed-batch cultivation contained

    glucose (475 g l1), MgSO4 7H2O (20 g l1), EDTA

    (13.0 mg l1), CoCl2 6H2O (4.15 mg l1), MnCl2

    4H2O (24.9 mg l1), CuCl2 2H2O (2.5 mg l1), H3BO3(5.0 mg l1), Na2MoO4 2H2O (4.15 mg1 l

    1), zinc acetate

    dihydrate (21.7 mg l1) and ferric citrate (47.6 mg l1).

    Seed culture

    The 50 ml seed culture in a 500 ml unbaffled shake flask was

    inoculated with 0.067% of a frozen E. coli cell stock and

    incubated at 37C with shaking at 200 min1 for 16 h (Multi-

    tron; Infors, Bottmingen, Switzerland) until a DCUV650 of 3.0

    (Genesys20; Thermo Electron, Dreieich, Germany) was

    reached.

    Millilitre-scale bioreactor cultureThe millilitre-scale bioreactors were inoculated with 100 %

    seed culture corresponding to an initial DCUV650 (attenuance

    in the cuvette photometer at 650 nm) of 3.0. The initial

    reaction volume was 10 ml. Stirrer speed was initially set

    to 2000 min1. The gas flow through the sterile gas cover

    consisted of oxygen-enriched air. The volumetric fluxes of air

    and oxygen were controlled by thermal mass flow control-

    lers (Brooks Instruments, Veenendaal, The Netherlands).

    Total gas flow was initially set to 4.8 litres min1 air cor-

    responding to 0.1 litre/min per reactor. During batch cul-

    tivation, the stirrer speed was manually increased to main-

    tain pO2 >20 % air saturation. During fed-batch culture, the

    volumetric fraction of oxygen was additionally increased up

    to a total oxygen concentration of 50% in the inlet gas

    flow. pH was automatically controlled at 6.8 by intermittent

    addition of 12.5 % (v/v) NH4OH.

    Pipetting precision

    The pipetting precision of the liquid handler was verified

    gravimetrically for the pipetting of feed solution, with a

    volume of 18.7 l corresponding to the highest feed flow of

    13.3 g h1 l1. The density of the feed solution was gravi-

    metrically determined to be 1.19 g cm3. The test com-

    prised ten pipetting steps per pipette tip. The deviation of

    the tips from the desired pipetting volume was taken intoaccount for the subsequent pipetting test.

    Monitoring of cell growth

    Cell growth was automatically monitored atline in MTPs by

    measuring the attenuance, DMTP650 (microtitre-plate attenu-

    ance at 650 nm), at a wavelength of 650 nm. Samples of

    10 l were automatically diluted to 1:20 with PBS (8 g l1

    NaCl, 0.2 g l1 KCl, 1.44 g l1 Na2HPO4 and 0.24 g

    l1 KH2PO4, pH 7.4) by the internal pumps of the MTP

    reader. DCW was estimated from DMTP650 with a second-

    order polynomial function allowing a measuring range of

    C 2005 Portland Press Ltd

  • 7/29/2019 Miniature Bioreactors for Automated High-throughput Bioprocess Design

    4/9

    230 R. Puskeiler and others

    undiluted samples between 0.16 and 1.74 DMTP650 units with

    a mean CV (coefficient of variance), R2, of 0.995. Taking the

    dilution factor into account, the resulting DCW measuring

    range is 3.248.0 g l1.

    Reference attenuance measurements (DCUV650) werecarried out up to a process time of 8.77 h, i.e. the pre-

    sence of the experimenter. A single beam photometer

    (Genesys20) with plastic cuvettes of 1 ml volume was used.

    Measurements were carried out at a wavelength of 650 nm.

    Monitoring of pH

    Commercially available MTPs containing pH-sensitive sensor

    spots (Hydroplate; Presens, Regensburg, Germany) were ap-

    plied for automated atline pH measurements in an MTP

    reader (Fluostar Galaxy; bmg labtech, Offenburg, Germany).

    The hydroplates were calibrated with cultivation medium

    adjusted to six different pH values covering the measuringrange between pH 4 and 9.

    Monitoring of DO

    DO was monitored online with fluorimetric sensor spots

    (Presens) immobilized on to the reactor bottom with the sili-

    cone rubber compound 692542 (RS Components, Corby,

    U.K.). The fluorescence decay time of the fluorophors was

    measured with a prototype fluorescence reader (Presens)

    containing eight separate light sources and photodiodes

    integrated into a sensor block fitting beneath the reaction

    block. Measurements were performed with a frequency of

    six data points/min per reactor.

