minor new source review permit application · minor new source review permit application mckesson...

Minor New Source Review Permit Application

MCKESSON CORPORATION

Chapparal Commerce Center Salt River Pima–Maricopa Indian Community

Scottsdale, Arizona September 11, 2017

Terracon Project No. 65177250

Prepared for: McKesson Corporation

Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc.

MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA

0 Environmental • Facilities • Geotechnical • Materials

September 11, 2017

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

Attn: Ms. Lisa Beckham P: 415-972-3811 E: [email protected]

Re: Minor New Source Review Permit Application McKesson Corporation Chaparral Commerce Center Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Scottsdale, Arizona Terracon Project No. 65177250

Dear Ms. Beckham:

Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) has prepared the attached minor New Source Review (NSR) Permit application for the two emergency diesel-fired generators (1,500 kW each) to be installed at the Chaparral Commerce Center in the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community (SRPMIC) in Scottsdale, Arizona.

Since the site is located within the SRPMIC, the permitting authority is the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Since the generators are over the size allowed by the General Air Quality Permit the facility is submitted the enclosed Minor Source NSR permit application.

A copy of the signed application is being emailed to the USEPA, however a hard copy of the application will also be mailed. Due to a compressed construction schedule, we are respectfully

Terracon Consultants, Inc. 13400 15th Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55441

P 763-489-3100 F 763-489-3101 terracon.com

Minor NSR Air Quality Permit Application llerracanMcKesson Corporation • Scottsdale, Arizona September 11, 2017 • Terracon Project No. 65177250

requesting that the USEPA expedite the review of this application. We appreciate your assistance with this matter.

If you have any questions on the permit application please contact me at (763) 489-3158.

Sincerely, Terracon Co

WCJ David C. Reynold Mark S. Miller Senior Engineer - Environmental National Account Manager

Enc. Minor NSR Permit Application

Cc: Jon Blaha, Ryan Companies US, Inc. Angela Schurz, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community

Responsive • Resourceful Reliable 2

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Minor New Source Review Permit Application Forms Appendix B: Potential To Emit Calculations Appendix C: Threatened or Endangered Species Report Appendix D: SRPMIC Environmental Clearance Appendix E: Generator Specifications Appendix F: Legal Description

APPENDIX A

MINOR NEW SOURCE REVIEW PERMIT APPLICATION

EPA Form No. S900-369 F.PA ICRNo. 1230.27

0MB Control No. 2060·0003 Approval expires 4/30/2017

Aftftllcant's Statement fto be si=ed bv the annllcant) I certify that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision according to a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete.

Name: ~ Name: ),,..., C.~/ t:k_1t-c-o Date: 'i'- '2..j:- (7 {Signature) (Print or Type)

Title: (;z_ tie_ 2W l:,s-f1tlrflf___

Request for Coverage: Boilers and Emergency Engines Page 12 of 26 Version 1.0

I I -1

L__ -

' -

' I -

L__

I I I -

' -

I, I I I I -

OMB Control No. 2060-0003 Approval expires 04/30/2017

United States Environmental Protection Agency Pacific Southwest – Region 9 Federal Minor New Source Review Program in Indian Country

Application for New Construction Please check all that apply to show how you are using this form:

Proposed Construction of a New Source

☐ Proposed Construction of New Equipment at an Existing Source ☐ Proposed Modification of an Existing Source ☐ Other – Please Explain____________________________

Please submit information to:

U.S. EPA at:

Air Division, Permits Office (Air-3) U.S. EPA, Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105

For more information: http://www.epa.gov/caa-permitting/tribal-nsr-permits-region-9, call (415) 972-3974, or email [email protected].

A. General Source Information

Tribe:

The Tribal Environmental Contact for the specific reservation:

Please contact EPA Region 9 if you need assistance in identifying the appropriate Tribal Environmental Contact and address.

1. Company Name

McKesson Corporation

2. Source Name

Chaparral Commerce Center

3. Type of Operation

Office Buildings

4. Portable Source? Yes No 5. Temporary Source? Yes No

6. NAICS Code

531120

7. SIC Code

651202

8. Physical Address (home base for portable sources)

5601 and 5701 North Pima Road, Scottsdale, AZ 85250

9. Reservation*

Salt Lake - Pima

10. County*

Maricopa

11a. Latitude*

33.5149

11b. Longitude*

-111.8907

12a. Quarter-Quarter Section*

See legal description In Appendix F

12b. Section* 12c. Township* 12d. Range*

* Provide all locations of operation for portable sources

EPA Form No. 5900-248


B. Contact Information

1. Owner Name McKesson Corporation

Title

Mailing Address

10101 Woodloch Forest Dr., The Woodlands, TX 77380

Email Address [email protected]

Telephone Number (816) 390-1971

Facsimile Number

2. Operator Name (if different from owner)

Same

Title

Mailing Address

Email Address

Telephone Number Facsimile Number

3. Source Contact Adrian Romo

Title Assistant Service Manager

Mailing Address 5701 North Pima Rd., Scottsdale, AZ 85250


Telephone Number 480-633-4004

Facsimile Number 480-663-4789

4. Compliance Contact Jim Fleer

Title Director, Environmental Services

Mailing Address One Post Street, San Francisco, CA 94101


Telephone Number 913-238-8348

Facsimile Number

EPA Form No. 5900-248 Page 2 of 14


C. PREVIOUS PERMIT ACTIONS (Provide information in this format for each permit that has been issued to this source. Provide as an attachment if additional space is necessary)

Facility Name on the Permit: (None)

Permit Number

Date of the Permit Action

Facility Name on the Permit

Permit Number



Permit Number



Permit Number



Permit Number




D. Attachments

Include all of the following information as attachments to this form

FORM SYNMIN - New Source Review Synthetic Minor Limit Request Form, if synthetic minor limits are being requested.

This form is not applicable as the facility is not requesting synthetic minor limits

Narrative description of the proposed production processes. This description should follow the flow of the process flow diagram to be submitted with this application.

This project consists of adding two emergency-only generators to the Chaparral Commerce Center. The generators are rated at 1,500 kW each, will use diesel fuel, and will comply with NSPS IIII. The process flow diagram can be found on the following page. The engine will combust diesel fuel which will generate power to be used in emergency situations and combustion by-products will be emitted to the atmosphere.

Process flow chart identifying all proposed processing, combustion, handling, storage, and emission control equipment.

The process flow diagram for the engines can be found following this section.

A list and descriptions of all proposed emission units and air pollution-generating activities.

The only emission sources are the two proposed 1,500 kW diesel fired emergency generators.

Type and quantity of fuels, including sulfur content of fuels, proposed to be used on a daily, annual and maximum hourly basis.

Each generator is capable of combusting 104.6 gallons of diesel fuel per hour. The generator specifications can be found in Appendix E. Since emergency engines can operate up to 500 hours per year, each engine has the capacity of combusting 2,510.4 gallons/day and 52,300 gallons/year. The engines will utilize low sulfur diesel fuel at 0.0015% sulfur.

Type and quantity of raw materials used or final product produced proposed to be used on a daily, annual and maximum hourly basis.

The only raw materials to be used is diesel fuel and the throughput can be seen in the previous question.

Proposed operating schedule, including number of hours per day, number of days per week and number of weeks per year.

The generators will be tested monthly and be operated on an as needed basis.

A list and description of all proposed emission controls, control efficiencies, emission limits, and monitoring for each emission unit and air pollution generating activity.

The generators will not have any emission controls, however they will comply with the emission limits and



monitoring contained in NSPS Subpart IIII.

