ministry of agriculture and forestry m m ainstreaming of leader+ and innovation – the finnish...
TRANSCRIPT
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
MMainstreaming of LEADER+ and Innovation – The finnish experience
ainstreaming of LEADER+ and Innovation – The finnish experience
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
LLocal Action Groups 2000-2006ocal Action Groups 2000-2006
LEADER method has been fully mainstreamed into 3 other programmes than just LEADER+ (the only excample of full mainstreaming in EU)
58 LAGs covering 419 municipalities out of 444 (centres of larger cities and a few small cities remain outside)
25 LEADER+ groups (LEADER+ Programme)
19,5 LAGs financed from Regional Rural Development Programme
6,5 LAGs financed from Objective 1 Programme
7 LAGs with POMO+ national financing
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
LLocal Action Groups 2000-2006ocal Action Groups 2000-2006
almost 5.000 projects have already sprung up
total number of projects will probably be around 7.000
during the entire functioning period approximately 220 million euros of public funding and 120 million euros of private funding will be used for projects established through LAG work
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
LLocal Action Groups in Finland
ocal Action Groups in Finland
LEADER+ -action groupLEADER+ -action group
POMO+ - action groupPOMO+ - action group
ALMA - action groupALMA - action group
Objective 1, Northern Finland Objective 1, Northern Finland - action group - action group
Objective 1, Eastern Finland Objective 1, Eastern Finland - action group- action group
Border of Objective 1 -Programme
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
LLEADER features in all LAGsEADER features in all LAGsarea-based approach
bottom-up approach
local partnership
innovation
multi-sectoral intergration
inter-territorial co-operation (incl. transnational co-operation)
networking
decentralised management and financing
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
7 municipalities / LAG area
41 000 inhabitants / LAG area
1,8 people working in a LAG
founding 6 Meuros (until 2006) / LAG
LLocal Action Group in Finland approximatelyocal Action Group in Finland approximately
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
Members in the board of the LAG:1/3 representatives of municipalities1/3 local associations and enterprises1/3 rural inhabitants
National public financing:Municipalities of the LAG area must cover 20 % of total public financing
National Network Unit financed nationally and serves all local action groups
CCommon features for all LAGs in Finlandommon features for all LAGs in Finland
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
local people, enterprises, farms and residents
Local Action GroupLocal Action GroupBoard
1/3 representatives of municipalities1/3 local associations and enterprises
1/3 rural inhabitants
ProjectProject
Project
munici-palities
ProjectProject
Project
staff
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
AAdministrative model dministrative model
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
FFinancing model inancing model
MUNICI-PALITIES
LOCAL ACTION GROUP LAG
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
NE
TW
OR
K U
NIT
municipal project funding
RURAL DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CENTRE
PROJECT nprivate funding
National funding
project- and administrative funding (EU and State)
project funds (EU and State)
administrative funding (EU and State)
project- and administrative funding (municipalities)
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
strategic choice made at top policy level and translated down to lower ranks of the administration
necessary cross-coordination with other relevant authorities at horizontal level (Rural Policy Committee)
local people very interested in LEADER activities
regional broadening and deepening of LAG work was supported by national rural policy
HHow was the LAG work mainstreamed in Finland? How has the national rural policy been supporting LAG work?
ow was the LAG work mainstreamed in Finland? How has the national rural policy been supporting LAG work?
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
autumn 1995: writing of the 2nd Rural Policy Programme - drafters made a suggestion to distribute LEADER method nationally
the rural policy report presented by the Government to the Parliament included statement ”Local Action Group work should be broadened to cover all areas of Finland” 1996 and 1998
proposal was one of the most important issues in the Rural Policy Programme drafted by an expert committee appointed by the Government
DDescription of the process of mainstreaming LEADERescription of the process of mainstreaming LEADER
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
Rural Policy Committee (YTR) had political backing for trying to find national funding for new LAGs -> acchieved -> funding from Agricultural Development Fund for POMO groups (guidelines 1997)
22 LEADERII and 26 POMO LAGs working 1997-1999, planning of the future
LEADER+ became only a bit bigger for 2000 - 2006 -> needed other funding for the good work to be mainstreamed
autumn 2000 (after Finland sent the L+ programme to the Commission) General Secretary of the Rural Policy Committee started negotiating with 12 regions about funding for LAG work
DDescription of the process of mainstreaming LEADERescription of the process of mainstreaming LEADER
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
the negotiating position was strengthened by the situation where the final selection of LEADER+ groups was not yet completed
General Secretary presented the issue for the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry -> funding for 26 LAGs in either ALMA or Objective 1
Process involved a big risk that regions would start lobbying to get more LEADER+ groups - list of L+ LAGs held until the end
7 LAGs was still out of funding and the Ministry wanted to use Agricultural Development Fund specifically for agricultural funding
DDescription of the process of mainstreaming LEADERescription of the process of mainstreaming LEADER
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
LAGs took their concerns to the members of the Parliament -> question to the Government ”How will the Government act to enable all areas to be covered under the LAG work, as was promised in defenitions of the policy?”