    Process control

    All sampling and feeding steps as well as the MTP move-

    ments were programmed with the liquid-handler control

    software (Gemini; Tecan, Crailsheim, Germany). Sampling

    of 50 l h1 was carried out by a liquid-handling system

    (RSP 150; Tecan) with a frequency of 1 h1 during batch

    growth. An additional sample was taken 30 min after the

    initial glucose was metabolized. During fed-batch growth,

    samples were taken each time the mass flow of feed sol-

    ution was increased. From the process time of 6.9 h until

    the end of the cultivation, samples were taken with a fre-

    quency of 2 h

    1. The samples were pipetted into an MTPand then transported to the plate reader (Fluostar Galaxy)

    that measured pH in undiluted samples and attenuance

    DMTP650 in 1:20 diluted samples. Communication with the

    MTP reader was programmed in LabView (version 6.1;

    National Instruments, Munich, Germany). LabView VIs

    (virtual instruments) were started from the command line

    in the liquid-handler control software. Closed loop control

    for pH was achieved by extracting pH values from the MTP

    reader data files, processing them in LabView and creating

    pipetting instructions for the liquid-handler control software

    that were regularly loaded into the control program. pH

    was controlled at 6.8 with a simple proportional controller

    calculating the required amount of base for any single reactor

    by applying a titration curve that was created in advance.

    No addition of acid was implemented into the pH-control

    algorithm. During fed-batch growth, the titration agent wasadded with a frequency of 3 h1. After each sampling step, the

    pH controller increased the base mass flow proportionally

    according to the measured pH deviation from the set

    point. After atline measurements, the diluted samples were

    recovered for manual attenuance measurements in a single

    beam cuvette photometer (DCUV650). The MTP was cleaned

    in an MTP washer and re-used to receive the subsequent

    samples. After 8 h of process time, a new hydroplate was

    used to maintain high reproducibility of pH measurements.

    After the consumption of the initial glucose at a pro-

    cess time of 4.9 h, feeding was started intermittently with a

    frequency of 15 h1

    corresponding to a feeding interval of4 min. After 40 and 90 min, the initial feed flow of 4.0 g

    h1 l1 was increased to 7.5 and 13.3 g l1 h1 respect-

    ively. Hence, the highest feeding volume was 18.7 l for

    each pipetting step.

    Results and discussion

    Hydrodynamics of the millilitre-scale bioreactor

    Figure 3 shows the results of the single-phase CFD simul-

    ations at an impeller speed of 2800 rev./min. Owing to the

    rotational movement, the liquid phase is accelerated along

    the diagonal outward pumping channels, thereby reaching a

    top speed of>2.0 m s1. The strong radial flow induced

    by the impeller leads to a circulating flow field above and

    below the impeller comparable with the flow field of a single

    Rushton turbine. As a result of the acceleration of the liquid

    phase in the diagonal channels, a constant negative pressure

    builds up in the vertical bottom channel of the impeller as

    shown in the spatial distribution of the simulated pressure in

    the liquid phase. The peak negative pressure (2000 Pa) is localized in the zone where the

    outward pumped liquid encounters the baffles. The zones

    of highest positive or negative pressure correspond to the

    zones of highest energy dissipation. Since the integral of

    the simulated energy dissipation over the liquid volume

    generally underestimates the power input [16], this variable

    was calculated by solving the momentum balance of the flow

    field. This approach yields a mean power input of 21.9 W l1

    for the millilitre-scale bioreactor at 2800 min1. The single-

    phase power number NP = 3.7 is obtained by assuming a

    C 2005 Portland Press Ltd

  • 7/29/2019 Miniature Bioreactors for Automated High-throughput Bioprocess Design

    5/9

    Reproducibility in miniature bioreactors 231

    Figure 3 Results of single-phase CFD simulations of axially projected liquid speed and pressure in the millilitre-scale bioreactor for an impeller speed of

    2800 rev./min

    The liquid speed is represented in a vertical cross-section through the centre of the bioreactor. The pressure distribution is represented in a vertical cross-section

    lying 0.7 mm in front of the centre of the bioreactor in order to display the difference between positive pressure in front of the baffles (right) and negative pressure

    behind the baffles (left).

    liquid density of= 998 kg m3 in the equation:

    Np = P/ N3 D

    5

    I

    Parallel fed-batch cultivation

    After three optimization cycles, the accuracy of the eight

    pipette tips of the liquid-handler was increased from the

    initial value of 87.3 to 99.9 % with a precision of 3.0 % of 10

    subsequent pipetting steps. Optimization was carried out

    for a volume of 18.7 l of feed solution (results not shown)

    corresponding to the glucose mass flow of 13.3 g h1 l1.