Criteria Pollutant Emissions - Estimates of Current Actual Emissions, Current Allowable Emissions, Post-Change Uncontrolled Emissions, and Post-Change Allowable Emissions for the following air pollutants: particulate matter, PM10, PM2.5, sulfur oxides (SOx), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compound (VOC), lead (Pb) and lead compounds, fluorides (gaseous and particulate), sulfuric acid mist (H2SO4), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), total reduced sulfur (TRS) and reduced sulfur compounds, including all calculations for the estimates.

Potential to emit calculations can be found in Appendix B.

These estimates are to be made for each emission unit, emission generating activity, and the project/source in total. Note, there are no insignificant emission units or activities in this permitting program, only exempted units and activities. Please see the regulation for a list of exempted units and activities.

Air Quality Review

These generators are emergency-only generators and will only be operated in emergency situations. The generators also have emission guarantees that are well below standard emission factors from AP-42. The emission guarantees can be found in the generator specifications in Appendix E. It is our belief that the impacts from the generators will be minimal based on the fact that these generators are classified as emergency-only and will comply with NSPS Subpart IIII.

ESA (Endangered Species Act)

The Threatened or Endangered Species Report can be found in Appendix C.

NHPA (National Historic Preservation Act)

The NHPA review has been completed for this project and the environmental clearance from the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community can be found in Appendix D.


To atmosphere

Diesel fired emergency generators rated at Diesel Fuel Power 1,500 kw each (2)

Pollutant Total Actual Total Allowable or Emissions (tpy) Potential Emissions

(TPY)

PM 0.07 0.07

PM10 0.07 0.07

PM 2.5 0.07 0.07

SOx 0.01 0.01

NOx 12.19 12.19

CO 1.11 1.11

VOC 0.22 0.22

Pb

NH3

Fluorides

H2SO4

H2S

TRS

RSC


E. TABLE OF ESTIMATED EMISSIONS

The following estimates of the total emissions in tons/year for all pollutants contained in your worksheet stated above should be provided.

PM - Particulate Matter PM10 - Particulate Matter less than 10 microns in size PM2.5 - Particulate Matter less than 2.5microns in size SO2 - Sulfur Oxides NOx - Nitrogen Oxides CO - Carbon Monoxide VOC - Volatile Organic Compound Pb - Lead and lead compounds Fluorides - Gaseous and particulates H2SO4 - Sulfuric Acid Mist H2S - Hydrogen Sulfide TRS - Total Reduced Sulfur RSC - Reduced Sulfur Compounds

Emissions calculations must include fugitive emissions if the source is one the following listed sources, pursuant to CAA Section 302(j):

(a) Coal cleaning plants (with thermal dryers); (b) Kraft pulp mills; (c) Portland cement plants; (d) Primary zinc smelters; (e) Iron and steel mills; (f) Primary aluminum ore reduction plants; (g) Primary copper smelters; (h) Municipal incinerators capable of charging more

than 250 tons of refuse per day; (i) Hydrofluoric, sulfuric, or nitric acid plants; (j) Petroleum refineries; (k) Lime plants; (l) Phosphate rock processing plants; (m) Coke oven batteries; (n) Sulfur recovery plants; (o) Carbon black plants (furnace process); (p) Primary lead smelters; (q) Fuel conversion plants;

(r) Sintering plants; (s) Secondary metal production plants; (t) Chemical process plants (u) Fossil-fuel boilers (or combination thereof) totaling

more than 250 million British thermal units per hour heat input;

(v) Petroleum storage and transfer units with a total storage capacity exceeding 300,000 barrels;

(w) Taconite ore processing plants; (x) Glass fiber processing plants; (y) Charcoal production plants; (z) Fossil fuel-fired steam electric plants of more that

250 million British thermal units per hour heat input, and

(aa) Any other stationary source category which, as of August 7, 1980, is being regulated under section 111 or 112 of the Act


I I I I I I


E(ii) – Proposed New Construction at an Existing Source or Modification of an Existing Source Pollutant Current

Actual Emissions

(tpy)

Current Allowable Emissions

(tpy)

Post-Change Potential Emissions

(tpy)

Post-Change Allowable Emissions

(tpy) PM

PM10

PM 2.5

SO2

NOx

CO

VOC

Pb

Fluorides

H2SO4

H2S

TRS

RSC

PM - Particulate Matter PM10 - Particulate Matter less than 10 microns in size PM2.5 - Particulate Matter less than 2.5 microns in size SO2 - Sulfur Oxides NOx - Nitrogen Oxides CO - Carbon Monoxide VOC - Volatile Organic Compound Pb - Lead and lead compounds Fluorides - Gaseous and particulates H2SO4 - Sulfuric Acid Mist H2S - Hydrogen Sulfide TRS - Total Reduced Sulfur RSC - Reduced Sulfur Compounds

The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 20 hours per response, unless a modeling analysis is required. If a modeling analysis is required, the public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 60 hours per response .Send comments on the Agency’s need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address.



Instructions (Please do not include a copy of these instructions in the application you submit to us.)

Use of This Form

Proposed new construction or modifications should first be evaluated to determine if the change is major under the major NSR program using the procedures at 40 CFR 52.21 (i.e., baseline actual to projected actual applicability test). If the proposed construction does not qualify as a major under that test, then it may be subject to the requirements of the minor NSR rule at 40 CFR 49.151.

Helpful Definitions from the Federal Minor NSR Rule (40 CFR 49) – This is not a comprehensive list.

40 CFR 49.152(d) - Modification means any physical or operational change at a source that would cause an increase in the allowable emissions of the affected emissions units for any regulated NSR pollutant or that would cause the emission of any regulated NSR pollutant not previously emitted.

The following exemptions apply:

(1) A physical or operational change does not include routine maintenance, repair, or replacement.

(2) An increase in the hours of operation or in the production rate is not considered an operational change unless such increase is prohibited under any federally-enforceable permit condition or other permit condition that is enforceable as a practical matter.

(3) A change in ownership at a source is not considered a modification.

40 CFR 49.152(d) - Allowable emissions means ‘‘allowable emissions’’ as defined in §52.21(b)(16), except that the allowable emissions for any emissions unit are calculated considering any emission limitations that are enforceable as a practical matter on the emissions unit’s potential to emit.

52.21(b)(16) - Allowable emissions means the emissions rate of a stationary source calculated using the maximum rated capacity of the source (unless the source is subject to federally enforceable limits which restrict the operating rate, or hours of operation, or both) and the most stringent of the following:

(i) The applicable standards as set forth in 40 CFR parts 60 and 61;

(ii) The applicable State Implementation Plan emissions limitation, including those with a future compliance date; or



(iii) The emissions rate specified as a federally enforceable permit condition, including those with a future compliance date.

A. General Facility Information

1. Company Name & Operator Name (if the operator of the facility is different than the owner, please provide this information): Provide the complete company and operator names. For corporations, include divisions or subsidiary names, if any.

2. Facility Name: Provide the facility name. Please note that a facility is a site, place, location, etc… that may contain one or more air pollution emitting units.

3. Type of Operation: Indicate the generally accepted name for the operation (i.e., asphalt plant, gas station, dry cleaner, sand & gravel mining, oil and gas wellsite, tank battery, etc.).

4. Portable Source: Will this facility operate in more than one location? Some examples of portable sources include asphalt batch plants and concrete batch plants.

5. Temporary Source: A temporary source, in general, would have emissions that are expected last less than 12 months.

6. NAICS Code: North American Industry Classification System. The NAICS Code for your facility can be found at the following link North American Industry Classification System (http://www.census.gov/epcd/naics/nsic2ndx.htm#S1).