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry had to consent, since the Agricultural Development Fund was the only possibility for funding seven LAGs
whole country became covered with LAGs for 2000 - 2006
idea of mainstreaming autumn 1995 - goals attchieved autumn 2002
DDescription of the process of mainstreaming LEADERescription of the process of mainstreaming LEADER
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
Cross-administratorial rural policy need an organ, which constantly develops the rural policy system as a network in central administration as well as the regional and local levels
Risks have to be taken to achieve results
Although the main direction and power of LAG work moves upwards, the crucial beginnings must be brought about from a higher level downwards
WWhat can we learn from this?hat can we learn from this?
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
Rural policy needs contact persons who will watch the progress of whole projects, preferably on all levels of action
Activities must be considered and planned sufficiently long into the future, for example the negotiations carried out at the turn of 2000 and 2001 were aimed for both the periods 2000-2006 and 2007-2013
LAG work functions well for local people and is close to them
WWhat can we learn from this?hat can we learn from this?
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
LAGs are essential part of Finland´s entire rural policy
LAG work will continue during the period 2007-2013 in the entire Finland
An increase in the amount of social tasks for the groups has taken place of regional mainstreaming
Goal for LAG work is to remain stable and grow stronger in the whole country
WWhat does the future look like in Finland?hat does the future look like in Finland?
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
innovation of the Rural Policy Committee in the mainstreaming
someone has to make moves in getting new ways of doing spread -> this will not happen just bottom-up, you need also top-down
LAGs have to start new processes and ways of doing also by themselves
innovation can be just something slightly different from the old and can still have strong influences
IInnovation in the rural development programmesnnovation in the rural development programmes
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
tripartition in the boards of finnish LAGs has been innovative and is really important, as it keeps the work of the group on the wide base
there has to be rules of administration and they have to be controlled and secured (Work Group for the LAGs in Finland, under Rural Policy Committee)
IInnovation in the rural development programmesnnovation in the rural development programmes
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
there should not be strict rules for appropriate funding and eligibility for experimentation and innovation or strict requirements for innovation
when people get freedom for innovating and the financing bodies use consideration and take some risks, the activity and development potential will rise
result: local people stay very interested in developing their rural areas
IInnovation requirements in the rural development programmesnnovation requirements in the rural development programmes
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
MMore information about LAG work and Rural Policy in Finland ore information about LAG work and Rural Policy in Finland
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, www.mmm.fi Mainstreaming, Mr. Eero Uusitalo, [email protected]
Rural Policy Committee, www.maaseutupolitiikka.fiSecretary-General, Rural Counsellor Mr Eero Uusitalo, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Mobile +358-40-541 9916, [email protected] Secretary-General, Senior Officer Mr Risto Matti Niemi, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Mobile +358- 50-599 5229, [email protected] of the Project Group, Senior Officer Mrs Johanna Heikkilä, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Tel. +358-9-160 52506, [email protected] Secretary, Senior Officer Mrs Marjatta Koskinen, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Tel. +358- 9-160 53348, [email protected], Departmental Secretary Mrs Maarit Skogberg, Ministry of the Interior, Tel. +358-9-160 44592, [email protected]
Rural Development Expert Mrs Tytti Siltanen, Mobile +358- 50-597 5551, [email protected]
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, www.mmm.fi Mainstreaming, Mr. Eero Uusitalo, [email protected]
Rural Policy Committee, www.maaseutupolitiikka.fiSecretary-General, Rural Counsellor Mr Eero Uusitalo, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Mobile +358-40-541 9916, [email protected] Secretary-General, Senior Officer Mr Risto Matti Niemi, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Mobile +358- 50-599 5229, [email protected] of the Project Group, Senior Officer Mrs Johanna Heikkilä, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Tel. +358-9-160 52506, [email protected] Secretary, Senior Officer Mrs Marjatta Koskinen, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Tel. +358- 9-160 53348, [email protected], Departmental Secretary Mrs Maarit Skogberg, Ministry of the Interior, Tel. +358-9-160 44592, [email protected]
Rural Development Expert Mrs Tytti Siltanen, Mobile +358- 50-597 5551, [email protected]