    Results of parallel cultivation are shown in Figures 4, 6

    and 8. During batch growth, a maximum mean growth rate

    () of 0.49+ 0.06 h1 was reached in the seven, millilitre-

    scale, bioreactors. The initial glucose concentration of15 g l1 led to a final DCW of 7.2+ 0.5 g l

    1 corres-

    ponding to a biomass yield (YXS) of 0.48+ 0.03 g g1. The

    DCW estimations based on measurements in the MTP

    reader were characterized by a decreasing CV (Figure 5A).

    The initially high CV of more than 10 % of the data from the

    MTP reader is a result of the values corresponding to

    the lower range of the preliminarily determined measure-

    ment range. The CVs of DCW estimations derived from

    DCUV650 measurements in the single-beam photometer are

    comparable with the CVs of measurements in the MTP

    reader at process times above 3 h (Figure 5B). Owing to

    intermittent pH control with a frequency of 1 h1, pH

    decreases to the value plotted in Figure 6 before the titration

    agent is added. During batch growth, the reduction in pH/h

    increases due to the increase in cell concentration. As a

    result of acetate metabolism at the end of batch growth, pH

    increases above the set point of 6.8 and reaches 7.05+ 0.05

    at a process time of 4.8 h. During batch growth, a mean total

    base volume (VBase) of 271+ 7 l was added to the cultures.

    pO2 during batch growth was manually controlled at 20%

    by increasing the impeller speed. After glucose depletion,

    indicated by a sharp increase in pO2 at a process time of

    3.76+ 0.04 h, the main metabolic by-product acetate was

    consumed by the cells.

    At the beginning of fed-batch operation, the glucose

    mass flow was gradually increased in two steps to accom-modate the culture to intermittent feeding. At the end of

    the process, a mean DCW of 36.9+ 0.9 g l1 was reached

    in the seven bioreactors (Figure 4). During fed-batch growth,

    the pH oscillated between 6.85 and 6.36 in all seven reactors

    due to the intermittent pH control with a frequency of 3 h1

    (Figure 6). In all samples taken during fed-batch growth, the

    CV of pH did not exceed 1.1 % (Figure 7). The mean total

    base volume added was 553.6+ 31.6 l.

    From the beginning of fed-batch cultivation, pO2oscillates, owing to the intermittent feeding (Figure 8). After

    the addition of glucose to the culture, pO2 decreases as a

    C 2005 Portland Press Ltd

  • 7/29/2019 Miniature Bioreactors for Automated High-throughput Bioprocess Design

    6/9

    232 R. Puskeiler and others

    Figure 4 Parallel, automated, fed-batch cultivation ofE. coli K12 in seven,millilitre-scale, bioreactors in a mineral medium with glucose as the sole

    carbon source

    After exponential batch growth, a linear, stepwise increasing feeding profile

    was started. Time course of DCW, substrate concentration (cS ; g l1) and

    substrate mass flow (MS) are shown. Top to bottom: Reactors numbers 17.

    Figure 5 Coefficient of variation of DCW measurements in the seven,

    millilitre-scale, bioreactors

    (A) CV of DCW atline measurements of the seven, millilitre-scale, bioreactors

    in the MTP reader (DMTP650). (B) CV of DCW offline measurements of the

    seven ml-bioreactors in the single-beam photometer (DCUV650).

    result of the higher OUR (oxygen uptake rate; g l1 h1)

    of the culture. After glucose depletion, pO2 increases to

    its initial value. At the maximum glucose mass flow of

    13.3 g h1 l1, a single glucose pulse results in a transitional

    glucose concentration of 0.89 g l1. Although this value is

    higher than the critical concentration of acetate formation

    of 0.03 g l1 reported for E. coli [17], the culture is able

    to metabolize the by-product during the feeding interval of

    4 min, since no accumulation of acetate could be measured

    until the end of the process.

    After 14.6 h, the process started running into oxy-

    gen limitation while the stirrer speed and volumetric oxygen

    fraction in the inlet gas were kept constant. Assuming

    (i) constant kLa by neglecting composition changes in theculture medium and (ii) negative influence of increase in

    cell concentration, constant stirrer speed and volumetric

    oxygen fraction in the gas inlet flow, guarantees a constant

    OTR. Nevertheless, during intermittent feeding, the time

    required to metabolize the added glucose decreases as

    the cell concentration increases with ongoing process time

    (Figure 9). The transitional decrease in pO2 concentration

    after glucose addition is sharper and may thus lead to

    transitional oxygen limitation at higher cell densities.