7. SIC Code: Standard Industrial Classification Code. Although the new North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) has replaced the SIC codes, much of the Clean Air Act permitting processes continue to use these codes. The SIC Code for your facility can be found at the following link Standard Industrial Classification Code (http://www.osha.gov/pls/imis/sic_manual.html).

8. Physical Address: Provide the actual address of where you are proposing to construct the new facility, not the mailing address. Include the State and the ZIP Code.

9. Reservation: Provide the name of the Indian reservation within which the facility will be constructed.

10. County: Provide the County within which the source will be constructed.

11a & 11b. Latitude & Longitude: These are GPS (global positioning system) coordinates.

12a – 12d. Section-Township-Range: Please provide these coordinates in 1/4 Section/Section/Township/Range. (e.g., SW ¼, NE ¼ S36/T10N/R21E).

B. Contact Information

Please provide the information, requested, in full.



1. Company Contact: Provide the full name of the primary contact for the company that owns the facility.

2. Operator Contact: Provide the name of the primary contact for the company that operates the facility if the company operating the facility is different from the company that owns the facility.

3. Permitting Contact: Provide the name of primary contact, for permitting decisions, at the company that owns the facility or the company that operates the facility.

4. Compliance Contact: Provide the name of primary contact, responsible for compliance of the facility, at the company that owns the facility or the company that operates the facility. If this is the same as the Permitting Contact please note this on the form.

B. Current Permit Information

Provide a list of all air quality permits that have been issued for this facility. This should include any Federal Minor New Source Review (MNSR), Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) or Non-Attainment New Source Review (NA NSR) permits, in addition to the most recent Part 71 permit. The permit number must be included with each permit identified.

C. Attachments

This section lists the information needed to complete the requested approval. This information should be accompanied by the supporting information listed on the form and described below. The information should be presented in enough detail to document how the facility is currently operating and/or how it is proposed to be operated.

FORM SYNMIN

If synthetic minor limits are being requested, a synthetic Minor Limit Application should be included with this application.

Narrative description of the proposed production processes.

1. The narrative description should follow the flow of the process flow diagram to be submitted with this application. This needs to be as comprehensive as possible to help in understanding the proposed facility and how it will be operated. For example:

What are the raw materials? What are the properties of the raw materials? Does the production process include heating, drying, the application of chemicals, etc? How will the raw materials be affected by this process? What are the out puts from each step of the process (i.e., crushed ore, dry gas, water, etc…)? Etc….



2. The proposed operating schedule presented in terms of hours per day, days per week, and weeks per year.

3. A list of the type and quantity of fuels and/or raw materials used. Each fuel and raw material should be described in enough detail to indicate its basic chemical components.

A process flow chart identifying all proposed processing, combustion, handling, storage, and emission control equipment. This flow chart should illustrate the detailed narrative description requested above.

List and describe all proposed units, emission units and air pollution-generating activities. At a minimum, provide the following:

1. The hourly, daily and annual maximum operating rates for each operating unit, production process, and activity.

2. The hourly, daily and annual maximum firing rates for each fuel and combustion equipment.

3. The capacity for storage units and the hourly, daily and annual maximum throughput of material in the storage units.

4. Material and product handling equipment and the hourly, daily and annual maximum throughput of material and product.

5. Tank designs, tank storage capacities, hourly, daily and annual maximum throughput of material and product.

Type and quantity of fuels, including sulfur content of fuels, proposed to be used on a daily, annual and maximum hourly basis.

Type and quantity of raw materials used or final product produced proposed to be used on a daily, annual and maximum hourly basis.

Proposed operating schedule, including number of hours per day, number of days per week and number of weeks per year.

A list and description of all proposed emission controls, control efficiencies, emission limits, and monitoring for each emission unit and air pollution generating activity.

1. Include manufacturer specifications and guarantees for each control device.

Criteria Pollutant Emissions Estimates

Estimates of Current Actual Emissions, Current Allowable Emissions, Post-Change Uncontrolled Emissions, and Post-Change Allowable Emissions for the following air pollutants: particulate matter, PM10, PM2.5, sulfur oxides (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compound (VOC), lead (Pb) and lead compounds, ammonia (NH3), fluorides (gaseous and particulate), sulfuric acid mist (H2SO4), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), total reduced sulfur (TRS) and reduced sulfur compounds, including all calculations for the estimates.



1. These estimates are to be made for each emission unit, emission generating activity, in addition to total emissions.

2. The information should include all of the supporting calculations, assumptions and references. Emission estimates must address all emission units and pollutants proposed and/or affected by the limitation and be presented in short term (e.g. pounds per hour) as well as annual (tons per year) units.

3. Any emission estimates submitted to the Regional Administrator must be verifiable using currently accepted engineering criteria. The following procedures are generally acceptable for estimating emissions from air pollution sources:

Unit-specific emission tests; Mass balance calculations; Published, verifiable emission factors that are applicable to the unit. (i.e. manufacturer

specifications)

Other engineering calculations; or Other procedures to estimate emissions specifically approved by the Regional

Administrator.

4. Guidance for estimating emissions can be found at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/efpac/index.html.

Current Actual Emissions: Current actual emissions for a pollutant is expressed in tpy and generally is calculated by multiplying the actual hourly emissions rate in pounds per hour (lbs/hr) times actual hours operated (which is the number of hours in a year) and dividing by 2,000 (which is the number of pounds in a ton).

1. For an existing air pollution source (permitted and unpermitted) that operated prior to the application submittal, the current actual emissions are the actual rate of emissions for the preceding calendar year and must be calculated using the actual operating hours, production rates, in-place control equipment, and types of materials processed, stored, or combusted during the preceding calendar year. The emission estimates must be based upon actual test data or, in the absence of such data, upon procedures acceptable to the Regional Administrator.

Current Allowable Emissions: Current allowable emissions for a pollutant is expressed in tpy and generally is calculated by multiplying the allowed hourly emissions rate in pounds per hour (lbs/hr) times allowed hours (which is the number of hours in a year) and dividing by 2,000 (which is the number of pounds in a ton).

1. “Allowed” means the source is restricted by permit conditions that limit its emissions and are enforceable as a practical matter (i.e., allowable emissions). The allowable emissions for any



emissions unit are calculated considering any emissions limitations that are enforceable as a practical matter on the unit’s PTE.

2. For an existing permitted air pollution source that operated prior to the application submittal, the current allowable emissions are the allowable rate of emissions for the preceding calendar year and must be calculated using the permitted operating hours, production rates, in-place control equipment, and types of materials processed, stored, or combusted during the preceding calendar year.

3. For an existing air pollution source that does not have an established allowable emissions level prior to the modification must report the pre-change uncontrolled emissions.

Post-Change Potential Emissions (Potential uncontrolled emissions from proposed project): This is the maximum capacity of a source to emit a pollutant under its physical and operational design. This is expressed in tpy and generally is calculated by multiplying the maximum hourly emissions rate in pounds per hour (lbs/hr) times 8,760 hours (which is the number of hours in a year) and dividing by 2,000 (which is the number of pounds in a ton).

Post-Change Allowable Emissions: A source’s allowable emissions for a pollutant is expressed in tpy and generally is calculated by multiplying the allowed hourly emissions rate in pounds per hour (lbs/hr) times allowed hours (which is the number of hours in a year) and dividing by 2,000 (which is the number of pounds in a ton).

1. Unless the source is restricted by permit conditions or other requirements that are enforceable as a practical matter, the post-change allowable emissions would be equivalent to post-change uncontrolled emissions. For the post-change allowable emissions a lower level of allowable emissions may be proposed.