    Monitoring pO2 enables the estimation of the OUR of

    the culture. With an estimated kLa of 0.22 s1 of the impeller

    C 2005 Portland Press Ltd

  • 7/29/2019 Miniature Bioreactors for Automated High-throughput Bioprocess Design

    7/9

    Reproducibility in miniature bioreactors 233

    Figure 6 Parallel, automated, fed-batch cultivation ofE. coli K12 in seven,millilitre-scale bioreactors in a mineral medium with glucose as the sole

    carbon source

    Figure 7 CV of pH atline measurements of the seven, millilitre-scale,

    bioreactors in the MTP reader with hydroplates

    at 2600 rev./min [18] and a calculated oxygen solubility of

    6.09 mg l1 for air saturation at 37C in the mineral medium

    [19], the OUR profile depicted in Figure 10(A) can be

    derived. During the constant feeding with a glucose mass

    flow of 13.3 g l1 h1, the mean OUR gradually increases

    from approx. 4 g l1 h1 to almost 6 g l1 h1. An increase

    in oxygen uptake during constant feeding is a result of the

    increase in maintenance of oxygen demand compared with

    the oxygen demand due to growth. The lowest pO2 during a

    feeding interval represents a maximum OUR of the culture.

    Owing to the intermittent feeding profile, the maximum

    OUR is more than 2-fold higher than the mean OUR of the

    culture (Figure 10B).

    Without taking the highest CV of the first three

    DCW measurements in the MTP reader into account, the

    overall mean CV is 4.4%. During 14.6 h, a mean DCW of36.9+ 0.9 g l

    1 was reached. All relevant process data are

    summarized in Table 2.

    Since one of the major aims of bioprocess development

    is the maximization of cell concentration per process time,

    we compared the data reported here with the results of

    Korz et al. [20], who developed a high-cell-density cultivation

    process for E. coliby applying an exponential feeding profile.

    Korz et al. reported an E. coli TG1 cell density of 35 g l1

    biomass concentration after 22 h of exponential feeding

    in a mineral medium. However, they started with a lower

    inoculum density of approx. 0.1 g l1 resulting in a longer

    batch phase of 12 h. Presuming an equal inoculum density ofapprox. 1.3 g l1 as in the present study, Korz et al. reached

    their DCW of 35 g l1 after approx. 15 h, a time span

    comparable with the process time in the present study. The

    applied linear feeding strategy was thus able to compete

    with the high cell density culture developed by Korz

    et al [20].

    Time course of pH as measured and controlled intermittently. For details on

    titration frequencies, see the Process control subsection of the Materials and

    methods section. Top to bottom: reactors numbers 17.

    C 2005 Portland Press Ltd

  • 7/29/2019 Miniature Bioreactors for Automated High-throughput Bioprocess Design

    8/9

    234 R. Puskeiler and others

    Figure 8 Parallel, automated, fed-batch cultivation ofE. coli K12 in seven,millilitre-scale, bioreactors in a mineral medium with glucose as the sole

    carbon source

    Figure 9 Plot ofpO2

    versus time during one feeding interval of 4 min for

    three different process times and thus cell concentrations

    Zero time corresponds to a feeding step at the feed mass flow

    of 13.3 g l1 h1 . , tP (process time)=8.6 h (DCW=21.3 g l1); ,

    tP =10.2 h (DCW=26.6 g l1); , tP =14.1 h (DCW=35.8 g l

    1). For

    clarity, broken lines have been added.

    Table 2 Summary of mean process parameters of fed-batch cultivation in

    seven, millilitre-scale, bioreactors

    Process phase Parameter Mean value S.D. CV (%)

    Batch DCW (g l1) 7.18 0.46 6.5

    (h1

    ) 0.49 0.06 12.3YXS (g g

    1) 0.48 0.03 6.5

    pH 7.05 0.05 0.7

    VBase (l) 271.2 7.0 2.6

    pO2 increase 3.76 0.04 1.1

    Fed-batch DCW (g l1) 36.87 0.91 2.5

    VBase (l) 553.6 31.6 5.7

    Time course of impeller speed, oxygen fraction in the inlet gas flow and pO2 .

    Top to bottom: reactors numbers 17. Impeller [min1] means impeller speed

    in rev./min.