2. For physical or operational changes at minor sources and for minor physical or operational changes at major sources, the total increase in allowable emissions resulting from your proposed change would be the sum of following:

For each new emissions unit that is to be added, the emissions increase would be the potential to emit of each unit.

For each emissions unit with an allowable emissions limit that is to be changed or replaced, the emissions increase would be the allowable emissions of the emissions unit after the change or replacement minus the allowable emissions prior to the change or replacement. However, this may not be a negative value. If the allowable emissions of an emissions unit would be reduced as a result of the change or replacement, use zero in the calculation.

For each unpermitted emissions unit (i.e., a unit without any emissions limitations before the change) that is to be changed or replaced, the emissions increase would be the allowable emissions of the unit after the change or replacement minus the potential to emit prior to the change or replacement. However, this may not be a negative value. If



the allowable emissions of an emissions unit would be reduced as a result of the change or replacement, use zero in the calculation.

Air Quality Review

Provide a narrative description of the current air quality conditions and the expected impact the permitted source would have on that air quality. Factors to include in the qualitative discussion are meteorology, terrain, elevation, distance to ambient air, expected emissions, stack heights, etc…

Your reviewing authority may require you to provide additional information used to determine impacts that may result from your new source or modification. You may be required to conduct and submit an Air Quality Impact Analysis (AQIA) using dispersion modeling in accordance with 40 CFR part 51, Appendix W. If required, and the AQIA demonstrates that construction of your source or modification would cause or contribute to a NAAQS or PSD increment violation, you will also required to further reduce its impact before you could obtain a permit.

ESA

The Endangered Species Act requires us, in consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or the NOAA Fisheries Service, to ensure that actions we authorize are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any listed species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of designated critical habitat of such species.

To expedite the approval of your proposed construction, we encourage you to identify any listed species that you may be readily aware of that could be affected by your proposal. The following website has been provided to assist you: http://www.fws.gov/endangered/

Simply enter the State and County in which you propose to construct to obtain a general listing.

NHPA

The National Historic Preservation Act requires us, in consultation with State and/or Tribal Historic Preservation Officers to ensure that actions we authorize are not likely to affect cultural resources.

To expedite the approval of your proposed construction, we encourage you to identify any cultural resources that you may be readily aware of that could be affected by your proposal. The following website has been provided to assist you: http://nrhp.focus.nps.gov/natreghome.do?searchtype=natreghome

Simply enter the State and County in which you propose to construct to obtain a general listing.


APPENDIX B

POTENTIAL TO EMIT CALCULATIONS

I I I I I

I I I I

I

Potential To E mit Calculator for Boilers and E mergency Engines 7/1/2016

This spreadsheet helps estimate a facility's potential to emit. It is provided for the convenience of the permitted community. Emission factor sources are subject to revision or correction. It is the permittee's responsibility to determine their emissions. The permittee should consult with the reviewing authority to determine the appropriateness of this calculator for its source.

If you have one or more of the following units that are exempt from the Indian Country Minor NSR Program, please contact your EPA Regional office before you use this calculator to determine whether you need to obtain a minor NSR permit: Internal combustion engines used for landscaping purposes; Emergency generators, designed solely for the purpose of providing electrical power during power outages; in nonattainment areas classified as Serious or lower, the total maximum manufacturer's site-rated hp of all units shall be below 500; in attainment areas, the total maximum manufacturer's site-rated hp of all units shall be below 1,000; Stationary internal combustion engines with a manufacturer's site-rated hp of less than 5; and Furnaces or boilers used for space heating that use only gaseous fuel, with a total maximum heat input (i.e., from all units combined) of in nonattainment areas classified as Serious or lower, 5 MMBtu/hr or less; in nonattainment areas classified as Severe or Extreme, 2 MMBtu/hr or less; and in attainment areas, 10 MMBtu/hr or less.

Directions: Enter the facility's information below. Write the letter "Y" or "N" next to each fuel type to indicate that the facility does or does not burn that type of fuel.

For Total Boiler Heat Input - only add together the heat input of those units that are rated at least 10.0 MMBtu/hr or larger, unless in a severe or extreme ozone nonattainment area. Include all units 2.0 MMBtu/hr and greater in severe or extreme ozone nonattainment areas. For Total Small Boilers and Heaters Input - only add together the heat input of those boilers and heaters that are rated at less than 10.0 MMBtu/hr, unless in a severe or extreme ozone nonattainment area. Include all units less than 2.0 MMBtu/hr in severe or extreme ozone nonattainment areas. For Emergency Generators/Engines - this calculator does not calculate emissions from non-emergency (prime) engines. If you have non-emergency engines please contact your reviewing authority

Facility Profile* Converter

Total Boiler Heat Input -

Fuels Used Natural Gas-

LPG Liquid Fuel (distillate, diesel, etc.)

0

N N N

(MMBtu/hr)

(Y or N) (Y or N) (Y or N)

Total of boilers 10.0 MMBtu/hr and greater, unless in extreme ozone nonattainment area then include 2.0 MMBtu/hr and greater.

Sulfur % 0.0015 Default = 0.0015

Insert Value: Convert MMscf/yr to MMBtu/yr 345 MMscf 351900 MMBtu/yr

40.1712 MMBtu/hr

Total Small Boilers and Heaters Input -

Fuels Used Natural Gas

LPG Liquid Fuel (distiallate, diesel, etc.)

0

N N N

(MMBtu/hr


Total of boilers less than 10.0 MMBtu/hr, unless in extreme ozone nonattainment area then less than 2.0 MMBtu/hr.

Sulfur % 0.0015 Defalut = 0.0015

Emergency Generator/Engines -Fuels Used

Diesel-Gasoline

Natural Gas/LPG

4024

Y N N

(hp)


Sulfur % 0.0015 Default = 0.0015

Ozone Attainment Status Severe or Extreme Ozone

Nonattainment N (Y or N)

*The boiler and emergency engine permit and this calculator are not intened for use with non-emergency engines; for non-emergency engines sources should refer to the engines general permit.

Page 1 of 5

Potential To Emit Calculator for Boilers and Emergency Engines 7/1/2016

PTE (ton/yr)

Process PM PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX CO VOC CO2 Single HAP Combined HAP Boilers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Auxiliary Heaters 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Engine/Generator 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.01 12.19 1.11 0.22 1156.90 1.19 3.82 Total PTE 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.01 12.19 1.11 0.22 1156.90 1.19 3.82

Page 2 of 5

I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I


Emissions from Boilers and Auxiliary Heaters - Criteria Pollutants 0 Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Purple values are pulled from other worksheet

Blue values are results

Worst Case PTE (ton/yr) Pollutant

PM PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX CO VOC CO2 Single HAP Combined HAP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Fuel Type: Natural Gas Used: N

Emission Factor1 (lb/MMSCF)

Pollutant PM 2PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX CO VOC CO2 Single HAP Combined HAP 7.6 7.6 7.6 0.6 37.74 84 5.5 120000 0.075 0.083

PTE (ton/yr) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Note: 1. Emission factors are from AP-42, Chapter 1.4, Tables 1.4-1 and 1.4-2 (updated 07/98). 2. Assumed PM and PM2.5 emissions are equal to PM10 emissions. 3. If in extreme or severe ozone nonattainment, NOx emission factor reflects NOx limit in general permit 4. CO2 is calculated at Natural Gas @ 8270 hr/yr and backup diesel at 500 hr/yr, all others are NG @8760 plus backup diesel at 500 hr/yr. Methodology PTE (ton/yr) = Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) x 1 MMSCF/1,020 MMBtu x EF (lb/MMSCF) x 8760 hr/yr x 1 ton/2000 lb

Fuel Type: LPG Used: N Sulfur Content: 0.00 %

Emission Factor1 (lbs/kgal)

Pollutant PM 2PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX CO VOC CO2 Single HAP Combined HAP 0.7 0.7 0.7 0 3.478 7.5 1.0 12500 0.075 0.083

PTE (ton/yr) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Note: 1. Emission factors are from AP-42, Chapter 1.5, Tables 1.5 (updated 07/08). 2. Assumed PM and PM2.5 emissions are equal to PM10 emissions.

Methodology PTE (ton/yr) = Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) x 1 kgal/91.5 MMBtu x EF (lb/kgal) x 8760 hr/yr x 1 ton/2000 lb

Fuel Type: Liquid Fuel Used: N Sulfur Content: 0.002 %

Emission Factor1 (lb/kgal)

Pollutant PM2 PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX CO VOC CO2 Single HAP Combined HAP 2.0 3.3 2.55 0.213 5.069 5.0 0.34 22300 0.033 0.0405

PTE (ton/yr) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Note: 1. Emission factors are from AP-42, Chapter 1.3, Tables 1.3-1, 1.3-2, and 1.3-3 for Fuel Oil Combustion (updated 05/10). 2. Assume PM emissions are equal to PM10 emissions

Methodology PTE (ton/yr) = Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) x 1 kgal/140 MMBtu x EF (lb/kgal) x 8760 hr/yr x 1 ton/2000 lb

Fuel Type: Emergency Backup Diesel Used: N Sulfur Content: 0.002 %


Pollutant PM2 PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX CO VOC CO2 Single HAP Combined HAP 2.0 3.3 2.55 0.213 1.507 5.0 0.34 22300 0.00118 0.0038

PTE (ton/yr) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Note: 1. Emission factors are from AP-42, Chapter 1.3, Tables 1.3-1, 1.3-2, and 1.3-3 for Fuel Oil Combustion (updated 05/10). 2. Assume PM emissions are equal to PM10 emissions. 3. Results are already added to Natural Gas PTE. Methodology PTE (ton/yr) = Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) x 1 kgal/140 MMBtu x EF (lb/kgal) x 8760 hr/yr x 1 ton/2000 lb

Page 3 of 5

I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I

Potential To Emit Calculator for Boilers 7/1/2016

Emissions from Emergency Generator/Engine - Criteria Pollutants Engine Size: 4024 hp Purple values are pulled from other worksheet

Blue values are results Diesel Used: Y



Engine Type: Diesel Engine ( 600 hp) Used: Y Sulfur Content: 0.00 %

Emission Factor1 (lbs/hp-hr)

Pollutant PM PM10 2PM2.5 SO2 NOX CO VOC

3 CO2 Single HAP Combined HAP

6.608E-05 6.61E-05 6.61E-05 1.21E-05 0.012115 1.10E-03 2.20E-04 1.15 0.00118 0.0038

Limited PTE (ton/yr) 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.01 12.19 1.11 0.22 1156.90 1.19 3.82

Note: 1. Emission factors are from Chapter 3.4, Tables 3.4-1 and 3.4-2 for Large Stationary Diesel and Dual Fuel Engines (updated 10/96). 2. Assume PM2.5 emissions are equal to PM10 emissions. 3. Assume TOC (total organic compounds) emissions equal to VOC emissions. 4. Assume 500 hours/yr of operation for an emergency engine Methodology PTE (ton/yr) = Engine Capacity (hp) x EF (lb/hp-hr) x 8760 hr x 1 ton/2000 lb

Engine Type: Gasoline Used: N


Pollutant PM2 PM10 2PM2.5 SO2 NOX CO VOC

3 CO2 Single Hap Combined HAP 7.21E-04 7.21E-04 7.21E-04 5.91E-04 0.011 6.96E-03 2.05E-02 1.08E+00 1.18E-03 3.80E-03

PTE (ton/yr) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Note: 1. Emission factors are from Chapter 3.3, Table 3.3-1 (updated 10/96). 2. Assume PM and PM2.5 emissions are equal to PM10 emissions. 3. Assume TOC (total organic compounds) emissions equal to VOC emissions. 4. Assume 500 hours/yr of operation for an emergency engine. Methodology PTE (ton/yr) = Engine Capacity (hp) x EF (lb/hp-hr) x 8760 hr x 1 ton/2000 lb

Engine Type: Natural Gas/LPG Used: N


Pollutant PM2 PM10 2PM2.5 SO2 NOX CO VOC

3 CO2 Single HAP Combined HAP 1.67E-04 1.67E-04 1.67E-04 5.06E-06 1.90E-02 3.20E-02 2.55E-04 0.946 0.00045408 0.0006192

PTE (ton/yr) FALSE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Note: 1. Emission factors are from Chapter 3.3, Table 3.3-1 (updated 10/96). 2. Assume PM and PM2.5 emissions are equal to PM10 emissions. 3. Assume TOC (total organic compounds) emissions equal to VOC emissions. 4. Assume 500 hours/yr of operation for an emergency engine. Methodology PTE (ton/yr) = Engine Capacity (hp) x EF (lb/hp-hr) x 8760 hr x 1 ton/2000 lb

Page 4 of 5

I ; ; ; ; ; ; I I

I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I


Emissions from Auxiliary Heaters - Criteria Pollutants 0 Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Purple values are pulled from other worksheet

Blue values are results



Fuel Type: Natural Gas Used: N

Emission Factor1 (lb/MMSCF)

Pollutant PM 2PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX CO VOC CO2 Single HAP Combined HAP 7.6 7.6 7.6 0.6 100 84 5.5 120000 0.075 0.083

PTE (ton/yr) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Note: 1. Emission factors are from AP-42, Chapter 1.4, Tables 1.4-1 and 1.4-2 (updated 07/98). 2. Assumed PM and PM2.5 emissions are equal to PM10 emissions. 3. If in extreme or severe ozone nonattainment, NOx emission factor reflects NOx limit in general permit. Methodology PTE (ton/yr) = Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) x 1 MMSCF/1,020 MMBtu x EF (lb/MMSCF) x 8760 hr/yr x 1 ton/2000 lb

Fuel Type: LPG Used: N Sulfur Content: 0.00 %

Emission Factor1 (lbs/kgal)

Pollutant PM 2PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX CO VOC CO2 Single HAP Combined HAP 0.7 0.7 0.7 0 13 7.5 1.0 12500 0.075 0.083

PTE (ton/yr) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Note: 1. Emission factors are from AP-42, Chapter 1.5, Tables 1.5 (updated 07/08). 2. Assumed PM and PM2.5 emissions are equal to PM10 emissions.

Methodology PTE (ton/yr) = Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) x 1 kgal/91.5 MMBtu x EF (lb/kgal) x 8760 hr/yr x 1 ton/2000 lb

Fuel Type: Liquid Fuel Used: N Sulfur Content: 0.0015 %


Pollutant PM2 PM10 PM2.5 SO2 NOX CO VOC CO2 Single HAP Combined HAP 2.0 3.3 2.55 0.213 20 5.0 0.34 22300 0.033 0.04035

PTE (ton/yr) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Note: 1. Emission factors are from AP-42, Chapter 1.3, Tables 1.3-1, 1.3-2, and 1.3-3 for Fuel Oil Combustion (updated 05/10). 2. Assume PM emissions are equal to PM10 emissions.