    C 2005 Portland Press Ltd

  • 7/29/2019 Miniature Bioreactors for Automated High-throughput Bioprocess Design

    9/9

    Reproducibility in miniature bioreactors 235

    Figure 10 OUR in the seven ml-bioreactors

    (A) Comparison of maximum OUR () with mean OUR (). Estimation

    is based on a kLa of 0.22 s1 and an oxygen solubility of 6.09 mg l1 at air

    saturation. (B) The ratio of maximum OUR to mean OUR during intermittent

    feeding.

    The higher maximum oxygen demand of a microbialculture during intermittent feeding could be satisfied by

    the millilitre-scale bioreactors at an oxygen concentration

    of 50% in the inlet gas flow. Our future work will focus

    on the establishment of a closed-loop control of impeller

    speed and oxygen concentration in the inlet gas flow, to

    enable further prolongation of process times and thus

    maximization of DCW. Moreover, the process control

    software currently adapted is capable of controlling 48

    bioreactors simultaneously.

    Acknowledgments

    We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of D. Ortlieb

    (CFD Consultants, Rottenburg, Germany) in modelling the

    hydrodynamics of the millilitre-scale bioreactor and the ex-

    cellent technical assistance of M. Amann. This work

    was partially supported by the Deutsche Bundesstiftung

    Umwelt.

    References

    1 Elmahdi, I., Baganz, F., Dixon, K., Harrop, T., Sugden, D. and

    Lye, G. J. (2003) Biochem. Eng. J. 16, 299310

    2 Lye, G. J., Ayazi-Shamlou, P., Baganz, F., Dalby, P. A. and

    Woodley, J. M. (2003) Trends Biotechnol. 21, 2937

    3 Maharbiz, M. M., Holtz, W. J., Howe, R. T. and Keasling, J. D.

    (2004) Biotechnol. Bioeng. 85, 376381

    4 Weuster-Botz, D., Stevens, S. and Hawrylenko, A. (2002)

    Biochem. Eng. J. 11, 6972

    5 Duetz, W. A., Ruedi, L., Hermann, R., OConnor, K.,

    Buchs, J. and Witholt, B. (2000) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66,

    26412646

    6 Her mann, R., Lehmann, M. and Buchs, J. (2003)

    Biotechnol. Bioeng. 81, 178186

    7 Maier, U., Losen, M. and Buchs, J. (2004) Biochem. Eng. J. 17,

    1551678 Buchs, J., Maier, U., Milbradt, C. and Zoels, B. (2000)

    Biotechnol. Bioeng. 68, 589593

    9 Weuster-Botz, D., Altenbach-Rehm, J. and Arnold, M. (2001)

    Biochem. Eng. J. 7, 163170

    10 Dilsen, S., Paul, W., Herforth, D. , Sandgathe, A.,

    Altenbach-Rehm, J., Freudl, R., Wandrey, C . and Weuster-Botz,

    D. (2001) J. Biotechnol. 88, 7784

    11 Lamping, S. R., Zhang, H., Allen, B. and Shamlou, P. A. (2003)

    Chem. Eng. Sci. 58, 747758

    12 Weis, S., John, G. T., Klimant, I. and Heinzle, E. (2002)

    Biotechnol. Prog. 18, 821830

    13 Puskeiler, R., Zacher, H. K. and Weuster-Botz, D. (2003)

    Eur. Pat. Appl. PCT EP03/14752

    14 Puskeiler, R., Kaufmann, K. and Weuster-Botz, D. (2004)

    Biotechnol. Bioeng. 89, 512523

    15 Riesenberg, D., Schulz, V., Knorre, W. A., Pohl, H. D., Korz,

    D., Sanders, E. A., Ross, A. and Deckwer, W. D. (1991)

    J. Biotechnol. 20, 1728

    16 Gentric, C., Mignon, D., Bousquet, J. and Tanguy, P. A. (2005)

    Chem. Eng. Sci. 60, 22532272

    17 Vrabel, P., van der Lans, R. G. J. M., van der Schot, F. N., Luyben,

    K. C. A. M., Xu, B. and Enfors, S. O. (2001) Chem. Eng. J. 84,

    463474

    18 Puskeiler, R. (2004) Ph.D. Thesis, Munich University of

    Technology19 Schumpe, A. (1993) Chem. Eng. Sci. 48, 153158

    20 Korz, D. J., Rinas, U., Hellmuth, K., Sanders, E. A. and Deckwer,

    W. D. (1995) J. Biotechnol. 39, 5965

    Received 9 December 2004/15 April 2005; accepted 26 April 2005

    Published as Immediate Publication 26 April 2005, doi:10.1042/BA20040197

    C 2005 Portland Press Ltd