Methodology PTE (ton/yr) = Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) x 1 kgal/140 MMBtu x EF (lb/kgal) x 8760 hr/yr x 1 ton/2000 lb

APPENDIX C

THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES REPORT

Arizona Environmental Online Review Tool Report

Arizona Game and Fish Department Mission To conserve Arizona's diverse wildlife resources and manage for safe, compatible outdoor recreation

opportunities for current and future generations.

Project Name: 65177250

Project Description: Construction of two new Office/Warehouse buildings.

Project Type: Development Within Municipalities (Urban Growth), Commercial/industrial (mall) and associated

infrastructure, New construction

Contact Person: Eric Lyding

Organization: Terracon

On Behalf Of: CONSULTING

Project ID: HGIS-05733

Please review the entire report for project type and/or species recommendations for the location information entered. Please retain a copy for future reference.

Page 1 of 9

Arizona Game and Fish Department project_report_65177250_23653_24276.pdf Project ID: HGIS-05733 Review Date: 7/10/2017 12:58:14 PM

Disclaimer:

1. This Environmental Review is based on the project study area that was entered. The report must be updated if the project study area, location, or the type of project changes.

2. This is a preliminary environmental screening tool. It is not a substitute for the potential knowledge gained by having a biologist conduct a field survey of the project area. This review is also not intended to replace environmental consultation (including federal consultation under the Endangered Species Act), land use permitting, or the Departments review of site-specific projects.

3. The Departments Heritage Data Management System (HDMS) data is not intended to include potential distribution of special status species. Arizona is large and diverse with plants, animals, and environmental conditions that are ever changing. Consequently, many areas may contain species that biologists do not know about or species previously noted in a particular area may no longer occur there. HDMS data contains information about species occurrences that have actually been reported to the Department. Not all of Arizona has been surveyed for special status species, and surveys that have been conducted have varied greatly in scope and intensity. Such surveys may reveal previously undocumented population of species of special concern.

4. HabiMap Arizona data, specifically Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) under our State Wildlife Action Plan (SWAP) and Species of Economic and Recreational Importance (SERI), represent potential species distribution models for the State of Arizona which are subject to ongoing change, modification and refinement. The status of a wildlife resource can change quickly, and the availability of new data will necessitate a refined assessment.

Locations Accuracy Disclaimer: Project locations are assumed to be both precise and accurate for the purposes of environmental review. The creator/owner of the Project Review Report is solely responsible for the project location and thus the correctness of the Project Review Report content.

Page 2 of 9


Recommendations Disclaimer:

1. The Department is interested in the conservation of all fish and wildlife resources, including those species listed in this report and those that may have not been documented within the project vicinity as well as other game and nongame wildlife.

2. Recommendations have been made by the Department, under authority of Arizona Revised Statutes Title 5 (Amusements and Sports), 17 (Game and Fish), and 28 (Transportation).

3. Potential impacts to fish and wildlife resources may be minimized or avoided by the recommendations generated from information submitted for your proposed project. These recommendations are preliminary in scope, designed to provide early considerations on all species of wildlife.

4. Making this information directly available does not substitute for the Department's review of project proposals, and should not decrease our opportunity to review and evaluate additional project information and/or new project proposals.

5. Further coordination with the Department requires the submittal of this Environmental Review Report with a cover letter and project plans or documentation that includes project narrative, acreage to be impacted, how construction or project activity(s) are to be accomplished, and project locality information (including site map). Once AGFD had received the information, please allow 30 days for completion of project reviews. Send requests to: Project Evaluation Program, Habitat Branch Arizona Game and Fish Department 5000 West Carefree Highway Phoenix, Arizona 85086-5000 Phone Number: (623) 236-7600 Fax Number: (623) 236-7366 Or [email protected]

6. Coordination may also be necessary under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and/or Endangered Species Act (ESA). Site specific recommendations may be proposed during further NEPA/ESA analysis or through coordination with affected agencies

Page 3 of 9

651177250 Aerial lmag:e Basemap With Loca·tor Map

Profrecl. !Boundary

Buffer,ed Projecl. Boundaiy

F'mjecl Size (acres),: 14.25

Lal/Long (DD): 33.5149 1-111 ,8901

County(s): Maricopa

AGFD Re9i0111(S): Mesa

TownshiipJRang~(s): i2N, RSE

USGS Quad(s),: PARADlSE V.AILLEY

Service layer Credits;: So11roe11: E51i. MERE, Delorme, TomTom, lntermap,, inCi.rernMI p corp., GEBC-0, USGS, FAO, NPS. NRCAN, G&C1Ra5e, IG~. Kadas!er NL, Ofd'nsinoe Surve'(. Esri Japan, METI, Esri Chl11a (Hong Kong),

0


Page 4 of 9

CJ

ll •Rd --+-•..,

D Projeot B·oundary D IBulfered Project Boundary

651177250 Web Map As Submitted IBy User

If

~ :r ~ ~

n

" iii a:: ,::: ~

111:i

t:; :::,:

4

.,, t~

z

~ 0:: 0 0 -i' .... C> (

651177250 Topo Basemap With l'ownship/Ranges and lland Ownership

w

D Project Boomlary 0 ButtereCI Progec:t Bouncla ry D Town,s.hi i;t,l'Ranges,

AZ. Game and Fish Dept.

BLM

BOR

Indian Re,s_

Military

Mixed/Other

Naliona1 P.arWMon.

Priva e

0 0.2750.55 1 ;1 --Project Si!Ze (acres): 14_25

l at/Long (DD): 33.5149 / · 11 1_8907

001.mly(s }: Ma1ric~a1

2.2 Mlles

stai'e and R·El9,iorllll Parks AGFO Region(s): Mesa

Stale rust

I.JG F1Xesl Se1Vioe

\Mldl,itt ArealRefUl)B

Townsh,p,riRange(s): T21N, RSE

USGS Ouael(s)t PARA01$E VAUEY

J;oore • £,1if HERE ~ mop, - i> c«-i, GEBOO, IJ5GS, FAD. MPS, NRCAN, Ci6c>BloH, IG.N, Kaela- NL, Of


Special Status Species and Special Areas Documented within 3 Miles of Project Vicinity

Scientific Name Common Name FWS USFS BLM NPL SGCN

Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community Community

Note: Status code definitions can be found at https://www.azgfd.com/wildlife/planning/wildlifeguidelines/statusdefinitions/ .

Species of Greatest Conservation Need Predicted within Project Vicinity based on Predicted Range Models


Agosia chrysogaster Longfin Dace SC S 1B

Aix sponsa Wood Duck 1B

Ammospermophilus harrisii 1B

Anthus spragueii 1A

Aquila chrysaetos S 1B

Athene cunicularia hypugaea S 1B

Botaurus lentiginosus 1B

Buteo regalis S 1B

Castor canadensis 1B

Catostomus clarkii S 1B

Catostomus insignis S 1B

Catostomus latipinnis S 1A

Catostomus sp. 3 S 1A

Chilomeniscus stramineus 1B

Chionactis occipitalis klauberi 1A

Colaptes chrysoides S 1B

Coluber bilineatus 1B

S 1B

Crotalus tigris 1B

Cyprinodon macularius 1A

Euderma maculatum Spotted Bat S 1B

Harris' Antelope Squirrel

Sprague's Pipit SC

Golden Eagle

Western Burrowing Owl SC S

American Bittern

Ferruginous Hawk SC

American Beaver

Desert Sucker SC S

Sonora Sucker SC S

Flannelmouth Sucker CCA

Little Colorado Sucker CCA S

Variable Sandsnake

Tucson Shovel-nosed Snake SC

Gilded Flicker

Sonoran Whipsnake

Corynorhinus townsendii pallescens Pale Townsend's Big-eared Bat SC S

Tiger Rattlesnake

Desert Pupfish LE

SC S

Eumops perotis californicus Greater Western Bonneted Bat SC S 1B

Falco peregrinus anatum American Peregrine Falcon SC S S 1A

Gila elegans Bonytail LE 1A

Gila robusta Roundtail chub CCA S S 1A

Gopherus morafkai Sonoran Desert Tortoise CCA S S 1A

Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle SC S S 1A

Heloderma suspectum Gila Monster 1A

Incilius alvarius Sonoran Desert Toad

Kinosternon sonoriense sonoriense Desert Mud Turtle S 1B

Lasiurus blossevillii Western Red Bat

1B

Page 7 of 9

S 1B


Species of Greatest Conservation Need Predicted within Project Vicinity based on Predicted Range Models


Lasiurus xanthinus Western Yellow Bat S 1B

Leptonycteris curasoae Lesser Long-nosed Bat LE yerbabuenae

Lithobates yavapaiensis Lowland Leopard Frog SC S S 1A

Macrotus californicus California Leaf-nosed Bat SC S 1B

Maricopella allynsmithi Squaw Peak Talussnail SC 1B

Melanerpes uropygialis Gila Woodpecker

Melospiza lincolnii Lincoln's Sparrow 1B

Melozone aberti

Micruroides euryxanthus

Myotis velifer

Myotis yumanensis

Nyctinomops femorosaccus

Panthera onca

Passerculus sandwichensis

Perognathus amplus

Phrynosoma solare

Phyllorhynchus browni

Poeciliopsis occidentalis occidentalis

Ptychocheilus lucius

Rallus obsoletus yumanensis

Setophaga petechia

Tadarida brasiliensis

Troglodytes pacificus

Vireo bellii arizonae

Vulpes macrotis

Xyrauchen texanus

Species of Economic and Recreation Importance Predicted within Project Vicinity

1A

1B

Abert's Towhee S 1B

Sonoran Coralsnake 1B

Cave Myotis SC S 1B

Yuma Myotis SC 1B

Pocketed Free-tailed Bat 1B

Jaguar LE 1A

Savannah Sparrow 1B

Arizona Pocket Mouse 1B

Regal Horned Lizard 1B

Saddled Leaf-nosed Snake 1B

Gila Topminnow LE 1A

Colorado Pikeminnow LE,XN 1A

Yuma Ridgeway's Rail LE 1A

Yellow Warbler 1B

Brazilian Free-tailed Bat 1B

Pacific Wren 1B

Arizona Bell's Vireo 1B

Kit Fox No Status

1B

Razorback Sucker LE 1A


Callipepla gambelii Gambel's Quail

Zenaida asiatica White-winged Dove

Zenaida macroura Mourning Dove

Page 8 of 9


Project Type: Development Within Municipalities (Urban Growth), Commercial/industrial (mall) and associated infrastructure, New construction

Project Type Recommendations: Minimization and mitigation of impacts to wildlife and fish species due to changes in water quality, quantity, chemistry, temperature, and alteration to flow regimes (timing, magnitude, duration, and frequency of floods) should be evaluated. Minimize impacts to springs, in-stream flow, and consider irrigation improvements to decrease water use. If dredging is a project component, consider timing of the project in order to minimize impacts to spawning fish and other aquatic species (include spawning seasons), and to reduce spread of exotic invasive species. We recommend early direct coordination with Project Evaluation Program for projects that could impact water resources, wetlands, streams, springs, and/or riparian habitats.

Based on the project type entered, coordination with Arizona Department of Water Resources may be required (http://www.azwater.gov/azdwr/default.aspx).

The Department requests further coordination to provide project/species specific recommendations, please contact Project Evaluation Program directly. [email protected]

Project Location and/or Species Recommendations: Tribal Lands are within the vicinity of your project area and may require further coordination. Please contact: Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community 10005 E Osborn Road Scottsdale, AZ 85256 (480) 850-8000 (480) 850-8014 (fax)

Page 9 of 9

APPENDIX D

SRPMIC ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE

SALT RIVER

PIMA-MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY

Community Development Department Environment al Protection & Natural Resources

10005 EAST OSBORN ROAD, SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85256 (480) 362•7500 [email protected]

MEMORANDUM

To: Josh Tracy, Ryan Companies Christopher Horan, CDD·EPNR Division Manager Thru:

Date: 02 May 2016 Subject: Chaparral Commerce Center EPNR Project II 16-201-008

A Request for Environmental Review (RER) was received by CDD·EPNR on 02 May 2016 from Josh Tracy requesting environmental & archaeological clearance for a two story building and paved parking lot. Anticipated project site to be graded 0·4 feet for parking lots and building pads as w ell as excavations up

to 10 feet in depth for utilities and foundations.

This memo is to inform you that the Community Development Department's Environmental Protection and Natural Resources Division has completed a review of the referenced site located on tribal land which is north of Chaparral Road and east of Pima Road, Section 18, Township 2 North, Range 5 East,

Gila & Salt River Baseline and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona.

The Community Development Department's Environrn.,ntal Protection and Naturol Resources Division has determined that there are no archaeological resources, biological species, or environmental concerns known to this specific area. The Environmental Protection and Natural Resources Department recommends environmental & archaeological clearance for the Chaparral Commerce Center Project.

As a condition of this clearance, please observe the following:

Should previously undocumented archaeological materials, cultural or blologlcal resources or hazardous materials be encountered during the course of construction or project activity, work must cease at that location and our office must be notified immediately at (480) 362-7500.

When engaged In a fugitive dust generating operation, the owner and/or operator shall Install, maintain, and use dust control measures, as applicable. The owner and/or operator gf the fugitive dust generating operation shall implement control measures before, after, and while conducting fugitive dust operations, Including weekends. after work hours. and on holidays. In the future any fugitive dust operations which e.ceed one (1) acre In size shall apply for and receive Dust Control Plan (DCP) approval from the EPNR prior to beginning

operations.

All ground disturbance in excess of one (1) acre in size requires the development of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Please contact EPNR If this is the case.

A Construction General Permit must be obtained from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX for any projects disturbing one (ll acre or more. The Notice of Intent (NOil that begins this process can be submitted electronically (http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/cnoi.clml and the SWPPP associated with

the project myst be submitted at the same time.

http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/cnoi.clmlmailto:[email protected]

2 SRPMIC-EPNR Chaparral Commerce Center

[May 2, 2016]

The owner and/or operation shall maintain the areafsl in a sanitary condition at all times; waste materials shall he properly disposed of promptly. No owner and/or operator shall dispose of recyclable material through solid waste disposal. The owner/operator assumes all responsibility for the removal of hazardous wastes. either found. generated or disposed of.

The environmental review performed by the Environmental Protection and Natural Resources Department is solely for the purpose of conducting an environmental clearance for the Project herein. Applicant indemnifies the Environmental Protection and Natural Resources Department against liability, claims, demands, obligations, causes of action which landowners may have in regard to any affected allotment(sl, and for any and all personal injury, property damage, and other activities related to the Project or conducted by the Applicant.

Should you have any questions, please contact EPNR at 480.362.7500.

Cc: Christopher Horan, CDD-EPNR Division Manager Tom Wright, Archaeologist Scott Thigpen, ECS Manager Randy Dockerty, ECS Compliance Michael Byrd, Public Wroks

APPENDIX E

GENERATOR SPECIFICATIONS

I

I I

ELECTRIC POWER - Technical Spec Sheet STANDARD

3512C 1500 ekW/ 1875 kVA/ 60 Hz/ 1800 rpm/ 480 V/ 0.8 Power Factor

Rating Type: STANDBY Emissions: U.S. EPA Certified for Stationary Emergency Use Only (Tier 2 Nonroad Equivalent Emission Standards)

3512C 1500 ekW/ 1875 kVA

60 Hz/ 1800 rpm/ 480 V

Metric English

Image shown may not reflect actual configuration

Package Performance

Genset Power Rating with Fan @ 0.8 Power Factor 1500 ekW

Genset Power Rating 1875 kVA

Aftercooler (Separate Circuit) N/A N/A

Fuel Consumption

100% Load with Fan 395.9 L/hr 104.6 gal/hr




Cooling System¹

Engine Coolant Capacity 156.8 L 41.4 gal

Inlet Air

Combustion Air Inlet Flow Rate 139.8 m³/min 4937.2 cfm

Max. Allowable Combustion Air Inlet Temp 49 ° C 121 ° F

Exhaust System

Exhaust Stack Gas Temperature 402.6 ° C 756.6 ° F

Exhaust Gas Flow Rate 332.3 m³/min 11734.1 cfm

Exhaust System Backpressure (Maximum Allowable) 6.7 kPa 27.0 in. water

SS-9034146-18330910-025 SS Page 5 of 7 TSS-DM8260-06-GS-EPG-9034146.pdf © 2017 Caterpillar All Rights Reserved Page 1 of 3




Heat Rejection

Heat Rejection to Jacket Water 502 kW 28541 Btu/min

Heat Rejection to Exhaust (Total) 1398 kW 79477 Btu/min

Heat Rejection to Aftercooler 519 kW 29539 Btu/min

Heat Rejection to Atmosphere from Engine 124 kW 7072 Btu/min

Heat Rejection to Atmosphere from Generator 74 kW 4208 Btu/min

Alternator²

Motor Starting Capability @ 30% Voltage Dip 4350 skVA

Current 2255 amps

Frame Size 1447

Excitation IE

Temperature Rise 150 ° C

Emissions (Nominal)³

NOx 2373.9 mg/Nm³ 5.5 g/hp-hr

CO 237.3 mg/Nm³ 0.5 g/hp-hr

HC 51.7 mg/Nm³ 0.1 g/hp-hr

PM 13.0 mg/Nm³ 0.0 g/hp-hr

DEFINITIONS AND CONDITIONS

1. For ambient and altitude capabilities consult your Cat dealer. Air flow restriction (system) is added to existing restriction from factory.

2. UL 2200 Listed packages may have oversized generators with a different temperature rise and motor starting characteristics. Generator temperature rise is based on a 40° C ambient per NEMA MG1-32.

3. Emissions data measurement procedures are consistent with those described in EPA CFR 40 Part 89, Subpart D & E and ISO8178-1 for measuring HC, CO, PM, NOx. Data shown is based on steady state operating conditions of 77° F, 28.42 in HG and number 2 diesel fuel with 35° API and LHV of 18,390 btu/lb. The nominal emissions data shown is subject to instrumentation, measurement, facility and engine to engine variations. Emissions data is based on 100% load and thus cannot be used to compare to EPA regulations which use values based on a weighted cycle.





Applicable Codes and Standards: AS1359, CSA C22.2 No100-04, UL142,UL489, UL869, UL2200, NFPA37, NFPA70, NFPA99, NFPA110, IBC, IEC60034-1, ISO3046, ISO8528, NEMA MG1-22,NEMA MG1-33, 2006/95/EC, 2006/42/EC, 2004/108/EC.

Note: Codes may not be available in all model configurations. Please consult your local Cat Dealer representative for availability.

STANDBY:Output available with varying load for the duration of the interruption of the normal source power. Average power output is 70% of the standby power rating. Typical operation is 200 hours per year, with maximum expected usage of 500 hours per year.

Ratings are based on SAE J1349 standard conditions. These ratings also apply at ISO3046 standard conditions

Fuel Rates are based on fuel oil of 35º API [16º C (60º F)] gravity having an LHV of 42 780 kJ/kg (18,390 Btu/lb) when used at 29º C (85º F) and weighing 838.9 g/liter (7.001 lbs/U.S. gal.). Additional ratings may be available for specific customer requirements, contact your Cat representative for details. For information regarding Low Sulfur fuel and Biodiesel capability, please consult your Cat dealer.

www.Cat-ElectricPower.com

Performance No.: DM8260-06 Feature Code: 512DR9B

The International System of Units (SI) is used in this publication. CAT, CATERPILLAR, their respectiveGenerator Arrangement: 3838418 logos, ADEM, EUI, S•O•S, "Caterpillar Yellow" and the "Power Edge" trade dress, as well as corporate and product identity used herein, are trademarks of Caterpillar and may not be used without permission.

Date: 03/08/2017

Source Country: U.S.


http:www.Cat-ElectricPower.com

APPENDIX F

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

EXHIBIT "A-1"

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE LEASED PREMISES

May 23, 2016 Job No. 13·139

Page 1 of 1 CHAPARRAL CORPORATE OFFICE LEGAL DESCRIPTION

A PARCEL LOCATED WITHIN THE SALT RIVER PIMA-MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY BEING THAT PORTION OF THE SALT RIVER ALLOTMENTS (SRAL) $22,624 AND 625, BEING BOUNDED BY PIMA l~OAD ON THE WEST SIDE ANO LOOP 101 (PIMA FREEWAY) ON THE EAST SIDE, ALL BEING LOCATED IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST OF THt, GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT A FOUND CITY OF SCOTTSDALE BRASS CAP IN A HAND HOLE AT ntE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18, FROM WHICH A FOUND CITY OF SCOTTSDALE BRASS CAP IN A HAND HOLE AT THE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18 BEARS SOUTH 00 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2644.99 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 36 MINUTES OS SECONDS EAST, LEAVING SAID WEST SECTION LINE, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SRAL 622, A DISTANCE OF 55.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED;

THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 59 SECONDS EAST, ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 55 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINl;c OF SAID SECTION 18, A DISTANCE OF 1,520.04 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, LEAVING SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 922.88 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID LOOP 101 (PIMA FRE&WAY);

THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 59 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 199.W FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGR~~S 06 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,320.40 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SRAl 022;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 36 MINUTES OS SECONDS WEST, LEAVJNG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SRAl 622, A DISTANCE OF 931.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DE$CHIBED.

SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 1,408,444 SQUARE FEET OR 32.333 ACRES

SRAL 622 PORTION: 613,387 SQUARE FEET OR 14.081 ACRES 6RAL 624 rorrnON: 610,69G :JQUARE FEET OR 14.020 ACRES SRAL 625 PORTION: 184,361 SQUARE FEET OR 4.232 ACRES

S1,r10,' lrinovatlo-r, Droup, ln,::. 73C,1 f;Mt Evans Road, s~oils.-dal&, AZ 8~26-0

Exhibit "A-1" S:\SMM\Salt Rvr Devco\Ryan\GrndSb!s\Ls.vl O.docx

http:Devco\Ryan\GrndSb!s\Ls.vlhttp:1,320.40http:1,520.04

Cover LetterTable of ContentsAPPENDIX A: MINOR NEW SOURCE REVIEW PERMIT APPLICATIONAPPENDIX B: POTENTIAL TO EMIT CALCULATIONAPPENDIX C: THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES REPORTAPPENDIX D: SRPMIC ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCEAPPENDIX E: GENERATOR SPECIFICATIONSAPPENDIX F: LEGAL DESCRIPTION

minor new source review permit application · minor new source review permit application mckesson...

Documents